DOCSLIB.ORG

Bertrand Russell and China During and After His Visit in 1920

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bertrand Russell and China During and After His Visit in 1920 Bertrand Russell and China During and After His Visit in 1920 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Paisley, John. 2020. Bertrand Russell and China During and After His Visit in 1920. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365614 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Bertrand Russell and China during and after His Visit in 1920 John Paisley A Thesis in the Field of History for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in E$tension Studies Harvard University (ove)ber 2020 Copyright 2020 John Paisley Abstra+t Bertrand Russell visited China in late 1920 to tea+h philosophy at Peking 'ni&ersity- He expe+ted his sabbati+al to relie&e his stressful experience of the First .orld .ar. Instead, he entered China in the midst of what is now called the May Fourth ove)ent0 a groundbreaking period in whi+h a “(e1 Culture3 was being constructed in response to China4s persistent international weakness. Many Chinese looked to Russell for ans1ers on its social re+onstru+tion, and in vie1 of this fa+t his visit is often dis)issed as having had no i)pa+t. But this misreads Russell4s o1n intentions for his trip, while also ignoring the several years he spent advocating for China in Britain after he returned. This thesis provides a full history of Bertrand Russell4s conne+tion to China in the years 1920–27. Using Chinese language sources, it re+onstructs his ti)e in China from O+tober 1920 to July 1921. This story, much of it focusing on Chinese responses to Russell, provides another angle from whi+h to vie1 the May Fourth period—the experien+es of a sympatheti+ .estern philosopher hailed as a “%e+ond Confucius3 upon arrival- It then turns to Russell4s i)pa+t on the British side of the relationshi*- At his 1el+ome banquet in Shanghai on O+tober 14, 1920, Bertrand Russell bal,ed at his host4s request for advi+e on how to “fi$3 China0 instead responding 2how could I presume to le+ture China on its re+onstruction? China is not alone in this need< Europe too needs re+onstruction. It is through the refor)ation of Europe that I hope to play a role in assisting the Chinese people=3 This thesis finds that when Russell4s visit is vie1ed in this light0 his indire+t i)*a+t on China was more signifi+ant and lasting. Table of Contents !ist of Figures----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------& Chapter 1. Introduction--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Bertrand Russell and His Perception of China prior to 1914-----------------------------------6 Chapter 2. Bertrand Russell0 China and the trau)a of the First .orld .ar----------------------14 Bertrand Russell4s Anti1ar A+tivities and China-ga?ing during ../-----------------14 Principles of Social Reconstruction, Political Ideals, Roads to Freedom-------------19 China4s Intelle+tual A1akening and Introduction to Bertrand Russell------------------22 Russell Visits Russia0 and an Invitation from China----------------------------------------------31 Chapter 3. Bertrand Russell Visits China and China Moves Forward, 1920-1922-----------@6 A Breakne+, Introduction: Shanghai to Changsha, O+tober 14–28, 1920------------39 China Debates Some Proposed Roads to National ReCuvenation--------------------------DD Russell4s A+tive Period in BeiCing, Part I: Nove)ber and De+e)ber 1920----------ED Russell4s A+tive Period in BeiCing, Part II: January to March 1921----------------------B: Illness, Re+overy and Refle+tionA Russell4s Fare1ell Address, July 1921------------91 China Internali?es Russell4s Visit and Moves For1ard, 1921-1922 and Later----102 Chapter 4. Bertrand Russell and the Informal China Lobby in Britain, 1921-1927--------126 Russell on the “Proble) of China3 and the Great Powers, 1921-1923---------------130 The Boxer Inde)nity and a Ne1 Labour Government, 1923-1925--------------------147 Russell4s Opposition under a Conservative Government0 1925-1927-----------------163 Chapter 5. Conclusion—Bertrand Russell Reha"ilitated as a “Friend of China3------------189 Bibliography--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------215 i& !ist of Figures Figure 1: An advertise)ent for Nanyang Brothers Toba++o Com*any in Minguo Ribao, (ove)ber 3, 1920.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------205 Figure 2: Advertise)ent for DeRuc+i in Xi’an Xianyang International Airport. (Photo by author0 2019)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------207 Figure 3: En+ounters bet1een China and Mi+hael Sandel0 Professor of Government at Harvard University-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------209 Figure 4: The future sells, .estern spea,ers wanted. (SourceA JouTubeI-----------------------209 Figure 5: Red Star Over China (1937) by Edgar Sno1 and The Problem of China by Bertrand Russell---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------212 & Chapter 1 Introduction In 1969 the historian Jonathan Spence published To Change China, a book in 1hi+h he des+ri"ed, via a series of vignettes, the 300-year history of .esterners who visited China with the intention of transforming it a++ording to a predefined plan.1 .hether writing about the Jesuit Ferdinand Verbiest from the 17th century or the Bolshevik Mikhail Borodin and A)eri+an General Joseph Stil1ell from the 20th, these visitors “1ere sure that their own civili?ation, whatever its short+omings, had given the) something valid to offer, something that China la+ked.” In ea+h case, the visitor either left disappointed or was “+hanged” by China instead. T1o high-profile visitors to China0 John De1ey and Bertrand Russell0 are not )entioned in Spence4s book. This was no oversight, despite their superfi+ially appearing to be pri)e candidates for inclusion. As t1o of the leading philosophers of their era0 De1ey and Russell traveled separately to China soon after the First .orld .ar to tea+h philosophy at Peking University- As the chief proponents of their respe+tive thought syste)s, De1ey of Pragmatis) and Russell of Logi+al Analysis, ea+h must have gone 1ith some intention of making ne1 converts in the classroom- Ea+h is no1 generally vie1ed as leaving China0 in the words of John King Fairbank, ha&ing produced “only superfi+ial3 results-2 1 Jonathan Spen+e0 To Change China: Western Advisers in China 1620-"'#% (Boston: Little0 Brown, 1969). This was reprinted in 1980 by Penguin Books. 2 John King Fairbank, The Great Chinese Revolution, 1800-"')* ((e1 Jor,A Harper Collins, 1986), 201. Fairbank’s con+lusion was of De1ey’s visit, but he would have applied it to Russell as well- 1 However0 for Bertrand Russell0 the circumstan+es around his choosing to go to China, his expe+tations for his visit0 and his feelings upon his return brea, sharply with the pattern des+ribed by Spence-@ Russell arrived at the invitation of his Chinese hosts in the midst of what is now called the May Fourth Move)ent0 a period that sa1 an influential cohort of Chinese reformers look to the .est for inspiration on ho1 to change China. In the words of Liang Qi+hao in Nove)ber 1920, “China4s cultural move)ent has until no1 e)phasi?ed an absolute0 unrestri+ted i)portation” of foreign ideas0 “1e open our doors wide and wel+ome all modern ideas of value-3: As for Russell4s obje+ti&es for going: “I was invited to le+ture on philosophy in the University of Peking, and I ca)e prepared with purely a+ade)i+ le+tures on psychology and the principles of physi+s-3D .hen he learned his audience instead wanted hi) to propose solutions for “fixing” China, he adapted out of a desire to satisfy while also determining it best to avoid to the extent possible ma,ing com)ents on China4s internal affairs, about whi+h he openly admitted his o1n ignoran+e. He left China neither disappointed nor funda)entally +hanged in his basi+ vie1s, but re-energi?ed to continue beyond the First .orld .ar to +hallenge the Great Powers through his publi+ a+tivities, now bolstered by his firsthand 3 The sa)e can be said to a large extent for De1ey as well, though his visit to China is not the fo+us of this thesis. For book-length studies of De1ey in China, see Barry Keenan, The De,e- Experiment in China: Educational Reform and Political Power in the Earl- Republic (Ca)bridge, MAA Harvard 'niversity Press, 1977). Jessi+a Ching-%?e .ang, 0ohn De,e- in China: To Teach and to Learn (Albany: %tate University of Ne1 Jor, Press, 2007)- 4 2Jiangxueshe huanying luosu zhi shenghui 讲学社欢迎罗素之盛会03 Chenbao 《晨报》1920 年 11 月 10 日. Liang was a+tually likely dire+ting his com)ents in part towards Hu Shi, who was unhappy 1ith Russell stealing any of the spotlight from John De1ey, and also to the students of Peking University 1ho were be+oming increasingly ena)ored of Bolshevis). In other words, it was a warning not to be+ome too focused on one .estern model to the e$+lusion of all others, but this si)ply supports the point being )ade here- 5 Bertrand Russell, “To the Editor of ‘%hanghai Life403 Shanghai Life, De+e)ber 21, 1920. His Mpsychology’ le+tures focused on philosophy of Mind. Russell was also intensely interested in Einstein’s Relati&ity Theory (his ‘physi+s’ le+tures) in large part for its philosophi+al i)pli+ations. 2 kno1ledge of one of its “vi+ti)s-3 It was an experien+e he cherished for the rest of his life- This is not the vie1 of Russell4s trip to China taken by the only maCor full-length study in English.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chinese Christians and American Missionaries in the Republic of China (1912-1949)
    Rowan University Rowan Digital Works Theses and Dissertations 10-17-2016 Finding Chinese Jesus: Chinese Christians and American missionaries in the Republic of China (1912-1949) Matthew Joseph Douthitt Rowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd Part of the Asian History Commons, and the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Douthitt, Matthew Joseph, "Finding Chinese Jesus: Chinese Christians and American missionaries in the Republic of China (1912-1949)" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 2335. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/2335 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Rowan Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Rowan Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FINDING CHINESE JESUS: CHINESE CHRISTIANS AND AMERICAN MISSIONARIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA (1912-1949) by Matthew J Douthitt A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History College of Humanities and Social Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirement For the degree of Master of Arts in History at Rowan University May 16, 2016 Thesis Chair: Q. Edward Wang, Ph.D © 2016 Matthew J Douthitt Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my mom who is always there for me. Acknowledgments Developing this thesis has been quite a learning experience for me. I would like express my deepest thanks to the entire History Department at Rowan University for their warm reception upon my arrival and their constant encouragement throughout my studies. Specifically, I would like to thank Dr. Joy Wiltenburg and Dr. Scott Morschauser for being a part of the thesis committee and offering their advice.
    [Show full text]
  • February 04, 1949 Memorandum of Conversation Between Anastas Mikoyan and Mao Zedong
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified February 04, 1949 Memorandum of Conversation between Anastas Mikoyan and Mao Zedong Citation: “Memorandum of Conversation between Anastas Mikoyan and Mao Zedong,” February 04, 1949, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, APRF: F. 39, Op. 1, D. 39, Ll. 54-62. Reprinted in Andrei Ledovskii, Raisa Mirovitskaia and Vladimir Miasnikov, Sovetsko-Kitaiskie Otnosheniia, Vol. 5, Book 2, 1946-February 1950 (Moscow: Pamiatniki Istoricheskoi Mysli, 2005), pp. 66-72. Translated by Sergey Radchenko. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/113318 Summary: Anastas Mikoyan and Mao Zedong discuss the independence of Mongolia, the independence movement in Xinjiang, the construction of a railroad in Xinjiang, CCP contacts with the VKP(b), the candidate for Chinese ambassador to the USSR, aid from the USSR to China, CCP negotiations with the Guomindang, the preparatory commisssion for convening the PCM, the character of future rule in China, Chinese treaties with foreign powers, and the Sino-Soviet treaty. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation On 4 February 1949 another meeting with Mao Zedong took place in the presence of CCP CC Politburo members Zhou Enlai, Liu Shaoqi, Ren Bishi, Zhu De and the interpreter Shi Zhe. From our side Kovalev I[van]. V. and Kovalev E.F. were present. THE NATIONAL QUESTION I conveyed to Mao Zedong that our CC does not advise the Chinese Com[munist] Party to go overboard in the national question by means of providing independence to national minorities and thereby reducing the territory of the Chinese state in connection with the communists' take-over of power.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download 7.3 Mb
    Between Shanghai and Mecca: Diaspora and Diplomacy of Chinese Muslims in the Twentieth Century by Janice Hyeju Jeong Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Engseng Ho, Advisor ___________________________ Prasenjit Duara, Advisor ___________________________ Nicole Barnes ___________________________ Adam Mestyan ___________________________ Cemil Aydin Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT Between Shanghai and Mecca: Diaspora and Diplomacy of Chinese Muslims in the Twentieth Century by Janice Hyeju Jeong Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Engseng Ho, Advisor ___________________________ Prasenjit Duara, Advisor ___________________________ Nicole Barnes ___________________________ Adam Mestyan ___________________________ Cemil Aydin An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Janice Hyeju Jeong 2019 Abstract While China’s recent Belt and the Road Initiative and its expansion across Eurasia is garnering public and scholarly attention, this dissertation recasts the space of Eurasia as one connected through historic Islamic networks between Mecca and China. Specifically, I show that eruptions of
    [Show full text]
  • Bickers, Thesis 1992
    Bickers, R. (1992). Changing British Attitudes to China and the Chinese, 1928-1931: Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document Copyright Robert Bickers, 1992 University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Changing British Attitudes to China and the Chinese, 1928-1931 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosphy Robert A. Bickers School of Oriental and African Studies University of London 1992 Copyright 1992 Robert Bickers Abstract This study examines the context and nature of British attitudes to China and the Chinese in the period 1928 to 1931, between the initial consolidation of the Nationalist Revolution in China and the Japanese invasion of Manchuria. The relationship between official and popular levels of this discourse provides the dominant theme of this work. It is argued that these years saw the start of a major long-term shift in British attitudes prompted by the Nationalist Revolution and by changes in Britain's official policy towards China. A wide range of official, institutional, and private primary and secondary material relating to Sino-British relations and to British treaty port life in China is examined in order to identify the sources, nature, and influence of British attitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Membership of the Independent Labour Party, 1904–10
    DEI AN HOP KIN THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE INDEPENDENT LABOUR PARTY, 1904-10: A SPATIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL ANALYSIS E. P. Thompson expressed succinctly the prevailing orthodoxy about the origins of the Independent Labour Party when he wrote, in his homage to Tom Maguire, that "the ILP grew from bottom up".1 From what little evidence has been available, it has been argued that the ILP was essentially a provincial party, which was created from the fusion of local political groups concentrated mainly on an axis lying across the North of England. An early report from the General Secretary of the party described Lancashire and Yorkshire as the strongholds of the movement, and subsequent historical accounts have supported this view.2 The evidence falls into three categories. In the first place labour historians have often relied on the sparse and often imperfect memoirs of early labour and socialist leaders. While the central figures of the movement have been reticent in their memoirs, very little literature of any kind has emerged from among the ordinary members of the party, and as a result this has often been a poor source. The official papers of the ILP have been generally more satisfactory. The in- evitable gaps in the annual reports of the party can be filled to some extent from party newspapers, both local and national. There is a formality, nevertheless, about official transactions which reduces their value. Minute books reveal little about the members. Finally, it is possible to cull some information from a miscellany of other sources; newspapers, electoral statistics, parliamentary debates and reports, and sometimes the memoirs of individuals whose connection 1 "Homage to Tom Maguire", in: Essays in Labour History, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Zhou Zuoren's Critique of Violence in Modern China
    World Languages and Cultures Publications World Languages and Cultures 2014 The aS cred and the Cannibalistic: Zhou Zuoren’s Critique of Violence in Modern China Tonglu Li Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/language_pubs Part of the Chinese Studies Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ language_pubs/102. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the World Languages and Cultures at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in World Languages and Cultures Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS cred and the Cannibalistic: Zhou Zuoren’s Critique of Violence in Modern China Abstract This article explores the ways in which Zhou Zuoren critiqued violence in modern China as a belief-‐‑driven phenomenon. Differing from Lu Xun and other mainstream intellectuals, Zhou consistently denied the legitimacy of violence as a force for modernizing China. Relying on extensive readings in anthropology, intellectual history, and religious studies, he investigated the fundamental “nexus” between violence and the religious, political, and ideological beliefs. In the Enlightenment’s effort to achieve modernity, cannibalistic Confucianism was to be cleansed from the corpus of Chinese culture as the “barbaric” cultural Other, but Zhou was convinced that such barbaric cannibalism was inherited by the Enlightenment thinkers, and thus made the Enlightenment impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One Introduction
    ICT1 21/8/00 6:44 PM Page 1 Chapter One Introduction The past is always altered for motives that reflect present needs. We reshape our heritage to make it attractive in modern terms; we seek to make it part of ourselves, and ourselves part of it; we confirm it to our self-images and aspirations. Rendered grand or homely, magnified or tarnished, history is continually altered in our private interests or on behalf of our community or country. —David Lowenthal, The Past Is a Foreign Country History connects past with present. This connection is established by and, generally, also for the present. Yet, the ways in which his- torians write history vary tremendously: History is and has been written differently for different purposes.1 In order to cast light on present events, for example, one can simply collect and preserve any available information about the past. What prompted Herodotus (484–424? B.C.E.) to write his Histories, as he professed at its outset, was to prevent the memory of the Greeks about their glorious victory over the Persians from falling into oblivion. In China where historical writing has long been an integral part of its civilization, there is a well-known adage, “to know the future in the mirror of the past” (jian wang zhi lai), that expresses a similar desire to remember past events for better understanding the present and 1 ICT1 21/8/00 6:44 PM Page 2 2 INTRODUCTION successfully speculating upon the future. While interest in the past of this sort is shown in many historical cultures, contributing to the development of historical study, it by no means addresses fully the complex relationship between past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Manchesterhive.Com at 09/25/2021 02:53:58AM Via Free Access
    9 Public commentary on familiar themes The ‘herd instinct’ versus the individual Throughout this book, contemporary evidence has been the key to unlocking the emotions of the past – both private and public. Although some excerpts have appeared from the numerous books and memoirs generated by the war (and largely written after the event), comparatively little evidence has been cited from the wider contemporary sphere, the exception being the case of the Cambridge Magazine’s vocal support of Bertrand Russell as part of its balanced and humane view of the wider conflict. Now it is perhaps appropriate that some attention is drawn to contemporary newspapers and periodicals – jour- nalistic reactions fully exposed to public scrutiny and in contrast to the en- closed world of intimate diaries and letters. In summing up one of the main themes of humanistic and aesthetic opposi- tion to the Great War – the friction that existed between the structure of the war-state with its resultant ‘herd instinct’ and notions of the sacredness of the individual – there is perhaps no more apposite personal example than that of Gilbert Cannan, an individual who, like Bertrand Russell, specifically projected his concerns into the public sphere. Cannan was a friend of D.H. Lawrence (who, together with his wife, had moved to Buckinghamshire in August 1914 to be near Cannan and his wife Mary), and he saw himself as a defender of that which he described as ‘a man’s most precious possession’ – human dignity. He had first expounded on this theme in an article for the
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing and Reconstructing Images of Chinese Women in Lin Yutang's Translations, Adaptations and Rewritings
    CONSTRUCTING AND RECONSTRUCTING IMAGES OF CHINESE WOMEN IN LIN YUTANG'S TRANSLATIONS, ADAPTATIONS AND REWRITINGS by Fang Lu B.A., Beijing Normal University, 1987 M.A., Beijing Normal University, 1990 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Under Special Arrangement Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences © Fang Lu 2008 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2008 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-46812-8 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-46812-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of War Aims and the Treaty of Versailles Callaghan, JT
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Salford Institutional Repository The problem of war aims and the Treaty of Versailles Callaghan, JT Titl e The problem of war aims and the Treaty of Versailles Aut h or s Callaghan, JT Typ e Book Section URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/46240/ Published Date 2 0 1 8 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non- commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected] . 13 The problem of war aims and the Treaty of Versailles John Callaghan Why did Britain go to war in 1914? The answer that generated popular approval concerned the defence of Belgian neutrality, defiled by German invasion in the execution of the Schlieffen Plan. Less appealing, and therefore less invoked for public consumption, but broadly consistent with this promoted justification, was Britain’s long-standing interest in maintaining a balance of power on the continent, which a German victory would not only disrupt, according to Foreign Office officials, but replace with a ‘political dictatorship’ inimical to political freedom.1 Yet only 6 days before the British declaration of war, on 30 July, the chairman of the Liberal Foreign Affairs Group, Arthur Ponsonby, informed Prime Minister Asquith that ‘nine tenths of the [Liberal] party’ supported neutrality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Bertrand Russell
    CRUSADER AND CASSANDRA CRUSADER AND CASSANDRA: THE POLITICS OF BERTRAND RUSSELL By RON GOLDSTEIN, B. A. A Thesis Submitteo to the Faculty of Graouate Stuoies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University July, 1977 MASTER OF ARTS (1977) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (Political Science) Hamilton, Ontario. TITLE: Crusader and Cassandra: The Politics of Bertrand Russell AUTHOR: Ron Goldstein, B. A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Derry Novak NUMBER OF PAGES: (iv) 127 (ii) A C K NOW LED GEM E N T S My first thanks are to Kenneth Blackwell, archivist of McMaster University's Bertrand Russell Archives, for his advice and knowledge on so many aspects of Russell's life and work, and to his assistant, Diane M. Kerss. Both gave freely of their time with unfailing courtesy, and were of great assistance to me. Carole B. Forhan deserves my unqualified appreciation for her patience and the excellent typing of the many drafts of the manuscript. My thanks go also to Professors Derry Novak, Howard ~ster, and Louis Greenspan, who read the manuscript and offered both encour­ agement and invaluable advice. (iii) TABLE OF C01'TTENTS Page Preface 1 I The Life of The Mind (1) quman }\!ature 5 (2) Education and Individuality .~ 19 II Russell, Marx and Socialism ( l) From liberal humanist to socialist ravolu­ tionary--and back to liberal again •• 49 (2) Russell contra Marx 55 (3) Russell and the Labour Party •• 76 III The Pur sui t of Peace.. •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• 83 IV Conclusion.. .. .. ... .. .. .• .. .. ... .. .• is.. 109 Bibliography .•.•........... ., ...... 116 (iv) PREFACE The principal theme of this study of Bertrand Russell is that from his unique position as the last of a notable line of English Whig reformers and as the "godson" of John Stuart Mill, "the saint of rationalism", he attempted to make a unique contribution to political philosophy--and failed.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Decade Immediately Following the Second World War, Many Of
    ‘A Central Issue of Our Time’: Academic Freedom in Postwar American Thought A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Julian Tzara Nemeth August 2007 2 This thesis titled ‘A Central Issue of Our Time’: Academic Freedom in Postwar American Thought by JULIAN TZARA NEMETH has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Kevin Mattson Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract NEMETH, JULIAN TZARA., M.A, August 2007, History ‘A Central Issue of Our Time’: Academic Freedom in Postwar American Thought (108 pp.) Director of Thesis: Kevin Mattson In the early years of the Cold War, more than one hundred American academics lost their jobs because university administrators suspected them of Communist Party membership. How did intellectuals respond to this crisis? Referring to contemporary books, articles, organizational statements, and correspondence, I argue that disputes over academic freedom helped shatter a tenuous liberal consensus, unite conservatives, and challenge defenses of professorial liberty among academia’s largest professional organization, the American Association of University Professors. Specifically, I show how Sidney Hook and Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s dispute over academic freedom was representative of larger quarrels among liberals over McCarthyism. Conversely, I demonstrate that conservatives such as William Buckley Jr. and Russell Kirk overcame serious differences on academic freedom to present a united front against liberalism, in and outside of the academy. Finally, I show the difficulty an organization such as the AAUP encounters when defending professional values in a democratic society.
    [Show full text]