Interpretations of the Myth of Andromeda at Iope

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interpretations of the Myth of Andromeda at Iope Syria Archéologie, art et histoire 88 | 2011 Dossier : La Steppe Interpretations of the myth of Andromeda at Iope Ted Kaizer Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/syria/939 DOI: 10.4000/syria.939 ISSN: 2076-8435 Publisher IFPO - Institut français du Proche-Orient Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 2011 Number of pages: 323-339 ISBN: 9782351591871 ISSN: 0039-7946 Electronic reference Ted Kaizer, « Interpretations of the myth of Andromeda at Iope », Syria [Online], 88 | 2011, Online since 01 July 2016, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/syria/939 ; DOI : 10.4000/syria.939 © Presses IFPO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE MYTH OF ANDROMEDA AT IOPE∗ Ted KAIZER 1 Résumé – LeΝ présentΝ articleΝ seΝ proposeΝ d’examinerΝ lesΝ diversesΝ attestations,Ν textuellesΝ etΝ autres,Ν duΝ mytheΝ d’AndromèdeΝàΝIoppé.ΝUneΝétudeΝapprofondieΝetΝcomparativeΝdesΝélémentsΝmisΝenΝœuvreΝpermetΝainsiΝdeΝsaisirΝleΝ processusΝd’élaborationΝdesΝdifférentesΝversionsΝduΝrécit.ΝPlusΝlargement,Νl’exempleΝdeΝlaΝconstructionΝduΝmytheΝ d’Andromède,ΝetΝsaΝlocalisationΝàΝIoppé,ΝenΝparticulier,ΝfaitΝcomprendreΝcommentΝlaΝmultiplicitéΝdesΝinformationsΝ livréesΝparΝlesΝsourcesΝanciennesΝtraduitΝenΝfaitΝdesΝchangementsΝconstantsΝdeΝperspectiveΝdansΝlaΝperceptionΝduΝ passéΝmythologique.Ν Abstract – ThisΝpaperΝaimsΝtoΝdiscussΝtheΝvarietyΝofΝtextualΝandΝotherΝevidenceΝforΝtheΝmythΝofΝAndromedaΝatΝIope.Ν ProvidingΝaΝdetailedΝcompilationΝofΝtheΝrelevantΝmaterial,ΝitΝsetsΝoutΝtoΝinvestigateΝtheΝcompoundΝfactorsΝthatΝmayΝ haveΝhelpedΝtoΝshapeΝtheΝvariousΝversionsΝofΝtheΝstory.ΝAΝfocusΝonΝthisΝspecific case study, in particular with regard toΝtheΝtale’sΝlocationΝatΝIope,ΝwillΝleadΝtoΝfurtherΝrecognitionΝofΝtheΝwayΝinΝwhichΝtheΝmultifariousΝinformationΝ presentedΝinΝtheΝancientΝsourcesΝreflects a constantly developing perception of the mythological past. ﺧﻼﺻﺔ – ºgÉ°ùJh .܃j ‘ Gó«ehQófCG IQƒ£°SCG ¢Uƒ°üîH ,ÉgÒZ ‘ ΩCG ¢Uƒ°üædG ‘ AGƒ°S ,äGOÉ¡°ûdG ´ƒæàH áWÉME’G ¤EG ∫É≤ŸG Gòg ≈©°ùj IQƒ£°SCG êPƒ‰ Ö«côJ íª°ùj ,™°ShCG πµ°ûHh .IQƒ£°SC’G √ò¡H á≤∏©àŸG äÉjGhôdG ∞∏à áZÉ«°U π°ù∏°ùe º¡a ‘ OGƒŸG ∞∏àîŸ á≤ª©e á°SGQO ºLÎj É¡©«ªLh ;…Qƒ£°SC’G »°VÉŸG Gòg øY áÁó≤dG QOÉ°üŸG ‘ IOQGƒdG äÉ«£©ŸG ´ƒæJ ¤EG ¥ô£àdÉH ,܃j ‘ É¡æWƒe ójó–h ,Gó«ehQófCG .ôªà°ùe Qƒ£J ‘ ájDhQ Strabo,ΝwhenΝragingΝinΝtheΝfirst book of his GeographyΝagainstΝthoseΝancientΝscholarsΝwhoΝ‘areΝlessΝ deservingΝofΝcredence,ΝsinceΝinΝadditionΝtoΝtheΝincredibilityΝofΝtheirΝtheoriesΝtheyΝbetrayΝaΝtendencyΝtoΝ confoundΝmythΝandΝhistory’,Ν2ΝstatesΝthatΝ‘thereΝareΝsomeΝwhoΝtransferΝEthiopiaΝalsoΝtoΝourΝPhoenicia,Ν andΝwhoΝsayΝthatΝtheΝadventureΝofΝAndromedaΝtookΝplaceΝinΝIope,ΝthoughΝtheΝstoryΝisΝsurelyΝnotΝtoldΝ ∗ΝThisΝpaperΝoriginatesΝinΝaΝpieceΝpresented,ΝinΝaΝtotallyΝdifferentΝformat,ΝatΝaΝconferenceΝinΝAarhusΝorganisedΝbyΝR.ΝRajaΝinΝ Sept.Ν2008,ΝandΝalsoΝatΝaΝWork-in-ProgressΝseminarΝbackΝhomeΝinΝDurham.ΝIΝamΝalsoΝgratefulΝtoΝR.ΝHäusslerΝforΝinvitingΝmeΝtoΝaΝ colloquiumΝinΝOsnabrückΝinΝSept.Ν2010ΝandΝforΝprovidingΝtheΝopportunityΝtoΝdiscussΝthisΝmaterialΝinΝtheΝcontextΝofΝInterpretatio romana/graeca/indigena.Ν ForΝ referencesΝ andΝ discussionΝ onΝ individualΝ points,Ν thanksΝ areΝ dueΝ toΝ myΝ DurhamΝ colleaguesΝ P.ΝCeccarelli,ΝP.ΝHeslin,ΝJ.ΝIngleheart,ΝandΝM.ΝWoolmer,ΝtoΝS.ΝPasekΝ(duringΝtheΝconferenceΝinΝOsnabrück),ΝtoΝM.ΝBlömer,ΝtoΝ E.ΝGruen,ΝandΝalsoΝtoΝtheΝtwoΝanonymousΝrefereesΝforΝSyria.ΝItΝisΝsuperfluous to state that none of the above is responsible for anyΝremainingΝerrorsΝorΝdoubtfulΝinterpretationsΝonΝmyΝpart.ΝTextsΝandΝtranslationsΝfollowΝLCLΝunlessΝstatedΝotherwise. 1.ΝKaizer,ΝTed,ΝUniversityΝofΝDurham,ΝCentreΝforΝRomanΝCulturalΝStudies,Ν[email protected] 2.Ν StraboΝ 1.2.35Ν [C42]:Ν Υ Υῳ . SyriaΝ88Ν(2011),Νp.Ν323ΝàΝ339 324 T.ΝKAIZER Syria 88Ν(2011) inΝignoranceΝofΝitsΝlocalΝsettingΝbutΝratherΝinΝtheΝguiseΝofΝmyth.’Ν3ΝTheΝexampleΝaccompanyingΝStrabo’sΝ observationΝdealsΝwithΝanΝinterpretationΝofΝanΝancientΝmyth,ΝnamelyΝbyΝassumingΝthatΝthereΝwasΝaΝstandardΝ versionΝofΝtheΝmythΝofΝAndromedaΝwhichΝwasΝlaterΝre-interpretedΝinΝsuchΝaΝwayΝthatΝitΝwasΝre-locatedΝtoΝ Iope,Νmodern-dayΝJaffaΝwhichΝisΝnowΝaΝsuburbΝofΝTelΝAviv.Ν4ΝThisΝpaperΝaimsΝtoΝprovideΝanΝoverviewΝofΝ theΝsourcesΝwhichΝlinkΝtheΝstoryΝtoΝtheΝPalestinianΝportΝtown,ΝandΝtoΝexploreΝ—byΝlookingΝinΝsomeΝdetailΝ atΝtheΝrelevantΝtexts—ΝtheΝmultipleΝfacetsΝthatΝaffectedΝtheΝstory’sΝdifferentΝrenditions. LetΝusΝfirst remind ourselves of the myth according to the ‘standard version’, the basic elements of whichΝareΝtoΝbeΝfoundΝinΝOvid’sΝfamousΝrecitationΝofΝtheΝstoryΝofΝPerseus,Ν5ΝandΝwhichΝisΝofΝcourseΝaboveΝ allΝknownΝfromΝtheΝLibraryΝofΝGreekΝmythology,ΝtraditionallyΝascribedΝtoΝApollodorusΝofΝAthens,ΝbutΝ datingΝfromΝtheΝfirst or second century AD: ‘ArrivingΝ inΝ Ethiopia,Ν whichΝ wasΝ ruledΝ byΝ Cepheus,Ν [Perseus]Ν foundΝ theΝ king’sΝ daughterΝ AndromedaΝexposedΝasΝpreyΝtoΝaΝseaΝmonster;ΝforΝCassiepeia,ΝtheΝwifeΝofΝCepheus,ΝhadΝclaimedΝ toΝrivalΝtheΝNereidsΝinΝbeauty,ΝboastingΝthatΝsheΝsurpassedΝthemΝall.ΝTheΝNereidsΝwereΝenragedΝ byΝthis,ΝandΝPoseidon,ΝwhoΝsharedΝtheirΝanger,ΝsentΝaΝsea-flood and a monster against the land. NowΝAmmonΝhadΝprophesiedΝdeliveranceΝfromΝthisΝcalamityΝifΝCepheus’ΝdaughterΝAndromedaΝ wereΝofferedΝasΝpreyΝtoΝtheΝmonster,ΝandΝcompelledΝbyΝtheΝEthiopians,ΝCepheusΝhadΝdoneΝsoΝandΝ tiedΝhisΝdaughterΝtoΝaΝrock.ΝAsΝsoonΝasΝPerseusΝsawΝher,ΝheΝfellΝinΝlove,ΝandΝpromisedΝCepheusΝ thatΝheΝwouldΝdestroyΝtheΝmonsterΝifΝheΝgaveΝhimΝtheΝrescuedΝgirlΝasΝaΝwife.ΝWhenΝoathsΝhadΝ beenΝswornΝtoΝthisΝeffect,ΝPerseusΝconfrontedΝtheΝmonsterΝandΝkilledΝit,ΝandΝsetΝAndromedaΝ free.ΝPhineus,Νhowever,ΝwhoΝwasΝaΝbrotherΝofΝCepheusΝandΝhadΝbeenΝpromisedΝAndromedaΝ beforehand,ΝplottedΝagainstΝPerseus;ΝbutΝwhenΝPerseusΝlearnedΝofΝtheΝconspiracy,ΝheΝshowedΝtheΝ GorgonΝtoΝPhineusΝandΝhisΝfellowΝplotters,ΝturningΝthemΝtoΝstoneΝonΝtheΝspot.’Ν6 TheΝlocationΝofΝthisΝmythΝatΝIope,ΝatΝwhichΝStraboΝhints,ΝisΝinΝfactΝattestedΝveryΝoftenΝinΝancientΝliteraryΝ sources,ΝandΝseemsΝtoΝhaveΝresultedΝoverΝtimeΝinΝaΝdifferentΝ‘standardΝversion’ΝinΝitsΝownΝright.ΝItΝhasΝ recentlyΝbeenΝargued,ΝinΝaΝstudyΝofΝRomanΝprovincialΝcoinageΝbyΝSimonΝPrice,ΝthatΝinΝcontrastΝtoΝtheΝ RomanΝEastΝatΝlarge,ΝtheΝuseΝofΝGreekΝmythologyΝwasΝnotΝtypicalΝforΝtheΝlandsΝofΝtheΝLevant:Ν“TheΝcivicΝ coinsΝofΝSyriaΝdoΝincludeΝmonumentsΝofΝlocalΝimportance,ΝandΝsometimesΝreferΝtoΝcivicΝfoundations,Ν butΝseemΝnotΝtoΝdrawΝonΝGreekΝmythologicalΝthemes.ΝIfΝthisΝregionalΝdifferenceΝreallyΝexisted,ΝitΝneedsΝ explanation.ΝThisΝmightΝbeΝinΝtermsΝofΝtheΝdifferentΝpositionΝofΝHellenicΝcultureΝinΝSyria,ΝwhereΝtheΝ pastΝthatΝwasΝrecalledΝmostΝwasΝnotΝaΝGreekΝpast.”Ν7ΝButΝifΝitΝisΝundeniableΝthatΝthereΝisΝlessΝevidenceΝ 3.ΝStraboΝ1.2.35Ν[C42-3]:Ν ὼ Υ ὼ ᾶ ῦ Υ Ἀ Υῃ · Υ ὼ ἄ Υ ῦ ὼ ᾶ . 4.ΝThroughoutΝthisΝpaper,ΝIΝstickΝtoΝIope,ΝalthoughΝtheΝtown’sΝnameΝisΝalsoΝwrittenΝdifferently.ΝCf.ΝSCHÜRERΝ1979,Νp.Ν110- 111,Νn.Ν132;ΝBIFFIΝ2002,Νp.Ν216. 5.Ν Cf.Ν Ov.Ν Met.Ν 4.604-803,Ν atΝ 668-71:Ν gentibus innumeris circumque infraque relictis Aethiopum populos Cepheaque conspicit arua. illic immeritam maternae pendere linguae Andromedan poenas iniustus iusserat AmmonΝ(‘passingΝanΝinfinite numberΝofΝcountriesΝaroundΝandΝbelowΝhim,Ν[Perseus]Νfinally sighted the realm of Ethiopian Cepheus, where Ammon, the god ofΝtheΝland,ΝhadΝunjustlyΝorderedΝtheΝprincessΝAndromeda,ΝinnocentΝgirl,ΝtoΝpayΝtheΝpriceΝforΝherΝboastfulΝmotherΝ[whoΝclaimedΝ toΝsurpassΝtheΝdaughtersΝofΝNereusΝinΝbeauty]’).ΝTransl.ΝD.ΝRAEBURNΝ(Penguin). 6.Ν Apollod.Ν Bibl.Ν 2.4.3:Ν Υῦ ῦ Ἀ Υ ῳ . Υ Ν Υ ῦ Υ · Ν ῦ ῖ Υ Υ Υ . Ἄ Υ ᾶῦ Υ Ἀ Υ ῦ Υ Υ Υῦ Υ Υᾳ. Υ ῖ ῦ ῖ ῖ. Υ ῦ Υ Ἀ . Υ ῦ Υ Ἀῦ Υῦ Υ Υ.ΝTransl.ΝR.ΝHARDΝ(OWC). 7.ΝPRICEΝ2005,Νp.Ν120. Syria 88Ν(2011) INTERPRETATIONSΝOFΝTHEΝMYTHΝOFΝANDROMEDAΝATΝIOPE 325 (numismatic,ΝbutΝalsoΝotherwise)ΝfromΝtheΝNearΝEastΝthanΝthereΝisΝfromΝGreeceΝandΝAnatolia,ΝtheΝmythΝ ofΝAndromedaΝatΝIopeΝcannotΝcountΝasΝtheΝsoleΝexceptionΝinΝthisΝcontext.ΝAccordingΝtoΝtheΝEthnicaΝofΝ StephanusΝofΝByzantium,ΝofΝwhichΝonlyΝaΝlateΝepitomeΝsurvives,ΝtheΝtown’sΝGreekΝnameΝcomesΝfromΝ Iope,ΝwhoΝwasΝtheΝdaughterΝofΝÆolus,ΝrulerΝofΝtheΝwinds,ΝandΝtheΝwifeΝofΝCepheus,ΝwhoΝwasΝsaidΝtoΝ haveΝfoundedΝtheΝplace.Ν8ΝTheΝsameΝtraditionΝisΝrecordedΝbyΝtheΝtwelfth-centuryΝscholarΝEustathius,ΝinΝ hisΝCommentary on Dionysius Periegetes,ΝwhoΝwritesΝthatΝtheΝtownΝwasΝnamedΝeitherΝafterΝthatΝsameΝ Iope,ΝorΝafterΝIo.Ν9ΝSimilarly,ΝtheΝnamesΝofΝIope’sΝneighbouringΝcities,ΝDoraΝandΝAscalon,ΝcanΝbeΝlinkedΝ withΝclassicalΝmythologicalΝfigures, Poseidon’s son Doros and Tantalus’ brother Ascalos respectively. IopeΝisΝthenΝsimply,ΝinΝtheΝwordsΝofΝMauriceΝSartre,ΝoneΝofΝtheΝexamplesΝfromΝtheΝNearΝEastΝthatΝshowsΝ howΝ“l’œuvreΝdesΝmythographesΝétaitΝdeΝpremièreΝimportanceΝetΝcontribuaitΝefficacement à doter d’un passéΝmythiqueΝgrecΝdeΝvieillesΝvillesΝindigènes,ΝdontΝl’insertionΝdansΝleΝnouveauΝmondeΝseΝtrouvaitΝ ainsiΝfacilitée.”Ν10ΝIfΝthereΝwasΝaΝregionalΝdifferenceΝ(betweenΝAsiaΝMinorΝandΝtheΝLevant)ΝwithΝregardΝtoΝ theΝapplicationΝofΝGreekΝmythologicalΝthemesΝonΝcoins,Ν11ΝthatΝmayΝhaveΝbeenΝlessΝtheΝcaseΝwithΝregardΝ toΝ cities’ΝclaimsΝ ofΝ beingΝ namedΝ afterΝ GreekΝ mythologicalΝ figures, and even less so concerning the knowledgeΝandΝapplicationΝofΝHellenismΝinΝtheΝNearΝEasternΝlandsΝinΝgeneral.Ν12ΝFocussingΝonΝtheΝmythΝ ofΝAndromedaΝatΝIopeΝwillΝallowΝusΝtoΝappreciateΝhowΝtheΝsnippetsΝofΝmythologicalΝinformationΝgivenΝ byΝtheΝvariousΝauthorsΝcanΝbeΝviewedΝasΝreflections of a continuously developing consciousness of the mythologicalΝpast,ΝandΝtoΝbeΝawareΝofΝtheΝdynamicΝmeansΝbyΝwhichΝanΝapparentlyΝclassicalΝmythΝcouldΝ
Recommended publications
  • TITLE: Pomponius Mela's World Map DATE: A.D. 37 AUTHOR: Pomponius Mela
    Pomponius Mela’s World View #116 TITLE: Pomponius Mela’s World Map DATE: A.D. 37 AUTHOR: Pomponius Mela DESCRIPTION: The images in this monograph show attempts at reconstruction of the world view of the earliest Roman geographer Pomponius Mela, who, although of Spanish birth, wrote a brief work which agrees in most of its views with the great Greek writers from Eratosthenes (#112) to Strabo (#115). However, Mela departs from the traditional ancient concept by asserting that in the southern temperate zone dwelt inhabitants who were inaccessible to Europeans because of the Torrid Zone that intervened. His knowledge of the characters of Western Europe and the British Isles was clearer than that of the Greek writers, and he was the first to name the Orcades [Orkney Islands]. The great Roman historian Pliny quoted Mela as an authority. The first-century author Pomponius Mela enjoyed a long- standing reputation in geographical matters, given Pliny’s praise of him in the Natural History. But no text by Mela was known until the 1330s, when Petrarch discovered his De chorographia [On Chorography, or Descriptive Geography] in Avignon. Mela did not include a map in his text, but it has been suggested that he had in mind the map of the known world that Agrippa (#118) had started and Augustus completed. Displayed in the Porticus Vipsania in Rome, this map was known as chorographia, a name possibly recalled by the title of Mela’s text. Petrarch was fascinated with Mela’s brief and engaging text and had copies made for fellow humanists, including Giovanni Boccaccio, facilitating the wide circulation of the manuscript for almost a century, until it was printed in Milan in 1471.
    [Show full text]
  • OVID Metamorphoses
    Metamorphoses Ovid, Joseph D. Reed, Rolfe Humphries Published by Indiana University Press Ovid, et al. Metamorphoses: The New, Annotated Edition. Indiana University Press, 2018. Project MUSE. muse.jhu.edu/book/58757. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/58757 [ Access provided at 20 May 2021 05:17 GMT from University of Washington @ Seattle ] book FIve The Fighting of Perseus* So Perseus told his story, and the halls Buzzed loud, not with the cheery noise that rings From floor to rafter at a wedding-party. No; this meant trouble. It was like the riot When sudden squalls lash peaceful waves to surges. Phineus was the reckless one to start it, That warfare, brandishing his spear of ash With sharp bronze point. “Look at me! Here I am,” He cried, “Avenger of my stolen bride! No wings will save you from me, and no god Turned into lying gold.”* He poised the spear, As Cepheus shouted: “Are you crazy, brother? What are you doing? Is this our gratitude, This our repayment for a maiden saved? If truth is what you want, it was not Perseus Who took her from you, but the Nereids Whose power is terrible, it was hornèd Ammon, It was that horrible monster from the ocean Who had to feed on my own flesh and blood, And that was when you really lost her, brother; 107 lines 20–47 She would have died—can your heart be so cruel To wish it so, to heal its grief by causing Grief in my heart? It was not enough, I take it, For you to see her bound and never help her, Never so much as lift a little finger, And you her uncle and her promised husband! So now you grieve that someone else did save her, You covet his reward, a prize so precious, It seems, you could not force yourself to take it From the rocks where it was bound.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Monsters in Antiquity: a Classical and Zoological Investigation
    Sea Monsters in Antiquity: A Classical and Zoological Investigation Alexander L. Jaffe Harvard University Dept. of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Class of 2015 Abstract: Sea monsters inspired both fascination and fear in the minds of the ancients. In this paper, I aim to examine several traditional monsters of antiquity with a multi-faceted approach that couples classical background with modern day zoological knowledge. Looking at the examples of the ketos and the sea serpent in Roman and Greek societies, I evaluate the scientific bases for representations of these monsters across of variety of media, from poetry to ceramics. Through the juxtaposition of the classical material and modern science, I seek to gain a greater understanding of the ancient conception of sea monsters and explain the way in which they were rationalized and depicted by ancient cultures. A closer look at extant literature, historical accounts, and artwork also helps to reveal a human sentiment towards the ocean and its denizens penetrating through time even into the modern day. “The Sea-monsters, mighty of limb and huge, the wonders of the sea, heavy with strength invincible, a terror for the eyes to behold and ever armed with deadly rage—many of these there be that roam the spacious seas...”1 Oppian, Halieutica 1 As the Greek poet Oppian so eloquently reveals, sea monsters inspired both fascination and fear in the minds of the ancients. From the Old Testament to Ovid, sources from throughout the ancient world show authors exercising both imagination and observation in the description of these creatures. Mythology as well played a large role in the creation of these beliefs, with such classic examples as Perseus and Andromeda or Herakles and Hesione.
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Myths Has Exciting and Sometimes Tragic Guides for Gods and Heroes
    TEACHER’S GUIDE TEACHER’S GUIDE TEACHER’S GUIDE Follow-up Activities • www.pantheon.org Encyclopedia Mythica supplies definitions, images, and pronunciation • This collection of constellation myths has exciting and sometimes tragic guides for gods and heroes. events happening at the beginning, middle, and endings of their stories. • www.mythweb.com/encyc/index.html Pretend you are a news reporter called to the scene of one of these Look up your favorite Greek character in this encyclopedia of Greek events. Develop a list of “who,”“what,”“where,”“why” and “how” ques- mythology. tions to ask one of the characters.With a partner, take turns asking and • www.mythman.com recording answers about the tragic or exciting event.Write it up as a A humorous homework help site for students with classical myth “breaking news” story. retellings. • There are many variations and mythological beings in constellation and nature myths. Have students research, compare, and contrast other ver- Suggested Print Resources sions of these tales. Use Bulfinch’s Mythology by Thomas Bulfinch • Andrews,Tamra. Dictionary of Nature Myths: Legends of the Earth, Sea, (Random House, 1998) to discover alternate stories. and Sky. Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY; 2000. • Students can research other stars and planets named after characters in • D’Aulaire, Ingri and Edgar Parin D’Aulaire. Ingri and Edgar Parin Greek mythology. Have them find out why the beautiful Pleiades, the D’Aulaire’s Book of Greek Myths. Doubleday, Garden City, NY; 1962. One CONSTELLATION MYTHS seven daughters of Atlas, are placed as stars in front of the Orion con- of the best-loved classical collections of Greek mythology.
    [Show full text]
  • Elusive European Monsters Alli Starry
    1 SELKIE Seal by sea and sheds its skin to walk on land in human form. This creature comes from the Irish and Scottish and Faroese folklore to keep their women cautious of men from the sea. 0 375 750 Km 9 KELPIE 2 PHOUKA N A shapeshifting water spirit in the lochs and A shapeshifting goblin sighted by the top of rivers of Scotland. The kelpie is told to warn the River Liffey. Takes drunkards on a wild children away from dangerous waters and women night ride and dumps them in random places. 6 to be wary of strangers. The Kelpie commonly Can be a nice excuse for a takes the shape of a horse with backwards hooves night at the pub. as it carries off its victims. 5 1 3 9 2 8 8 BOLOT N IK 4 A swamp monster originating from Poland. The Bolotnik pretends to be a stepping LOCH NESS 3 stone in a swamp when people pass through, then MON STER moves; causing its victims to fall into the mud where they can then be devoured. Legend has it that Loch Ness, Scotland has plesiosaur living in its depths. Affectionately named Nessie, a fisherman once 7 CET US spotted her surfacing the 7 Cetus is a sea monster from Greek Mythology. loch and Cetus is a mix between the sea serpent and a snapped a Map By: Alli Starry Monster information from Wikipedia whale. Its tale has been passed down through fuzzy picture. Pictures from deviantart.com the ages of Grecian folktales. It now resides World Mercator Projection; WKID: 54004 among the stars as a constellation.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANIZATION and SOME CILICIAN CULTS by HUGH ELTON (BIAA)
    ROMANIZATION AND SOME CILICIAN CULTS By HUGH ELTON (BIAA) This paper focuses on two sites from central Cilicia in Anatolia, the Cory­ cian Cave and Kanhdivane, to make some comments about religion and Romanization. From the Corycian Cave, a pair of early third-century AD altars are dedicated to Zeus Korykios, described as Victorious (Epinikios), Triumphant (Tropaiuchos), and the Harvester (Epikarpios), and to Hermes Korykios, also Victorious, Triumphant, and the Harvester. The altars were erected for 'the fruitfulness and brotherly love of the Augusti', suggesting they come from the period before Geta's murder, i.e. between AD 209 and 212. 1 These altars are unremarkable and similar examples are common else­ where, so these altars can be interpreted as showing the homogenising effect of the Roman Empire. But behind these dedications, however, may lie a re­ ligious tradition stretching back to the second millennium BC. At the second site, Kanhdivane, a tomb in the west necropolis was accompanied by a fu­ nerary inscription erected by Marcus Ulpius Knos for himself and his family, probably in the second century AD. Marcus then added, 'but if anyone damages or opens [the tomb] let him pay to the treasury of Zeus 1000 [de­ narii] and to the Moon (Selene) and to the Sun (Helios) above 1000 [denarii] and let him be subject to the curses also of the Underground Gods (Kata­ chthoniai Theoi). ' 2 When he wanted to threaten retribution, Knos turned to a local group of gods. As at the Corycian Cave, Knos' actions may preserve traces of pre-Roman practices, though within a Roman framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Hesiod Theogony.Pdf
    Hesiod (8th or 7th c. BC, composed in Greek) The Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are probably slightly earlier than Hesiod’s two surviving poems, the Works and Days and the Theogony. Yet in many ways Hesiod is the more important author for the study of Greek mythology. While Homer treats cer- tain aspects of the saga of the Trojan War, he makes no attempt at treating myth more generally. He often includes short digressions and tantalizes us with hints of a broader tra- dition, but much of this remains obscure. Hesiod, by contrast, sought in his Theogony to give a connected account of the creation of the universe. For the study of myth he is im- portant precisely because his is the oldest surviving attempt to treat systematically the mythical tradition from the first gods down to the great heroes. Also unlike the legendary Homer, Hesiod is for us an historical figure and a real per- sonality. His Works and Days contains a great deal of autobiographical information, in- cluding his birthplace (Ascra in Boiotia), where his father had come from (Cyme in Asia Minor), and the name of his brother (Perses), with whom he had a dispute that was the inspiration for composing the Works and Days. His exact date cannot be determined with precision, but there is general agreement that he lived in the 8th century or perhaps the early 7th century BC. His life, therefore, was approximately contemporaneous with the beginning of alphabetic writing in the Greek world. Although we do not know whether Hesiod himself employed this new invention in composing his poems, we can be certain that it was soon used to record and pass them on.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Measure: Caesar's Geographies of Gallia and Britannia in Their Contexts and As Evidence of His World Map
    The World's Measure: Caesar's Geographies of Gallia and Britannia in their Contexts and as Evidence of his World Map Christopher B. Krebs American Journal of Philology, Volume 139, Number 1 (Whole Number 553), Spring 2018, pp. 93-122 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2018.0003 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/687618 Access provided at 25 Oct 2019 22:25 GMT from Stanford Libraries THE WORLD’S MEASURE: CAESAR’S GEOGRAPHIES OF GALLIA AND BRITANNIA IN THEIR CONTEXTS AND AS EVIDENCE OF HIS WORLD MAP CHRISTOPHER B. KREBS u Abstract: Caesar’s geographies of Gallia and Britannia as set out in the Bellum Gallicum differ in kind, the former being “descriptive” and much indebted to the techniques of Roman land surveying, the latter being “scientific” and informed by the methods of Greek geographers. This difference results from their different contexts: here imperialist, there “cartographic.” The geography of Britannia is ultimately part of Caesar’s (only passingly and late) attested great cartographic endeavor to measure “the world,” the beginning of which coincided with his second British expedition. To Tony Woodman, on the occasion of his retirement as Basil L. Gildersleeve Professor of Classics at the University of Virginia, in gratitude. IN ALEXANDRIA AT DINNER with Cleopatra, Caesar felt the sting of curiosity. He inquired of “the linen-wearing Acoreus” (linigerum . Acorea, Luc. 10.175), a learned priest of Isis, whether he would illuminate him on the lands and peoples, gods and customs of Egypt. Surely, Lucan has him add, there had never been “a visitor more capable of the world” than he (mundique capacior hospes, 10.183).
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of Curricula for the STARLAB Greek Mythology Cylinder
    A Collection of Curricula for the STARLAB Greek Mythology Cylinder Including: A Look at the Greek Mythology Cylinder Three Activities: Constellation Creations, Create a Myth, I'm Getting Dizzy by Gary D. Kratzer ©2008 by Science First/STARLAB, 95 Botsford Place, Buffalo, NY 14216. www.starlab.com. All rights reserved. Curriculum Guide Contents A Look at the Greek Mythology Cylinder ...................3 Leo, the Lion .....................................................9 Introduction ......................................................3 Lepus, the Hare .................................................9 Andromeda ......................................................3 Libra, the Scales ................................................9 Aquarius ..........................................................3 Lyra, the Lyre ...................................................10 Aquila, the Eagle ..............................................3 Ophuichus, Serpent Holder ..............................10 Aries, the Ram ..................................................3 Orion, the Hunter ............................................10 Auriga .............................................................4 Pegasus, the Winged Horse..............................11 Bootes ..............................................................4 Perseus, the Champion .....................................11 Cancer, the Crab ..............................................4 Phoenix ..........................................................11 Canis Major, the Big Dog
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Evolution Through Uv Surveys (Cetus) Final Report
    COSMIC EVOLUTION THROUGH UV SURVEYS (CETUS) FINAL REPORT Thematic Activity: Project (probe mission concept) Program: Electromagnetic observations from space Authors of Final Report: Jonathan Arenberg, Northrop Grumman Corporation Sally Heap, Univ. of Maryland, [email protected] Tony Hull, Univ. of New Mexico Steve Kendrick, Kendrick Aerospace Consulting LLC Bob Woodruff, Woodruff Consulting Scientific Contributors: Maarten Baes, Rachel Bezanson, Luciana Bianchi, David Bowen, Brad Cenko, Yi-Kuan Chiang, Rachel Cochrane, Mike Corcoran, Paul Crowther, Simon Driver, Bill Danchi, Eli Dwek, Brian Fleming, Kevin France, Pradip Gatkine, Suvi Gezari, Lea Hagen, Chris Hayward, Matthew Hayes, Tim Heckman, Edmund Hodges-Kluck, Alexander Kutyrev, Thierry Lanz, John MacKenty, Steve McCandliss, Harvey Moseley, Coralie Neiner, Goren Östlin, Camilla Pacifici, Marc Rafelski, Bernie Rauscher, Jane Rigby, Ian Roederer, David Spergel, Dan Stark, Alexander Szalay, Bryan Terrazas, Jonathan Trump, Arjun van der Wel, Sylvain Veilleux, Kate Whitaker, Isak Wold, Rosemary Wyse Technical Contributors: Jim Burge, Kelly Dodson, Chip Eckles, Brian Fleming, Jamie Kennea, Gerry Lemson, John MacKenty, Steve McCandliss, Greg Mehle, Shouleh Nikzad, Trent Newswander, Lloyd Purves, Manuel Quijada, Ossy Siegmund, Dave Sheikh, Phil Stahl, Ani Thakar, John Vallerga, Marty Valente, the Goddard IDC/MDL. September 2019 Cosmic Evolution Through UV Surveys (CETUS) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO CETUS ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Mythology
    Greek Mythology The Creation Myth “First Chaos came into being, next wide bosomed Gaea(Earth), Tartarus and Eros (Love). From Chaos came forth Erebus and black Night. Of Night were born Aether and Day (whom she brought forth after intercourse with Erebus), and Doom, Fate, Death, sleep, Dreams; also, though she lay with none, the Hesperides and Blame and Woe and the Fates, and Nemesis to afflict mortal men, and Deceit, Friendship, Age and Strife, which also had gloomy offspring.”[11] “And Earth first bore starry Heaven (Uranus), equal to herself to cover her on every side and to be an ever-sure abiding place for the blessed gods. And earth brought forth, without intercourse of love, the Hills, haunts of the Nymphs and the fruitless sea with his raging swell.”[11] Heaven “gazing down fondly at her (Earth) from the mountains he showered fertile rain upon her secret clefts, and she bore grass flowers, and trees, with the beasts and birds proper to each. This same rain made the rivers flow and filled the hollow places with the water, so that lakes and seas came into being.”[12] The Titans and the Giants “Her (Earth) first children (with heaven) of Semi-human form were the hundred-handed giants Briareus, Gyges, and Cottus. Next appeared the three wild, one-eyed Cyclopes, builders of gigantic walls and master-smiths…..Their names were Brontes, Steropes, and Arges.”[12] Next came the “Titans: Oceanus, Hypenon, Iapetus, Themis, Memory (Mnemosyne), Phoebe also Tethys, and Cronus the wily—youngest and most terrible of her children.”[11] “Cronus hated his lusty sire Heaven (Uranus).
    [Show full text]
  • The Petrifying Gaze of Medusa: Ambivalence, Ekplexis, and the Sublime
    Volume 8, Issue 2 (Summer 2016) The Petrifying Gaze of Medusa: Ambivalence, Ekplexis, and the Sublime Caroline van Eck [email protected] Recommended Citation: Caroline van Eck, “The Sublime and the “The Petrifying Gaze of Medusa: Ambivalence, Ekplexis, and the Sublime,” JHNA 8:2 (Summer 2016), DOI: 10.5092/jhna.2016.8.2.3 Available at https://jhna.org/articles/petrifying-gaze-medusa-ambivalence-explexis-sublime/ Published by Historians of Netherlandish Art: https://hnanews.org/ Republication Guidelines: https://jhna.org/republication-guidelines/ Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. This PDF provides paragraph numbers as well as page numbers for citation purposes. ISSN: 1949-9833 JHNA 7:2 (Summer 2015) 1 THE PETRIFYING GAZE OF MEDUSA: AMBIVALENCE, EKPLEXIS, AND THE SUBLIME Caroline van Eck The Dutch art theorists Junius and van Hoogstraten describe the sublime, much more explicitly and insistently than in Longinus’s text, as the power of images to petrify the viewer and to stay fixed in their memory. This effect can be related to Longinus’s distinction between poetry and prose. Prose employs the strategy of enargeia; poetry that of ekplexis, or shattering the listener or reader. This essay traces the notion of ekplexis in Greek rhetoric, particularly in Hermogenes, and shows the connections in etymology, myth, and pictorial traditions, between the petrifying powers of art and the myth of Medusa. DOI: 10.5092/jhna.2016.8.2.3 Introduction Fig. 1 Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640), Medusa, ca.
    [Show full text]