materials
Review A Review on Low-Grade Thermal Energy Harvesting: Materials, Methods and Devices
Ravi Anant Kishore 1 ID and Shashank Priya 1,2,*
1 Center for Energy Harvesting Materials and Systems, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA; [email protected] 2 Materials Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-814-863-9657
Received: 19 July 2018; Accepted: 3 August 2018; Published: 14 August 2018
Abstract: Combined rejected and naturally available heat constitute an enormous energy resource that remains mostly untapped. Thermal energy harvesting can provide a cost-effective and reliable way to convert available heat into mechanical motion or electricity. This extensive review analyzes the literature covering broad topical areas under solid-state low temperature thermal energy harvesting. These topics include thermoelectricity, pyroelectricity, thermomagneticity, and thermoelasticity. For each topical area, a detailed discussion is provided comprising of basic physics, working principle, performance characteristics, state-of-the-art materials, and current generation devices. Technical advancements reported in the literature are utilized to analyze the performance, identify the challenges, and provide guidance for material and mechanism selection. The review provides a detailed analysis of advantages and disadvantages of each energy harvesting mechanism, which will provide guidance towards designing a hybrid thermal energy harvester that can overcome various limitations of the individual mechanism.
Keywords: thermoelectric; pyroelectric; thermomagnetic; thermoelastic
1. Introduction The ever-growing energy demand, escalating energy prices, and environmental concerns such as global warming compel us to look for cleaner and more sustainable energy sources. Thermal energy harvesting is a promising method for capturing freely available heat and converting it to a more usable form, such as mechanical or electrical energy. The ‘free’ heat is available to us primarily in two forms: waste heat and nature heat. It has been reported that more than half of the energy produced from various renewable and non-renewable resources worldwide is rejected to the environment, mostly in the form of waste heat [1]. In addition, natural resources such as geothermal heat, volcanic heat, and solar heat are the enormous energy resources that remain untapped. Plenty of such thermal energy reserves exist all over the world, which release thousands of joules of energy every second into the ambient atmosphere [2]. Unarguably, a cost-effective method for recovering waste heat and utilizing natural heat to generate electricity can revolutionize the production of renewable energy. Table1 shows some of the major waste heat sources along with the temperature range. Based upon the temperature, heat is usually classified into three categories: high-grade (1200 ◦F/649 ◦C and higher), medium-grade (450 ◦F/232 ◦C to 1200 ◦F/649 ◦C), and low-grade (450 ◦F/232 ◦C and lower) [3]. Normally high and medium grade heat is easy to recover; whereas low-grade waste heat, which constitutes more than 50% of the total waste heat, is unfortunately the most difficult to recover [3]. Considering hot and cold reservoirs at 232 ◦C and 25 ◦C respectively, it can be calculated that the Carnot efficiency of a low-grade heat recovery engine cannot be more than 41%. The Carnot efficiency decreases to 24%
Materials 2018, 11, 1433; doi:10.3390/ma11081433 www.mdpi.com/journal/materials Materials 2018, 11, 1433 2 of 45 when the operating temperature is between 150 ◦C and 50 ◦C. Such low efficiency makes the recovery process economically unviable using traditional power cycles.
Table 1. Major waste heat sources and their temperature range [4].
Temp Range Source Temp (◦C) Advantages Disadvantages/Barriers Nickel refining furnace 1370–1650
Steel electric arc furnace 1370–1650 • Highquality energy • Available for a diverse Basic oxygen furnace 1200 • High temperature creates range of enduses Aluminum reverberatory furnace 1100–1200 increased thermal with varying stresses on heat Copper refining furnace 760–820 temperature requirements exchange materials • Highefficiency High Steel heating furnace 930–1040 • Increased chemical ◦ power generation >1200 F activity/corrosion (>650 ◦C) Copper reverberatory furnace 900–1090 • High heat transfer rate Hydrogen plants 650–980 per unit area Fume incinerators 650–1430 Glass melting furnace 1300–1540 Coke oven 650–1000 Iron cupola 820–980 Steam boiler exhaust 230–480 • More compatible Gas turbine exhaust 370–540 with heat Medium - Reciprocating engine exhaust 320–590 exchanger materials 450–1200 ◦F • Practical for (230–650 ◦C) Heat treating furnace 430–650 power generation Drying & baking ovens 230–590 Cement kiln 450–620 Exhaust gases exiting recovery devices in gasfired boilers, 70–230 • Few end uses for low ethylene furnaces, etc. temperature heat Process steam condensate 50–90 • Lowefficiency • Large quantities of low Cooling water from: - power generation temperature heat • For combustion exhausts, Low furnace doors 30–50 contained in numerous ◦ lowtemperature heat <450 C product streams (<230 ◦C) annealing furnaces 70–230 recovery is impractical due to acidic air compressors 30–50 condensation and heat internal combustion 70–120 exchanger corrosion engines: air conditioning and 30–40 air conditioning and Drying, baking, and curing ovens 90–230 Hot processed liquids/solids 30–230
Steam Rankine cycle based power plants are currently the most common technology used to obtain work from heat. Steam Rankine cycle is simple to implement as heat is utilized to generate steam, which is eventually used to drive steam turbine. The traditional steam Rankine cycle has been recommended as the most efficient option for high- and medium-grade waste heat recovery [5]. For low-grade heat recovery, however, steam Rankine cycles are not cost-effective, as low-pressure and low-temperature steam requires bulkier equipment and produces water condensates on turbine blades causing the erosion [3]. For medium-to-low temperature operation, Rankine cycle requires a working fluid that has a lower boiling point than water. Examples of such fluids include silicon oil, propane, haloalkanes, isopentane, isobutane, pxylene, and toluene [3]. As it can be noticed, most of these fluids are organic compounds and therefore the modified thermodynamic cycle is traditionally referred to as the Organic Rankine cycle (ORC). The working principle of ORC is the same as the traditional Rankine cycle, except it utilizes organic fluids instead of steam. Compared with the steam Rankine cycle, ORC usually has simple structure, high reliability, and low maintenance cost, since its uses organic fluids having low boiling temperatures [6,7]. ORC has been proposed for waste heat recovery from a variety of areas including geothermal [8,9], solar [10,11], gas turbine [12], and combustion engines [13,14]. However, ORC presents several challenges and the most important one is finding a Materials 2018, 11, 1433 3 of 45 suitable organic fluid. Studies have shown that there is no single working fluid that is optimal for all ORC applications [15]. In addition, the overall efficiency of ORC based power plant has been reported to be in the range of 10–20%, which is much lower than the efficiency (30–40%) of the high temperature steam Rankine cycle [3]. Another alternative for a medium-to-low temperature heat source is the Kalina cycle. Unlike the steam and organic Rankine cycles that employ a single fluid, the Kalina cycle uses a binary fluid (i.e., solution of two fluids with different boiling points, such as ammonia and water) as the working fluid. The temperature of a singlefluid system remains constant during boiling and condensation. In contrast, the temperature of a binary mixture system (containing two fluids of different boiling point) increases during evaporation. This allows binary fluid to obtain a better thermal matching with the heat source in the evaporator and with the cooling medium in the condenser [3], enabling the Kalina cycle to achieve energy conversion efficiency close to the efficiency of the steam Rankine cycle [16]. The Kalina cycle, however, has some drawbacks. First, the Kalina cycle requires a complicated plant scheme [17]. Second, high vapor fraction in the boiler results in low heat transfer coefficients, and thus a large heat exchanger is required. The other drawback of the Kalina cycle is a relatively higher corrosion rate. Impurities such as air or carbon dioxide in liquid ammonia cause stress corrosion cracking in fluid carrying mild-steel hydraulic pipes. Ammonia is also highly corrosive towards copper and zinc [18]. Lastly, the Kalina cycle is a proprietary technology. All first generation global patents related to the Kalina cycle processes are owned by Wasabi Energy [19] and Kalex LLC owns licensing the rights for deploying the second generation Kalina cycle [20]. Considering these limitations and the practical challenges, the Kalina cycle is not always justifiable, especially for small-scale low-grade heat recovery [21]. In the last few decades, immense efforts have been made to explore and develop alternative technologies to capture low-grade heat. The low-grade thermal energy harvesting technologies are currently based upon the thermoelectric, pyroelectric, thermomagnetic, and thermoelastic effect (Figure1). Among these, thermoelectric energy harvesting is the most popular and studied technology. Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) are based upon the Seebeck effect and they generate direct current in response to thermal gradients. Pyroelectric, thermomagnetic, and thermoelastic energy harvesting methods are also old concepts, but practical developments in these fields has been quite sluggish in comparison to thermoelectric devices, primarily because of their requirement of temperature fluctuation. Electric, magnetic, or elastic properties of certain materials change due to fluctuation in temperature, and this phenomenon is used to produce mechanical or electrical work. There are several advantages in using thermal energy harvesters over traditional heat engines. The thermal energy harvesters incur minimal operational cost as they utilize freely available thermal energy such as waste heat and natural heat and convert it in to useful work. In comparison to traditional heat engines, thermal energy harvesters operate at low temperature and therefore have suitability for applications such as powering sensor nodes. Thermal energy harvesters are solid-state devices, do not produce harmful discharge, and have very low maintenance cost. They possess low energy conversion efficiency, typically 1–10%, but are self-sustainable, which makes them suitable for providing power in remote or hard-to–reach areas. The reliability of these devices can be understood from the fact that NASA uses Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) for powering the spacecraft. One of the available report states that RTGs have been used for a total combined time of over 300 years, and a not a single thermocouple has ever ceased producing power [22]. Materials 2018, 11, 1433 4 of 45 Materials 2018, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 45
Figure 1. Relevant thermal energy harvesting technologies: thermoelectricity, pyroelectricity, Figure 1. Relevant thermal energy harvesting technologies: thermoelectricity, pyroelectricity, thermomagneticity, and thermoelasticity. Thermal energy harvesters are solid-state devices thermomagneticity, and thermoelasticity. Thermal energy harvesters are solid-state devices that do not that do not require any fuel and do not produce harmful discharge. require any fuel and do not produce harmful discharge.
Figure 2 shows the number of scientific papers published in the field of thermoelectric, pyroelectric,Figure2 shows thermomagnetic, the number of scientificand thermoelastic papers published from the in the year field 2001 of thermoelectric, to present. It can pyroelectric, be noted thermomagnetic,that, collectively, and about thermoelastic 3200 papers from were the year pub 2001lished to present.in 2017 Itand can looking be noted at that, the collectively, trend, this aboutnumber 3200 is papers expected were publishedto increase in 2017in the and fort lookinghcoming at the trend,years. this Undoubtedly, number is expected thermal to increaseenergy inharvesting the forthcoming is a very years. hotly Undoubtedly, pursued subject thermal unde energyrgoing harvesting intense isinvestigation a very hotly by pursued the scientific subject undergoingcommunity. intense While investigationthe focus of many by the of scientific these stud community.ies is to develop While thean efficient focus of material, many of thesethere studiesis parallel is to emphasis develop an on efficient developing material, methodolog there is parallely to optimize emphasis the on system developing level methodologyperformance. to A optimizereview on the this system topic level that performance. summarizes A importan review ont technical this topic advancements that summarizes and important then utilizes technical the advancementspublished information and then utilizes to analyze the published the perform informationance, toidentify analyze the the challenges, performance, and identify provide the challenges,guidance for and material provide and guidance mechanism for material selection and mechanismwill serve the selection community will serve to focus the community its energy toon focus addressing its energy the on relevant addressing challenges. the relevant This challenges. review provides This review a comp providesrehensive a comprehensive summary of summarymaterials, of designs, materials, models, designs, models,and experimental and experimental results results reported reported in literature in literature and and analyzes analyzes thethe informationinformation to to provide provide guidance guidance for the for development the development of thermal of energythermal harvesters. energy harvesters. To our knowledge, To our thisknowledge, is the first this review is the paper first where review various paper facets wher ofe thermalvarious energy facets harvestingof thermal have energy been harvesting analyzed together.have been While analyzed each thermal together. harvesting While methodology each thermal has harvesting certain advantages methodology and disadvantages, has certain aadvantages combinatory and study disadvantages, is necessary to sheda combinatory new light on understandingstudy is necessary the differences, to shed whichnew willlight help on researchersunderstanding to integrate the differences, the information which in systematic will help fashion. researchers The information to integrate presented the information in this study in hassystematic been obtained fashion. after The an exhaustive information literature presented review, in comprising this study of has more been than 300obtained journal after papers. an Whileexhaustive our focus literature is to provide review, the comprising most recent of findings, more than we have 300 alsojournal attempted papers. to While briefly our include focus the is historicalto provide developments. the most recent Broadly, findings, the study we provides have al aso discussion attempted on to basic briefly physics, include working the historical principle, performancedevelopments. measurements, Broadly, the materials, study provides and current a disc state-of-the-artussion on basic devices. physics, working principle, performance measurements, materials, and current state-of-the-art devices.
Materials 2018, 11, 1433 5 of 45 Materials 2018, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 45
Figure 2. Number of scientific papers published in the field of (a) thermoelectric, (b) Figure 2. Number of scientific papers published in the field of (a) thermoelectric, (b) pyroelectric, pyroelectric, (c) thermomagnetic, and (d) thermoelastic effect from the year 2001 to present. (c) thermomagnetic, and (d) thermoelastic effect from the year 2001 to present. These numbers were These numbers were obtained by searching phrases “thermoelectric”, “pyroelectric”, obtained by searching phrases “thermoelectric”, “pyroelectric”, “thermomagnetic”, and “thermoelastic” “thermomagnetic”,in the title of the articles and on “thermoelastic” Google scholar. in The the actual title of publication the articles on on research Google in scholar. these fields The might actual be publicationhigher than theon research values presented in these here. fields might be higher than the values presented here.
2. Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting 2. Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting Thermoelectric (TE) effect is the resultant of four different phenomena: Joule heating, Thermoelectric (TE) effect is the resultant of four different phenomena: Joule heating, Seebeck effect, Peltier effect, and Thomson effect [23]. Joule heating, also termed as resistive Seebeck effect, Peltier effect, and Thomson effect [23]. Joule heating, also termed as resistive heating, heating, occurs when an electric current flows through an electrical conductor. Joule or occurs when an electric current flows through an electrical conductor. Joule or resistive heat is directly resistive heat is directly proportional to square of the current and the electrical resistance of proportional to square of the current and the electrical resistance of the conductor. The other three the conductor. The other three effects are described in the following sections. effects are described in the following sections.
2.1.2.1. Seebeck Seebeck Effect Effect WhenWhen two dissimilardissimilar electrical electrical conductors conductors or semiconductorsor semiconductors are joined are joined together, together, they make they a makethermocouple a thermocouple and if the and temperature if the temperature difference difference is maintained is maintained between the between two joining the two junctions, joining an junctions,electromotive an forceelectromotive (EMF) is developed force (EMF) (Figure is deve3a). Thisloped phenomenon (Figure 3a). is calledThis phenomenon the Seebeck effect is called and it thewas Seebeck first observed effect by and Thomas it was Johann first observed Seebeck in by 1821. Thomas Thisinduced Johann voltageSeebec isk in called 1821. Seebeck This induced EMF and voltage is called Seebeck EMF and it is directly proportional to the temperature difference. If it is directly proportional to the temperature difference. If Vout is the obtained voltage difference, ∆T is the temperatureis the obtained difference, voltage then difference, the Seebeck ∆ coefficient,T is the temperatureα (also known difference, as thermopower, then thermoelectricthe Seebeck coefficient,power, and thermoelectric (also known sensitivity) as thermopower, is given as [24 thermo,25] electric power, and thermoelectric sensitivity) is given as [24,25] Vout α = (1) ab = (1) ∆∆ T wherewhere subscriptsubscriptab signifies signifies two two conductors, conductors, A and A B, and of the B, thermocouple.of the thermocouple. All materials All exhibitmaterials the exhibitTE effect, the to TE some effect, extent. to some The knownextent. materials The know typicallyn materials have typically a Seebeck have coefficient a Seebeck between coefficient 100 and ◦ ◦ between1000 µV/K. 100 Metal and 1000 such µV/K. as iron Metal has a Seebeck such as coefficient iron has a of Seebeck around 19coefficientµV/ C at of 0 aroundC. Some 19 materials µV/°C atcan 0 °C. also Some have materials a negative can Seebeck also have coefficient. a negati Forve example, Seebeck constantancoefficient. hasFor a example, Seebeck coefficientconstantan of ◦ ◦ has−35 a µSeebeckV/ C at coefficient 0 C. It is important of −35 µV/°C to note at 0 that°C. It these is important specified valuesto note ofthat the these Seebeck specified coefficient values are ◦ ofat 0theC. Seebeck The Seebeck coefficient coefficient are is at a highly0 °C. temperatureThe Seebeck dependent coefficient parameter is a highly and itstemperature value varies ◦ dependentnon-linearly parameter with temperature. and its Mostvalue metals varies exhibit non-line Seebeckarly with coefficients temperature. of 10 µV/ MostC or metals less. However, exhibit ◦ Seebecksemiconductors coefficients have of Seebeck 10 µV/°C coefficients or less. higher Howe thanver, 100semiconductorsµV/ C; therefore, have they Seebeck are commonly coefficients used higherin thermoelectric than 100 modules. µV/°C; Semiconductorstherefore, they having are commonly excess electrons used show in negativethermoelectric a Seebeck modules. coefficient Semiconductorsand are called a n-type having semiconductor. excess electrons On the show other ne hand,gative semiconductors a Seebeck coefficient having excess and are holes called exhibit a n-type semiconductor. On the other hand, semiconductors having excess holes exhibit a positive Seebeck coefficient and are called a p-type semiconductor. The effective Seebeck
Materials 2018, 11, 1433 6 of 45
Materials 2018, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 45 a positive Seebeck coefficient and are called a p-type semiconductor. The effective Seebeck coefficient coefficientof a thermoelectric of a thermoelectric couple consisting couple of one consisti p-typeng and of oneone n-typep-type semiconductor and one n-type elements semiconductor is given as: elements is given as: αpn = αp − αn (2) = − (2)
Figure 3. (a) Seebeck effect: Two thermoelectric materials joined at hot and cold junctions, Figure 3. (a) Seebeck effect: Two thermoelectric materials joined at hot and cold junctions, which are which are maintained at temperatures and (temperature difference Δ = − ). maintained at temperatures Th and Tc (temperature difference ∆T = Th − Tc). Seebeck EMF of Vout is Seebeckobtained EMF across of the junctions; is obtained (b) Peltier across effect: the Twojunctions; thermoelectric (b) Peltier materials effect: joined Two thermoelectric at the two ends. materialsAn electric joined current at ‘I’ the is passed two ends. through An theelectric circuit cu andrrent heat ‘I’q isis passed evolved through at one end the and circuit absorbed and atheat the other; is evolved (c) Thomson at one effect: end and due toabsorbed spatial gradient at the other; in temperature (c) Thomson and effect: current, due a continuous to spatial versiongradient of inthe temperature Peltier effect occurs,and current, resulting a incontinuous Thomsonheat. version of the Peltier effect occurs, resulting in Thomson heat. 2.2. Peltier Effect 2.2. Peltier Effect The Peltier effect is reverse of the Seebeck effect and was first observed by Jean Charles Athanase The Peltier effect is reverse of the Seebeck effect and was first observed by Jean Charles Peltier in 1834. The Peltier effect results in cooling or heating at the junction of two dissimilar Athanase Peltier in 1834. The Peltier effect results in cooling or heating at the junction of two thermoelectric (TE) materials when an electric current is passed through the junction (Figure3b). dissimilar thermoelectric (TE) materials when an electric current is passed through the The magnitude of Peltier heat is directly proportional to the current but its sign (cooling or heating junction (Figure 3b). The magnitude of Peltier heat is directly proportional to the current but effect) depends on the direction of the electric current. The rate of evolved or absorbed heat, q, its sign (cooling or heating effect) depends on the direction of the electric current. The rate of is directly proportional to the electric current in the circuit and is given as [26]: evolved or absorbed heat, , is directly proportional to the electric current in the circuit and is given as [26]: q = (πa − πb)I (3)