DOCSLIB.ORG

Satcom for Net-Centric Warfare January/February 2011 Milsatmagazine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Satcom for Net-Centric Warfare January/February 2011 Milsatmagazine SatCom For Net-Centric Warfare January/February 2011 MilsatMagazine Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance Image: AEHF courtesy of Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman Ka-band Mounted Battle Command On-The-Move Photo courtesy of EM Solutions milsatmagazine pAYLOAD — Jan/feb 2011 Analysis: Military Communications — ..........04 About the cover image A Key Target For Satellite Services The U.S. Air Force’s Advanced Extremely High by Dustin Kaiser, Futron Frequency (AEHF) system is the nation’s nexgen INTEL: GEOINT + Satellite Data: ...................12 military strategic and tactical relay system, which Timely + Actionable will deliver survivable, protected communications by Marv Gordner, MorganFranklin to U.S. forces and selected allies worldwide. When fully operational, the system will consist of four Command Center: Joseph W. Trench............18 Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company crosslinked satellites, a ground mission control the editors center, and user terminals. The AEHF system provides joint, interoperable, assured connectivity Focus: A Software-Based Approach To ........28 for warfighters in operations in all levels of Airborne COTM Networking by Peter Carides, Tachyon Networks conflict — a capability not available through other planned military communication networks. Focus: Field Trials Of Mounted Battle ..........38 AEHF provides greater capacity and more Command Ka-Band SATCOM “On-The-Move” flexible coverage than its predecessor, Milstar, by Peter Woodhead, EM Solutions while assuring operational continuity through Chronicles: The Atlas Heritage ....................52 compatibility with the Milstar constellation. by Jos Heyman, Tiros Space Information Under contract to Lockheed Martin, the AEHF prime Focus: Long Distance Force Protection ........66 contractor and overall space system manager, by Rodger Von Kries, Tachyon Networks Northrop Grumman, builds and integrates the AEHF payload that consists of processors, antennas, radio frequency subsystems and crosslinks. The Command Center: Philip Harlow ..................72 XTAR, LLC payload delivers the new XDR (Extreme Data Rate) the editors communications services, providing data rates up to 8.192 Mbps per user, Milstar LDR (Low Data Dispatches .................................................80 Rate) services (75-2,400 bits per second), and the editors Milstar MDR (Medium Data Rate) services (4.8 Kbps-1.544 Mbps). AEHF delivers the flexible OPS: Adapting & Understanding ..................90 connectivity-on-demand needed to achieve 21st The Future Of War century objectives — swift, decisive outcomes by Col. Bruce Smith based on information dominance. On-orbit processing provides the flexibility needed to rapidly establish and reconfigure networks to meet dynamic command and control requirements. Electronically steerable antenna beams and flexible channel-to-beam mapping allow the delivery of capacity when it’s needed, where it’s needed. EHF frequencies, onboard digital processing, and highly directional antennas reduce the probability of jamming and intercept, assuring secure, reliable communications. Satellite crosslinks enable flexible global communications without the need for fixed site ground gateways. ANALYSIS Military Communications A Key Target For Satellite Services author: Dustin Kaiser, Senior Space Analyst, Futron Key Military Marketing Trends deployments, primarily by U.S. The strongest trends impacting defense forces, as well as use of military demand for commercial satellites to support Intelligence, satellite capacity over the next Surveillance and Reconnaissance decade include growing use of (ISR) activities, in particular those satellite capacity to support new carried out using a variety of types of warfighting, which are Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or increasingly dependent on broadband Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPAs). communications. Key among these are the expanded global troop 4 MILSATMAGAZINE — JANuAry/FEbruAry 2011 While commercial satellites have Futron’s forecast includes a full increasingly been used to meet these alternate view representing conversion requirements, there is still a bias in of demand into Mbps, with military ANALYSIS the military for specialized, proprietary demand in 2009 estimated at almost 16 capabilities, using military satellites. Gbps, growing to over 28Gbps in 2019. Given the range of uncertainty While the United States military and regarding development and deployment security forces represent the largest of new technologies, new regulations, buyer, demand from international security and new market solutions, Futron’s forces is anticipated to grow in aggregate forecasting includes projection of a terms as well as an overall percentage of series of possible future states, not demand. Fast followers, such as NATO just a single demand scenario, with allies and Israel, will continue to require the key variables summarized below. increased supply of commercial capacity. Other governments in the Middle East, Japan, Australia, and India will also likely require international commercial capacity. The geographic Futron’s assessment of demand demand requirements will include for commercial military satellite in-theater operations as military communications suggests that the communications are pushed lower into market is significantly larger than the warfighter ranks, as well as “home generally perceived, due to sizable country” demand tied to training, demand for classified operations backhaul, and redistribution of data. and agencies, as well as a rapidly Assumptions/Methodology increasing international customer base. While Futron’s forecast covers global Futron estimates the 2009 market military demand for commercial size for the military segment at 390 satellite communications capacity, TPEs for C-, Ku-, and Ka-bands, with it is estimated that U.S. military a baseline forecast for the addition of demand accounts for approximately almost 300 units through 2019, or 5.6 90 percent of global military demand percent annual growth over ten years. for commercial satellite services. MILSATMAGAZINE — JANuAry/FEbruAry 2011 5 The rate of growth in demand assessed across all frequency bands. for non-U.S. defense agencies is The results of this analysis are shown ANALYSIS expected to grow at a rate similar in the regional break-out below. to that of the U.S. military. While this year’s military forecast does The 2010 Futron ten year forecast not model demand for secure military of military demand for commercial communications such as those provided satellite communications is developed by the Paradigm/Skynet system, the based on a bottom up terminal forecast United States Advanced Extremely model. Within the model, demand High Frequency (AEHF) spacecraft, is analyzed separately amongst or military demand for commercial aerial, maritime, land mobile, and narrowband satellite communications, land fixed terminal programs. Futron has developed extensive data on this market, and it will be included Terminal demand is analyzed for in future forecasts. This forecast does, growth in total number of terminals, however, include X-Band capacity terminal throughput, terminal provided on a commercial basis, in spectrum usage, and overall terminal addition to C-, Ku-, and Ka-band. utilization levels within ten regions and the oceans. Demand is then Military Services Capacity: Baseline Demand Forecast by region 6 MILSATMAGAZINE — JANuAry/FEbruAry 2011 Drivers/Trends soldiers within the armed forces during repeated overseas deployments. Morale —U.S. + Allied Deployments support will likely become increasingly ANALYSIS important as the hyper connected The U.S. DoD’s FY 2011 budget outlines millennial generation constitutes an key structural changes that will increase increasingly larger percentage of demand for satellite communications the military. To help enable access through increases in targeted personnel to commercial bandwidth, the U.S. (e.g., Special Forces) as well the military is pushing for new military conversion of Army Multi-functional and Functional Support (MFF) brigades to a modular design with satellite capability driven down through the brigade to the company level. These are examples of strategic decisions driving military demand throughout the globe. In addition to satellite communications providing the medium for tactical and strategic force projection, satellite communications supports troop morale. Access to the Internet and the ability to stay in touch with friends and family is a capability that helps retain professional MILSATMAGAZINE — JANuAry/FEbruAry 2011 7 broadband terminals to be compatible systems are under development in the with commercial satellites. majority of militaries around the globe. ANALYSIS Naval forces are deployed for long In this connection, the U.S. military periods of time. The U.S. Navy in has indicated its intention to migrate particular projects military force from the current Ku-band to the use through the deployment of ships in of Ka-band to support its fleet of locations around the globe. These Global Hawk vehicles, and plans to ships currently have an average of deploy an upgraded Predator drone, 12 Mbps. U.S. Naval planners plan to designated the Gray Eagle, with increase through put to ship to 20-100 advanced communications capabilities Mbps during the forecast period. that will require up to 50 Mbps satellite communications throughput. —ISR Platforms —Wideband Global SATCOM Deployment Strong growth in UAV/RPA deployments, with associated growth The WGS constellation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company NASA SBIR Overview
    Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company NASA SBIR Overview and Engagement Craig Owens Program Manager, SBIR Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Space Systems Company Portfolio Special Strategic & Missile Defense Civil Space Programs NASA Human Adv Programs Strategic Missiles Missile Defense Planetary Weather & Exploration Exploration Environment Military Space Mission Solutions Protected Narrowband Navigation Weather Early Space End-to-End Geospatial Comms Comms Warning Protection Mission Systems Technologies Commercial Space Advanced Technology Center Subsidiaries Remote Commercial Wind Energy Optics, RF Adv. Materials Space Sciences Sensing SATCOM Management & Photonics & Nano Systems & Instruments LM SBIR Team Mission 1. Collaborate with small businesses to get advanced technology to our customers 2. Build strategic, long term relationships with small businesses by leveraging Gov’t SBIR/STTR R&D funding 3. Understand what small business technologies are potentially coming to the market 4. Align discriminating small business technologies to LM programs and future opportunities to reduce cost and win new business 5. Complement our small business supply chain and support the Gov’t initiative to leverage small businesses © 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation, All Rights Reserved LM SBIR Engagement • Strong engagement in the SBIR/STTR Program – Seeking technology maturation supporting program needs – 5-10 year outlook – TRL 6 needed for potential LM investment – Expect small businesses to be informed on LM • Benefits to LM – Innovation & Affordability – Strategic partnerships – Complements LM investments – Help drive innovation into next generation systems © 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation, All Rights Reserved LMSSC Endorsement Process • LM SME’s assess all concepts • Leadership aware of engagements • Process allows for relationship building © 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation, All Rights Reserved 5 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Lockheed Martin Space Advanced Programs
    Lockheed Martin Space Advanced Programs Requirements in NASA Science Missions © 2019 Lockheed Martin. All Rights Reserved Performance and Operational Measurement Requirements Emitted radiance Detect photons; Convert to e- Calibrate Data Science Data Quantized Photons Electrons Science Data Radiances § Orbit § Wavelength band § Detection § Science question § Signal photons § Integration time § Navigation analysis § Background scene § Quantum efficiency § Radiometric calibration § Field of View § Dark current § Resolution § Read noise § Solar intrusion Mission Requirements Performance Requirements • Duration • Environment • Electrical • Mechanical Iterate • Reliability • Operational • Thermal • Structural Evolve Requirements Constraints Resource Requirements • Spacecraft • Mass • Thermal interface • Power • Data rate • Launch vehicle • Size • Alignment Concept Design 2 Example Requirements Tree Implementing NASA Level 1s Institution/NASA Center Level 1 Reqts Program Level 2 Launch Environmental Mission Assurance Mission Reqts Doc Project Vehicle IRD Reqts Requirements (MAR) Flight System Level 3 Mission Ops & Element- Payload Spacecraft Flight to Ground Payload Reqts to SC ICDs Ground Developed, Requirements Doc ICD System Reqts Project Approved Payload/ Level 4 Spacecraft Ground Instrument Testbeds Element-Controlled Subsystems Subsystems Subsystems 3 Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) v Objective: Characterize Mars’ atmospheric escape v PI: Dr. Bruce Jakosky, CU LASP v Implementing Institution: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center v Spacecraft and Mission Ops: Lockheed Martin v Instruments: UCB SSL, CU/LASP, NASA GSFC, CNES v Mars relay: Jet Propulsion Laboratory v Launched November 18th 2013 v MOI September 22nd 2014 v Currently in third mission extension Image Credit: NASA/B. Ingalls 5 Science Missions Across the Solar System 6 © 2019 Lockheed Martin. All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • MSM Feb2020 Review2
    SATCOM for Net-Centric Warfare MilsatMagazineFebruary 2020 issue This issue... SMC: Year of Success Kratos: Countering Threats from Space Maxar: Leveraging Commercial Innovation WTA: Hacking the Hacker Dispatches United States Space Command Kratos Defense L3Harris Get SAT 2nd SOPS Orbit Communications Comtech EF Data Maxar Technologies Booz Allen Hamilton Raytheon Schriever AFB Cover image is courtesy of Kratos Defense and Security Cover SNIPE Ad Publishing Operations Features Silvano Payne, Publisher + Executive Writer Dispatches Simon Payne, Chief Technical Officer Hartley G. Lesser, Editorial Director United States Space Command .................................................................................4 Pattie Lesser, Executive Editor Kratos Defense & Security Solutions .........................................................................6 Donald McGee, Production Manager Andy Bernard, Sales Director L3Harris................................................................................................................7 + 9 Teresa Sanderson, Operations Director Get SAT .....................................................................................................................8 Sean Payne, Business Development Director Space & Missile Systems Center...............................................................................10 Dan Makinster, Technical Advisor 2nd SOPS .................................................................................................................11 Wendy Lewis, Contributing Editor
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified Unclassified
    UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2020 Air Force Date: February 2019 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System PE 1206433F / Wideband Global SATCOM (SPACE) Development & Demonstration (SDD) Prior FY 2020 FY 2020 FY 2020 Cost To Total COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 Base OCO Total FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 Complete Cost Total Program Element - 6.535 3.970 1.920 0.000 1.920 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.973 0.000 15.398 657102: Command & Control - 4.011 3.970 1.920 0.000 1.920 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.973 0.000 12.874 Sys-Consolidated (CCS-C) 657107: WGS Space Systems - 2.524 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.524 Resiliency Upgrade A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Military Satellite Communications (MILSATCOM) Command and Control System-Consolidated (CCS-C) system provides integrated launch and on-orbit command and control (C2) functionality at Schriever AFB and Vandenberg AFB for MILSATCOM satellites. Schriever AFB is used for primary operations and Vandenberg AFB is used for backup operations. CCS-C uses modified commercial off the shelf hardware/software to control emerging and legacy MILSATCOM systems including Milstar, Defense Satellite Communications System (DSCS), Wideband Global SATCOM (WGS) and Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) satellites. The CCS-C project 657102 funds system architecture evolution to provide increased performance for additional satellites and to comply with DoD, Air Force, and Air Force Space Command (AFSPC)-directed standards for Information Assurance, Satellite Control Standardization, and Net-Readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Centaur Dl-A Systems in a Nutshell
    NASA Technical Memorandum 88880 '5 t I Centaur Dl-A Systems in a Nutshell (NASA-TM-8888o) CElTAUR D1-A SYSTEBS IN A N87- 159 96 tiljTSBELL (NASA) 29 p CSCL 22D Andrew L. Gordan Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio January 1987 . CENTAUR D1-A SYSTEMS IN A NUTSHELL Andrew L. Gordan National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 SUMMARY This report identifies the unique aspects of the Centaur D1-A systems and subsystems. Centaur performance is described in terms of optimality (pro- pellant usage), flexibility, and airborne computer requirements. Major I-. systems are described narratively with some numerical data given where it may 03 CJ be useful. v, I W INTRODUCT ION The Centaur D1-A launch vehicle continues to be a key element in the Nation's space program. The Atlas/Centaur and Titan/Centaur combinations have boosted into orbit a variety of spacecraft on scientific, lunar, and planetary exploration missions and Earth orbit missions. These versatile, reliable, and accurate space booster systems will contribute to many significant space pro- grams well into the shuttle era. Centaur D1-A is the latest version of the Nation's first high-energy cryogenic launch vehicle. Major improvements in avionics and payload struc- ture have enhanced mission flexibility and mission success reliability. The liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen propellants and the pressurized stainless steel structure provide a top-performance vehicle. Centaur's primary thrust comes from two Pratt 8, Whitney constant- thrust, turbopump-fed, regeneratively cooled, liquid-fueled rocket engines. Each RL10A-3-3a engine can generate 16 500 lb of thrust, for a total thrust of 33 000 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Tsoi Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company University of Colorado Boulder (M.S
    5 Years Later Shades of Blue Andrew Tsoi Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company University of Colorado Boulder (M.S. 2014) Heritage High School (Class of 2008) A LITTLE ABOUT ME › Born June 11th 1990 in Englewood CO › K-12 (Littleton Public Schools) – Runyon Elementary – Powell Middle School – Heritage High School › Clubs and Activities – Littleton Rotary/Interact Club – Destination Imagination – Club Inline Hockey – Varsity Lacrosse – Yearbook (Sports Editor) – National Honor Society MR. WARREN › Math teacher at Heritage H.S. – Advanced Algebra and Calculus › Key Lessons – “Use your imagination” – “Be creative” – “Think outside the box” › I chose to major in aerospace engineering my senior year THE LAST FIVE YEARS › University of Colorado at Boulder › Bachelors in Aerospace Engineering Sciences (ASEN) in May 2013 › Masters in ASEN/Structures and Materials in May 2014 • Clubs and Activities • Student Leadership Council • Student Success Center • Men’s Club Lacrosse • Zeta Beta Tau Fraternity WHAT IS ENGINEERING? SCIENCE IS THE WHAT/WHY ENGINEERING IS THE HOW Karman vortex sheet: repeating swirling vortices Boundary layer injection: injecting fluid into the caused by unsteady separation of flow of a fluid airstream to create turbulence such that more lift around blunt bodies. is generated along the wing. More lift means less fuel. Less fuel means more efficient airplanes. AEROSPACE ENGINEERING IS A BROAD FIELD AERONAUTICS ASTRODYNAMICS LAUNCH VEHICLES • Aircraft technologies • Spacecraft • Space Shuttle • Military and civilian technologies
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Military Satellites
    The Market for Military Satellites Product Code #F678 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Space Systems Forecast - Satellites & Spacecraft Analysis 3 The Market for Military Satellites 2010 - 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................3 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Competitive Environment.....................................................................................................................................13 Market Statistics .....................................................................................................................................................14 Table 1 - The Market for Military Satellites Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019 ................................................16 Table 2 - The Market for Military Satellites Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019.................................................19 Figure 1 - The Market for Military Satellites Unit Production 2010 - 2019 (Bar Graph) ...............................................................................22 Figure 2
    [Show full text]
  • Quest: the History of Spaceflight Quarterly
    Celebrating the Silver Anniversary of Quest: The History of Spaceflight Quarterly 1992 - 2017 www.spacehistory101.com Celebrating the Silver Anniversary of Quest: The History of Spaceflight Quarterly Since 1992, 4XHVW7KH+LVWRU\RI6SDFHIOLJKW has collected, documented, and captured the history of the space. An award-winning publication that is the oldest peer reviewed journal dedicated exclusively to this topic, 4XHVW fills a vital need²ZKLFKLVZK\VRPDQ\ SHRSOHKDYHYROXQWHHUHGRYHUWKH\HDUV Astronaut Michael Collins once described Quest, its amazing how you are able to provide such detailed content while making it very readable. Written by professional historians, enthusiasts, stu- dents, and people who’ve worked in the field 4XHVW features the people, programs, politics that made the journey into space possible²human spaceflight, robotic exploration, military programs, international activities, and commercial ventures. What follows is a history of 4XHVW, written by the editors and publishers who over the past 25 years have worked with professional historians, enthusiasts, students, and people who worked in the field to capture a wealth of stories and information related to human spaceflight, robotic exploration, military programs, international activities, and commercial ventures. Glen Swanson Founder, Editor, Volume 1-6 Stephen Johnson Editor, Volume 7-12 David Arnold Editor, Volume 13-22 Christopher Gainor Editor, Volume 23-25+ Scott Sacknoff Publisher, Volume 7-25 (c) 2019 The Space 3.0 Foundation The Silver Anniversary of Quest 1 www.spacehistory101.com F EATURE: THE S ILVER A NNIVERSARY OF Q UEST From Countdown to Liftoff —The History of Quest Part I—Beginnings through the University of North Dakota Acquisition 1988-1998 By Glen E.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Paths of Heaven the Emergence of Space Power Thought
    Beyond the Paths of Heaven The Emergence of Space Power Thought A Comprehensive Anthology of Space-Related Master’s Research Produced by the School of Advanced Airpower Studies Edited by Bruce M. DeBlois, Colonel, USAF Professor of Air and Space Technology Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama September 1999 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Beyond the paths of heaven : the emergence of space power thought : a comprehensive anthology of space-related master’s research / edited by Bruce M. DeBlois. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Astronautics, Military. 2. Astronautics, Military—United States. 3. Space Warfare. 4. Air University (U.S.). Air Command and Staff College. School of Advanced Airpower Studies- -Dissertations. I. Deblois, Bruce M., 1957- UG1520.B48 1999 99-35729 358’ .8—dc21 CIP ISBN 1-58566-067-1 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii OVERVIEW . ix PART I Space Organization, Doctrine, and Architecture 1 An Aerospace Strategy for an Aerospace Nation . 3 Stephen E. Wright 2 After the Gulf War: Balancing Space Power’s Development . 63 Frank Gallegos 3 Blueprints for the Future: Comparing National Security Space Architectures . 103 Christian C. Daehnick PART II Sanctuary/Survivability Perspectives 4 Safe Heavens: Military Strategy and Space Sanctuary . 185 David W. Ziegler PART III Space Control Perspectives 5 Counterspace Operations for Information Dominance .
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012 February 2013 About FAA About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2013) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Dear Colleague, 2012 was a very active year for the entire commercial space industry. In addition to all of the dramatic space transportation events, including the first-ever commercial mission flown to and from the International Space Station, the year was also a very busy one from the government’s perspective. It is clear that the level and pace of activity is beginning to increase significantly.
    [Show full text]