Rse and Ideology in Social and Linguistic Practice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rse and Ideology in Social and Linguistic Practice BQA&Q8(9P9I@9XB2 _#B& QBFS'P “: QB# 8JQFQ6 BB@^DOLW3@ QB26T@T4 La6A_3A@L&:.S9P4S)SIP FP17`)TFS'QFP” Cambodian Views of Thailand: Identifying Discourse and Ideology in Social and Linguistic Practice Dr. Peter Vail (National University of Singapore) Assoc. Prof. Sommai Chinnak (Ubon Ratchathani University) 2553 IP,,T RDG5210049 BQA&Q8(9P9I@9XB2 _#B& QBFS'P “: QB# 8JQFQ6 BB@^DOLW3@ QB26T@T4 La6A_3A@L&:.S9P4S)SIP FP17`)TFS'QFP” #2O;FX S'P 1. Dr. Peter Vail National University of Singapore 2. Assoc. Prof. Sommai Chinnak Ubon Ratchathani University )W3_#B& QBF'S PA “W3_#B& QB)QA^38a6A^DO]=VL (LT4L )” IQ8P &Q8 L&6W8I8P9I8W8 QBFS'P 1 I8P9I8W Q8P6W8I8P9I8W8 QBFS'P (.) (]J$`T]:!X FS'P . a ']:4 ]J$83]a:) #2O;X F'S P 1. Dr. Peter Vail LQ'QBA University Scholars Programme, National University of Singapore 2. Assoc. Prof. Sommai Chinnak LQ'QBA S)QIP&#@GQI4B SD:GQI4B @JQFS6AQDPALW9DBQ)7Q8T ;X ) FAF'S P 1. Suthee Sathrakhom 2. Arpaporn Boontawee 3. Nittaya Saenbut 4. Yoothasart Ngamin 96#P3A IP,,Q]D!6T RDG5210049 PI: Peter Vail, National University of Singapore Project Coordinator: Sommai Chinnak, Ubon Ratchathani University BOAO]FDQ3Q]8S: 15 S@ 2009 - 13 @H 2010 S'P^ : 5 I = @P` ?; ^:8 QBIBW: 3Q]8S8&Q8_#B& QBFS'PA6P@*U:?Ha F86T:8966T 1 a ?S:5U& QB3Q]8S8&Q8FS'PA, :@, FS7T^=V86]T >9! @X ^QJBP 3 W36 QA6T]JDVL8P8'O]!T`PH2(=*U:8 DPH2 @S'PA6T@5a:4T=S@=a A6T^4 4P^4 966T 2-4 P a:=V4T=S@= P9FQBIQBBO3P ^` ?;P :a: ?=: T 2 “:,JQ P T@ ^4 a@ ` P a: @W@@`8) P&)Q4S8S@ (Post-National) P@=X)Q6T@T4 =VL89 `4V” @W :>@`a:T@T:.` ]J>` xenonym (Q ]BT:G) QF "T@” V "Siem" (?H@QJBP9#QF '@' V 'Siam') ^cTa ^` ]J>5@U W@@P@=X)Q6T@T4 :Ga a "T@" a @:8#Q6T@T@@`S& *U` ]BT^QF "a" T` ]BT=VL)T`]J >5&L3U T4:Ga`W2P B8S@ LV ^= 24*Ua IB @T` ^ 2P^@ ^ALA Q&LA Q& ^=JDQA6 T5VLF :8FP17@@ /P T5VLF ` #QF "T@" `@@S&D98P >#VL'Q ]BVL&BQF6T`V@, S5T:.S9P4S3 Q8FS)Q)T=`W @a8Q]6TAF6TLAX `4S2P- 7@, ^T8P ]!TA8#8LcV aT GUH@W@@@6T@4T a ^4 @Ta ^` ]J>8 F `44V:GP@=X*U:=V86T6:T ` @T@P@=P76T)P3]'8 :GP a :a ^V` #QF "T@" P8 >a ^` ]J>5@U W@@`8) post-national 6T@T 4 :Ga P8 #> V QF "T@" `:''W9Pa@ a 8@: 8#@V7@ (synonym) T` ]BT^ #QF "a" ^4 JQ 8@` ]BTA DW @T^44 Q& Pa:`P@a@ QF "IT@" P8 8@` ]BTA IP@aT:8 DW @WBPH8@`S F8 DQ&!L& B=NW T])V@P=/P :7S:4 *U@TJPFJ8 =V ?SIS7S T, W @=P7@S4:=V:7S:a4VL DW @ `c >4@T D QFL 5U&IS7S'Q L3T4`=V83S8JBVL6W83Q8F P17@^@ QF "a" `:''W9P` ]BTA #865T VLI4P SaPa: a)QFT P@=X@T@P@=P76T:8BX:7@ ^T@T @X IU=P9I8W8 DW @ "V^" @V`4P PHS2 S8FP4^ ^W @ aTa@ D QJDP&LAX P9L3T4@:2P B8S@^4 @TJPF QFJ8 ^` @Q#P, P@P@=P73 Q8 GH/S'6T@TGP?=`/T:=V/Q#P` @P@=P7 T 3 “P7S:GSDQ#DP4S8S@: W86Q&FP17@T5X AV^=@^a- P@=X" @W & :>@`a:T@S4S])S@4 c@P^ &]BV4^T QDP&] S3!U8] TAF P: :TAOFSMT, 4@V, ^ Takrabey @S88Ta^` ]J>4W2(=4 c 4P3IS8#3T GW4S7@ :G (G) `: .G. 1962 ^^` ]J>8F Q#4P3ISGT3X #DW@VL8Pa ` ] S?@PG6T] TAF P9! L!P^ &6T QDP&] S3!U8LAX 8TLA a `T]BQ'O a ]J>8F 4QJ8S^ QFJQF Q! L!P^ &6T] S3!U88P8I` ] S@VL3U:Ga, T :Ga@T:P@=P76T^ ^4 'BSc ^ =S2 L D QFJQ3P& D ^ F'O]J>8F :8 QB a@ A4W S7@==S2` 9BS:P4SG4 ^Pa ^` ]J>8F QDP7S4S8S@ P@=X@T@ a4 :>86T] TAF P@P& LBLA a ` ]J>8F @` F&8T6T] TAF P9 ::TAOFSMTAB8P^44 Q&LA Q&IS8])S& P@T] TAF! L& P9#4P3ISG a ^ ^` ]J>8F QIS&8Ta ;` ]J>@ Q!L&6PG4S!L&)QF P@=X)QLA a T `TAP& a ?S:5U@V?`:GPa@ F ::GaV:GP@=Xa :4W` @ !P^ :!W U8LT #BPa LA a ^a? S:5U;:W!U@P^ &#BP`@ 8TF Q I ;4 4S2=V86T=@^ a VL'Q 8P@TAPa ^^ a:*U& :=T^TAF6T8 :a:a 8P8 >#V P&<a^P@=X@P9F @VL&8P@5U&6Q& 4P^ ^S7T6T'O QF! @; ?P& D !U86O]9TA8B @::TAOFSMT:@ _D 8P5VLF :`^^ a:,JQ3P& D ^4 _L QI8T >a5X 6a:^ F]8VL&'Q BP/aP`QA!FQ'P T 4 "VL! QA! @=@^: TFS4`^^:T :,JQBOJF =@^a-P@=X” @Ta GUHPH2T`TFS4:QFP84@4=V86T^a- P@=X)Q!L&6P 2 :^ =V:@S8F @T]#BVL! QA! @=@^ Q8` Q&6T;X #8APa LAX ^:4 @Q >#V@TFQ6 @T] S3!U`P96 583S ` Q&6T^` ]J>8]#BVL! QA! @=@^a LA Q&)P @TAPa =S2 @` 5S888!P P^ P9I8W VLD @ -@S&)Q4S8S@V@^ JDP 6T]J>a 'Q IV@VL) L&6Q&LcV a LA a @XD6Q&3@ WHS6AQ6T8@` `@ 8Ta @GUH4T4P&LAX `4=V86T^, ^4 &&Q8! @4S, @P@=P7!L& DW @ 4@=V86T^, S@;S-@ ((=P4Pa@ ), @P@=P73 G FP17@^^4 Q&3 S88T8;W: S7TFS^P@P`@ 6T QDP:86T8S@` :''W9Pa@ @5T7S:.2^S@`89BS2^a 3T8P W#JDP@P`@a 7S9QA :.2 QB]#DVL8A ^ W ^P17@ @=@^`?= ^4 F Q QB9P&#P9#F9#W@ ^B Q&!L&B/P P96` S@S2^:.T S9P4SLAX ::Q)O&P &P@ Q6T'O:4PFJD L ]DT@P@=P7! @=@^ @ `S5T:.S9P4S! @=@^`/T:8B L&BLA!L&FS5T :.S9P4S`VL8A ^@P@=P7`X:^S@ *U&D F8 QDa:`/P T:@^>&6VL!L& =@^^/P > DP:?TB9 F8FS5)T TFS4;X @U8]BVc Abstract Project Code: RDG5210049 PI: Peter Vail, National University of Singapore Project Coordinator: Sommai Chinnak, Ubon Ratchathani University Project period: Aug 15 2009 - April 13 2010 Ch. 1. Introduction Introduction discusses the proposed aims, methods, and field sites. Ch. 2. “Trouble with Siem but not with Thai: Cambodian’s Post-National Views of their Northern Neighbor” This chapter focuses on an emerging discourse centered on the xenonym ‘Siem’ (Khmer for ‘Siam’), and how it encapsulates Cambodian views towards Thailand. ‘Siem’ has become a pejorative substitute for the word ‘Thai’, used to index Thailand’s imperial past, its expansion at the expense of the Khmer empire, and its wholesale appropriation of many facets of Khmer culture. Evidence for pejorative use of Siem is based on mass media accounts, on professional practices among tour guides at the Angkor complex, and on the work of other authors who have examined Khmer views of Thailand. But this article further argues that in northern Cambodia, where the population has tangible ties to Thailand and Thai people, that the choice of Siem or Thai now denotes a post-national view of Thailand. That is, Siem is not simply a pejorative synonym for Thai, but rather denotes different segments of Thai society altogether. Siem refers specifically to Bangkok-centered conservative Thai society, associated with the Abhisit-led Democratic government, the PAD, and any groups who make historically-based claims to Khmer lands or cultural capital. Thai now refers to ‘ordinary’ Thai citizens, i.e. those with which Cambodians share concrete ties, with a special affinity for ‘red-shirts’, the populism of Thaksin Shinwatra and his populist policies, and segments of the Thai population that are not ‘backward’ looking to an imperial past but forward-looking, with an emphasis on potential economic ties as the basis for relations. Evidence for this distinction between Siem and Thai is drawn from interviews, social practices, and material artifacts encountered during fieldwork. Ch. 3. “Stone Temple Jingoism: Contested Cultural Capital on the Thai- Cambodian Border” This chapter focuses on discursive dimensions of the ongoing border disputes over Preah Vihear, Tamoen, and Takrabey temples. It reviews certain facets of the 1962 ICJ decision and how the Court’s peculiar decision set the ideological stage for the ongoing dispute. It argues that the blame for the dispute falls most often on Thai intractability, that Thailand conducts very poor public relations in this regard, and that such an assessment of blame is ultimately unfair given the historical context. It shows how Cambodian nationalism is hypersensitive to issues concerning Angkorian heritage, how the discourses currently in circulation about the temple are starkly different from those relevant to the ICJ decision, and how this exposes a certain hypocrisy in Cambodian views. It discusses how domestic politics in both Cambodia and Thailand have caused the dispute to reignite, and what the effects of this flare-up are on the ground at the border. It further argues that the only likely resolution will require both Thailand and Cambodia to accept the political deadlock and find ways to work across it. Dual-listing of the Preah Vihear temple as a World Heritage Site offered such an opportunity, but this opportunity was squandered because the Thai government too easily panders to its far-right factions. Ch. 4. “Cross-border Connections: Life at the Troubled Thai-Cambodian Frontier” This article examines various aspects of everyday life along the Thai-Cambodia border, from both sides, to assess, firstly, what tangible cross-border connections people maintain, and secondly, what locally-constituted discourses inform these cross-border connections. The article further looks at how local discourses intersect, support, and/or subvert nationalist and other mainstream discourses that are afforded greater circulation in mass media and other channels. The ethnographic data informing this article derives from an examination of border markets, cross- border marriages, informal relations among military factions along the border, illicit activities (especially logging), religious/cultural connections and migrant labor.
Recommended publications
  • Management Plan to Appreciate and Understand Nakhon Ratchasima
    Management Plan to Appreciate and Understand Thailand's Heritage Case study: Prasat Phimai, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand ABM, Prof. Nartnide Maneeneb F;~culfyut' Munapmcni St.i~cx.Khan Kacn Univursily [email protected] Abstract '171~higniticwtce of Prahat Phimrii cnn k u~trihutedto %\,em1 culh~rulvaltlcs und the in~e~g-ity or the ~~hi(wli1~1heritage afid il* laadscn~huvc con~inued~hn>ttghr~ui time, II caiild hc ~iddhat IM piam is a cultnml Ianclwrlpc. tlr~weuer,its Iqck of;) ptowr tnilnng~nllenlplan and lhe. iapr{bpcr uscs of SOAU: of the buildi~lpado nral pyote ~hcprr1pr uplx.et.intion n the visitom of its vignificuncc ;md interpretive value. ThereTow. this x*ilrb nl' the Illunigcmnl plan of an hih~nzicsite as u cultural t;lrldsc;l~ aucrnptx lo r~~vEy/canrlrvaIunIe lk utlluc and thcn oiTcr sugp~tinrlsfor ;I proper Irtsimm plan w well propoxc iw wemll 1anpccm1rwinugcmenl pI:m for futurc a=, Thor ~(uJyCwuseh mninly on ~hc.w?;~ui~l;lhili~ fit' l~nd-u~ ~IIcultural laurkni and d~cct>nservil~ion of the rui,\ti?g ai-clii~ectumand 1amEr;capc. Introduction Travcl and [nurim are considpad the WrrW's Lugst generdtom oT,iabs and wealth (World Travel ;md Twrisia Cwwll - WTTC, 2004). Accnrdil~g tu !he World Travel Organiwtion (WW).the numkr rjf tourists visiting tha Asian hcilic region rMe ld 104 n~illionurrivals in 21WW and i$l'mcast to mh1 %80 millinn in 20lt). Thew figures imply that tbe averdgts UIIIIUILIgr~wth rate will psak ut 6.7 pcnwl (WTO, IWb).
    [Show full text]
  • Mekong Cultural Diversity Beyond Borders
    TABATA Yukitsugu, SATO Katsura (eds.) Mekong Cultural Diversity Beyond Borders Proceedings for the International Seminar & Symposium on Southeast Asian Cultural Heritage Studies Today March 2020 Institute for Cultural Heritage, Waseda University TABATA Yukitsugu, SATO Katsura (eds.) Mekong Cultural Diversity Beyond Borders Proceedings for the International Seminar & Symposium on Southeast Asian Cultural Heritage Studies Today March 2020 Institute for Cultural Heritage, Waseda University Notes The following are the proceedings of the International Seminar "Southeast Asian Cultural Heritage Studies Today" and Symposium "To Know and Share about Cultural Heritage" held on 23, 24 and 25 January, 2020, organized by the Institute for Cultural Heritage, Waseda University, as part of the project commissioned by the Agency for Cultural Affairs. Each paper of the Seminar was prepared by the presenter. The record of the Symposium was edited based on the presentation materials and audio recordings. 例 言 本報告書は、2020 年 1 月 23 日、24 日、25 日に文化庁委託事業として早稲田大学文化財総合調査研究所が開催した 国際研究会「東南アジア文化遺産研究の現在」及びシンポジウム「文化遺産を知り、そして伝える」の内容を収録した ものである。研究会の論考は各発表者により書き下ろされた。シンポジウムについては発表資料及び録音記録に基づい て編集した。 Mekong Cultural Diversity Beyond Borders Proceedings for the International Seminar & Symposium on Southeast Asian Cultural Heritage Studies Today March 2020 Published by Institute for Cultural Heritage, Waseda University Toyama 1-24-1, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8644, Japan TEL & FAX +81-(0)3-5286-3647 Edited by TABATA Yukitsugu, SATO Katsura © Agency for Cultural Affairs & Institute for Cultural Heritage, Waseda University All rights reserved. Table of Contents Part I Seminar on Southeast Asian Cultural Heritage Studies Today [Opening Remarks] What is the Creativity of the World Heritage Cities in Mekong Basin Countries ? ...... 1 NAKAGAWA Takeshi 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Royal Roads to Angkor
    Chapter Four The Royal Roads of King Jayavarman VII and its Architectural Remains 4.1 King Jayavarman VII’s Royal Roads 4.1.1 General Information Jayavarman VII’s Royal Roads was believed (by many scholars) to be built in the era of Jayavarman VII who ruled Khmer empire between AD 1812 – 1218. The road network not only cover the area of the modern-day Cambodia but also the large areas of the present Laos, Thailand and Vietnam that were under the control of the empire as well. As demonstrated by Ooi Keat Gin in Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopeida from Angkor Wat to East Timor Volume Two; highways were built—straight, stone-paved roads running across hundreds of kilometers, raised above the flood level, with stone bridges across rivers and lined with rest houses every 15 kilometers. Parts of some roads are still visible, even serving as the bed for modern roads. From the capital city, Angkor, there were at least two roads to the east and two to the west. One of the latter ran across the Dangrek Mountains to Phimai and another went due west toward Sisophon, which means toward the only lowland pass from Cambodia into eastern Thailand in the direction of Lopburi or Ayutthaya. Toward the east, one road has been traced almost to the Mekong, and according to an inscription in which these roads are described, it may continue as far as the capital of Champa1 1 Ooi. (2004). Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopeida from Angkor Wat to East Timor Volume Two, (California: ABC-CLIO.inc.) pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution, Reform and Regionalism in Southeast Asia
    Revolution, Reform and Regionalism in Southeast Asia Geographically, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam are situated in the fastest growing region in the world, positioned alongside the dynamic economies of neighboring China and Thailand. Revolution, Reform and Regionalism in Southeast Asia compares the postwar political economies of these three countries in the context of their individual and collective impact on recent efforts at regional integration. Based on research carried out over three decades, Ronald Bruce St John highlights the different paths to reform taken by these countries and the effect this has had on regional plans for economic development. Through its comparative analysis of the reforms implemented by Cam- bodia, Laos and Vietnam over the last 30 years, the book draws attention to parallel themes of continuity and change. St John discusses how these countries have demonstrated related characteristics whilst at the same time making different modifications in order to exploit the strengths of their individual cultures. The book contributes to the contemporary debate over the role of democratic reform in promoting economic devel- opment and provides academics with a unique insight into the political economies of three countries at the heart of Southeast Asia. Ronald Bruce St John earned a Ph.D. in International Relations at the University of Denver before serving as a military intelligence officer in Vietnam. He is now an independent scholar and has published more than 300 books, articles and reviews with a focus on Southeast Asia,
    [Show full text]
  • The Puzzling Absence of Ethnicity-Based Political Cleavages in Northeastern Thailand
    Proud to be Thai: The Puzzling Absence of Ethnicity- Based Political Cleavages in Northeastern Thailand Jacob I. Ricks Abstract Underneath the veneer of a homogenous state-approved Thai ethnicity, Thailand is home to a heterogeneous population. Only about one-third of Thailand’s inhabitants speak the national language as their mother tongue; multiple alternate ethnolinguistic groups comprise the remainder of the population, with the Lao in the northeast, often called Isan people, being the largest at 28 percent of the population. Ethnic divisions closely align with areas of political party strength: the Thai Rak Thai Party and its subsequent incarnations have enjoyed strong support from Isan people and Khammuang speakers in the north while the Democrat Party dominates among the Thai- and Paktay-speaking people of the central plains and the south. Despite this confluence of ethnicity and political party support, we see very little mobilization along ethnic cleavages. Why? I argue that ethnic mobilization remains minimal because of the large-scale public acceptance and embrace of the government-approved Thai identity. Even among the country’s most disadvantaged, such as Isan people, support is still strong for “Thai-ness.” Most inhabitants of Thailand espouse the mantra that to Copyright (c) Pacific Affairs. All rights reserved. be Thai is superior to being labelled as part of an alternate ethnic group. I demonstrate this through the application of large-scale survey data as well as a set of interviews with self-identified Isan people. The findings suggest that the Thai state has successfully inculcated a sense of national identity Delivered by Ingenta to IP: 192.168.39.151 on: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:54:19 among the Isan people and that ethnic mobilization is hindered by ardent nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Khmer Civilization in Isan Khemita Visudharomn School of Architecture, Assumption University Bangkok, Thailand
    AU J.T. 8(4): 178-184 (Apr. 2005) Khmer Civilization in Isan Khemita Visudharomn School of Architecture, Assumption University Bangkok, Thailand Abstract Follow the footsteps of Khmer civilization from Angkor Wat to the center of cultural heritage in northeastern Thailand, Phimai, Phanom Rung and Mueang Tam. This paper is both an introduction and guide to Khmer temples in Isan. The first part begins with historical details tracing the Angkorean from the 8th to 12th century, and introduces a background to the religious traditions of the Khmer, which both inspired and governed the concept and execution of all their art and architecture. The second part is an emphasis on architecture and decorative art, which appear in Khmer temples. In its heyday the main concentration of Khmer temples extended far west to the border and associated with an area of the middle Mekong River in the southern part of northeastern Thailand. Keywords: cultural heritage, Phimai, Phanom Rung, Mueang Tam, the Angkorean, religious traditions, architecture and decorative art 1. Introduction The other sources of information on this period are Chinese accounts and references, in The name “Isan” refers to the these to tributary states such as Funan and northeastern part of Thailand .It covers an area Chenla. of one third of the Kingdom. Isan, is also th th known as the Khorat Plateau. The Phetchabun 2.1 Angkorean (8 - 12 century) Rage separates Isan from the Central Region while the Dongrek Mountains in the south The art and architecture of the Khmer has separate Thailand from Cambodia. The Mun been classified into periods, by French art and Chi Rivers drain the majority of the historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Scenes
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 565 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to your submissions, we always guarantee that your feed- back goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. Verlaine, Khun Buasone and Prapaporn Sompakdee OUR READERS provided great assistance, while Laura, Nick, Rich and Many thanks to the travellers who used the last the rest of the Lonely Planet team were a pleasure to edition and wrote to us with helpful hints, useful work with, as always. Finally, a special thanks to my advice and interesting anecdotes: wife, Suttawan, for help on this book and much more. Alessandra Furlan, Alexandra van den Broek, Allan Marsden, Ariane Bouf, Di Swanson, Ellis Gladstone, Greg Bloom Harmen Keuning, Helen Newman, Irmi Chamberlain, Big thanks to Lina in Siem Reap and to Nick for the Julia Wilber, Kelly Eberhard, Kennedy Newton, Kylie useful tips on the ever-changing Cambodian travel Tanabe, Lois Taylor, Mark Armitage, Matt Thwaite, scene.
    [Show full text]
  • National Catholic Reporter
    Seing Red: Amencan Foreign Policy Towards Vietnam and the Khmer Rouge, 1975 to 1982 Brenda Fewster A Thesis in The Department of History Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Ans at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada April2000 0 Brenda Fewster, 2000 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 ,,na& du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington StmBt 395. rue Wdlingtori OnawaON KlAON4 OitawaON K1AW Canada CaMda The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seil reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microforni, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT Seeing Red: Arnerican Foreign Policy Towards Vietnam and the Khmer Rouge, 1975- 1982 Brenda Fewster Between 1979 and 1982 the US supported the Khmer Rouge in the refiigee camps along the Thai-Cambodian border, in the Security Council of the United Nations, and in behind-closed-doors discussions seeking to ensure a place for the Khmer Rouge (as an med force) in a coalition government.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom of Cambodia the Temple of Preah Vihear Inscribed on the World Heritage List (Unesco) Since 2008
    KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA THE TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR INSCRIBED ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST (UNESCO) SINCE 2008 Edited by the Office of the Council of Ministers PHNOM PENH MAY 2010 ON THE SUCCESSFUL INSCRIPTION OF THE TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST (07 July 2008, Quebec, Canada during the 32nd session of the World Heritage Committee) “This is a new sense of pride for the people of our Kingdom, as well as for all the people in the region and the world that the Temple of Preah Vihear was recognized by ICOMOS as an outstanding masterpiece of Khmer architecture with an outstanding universal value, and was inscribed on the World Heritage List.” “The inscription of the Temple of Preah Vihear requires the international community as a whole to protect and preserve this world heritage for the benefits of future gen- erations.” Samdech Akka Moha Sena Padei Techo HUN SEN Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Cambodia, 08 July 2008 “In fact, the Decision of the 31st session of the World Heritage Committee in Christchurch, New Zealand, July 2007 contains 3 conditions. First, it is essential that Cambodia strengthens the conservation of the Temple; second, Cambodia must develop an appropriate management plan and submit it to the World Heritage Centre by 01 February 2008, because the review process would take up many months until July, to see whether or not our management plan is appropriate; and third, Cambodia and Thailand should develop a close cooperation in support of the inscription. If Cambodia fulfills these three conditions, then in 2008 the inscription will be automatic.
    [Show full text]
  • Waeng Phalangwan - a Lao-Isan Perspective on Thai Lukthung
    Review Article: Waeng Phalangwan - A Lao-Isan perspective on Thai Lukthung Mr. James Mitchell1 Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia Abstract In Lukthung Isan, Waeng Phalangwan (2002) makes a case for recognition of the Isan involvement in phleng lukthung, usually translated as Thai country music. The significant involvement of Isan people within the lukthung music industry has provided Isan people with an effective way of influencing Central Thai culture, when most other avenues were closed. The article examines Waeng’s Lao-Isan identity and his use of standard tropes to disguise a defiant radicalism. The centrepiece of Waeng’s argument is a revision of the history of ‘the king of Thai country music,’ Suraphon Sombatjaroen. Phalangwan redefines Suraphon’s current status as the symbol of Central Thai cultural supremacy by placing him within the context of two contemporaries, the Isan songwriters Chaloemchai Siruechai and Benjamin. Waeng’s history of Isan singers and groups of Isan songwriters in Bangkok during the late 1960s and 1970s can be cross- referenced with establishment histories to make possible a reinterpretation of the development of lukthung. The closing chapter of Lukthung Isan, detailing the existence of ‘communist’ lukthung, suggests that a re-evaluation of the counter-hegemonic potential of lukthung may be warranted. 1 Mailing Address: 256 Mu 5 Baan Hua Tanon, T. Pralap, Muang Khon Kaen 40000 Thailand Ph: 66 43 265079 (Thailand) Email: [email protected] or [email protected] The Journal of Lao Studies, Volume 2, Issue 1, pps 66-96. ISSN - Pending. Published by the Center for Lao Studies at www.laostudies.org Mitchell 67 Isan natives are like people of African descent.
    [Show full text]
  • Preah Vihear World Heritage Sit
    No. 678, Group 1, Phum Tavien, Siem Reap City, CAMBODIA H/P: +85512 971 645 E-maiL: [email protected], [email protected] WebSite: www.cambodiatraveLtraiLS.com …………………………………………………………………………………………….......................................... Tour Name: Preah Vihear WorLd Heritage Site Guided ExcurSion Tour Code: A1N Tour Duration: 1 day Tour Operates: alL year round / on demand Number of Pax: avaiLable upon requeSt Tour Price: avaiLable upon requeSt Pick-up and drop off location Can be anywhere upon request HoteL in Siem Reap Upon arrivaL in Siem Reap airport Upon arrivaL in Siem Reap buS Station Upon arrivaL in boat pier in Chong Kneah fLoating viLLage Any AirBnB and residences in Siem Reap. Pick-up and drop-off direction Kindly provide your pick-up and drop-off StyLes for direction! PREAH VIHEAR WORLD HERITAGE SITE GUIDED EXCURSION Preah Vihear – in the morning, you will be met and welcomed by our English Speaking guide, picked up and tranSferred onward to viSit Preah Vihear TempLe. It iS Situated atop cLiff in the Preah Vihear province of northern Cambodia (180 kiLometerS from Angkor Wat) and on the border of KantharaLak diStrict (amphoe) in SiSaket province of eastern ThaiLand. In 1962, folLowing a Lengthy diSpute between ThaiLand and Cambodia over ownerShip, a majority of the International Court of Justice in The Hague awarded the temple to Cambodia. Affording a view for many kiLometerS acrosS a pLain, PraSat Preah Vihear haS the most SpectacuLar Setting of aLL the tempLeS buiLt during the Six-centurieS-long Khmer Empire. AS a key edifice of the empire's Spiritual life, it waS supported and modified by successive kings and so bears eLements of severaL architecturaL styLes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia's Dirty Dozen
    HUMAN RIGHTS CAMBODIA’S DIRTY DOZEN A Long History of Rights Abuses by Hun Sen’s Generals WATCH Cambodia’s Dirty Dozen A Long History of Rights Abuses by Hun Sen’s Generals Copyright © 2018 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-36222 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JUNE 2018 ISBN: 978-1-6231-36222 Cambodia’s Dirty Dozen A Long History of Rights Abuses by Hun Sen’s Generals Map of Cambodia ............................................................................................................... 7 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Khmer Rouge-era Abuses .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]