Risk Assess Models 2008 FIN

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Risk Assess Models 2008 FIN Risk assessment models for establishment of exotic vertebrates in Australia and New Zealand Mary Bomford (2008) A report produced for the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre i Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre Risk assessment models for establishment of exotic vertebrates in Australia and New Zealand. Report prepared for Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre Project 9.D.1: Invasive pest vertebrates: Validating and refining risk assessment models. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre. The material presented in this report is based on sources that are believed to be reliable. Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation of the report, the author gives no warranty that the said sources are correct and accepts no responsibility for any resultant errors contained herein, any damages or loss whatsoever caused or suffered by any individual or corporation. Published by: Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre. Postal address: University of Canberra, ACT 2600. Office Location: University of Canberra, Kirinari Street, Bruce ACT 2617. Telephone: (02) 6201 2887 Facsimile: (02) 6201 2532 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.invasiveanimals.com ISBN: 978-0-9804999-7-1 Web ISBN: 978-0-9804999-8-8 © Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre 2008 This work is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, information or educational purposes. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced ii for such purposes provided acknowledgement of the source is included. Major extracts of the entire document may not be reproduced by any process. Cover design: Graphic Ark Cover images (left to right): Canada goose (Bill Jolly), stoat (Department of Conservation New Zealand), redfin perch (ACT Government) and brown anole (Carla Kishinami, Bishop Museum, Honolulu). Editor: Wendy Henderson (Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre) This document should be cited as: Bomford, M. (2008). Risk assessment models for establishment of exotic vertebrates in Australia and New Zealand. Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra. Risk assessment models for establishment of exotic vertebrates Foreword Exotic vertebrates can establish wild pest populations that prey on livestock and poultry, compete with livestock for food, eat valuable crops and cause land degradation through overgrazing. Exotic vertebrates also prey on and compete with native species for food and other resources, and may directly and indirectly modify ecosystems. They may reduce the range and abundance of native species or even cause them to become extinct. Other harm potentially caused by exotic vertebrates includes spreading diseases and hybridising with native species. There is a risk that new exotic species could establish as wild pests in Australia. When animals escape or are illegally released they can start new populations in the wild that breed and spread. Once an exotic species is widespread, eradication is virtually impossible. Pre-import screening of exotic vertebrates is recognised as a primary and cost-effective tool to prevent the potential harm caused by exotic vertebrates. The Bureau of Rural Sciences produced this report for the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre. The report provides information to assist government agencies increase public awareness and assess the risks posed by the import and keeping of exotic species. For example, the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts has the agreement of the publisher and contributing authors to republish the information that is relevant to the risk assessment processes for assessing the suitability of exotic animals for live import into Australia. This agreement will facilitate the use of information and tools in this report for scientific-based risk assessment in informing decisions under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. iii Prof Tony Peacock Chief Executive Invasive Animals CRC Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................... iii Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Risk of establishment ............................................................................................1 Risk of adverse impact ..........................................................................................2 Glossary ........................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Establishment .................................................................................................5 1.2 Impacts of exotic vertebrates ............................................................................8 1.2.1 Types of impact ...................................................................................8 1.2.2 Demonstrating impact ..........................................................................9 1.3 Assessing risk ...............................................................................................10 2. Exotic mammals and birds ......................................................................................... 12 2.1 Factors affecting the establishment success of exotic birds ....................................... 12 2.2 Factors affecting the establishment success of exotic mammals ..........................13 2.3 Risk assessment for the establishment of exotic mammals and birds introduced to Australia ..............................................................................14 2.4 Risk assessment for the establishment of exotic mammals and birds introduced to New Zealand .........................................................................15 2.5 Instructions for using the Australian Bird and Mammal Models ............................16 2.6 Instructions for using the New Zealand Bird and Mammal Models .........................29 iv 2.7 Factors affecting the pest status of exotic mammals and birds .............................32 3. Exotic reptiles and amphibians .................................................................................. 34 3.1 Introduction and release ................................................................................34 3.1.1 Reasons for introductions ...................................................................34 3.1.2 Reasons for release ...........................................................................35 3.1.3 Reasons for intentional or assisted spread ............................................37 3.1.4 Control and eradication ......................................................................37 3.2 Factors affecting the establishment success of exotic reptiles and amphibians .......38 3.2.1 Key factors affecting establishment success...........................................38 3.2.2 Other factors potentially affecting establishment success ........................42 3.3 Risk assessment for establishment of exotic reptiles and amphibians introduced to Australia ..............................................................................48 3.4 Instructions for using the Australian Reptile and Amphibian Model .......................51 3.5 Instructions for using the Bird and Mammal Model for reptiles and amphibians .......54 3.6 Instructions for using Bomford et al’s (2008) Reptile and Amphibian Model to rank establishment risk for exotic reptiles and amphibians introduced to Australia .....55 Risk assessment models for establishment of exotic vertebrates 3.7 Factors affecting assessments of the pest status of introduced reptiles and amphibians ........................................................................................61 3.7.1 Evidence reliability and impacts caused by confounding factors ................61 3.7.2 Sleepers, adaptation and niche changes................................................63 3.8 Adverse impacts and their significance for assessing pest status ..........................64 3.8.1 Competition for resources ...................................................................64 3.8.2 Predation ........................................................................................73 3.8.3 Habitat and ecological community impacts ............................................79 3.8.4 Potential to cause injuries ..................................................................82 3.8.5 Role as disease carriers and reservoirs ................................................83 3.8.6 Hybridisation with native species and other genetic changes ..................84 3.8.7 Social and economic impacts ...............................................................86 3.8.8 Other factors ...................................................................................88 3.9 Discussion of factors affecting pest status for introduced reptiles and amphibians ...90 4. Freshwater fish ........................................................................................................... 92 4.1 Factors affecting the establishment success of exotic freshwater
Recommended publications
  • A Review of Southern Iraq Herpetofauna
    Vol. 3 (1): 61-71, 2019 A Review of Southern Iraq Herpetofauna Nadir A. Salman Mazaya University College, Dhi Qar, Iraq *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: The present review discussed the species diversity of herpetofauna in southern Iraq due to their scientific and national interests. The review includes a historical record for the herpetofaunal studies in Iraq since the earlier investigations of the 1920s and 1950s along with the more recent taxonomic trials in the following years. It appeared that, little is known about Iraqi herpetofauna, and no comprehensive checklist has been done for these species. So far, 96 species of reptiles and amphibians have been recorded from Iraq, but only a relatively small proportion of them occur in the southern marshes. The marshes act as key habitat for globally endangered species and as a potential for as yet unexplored amphibian and reptile diversity. Despite the lack of precise localities, the tree frog Hyla savignyi, the marsh frog Pelophylax ridibunda and the green toad Bufo viridis are found in the marshes. Common reptiles in the marshes include the Caspian terrapin (Clemmys caspia), the soft-shell turtle (Trionyx euphraticus), the Euphrates softshell turtle (Rafetus euphraticus), geckos of the genus Hemidactylus, two species of skinks (Trachylepis aurata and Mabuya vittata) and a variety of snakes of the genus Coluber, the spotted sand boa (Eryx jaculus), tessellated water snake (Natrix tessellata) and Gray's desert racer (Coluber ventromaculatus). More recently, a new record for the keeled gecko, Cyrtopodion scabrum and the saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus sochureki) was reported. The IUCN Red List includes six terrestrial and six aquatic amphibian species.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertação Final.Pdf
    INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS DA AMAZÔNIA – INPA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA DE ÁGUA DOCE E PESCA INTERIOR - BADPI CARACTERIZAÇÃO CITOGENÉTICA EM ESPÉCIES DE Cichla BLOCH & SCHNEIDER, 1801 (PERCIFORMES, CICHLIDAE) COM ÊNFASE NOS HÍBRIDOS INTERESPECÍFICOS JANICE MACHADO DE QUADROS MANAUS-AM 2019 JANICE MACHADO DE QUADROS CARACTERIZAÇÃO CITOGENÉTICA EM ESPÉCIES DE Cichla BLOCH & SCHNEIDER, 1801 (PERCIFORMES, CICHLIDAE) COM ÊNFASE NOS HÍBRIDOS INTERESPECÍFICOS ORIENTADORA: Eliana Feldberg, Dra. COORIENTADOR: Efrem Jorge Gondim Ferreira, Dr. Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação do Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS, área de concentração Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior. MANAUS-AM 2019 Ficha Catalográfica Q1c Quadros, Janice Machado de CARACTERIZAÇÃO CITOGENÉTICA EM ESPÉCIES DE Cichla BLOCH & SCHNEIDER, 1801 (PERCIFORMES, CICHLIDAE) COM ÊNFASE NOS HÍBRIDOS INTERESPECÍFICOS / Janice Machado de Quadros; orientadora Eliana Feldberg; coorientadora Efrem Ferreira. -- Manaus:[s.l], 2019. 56 f. Dissertação (Mestrado - Programa de Pós Graduação em Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior) -- Coordenação do Programa de Pós- Graduação, INPA, 2019. 1. Hibridação. 2. Tucunaré. 3. Heterocromatina. 4. FISH. 5. DNAr. I. Feldberg, Eliana, orient. II. Ferreira, Efrem, coorient. III. Título. CDD: 639.2 Sinopse: A fim de investigar a existência de híbridos entre espécies de Cichla, nós analisamos, por meio de técnicas de citogenética clássica e molecular indivíduos de C. monoculus, C. temensis, C. pinima, C. kelberi, C. piquiti, C. vazzoleri de diferentes locais da bacia amazônica e entre eles, três indivíduos foram considerados, morfologicamente, híbridos. Todos os indivíduos apresentaram 2n=48 cromossomos acrocêntricos. A heterocromatina foi encontrada preferencialmente em regiões centroméricas e terminais, com variações entre indivíduos de C.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY Poeciliidae Bonaparte 1831
    FAMILY Poeciliidae Bonaparte 1831 - viviparous toothcarps, livebearers SUBFAMILY Poeciliinae Bonaparte 1831 - viviparous toothcarps [=Unipupillati, Paecilini, Belonesocini, Cyprinodontidae limnophagae, Gambusiinae, Tomeurinae, Poeciliopsinae, Heterandriini, Guirardinini, Cnesterodontini, Pamphoriini, Xiphophorini, Alfarini, Quintanini, Xenodexiinae, Dicerophallini, Scolichthyinae, Priapellini, Brachyrhaphini, Priapichthyini] GENUS Alfaro Meek, 1912 - livebearers [=Furcipenis, Petalosoma, Petalurichthys] Species Alfaro cultratus (Regan, 1908) - Regan's alfaro [=acutiventralis, amazonum] Species Alfaro huberi (Fowler, 1923) - Fowler's alfaro GENUS Belonesox Kner, 1860 - pike topminnows Species Belonesox belizanus Kner, 1860 - pike topminnow [=maxillosus] GENUS Brachyrhaphis Regan, 1913 - viviparous toothcarps [=Plectrophallus, Trigonophallus] Species Brachyrhaphis cascajalensis (Meek & Hildebrand, 1913) - Río Cascajal toothcarp Species Brachyrhaphis episcopi (Steindachner, 1878) - Obispo toothcarp [=latipunctata] Species Brachyrhaphis hartwegi Rosen & Bailey, 1963 - Soconusco gambusia Species Brachyrhaphis hessfeldi Meyer & Etzel, 2001 - Palenque toothcarp Species Brachyrhaphis holdridgei Bussing, 1967 - Tronadora toothcarp Species Brachyrhaphis olomina (Meek, 1914) - Orotina toothcarp Species Brachyrhaphis parismina (Meek, 1912) - Parismina toothcarp Species Brachyrhaphis punctifer (Hubbs, 1926) - Quibari Creek toothcarp Species Brachyrhaphis rhabdophora (Regan, 1908) - Río Grande de Terraba toothcarp [=tristani] Species Brachyrhaphis roseni
    [Show full text]
  • The Lizard Fauna of Kurdistan Province, Western Iran
    Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics (IJAB) Vol.8, No.1, 27-37, 2012 ISSN: 1735-434X The Lizard Fauna of Kurdistan Province, Western Iran Bahmani, Z.a,c*, Karamiani, R. b,c, Gharzi, A.a,c aDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran bDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Razi University, 6714967346 Kermanshah, Iran cIranian Plateau Herpetology Research Group (IPHRG), Faculty of Science, Razi University, 6714967346 Kermanshah, Iran Kurdistan Province in the western Iran possesses varied climatic and geographical conditions that led to rich biodiversity. An investigation on the status of lizards in this Province was carried out from June 2010 to September 2011. A total of 73 specimens were collected and identified. The collected specimens represented four families, 10 genera, and 14 species and subspecies, including Agamidae: Laudakia nupta nupta, Laudakia caucasia and Trapelus lessonae, Gekkonidae: Cyrtopodion scabrum, Asaccus kurdistanensis, Lacertidae: Eremias montanus, Eremias sp. (1) and Eremias sp. (2) (unknown taxa which may be related to E. persica complex), Apathya cappadocica urmiana, A. c. muhtari, Lacerta media media and Ophisops elegans, Scinicidae: Eumeces schneideri princeps and Trachylepis aurata transcaucasica. With respect to the data which was reported by Rastegar-Pouyani et al. (2008) and Anderson (1999) Eremias sp. (1) and Eremias sp. (2) may belong to two new taxa, Apathya cappadocica muhtari is a new record from Iran, and also Eremias montanus is a new record from Kurdistan
    [Show full text]
  • A REVISION of the GAMBUSIA NICARAGUENSIS SPECIES GROUP (PISCES:POECILIIDAE) by William L. Fink ABSTRACT in Addition to Gambusia
    Reprinted from PUBLICATIONS OF THE GULF COAST RESEARCH LABORATORY MUSEUM 2:47-77, June 18, 1971 A REVISION OF THE GAMBUSIA NICARAGUENSIS SPECIES GROUP (PISCES:POECILIIDAE) by William L. Fink ABSTRACT In addition to Gambusia nicaraguensis, the species group includes G. wrayi, G. mela pleura and G. his paniolae sp. nov. G. gracilior is a junior synonym of G. wrayi and G. dominicensis is found to be a member of another species group. A key and zoogeographical notes are provided for the group. Rivas (1963) published on subgenera and species groups in the genus Gambusia. He used only gonopodial characters in defining his groups, and I believe that his system is both natural and practical. Subsequent investigation has shown a need to review his findings and to make adjust- ments in the system. I have found that G. dominicensis is a member of another species group and that the species referred to as dominicensis by Rivas (1963) is actually undescribed. Otherwise, I accept his G. nicara- guensis species group and feel that its revision will help clarify other prob- lems within the genus. METHODS.—Methods are those of Fink (1971). Abbreviations are as follows: ANSP - Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia; BMNH - British Museum (Natural History); GCRL - Gulf Coast Re- search Laboratory; UMMZ - University of Michigan Museum of Zoology; USNM - United States National Museum. Unless otherwise noted, lengths are standard length (SL); descriptions of coloration are from alcoholic specimens; all material examined is not included in the tables. 47 DIAGNOSIS OF THE SPECIES GROUP.—Length of gonopodium about one-third of SL.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Bay of Bengal
    Herpetology Notes, volume 13: 631-637 (2020) (published online on 05 August 2020) An update to species distribution records of geckos (Reptilia: Squamata: Gekkonidae) on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Bay of Bengal Ashwini V. Mohan1,2,* The Andaman and Nicobar Islands are rifted arc-raft of 2004, and human-mediated transport can introduce continental islands (Ali, 2018). Andaman and Nicobar additional species to these islands (Chandramouli, 2015). Islands together form the largest archipelago in the In this study, I provide an update for the occurrence Bay of Bengal and a high proportion of terrestrial and distribution of species in the family Gekkonidae herpetofauna on these islands are endemic (Das, 1999). (geckos) on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Although often lumped together, the Andamans and Nicobars are distinct from each other in their floral Materials and Methods and faunal species communities and are geographically Teams consisted of between 2–4 members and we separated by the 10° Channel. Several studies have conducted opportunistic visual encounter surveys in shed light on distribution, density and taxonomic accessible forested and human-modified areas, both aspects of terrestrial herpetofauna on these islands during daylight hours and post-sunset. These surveys (e.g., Das, 1999; Chandramouli, 2016; Harikrishnan were carried out specifically for geckos between and Vasudevan, 2018), assessed genetic diversity November 2016 and May 2017, this period overlapped across island populations (Mohan et al., 2018), studied with the north-east monsoon and summer seasons in the impacts of introduced species on herpetofauna these islands. A total of 16 islands in the Andaman and and biodiversity (e.g., Mohanty et al., 2016a, 2019), Nicobar archipelagos (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herpetofauna of Timor-Leste: a First Report 19 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.109.1439 Research Article Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 109: 19–86 (2011) The herpetofauna of Timor-Leste: a first report 19 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.109.1439 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The herpetofauna of Timor-Leste: a first report Hinrich Kaiser1, Venancio Lopes Carvalho2, Jester Ceballos1, Paul Freed3, Scott Heacox1, Barbara Lester3, Stephen J. Richards4, Colin R. Trainor5, Caitlin Sanchez1, Mark O’Shea6 1 Department of Biology, Victor Valley College, 18422 Bear Valley Road, Victorville, California 92395, USA; and The Foundation for Post-Conflict Development, 245 Park Avenue, 24th Floor, New York, New York 10167, USA 2 Universidade National Timor-Lorosa’e, Faculdade de Ciencias da Educaçao, Departamentu da Biologia, Avenida Cidade de Lisboa, Liceu Dr. Francisco Machado, Dili, Timor-Leste 3 14149 S. Butte Creek Road, Scotts Mills, Oregon 97375, USA 4 Conservation International, PO Box 1024, Atherton, Queensland 4883, Australia; and Herpetology Department, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia 5 School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Australia 6 West Midland Safari Park, Bewdley, Worcestershire DY12 1LF, United Kingdom; and Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Vic- toria 3010, Australia Corresponding author: Hinrich Kaiser ([email protected]) Academic editor: Franco Andreone | Received 4 November 2010 | Accepted 8 April 2011 | Published 20 June 2011 Citation: Kaiser H, Carvalho VL, Ceballos J, Freed P, Heacox S, Lester B, Richards SJ, Trainor CR, Sanchez C, O’Shea M (2011) The herpetofauna of Timor-Leste: a first report. ZooKeys 109: 19–86.
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Fossil Gecko Hand Reveals a Strikingly Modern Scansorial Morphology: Qualitative and Biometric Analysis of an Amber-Preserved Lizard Hand
    Cretaceous Research 84 (2018) 120e133 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes Cretaceous fossil gecko hand reveals a strikingly modern scansorial morphology: Qualitative and biometric analysis of an amber-preserved lizard hand * Gabriela Fontanarrosa a, Juan D. Daza b, Virginia Abdala a, c, a Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical, CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, Argentina b Department of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State University, 1900 Avenue I, Lee Drain Building Suite 300, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA c Catedra de Biología General, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, Argentina article info abstract Article history: Gekkota (geckos and pygopodids) is a clade thought to have originated in the Early Cretaceous and that Received 16 May 2017 today exhibits one of the most remarkable scansorial capabilities among lizards. Little information is Received in revised form available regarding the origin of scansoriality, which subsequently became widespread and diverse in 15 September 2017 terms of ecomorphology in this clade. An undescribed amber fossil (MCZ Re190835) from mid- Accepted in revised form 2 November 2017 Cretaceous outcrops of the north of Myanmar dated at 99 Ma, previously assigned to stem Gekkota, Available online 14 November 2017 preserves carpal, metacarpal and phalangeal bones, as well as supplementary climbing structures, such as adhesive pads and paraphalangeal elements. This fossil documents the presence of highly specialized Keywords: Squamata paleobiology adaptive structures. Here, we analyze in detail the manus of the putative stem Gekkota. We use Paraphalanges morphological comparisons in the context of extant squamates, to produce a detailed descriptive analysis Hand evolution and a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on 32 skeletal variables of the manus.
    [Show full text]
  • Etroplus Suratensis) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Green Chromide Cichlid (Etroplus suratensis) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, April 2011 Revised, September 2018 Web Version, 6/5/2019 Photo: P. Corbett. Licensed under CC BY 2.0. Available: https://flic.kr/p/tmiiei. (September 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Western Indian Ocean: India and Sri Lanka.” 1 From Abraham (2011): “Etroplus suratensis is distributed in the coastal regions of peninsular India and Sri Lanka. In India, the wild populations have been recorded from the states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. This species is in trade in the United States. From Imperial Tropicals (2015): “Green Chromide Cichlid (Etroplus suratensis) […] $ 19.99” From Bluegrass Aquatics (2019): “Green Chromide Cichlid – REGULAR $26.98” Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Acanthopterygii Order Perciformes Suborder Labroidei Family Cichlidae Genus Etroplus Species Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790)” From Fricke et al. (2018): “Current status: Valid as Etroplus suratensis (Bloch 1790). Cichlidae: Etroplinae.” 2 Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Max length : 40.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Menon 1999]; common length : 20.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Pethiyagoda 1991]” Environment From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Brackish; benthopelagic; depth range 10 - ? m.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Boundaries, Biogeography, and Intra-Archipelago Genetic Variation Within the Emoia Samoensis Species Group in the Vanuatu Archipelago and Oceania" (2008)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 Species boundaries, biogeography, and intra- archipelago genetic variation within the Emoia samoensis species group in the Vanuatu Archipelago and Oceania Alison Madeline Hamilton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Hamilton, Alison Madeline, "Species boundaries, biogeography, and intra-archipelago genetic variation within the Emoia samoensis species group in the Vanuatu Archipelago and Oceania" (2008). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3940. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3940 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. SPECIES BOUNDARIES, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND INTRA-ARCHIPELAGO GENETIC VARIATION WITHIN THE EMOIA SAMOENSIS SPECIES GROUP IN THE VANUATU ARCHIPELAGO AND OCEANIA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Alison M. Hamilton B.A., Simon’s Rock College of Bard, 1993 M.S., University of Florida, 2000 December 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my graduate advisor, Dr. Christopher C. Austin, for sharing his enthusiasm for reptile diversity in Oceania with me, and for encouraging me to pursue research in Vanuatu. His knowledge of the logistics of conducting research in the Pacific has been invaluable to me during this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The AQUATIC DESIGN CENTRE
    The AQUATIC DESIGN CENTRE ltd 26 Zennor Road Trade Park, Balham, SW12 0PS Ph: 020 7580 6764 [email protected] PLEASE CALL TO CHECK AVAILABILITY ON DAY Complete Freshwater Livestock (2019) Livebearers Common Name In Stock Y/N Limia melanogaster Y Poecilia latipinna Dalmatian Molly Y Poecilia latipinna Silver Lyre Tail Molly Y Poecilia reticulata Male Guppy Asst Colours Y Poecilia reticulata Red Cap, Cobra, Elephant Ear Guppy Y Poecilia reticulata Female Guppy Y Poecilia sphenops Molly: Black, Canary, Silver, Marble. y Poecilia velifera Sailfin Molly Y Poecilia wingei Endler's Guppy Y Xiphophorus hellerii Swordtail: Pineapple,Red, Green, Black, Lyre Y Xiphophorus hellerii Kohaku Swordtail, Koi, HiFin Xiphophorus maculatus Platy: wagtail,blue,red, sunset, variatus Y Tetras Common Name Aphyocarax paraguayemsis White Tip Tetra Aphyocharax anisitsi Bloodfin Tetra Y Arnoldichthys spilopterus Red Eye Tetra Y Axelrodia riesei Ruby Tetra Bathyaethiops greeni Red Back Congo Tetra Y Boehlkea fredcochui Blue King Tetra Copella meinkeni Spotted Splashing Tetra Crenuchus spilurus Sailfin Characin y Gymnocorymbus ternetzi Black Widow Tetra Y Hasemania nana Silver Tipped Tetra y Hemigrammus erythrozonus Glowlight Tetra y Hemigrammus ocelifer Beacon Tetra y Hemigrammus pulcher Pretty Tetra y Hemigrammus rhodostomus Diamond Back Rummy Nose y Hemigrammus rhodostomus Rummy nose Tetra y Hemigrammus rubrostriatus Hemigrammus vorderwimkieri Platinum Tetra y Hyphessobrycon amandae Ember Tetra y Hyphessobrycon amapaensis Amapa Tetra Y Hyphessobrycon bentosi
    [Show full text]