DOCSLIB.ORG

The Neuroptera and Mecoptera of Eastern Fennoscandia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Neuroptera and Mecoptera of Eastern Fennoscandia SOCIETAS PRO I;'AUNA ET FLORA FENNICA FAUNA FENlv~ICA 13 THE NEUROPTERA AND MECOPTERA OF EASTERN FENNOSCANDIA BY MARTIN MEINANDER ZOOLOGICAL E~STITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HELSINGFORS \VITH 127 FIGURES AND 39 MAPS HELSINKI - HELSINGFORS 1962 PRINTED IN FINLAND BY TILGMANN HELSINKI-HELSINGFORS 1962 J;'Al.1KA FENNICA IB INTRODUCTION The first list of Finnish Neuroptera and Mecoptera was published in 1881 by hILJAN'DER (Medd. Soc. F. Fl. Fenn. VII, 152-1(6), it included only 14 species of Neuroptera and 4 of Mecoptera. vVhen O. lVI. REUTER in 1894 ,~Acta Soc. F. Fl. Fenn. IX Nr 8) published a new list, the number of species, as ,ye understand them now, had increased to 38 (Neuroptera). In the twentieth century interest in collecting Neuroptera has increased greatly, nevertheless no list has been published, including the distribution of the orders since REU­ TER'S paper. A list published by the Entomological Society for Exchange (Enumeratio Insectorum Fenniae IV) in 1935 enumerated 58 species of Neurop­ tera and 6 of Mecoptera, the number of species had thus increased by 22. At present there are 61 Neuroptera and 6 Mecoptera. The knowledge of the dis­ tr;bution of Neuroptera and Mecoptera has accordingly increased since the last published list, therein lies the justification for the publishing of a new one. In this list all information about the distribution in Eastern Fennoscandia (i. e. Finland, including the provinces surrendered to Russia in 1940 and 1944, Russian Carelia and the Kola Peninsula) has been included. All species known from this area have also been recorded within the present boundaries of Fin­ land. The list is based upon material including about 7000 specimens of Neurop­ tera and 400 of Mecoptera. I have examined the following collections: Zoological ~ruseum of the University of Helsingfors (including the collections of KLING­ STEIn, I .. INDBERG, PALM1~N, POPP1US, REUTER, SAHLBERG etc.), the Zoological ~[useum of Turun Yliopisto, Museum of Natural History in Kuopio, the col­ lection belonging to Lounais-Hameen Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys, and the pri­ vate collections of H. AHLQVIST, E. A. HELLMAN, 1. ]ALAS, ]. KAISILA, )1. )IEINANDER, A. NORDMAN, E. THUNEBERG and A. \VEGELIUS. In the last list (1935), which was published about the FinnishNeuroptera, j.';: species were included. Of these, one must be omitted; Chrysopa prasina Burm. now regarded as a synonym of C. ventralis Curt. But since the publica­ tion of the list four new species have been identified within the country; Sisyra terminalis Curt., K£mm£nsia rava \Vithyc., Sympherobius elegans Steph. and J[l'rmeleon bore Tjed. .:.1:1 arti n 1\1/ ei'n/ander: N europtera and J.\tIecoptera Knowledge of the distribution of the Neuroptera is extensive for the larger and more conspicuous species, but the smaller ones, especially the Coniop­ terygids have been almost ignored. lVlost information exists from Southern Finland (AI-Kl) and within this area Regio Aboe1~sis and Nylandia have 52 species. Lapland is also well known, but in Central Finland a void exists. The Russian provinces, since the)T became inaccessible, have virtually not been investigated. After 1918 Finnish collectors have had the possibility to collect in a few of the provinces only during the war. The activity of Russian collectors is unknown and no RtlSsian material has been examined. Best known of the Russian provinces is Kol \vith 19 species, from Kk and Lp there are no records. Of the 61 species known from Eastern Fennoscandia about half (28 species) are spread over the entire area. Of these, however, two species are not recorded from the area north of the arctic circle: Coniopteryx tineiformis, which has perhaps been overlooked by the collectors because of its small size; and Micro­ mus paganus, which, hovvever, has been recorded from Finmark in Norway. Among the lVlecoptera there is only one species of general occurrence: Bore'tts westwoodi. Panorpa co'mmu'nis occurs in all the areas south of the arctic circle. The species which have limited, restricted distributions may be divided as follows: Southwestern specles Sisyra terminalis. The species seems to be very local, but may perhaps be found in other places. In Sweden it has a decidely southern distribution. Hemerobius micans. Strictly a southern species. H emerobius lutescens. Similar to H. micans. Hemerobius cont'umax. A very rare species, which may be found in other areas, but in Sweden it is also known only from south of 61 0 N. lat. Kimminsia subnebulosa. A wide-spread species, which seems to be especially confined to towns and villages. There are numerous specimens from dif­ ferent years known frotTI Helsingfors and only a few records from other places. Sympherobius elegans. Only on the Aland Islands (AI). SY1npherobius pygmaeus. A decidedly southern species in Sweden too. Chrysopa impunctata. Extremely rare. In Sweden kno\vn only from Smaland and Uppland. Of the species belonging to this group none have been captured in western Fennoscandia north of 61 0 N. lat. FAUNA FENNICAIH 5 Sou the r n s p e c i e s not known north of 61 ° N. lat. This group in­ cludes species with a decidedly southern distribution, without being south­ western species. Raphidia notata. Has a corresponding distribution in Svveden, but is known from inner NordtT0ndelag in Norvvay (about 6110 N. lat.). H emerob£us fenestratus. Chrysopa flava. Chrysopa ciliata. Sou the r n s p e c 1 e s with a slightly more northern distribution. This group is a rather large one, containing 13 species of Neuroptera and 2 Mecoptera. Sialis lutar£a (62°), C oniopteryx borealis ((;3°), S£syra jutland£ca (63°), Psectra diptera (62°), AI'egalomus hirtus (63°), Drepanopteryx phalaenoides (63°), Chrysopa vittata (63°), C. septempunctata (63°), c. ven.tralis (63°), C. phyl­ lochroma (62°), C. dorsalis (62°), M yrmeleon formicarius (64°), ll;[. bore (62°), Panorpa cognata (63°) and P. germanica (64°). All the mentioned species have a corresponding distribution in western Fennoscandia except S£alis llitaria, which is a common species in all western Fennoscandia, from Skane in the south to the parts of Norway which are north of Finland. E a s t ern dis t rib uti 0 n. Only four species are included m this group. Sialis fu,[£g£nosa. Has been recorded from all parts of Finland except the south­ western. The species occurs, however, in all western Fennoscandia and the British Isles, so the distribution in Eastern Fennoscandia is difficult to explain. Chrysopa dasyptera. Panorpa alpina. The species is recorded from the coast of the Bothnian Gulf but is not noted from southwestern Finland or western Fennoscandia. Panorpa hybrida. Northern species Sialis s£b£r£ca. Hemerobius atr£frons. Has a corresponding distribution in Sweden but is known from southwestern Norway and widely spread in Europe. There are further species about which it is difficult to deduce any definite conclusions: 1l1ocellia crass£cornis. In Fennoscandia known only from Kuusamo and Da­ laecarlia. Parasemidalis fuscipennis. Known from Southwestern Finland and Russian Carelia. 6 111 arti'lZ ~11 einande'Y : N europtera and Mecoptera Kimlninsia rava. Except for three specimens from Helsingfors recorded only from the British Isles. Chrysopa 'lRJalkeri. Found only once in Finland. Boreus hyemalis is notable because it is recorded neither from Eastern Fennoscandia, nor from Norway, but occurs in various locals in Sweden. In the present list every' species captured in eastern Fennoscandia is acconl­ panied by a record of all locals from which it is positively known. With regard to the distribution in western Fennoscandia it is only mentioned whether the species occurs in Svveden or Norway_ I have treated likewise the Baltic Prov­ inces (i. e. Esthonia, Latvia and Liethuania). The distribution outside this area in only very sumnlarily tloted. The distributions are also given in tabular form, showing the occurrence of species in the different provinces of Finland (cf. map on p.7), and moreover the distribution of most species is shown on maps, including only the records from eastern Fennoscalldia. In Finland ·v"ery little has been published on the phenology of the Neur­ optera and l\iecoptera. I have given belovv (p. 8) in tabular form the dates of occurence of the imagines, as far as th.ey are known. In the first table all the dates of the specilnens collected in southern Finland (i. e. AI-Oa) have been marked and in the second those of the specimens collected in northern Finland. The first table gives a fairly good picture of the occurrence of tIle species during the summer. The latter, ho\vever, is rather incomplete due to the restricted material available. The main purpose of this paper is to describe what is kno,,'"n about the distribution of Neuroptera and l\Iecoptera in eastern Fennoscandia. Keys to the species and short diagnoses have, ho\vever, been incltlded in order to facilitate the determination of the Finnish insects of these orders. For persons interested in more extensive work on the Neuroptera occuring in Finland, the excellent monograph on British Neuroptera by KILLINGTON" (1.936-1937) provides valuable details. All the Finnish species of l\lecoptera have been extensively treated in 'I'JEDER'S Svensk Insektfauna Nr 41. The determination keys include not only all species known from eastern Fennoscandia but also those known fronl western Fennoscandia yet not recorded from eastern Fel1noscandia. The terminology is surel~y understood by all entomologists, but the special­ ities of the wing venation have been slightly elaborated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toponymic Guidelines (Pdf)
    UNITED NATIONS GROUP OF EXPERTS ON GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES 22nd session, New York, 20-29 April 2004 Item 17 of the provisional agenda TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP EDITORS AND OTHER EDITORS FINLAND Fourth, revised edition 2004* (v. 4.11, April 2021**) * Prepared by Sirkka Paikkala (Research Institute for the Languages of Finland) in collaboration with the Na- tional Land Survey of Finland (Teemu Leskinen) and the Geographical Society of Finland (Kerkko Hakulinen). The 22nd session of UNGEGN in 2004, WP 49. The first edition of this paper, Toponymic Guidelines for International Cartography - Finland, submitted by Mr. A. Rostvik, Norden Division, was presented to the Ninth session of UNGEGN 1981 (WP 37). The second version, Toponymic guidelines for cartography: Finland, prepared by the Onomastic Division of the Finnish Research Centre for Domestic Languages in collabo- ration with the Swedish Language Division and the National Board of Survey, was presented to the 4th UN Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names in 1982 (E/CONF.74/L.41). The second edition, Toponymic Guidelines for Map an Other Editors, pre- paired by the Finnish Research Centre for Domestic Languages together with National Land Survey, was presented to the 17th session of UNGEGNUnited in 1994 (WP 63). The third edi- tion (revised version), prepared by Sirkka Paikkala in collaboration with the National Land Sur- vey of Finland and the Geographical Society of Finland, was presented to the 7th UN Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names (New York, 13-22 January 1998, E/CONF.91/L. 17) ** Editions 4.1 - 4.6 updated by Sirkka Paikkala (Institute for the Languages of Finland) and Teemu Leskinen (National Land Survey of Finland).
    [Show full text]
  • Sade Kahra CURRICULUM VITAE Born 31.01.1974 Based in Jakobstad/Turku [email protected]
    Sade Kahra CURRICULUM VITAE Born 31.01.1974 Based in Jakobstad/Turku [email protected] www.kahra.fi Solo exhibitions • VB-valokuvakeskus, Kuopio, Finland 2021 • Galleria TILA, Helsinki, Finland 2013, 2017, 2018, 2020 • BioCity, Kupittaa, Turku, Finland 2018 • Galleri 67, Stockholm, Sweden 2016 • Threewalls studio gallery, Chicago, USA 2012 • Galleri Zebra, Galleri Kantti and Karelia, Raseborg, Finland 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013 • Pohjoinen valokuvakeskus, Oulu, Finland 2006 • Galleria Heino, Helsinki, Finland 2006, 2013 • Kaunas Photo Days, Kaunas, Lithuania 2004 • Norrbottens museum, Luleå, Sweden 2003 • Galleri Jan Linder, Stockholm, Sweden 2000 • Esplanadin lava, Helsinki, Finland 1999 • Puristamo, Kaapelitehdas, Helsinki, Finland 1997 • Galleria INTO, Helsinki, Finland 1997 Group exhibitions • Faces 2.0, Ekaterinburg Museum of Fine Arts, Ekaterinburg, Russia 2018 • Photography Days, Preus Museum, Horten, Norway 2018 • Ultimate Impact, Rundetaarn, Copenhagen, Denmark 2017 • 81st anniversary exhibition of Turku Artists’ Association, Finland 2013, 2018 • Art Fair Suomi, Cable Factory, Helsinki, Finland 2008- • Fiskars Village summer exhibitions at the Granary and Copper Smithy 2006 - 2013 • Regarde moi! at the Finnish-African Cultural Centre, Benin 2012 • Night Shift, Galleri Elverket, Ekenäs, Finland 2011 • Huomenta Afrikka!, Helsinki Kunsthall, Finland 2010 • Laitumella, Hyvinkää Art Museum, Finland 2010 • Återseende, Fiskars Village, Finland and Nora, Sweden 2009 • Pep talk for Hemnesberget, Kunst i Nordland, Norway (group project) 2009 •
    [Show full text]
  • Selostus, Osa B: Teemakohtaiset Taulukot Ja Kartat
    SATAKUNNAN VAIHEMAAKUNTAKAAVA 2 Selostus, osa B Kaavaselostuksen osa B sisältää Satakunnan vaihemaakuntakaavan 2 sisällön mukaiset teemakartat ja niihin liittyvät taulukot. Teemakartat ja taulukot korvaavat Satakunnan maakuntakaavan selostuksen osan B vastaavat kartat ja taulukot. Teemakartassa on joko yksilöity kohteen nimi tai kohdenumero, joka viittaa luettelossa olevaan kohteeseen. Kohteesta on pääsääntöisesti kuvattu kunta, jossa kohde sijaitsee, kohteen nimi, tunnus vaihemaakuntakaavakartalla ja pinta-ala ja/tai kpl määrä. Sisällysluettelo Maakunnan tarkoituksenmukainen alue- ja yhdyskuntarakenne 1. Taajamatoimintojen alueet, taulukko 1 ja kartta 1 2. Keskustatoimintojen, vähittäiskaupan suuryksikköjen ja palvelujen alueet sekä työpaikka- alueet, taulukko 2 ja kartta 2 3. Tilaa vaativan kaupan kehittämisvyöhykkeet, taulukko 3 ja kartta 3 Ympäristön ja talouden kannalta kestävät liikenteen ja teknisen huollon järjestelyt 4. Lentoliikenteen maantietukikohdan suojavyöhykkeet, taulukko 4 ja kartta 4 5. Terminaalitoimintojen alueet, taulukko 5 ja kartta 5 6. Aurinkoenergian tuotannon kehittämisen kohdealueet, taulukko 6 ja kartta 6 Vesi- ja maa-ainesvarojen kestävä käyttö 7. Maa-ainesten ottoalueet, (turvetuotanto) ja selvitysalueet, taulukot 7 a-b ja kartta 7 Maiseman, luonnonarvojen ja kulttuuriperinnön vaaliminen 8. Valtakunnallisesti arvokkaat maisema-alueet, taulukko 8 ja kartta 8 9. Valtakunnallisesti arvokkaat maisema-alueet, ehdotus, taulukko 9 ja kartta 9 10. Maisemallisesti tärkeät alueet, taulukko 10 ja kartta 10 11. Valtakunnallisesti
    [Show full text]
  • Population Structure 2009
    Population 2010 Population Structure 2009 Number of persons aged under 15 in Finland’s population lowest in over 100 years According to Statistics Finland’s statistics on the population structure there were 888,323 persons aged under 15 in Finland’s population at the end of 2009. The number is the lowest since 1895. The size of the population under the age of 15 has been decreasing continuously since 1994. At the end of 1977, there were still one million persons aged under 15 in the Finnish population. The size of the population under the age of 15 was at its largest in 1959 when it was 1.35 million. Number of persons aged under 15 in Finland’s population in 1875–2009 On 31 December 2009, the total population of Finland was 5,351,427 in which 2,625,067 were men and 2,726,360 women. In the course of 2009, Finland’s population grew by 25,113 persons. For the third successive year migration gain from abroad contributed more to the increase of population than natural growth. During 2009, the number of persons aged 65 and over in the population increased by good 18,000 and totalled 910,441 at the end of 2009. The largest age cohort in Finland’s population was persons born in 1948. At the end of 2009, they numbered 82,738. Persons over 100 years of age numbered 566, of whom 82 were men and 484 women. Demographic dependency ratio highest in Etelä-Savo and lowest in Uusimaa The demographic dependency ratio, that is the number of under 15 and over 65-year-olds per 100 working age persons was 50.6 at the end of 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispersal and Acclimatization of the Muskrat, Ondatra Zibethicus (L.), in Finland
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Other Publications in Wildlife Management for 1960 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland Atso Artimo Suomen Riistanhoito-Saatio (Finnish Game Foundation) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Artimo, Atso, "The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland" (1960). Other Publications in Wildlife Management. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications in Wildlife Management by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. R I 1ST A TIE T L .~1 U ( K A I S U J A ,>""'liSt I " e'e 'I >~ ~··21' \. • ; I .. '. .' . .,~., . <)/ ." , ., Thedi$perscdQnd.a~C:li"'dti~otlin. of ,the , , :n~skret, Ond~trq ~ib.t~i~',{(.h in. Firtland , 8y: ATSO ARTIMO . RllSTATIETEELLISljX JULKAISUJA PAPERS ON GAME RESEARCH 21 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (l.), in Finland By ATSO ARTIMO Helsinki 1960 SUOMEN FIN LANDS R I 1ST A N HOI T O-S A A T I b ] AK TV ARDSSTI FTELSE Riistantutkimuslaitos Viltforskningsinstitutet Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsingfors, Unionsg. 45 B FINNISH GAME FOUNDATION Game Research Institute Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsinki 1960 . K. F. Puromichen Kirjapaino O.-Y. The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland By Atso Artimo CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating the Ecosystem Services of the Kokemäenjoki River Valley Into Land Use Planning
    Integrating the ecosystem services of the Kokemäenjoki river valley into land use planning SUSTAINBALTIC (CB354) 15 OCTOBER 2018 This plan was prepared as a part of SustainBaltic project (ICZM Plans for Council of Satakunta, Estonian University of Applied Sciences (Eesti Sustaining Coastal and Marine Human-ecological Networks in the Baltic Maaülikool) and the University of Tallinn (Tallinna Ülikool). SustainBaltic is Region, CB354). Project enhances the share of the managed coastal funded by EU Interreg Central Baltic Programme 2014−2020. The overall networks in the Central Baltic area by the cross-border preparation of the budget of the project is 1.3 million Euros, of which 1.023.000 Euros is granted ICZM plans for four case areas in Estonia and Finland. The lead partner in via European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). updated completed the project is the Department of Geography and Geology in the University ICZM plans can be downloaded from the websites of the partner on Turku. Other project partners are Finnish Environmental Institute, Regional organizations and at the http://www.utu.fi/SustainBaltic. Foreword In 2016–2018, the Regional Council of Satakunta took part in the to current planning practices in Finland. SustainBaltic project (ICZM Plans for Sustaining Coastal and Marine The case plan was created in collaboration between the Regional Human-ecological Networks in the Baltic Region, CB354) funded by Council of Satakunta, the Finnish Environment Institute and the the Interreg Central Baltic 2014–2020 programme, the goal of which is University of Turku’s Department of Geography and Geology. This to promote the planning of the sustainable management and use of report was prepared by Project Planner Asko Ijäs, M.Sc., from the coastal zones in the northern Baltic Sea region.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate Concerning the Early Transport Infrastructure in the Sámi Area of Finnish Lapland
    DEBATE CONCERNING THE EARLY TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IN TEH SÁMI AREA OF FINNISH LAPLAND RITVA KYLLI AND JUHA SAUNAVAARA | Pages 85– 105 85 Debate concerning the early transport infrastructure in the Sámi area of Finnish Lapland RITVA KYLLI, University lecturer, History, Culture and Communication Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu, Finland Corresponding author: email: [email protected] JUHA SAUNAVAARA, Assistant Professor, Arctic Research Center, Hokkaido University, Japan, ABSTRACT Tis article examines early Arctic transport infrastructure, especially roads, in the Sámi area of Finnish Lapland during the interwar period. Te modernisation process accelerated the utilisation of northern natural resources, and the frst roads in northernmost Finland also facilitated mining industry and logging sites. In the research concentrating on infrastructure, indigenous peoples have ofen been depic- ted one-dimensionally as victims and forces resisting development. While this study introduces the views of various stakeholders, it also emphasises the importance of understanding indigenous peoples as active agents, some of whom actively lobbied for plans to build roads. While the Sámi resistance to roads referred to, for example, their ability to damage and erode the traditional way of Sámi community life, the supporters underlined the economic possibilities and other benefts to be gained from the improved connectivity. Even though the vocabulary of the 1920s and 1930s difers from today’s language use, many of the ideas which have been discussed more recently – such as remoteness as a potential asset and the value of being disconnected – were already present in the debates of the beginning of the twentieth century. Keywords: indigenous peoples, Lapland, transport infrastructure, roads, Sámi BARENTS STUDIES: Neo-liberalism and sustainable development in the Barents region: A community perspective 86 VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • W Ater Billing Agreements Work Invoicing Surveying, Planning and Design
    A research project supported by the European Commission FP5: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Developmen t www.watertime.org Key Action 4: City of Tomorrow and Cultural Heritage Thematic Priority 4.1.2: Improving the quality of urban li fe watertime@ watertime.org Contract No: EVK4-2002-0095 D22: WaterTim e case study - Häm eenlinna, Finland Dr Jarmo J. Hukka and Dr Osmo T. Seppälä1 Institute of Environmental Engineering and Biotechnology Tampere University of Technology, Finland 31st January 2005 One of 29 WaterTime case studies on decision-making on water systems Watertime case studies Estonia: Tallinn Finland: Tampere, Hämeenlinna France: Grenoble Germany: Berlin, Munich Hungary: Budapest, Debrecen, Szeged Italy: Arezzo, Bologna, Milan, Rome Lithuania: Kaunas, Vilnius Netherlands: Rotterdam Poland: Gdansk, Lodz, Warsaw Romania: Bucharest, Timisoara Spain: Cordoba, Madrid, Palma de Mallorca, Gran Canaria Sweden: Stockholm UK: Cardiff, Edinburgh, Leeds www.watertime.org 1 Contacts: Dr. Jarmo Hukka - jarmo.hukka@ tut.fi; Dr Osmo T. Seppälä - osmo.seppala@ plancenter.fi WaterTime partners: PSIRU, Business School, University of Greenwich, UK ERL, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain Institute of Environmental Engineering and Biotechnology (IEEB), Tampere University of Technology, Finland International Water Affairs, Hamburg, Germany Eötvös József College, Hungary Coordinator: PSIRU, Business School, University of Greenwich, Park Row, London SE10 9LS, U.K. www.watertime.org Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 CITY AND REGION BACKGROUND
    [Show full text]
  • SVT XXIX C : L
    SVT XXIX C : l 041 kieli fînswefre 100 tekijä 245 nimeke Kieltolakiäänestys vuonna 1931 246 rinnakkaisn. swe Förbudsomröstningen år 1931 246 rinnakkaisn. fre Votation populaire sur la prohibition en 1931 260 julk. Helsinki : Tilastollinen päätoimisto, 1932 440 sarja Suomen virallinen tilasto : 29 : l 598 huom. svt 740 muu nimeket. Vaalitilasto = Valstatistik 650 svt aihealue Vaalit - Val - Elections 650 asiasanat 650 tietov. 1931 651 alue Suomi - Finland SUOMEN VIRALLINEN TILASTO - FINLANDS OFFICIELLA STATISTIK XXIX VAALITILASTO C l KIELTOLAKIÄÄNESTYS VUONNA 1931 XXIX VALSTATISTIK C l FÖRBUDSOMRÖSTNINGEN ÅR 1931 COTATION POPULAIRE SUR LA PROHIBITION EN 1931 HELSINKI 1932 HELSINGFORS SUOMEN VIRALLINEN TILASTO - FINLANDS OFFICIELLA STATISTIK XXIX VAALITILASTO C l KIELTOLAKIAÄNESTYS VUONNA 1931 XXIX VALSTATISTIK C l HELSINKI 1932 HELSINGFORS VALTIONEUVOSTON KIRJAPAINO - STATSRÅDETS TRYCKERI Alkusanat. Förord. Täten saatetaan julkisuuteen joulukuun Härmed bringas till offentligheten sta- 29 ja 30 p:nä v. 1931 toimitetusta kielto- tistiken över förbudsomröstningen den 29 lakiäänestyksestä tehty tilasto. Julkaisun och 30 december 1931. Utarbetandet av laatimisesta on lähinnä huolehtinut allekir- publikationen har närmast handhafts av joittanut Järvinen. undertecknad Järvinen. Helsingissä, Tilastollisessa päätoimistossa, Helsingfors, å Statistiska centralbyrån, toukokuussa 1932. i maj 1932. Martti Kovero. G. Modeen. M. Järvinen. SISÄLLYS. INNEHÅLL. Teksti. Text. Siv. Sid. Johdanto 5 Inledning 5 1. Äänioikeutetut 5 1. Eöstberättigade 5 2. Osanotto äänestykseen 6 2. Deltagandet i omröstningen 6 3. Äänestyksen tulos 9 3. Eesultatet av omröstningen 9 Tauluja. Tabeller. Kieltolakiäänestys joulukuun 29 ja 30 p:nä Förbudsomröstningen den 29 och 30 december 1931, kunnittain 1931, kommunvis TABLE DES MATIÈRES. Texte. Tableaux. Page Page Introduction 5 Votation populaire sur la prohibition au 29 et Électeurs inscrits 5 30 décembre 1931, par communes 1 Votants 6 Bésultats de la votation 9 Johdanto.
    [Show full text]
  • District 107 F.Pdf
    Club Health Assessment for District 107 F through December 2020 Status Membership Reports Finance LCIF Current YTD YTD YTD YTD Member Avg. length Months Yrs. Since Months Donations Member Members Members Net Net Count 12 of service Since Last President Vice Since Last for current Club Club Charter Count Added Dropped Growth Growth% Months for dropped Last Officer Rotation President Activity Account Fiscal Number Name Date Ago members MMR *** Report Reported Report *** Balance Year **** Number of times If below If net loss If no When Number Notes the If no report on status quo 15 is greater report in 3 more than of officers thatin 12 months within last members than 20% months one year repeat do not haveappears in two years appears appears appears in appears in terms an active red Clubs more than two years old M,MC,SC 20649 ÄHTÄRI 03/31/1965 Active 10 0 0 0 0.00% 10 1 IP 0 32745 ÄHTÄRI/OULUVESI 09/22/1976 Active 24 0 0 0 0.00% 25 1 N 0 20599 ALAHÄRMÄ 10/11/1961 Active 31 0 0 0 0.00% 31 1 N 6 MC,SC 20650 ALAJÄRVI/JÄRVISEUTU 02/26/1960 Active 34 0 0 0 0.00% 34 0 N 0 VP,MC,SC 20651 ALAVUS 03/06/1964 Active 16 0 0 0 0.00% 17 0 2 9 104719 ALAVUS/KUULATTARET 02/11/2009 Active 16 1 2 -1 -5.88% 20 5 1 N 3 M,MC,SC 36146 ALAVUS/SALMI 10/16/1978 Active 20 0 0 0 0.00% 21 1 N 19 MC,SC 20597 EVIJÄRVI 10/17/1963 Active 35 0 0 0 0.00% 38 0 N 0 MC,SC 20600 ILMAJOKI 02/25/1964 Active 26 1 0 1 4.00% 27 1 N 3 44303 ILMAJOKI/ILKKA 10/31/1984 Active 35 1 0 1 2.94% 34 0 N 0 $96.15 M,MC,SC 67723 ILMAJOKI/VILJAT 04/11/2003 Active 23 1 1 0 0.00% 21 13 1 N 2 MC 20601
    [Show full text]
  • Triangular-Shaped Landforms Reveal Subglacial Drainage Routes in SW 2 Finland
    1 1 Triangular-shaped Landforms Reveal Subglacial Drainage Routes in SW 2 Finland 3 Mäkinen, J.a, *, Kajuutti, K.a, Palmu, J.-P.b, Ojala, A.b and Ahokangas, E.a 4 a Department of Geography and geology, University of Turku FI-20014 Turku, Finland. 5 b Geological Survey of Finland, P.O. Box 96 (Betonimiehenkuja 4) FI-02151 Espoo, Finland. 6 * corresponding author ([email protected]). 7 8 ABSTRACT 9 The aim of this study is to present the first evidence of triangular-shaped till landforms and related erosional 10 features indicative of subglacial drainage within the ice stream bed of the Scandinavian ice sheet in Finland. 11 Previously unidentified grouped patterns of Quaternary deposits with triangular landforms can be recognized from 12 LiDAR-based DEMs. The triangular landforms occur as segments within geomorphologically distinguishable 13 routes that are associated with eskers. The morphological and sedimentological characteristics as well as the 14 distribution of the triangular landforms are interpreted to involve the creep of saturated deforming till, flow and 15 pressure fluctuations of subglacial meltwater associated with meltwater erosion. There are no existing models for 16 the formation of this kind of large-scale drainage systems, but we claim that they represent an efficient drainage 17 system for subglacial meltwater transfer under high pressure conditions. Our hypothesis is that the routed, large- 18 scale subglacial drainage systems described herein form a continuum between channelized (eskers) and more 19 widely spread small-scale distributed subglacial drainage. Moreover, the transition from the conduit dominated 20 drainage to triangular-shaped subglacial landforms takes place about 50-60 km from the ice margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Koko Tutkimusalue
    5.10 Koko tutkimusalue Soranottoalueita rajattiin yhteensä 367 ja niiden yhteispinta-ala oli 613 hehtaaria (taulukko 13). Nämä alueet jaettiin vielä jälkihoidon mukaan omiksi alueiksi, joita oli yhteensä 2. Pohjavesialueiden ulkopuolella kokonaan tai enimmäkseen sijaitsevia soranottoalueita rajattiin kuusi. Osalla ottamisalueista oli myös kalliokiviaineksen ottoa. Kuvassa 139 on esitetty soranottoalueiden jakautuminen eri kokoluokkiin. Yli puolet soranottoalueista oli alle puolen hehtaarin kokoisia, mutta niiden osuus pin- ta-alasta oli noin 6 %. Yli kymmenen hehtaarin kokoisia alueita oli vain muutama prosentti kaikista alueista, mutta niiden osuus pinta-alasta oli noin kolmannes. Taulukko 13. Soranottoalueiden lukumäärä ja pinta-alatiedot koko tutkimusalueelta. Määrä Pinta-ala Keskiarvo Max Min Mediaani 367 kpl 613,19 ha 1,67 ha 35,95 ha 0,02 ha 0,40 ha a) b) 4 % 3 % 6 % 14 % 15 % Kokoluokka (ha) 35 % < 0,5 0,5 - 2 2 - 5 54 % 5 -10 > 10 25 % 28 % 16 % Kuva 139. Eri kokoluokkaa olevien soranottoalueiden osuudet ottamisalueiden a) lukumäärästä ja b) pinta-alasta. Maakuntakaavaan merkittyjä soran- ja hiekanoton aluevarauksia (EOh) oli tutki- musalueella yhteensä 23 kappaletta ja niiden pinta-ala oli 0 hehtaaria. EOh -alueet sijaitsivat pääasiassa pohjavesialueilla. Eniten EOh -alueita oli Tammelassa (10 kpl, 18 ha) ja Hattulassa ( kpl, 190 ha). Hämeenlinnassa ja Ypäjällä niitä ei ollut yhtään. Muissa kunnissa EOh-alueita oli 1–3 kpl ja niiden pinta-ala oli 10–80 ha. Lähes kaikilla EOh -alueilla oli tai oli ollut soranottotoimintaa. Soranottoalueiden jälkihoitoluokkien osuudet ottamisalueista on esitetty kuvassa 10 ja kunnostustarveluokkien osuudet kuvassa 11. Lukumäärän mukaan suurin osa soranottoalueista oli jälkihoitamattomia. Jälkihoitoluokkien pinta-aloja vertailtaessa toiminnassa olevien alueiden osuus on kuitenkin suurin.
    [Show full text]