A History of the Rise of the Golden Horde of the Mongols

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of the Rise of the Golden Horde of the Mongols A HISTORY OF THE RISE OF THE GOLDEN HORDE OF THE MONGOLS The Golden Horde, Ulug Ulus was originally a Mongol and later Turkicized khanate established The first known use of the term, in , in the Russian chronicle History of Kazan, applied it to the Ulus of Batu (Russian: Улуѕа Батыѕ), centered on Qaidu and the Rise of the Independent Mongol State In Central Asia. In he conquered the Bashkirs, a western Turkic people from the Eurasian borderlands. Clmae the picture is of a 19th century reproduction. His injuries contribute to his death a little while later, in Regions in the lower Volga inhabited by the descendants of Nogai Khan At the same time, the influence of Nogai greatly increased in the Golden Horde. Rumors spread that Shevkal wanted to occupy the throne for himself and introduce Islam to the city. Relations between the Italians and the Golden Horde remained tense until Toqta's death. Public Domain The dismounted Mongols, with captured women, are on the left, the Hungarians, with one saved woman, on the right. The tribesmen spend that summer on the plains of Hungary , grasslands similar to their own steppes. It is a measure of the task confronting the young Temujin that it takes him the first twenty-five years of his fighting life to win a position of power among his own people. Riders gallop between well-equipped staging posts across the steppes, enabling a message to travel more than miles in a day. But the single most important element is a ruthless use of two psychological weapons, loyalty and fear. In Bukhara, he and Hulagu slaughtered all the retainers of the Golden Horde and reduced their families into slavery, sparing only the Great Khan Kublai's men. According to some Muslim sources, Hulagu refused to share his war booty with Berke in accordance with Genghis Khan's wish. Mongol armies have nibbled, but little more, at the northern provinces of China. Genghis Khan has entrusted the western extreme of his empire to his eldest son, Juchi, who dies shortly before himself in Continue Reading. Its ascendancy terminated the rise of Kievan Rus Kiev was razed in and ultimately, although indirectly, contributed to the predominance of Muscovite Russia see Moscow, grand duchy of. Learn More in these related Britannica articles:. Batu's grandson Mengu-Timur was nominated by Kublai and succeeded his uncle Berke. Toqta was defeated in their first battle. Some of Mengu-Timur's relatives converted to Christianity at the same time and settled among the Rus' people. In Berke marched past Tiflis to fight against Hulagu's successor Abagha , but he died en route. Berke's attack on Prussia in and nearly destroyed the Teutonic Order, one of the organizations of German knightly Crusaders. While the left bank of Khorazm would eventually be retaken, Berke had lost control over Transoxiana. Dmitri avenging the death of his father in the ordo palace of Uzbeg Khan , killing Yury. Then he sought assistance from Egypt against the Ilkhanate. The Russian princes won a signal victory over the Horde general Mamai at the Battle of Kulikovo in But the horde then moves south. Sokol Sartaq promptly died and was replaced by Batu's younger brother Berke. The gates are opened. The Jochids believed that Hulagu's state eliminated their presence in the Transcaucasus. One of them, Nomoghan, favorite of Kublai, was located in the Crimea. This gramota says: Mengu-Timur's word to Prince Yaroslav: give the German merchants way into your lands. Horsemen can move fast along the steppes. The Mongols took regular census counts and required regular tax payments, but otherwise left the people to their own devices so long as they did not try to rebel. The Mongols are coming. Under his central control, Mongol armies make further inroads into China. In addition to his attack on Poland in , Talabuga's army made unsuccessful attempts to invade the Ilkhanate in and Batu was still not satisfied..
Recommended publications
  • Der VERMUTUNGEN
    Das BUCH der VERMUTUNGEN. Marco Polo – Eine Legende und deren Weltbeschreibung am Prüfstand aktueller Forschungspositionen. DIPLOMARBEIT zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Magisters der Philosophie an der Geisteswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz vorgelegt von Markus Robert HAUSMANN am Institut für Geschichte Begutachter: Ass.-Prof. Mag. Dr. phil. Johannes Giessauf Graz, Dezember 2013 Für mich. Für meine geduldige Familie. Für die (Nach-)Welt und deren Bücherregale. „Bei allem immanenten Interesse an Marco Polos Buch mag man doch zweifeln, ob es über Generationen hinweg auf viele Leser solch anhaltende Faszination ausgeübt hätte ohne die schwierigen Fragen, die es stellt. Es ist ein großartiges Werk voller Rätsel, wobei wir im Vertrauen auf das menschliche Wahrheitsstreben glauben, dass es zu jedem Rätsel eine Lösung gibt.“ (HENRY YULE, The Book of Ser Marco Polo) INHALTSVERZEICHNIS i. | MARCO SEI DANK! 5 I. | PROLOG – EINLEITUNG 6 II. | WER WAREN DIE POLOS? 11 III. | ZWEI SAGENHAFTE REISEN 19 IV. | KONTROVERSIELLE AUTORSCHAFT 37 V. | KOMPLEXITÄTEN DER ÜBERLIEFERUNG 44 V. I. | DIE FAMILIEN DER HANDSCHRIFTEN 44 V. II. | DISKUSSION UND FORSCHUNGSTENDENZEN 49 VI. | KOHÄRENZPROBLEME DES „ITINERARS“ 55 VI. I. | EIN GEO-ETHNOGRAPHISCHES DICKICHT 55 VI. II. | CHINESISCHE NAMEN IM PERSISCHEN KLEID 60 VII. | VERGESSENE ZIVILISATIONS-/KULTURASPEKTE 64 VII. I. | SCHRIFTLOSE DRUCKWERKE 67 VII. II. | VERSCHMÄHTE AUFGÜSSE 71 VII. III. | VON EINGEBUNDENEN FÜßEN UND KORMORANEN 73 VII. IV. | DIE ÜBERSEHENE GROßE MAUER 78 VIII. | EINE BEEINDRUCKENDE FÜLLE AN FAKTEN 83 IX. | VERMEINTLICHE ÄMTER UND AUFGABEN 96 IX. I. | DIE SELBSTERNANNTEN BELAGERUNGS-EXPERTEN 96 IX. II. | RÄTSELHAFTE GOUVERNEURSWÜRDEN 99 IX. III. | EIN JUGENDLICHER EMISSÄR & SEINE DIPLOMATEN 105 X. | DAS SCHWEIGEN DER QUELLEN 112 XI.
    [Show full text]
  • Appanage Russia
    0 BACKGROUND GUIDE: APPANAGE RUSSIA 1 BACKGROUND GUIDE: APPANAGE RUSSIA Hello delegates, My name is Paul, and I’ll be your director for this year. Working with me are your moderator, Tristan; your crisis manager, Davis; and your analysts, Lawrence, Lilian, Philip, and Sofia. We’re going to be working together to make this council as entertaining and educational (yeah yeah, I know) as possible. A bit about me? I am a third year student studying archaeology, and this is also my third year doing UTMUN. Now enough about me. Let’s talk about something far more interesting: Russia. Russian history is as brutal as the land itself, especially during our time of study. Geography sets the stage with freezing winters and mud-ridden summers. This has huge effects on how Russia’s economy and society functions. Coupled with that are less-than-neighbourly neighbours: the power- hungry nations of western and central Europe, The Byzantine Empire (a consistent love- hate partner), and (big surprise) various nomadic groups, one of which would eventually pose quite a problem for the idea of Russian independence. Uh oh, it looks like it’s suddenly 1300 and all of you are Russian Princess.You are all under the rule of Toqta Khan of the Golden Horde (Halperin, 2009), one of the successor states to Genghis Khan’s massive empire. Bummer. But, there is hope: through working together and with wise reactions to the crises that will inevitably come your way, you might just be able shake off the Tatar Yoke. Of course, your problems are not so limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Paleologina and the Il-Khanate of Persia. a Byzantine Princess in an Empire Between Islam and Christendom
    MARIA PALEOLOGINA AND THE IL-KHANATE OF PERSIA. A BYZANTINE PRINCESS IN AN EMPIRE BETWEEN ISLAM AND CHRISTENDOM MARÍA ISABEL CABRERA RAMOS UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA SpaIN Date of receipt: 26th of January, 2016 Final date of acceptance: 12th of July, 2016 ABSTRACT In the 13th century Persia, dominated by the Mongols, a Byzantine princess, Maria Paleologina, stood out greatly in the court of Abaqa Khan, her husband. The Il-Khanate of Persia was then an empire precariously balanced between Islam, dominant in its territories and Christianity that was prevailing in its court and in the diplomatic relations. The role of Maria, a fervent Christian, was decisive in her husband’s policy and in that of any of his successors. Her figure deserves a detailed study and that is what we propose in this paper. KEYWORDS Maria Paleologina, Il-khanate of Persia, Abaqa, Michel VIII, Mongols. CapitaLIA VERBA Maria Paleologa, Ilkhanatus Persiae, Abaqa, Michael VIII, Mongoles. IMAGO TEMPORIS. MEDIUM AEVUM, XI (2017): 217-231 / ISSN 1888-3931 / DOI 10.21001/itma.2017.11.08 217 218 MARÍA ISABEL CABRERA RAMOS 1. Introduction The great expansion of Genghis Khan’s hordes to the west swept away the Islamic states and encouraged for a while the hopes of the Christian states of the East. The latter tried to ally themselves with the powerful Mongols and in this attempt they played the religion card.1 Although most of the Mongols who entered Persia, Iraq and Syria were shamanists, Nestorian Christianity exerted a strong influence among elites, especially in the court. That was why during some crucial decades for the history of the East, the Il-Khanate of Persia fluctuated between the consolidation of Christian influence and the approach to Islam, that despite the devastation brought by the Mongols in Persia,2 Iraq and Syria remained the dominant factor within the Il-khanate.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterarbeit / Master´S Thesis
    MASTERARBEIT / MASTER´S THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit / Title of the Master´s Thesis „Marriage Strategies in the Early Palaiologan Period“ verfasst von / submitted by Konstantina Gerakini angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 2018 / Vienna 2018 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 066 869 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Masterstudium Byzantinistik und Neogräzistik degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.- Prof. Dr. Claudia Rapp TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 INTRODUCTION The historical frame 4 Late Byzantine aristocracy: definition and state of research 6 Methodological approach 7 The Structure of the Thesis 8 The Sources 9 I. THE ARISTOCRACY IN THE EARLY PALAIOLOGAN PERIOD I.1. The Byzantine aristocracy: definition and terminology 13 Ranks and offices in the early Palaiologan period 18 The self-consciousness of the aristocracy 21 I.2.The Palaiologan high aristocracy 23 II. MARRIAGE STRATEGIES OF THE ARISTOCRACY IN THE EARLY PALAIOLOGAN PERIOD II.1. Marriage strategies of the aristocracy from the tenth to thirteenth century 41 Marriage strategies of the military aristocracy of the tenth century 41 Marriage strategies of the aristocratic families of the eleventh and twelfth centuries. The Komnenoi and the Doukai 44 Marriage strategies of the Angeloi and the Laskarids 49 II.2. Marriage strategies until 1259. The rise of the Palaiologoi 51 Marriage strategies of the Laskarids and other families of the aristocracy 57 1 II.3. Marriage strategies in the reign of Michael VIII Palaiologos (1259-1282) 62 II.4.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Origins of the Russian History 2. the Invasion of the Tartars And
    chapter 5 Our reconstruction of the Russian history before the battle of Kulikovo 1. All the astronomical data contained in Russian THE ORIGINS OF THE RUSSIAN HISTORY chronicles can only be confirmed starting with the XIV century and on. According to our hypothesis, the more or less doc- Our hypothesis is as follows: the Povest Vremennyh umented period in Russian history (that is to say, Let has absorbed events from Byzantine chronicles, Russian history that relies upon written sources that coated by a layer of later Russian events, primarily dat- have survived until the present day) only begins with ing from the XVI century. We shall cite plenty of ex- the XIV century a.d. Unfortunately, we can only give amples below. a very general outline of the pre-XIV century Russian Thus, we find no traces of documented Russian history; apparently, there are no surviving documents history that predate the XIII century; it is possible in existence that could assist one here. that no historians had existed outside Byzantium back Let us turn to the Povest Vremennyh Let,which fol- then. lows Russian historical events up until 1204 – the fall The power of Byzantium, even if regarded as a of Constantinople after the fourth crusade. Morozov purely formal or a wholly religious institution, cov- reports his study of this chronicle’s various copies in ered enormous territories, which were often at a great [547] and shares his opinion that the Povest Vremen- distance from the capital. The dominant role of Byz- nyh Let is most likely to relate Byzantine events and antium in the epoch of the XI-XIII century is ex- have little in common with the Russian history.
    [Show full text]
  • Anadolu'da Moğol Boyları - Uluslararası Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi/ International Journal of Historical Researches, Yıl/Vol
    Anadolu Moğolları: Anadolu'da Moğol Boyları - Uluslararası Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi/ International Journal of Historical Researches, Yıl/Vol. 1, Sayı/No. 1 Bahar/Spring 2018 Anadolu Moğolları: Anadolu'da Moğol Boyları Ekizceliler.com* Marco Polo* Sadun Köprülü* Anadolu Moğolları* Özet Moğolcalı, Moğolcalu, Moğulcalı, Moğulcalu, Muğalcalı, Muğalcalu, Muğulcalı, Muğulcalu, Muscalı, Muscalu, Musacalı, Musacalu, Müscalı, Müscalu, Müsacalı, Müsacalu, Musulcalı, Musulculu, Musulcalu, Muslucalı, Muslucu, Muslucalu aşireti – diye Irak’ın Musul, TELAFER Türk-Moğolları. Türkleşmiş Moğol aşiretidir. Bugün (Emirdağ’ında “Nevahi-i Barçın Kazası”) Ekizce köyünde yaşarlar. Ve Jırgın (Cırgın) aşiretide bugün (Emirdağ’ında “Nevahi-i Barçın Kazası”) yaşarlar. Ve Diğer Moğol boyları: Tatarlar, Kireyitler, Naymanlar, Sünit, Bisüvüt, Suganut, Mangıt, Kurulas, Kongırat, Dürben, Kıyat, Bayaut (Bayat), Barın, Barlas, İlhanlı, Uyrat aşireti, Suldus aşireti, Celayir aşireti, Sutay (Sutai) aşireti, Tatar aşireti, Mugal Tatarları cemaati, Moğultay cemaati (İçel Yörükleri), Çalış ("Tataran-ı Gayiban" Arsa Yüzü Bölüğü) aşireti, Çavurcu cemaati, Garb Yüzü Bölüğü (Tataran-ı Mugal), Gayiban Tatarları, Haymene-i Tataran-ı Mugal cemaati, Hamis Ağıl (Ulu Azman "Tataran-ı Mugal" Garb Yüzü Bölüğü), Hindüler cemaati ("Baybal Özü Bölüğü" Baybal Özü Bölüğü), İletmiş Bölüğü cemaati (Tataran Cemaati), Karataylu cemaati ("Moğol Tatarları cemaati" Arsa Yüzü Bölüğü), Kayabalu Bölüğü cemaati (Tataran-ı Mugal), Konbaklar cemaati (Tataran-ı Mugal), Nureddin cemaati ("Moğol Tatarları
    [Show full text]
  • 18—Archi People
    2014 – Nogai People “Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you” – Luke 6:31 Proud descendants of the ancient Golden Horde, the Nogai people are now located in scattered regions of southern Russia---northern Dagestan, northern Chechnya, and Stavropol, Astrakhan, and Karachai-Cherkessia. The name Nogai is derived from Nogai Khan, a general of the Golden Horde, who was a great-great-grandson of Genghiz Khan. The Mongol Empire, under Genghiz Khan and his sons, swept into power across a wide swath of western Asia and eastern Europe (reaching all the way to Hungary) in the early 13th Century. The Golden Horde was the western wing of the Mongol Empire, holding sway in southern Russia and eastern Europe from the 13th to the 15th Century. Eventually defeated by the Lithuanians and Russians in the late 15th Century, the remnants of the Golden Horde continued to live in large numbers in southern Russia in the Volga region, in the steppe lands north of the Caucasus and in southern Ukraine and Crimea. The Nogai, one of the surviving sub-groups of the Golden Horde, are of combined Mongol-Turkic descent. The Nogai speak their own distinct Nogai language, which is a Turkic language— one of 5 Turkic languages spoken in the North Caucasus (Kumyk, Karachai, Balkar, Meskhetian Turk—the other 4). The largest concentration of present-day Nogai culture is in 20 towns/villages of the steppe lands of northern Dagestan, and as part of the ethnic melting-pot composition of major urban areas of Dagestan, such as Kizylar and Makhachkala.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
    Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies http://journals.cambridge.org/BSO Additional services for Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here ISTVÁN VÁSÁRY: Cumans and Tatars: Oriental Military in the Pre­Ottoman Balkans, 1185–1365. xvi, 230 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. £48. GEORGE LANE Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies / Volume 69 / Issue 01 / February 2006, pp 154 ­ 157 DOI: 10.1017/S0041977X06280078, Published online: 20 April 2006 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0041977X06280078 How to cite this article: GEORGE LANE (2006). Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 69, pp 154­157 doi:10.1017/S0041977X06280078 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/BSO, IP address: 212.219.238.14 on 30 Oct 2012 154 REVIEWS While Georgian kings began looking to the Christian power to their north as a potential ally against their threatening Muslim neighbours from the late sixteenth century, it is only in 1699 that Armenians first appealed to Russia to free their homeland. Armenians had originally sought the help of princes of western Europe, and it is on the advice of one of these, the Palatine Elector, that they petitioned the Russian Tsar. The Palatine Elector’s advice was pertinently based on the geographical proximity of Russia to the Caucasus. The first Armenian petition to the tsars would be followed by many others throughout the eighteenth century. Indeed, the history of relations between the Armenians of Transcaucasia and the Russian Empire during that period is mostly one of Armenians hoping for a Russian invasion that would free East- ern Armenia from the oppression of the Persian shahs and local khans.
    [Show full text]
  • POLISH ROYAL ANCESTRY Book 1 - Medieval Era (Abt
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY POLISH ROYAL ANCESTRY Book 1 - Medieval Era (abt. 800-1400) INTRODUCTION Poland has had a very tumultuous past involving several wars. It has been attacked by Tatars and Russians from the East, Turks and Austrians from the South, Teuotonic Knights and Prussians from the West and Swedes from the North. It has been occupied and divided countless times but always maintained a small but very patriotic core, which has made it possible to survive. I micro similarity to what has happened in Poland is how Berlin was divided in four zones after World War II. The information about our lineage from the Polish royalty is somewhat unique in that we are directly related to the rulers from the first one to the 12th generation (great grand parents) where our direct lineage branches away from the Polish. The subsequent rulers are thus cousins. Below is a list of the ancestors, those covered in the text are highlighted. In some cases the spouses are also highlighted, this indicated that we are related to them also, but from a different lineage. The lineage to us is listed at the end of this book. The era and the Piast dynasty, covered by Book 1 ends with Saint Hedwig (Jadwiga) King of Poland, who had no children. Note that although a female, she was designated “King” according to the Polish custom. Book 2 begins with her husband, Jogaila Wladyslaw II Jagiello King of Poland, who with his second wife was the first of the next Jagellonian dynasty. He is not a direct ancestor for us, but we do have a common ancestor, Vladimir II "Monomach" Grand Duke of Kiev, my 26th great grand father.
    [Show full text]
  • The Middle Ages in Romania Began with the Withdrawal of the Mongols
    The Middle Ages in Romania began with the withdrawal of the Mongols, the last of the migrating populations to invade the territory of modern Romania, after their attack of 1241– 1242. It came to an end with the reign of Michael the Brave (1593–1601) who managed, for a short time in 1600, to rule Wallachia, Moldavia and Transylvania, the three principalities whose territories were to be united some three centuries later to form Romania. Over most of this period, Banat, Crişana, Maramureş and Transylvania – now regions in Romania to the west of the Carpathian Mountains – were part of the Kingdom of Hungary. They were divided into several types of administrative units, such as "counties" and "seats". The heads of the Transylvanian counties or "counts" were subordinated to a special royal official called voivode, but the province was seldom treated as a single unit, since the Székely and Saxon seats were administered separately. In the kingdom, Romanian peasants, being Orthodox, were exempt from the tithe, an ecclesiastical tax payable by all Roman Catholic commoners. However, Romanian noblemen slowly lost the ability to participate in political life, as the 14th-century monarchs pursued a zealous pro- Catholic policy. Their position became even worse after 1437 when the so-called "Union of Three Nations", an alliance of the Hungarian noblemen, the Székelys, and the Saxons, was formed in order to crush the Bobâlna peasant uprising. Wallachia, the first independent medieval state between the Carpathians and the lower Danube was created when Basarab I (c. 1310–1352) terminated the suzerainty of the king of Hungary with his victory in the battle of Posada in 1330.
    [Show full text]
  • Karibayev B. the RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN the KAZAKH
    IRSTI 03.20.00 Karibayev B. Prof., Dr., al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan, Almaty, e-mail: [email protected] THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE KAZAKH KHANATE DURING THE REIGN OF KHAKNAZAR KHAN AND THE SHAIBANID STATE IN MUERENNAKHR In this article, the author examines the activities and policies of Khaknazar Khan, who ruled in the 40-80’s. XVI century, at the time of the revival of the Kazakh Khanate and the personal human qualities of the Khan, the problems of Khaknazar Khan’s relationship between the rulers of Mueren- nakhr in the 70s of the mentioned century are also considered. At this time, the political situation of Mauerannakhr was complicated, the process of power struggle divided into two political groups – the Baba Sultan group in Tashkent and the Abdallah Khan group in Bukhara. In the interests of the Kazakh people, Khaknazar Khan supported the ruler of Bukhara. He died during the struggle with Baba Sultan. Key words: Kazakh khanate, Khaknazar khan, Shygay khan, Transoxiana, dynasty of shaibanids, Abdallah khan. Кәрібаев Б.Б. әл-Фараби атындағы Қазақ ұлттық университетінің профессоры, т.ғ.д., Қазақстан, Алматы қ., e-mail: [email protected] Хақназар хан тұсындағы Қазақ хандығы мен Мауереннахрдағы шайбанилық мемлекет арасындағы қарым-қатынастар Автор мақаласында XVI ғасырдың 40-80-ші жылдары қазақ ханы болған Хақназар ханның жеке адами болмысындағы қасиеттері мен Қазақ хандығының қайта өрлеуі кезеңіндегі жүргізген саясатын, оның ішінде сол ғасырдың 70-ші жылдары Мауереннахр билеушілерімен жүргізген қарым-қатынастары мәселелерін қарастырады. Сол кезде Мауереннахрда қалыптасқан саяси жағдайлар күрделеніп, билік үшін күрестер барысында екі саяси топ – Ташкентте Баба сұлтан, Бұхарада – Абдаллах хан қалыптасқан болатын.
    [Show full text]
  • BAGHDAD's FALL and ITS AFTERMATH Contesting The
    Al-Jāmi‘ah: Journal of Islamic Studies - ISSN: 0126-012X (p); 2356-0912 (e) Vol. 56, no. 1 (2018), pp.187-224, doi: 10.14421/ajis.2018.561.187-224 BAGHDAD’S FALL AND ITS AFTERMATH Contesting the Central Asian Political Background and the Emergence of Islamic Mongol Dynasties Muhammad Abdul Karim State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia email: [email protected] Abstract The sack of Baghdad is a dramatic event which was immediately followed by several key historical events, including the rise of Islamic Mongol. Founded by Chengiz Khan, the Mongol are the destroyer machine who previously ended the glory of Islam in 13th century Middle East. A lot has been said concerning that dramatic siege, but little has been discussed regarding the continuation between the siege and the “reverse flow” of the Mongols as the unique events in the aftermath of the Baghdad’s fall. The object of this paper is to examine the siege of Baghdad in the light of Central Asian frame and to explore the important events in the aftermath of the siege which are related to the rise of the Islamic Mongol Dynasties. [ Jatuhnya Baghdad merupakan peristiwa tragis yang diikuti oleh sejumlah peristiwa lain, termasuk munculnya kerajaan Mongol Islam. Dibawah kepemimpinan Chengisz Khan, Mongol berhasil menggantikan kejayaan Islam di Timur Tengah abad ketigabelas. Banyak studi yang telah mengkaji peralihan tersebut, namun sedikit yang membahas kelanjutan proses tersebut dan arus balik Mongol pasca jatuhnya Baghdad. Artikel ini membahas peralihan Baghdad dibawah konstelasi Asia Tengah dan peristiwa penting dibalik pendudukan Mongol hingga munculnya dinasti Islam Mongol.] Keywords: Baghdad’s fall, Central Asian context, fragmentation of the Mongols, Islamic Mongol dynasties.
    [Show full text]