DOCSLIB.ORG

Cartmill Crossings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cartmill Crossings DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF TULARE CARTMILL CROSSINGS JUNE 2019 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROJECT TITLE: Cartmill Crossings Draft Environmental Impact Report LEAD AGENCY: City of Tulare OVERVIEW: Notice is hereby given that City of Tulare is seeking written comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) (SCH# 2018111038) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This notice has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15085 and 15087(c), which requires public notification of availability of a Draft EIR. PROJECT LOCATION: Cartmill Crossings is a 127-acre land development project proposed to be constructed in an area immediately north and adjacent to the City of Tulare, California. Tulare is in the heart of California’s Central Valley, eight miles south of Visalia and 60 miles north of Bakersfield. The Project site is in the northeast corner of the State Route (SR) 99/Cartmill Avenue interchange and bounded by SR 99 to the west and Cartmill Avenue to the south. The Project site is within the United States Geological Survey (USGS), Visalia quadrangle in Section 26, Township 19S, Range 19E, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (MDBM). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Project is the construction of a multi-use commercial and residential development. Approximately 68.6 acres of commercial businesses on both sides of Akers Street will be developed in accordance with the permitted uses of the C-3 zone district. Examples of permitted uses include restaurants, fast food restaurants, retail stores, hotels, and fuel stations. The northeastern portion of the Project site will consist of approximately 30 acres of low- density, single-family residential homes with lots no smaller than 6,000 square feet. West of the low-density residential development will be approximately 4.4 acres of medium-density residential development, which will likely consist of fourplex residences. Southeast of the medium-density area will be approximately 7.7 acres of high-density, multi-family development, which will likely consist of an apartment complex. Northeast of the multi-family development will be a seven-acre park. A detailed and complete description of Cartmill Crossings, analyzed in this Draft EIR, is presented in Chapter 2, Project Description. The proposed development has the following characteristics: • 120-acre site; • 68.6 acres of commercial development; • 30 acres of low-density residential development; • 4.4 acres of medium-density residential development; • 7.7 acres of high-density residential development; • Seven acres of parkland; and • Additions of new sewer and water lines. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: CEQA Guidelines Section 15087 (c)(4) requires that the Notice of Availability list the significant environmental effects anticipated as a result of the Project. The Draft EIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts in the following areas: Agricultural and Forestry Resources – involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. This is a significant and unavoidable impact. Public Services and Utilities – require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: June 17, 2019 through August 1, 2019 ADDRESS WHERE COPY OF DRAFT EIR IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: City of Tulare Community and Economic Development Department, 411 East Kern Ave., Tulare, CA and Tulare Public Library, 475 North M Street, Tulare, CA. WEBSITE WHERE DRAFT EIR CAN BE FOUND FOR REVIEW: https://www.tulare.ca.gov/departments/community-development/development-services Written comments concerning the Draft EIR are due by 5:00 p.m., August 1, 2019 and should be submitted to: Mario Anaya, Principal Planner 411 East Kern Street Tulare, CA 93274 PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS: CEQA Guidelines Section 15087 describes the public review procedures for a Draft EIR. The Draft EIR will be subject to public review and comment for a period of at least 45 days. The City of Tulare requests that reviewers submit comments on the Draft EIR consistent with the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15087. According to Section 15202 of the CEQA Guidelines, CEQA does not require formal hearings at any stage of the environmental review process; however, it is typical to consider the EIR and its findings during public hearings required for the associated project. For additional information, please contact Mario Anaya at (559) 684-4223 or manaya@ tulare.ca.gov. 1. PrintForm Appendix C Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal Mail to: State Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 For Hand Delivery/StreetAddress: 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 SCH #2018111038 Project Title: Cartmill Crossings Lead Agency: City of Tulare Contact Person: Mario Anaya, Principal Planner Mailing Address: 411 East Kern Street Phone: (559) 684-4223 City: Tulare Zip: 93274 County: ---------Tulare ------ Project Location: County:Tulare------------- City/Nearest Community: Tulare---------------- Cross Streets: SR 99/CartmillAvenue Zip Code: _93_2_7_4__ _ 0 0 Longitude/Latitude (degrees, minutes and seconds): � __!±__'...J.L"N / _l!.2_ .1Q__'_;r]__"W Total Acres:-- 120 ------ Assessor's Parcel No.: 149-220-003-000 Section: 26 Twp.: 19S Range: 19E Base: MDBM Within 2 Miles: State Hwy#: SR 99 Waterways: --N/A ------------------- Airports: N/A Railways: Union Pacific Railroad Schools: Los Tules, Liberty, Missie Document Type: CEQA: □ NOP I&] Draft EIR NEPA: □ NOi Other: □ Joint Document D Early Cons D Supplement/Subsequent EIR □ EA □ Final Document D Neg Dec (Prior SCH No.) ______ □ Draft EIS □ Other: D Mit Neg Dec Other: ---------- □ FONSI --- ------------ Local Action Type: D General Plan Update D Specific Plan □ Rezone I&] Annexation � General Plan Amendment D Master Plan � Prezone □ Redevelopment D General Plan Element D Planned Unit Development □ Use Permit □ Coastal Permit D Community Plan D Site Plan □ Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) □ Other: Development Type: I&] Residential: Units Acres� D Office: Sq.ft. =====Acres Employees__ _ D Transportation: Type ______________ I&] Commercial:Sq.ft. Acres 69 Employees ___ D Mining: Mineral____________ _ D Industrial: Sq.ft. --­ Acres Employees__ _ D Power: Type ------- MW------ D Educational: -=-----,--------------- □ Waste Treatment:Type MGD ----- !&] Recreational:-- 7-acre- park'--- ------------- □ Hazardous Waste:Type -------------- □ Water Facilities:Type _______ MGD ----- □ Other: ___________________ Project Issues Discussed in Document: � AestheticNisual D Fiscal I&] Recreation/Parks [ZI Vegetation � Agricultural Land D Flood Plain/Flooding � Schools/Universities I&]Water Quality I&] Air Quality D Forest Land/Fire Hazard D Septic Systems [x]Water Supply/Groundwater � Archeological/Historical I&] Geologic/Seismic IX] Sewer Capacity D Wetland/Riparian I&] Biological Resources D Minerals Ix] Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading � Growth Inducement D Coastal Zone I&] Noise [xl Solid Waste I&] Land Use D Drainage/Absorption I&]Population/Housing Balance � Toxic/Hazardous [xl Cumulative Effects D Economic/Jobs I&] Public Services/Facilities I&] Traffic/Circulation D Other:--- ---- Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Designation: tg!lc�t�e_wi!,hi] th,e §xs.!u�v� �ri,£u!1,uril �2Q)z,2 n� d�ti:Lct______ _ Project Description: (please use a separate page if necessary) The proposed Project is the construction ofa multi-use commercial and residential development. Approximately 68.6 acres of commercial businesses on both sides ofAkers Street will be developed in accordance with the permitted uses of the G3 zone district. The northeaster portion ofthe Project site will consist of approximately 30 acres of\ow-density, single-family residential homes with lots no smaller than 6,000 sq. ft. West of the low­ density residential development will be approximately 4.4 acres ofmedium-density residential development, which will likely consists offourplex residences. Southeast of the medium-density area will be approximately 7.7 acres ofhigh-density, multi-family development, which will likely consist ofan apartment complex. Northeast of the multi-family development will be a seven-acre park. Revised 20 I 0 Reviewing Agencies Checklist Lead Agencies may recommend State Clearinghouse distribution by marking agencies below with and "X". If you have already sent your document to the agency please denote that with an "S". X Air Resources Board Office of Historic Preservation Boating & Waterways, Department of Office of Public School Construction California Emergency Management Agency __ Parks & Recreation, Department of -- CaliforniaHighway Patrol __ Pesticide Regulation, Department of x Caltrans District #6 Public Utilities Commission Caltrans Division of Aeronautics X Regional WQCB #_5 __ Caltrans Planning __ Resources Agency Central Valley Flood Protection Board Resources Recycling and Recovery, Department of __ Coachella Valley Mtns. Conservancy __ S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Comm. Coastal Commission __ San Gabriel & Lower L.A. Rivers & Mtns. Conservancy Colorado River Board __ San Joaquin River Conservancy X Conservation, Department of Santa Monica Mtns. Conservancy Corrections, Department of State Lands Commission Delta Protection Commission
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    NPSForm10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number Page SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 99001263 Date Listed: 10/20/99 Tehachapi Railroad Depot Kern CA Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. / Signature^of Me Keeper Date of Action Amended Items in Nomination: Significance: The nomination incorrectly refers to the nearby Tehachapi "Loop" as a National Historic Landmark [8.1]. This information was confirmed with the California SHPO. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM L. This form is for use in nominating or requesting c^ete: individual properties and districts. See instructions in the National Register of Historic Places Registral Register Bulletin 16A) . Complete each item by marking Tl x""™ii appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tehachapi News Presents
    The Tehachapi News presents IST OUR H ORY A Fourth of July parade, circa 1890, is seen here proceeding north along Curry Street. The building with the peaked roof is seen on the present-day location of the Talmarc Building. COURTESY TEHACHAPI HERITAGE LEAGUE A collection of historic photos, stories and personal memories of how Tehachapi became the community it is today. EarlyEarly settlers,settlers, PagesPages 2-32-3 City’sCity’s pathpath toto successsuccess followedfollowed ImpactImpact ofof thethe thethe railroad,railroad, 19521952 earthquake,earthquake, PagesPages 6-76-7 COURTESY OF THE TEHACHAPI HERITAGE LEAGUE PagesPages 8-98-9 John Brite erected the area’s first sawmill COURTESY OF KELCY’S CAFE ALEX HORVATH / THE CALIFORNIAN in 1860 in a canyon just south of his ranch The 1952 earthquake devastated Tehachapi’s commercial house (from the book “Images of America A BNSF freight train starts a slow trek around the Tehachapi district. TEHACHAPI,” by Gloria Hine Gossard). Loop, Oct. 23, 2018. A look at our history TEHACHAPI NEWS Today, Tehachapi News quake, our old cemeter- We’re often looking at takes a step back in time ies, the people who have what’s next — When do with this special history lived here for decades we have to drop the kids section. and more. off at school or shuttle We tapped local his- There’s something here them to their next ath- torians and our staff to to surprise and delight letic event? What’s for present key dates in local even those who are well- dinner? What preparation history. We’re taking a versed in local history.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Fe in Grapevine Canyon? an 1890 Plan to Enter Northern California Via Fort Tejon by Jack W.Kelly
    Santa Fe in Grapevine Canyon? An 1890 Plan to Enter Northern California via Fort Tejon By Jack W.Kelly he many stories about Santa Fe's on February 26, 1895. Construction south ation and by June, 1898 the 80.40 miles to efforts to achieve access to the Pa­ from Stockton commenced later that year Bakersfield had accomplished the creation T cific Ocean and Southern Pacific's and over 25 miles of track were in place of a competing railroad through the valley. strident efforts to deny Santa Fe that ac­ by December. By August 1896 the 123.44 The investors and shippers who owned cess have been told with so many different miles to Fresno were completed; by June, the SF&SJV Railway were not, and did not interpretations that, depending upon ones 1897 30.20 miles to Hanford were in oper- wish to be, railroad operators. Their rail- bias or loyalties, one may reach conflicting conclusions. However, there seems to be little disagreement about Southern Pacific's stranglehold on the San Joaquin Valley and the efforts of its captive customers to relieve themselves from "The Octopus," which held them captive. The recent (197 4) and perhaps most complete analysis of the Santa Fe is History ofthe Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company by Keith L. Bryant, Jr. Mr. Bry­ ant, a history professor, was given access to the files and corporate records of the Santa Fe. Beginning on page 173 he describes the frustrations of these captive customers and their decision to form The San Fran­ cisco Traffic Association in about 1891.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Deserts: an Ecological Rediscovery
    3Pavlik-Ch1 10/9/07 6:43 PM Page 15 Rediscovery Copyrighted Material 3Pavlik-Ch1 10/9/07 6:43 PM Page 16 Copyrighted Material 3Pavlik-Ch1 10/9/07 6:43 PM Page 17 Indians first observed the organisms, processes, and history of California deserts. Over millennia, native people obtained knowledge both practical and esoteric, necessitated by survival in a land of extremes and accumulated by active minds recording how nature worked. Such knowledge became tradition when passed across generations, allowing cul- tural adjustments to the changing environment. The depth and breadth of their under- standing can only be glimpsed or imagined, but should never be minimized. Indians lived within deserts, were born, fed, and raised on them, su¤ered the extremes and uncertainties, and passed into the ancient, stony soils. Theirs was a discovery so intimate and spiritual, so singular, that we can only commemorate it with our own 10,000-year-long rediscov- ery of this place and all of its remarkable inhabitants. Our rediscovery has only begun. Our rediscovery is not based upon living in the deserts, despite a current human pop- ulation of over one million who dwelling east of the Sierra. We do not exist within the ecological context of the land. We are not dependant upon food webs of native plants and [Plate 13] Aha Macav, the Mojave people, depicted in 1853. (H. B. Molhausen) REDISCOVERY • 17 Copyrighted Material 3Pavlik-Ch1 10/9/07 6:43 PM Page 18 Gárces 1776 Kawaiisu Tribal groups Mono Mono Tribe Lake Aviwatha Indian place name Paiute Inyo Owens Valley
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 124/Friday, June 26, 2020
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 124 / Friday, June 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules 38345 Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY among other things, prohibit consumer regulatory action. deception and the use of misleading Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade statements on labels and ensure that List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Bureau labels provide the consumer with Airspace, Incorporation by reference, adequate information as to the identity 27 CFR Part 9 Navigation (air). and quality of the product. The Alcohol [Docket No. TTB–2020–0006; Notice No. and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau The Proposed Amendment 191] (TTB) administers the FAA Act pursuant to section 1111(d) of the In consideration of the foregoing, the RIN 1513–AC69 Homeland Security Act of 2002, Federal Aviation Administration codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as Proposed Establishment of the Tehachapi Mountains Viticultural Area Secretary has delegated the functions follows: and duties in the administration and AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and enforcement of these provisions to the PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, Trade Bureau, Treasury. TTB Administrator through Treasury B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. Order 120–01, dated December 10, 2013 TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND (superseding Treasury Order 120–01, REPORTING POINTS SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax dated January 24, 2003). and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR ■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 establish the approximately 58,000-acre part 4) authorizes TTB to establish continues to read as follows: ‘‘Tehachapi Mountains’’ viticultural definitive viticultural areas and regulate Authority: 49 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Context and Methodology for Evaluating Trails, Roads, and Highways in California
    A Historical Context and Methodology for Evaluating Trails, Roads, and Highways in California Prepared by The California Department of Transportation Sacramento, California ® ® © 2016 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved. Cover photography provided Caltrans Headquarters Library. Healdsburg Wheelmen photograph courtesy of the Healdsburg Museum. For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats upon request. Please call: (916) 653-0647 Voice, or use the CA Relay Service TTY number 1-800-735-2929 Or write: Chief, Cultural Studies Office Caltrans, Division of Environmental Analysis P.O. Box 942874, MS 27 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 A HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS IN CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Cultural Studies Office Division of Environmental Analysis California Department of Transportation Sacramento 2016 © 2016 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved. OTHER THEMATIC STUDIES BY CALTRANS Water Conveyance Systems in California, Historic Context Development and Evaluation Procedures (2000) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Agricultural Properties in California (2007) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Mining Properties in California (2008) A Historical Context and Archeological Research Design for Townsite Properties in California (2010) Tract Housing In California, 1945–1973: A Context for National Register Evaluation (2013) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Work Camp Properties in California (2013) MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) prepared this study in response to the need for a cohesive and comprehensive examination of trails, roads, and highways in California, and with a methodological approach for evaluating these types of properties for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA: Rising Tree
    CALIFORNIA: Rising Tree Rising Tree Wind Farm consists of three phases and is located in Kern County, approximately three miles west of the town of Mojave. The wind farm is within the Tehachapi Wind Resource Area, the same site as a few of the earliest wind farms in the United States. Local winds are fueled by cooler air from the San Joaquin Valley rushing through Tehachapi Pass to fill low pressure voids caused by heating in the Mojave Desert. 198 MW ONLINE SINCE 2014 Rising Tree Wind Farm produces enough electricity to power more than 92,000 California homes.1 Economic Benefits Rising Tree represents Approximately $17.5 million More than $34.7 million a capital investment in cumulative payments to paid to local landowners of approximately $336 million.2 local governments through 2019.3 through 2019. Created 139 full-time equivalent Southern California Edison and jobs during construction and $55.1 million spent within Pacific Gas and Electric 13 permanent jobs during 50 miles of the wind farm purchase energy the life of the project.4 through 2019.5 from Rising Tree.6 Turbine Technology Rising Tree Wind Farm saves more than 352 million gallons of water each year.7 Rising Tree I Wind Farm consists of 24 Vestas V112 3.3 MW wind turbines, Rising Tree II Wind Farm consists of 6 Vestas V112 3.3 MW wind turbines, and Rising Tree III Wind Farm consists of 30 Vestas V112 3.3 MW wind turbines. About Us EDP Renewables North America LLC (EDPR NA) and Rising Tree Wind Farm its subsidiaries develop, construct, own, and operate is compatible with other wind farms and solar parks throughout North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Monitoring and Risk Assessment at Tehachapi Pass and San Gorgonio Pass Wind Resource Areas, California: Phase 1 Preliminary Results
    Avian Monitoring and Risk Assessment at Tehachapi Pass and San Gorgonio Pass Wind Resource Areas, California: Phase 1 Preliminary Results by Richard L. Anderson1, Dale Strickland2, Judith Tom1, Natasha Neumann1, Wallace Erickson2, John Cleckler1, Gabriel Mayorga1, Ginger Nuhn1, Andie Leuders1, Julie Schneider1, Leslie Backus1, Paula Becker2 and Neil Flagg3 1 California Energy Commission 2 Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 3 Pacific Southwest Research Station Introduction Awareness of avian fatalities at large scale wind energy developments first emerged in the late 1980s at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area (WRA) in Central California, U.S.A. Observations of dead raptors at the Altamont Pass WRA (Anderson and Estep 1988; Estep 1989) triggered concern on the part of regulatory agencies, environmental/conservation groups, resource agencies, and the wind and electric utility industries. In addition to the results from the Altamont Pass WRA, other studies and observations have also established that birds die as a result of collisions with wind turbines and related facilities within wind plants. Although fatalities of many bird species have been documented, raptors have received the most attention in California and also in Spain (Anderson and Estep 1988; Estep 1989; Howell and Noone 1992; Orloff and Flannery 1992; Hunt 1994; Luke and Watts 1994; Howell 1995; Martí 1995; Janss, this volume). Other WRA studies have documented deaths of songbirds (Orloff and Flannery 1992; Pearson 1992; Higgins et al. 1995; Winkelman 1995), water birds (Pearson 1992; Winkelman 1995), and bats (Higgins et al. 1995). Generally, these “other birds” have been common species in those areas, not subject to the degree of concern associated with raptor fatalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoshonean Dialects of California
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY Vol. 4 No. 3 SHOSHONEAN DIALECTS OF CALIFORNIA BY A. L. KROEBER BERKELEY THE UNIVERSITY PRESS FEBRUARY, 1907 UNIVERSITY oOF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS .DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY The following publications dealing with archaeological and ethnol- ogical subjects issued under the direction of the Department of Anthrop- ology are sent in exchange for the publications of anthropological depart- ments and museums, for journals devoted to general anthropology or to archaeology and ethnology, and for specimens contributed to the museum collections of the University. They are for sale at the prices stated, which include postage or express charges. Exchanges should be directed to The Exchange Department, University Library, Berkeley, California, U. S. A. All orders and remittances should be addressed to the University Press. AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGk. (Octavo). Vol. 1. No. 1. Life and Culture of the Hupa, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pages 88, Plates 30, September, 1903 . Price, $1.25 No. 2. Hupa Texts, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pages 290, March, 1904. Price, 3.00 Vol. 2. No. 1. The Exploration of the Potter Creek Cave, by William J. Sinclair. Pages 27, Plates 14, April, 1904 . Price, .40 No. 2. The Languages of the Coast of California South of San Francisco, by A. L. Kroeber. Pages 52, June, 1904. Price, .60 No. 3. Types of Indian Culture in California, by A. L. Kroeber. Pages 22, June, 1904. .Price, .25 No. 4. Basket Designs of the Indians of Northwestern California, by A. L. Kroeber. Pages 60, Plates 7, January, 1905. Price, .75 No. 5. The Yokuts Language of South Central California, by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Alta East Wind Project Eagle Conservation Plan
    Attachment 1 Final Environmental Assessment Alta East Wind Project Eagle Conservation Plan U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Final Environmental Assessment Alta East Wind Project Eagle Conservation Plan California Docket Number FWS-R8-MB-2015-N183 FF08M00000-FXMB12310800000-145 Prepared by: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region Migratory Birds and Habitats 2800 Cottage Way, W-2650 Sacramento, CA 95825 Contact: Heather Beeler, Eagle Permit Coordinator 916-414-6651 September 2016 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Contents Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. vii 1 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ................................................................................................. 1-6 1.4 Regulatory Setting, Authorities, and Guidance ..................................................................... 1-6 1.4.1 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ...................................................................... 1-6 1.4.2 Migratory Bird Treaty Act ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Chumash
    Interior Chumash MADISON S. BEELER KATHRYN A. KLAR N this article we pubUsh two Chumash study will use material from aU three of these Ivocabularies representing the speech of men in an attempt to clarify the Hnguistic groups who Hved away from the coast together situation in a corner of California as it existed with analysis and commentary; no pubh- perhaps a century ago. cations ofthe Chumash speech of these regions C. Hart Merriam (1855-1942) was in his have hitherto been made. The word-lists wiU earher life a professional biologist and acted considerably change the traditional picture of for many years as chief of the Biological speech distributions in these interior regions. Survey of the United States Department of Although we owe both ofthe vocabularies here Agriculture. Later his interests changed, and in printed to the work of C. Hart Merriam, their 1910 he left government service and came to interpretation requires us to use materials Hve in California, devoting himself to the drawn from the researches of A.L. Kroeber collecting of ethnological and linguistic data and John P. Harrington. All three of these men from elderly survivors ofthe numerous Indian were diUigent tillers of the fecund vineyard of tribes he found aU over the state and in California aboriginal languages, and they were neighboring parts of Nevada and Arizona. aU working contemporaneously, in the first Most of this material assembled in the field and two decades ofthe twentieth century. But there in supplementary work in archives was de­ was practically no communication among posited with the Department of Anthropology, them.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Transmission System Ethnographic and Historical Resources
    Allen-Warner Valley Energy System: Western Transmission System Ethnographic and Historical Resources Item Type Report Authors Bean, Lowell Bean; Evans, Michael J.; Hopa, Ngapare K.; Massey, Lee Gooding; Rothenberg, Diane; Stoffle, Richard W.; Vane, Sylvia Brakke; Weinman-Roberts, Lois; Young, Jackson Publisher Cultural Systems Research, Incorporated Download date 10/10/2021 06:50:38 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/276213 ALLENALLEN-l-1ARNER - WARNER VALLEYVALLEY ENERGYENERGY SYSTEM:SYSTEM: WESTERNWESTERN TRANSMISSIONTRANSMISSION SYSTEMSYSTEH ETHNOGRAPHICETHNOGRAPHIC ANDAND HISTORICALHISTORICAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Report SubmittedSubmitted byby CULTURAL SYSTEMSSYSTEMS RESEARCH, INCORPORATEDINCORPORATED to SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Contributing Scholars:Scholars: Submitting Officers andand Editors: Lowell JohnJohn Bean,Bean, Ph.D.Ph.D. Michael J.J. Evans,Evans, M.A.M.A. Lowell JohnJohn Bean,Bean, Ph.D.Ph.D. Ngapare K.K. Hopa,Hopa, Ph.D.Ph.D. President, CSRICSRI Lee GoodingGooding Massey,Massey, B.A.B.A. Diane Rothenberg,Rothenberg, Ph.D.Ph.D. Sylvia Brakke Vane,Vane, M.A.M.A. Richard W.W. Stoffle,Stoffle, Ph.D.Ph.D. Vice President, CSRICSRI Sylvia BrakkeBrakke Vane,Vane, M.A.M.A. Lois Weinman-Weinman-Roberts, Roberts, Ph.D.Ph.D. Jackson Young,Young, B.A.B.A. Menlo Park, California December 15, 19791979 This materialmaterial is copyrighted by Southern California Edison Company,Company, Rosemead, California.California. Permission must bebe obtained,obtained, inin writing,writing, to copy or reproduce this materialmaterial inin anyany wayway whatsoever.whatsoever. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Management SummarySUIIlDlary M-1 Acknowledgements '. i eSRICSRI Staff o•••••••••••••••••••••••• ii List of TablesTables iii List of Maps v List of Maps .•............................................ CHAPTER I.I.
    [Show full text]