DOCSLIB.ORG

Feminist Ethics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feminist Ethics CHAPTER 8 Feminist Ethics Sarah Clark Miller Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Pennsylvania State University, State College Imagine a world in which women are forbidden from holding property or jobs and even from reading. In this world, women are taught that the order of things entails their utter subservience to men. It is a world in which women’s freedom is so circumscribed that they are forced to bear children against their will. This is the world that Margaret Atwood (1939–) portrays in The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), a novel set in the Republic of Gilead, a repressive theocracy that takes hold in the United States after a governmental coup. This is a world in which women’s oppression—and their reduction to nothing more than their reproductive function—is complete. In Gilead, rich, White, able-bodied men determine the meaning and shape of all women’s lives. They do so in large part by controlling the A promotion for the Hulu series based on Margaret Atwood’s novel The Handmaid’s Tale. The novel’s narrator says the bonnets the handmaids wear “are to keep us from seeing, but also from being seen.” REUTERS/ALAMY STOCK PHOTO. 189 COPYRIGHT 2017 Macmillan Reference USA, a part of Gale, a Cengage Company WCN 02-200-210 Chapter 8: Feminist Ethics ethical codes that govern the lives over which they rule. In its depiction of patriarchy unchecked and misogyny unbounded, The Handmaid’sTaleserves as a potent reminder of why we need ethical theories and practices with the elimination of oppression against women at their core. It also shows us why we need ethical systems that value women in all their diversity, as well as systems that promote women’s right to determine for themselves the meaning of their own lives. Although The Handmaid’s Tale is a work of fiction, it bears a striking resemblance to reality. Atwood has noted that there is “nothing in the book that didn’t happen, somewhere” (Heching 2017). Thus, it is not that it could happen but rather that, piecemeal, all elements of it already have. This is all the more reason why attention to varieties of ethics with the power not only to identify errors of the past but to prevent horrors of the future is vital. Feminist ethics is one such form of ethics. Gilead is the world to which feminist ethics is the antidote and against which it guards. In short, The Handmaid’s Tale shows us why we need feminist ethics. This chapter begins by discussing what feminist ethics is and does through examination of a specific example of the spheres into which our lives are separated: the public and the private. After demonstrating how feminist ethicists critique, complicate, and expand the content and experiences of such categories, I characterize the overarching aims of feminist ethics as (1) critical and (2) creative. I then turn to major themes in feminist ethics, exploring four of them in depth: oppression, vulnerability and dependency, relationality, and the nonideal. Having provided an overview of the ethical themes that matter to feminists, I also depict three different varieties of feminist ethics—liberal, care, and transnational—before concluding. WHAT IS FEMINIST ETHICS? Feminist ethics invites us to imagine an ethical life beyond the rigid confines erected by ethicists throughout the history of ethics. Ethics has been an enterprise written nearly exclusively by men, for men, and about men. Even when purporting to be universal in scope, much of Western ethics has been falsely so. Though ethicists wrote of humanity, only the middle part of that word—man—was their real focus. Western ethics has believed that, as James Brown put it in a 1966 song, “this is a man’s, man’s, man’s world.” Feminist ethics arrives on the scene to complete this lyric: “But it wouldn’t be nothing, nothing without a woman or a girl” (though feminists might intend this lyric in a more empowering way than the Godfather of Soul likely meant it). The content, feel, and focus of ethical life shifts under feminist critique and revision as feminists push the boundaries of the “proper” subject matter of ethics. They explore issues and themes not previously taken to be part of moral philosophy, such as child rearing, domestic violence, and sex work. Feminist ethicists have expanded not only the content of ethics but also how it might be done. Instead of seeing ethics as a process of consulting imagined, ideal situations to determine which principles work in such perfect contexts, feminist ethicists point to the importance of beginning ethical inquiry from real life, in all its imperfection and messiness. And finally, a point that is perhaps not acknowledged often enough: feminist ethicists have challenged the very notion of who gets to be an ethicist in the first place. Although the profession was for centuries forbidden to the fairer sex and reserved nearly exclusively for their less fair counterparts, philosophy in general and philosophical ethics in particular are now, finally, open to women. 190 MACMILLAN INTERDISCIPLINARY HANDBOOKS COPYRIGHT 2017 Macmillan Reference USA, a part of Gale, a Cengage Company WCN 02-200-210 Chapter 8: Feminist Ethics WHAT FEMINIST ETHICS IS AND WHAT IT DOES: AN OPENING EXAMPLE Consider an example that is handy for the way in which it demonstrates all three foregoing, interwoven points about the forms of expansion feminist ethics initiates (i.e., expansion of the content of ethics, how ethics is done, and those who are deemed appropriate to be ethicists): the public/private split. This is the split thought to exist between the public sphere of commerce and politics and the private sphere of family and home. Historically, the private sphere was the place of women, while the public sphere was the rightful place of men. Social evidence of this split exists throughout US history. Challenging the Public/Private Divide. Take, for example, the White, suburban culture of the late 1950s and early 1960s, as exemplified in the popular television series Leave It to Beaver (1957–1963), where June Cleaver, a wife and mother, tended to the home and the raising of two sons, while her husband, Ward Cleaver, worked outside the home in an unspecified white-collar office job (though his questionable past as a philosophy major must also be noted). Traditionally speaking, what happened in the private sphere was just that— private, and therefore often beyond the reach of public ethical judgment. How men treated “their” women was a personal matter not open to public critique or restriction. With a few exceptions, the realm of the family generally existed beyond the reach of justice. The public/private split has been a focus of feminist criticism in multiple significant ways. Carole Pateman (1940–) asserted that “the dichotomy between the private and the public is central to almost two centuries of feminist writing and political struggle; it is, ultimately, what the feminist movement is about” (1983, 281). Pateman felt feminists should be suspicious of the public/private split for multiple reasons. First, the split between the public and the private is itself a mechanism of patriarchy. The private becomes a space in which men’s actions toward women exist beyond public reproach. Private family matters are to be addressed behind closed doors, out of the public eye. Second, Pateman argues that rather than existing as two separate spheres operating independently of one another, there is a necessary reliance of the public sphere on the private sphere. More specifically, the continuation of the public sphere is dependent on the free labor that primarily women perform in the private sphere as they tend to domestic life with all of the physical and emotional labor that it takes to keep a household running. Think of the scene from the 2016 animated film Sing, in which the mother pig, Rosita, attempts to automate her duties at home so she can attend a rehearsal for a singing competition. As viewers watch her Rube Goldberg housework contraption go hilariously awry, with piglets being washed as dishes, the sheer volume and intensity of the labor Rosita performs becomes shockingly apparent. Third, public work is culturally and socially overvalued at the expense of or to the exclusion of private work. One need think no further than the still widespread view that paid labor performed in the workforce is more valuable and important than the unpaid labor of raising children in the home. In general, feminist ethicists hold that family matters are, in fact, not private matters situated beyond the reach of ethics; rather, they are sometimes matters of ethics, and more specifically, justice. Feminists have thereby rejected traditional ethics’ inherent sequestering of private matters away from matters thought to be properly ethical, that is, a domain proper for ethical inquiry and investigation. For example, relations between members of a family— how husbands treat their wives—for centuries have been considered by many to be beyond the reach of ethical principles and judgment. But women battered by their husbands or children molested by relatives experience gross forms of injustice that are not simply PHILOSOPHY: FEMINISM 191 COPYRIGHT 2017 Macmillan Reference USA, a part of Gale, a Cengage Company WCN 02-200-210 Chapter 8: Feminist Ethics unfortunate private matters that constitute the skeletons in any family’s closet or the dirty laundry never to be aired in public. Beyond examples of sexual violence and assault, feminists argue that the division of labor within the home is not only an ethical matter but also a political one. Much of this movement in seeing private matters as matters of justice intersects with the feminist rallying call from the Second Wave of feminism: “the personal is political.” (This saying indicates another example of a boundary that feminist ethicists have challenged, that is, the boundary between the ethical and the political.) This discussion of the feminist critique of the private/public split demonstrates a shift in ethical content through the inclusion of new issues previously deemed to be outside the scope of ethics, as well as a shift in methodology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ethics, Politics and Feminist Organizing: Writing Feminist Infrapolitics and Affective Solidarity Into Everyday Sexism
    Vachhani, S. J., & Pullen, A. (2019). Ethics, politics and feminist organizing: Writing feminist infrapolitics and affective solidarity into everyday sexism. Human Relations, 72(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718780988 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1177/0018726718780988 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via SAGE at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018726718780988 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Ethics, politics and feminist organizing: Writing feminist infrapolitics and affective solidarity into everyday sexism Sheena J. Vachhani University of Bristol, UK Email: [email protected] Alison Pullen Macquarie Universtiy, Australia Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper critically examines a twenty-first century online, social movement, The Everyday Sexism Project (referred to as the ESP), to analyse resistance against sexism that is systemic, entrenched and institutionalised in society, including organizations. Our motivating questions are: what new forms of feminist organizing are developing to resist sexism and what are the implications of thinking ethico-politically about feminist resistance which has the goals of social justice, equality and fairness? Reading the ESP leads to a conceptualisation of how infrapolitical feminist resistance emerges at grassroots level and between individuals in the form of affective solidarity, which become necessary in challenging neoliberal threats to women’s opportunity and equality.
    [Show full text]
  • By Jennifer M. Fogel a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    A MODERN FAMILY: THE PERFORMANCE OF “FAMILY” AND FAMILIALISM IN CONTEMPORARY TELEVISION SERIES by Jennifer M. Fogel A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Communication) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Amanda D. Lotz, Chair Professor Susan J. Douglas Professor Regina Morantz-Sanchez Associate Professor Bambi L. Haggins, Arizona State University © Jennifer M. Fogel 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe my deepest gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee – Dr. Susan J. Douglas, Dr. Bambi L. Haggins, and Dr. Regina Morantz-Sanchez, who each contributed their time, expertise, encouragement, and comments throughout this entire process. These women who have mentored and guided me for a number of years have my utmost respect for the work they continue to contribute to our field. I owe my deepest gratitude to my advisor Dr. Amanda D. Lotz, who patiently refused to accept anything but my best work, motivated me to be a better teacher and academic, praised my successes, and will forever remain a friend and mentor. Without her constructive criticism, brainstorming sessions, and matching appreciation for good television, I would have been lost to the wolves of academia. One does not make a journey like this alone, and it would be remiss of me not to express my humble thanks to my parents and sister, without whom seven long and lonely years would not have passed by so quickly. They were both my inspiration and staunchest supporters. Without their tireless encouragement, laughter, and nurturing this dissertation would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Feminist Bioethics
    PHL 870 Seminar in Philosophy of Health Care A History of Feminist Bioethics Hilde Lindemann Wednesdays, 7:00-9:50 516 South Kedzie Hall Office hours: W 3-5 or as you need me [email protected] 353-3981 In Canada and the U.S., the bioethics movement and second-wave feminism both began in the late 1960s, but the two discourses had little to say to one another for the better part of two decades. The few essays by feminists published up to that time in the premier journal in bioethics, the Hastings Center Report, dealt solely with ethical issues surrounding women’s reproductive functions. All that has changed. The 1990s saw a steady stream of conferences, monographs, anthologies, and essays in learned journals that examine bioethical issues through a feminist lens, and now there is a burgeoning literature. In this seminar we will read some of this literature, to get a better idea of what feminist theory has to offer bioethics—and vice-versa. Texts for the course include Susan Sherwin’s No Longer Patient; Susan M. Wolf, ed., Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction, Dorothy Roberts’s Killing the Black Body, and Rebecca Kukla’s Mass Hysteria. Seminar participants will do a presentation of one of the readings and lead the discussion for that meeting, for a fourth of their final grade. The seminar paper counts toward the other three-fourths of the grade. Calendar Aug. 29. What is feminist bioethics? Sept. 5. Sherwin, No Longer Patient, Intro., “Understanding Feminism,” “Ethics, ‘Feminine Ethics,’ and Feminist Ethics,” “Feminism and Moral Relativism,” “Toward a Feminist Ethics of Health Care.” Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts EXISTENTIALIST ROOTS OF FEMINIST ETHICS A Dissertation in Philosophy by Deniz Durmus Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2015 The dissertation of Deniz Durmus was reviewed and approved* by the following: Shannon Sullivan Professor of Philosophy Women's Studies, and African American Studies, Department Head, Dissertation Advisor, Co-Chair Committee Sarah Clark Miller Associate Professor of Philosophy, Associate Director of Rock Ethics Institute, Co-Chair Committee John Christman Professor of Philosophy, Women’s Studies Robert Bernasconi Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Philosophy, African American Studies Christine Clark Evans Professor of French and Francophone Studies, Women’s Studies Amy Allen Liberal Arts Professor of Philosophy, Head of Philosophy Department *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT My dissertation “Existentialist Roots of Feminist Ethics” is an account of existentialist feminist ethics written from the perspective of ambiguous nature of interconnectedness of human freedoms. It explores existentialist tenets in feminist ethics and care ethics and reclaims existentialism as a resourceful theory in addressing global ethical issues. My dissertation moves beyond the once prevalent paradigm that feminist ethics should be devoid of any traditional ethical theories and it shows that an existential phenomenological ethics can complement feminist ethics in a productive way. The first chapter, introduces and discusses an existentialist notion of freedom based on Simone de Beauvoir and Jean Paul Sartre’s writings. In order to establish that human beings are metaphysically free, I explain notions of in-itself, for-itself, transcendence, immanence, facticity, and bad faith which are the basic notions of an existentialist notion of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2019 A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry Karina Bucciarelli Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses Part of the Epistemology Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucciarelli, Karina, "A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry" (2019). Scripps Senior Theses. 1365. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1365 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: PREVENTING KNOWLEDGE DISTORTIONS IN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY by KARINA MARTINS BUCCIARELLI SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR SUSAN CASTAGNETTO PROFESSOR RIMA BASU APRIL 26, 2019 Bucciarelli 2 Acknowledgements First off, I would like to thank my wonderful family for supporting me every step of the way. Mamãe e Papai, obrigada pelo amor e carinho, mil telefonemas, conversas e risadas. Obrigada por não só proporcionar essa educação incrível, mas também me dar um exemplo de como viver. Rafa, thanks for the jokes, the editing help and the spontaneous phone calls. Bela, thank you for the endless time you give to me, for your patience and for your support (even through WhatsApp audios). To my dear friends, thank you for the late study nights, the wild dance parties, the laughs and the endless support.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Feminist Ethics
    RETHINKING FEMINIST ETHICS The question of whether there can be distinctively female ethics is one of the most important and controversial debates in current gender studies, philosophy and psychology. Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust and Empathy marks a bold intervention in these debates by bridging the ground between women theorists disenchanted with aspects of traditional ‘male’ ethics and traditional theorists who insist upon the need for some ethical principles. Daryl Koehn provides one of the first critical overviews of a wide range of alternative female/ feminist/feminine ethics defended by influential theorists such as Carol Gilligan, Annette Baier, Nel Noddings and Diana Meyers. She shows why these ethics in their current form are not defensible and proposes a radically new alternative. In the first section, Koehn identifies the major tenets of ethics of care, trust and empathy. She provides a lucid, searching analysis of why female ethics emphasize a relational, rather than individualistic, self and why they favor a more empathic, less rule-based, approach to human interactions. At the heart of the debate over alternative ethics is the question of whether female ethics of care, trust and empathy constitute a realistic, practical alternative to the rule- based ethics of Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill and John Rawls. Koehn concludes that they do not. Female ethics are plagued by many of the same problems they impute to ‘male’ ethics, including a failure to respect other individuals. In particular, female ethics favor the perspective of the caregiver, trustor and empathizer over the viewpoint of those who are on the receiving end of care, trust and empathy.
    [Show full text]
  • APA NEWSLETTER on Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies
    NEWSLETTER | The American Philosophical Association Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies SPRING 2020 VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 2 FROM THE GUEST EDITOR Ben Hammer The Timeliness of Translating Chinese Philosophy: An Introduction to the APA Newsletter Special Issue on Translating Chinese Philosophy ARTICLES Roger T. Ames Preparing a New Sourcebook in Classical Confucian Philosophy Tian Chenshan The Impossibility of Literal Translation of Chinese Philosophical Texts into English Dimitra Amarantidou, Daniel Sarafinas, and Paul J. D’Ambrosio Translating Today’s Chinese Masters Edward L. Shaughnessy Three Thoughts on Translating Classical Chinese Philosophical Texts Carl Gene Fordham Introducing Premodern Text Translation: A New Field at the Crossroads of Sinology and Translation Studies SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND INFORMATION VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 2 SPRING 2020 © 2020 BY THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION ISSN 2155-9708 APA NEWSLETTER ON Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies BEN HAMMER, GUEST EDITOR VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 2 | SPRING 2020 Since most of us reading this newsletter have at least a FROM THE GUEST EDITOR vague idea of what Western philosophy is, we must understand that to then learn Chinese philosophy is truly The Timeliness of Translating Chinese to reinvent the wheel. It is necessary to start from the most basic notions of what philosophy is to be able to understand Philosophy: An Introduction to the APA what Chinese philosophy is. Newsletter Special Issue on Translating In the West, religion is religion and philosophy is Chinese Philosophy philosophy. In China, this line does not exist. For China and its close East Asian neighbors, Confucianism has guided Ben Hammer the social and spiritual lives of people for thousands of EDITOR, JOURNAL OF CHINESE HUMANITIES years in the same way the Judeo-Christian tradition has [email protected] guided people in the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism & Philosophy Vol.5 No.1
    APA Newsletters Volume 05, Number 1 Fall 2005 NEWSLETTER ON FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE EDITOR, SALLY J. SCHOLZ NEWS FROM THE COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN, ROSEMARIE TONG ARTICLES MARILYN FISCHER “Feminism and the Art of Interpretation: Or, Reading the First Wave to Think about the Second and Third Waves” JENNIFER PURVIS “A ‘Time’ for Change: Negotiating the Space of a Third Wave Political Moment” LAURIE CALHOUN “Feminism is a Humanism” LOUISE ANTONY “When is Philosophy Feminist?” ANN FERGUSON “Is Feminist Philosophy Still Philosophy?” OFELIA SCHUTTE “Feminist Ethics and Transnational Injustice: Two Methodological Suggestions” JEFFREY A. GAUTHIER “Feminism and Philosophy: Getting It and Getting It Right” SARA BEARDSWORTH “A French Feminism” © 2005 by The American Philosophical Association ISSN: 1067-9464 BOOK REVIEWS Robin Fiore and Hilde Lindemann Nelson: Recognition, Responsibility, and Rights: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory REVIEWED BY CHRISTINE M. KOGGEL Diana Tietjens Meyers: Being Yourself: Essays on Identity, Action, and Social Life REVIEWED BY CHERYL L. HUGHES Beth Kiyoko Jamieson: Real Choices: Feminism, Freedom, and the Limits of the Law REVIEWED BY ZAHRA MEGHANI Alan Soble: The Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings REVIEWED BY KATHRYN J. NORLOCK Penny Florence: Sexed Universals in Contemporary Art REVIEWED BY TANYA M. LOUGHEAD CONTRIBUTORS ANNOUNCEMENTS APA NEWSLETTER ON Feminism and Philosophy Sally J. Scholz, Editor Fall 2005 Volume 05, Number 1 objective claims, Beardsworth demonstrates Kristeva’s ROM THE DITOR “maternal feminine” as “an experience that binds experience F E to experience” and refuses to be “turned into an abstraction.” Both reconfigure the ground of moral theory by highlighting the cultural bias or particularity encompassed in claims of Feminism, like philosophy, can be done in a variety of different objectivity or universality.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Metaphysics Feminist Philosophy Collection
    Feminist Metaphysics Feminist Philosophy Collection Editor Elizabeth Potter Alice Andrews Quigley Professor of Women’s Studies, Mills College, Oakland, CA, USA Over the past 40 years, philosophy has become a vital arena for feminists. Recent feminist work has challenged canonical claims about the role of women and has developed new methods of analysis and critique, and in doing so has reinvigorated central areas of philosophy. The Feminist Philosophy Collection presents new work representative of feminist contributions to the six most significant areas of philosophy: Feminist Ethics and Political and Social Philosophy; Feminist Philosophy of Religion; Feminist Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art; Feminist Metaphysics; Feminist History of Philosophy; and Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Feminist work in some fields, notably ethics and social theory, has been going on for four decades, while feminist philosophy of art and aesthetics, as well as feminist metaphysics, are still young. Thus, some volumes will contain essays that build upon established feminist work as they explore new territory, while others break exciting new ground. Charlotte Witt Editor Feminist Metaphysics Explorations in the Ontology of Sex, Gender and the Self 123 Editor Prof. Charlotte Witt University of New Hampshire Durham, NH, USA [email protected] ISBN 978-90-481-3782-4 e-ISBN 978-90-481-3783-1 DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-3783-1 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtue of Feminist Rationality
    The Virtue of Feminist Rationality Continuum Studies in Philosophy Series Editor: James Fieser, University of Tennessee at Martin, USA Continuum Studies in Philosophy is a major monograph series from Continuum. The series features first-class scholarly research monographs across the whole field of philo- sophy. Each work makes a major contribution to the field of philosophical research. Aesthetic in Kant, James Kirwan Analytic Philosophy: The History of an Illusion, Aaron Preston Aquinas and the Ship of Theseus, Christopher Brown Augustine and Roman Virtue, Brian Harding The Challenge of Relativism, Patrick Phillips Demands of Taste in Kant’s Aesthetics, Brent Kalar Descartes and the Metaphysics of Human Nature, Justin Skirry Descartes’ Theory of Ideas, David Clemenson Dialectic of Romanticism, Peter Murphy and David Roberts Duns Scotus and the Problem of Universals, Todd Bates Hegel’s Philosophy of Language, Jim Vernon Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, David James Hegel’s Theory of Recognition, Sybol S.C. Anderson The History of Intentionality, Ryan Hickerson Kantian Deeds, Henrik Jøker Bjerre Kierkegaard, Metaphysics and Political Theory, Alison Assiter Kierkegaard’s Analysis of Radical Evil, David A. Roberts Leibniz Re-interpreted, Lloyd Strickland Metaphysics and the End of Philosophy, HO Mounce Nietzsche and the Greeks, Dale Wilkerson Origins of Analytic Philosophy, Delbert Reed Philosophy of Miracles, David Corner Platonism, Music and the Listener’s Share, Christopher Norris Popper’s Theory of Science, Carlos Garcia Postanalytic and Metacontinental, edited by James Williams, Jack Reynolds, James Chase and Ed Mares Rationality and Feminist Philosophy, Deborah K. Heikes Re-thinking the Cogito, Christopher Norris Role of God in Spinoza’s Metaphysics, Sherry Deveaux Rousseau and Radical Democracy, Kevin Inston Rousseau and the Ethics of Virtue, James Delaney Rousseau’s Theory of Freedom, Matthew Simpson Spinoza and the Stoics, Firmin DeBrabander Spinoza’s Radical Cartesian Mind, Tammy Nyden-Bullock St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of Feminist Epistemology and Feminist Ethics
    The Relevance of Feminist Epistemology and Feminist Ethics Gatien Laurol Florida Atlantic University Introduction Initially, I was hesitant to engage in the task of writing this essay. In my academic career, I have never studied feminist theory and felt it was not advisable for someone who has such limited knowledge to engage in any philosophical theorizing about feminist theory. Patriarchy, as I understand it, refers to the social, political and economic dominance of male power. Considering that I am a male who is the recipient of the social and political benefits of patriarchy, I was left to wonder if there was any way in which I can contribute to the recent studies of feminist epistemology in academia. It was not until after I was given the task of presenting a critical presentation on naturalized epistemology and feminist ethics that I was able to see that there are elements of feminist critiques that warrant critical recognition. Feminist theory is a misconceived topic in academia. Feminist theory is an intellectual movement that challenges the ways in which gender norms and values are sustained and the methodological and critical inquiry into the social and political structures that maintain them. It is through collaborative scholarship that feminist philosophers aim not only to understand the ways in which these norms subordinate women but also derive ways to overcome them. In essence, feminist theory repudiates traditional methods of philosophic inquiry that rely on detachment and distant engagement. Rather, feminist theory engages with various specialized fields of philosophy that recognizes the salience of the interconnected relationships that constitute our social, political, and ethical life.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Feminism Since Alison's Jaggar's Influential Work In
    Liberal Feminism Since Alison’s Jaggar’s influential work in constructing a taxonomy of feminist positions, “liberal feminists” have been taken to support a fundamentally libertarian political agenda based on the assumption that formal equality under the law suffices to eliminate male-female inequality and that additional state-supported programs which serve women’s interests, including affirmative action, the provision of child-care, family leave and the like, are unwarranted. In addition, some feminist philosophers suggest that liberal feminists "valorize" masculinity, are indifferent to the devaluation of female-identified work and that one of our fundamental goals is to establish, by a priori methods if necessary, that there are no gender-based psychological differences. These assumptions are false. In fact, many of us who are liberal feminists to the extent that we believe that women’s interests are best served by working toward a state of affairs where the expectations and opportunities for men and women are the same, do not hold these views. I shall argue that the real fault line between liberal feminists and the majority of feminist philosophers who are unsympathetic to this view marks a divergence in our understanding of the causes of gender inequality and, consequently, disagreement about the priorities of feminist political action. Male-Female Differences I recently discovered, to my surprise, that my work was cited as an example of the anti- feminist backlash, in paper by Keith Burgess-Jackson that appeared in Keith Burgess-Jackson misconstrues my position on two counts. First, he suggests that, ignoring empirical data, I dogmatically assert that there are no innate psychological differences between men and women.
    [Show full text]