The History of the Pyrethroid Insecticides

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The history of the pyrethroid insecticides The synthetic pyrethroid insecticides were defences against insect pests. For thousands Compared to natural pyrethrins, the synthetic Early landmarks in the discovery of the developed at Rothamsted Research, which of years they have been extracted and used The development of the synthetic pyrethroids are more stable in direct sunlight. synthetic pyrethroids receives strategic funding from BBSRC, in the to combat insect pests. However, the natural They are also signifi antly more effective against pyrethroids at Rothamsted was led 1960s and 1970s. Today they account for around pyrethrins are not particularly effective when a wider range of insects, so farmers need to apply • Pyrethrin insecticides from pyrethrum daisies one sixth of global insecticide sales1, and global used on fields of crops as th y are quite unstable, by Michael Elliott. Elliott joined the less insecticide to their crops. This also means (Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium) have been used in various forms for thousands of years. They were annual sales of pyrethorids exceed US$1.4Bn. breaking down quickly when exposed to sunlight. institute in 1948 to investigate the pyrethroids are less likely to build up to dangerous originally discovered in China and imported into Europe They are also used to impregnate bed nets, which link between molecular structure levels in the environment2. as ‘Persian powder’. help to reduce the spread of malaria as part of To overcome their limitations, scientists developed and biological activity in the the World Health Organisation’s Global Malaria synthetic compounds, called pyrethroid natural pyrethrins. He used this However, pyrethroids can harm some beneficial • Hermann Staudinger and Lavoslav Ružička published a Programme. insecticides, based on the chemistry of the insects such as bees or the parasitic wasps that definiti e study on the structure of natural pyrethrins in knowledge to create the synthetic 4 natural pyrethrins. Both work by targeting prey on pests, and they are also toxic to fish and 1924 . pyrethroids. Elliott won numerous The science of pyrethroids sodium channels in the cell membranes of insect other aquatic organisms. Because humans possess • Pest control research at Rothamsted began before the Natural pyrethrins are derived from nervous systems. By locking these channels open, awards over the course of his enzymes that quickly break down pyrethroid Second World War when other pest control options Chrysanthemums, the same genus as common the pyrethroids block normal nerve impulses, career, and received a CBE in 1982. insecticides, the pyrethroids are only toxic to people often relied on arsenic or cyanide. Work on plant daisies, and are an important component of plant paralysing the insect and ultimately killing it1. in large quantities or over long periods of time3. breeding near Rothamsted in the 1920s supported the establishment of the pyrethrum industry in Kenya. 1940 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1949 1962 1972 1980s 2002 2011 The first ynthetic pyrethroids, allethrin and In the UK, Michael Elliott creates resmethrin, Michael Elliott develops permethrin, the Professor Chris Curtis at the London School Deltamethrin is the world’s highest-selling The WHO recommends the use of 12 long- bioallethrin, are developed in America by a ‘first gene ation’ synthetic pyrethroid, by first field- able pyrethroid. It is much more of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine begins pyrethroid with annual sales worth US$208M lasting insecticidal mosquito nets to tackle Milton S. Schechter and colleagues5,6. They altering the molecular structure of naturally- suitable for use in agricultural settings as it to investigate the potential of insecticide- (around £132M)18. malaria. The nets all rely on pyrethroids are around twenty times more effective at occurring pyrethrin. At the time such structure- does not break down so quickly in sunlight2. treated bed nets to control malaria. He developed at Rothamsted22. killing insects than DDT without the serious activity studies were not common practice. The development of permethrin leads to a campaigns for aid agencies to distribute 2004 environmental or health impacts7. second round of licensing deals with the agro- the nets for free to communities in affected BBSRC-funded researchers at Rothamsted, Resmethrin, named in honour of the chemical industry. regions to help reduce mosquito numbers working with Australian colleagues, develop a Rothamsted Experimental Station in and lifespan10. product to overcome resistance to pyrethroid Harpenden, UK, where the discovery was 1972 insecticides that is appearing in several made, is much more effective against DDT is banned in the US following growing 1983 insect crop pests. Their product first release houseflies than natu al pyrethrins. However, it concerns about bioaccumulation and its Pyrethroids make up 25.1% of the global an enzyme inhibitor to disable the insect’s is still unstable in sunlight and unsuitable for persistence in the environment. Because they insecticide market and 33 million hectares resistance mechanism. Several hours later use outdoors8. break down in sunlight, pyrethroids do not of crops are treated with pyrethroids it releases the insecticide, which kills the accumulate in the same way. annually11. Pyrethroids developed by Elliott insect19. 1967 and colleagues at Rothamsted constitute two 1991 11 Elliott produces another first gene ation thirds of the global pyrethroid market . An MRC-funded study shows that using 2007 pyrethroid, bioresmethrin, by isolating one of insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs) in Pyrethroids account for 17% of global 1 the active compounds from resmethrin. 1984 a rural region of the Gambia can reduce the insecticide sales . Total global sales of 11 20 Michael Elliott retires from Rothamsted . number of deaths of children under the age insecticides are around $8Bn . Bioresmethrin is a single isomer of resmethrin, Around one quarter of the profits made by UK of fi e by around two-thirds15. The ITNs used which exists as a mixture of four different firm Mi chell Cotts this year are attributed to in the study were treated with permethrin. 2009 isomers, i.e. compounds with identical the sale of pyrethroid insecticides13. Mitchell A Cochrane Collaboration review of earlier molecular formulas but with different shapes. Cotts were one of the original licencees for Early 1990s trials confirms that ITNs reduce death At the time, other compounds with several pyrethroids. Sales of synthetic pyrethroids reach amongst children under fi e by around isomers were produced as a mixture, but US$1.2Bn per year9. one fifth. Th y also signifi antly reduce the the agro-chemical companies, working Late 1980s incidence of illness caused by malaria21. alongside Rothamsted scientists, were able to The World Health Organisation (WHO) 1998 8 manufacture just the bioresmethrin isomer . recommends using pyrethroids developed New long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), at Rothamsted, including deltamethrin and which use pyrethroids such as cypermethrim, 14 Late 1960s permethrin, for ITNs . Pyrethroids are the form one of four pillars to tackle malaria in The first gene ation synthetic pyrethroids are 1976 only class of insecticides recommended for Japanese chemical company Sumitomo the World Health Organisation’s international supported and commercially exploited by the use in such nets due to their low toxicity to 16, 17 independently discovers fenvalerate. Elliott Roll Back Malaria Programme . National Research Development Corporation humans and other mammals. Their physical becomes aware of the development of the (NRDC), a group established by HM Treasury properties also mean manufacturers can work through his colleague Professor Izuru to commercialise the outputs of UK research, easily incorporate pyrethroids into the fibre Yamamoto in Japan and through the patents and its successor, the British Technology Group. used to make bed nets. filed y the company. He realises he can build An initial licensing deal is agreed by NRDC with on their success in his own work. six companies (Mitchell Cotts, the Wellcome Foundation, Roussel Uclaf, Sumitomo, FMC The results are two new pyrethroids, and Penick) interested in manufacturing and cypermethrin and deltamethrin, the latter in selling pyrethroids9. particular is an extremely potent insecticide8. The history of the pyrethroid insecticides Notes and References Thanks to Professor John Pickett and Professor Bhupinder Khambay for providing much of the historical information about the work of Dr Michael Elliott at Rothamsted Research, and for their comments on a draft of this case study. 1. Davies, T.G., Field, L.M., Usherwood, P.N., & Williamson, M.S. (2007). DDT, pyrethrins, pyrethroids and insect sodium channels. IUBMB Life. 59(3), pp151-162. doi: 10.1080/15216540701352042. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17487686 2 Elliott, M., (1976). Properties and Applications of Pyrethroids. Environmental Health Perspectives. 14, pp 3 – 13. Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475105/ 3. Mikata, K., Isobe, N., Kaneko, H. (2012) Biotransformation and enzymatic reactions of synthetic pyrethroids in mammals. Topics in Current Chemistry. 314, pp 113 – 135. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21952844 4. Staudinger, H. und Ruzicka, L. (1924). “Über die wirksamen Bestandteile des dalmatinischen Insektenpulvers”. Helv chim acta. 7: 177. doi:10.1002/hlca.19240070124. 5. Obituaries: Milton
Recommended publications
  • Restricted Use Product Summary Report

    Restricted Use Product Summary Report

    Page 1 of 17 Restricted Use Product Summary Report (January 19, 2016) Percent Active Registration # Name Company # Company Name Active Ingredient(s) Ingredient 4‐152 BONIDE ORCHARD MOUSE BAIT 4 BONIDE PRODUCTS, INC. 2 Zinc phosphide (Zn3P2) 70‐223 RIGO EXOTHERM TERMIL 70 VALUE GARDENS SUPPLY, LLC 20 Chlorothalonil 100‐497 AATREX 4L HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 42.6 Atrazine 100‐585 AATREX NINE‐O HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 88.2 Atrazine 100‐669 CURACRON 8E INSECTICIDE‐MITICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 73 Profenofos 100‐817 BICEP II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐827 BICEP LITE II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 28.1; 35.8 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐886 BICEP MAGNUM 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33.7; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐898 AGRI‐MEK 0.15 EC MITICIDE/INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2 Abamectin 100‐903 DENIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2.15 Emamectin benzoate 100‐904 PROCLAIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 5 Emamectin benzoate 100‐998 KARATE 1EC 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1075 FORCE 3G INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 3 Tefluthrin Acetochlor; Carbamothioic acid, dipropyl‐ 100‐1083 DOUBLEPLAY SELECTIVE HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 16.9; 67.8 , S‐ethyl ester 100‐1086 KARATE EC‐W INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1088 SCIMITAR GC INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION,
  • Cypermethrin

    Cypermethrin

    International Environmental Health Criteria 82 Cypermethrin Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GENEVA 1989 Other titles available in the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA series include: 1. Mercury 2. Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Terphenyls 3. Lead 4. Oxides of Nitrogen 5. Nitrates, Nitrites, and N-Nitroso Compounds 6. Principles and Methods for Evaluating the Toxicity of Chemicals, Part 1 7. Photochemical Oxidants 8. Sulfur Oxides and Suspended Particulate Matter 9. DDT and its Derivatives 10. Carbon Disulfide 11. Mycotoxins 12. Noise 13. Carbon Monoxide 14. Ultraviolet Radiation 15. Tin and Organotin Compounds 16. Radiofrequency and Microwaves 17. Manganese 18. Arsenic 19. Hydrogen Sulfide 20. Selected Petroleum Products 21. Chlorine and Hydrogen Chloride 22. Ultrasound 23. Lasers and Optical Radiation 24. Titanium 25. Selected Radionuclides 26. Styrene 27. Guidelines on Studies in Environmental Epidemiology 28. Acrylonitrile 29. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) 30. Principles for Evaluating Health Risks to Progeny Associated with Exposure to Chemicals during Pregnancy 31. Tetrachloroethylene 32. Methylene Chloride 33. Epichlorohydrin 34. Chlordane 35. Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Fields 36. Fluorine and Fluorides 37. Aquatic (Marine and Freshwater) Biotoxins 38. Heptachlor 39. Paraquat and Diquat 40. Endosulfan 41. Quintozene 42. Tecnazene 43. Chlordecone 44. Mirex continued on p. 156
  • Treatments for the Protection of Stored Southern-Grown Corn from Rice Weevil Attack — Exploratory Tests ~

    Treatments for the Protection of Stored Southern-Grown Corn from Rice Weevil Attack — Exploratory Tests ~

    Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific l<nowledge, policies, or practices. C~1 ^^ i -»T f-W-t-^-m-—, y>/^ .'3 L i B R •:i;RPEin SERIAL KLUu.^. Marketing Research Report No.272 L- nr.T2 7lS58 '.' S. uEFARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Treatments for the Protection of Stored Southern-Grown Corn from Rice Weevil Attack — Exploratory Tests ~ Marketing Research Division Agricultural Marketing Service U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WARNING No tolerances have been established for the use of lindane, methoxychlor, or ryania as insecticidal applications to the entire bulk of stored grain for the prevention of insect infestation. The tests reported herein were exploratory studies to develop information that could be used in considering the establishment of tolerances. Until such tolerances are announced, lindane, methoxychlor, or ryania protective treatments should not be used. A tolerance of 2 p. p.m. for methoxychlor in grain permits the spraying of bin walls and some surface applications, but is not high enough to cover protective treat- ments in the sense considered here. CONTENTS Page Summary 1 Introduction 2 Techniques 2 Tests with lindane 4 Tests with malathion 6 Tests with methoxychlor 8 Tests with synergized pyrethrum 12 Tests with ryania 16 Findings 19 Washington, D. C. September 1958 sale For by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 15 cents TREATMENTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF STORED SOUTHERN-GROWN CORN FROM RICE WEEVIL ATTACK—EXPLORATORY TESTS By D. W. La Hue, Herbert Womack, and B. W. Clements, Jr. Stored-Product Insects Laboratory- Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station Tifton, Ga.-"- SUMMARY Exploratory studies were made at Tifton, Ga.
  • Characterization of Residential Pest Control Products Used in Inner City Communities in New York City

    Characterization of Residential Pest Control Products Used in Inner City Communities in New York City

    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2010), 1–11 r 2010 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/10 www.nature.com/jes Characterization of residential pest control products used in inner city communities in New York City MEGAN K. HORTONa, J. BRYAN JACOBSONb, WENDY MCKELVEYb, DARRELL HOLMESa, BETTY FINCHERc, AUDREY QUANTANOc, BEINVENDIDA PAEZ DIAZc, FAYE SHABBAZZc, PEGGY SHEPARDc, ANDREW RUNDLEa AND ROBIN M. WHYATTa aColumbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA bNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York, USA cWest Harlem Environmental Action, New York, New York, USA The Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health (CCCEH) previously reported widespread residential insecticide use in urban communities in New York City. Research suggests that pyrethroids are replacing organophosphates (OPs) in response to 2000–2001 US EPA pesticide regulations restricting OP use. A systematic assessment of active ingredients used for residential pest control is lacking. We queried a database of pesticide applications reported by licensed applicators between 1999 and 2005 and surveyed pest control products available in 145 stores within 29 zip codes in the CCCEH catchment area including Northern Manhattan and the South Bronx. Pyrethroids, pyrethrins, piperonyl butoxide, and hydramethylnon were the most common insecticide active ingredients reported as used by licensed pesticide applicators within the 29 zip codes of the CCCEH catchment area between 1999 and 2005. Use of certain pyrethroids and some non-spray insecticides such as fipronil and boric acid increased significantly by year (logistic regression, OR41.0, Po0.05), whereas use of OPs, including chlorpyrifos and diazinon decreased significantly by year (logistic regression, ORo1.0, Po0.05).
  • Evaluation of Fluralaner and Afoxolaner Treatments to Control Flea

    Evaluation of Fluralaner and Afoxolaner Treatments to Control Flea

    Dryden et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:365 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1654-7 RESEARCH Open Access Evaluation of fluralaner and afoxolaner treatments to control flea populations, reduce pruritus and minimize dermatologic lesions in naturally infested dogs in private residences in west central Florida USA Michael W. Dryden1*, Michael S. Canfield2, Kimberly Kalosy1, Amber Smith1, Lisa Crevoiserat1, Jennifer C. McGrady1, Kaitlin M. Foley1, Kathryn Green2, Chantelle Tebaldi2, Vicki Smith1, Tashina Bennett1, Kathleen Heaney3, Lisa Math3, Christine Royal3 and Fangshi Sun3 Abstract Background: A study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different oral flea and tick products to control flea infestations, reduce pruritus and minimize dermatologic lesions over a 12 week period on naturally infested dogs in west central FL USA. Methods: Thirty-four dogs with natural flea infestations living in 17 homes were treated once with a fluralaner chew on study day 0. Another 27 dogs living in 17 different homes were treated orally with an afoxolaner chewable on day 0, once between days 28–30 and once again between days 54–60. All products were administered according to label directions by study investigators. Flea populations on pets were assessed using visual area counts and premise flea infestations were assessed using intermittent-light flea traps on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and once between days 28–30, 40–45, 54–60 and 82–86. Dermatologic assessments were conducted on day 0 and once monthly. Pruritus assessments were conducted by owners throughout the study. No concurrent treatments for existing skin disease (antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, anti-fungals) were allowed.
  • Follow-Up Studies After Withdrawal of Deltamethrin Spraying Against Anopheles Culicifacies and Malaria Incidence

    Follow-Up Studies After Withdrawal of Deltamethrin Spraying Against Anopheles Culicifacies and Malaria Incidence

    Journal of the American Mosquito contror Association, 2o(4):424-42g,2004 Copyright @ 2OO4 by the American Mosquito Control Association, Inc. FOLLOW-UP STUDIES AFTER WITHDRAWAL OF DELTAMETHRIN SPRAYING AGAINST ANOPHELES CULICIFACIES AND MALARIA INCIDENCE MUSHARRAF ALI ANSARI eNo RAMA KRISHNA RAZDAN Malaria Research Centre (ICMR), 2}-Madhuban, Delhi_ll0 092, India ABSTRACT. Follow-up studies were carried out from 1989 to 1998 after withdrawal of deltamethrin indoor spraying to evaluate the-recovery rate of a population of Anopheles culicifacies resistant to dichlorodiphenyltri- chloroethane (DDT) and hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) in selected villages in Uttar pradesh State, I;dia. The study revealed 82.4-96.5Ea reduction in adult density of An. culicifacies and 72.7-967o reduction in malaria incidence in the area sprayed with deltamethrin at 20 mg/m, as compared to a control area sprayed with HCH, for 5 successive years even after withdrawal of deltamethrin spray. The impact was very clear when the annual falciparum incidence was compared with that of the control area. The vector population gradually started re- covering after 5 years. However, the slide falciparum rate remained below 4 even after 10 years of withdrawal of spraying. The study revealed that indoor residual spraying of deltamethrin would be cost-effective, at least in areas where malaria is transmitted by An. culicifacies, which is primarily a zoophilic species and associated with malaria epidemics. In view of this, a review of the insecticide policy and strategy of vector control is urgently needed because of the possible risks associated with the presence of nonbiodegradable insecticide in the environment, as well as to minimize the costs of operation and to enhance the useful life of insecticides.
  • New Brunswick Drug Plans Formulary

    New Brunswick Drug Plans Formulary

    New Brunswick Drug Plans Formulary August 2019 Administered by Medavie Blue Cross on Behalf of the Government of New Brunswick TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction.............................................................................................................................................I New Brunswick Drug Plans....................................................................................................................II Exclusions............................................................................................................................................IV Legend..................................................................................................................................................V Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification of Drugs A Alimentary Tract and Metabolism 1 B Blood and Blood Forming Organs 23 C Cardiovascular System 31 D Dermatologicals 81 G Genito Urinary System and Sex Hormones 89 H Systemic Hormonal Preparations excluding Sex Hormones 100 J Antiinfectives for Systemic Use 107 L Antineoplastic and Immunomodulating Agents 129 M Musculo-Skeletal System 147 N Nervous System 156 P Antiparasitic Products, Insecticides and Repellants 223 R Respiratory System 225 S Sensory Organs 234 V Various 240 Appendices I-A Abbreviations of Dosage forms.....................................................................A - 1 I-B Abbreviations of Routes................................................................................A - 4 I-C Abbreviations of Units...................................................................................A
  • STRUCTURAL PEST CONTROL APPLICATOR: GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Label Changes for Pyrethroid Non-Agricultural Outdoor Products

    STRUCTURAL PEST CONTROL APPLICATOR: GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Label Changes for Pyrethroid Non-Agricultural Outdoor Products

    Structural Pest Section 19 Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. Atlanta, Georgia 30334-4201 Phone: (404) 656-3641 STRUCTURAL PEST CONTROL APPLICATOR: GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Label Changes for Pyrethroid Non-agricultural Outdoor Products Why are these labels being changed? Recently, pesticide products containing insecticides in the chemical class known as pyrethroids have undergone a series of label changes. These changes are in response to water quality monitoring studies that found significant amounts of pyrethroid insecticides in sediments of urban creeks. Pyrethroids are highly toxic to aquatic organisms, accumulate in sediments and thus produce an increased risk of causing harm to invertebrates and other creatures living within sediments. What is currently happening? The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is requiring revised “Environmental Hazard Statements” and general “Directions for Use” for pyrethroid pesticide products used in non-agricultural outdoor settings. These label changes are intended to reduce pyrethroid movement into non-target areas through runoff or spray drift that may occur during applications. Pyrethroid products containing the new label language are now in the marketplace. Both consumer products and those designed for use by pest management professionals (PMPs) are affected by these changes. These new requirements will result in changing use patterns for the prevention and control of general household pests, lawn and ornamental pests as well as termites and other wood-destroying organisms. New language will be found on pyrethroid products formulated as liquid concentrates, broadcast granules, dusts and ready-to-use liquid mixtures. Older products that do not have new label restrictions can continue to be used according to the attached label. Broadcast applications to large surfaces such as exterior walls of buildings, patios, or concrete walkways will no longer be allowed.
  • 4. Chemical and Physical Information

    4. Chemical and Physical Information

    PYRETHRINS AND PYRETHROIDS 131 4. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION 4.1 CHEMICAL IDENTITY The naturally-occurring pyrethrins, extracted from chrysanthemum flowers, are esters of chrysanthemic acid (Pyrethrin I, Cinerin I, and Jasmolin I) and esters of pyrethric acid (Pyrethrin II, Cinerin II, and Jasmolin II). In the United States, the pyrethrum extract is standardized as 45–55% w/w total pyrethrins. The typical proportion of Pyrethrins I to II is 0.2:2.8, while the ratio of pyrethrins:cinerins:jasmolins is 71:21:7 (Tomlin 1997). Information regarding the chemical identity of the pyrethrins is presented in Table 4-1. Pyrethroids are synthetic esters derived from the naturally-occurring pyrethrins. One exception to the axiom that all pyrethroids are esters of carboxylic acids is noteworthy. There is a group of oxime ethers that exhibits insecticidal activity similar in nature to the pyrethrins and pyrethroid esters (Davies 1985). Little data exist regarding these compounds, and no commercial products have been produced. Commercially available pyrethroids include allethrin, bifenthrin, bioresmethrin, cyfluthrin, cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, esfenvalerate (fenvalerate), flucythrinate, flumethrin, fluvalinate, fenpropathrin, permethrin, phenothrin, resmethrin, tefluthrin, tetramethrin, and tralomethrin. Information regarding the chemical identity of pyrethroids is shown in Table 4-2. With the exception of deltamethrin, pyrethroids are a complex mixture of isomers rather than one single pure compound. For pyrethroids possessing the cyclopropane moiety, isomerism about the cyclopropane ring greatly influences the toxicity of these insecticides. The presence of two chiral centers in the ring results in two pairs of diastereomers. The diastereomers and their nonsuperimposable mirror images (enantiomers) are illustrated in Figure 4-1.
  • Guide No. 1 – October 2020 2/12 the CONCEPT and IMPLEMENTATION of CPA GUIDANCE RESIDUE LEVELS

    Guide No. 1 – October 2020 2/12 the CONCEPT and IMPLEMENTATION of CPA GUIDANCE RESIDUE LEVELS

    Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco CORESTA GUIDE N° 1 The Concept and Implementation of CPA Guidance Residue Levels October 2020 Agro-Chemical Advisory Committee CORESTA TECHNICAL GUIDE N° 1 Title: The Concept and Implementation of CPA Guidance Residue Levels Status: Valid Note: This document will be periodically reviewed by CORESTA Document history: Date of review Information July 2003 Version 1 GRL for Pyrethrins () and Terbufos corrected. December 2003 CPA terminology corrected. June 2008 Version 2 – GRLs revised and residue definitions added Provisional GRL of 2.00 ppm for Cyfluthrin to replace previous June 2010 GRL of 0.50 ppm July 2013 Version 3 – GRLs revised October 2013 Note for Maleic Hydrazide revised Version 4 – GRLs revised + clarification that scope of GRLs July 2016 applies predominantly to the production of traditional cigarette tobaccos and GAP associated with their cultivation. June 2018 Fluopyram GRL of 5 ppm added to GRL list Version 5 – Nine new CPAs with GRL added to list. November 2019 Revision of GRLs for Chlorantraniliprole and Indoxacarb. Updated web links. October 2020 Version 6 – Flupyradifurone GRL of 21 ppm added to GRL list. CORESTA Guide No. 1 – October 2020 2/12 THE CONCEPT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CPA GUIDANCE RESIDUE LEVELS Executive Summary • Guidance Residue Levels (GRLs) are in the remit of the Agro-Chemical Advisory Committee (ACAC) of CORESTA. Their development is a joint activity of all ACAC members, who represent the leaf production, processing and manufacturing sectors of the Tobacco Industry. The concept of GRLs and their implementation are described in this guide. • GRLs provide guidance to tobacco growers and assist with interpretation and evaluation of results from analyses of residues of Crop Protection Agents (CPAs*).
  • RR Program's RCL Spreadsheet Update

    RR Program's RCL Spreadsheet Update

    RR Program’s RCL Spreadsheet Update March 2017 RR Program RCL Spreadsheet Update DNR-RR-052e The Wisconsin DNR Remediation and Redevelopment Program (RR) has updated the numerical soil standards in the August 2015 DNR-RR- 052b RR spreadsheet of residual contaminant levels (RCLs). The RCLs were determined using the U.S. EPA RSL web- calculator by accepting EPA exposure defaults, with the exception of using Chicago, IL, for the climatic zone. This documentThe U.S. provides EPA updateda summary its Regionalof changes Screening to the direct-contact Level (RSL) RCLs website (DC-RCLs) in June that2015. are To now reflect in the that March 2017 spreadsheet.update, the The Wisconsin last page ofDNR this updated document the has numerical the EPA exposuresoil standards, parameter or residual values usedcontaminant in the RCL levels calculations. (RCLs), in the Remediation and Redevelopment program’s spreadsheet of RCLs. This document The providesU.S. EPA a RSL summary web-calculator of the updates has been incorporated recently updated in the Julyso that 2015 the spreadsheet.most up-to-date There toxicity were values no changes for chemi - cals madewere certainlyto the groundwater used in the RCLs,RCL calculations. but there are However, many changes it is important in the industrial to note that and the non-industrial web-calculator direct is only a subpartcontact of the (DC) full RCLsEPA RSL worksheets. webpage, Tables and that 1 andthe other 2 of thissubparts document that will summarize have important the DC-RCL explanatory changes text, generic tablesfrom and the references previous have spreadsheet yet to be (Januaryupdated.
  • Thrips on Seedling Cotton: Related Problems and Control E Burris

    Thrips on Seedling Cotton: Related Problems and Control E Burris

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports LSU AgCenter 1989 Thrips on seedling cotton: related problems and control E Burris Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/agexp Recommended Citation Burris, E, "Thrips on seedling cotton: related problems and control" (1989). LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports. 881. http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/agexp/881 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the LSU AgCenter at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. L. l NOV 011989 RA. Contents Page Introduction . 3 Materials and Methods . 6 General Experimental Design.. .. ... .... ........ .................... 6 Seed Treatments . 7 Soil Treatments . 7 Foliar Treatments . 7 Thrips Population Monitoring . 7 Measurements of Cotton Growth and Yield . 8 Results and Discussion ... .. ........ ... .... .. ..... ..... ... .............. .. 8 Potential [mpact of Thrips on Plant Height and Seed Cotton Yield . 9 Efficacy of Selected Insecticide . 9 Interactions of Insecticides U ed for Thrip Control with Other Pe ts and Pe ticide . 13 Summary and Conclusions ..... ..... ................... .. ....... ........ 16 Information on Chemicals U ed in Te t. .. .... .. ..................... 18 Literature Cited ........................... ... .. .. .. .... ........ .. ........ 19 The mention of a pesticide in thi publication i intended only as a report of research and does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station nor an endor ement over other product of a similar nature not mentioned. Some uses of pesticide di cus ed here have not nece arily been registered. All consumer uses of pe ticides must be registered by appropriate late and federal agencie .