ENERGY DEMOCRACY Germany’S ENERGIEWENDE to Renewables Energy Democracy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ENERGY DEMOCRACY Germany’S ENERGIEWENDE to Renewables Energy Democracy Craig Morris & Arne Jungjohann ENERGY DEMOCRACY Germany’s ENERGIEWENDE to Renewables Energy Democracy Craig Morris • Arne Jungjohann Energy Democracy Germany’s Energiewende to Renewables Craig Morris Arne Jungjohann Petite Planète, Freiburg and Berlin , Stuttgart , Germany Germany ISBN 978-3-319-31890-5 ISBN 978-3-319-31891-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-31891-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016945578 © Th e Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th e Author(s) 2016 Th is work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and trans- mission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Th e use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Th e publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Cover illustration: © VPC Travel Photo / Alamy Stock Photo Printed on acid-free paper Th is Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature Th e registered company is Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland For Phillip and Pascale Energy democracy , n. [ɛnərdʒi dɪmɑkrəsi] 1) when citizens and communities can make their own energy, even when it hurts energy corporations fi nancially; 2) something currently mainly pursued in Denmark and Germany but that can spread around the world during the current window of opportunity; 3) the most often overlooked benefi t of distributed renewables in the fi ght against climate change; 4) something to fi ght for as the path to better quality of life with stronger communities and better personal relationships. vii Preface Th is book is a history of Germany’s energy transition—its Energiewende. It is not the history of the Energiewende. A book of this length couldn’t be defi nitive or exhaustive. On the other hand, most international readers— and, no doubt, numerous Germans—who assume that the Energiewende started in 2011 after the nuclear accident in Fukushima are likely to be surprised to hear how old the grassroots movement is. Since both of us have spent at least the past decade communicating German energy and climate policymaking for the international commu- nity, we were struck by the awkward perception of the Energiewende after Fukushima. Following the nuclear phaseout in 2011, the Energiewende drew attention around the world for being allegedly exceptional with its move from nuclear power to wind and solar. Yet, Germany is not excep- tional for any of this. Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Italy, and Switzerland all have nuclear phaseout plans (some already completed), and France aims to reduce its reliance on nuclear. Th e rest of Europe either has no nuclear reactors or faces an unplanned phaseout as old plants reach the end of their lifetimes and country after country fails to build new reactors. Germany isn’t exceptional for wind or solar either. Italy and Greece have a higher share of solar power on their grids; China has more installed. Denmark, Portugal, Ireland, Spain, Romania, and Lithuania have a higher or similar share of wind power. And China and the US have more installed. ix x Preface Th e Energiewende is nonetheless exceptional in one way too often overlooked. Apart from Denmark and, more recently, Scotland, Germany is the only country in the world where the switch to renew- ables is a switch to energy democracy. We wanted to remedy that over- sight with this book. Morris is an American writer based in Germany; Jungjohann, a for- mer Washington-based policy expert fostering transatlantic cooperation on energy and climate matters. As contributing editor of Renewables International, Morris suddenly found himself thrust into the role of explaining the Energiewende in English in the wake of Fukushima, when few journalists working in English knew the full history. In 2012, we then joined forces to found the website EnergyTransition.de, fi rst with an e-book and later with a blog, to help fi ll the gap. We are both often asked why a transition to renewables largely in the hands of citizens has been possible in Germany but not, say, in the US and the UK (at least not up to now). With his years of experience in the Deutscher Bundestag, Jungjohann brought numerous insider stories and interview contacts to the table. Morris, in return, personally knew many of the people from Wyhl to Schönau—arguably, the region that gave birth to the Energiewende— because he had lived in the area since 1992. An American–German duo was also interesting given the topic and target audience. Perhaps ironi- cally, Jungjohann sometimes felt uncomfortable with Morris’s praise of Germany and criticism of the US, while Morris could not always agree with Jungjohann’s praise of the US or criticism of Germany. Each author probably expects more of his home country than is reasonable. Th e result is a more balanced book than either author would have writ- ten alone. Several of the chapters are based heavily on individual books, as our footnotes reveal. Readers may wonder why we did not use broader sources of information. Th ey certainly exist: Paul Gipe has produced impressive work on the history of wind power, even with a focus on Germany; John Perlin has covered the history of solar masterfully. Gabrielle Hecht has also written authoritatively on the history of nuclear in France, and we do not cite her in our comparison either. Preface xi Th e reason is that all these books are already available in English. In using books only available in German and French, we aimed to at least make the gist of this untranslated literature accessible to a wider audi- ence. It should be noted that the general fi ndings and conclusions in the literature largely overlap; Hecht and Topçu come to very much the same conclusions about nuclear France, as do Gipe, Oelker, and Lobe for wind or Perlin and Janzing for solar. Later chapters also rely heavily on the fantastic German news archive at Energie-Chronik.de run by German journalist Udo Leuschner. As we move closer to the future, Morris’s own online publications are referenced more frequently, as is our collaboration at EnergyTransition.de. Our intent is to show international readers how German citizens got their government behind a policy that the public wanted. As such, our story downplays numerous aspects important for the German energy sec- tor’s history, but not necessarily for the energy transition as a grassroots movement. One example is the transformation of the energy sector in the former East Germany after the Fall of the Wall, which this book does not deal with in depth. For the sake of brevity, this book does not tell the tale of every part of the grassroots movement worth mentioning either. For instance, Gorleben—the proposed site of (West) Germany’s nuclear waste reposi- tory—played a huge role in the anti-nuclear movement; it thus deserves its own subchapter, which we unfortunately did not have space for. Furthermore, in addition to the numerous people mentioned briefl y, there were also countless environmental and renewable energy campaigns and trade shows driven by citizens. Numerous state and local govern- ments also passed ambitious legislation and set up Energy Agencies, which have done excellent work in helping the public implement not only renewable energy technology, but also effi ciency. Not all these help- ful participants could be mentioned. Many people helped shape this book. Th e authors would like to thank those who provided wise counsel and encouraging feedback at diff er- ent stages of the project: energy analyst Toby Couture, journalist Osha Davidson, energy policy expert Jose Etcheverry, John Farrell of the ILSR, WWEA executive director Stefan Gsänger, Paul Gunther of Beyond xii Preface Nuclear, Bastian Hermisson of the Washington offi ce of the Heinrich Böll Stiftung, author Mark Hertsgaard, Gisa Holzhausen of the GIZ, Tetsunari Iida of ISEP, Andreas Kraemer of Ecologic Institute, journalist Bernward Janzing, Anna Leidreiter of the World Future Council, Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, Georg Maue of the German Embassy Washington DC, Daniel Lerch of the Post Carbon Institute, energy analyst Hugo Lukas, journalist Gregory McDonald, English lin- guist Paul McPherron, Phyllis McPherron, Michael Mehling of MIT, Jennifer Morgan of Greenpeace International, Diane Moss of the 100% Renewables Institute, Klaus Müschen of the German Environmental Agency (UBA), Christ Nelder of the Rocky Mountain Institute, energy analyst Uwe Nestle, Alan Nogee of the Union of Concerned Scientists, Alexander Ochs of the Worldwatch Institute, Sara Peach of University of North Carolina, Josef Pesch of EWS, energy analyst Raff aele Piria, Anya Schoolman of the Committee Power Network, Joachim Seel of UC Berkeley, Dave Toke of the University of Aberdeen, energy analyst Sezin Topçu, energy analyst Dieter Seifried, Dirk Vansintjan of REscoop, for- mer Lead Mission Operations Engineer at SpaceX Daniel Villani, and retired EU offi cial James Wimberley. Arne’s special thanks go to Verena for covering his back in an exciting and demanding time with a young family.
Recommended publications
  • Statusbericht Zur Kernenergienutzung in Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2019
    Statusbericht zur Kernenergienutzung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2019 Abteilung Nukleare Sicherheit und atomrechtliche Aufsicht in der Entsorgung Ines Bredberg Johann Hutter Andreas Koch Kerstin Kühn Katarzyna Niedzwiedz Klaus Hebig-Schubert Rolf Wähning BASE-KE-01/20 Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgende URN: urn:nbn:de:0221-2020092123025 Zur Beachtung: Die BASE-Berichte und BASE-Schriften können von den Internetseiten des Bundesamtes für die Sicherheit der nuklearen Entsorgung unter http://www.base.bund.de kostenlos als Volltexte heruntergeladen werden. Salzgitter, September 2020 Statusbericht zur Kernenergie- nutzung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2019 BASE Abteilung Nukleare Sicherheit und atomrechtliche Aufsicht in der Entsorgung Ines Bredberg Johann Hutter Andreas Koch Kerstin Kühn Katarzyna Niedzwiedz Klaus Hebig-Schubert Rolf Wähning Inhalt ABKÜRZUNGSVERZEICHNIS ......................................................................................................................... 6 1 ELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEERZEUGUNG IN DEUTSCHLAND .............................. 11 1.1 ALLGEMEINES .................................................................................................................................. 11 1.2 DAS ERNEUERBARE-ENERGIEN-GESETZ .................................................................................... 12 1.3 AUSSTIEG AUS DER STROMERZEUGUNG DURCH KERNENERGIE ......................................... 12 1.3.1 Stand der Atomgesetzgebung in Deutschland ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geschäftsbericht 2020 – Mit Einzelabschluss
    EWS Elektrizitätswerke Schönau eG Geschäfts bericht 2020 Inhalt 02 Kennzahlen auf einen Blick 04 Vorwort des Vorstands 06 Bericht des Aufsichtsrats 08 Rückblick 2020 10 Ein Jahr EWS 15 General versammlung 2020 16 Förderprogramm 2020 22 Neubau im Stand-by-Modus 26 «Lasst uns die Dächer vollpacken!» 32 Gelebte Basisdemokratie 38 Lagebericht und Jahresabschluss 2020 40 Lagebericht 40 Grundlagen des Unternehmens 45 Wirtschaftsbericht 91 Prognose-, Chancen- und Risikobericht 95 Internes Kontroll- und Risikomanagementsystem 96 Jahresabschluss 2020 96 Bilanz 98 Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung 100 Anhang 110 Bestätigungsvermerk des unabhängigen Abschlussprüfers 115 Ergebnisverwendungs vorschlag Kennzahlen auf einen Blick Unternehmen und Investitionen 2020 2019 Ertragslage EWS eG Umsatz T€ 7.458 6.118 Jahresergebnis T€ 10.750 4.262 Finanzlage EWS eG Jahres-Cashflow T€ 2.187 5.529 Cashflow aus laufender Geschäftstätigkeit T€ −2.597 903 Cashflow aus Investitionstätigkeit T€ −2.026 −7.461 Cashflow aus Finanzierungstätigkeit T€ −705 3.351 Vermögenslage EWS eG Bilanzsumme T€ 79.071 68.822 Geschäftsguthaben der verbleibenden Mitglieder T€ 40.941 40.500 Eigenkapital T€ 70.437 60.183 Eigenkapitalquote 89 % 87 % Mitglieder und Mitarbeiter EWS-Gruppe Genossenschaftsmitglieder zum 31.12. Anzahl 9.052 8.245 Mitarbeiter EWS eG zum 31.12. Anzahl 72 59 Mitarbeiter EWS-Gruppe zum 31.12. Anzahl 198 166 Investitionen EWS-Gruppe Brutto-Investitionen immaterielle Vermögenswerte und Sachanlagen T€ 10.600* 10.308 Förderprogramm «Sonnencent» Fördersumme T€ 1.640 1.775 *Vorläufig, da Konzernzahlen noch nicht final vorliegen. 02 Geschäftsbericht 2020 der EWS Elektrizitätswerke Schönau eG Energie und Netze 2020 2019 Energiebelieferung EWS-Gruppe Stromabsatz Endkunden GWh 827 835 davon an Weiterverteiler GWh 217 226 CO2-Vermeidung (352 g/kWh) Tonnen 291.104 363.225 Gasabsatz Endkunden GWh 492 467 davon an Weiterverteiler GWh 144 135 Wärmeabsatz an Endkunden MWh 12.089 11.087 Stromkunden zum 31.12.
    [Show full text]
  • Baumschäden/Umgestürzte Bäume Liebe Grundstücksbesitzer, Durch Den Starken Schneefall Wurden Einige Bäume in Mitleiden- Schaft Gezogen Und Sind Umgestürzt
    DO, 21. JANUAR 2021 NR. 03 Schienenersatzverkehr für die Strecke zwischen Gottenheim – Riegel Ort – Endingen für den Zugver- kehr im Zeitraum vom 22. Februar - 27. März 2021. Mehr Infos und den Busplan f nden Sie auf Seite 4 Anmeldung für die Impfung im Kreisimpfzentrum in Kenzingen Wie das funktioniert lesen Sie auf Seite 3 Baumschäden/umgestürzte Bäume Liebe Grundstücksbesitzer, durch den starken Schneefall wurden einige Bäume in Mitleiden- schaft gezogen und sind umgestürzt. Wir bitten die Grundstücksei- gentümer das private Grundstück auf mögliche Baumschäden zu prüfen und die umgestürzten Bäume ordnungsgerecht zu entfer- nen, sodass keine Gefahr vom Grundstück für Dritte ausgeht. Insbesondere in den Bereichen Dürleberg, Gallberg und Kreuzgas- Ein haushoher se sind Bäume umgestürzt, die es zu beseitigen gilt. Schneemann in der Breite I Ihre Gemeindeverwaltung Seite 2 Donnerstag, den 21. Januar 2021 Riegel WICHTIGE RUFNUMMERN | NOTDIENSTE Rathaus Riegel am Kaiserstuhl Rufnummer für den ärztlichen Notfalldienst (allgemein,- Zentrale Tel. 90 44-0 Fax 90 44-26 kinder-, augen- und HNO-ärztlicher Notfalldienst): 116117 (Anruf ist kostenlos) [email protected] Öfnungszeiten und Anschrift der Notfallpraxis: Sprechstunden: Freiburg (allgemeiner Notfalldienst) Allgemeine Notfall- Mo, Di, Fr 08.00 - 12.00 Uhr praxis Freiburg: Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Sir-Hans-A.- Do 08.00 - 12.00 Uhr und 14.00 - 18.00 Uhr Krebs-Straße, 79106 Freiburg Mittwoch geschlossen Mo, Di, Do 20 – 24 Uhr, Mi und Fr 16 - 24 Uhr Sa, So und an Feiertagen 8 – 24 Uhr Bauhof 0171 5586233 Kindergarten Am Dörle 88 07 Strom, Netze BW GmbH Störungsnummer 0800 3629477 Kindergarten Sonnenschein 4 52 21 Gas 0800 2767767 Michaelschule Grundschule 90 73 60 Wasser, Stadtwerke Emmendingen 07641 9599373 Schülerhort Abenteuerland Ambulanter Krankenpfegedienst - Pfegen Daheim in Räumen der Michaelschule 688-612 Susanne Hetzel, Riegel 930003 oder 930009 NOTRUF Kath.
    [Show full text]
  • Klimaschutzkonzept Bahlingen Einzubringen Und Damit Dessen Inhalte Aktiv Mitzugestalten
    2013 INTEGRIERTES KLIMASCHUTZKONZEPT NÖRDLICHER KAISERSTUHL Band 2-Gemeinde Bahlingen endura kommunal GmbH 02.09.2013 INTEGRIERTES KLIMASCHUTZKONZEPT NÖRDLICHER KAISERSTUHL Im Auftrag der Stadt Endingen in Kooperation mit der Gemeinde Bahlingen und der Gemeinde Forch- heim Erstellt durch endura kommunal GmbH Emmy-Noether-Str. 2 79110 Freiburg [email protected] www.endura-kommunal.de Autoren Sabine Barden Frank Lempert Matthias Rausch Wiebke Gerhardt COPYRIGHT Die in der Studie enthaltenen Informationen, Konzepte und Inhalte unterliegen den gel- tenden Urhebergesetzen. Die Nutzung sowie die Weitergabe an Dritte sind nur mit na- mentlicher Nennung von endura kommunal als Urheberin gestattet. I INTEGRIERTES KLIMASCHUTZKONZEPT NÖRDLICHER KAISERSTUHL Die Erstellung dieses Klimaschutzkonzeptes wurde gefördert durch die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Das integrierte Klimaschutzkonzept Nördlicher Kaiserstuhl wurde in der Zeit vom 01.10.2012 bis zum 30.09.2013 mit Fördermitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit im Rahmen der nationalen Klimaschutzini- tiative unter dem Förderkennzeichen 03KS3863 gefördert. Fördermittelgeber Bundesministerium für Projektträger Jülich Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit Freiburg, den 10. September 2013 II INTEGRIERTES KLIMASCHUTZKONZEPT NÖRDLICHER KAISTERST UHL Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 EINFÜHRUNG .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Inhalte eines Klimaschutzkonzeptes ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gemeinde Wyhl Am Kaiserstuhl TERMINE & VERANSTALTUNGEN
    Fr, 16. Juli 2021 • Nr. 28 Gemeinde Wyhl am Kaiserstuhl TERMINE & VERANSTALTUNGEN Donnerstag, 22.07.2021 Abfuhr graue Tonne DIE GEMEINDE INFORMIERT Öff entliche Gemeinderatssitzung Öff entliche Gemeinderatssitzung Am Donnerstag, 22.07.2021, 19:00 Uhr, fi ndet in der Turn- und Festhalle eine öff entliche Sitzung des Gemeinderates statt. Hierzu ist die Einwohnerschaft herzlich eingeladen. Tagesordnung 1. Bekanntgabe von Beschlüssen aus der nichtöff entlichen Sitzung vom 24.06.2021 2. Sicherheitsgespräch Polizeiposten Endingen und Information über die polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2020 der Gemeinde Wyhl 3. Bebauungsplan “Am Pfarrgarten II“; Aufstellungsbeschluss als Bebauungsplan der Innenentwicklung im beschleunigten Verfahren nach § 13 a Baugesetzbuch 4. Wärmeversorgung der Liegenschaften Schulzentrum, Turn-/Festhalle und Sporthalle; Beschlussfassung 5. Aktivierung und Erneuerung des Anwesens Adlergasse 23 im Rahmen der Sanierung “Ortskern II“; Beschlussfassung über die Förderhöhe Sommerpause 2021 6. Änderung der Gebührenordnung zur Schul- und Ferienbetreuungssatzung Auch das Mitteilungsblatt macht 7. Haushaltsentwicklung 2021; Information des Gemeinderates mal Pause! 8. Bilanzierungsrichtlinien der Gemeinde Wyhl am Kaiserstuhl 9. Änderung des kalkulatorischen Zinssatzes In der Zeit vom 06.08.2021 bis 10. Budgetierungsregelungen bei der Gemeinde Wyhl am Kaiserstuhl 20.08.2021 (31, 32 und 33 KW) 11. Inventurrichtline der Gemeinde Wyhl am Kaiserstuhl erscheint kein Mitteilungsblatt. 12. Ersatzbeschaff ung IPads für die Ratsarbeit 13. Beschaff ung von zwei Laptops mit Dockingstation Das letzte Mitteilungsblatt vor den 14. Annahme einer Spende gemäß § 78 Abs. 4 GemO Ferien kommt am Freitag, 30.07.2021 15. Bauanträge in der KW 30. 15.1 Antrag zum Anbau eines Treppenhauses und Verlängerung einer Gaube am beste- henden Wohnhaus auf dem Grundstück Flst. Nr. 7353/1, Stockackerstraße 13 Die erste Ausgabe nach der 15.2 Antrag zum Neubau eines Wohnhauses mit drei Wohnungen auf dem Grundstü- Sommerpause wird am cken Flst.
    [Show full text]
  • Stundentakt Zwischen Breisach Und Riegel Ab Dezember 2009;
    Pressemitteilung Stundentakt zwischen Breisach und Riegel ab 13. Dezember 2009; Mehrverkehre zwischen Sasbach und Riegel Die westliche und nördliche Kaiserstuhlbahn erhält nun mit Zügen und Schnellbussen einen durchgängigen Stundentakt zwischen Breisach und Riegel DB. Taktverdichtungen zwischen Breisach und Jechtingen sowie Riegel und Sasbach mit Bussen. Die tangierten Buslinien werden angepasst. Damit profitieren auch die Gemeinden am Kaiserstuhl ohne Bahnanschluss. Vertaktung der Linie 105 zwischen Emmendingen und Bahlingen. Daraus entsteht mit dem Citybus 8 ein Halbstundentakt zwischen Emmendingen, Teningen und Nimburg. Der stellvertretende Verbandsvorsitzende des Zweckverband Regio-Nahverkehr Freiburg (ZRF) und Landrat Hanno Hurth: „Mit dem neuen Fahrplankonzept wird das Breisgau-S-Bahn-Konzept konsequent weiterentwickelt. Die Verbindungen zwischen dem nördlichen und östlichen Kaiserstuhl nach Emmendingen werden, wie seit langem gefordert, erheblich verbessert.“ Zum Fahrplanwechsel am 13. Dezember erfährt die Kaiserstuhlbahn einen weiteren Qualitätssprung. Auf der nördlichen Kaiserstuhlbahn, zwischen Jechtingen und Riegel, wird montags bis freitags ein dichterer Taktfahrplan eingeführt, so dass zwischen Breisach – Endingen – Riegel ein rundes Angebot entsteht. Dazu wird auch der Busverkehr im nördlichen und östlichen Bereich des Kaiserstuhls an die neuen Zugtakte angepasst. Der Zweckverband Regio-Nahverkehr Freiburg (ZRF), der Landkreis Emmendingen und die SWEG Südwestdeutsche Verkehrs-Aktiengesellschaft haben diese Verbesserungen
    [Show full text]
  • The German Energiewende – History and Status Quo
    1 The German Energiewende – History and Status Quo Jürgen‐Friedrich Hake,1) Wolfgang Fischer,1) Sandra Venghaus,1) Christoph Weckenbrock1) 1) Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Energy and Climate Research ‐ Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK‐STE), D‐52425 Jülich, Germany Executive Summary Industrialized nations rely heavily on fossil fuels as an economic factor. Energy systems therefore play a special part in realizing visions of future sustainable societies. In Germany, successive governments have specified their ideas on sustainable development and the related energy system. Detailed objectives make the vision of the Energiewende – the transformation of the energy sector – more concrete. Many Germans hope that the country sets a positive example for other nations whose energy systems also heavily rely on fossil fuels. A glance at the historical dimensions of this transformation shows that the origins of German energy objectives lie more than thirty years in the past. The realization of these goals has not been free from tensions and conflicts. This article aims at explaining Germany’s pioneering role in the promotion of an energy system largely built on renewable energy sources by disclosing the drivers that have successively led to the Energiewende. To reveal these drivers, the historical emergence of energy politics in Germany was analyzed especially with respect to path dependencies and discourses (and their underlying power relations) as well as exogenous events that have enabled significant shifts in the political energy strategy of Germany. Keywords Energy transition, energy policy, energy security, nuclear power, renewables, Germany Contribution to Energy, 2nd revision 4/14/2015 2 I Introduction In light of the global challenges of climate change, increasing greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, the depletion of natural resources and political instabilities, the transition of national energy systems has become a major challenge facing energy policy making in many countries [e.g., Shen et al., 2011, Al‐Mansour, 2011].
    [Show full text]
  • Disposal of Spent Fuel from German Nuclear Power Plants - Paper Work Or Technology?
    DISPOSAL OF SPENT FUEL FROM GERMAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS - PAPER WORK OR TECHNOLOGY? R. GRAF GNS mbH Hollestrafie 7A, 45127 Essen - Germany W. FILBERT D5E 7ECHNOZOGT GmbH Eschenstrafie 55, 31224 Peine - Germany ABSTRACT The reference concept “direct disposal of spent fuel” was developed as an alternative to spent fuel reprocessing and vitrified HLW disposal. The technical facilities necessary for the implementation of this reference concept - the so called POLLUX-concept, e.g. interim storages for casks containing spent fuel, a pilot conditioning facility, and a special cask “POLLUX” for final disposal have been built. With view to a geological salt formation all handling procedures for the repository were tested aboveground in a test facility at a 1:1 scale. To optimise the concept all operational steps are reviewed for possible improvement. Most promising are a concept using canisters (BSK 3) instead of POLLUX casks, and the direct disposal of transport and storage casks (DIREGT-concept) which is the most recent one and has been designed for the direct disposal of large transport and storage casks. The final exploration of the pre-selected repository site is still pending, from the industries point of view due to political reasons only. The present paper describes the main concepts and their status as of today. 1. Introduction Since the late seventies the German industry has been developing an alternative to spent fuel reprocessing and vitrified HLW disposal. It is called "direct disposal of spent fuel". The feasibility was examined and safety aspects were evaluated. The Federal Government concluded that the technology of direct disposal had to be developed.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Government's Environmental Report 2019
    Draft: The German government’s Environmental Report 2019 (Environmental Status Report pursuant to Section 11 of the Environmental Information Act) Environment and nature – the basis of social cohesion 1 von 301 | www.bmu.de Table of contents Table of contents ...................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction: The integrity of nature and the environment as a basis for freedom, democracy and social cohesion .................................................................................................................. 5 A. Protecting the natural resources that sustain life ............................................................ 21 A.1 Water ....................................................................................................................... 21 A.1.1 Management of inland and coastal waters ....................................................... 21 A.1.2 Living by water – flood control .......................................................................... 29 A.1.3 Fracking ............................................................................................................ 31 A.1.4 Marine conservation and fisheries .................................................................... 32 A.1.5 International cooperation and global water protection policy ............................ 37 A.2 Soil ........................................................................................................................... 41 A.2.1
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy Transition Chronicles
    The Energy Transition Chronicles Energy Cities – The Energy Transition Chronicles The Energy Transition Chronicles Energy Cities provides local authorities with support for implementing their own energy transition process. The Proposals for the energy transition of cities and towns (www.energy-cities.eu/30proposals) are illustrated with around a hundred of inspirational examples from all over Europe. In this document composed of five case reports, Energy Cities goes further and tells the tale of energy transition success stories. Because it is important to show that energy transition is “possible”. Why, how, with whom, for what results? We interviewed local players and decision-makers to find out more. Here are their stories… Document prepared by Energy Cities with the support of the Franche-Comté Regional Council and of ADEME (French Environment and Energy Management Agency) Floriane Cappelletti, Jean-Pierre Vallar, Julia Wyssling Publication: January 2016 2 Energy Cities – The Energy Transition Chronicles CONTENTS THE “ENERGY REBELS” OF SCHÖNAU (GERMANY) OR HOW A COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE BECAME A GREEN ELECTRICITY PROVIDER ................................................................................................................................................... 5 VÄXJÖ (SWEDEN), A “BIO-ECONOMY” FOR ALL ............................................................................................... 23 BRUSSELS-CAPITAL (BELGIUM), AN URBAN LABORATORY OF ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS .................................... 43 BURGENLAND (AUSTRIA):
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Nuclear Movement in Germany
    The Anti-Nuclear Movement in Germany Joachim Radkau translated by Lucas Perkins from a lecture delivered at the Université Paris 7—Denis Diderot on February 25, 2009 When I began researching the history of nuclear technol- ogy 35 years ago, it never occurred to me to give a lecture on today’s subject. At that time there was strong resistance, rooted in a broad swath of the French (or more precisely, Alsatian) population to nuclear energy projects, more read- ily recognizable than in Germany. This is important to re- member. Beyond that, I was also at that time an enthusiastic supporter of nuclear energy, and my original goal was to use the example of nuclear technology to expose the sluggish- ness of West Germany’s government, which wasn’t promot- ing the technology of the future energetically enough. As I gathered more and more information on the risks of nucle- ar technology soon thereafter, I came upon today’s subject. Then it all seemed so simple: nuclear technology is very risky, and thus it’s no wonder that heavy resistance was mounted against it. This doesn’t really require much explanation. What does need to be explained, on the contrary, is why re- sistance is weaker in other countries than it is in Germany. In the 70s and 80s, sociologists tended to subsume the anti- nuclear movement under the “new social movements” cate- gory—a concept then imported from the U.S.—and to throw it on the same pile with the new women’s movement, the new peace movement, and movements seeking the equality and inclusion of marginalized groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Nuclear Crisis, NATO's Double-Track Decision
    Introduction Th e Nuclear Crisis, NATO’s Double-Track Decision, and the Peace Movement of the 1980s Christoph Becker-Schaum, Philipp Gassert, Martin Klimke, Wilfried Mausbach, and Marianne Zepp In the fall of 1983 more than a million people all across West Germany gathered under the motto “No to Nuclear Armament” to protest the imple- mentation of NATO’s Double-Track Decision of 12 December 1979 and the resulting deployment of Pershing II and cruise missiles in West Germany and other European countries.1 Th e media overfl owed with photos of human chains, sit-in blockades, and enormous protest rallies. Th e impressive range of protest events included street theater performances, protest marches, and blockades of missile depots. During the fi nal days of the campaign there were huge mass protests with several hundred thousand participants, such as the “Fall Action Week 1983” in Bonn on 22 October and a human chain stretching about 108 km from Ulm to Stuttgart. It seemed as if “peace” was the dominant theme all over Germany.2 Despite these protests, the West German Bundestag approved the missile deployment with the votes of the governing conservative coalition, thereby concluding one of the longest debates in German parliamentary history.3 A few days later the fi rst of the so-called Euromissiles were installed in Mut- langen, near Stuttgart, and in Sigonella, on the island of Sicily.4 Th e peace movement had failed to attain its short-term political aim. However, after a brief period of refl ection, the movement continued to mobilize masses of people for its political peace agenda.
    [Show full text]