Quick viewing(Text Mode)

The Nationalisation of Cultural Space on the Example of the Guča Trumpet

The Nationalisation of Cultural Space on the Example of the Guča Trumpet

CEU eTD Collection

More

than one ? Thenationalis Serbia? than one the example of the Guča trumpet festival trumpet Guča the of the example In requirements fulfilment ofthe partial Advisor Nationalism Studies ProgramNationalism Studies Central European University Professor Florian Bieber Budapest, Hungary s Ralf Grabuschnig : Professor Anton Pelinka : Professor Anton Master of Arts s ubmitted to ubmitted 2015 and by

ation ation

for

the degreeof of cultural space space of cultural

on on

CEU eTD Collection nationalget belongingand and ‘Serbness’ possibly reinterpreted reinforced. colouring reputation ofthe festival. these resonatetheirata point notions accounts. taken results in The findings are connotations basedIn onperceptions ofthe ‘FirstSerbia’. thesecondpart how itis overtwodecades.discussions the past ofwhatvisions Serbia means asa a forum isolatethe to discursive posts conceptSerbias’, of‘Two ofthe thedivision country into top nationalism. Using qualitative answer South and in festival biggestmusic investigatesThis thesis prominence the the Guča of Abstract

‘First’, - down and bott to traditional routinely has additiona has why

then contrasted withthe experienc then contrasted so many people inSerbiaso many people om applied tothe trumpetapplied festival Guča, in attaching - nationalist anda nationalist - up. The first part presents l potential implications in in potential implications the sensel that the event B esides showingtheinfluencediscourse ofthe research methods, I investigate perspectives:research two from the methods, issue state and state - Eastern ,

‘Second’, I

will will strongly nation) show e of thefestival’s tosee visitors, e inhowfar of i

modern

discourse analyse discourse connect

how self , which

festival, an assembly ofan trumpetfestival, assemblyplayers in Serbian public discourse. ItgivesSerbian public discourse. an - European this festivalthis Serbian with has taken - explaining thi s of newspaper articless ofnewspaper and part (representingpart two -

for to the event place inSerbian public - granted nationalistgranted , this national , this is also

s concepts is of thisthesis of

a placewhere national ,

and , these

CEU eTD Collection Bibliography Conclusion Chapter3: T Chapter2: T Chapter1: T Introduction Table of contents Methodological framework Everyday ethnicity Festivals, (World) Music and ethno Discursiveconstruction of thenation Chapter summary Perceptions ofparticipants the Nationalisation theof festival Serb Music, festivals and national meaning Chapter summary discursiveThe construction of two Serbias Orientalism and emergenceThe aof Second Serbia Commercialisation and the logic Worldof Folklorisation Gučaa form as pilgrimageof Festivals, publicevents and identity Music and identity Discoursein web forums Areas theof TwoSerbias discourse Newspaperdiscourse ian brass andmusic thefestival in Guča

...... he national colouring of the Guča trumpetfestival wo or more Serbias heoretical framework and methodology

......

...... Balkanism

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

- ...... marketing ......

......

......

......

......

...... Music

...... ii ......

......

......

......

70 66 64 58 56 54 51 49 47 46 45 44 43 40 37 35 30 29 27 25 23 17 14 11 .

7 7 1

CEU eTD Collection domest therefore isfarthe region it from knownallwhile being andbeyond, over uncontroversial increasingly festival and Europe theGuča also is elsewhere.Today trumpet from Western furthermore (population 2,000)inthe south music eventsdrawing visitors Europe, in million tothetiny more a thanhalf Gučatown of past decades, two this intellectual asinthe circlesas broader well is thetrumpet festival publicGuča. in the Over One manifestation ofthis areas Serbiannotablyalso most thecultur publiclife, of widely very Serbian can This muchspecifictothe context. also beseenthatt inthe fact immense influence generalisatiand thisdiscursiveandits omnipresencedistinction of conservative of a acourse parts phenomenon society isof not democracy. rooted in tradition andnati describing two more clearly orless definedvisions developed intoa tothe Miloševićopposition regime,general, in and inYugoslavia thewars nationalism it Serbian intellectual originally While refer debate. to used to Inearly the 1990s, Introduction ically. shared

do not come onlydo notcome fr While such aWhile between blackwhite differentiation and liberal themore andmore

distinction is not at not all is distinction

broader a about discourse aso originally small categor discursive distinction onalism, theother inEuropeanis - west om Serbia and the neighbouring andcountries the om Serbia anybut more y. A - fter the regime change of 2000, the distinction hardened,fter changeregime of2000, the thedistinction Serbian region of Dragačevo each year. ofDragačevo TheseSerbianeach visitors region limited topoliticslimited regional - called ‘S 1

festival grew biggest intooneoffestival the folk

often in comingboth upindiscussions econd for(the a‘F Serbia, future one any more, al sphere. Serbia’( ation, m the quite

part of Serbian societypart of Serbian in Druga Srbija

but extends into many into extends otherbut odernis unique to Serbia, the unique ation and ation ) appeared in oday this irst Serbia’) ons is ons is soon

CEU eTD Collection Etnoantropološki Problemi Etnoantropološki Lukić Miroslava (2011); Muzič Etnicizacija Ljudi: Običnih Srbiji,” USavremenoj Identiteta 1 discursive battle. from the I arguewill of the thattheperception theexperiencesterms in andhowreflects this made questions, influential tothe overall when comes it re attract somenationalistically minded people? festival indeed happening a event nationalist ratheran happens many just orlike to others that by themajority clearly aother to significant hand,young thecrowd consists of part and Serbs the counterfeits war ofSerbian criminalsare omnipresent glance, symbols as nationalistic Yet, it whenfestival, visiting the for unquestioned this granted happens thatitselfjust in the festival to T mentioned Serbia. andis abackward, nationalist happening, traditionalist a European unworthy modern of Quite onthe contrary,

As has been done in much literature this far e.g.: e.g.: far this literature much in done been As has wo Serbias It seems broader

in this thesis I thesis in this seek toanalys opposition to opposition the EXIT rock

discourse, while it is unclearwhile itis discourse, why this

that the differingGučathat theon (and opinions festival esp Two Serbias The music playedThe at music the event - Krstanović, “The Festival Order: Music Stages of Power and Pleasure?,” Pleasure?,” and Power of Stages Music Order: “The Festival Krstanović,

. 1

it facesit from immensegroups opposition society, diverse in claiming it

3, no. 3 (2008): 129 3 (2008):3, no. did notcome forreasons. How do suchdid ke Tradicije Na Primeru Sabora U Guči.,” UGuči.,” Sabora Primeru Na ke Tradicije Kultura

discourse such as is , no. 116 no. ,

difficult

festival as a nationalist eventa festival for as e –

and pop flags, militaryeven costumes and T 43. – – why putation of the event? of theevent? putation 117 (2007): 98 117 (2007):

the festivalthe

Marina Simić, “EXIT U Evropu: Popularna Muzika I Politike Politike I Muzika Popularna UEvropu: “EXIT Simić, Marina

not to agree againstat it first with the accusations

And i and 2

be a nationalistic event, leaving thereasons on theother handon festival in Novi in festival how is thecase, f so:why minority thenisthis so

by participants its – being

122; Waldemar Kuligowski, “Nacionalizam “Nacionalizam Kuligowski, Waldemar 122; the festival innational coloured is

on the streets of the town on thestreets ofthe

only one of the arenas ofthe one only Anthropology Magazine Anthropology

es this fit together? Is es fittogether? this this and one cannot takecannot and for one To giveanswer an tothese

Sad) followthe lines ofthe , whilenaturally being the .

a major parta derives major other ecially its -

Shirt Europeanswho s showing

11, no. 1 no. 11, frequently in . Onthe

this this

CEU eTD Collection Nationalism in a Globalising Wor Globalising a in Nationalism Ecstatic of Significance ofthe Understanding an Towards Emotion?’. Surplus of “‘Carnivals Skey, Michael Tim Edensor, 3 Wodak, Ruth 2 the discursive ofthe construction nation playroleresearch. afor Using crucial a my them as undertaking C colouring i and howexactly,a seemingly a cultural banal like event trumpet festiva top research,existing twoperspectives combining everyday belonging national natureof scholarlyWhile onthe discursive of worksconstruction national both meaning national belongingarereinforced. experience whether toanswer ornot can Guča then tu considerationstop about the such politicalas aswell economicand as historical logic c established I am going toconsolidate analys which iswhy are methods notgoingapplied thesis. musicological inthis tobe main motivati

E.g : E.g. hapter 1 - .: down and a bottom Michael Billig, Billig, Michael Jon E. Fox and Cynthia Miller Cynthia and Fox Jon E. ing the discourse in Serbia’s main newspapers and web portals over the p Serbia’s and mainportals web over newspapers thediscoursein ing rn tothemicro andanalyse nationalis level this how

will will n its reputation and appearance reputation n its what and

National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life Everyday Cultureand Popular Identity, National The Discursive Construction of National Identity National of Construction DiscursiveThe (by adherents ofa(by adherents Second Serbia) . Mytheoretical basis on for most visitors set to out Banal Nationalism Banal

- up approach. By doing this, the present thesis aims to explain why approach.thepresenttoexplain Byup aims thesis this, doing introduce thetheoretical my ld,” ld,” - down construction nationalI colouring of as astarting point, will

claim - Idriss, “Everyday Nationhood,” Nationhood,” “Everyday Idriss, Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism and Ethnicity in Studies

(London: SAGE (London: consists ofthreeconsists to attendthe

that the nationalist colouringthat thenationalist discursively ismainly 3

exist, this this thesisexist, adds *** , while , while , 1995); 1995); ,

3 commonly be seenbe festival

and methodological big

(Edinburgh: Edinburgh University 2009). , Edinburgh (Edinburgh: further

also

, clusters of literature. Firstly, literature. on clusters of works also

(Oxford; New York: Berg Publishers, 2002); Publishers,2002); Berg York: New (Oxford; does not Ethnicities

not neglecting other perspectives separated in the existing literature:existing inthe a separated ircumstances. Taking these ation reflectspeople’s in

as a placewhereas of notions a implications this may this implications have. a different approach

6, no. 2 (2006): no. 143 6, playa significant role inthis,

8, no. 4 (2008): no. 8, 536 framework this for l take s –

Instead, b on nationalist 2 61.

ast few years,ast few and the to the – 63;

y

CEU eTD Collection International Journal of Cultural Policy Cultural of Journal International Reader Worldin Music,” through ‘Local’ the Redefining “On Guilbault, Iocelyne Difference,” for Search the and Music “World Jo Haynes, JeanComaroff, and Comaroff L. John Press, 2000); California 4 stands for modernis Serbia broad Startingregimechange from the marking thespa a todistancethepolicies political regime statement,group of this from used theMilošević and asgroup intellectuals pronounced ofopposition a theearly in by 1990swas not entirely Serbiana phenom unique being in intellectual circles amongstgeneral and public the discourse construction of (national)meaningand role its inthe colouring of C devoted to mundane constructioni of commercialis as hasbeenbywell established with the logicMusic and dealing scholars of World these dynamics economic are manifold, interests clearly play a r dominating comprises literatureguiding dynamics onother this bas Jelena Gligorijević, “World Music Festivals and Tourism: A Case Study of Serbia’s Guca Trumpet Festival,” Festival,” Trumpet Guca Serbia’s of Study A Case Tourism: and Festivals Music “World Gligorijević, Jelena

Such as: Such hapter 2 is, Igoingis, am toanalys

discourse isfinallyhow this and and tomusic festivals. show applied Thesecondcluster

set of ideological positions concerningset positions ofideological pl Serbia’s

(New York: Routledge, 2006); York: Routledge, (New came isolationismand overall whileth tosignifynationalism, backwardness, Simon Frith, “The Discourse of World Music,” in in Music,” World of Discourse “The Simon Frith,

in question is the notionofTwo is in question Serbias

presents thetop an overview of thean methodsused overviewof ation of culture ce ofanother,ce ation

, cosmopolitanism and cosmopolitanism Europeanis, dentity andethnicity everyday - e the Two eSerbias the down . 4

non T

Ethnicity, Inc. Ethnicity, he lastcluster of literature

20, no. 2 (2012): no. 139 20, in October 2000, the idea ofain October2000, analysis - nationalist, open

of theissue

(Chicago: University of (Chicago: University enon

throughout this discourse, identifyimportantdiscourse, themost areas of 4 music

Ethnicities . While theoriginalWhile a. idea S of Western Music and Its Others Its and Music Western , which Serbia, isveryin both muchpresent – 54. - minded , while,as hasbeen mentionedalready, s

festivalsevents. and cultural While

concerned ace inthe world, whereas .

5, no. 3 (2005): no. 365 5, The remainder of chapterremainder ofThe be 1will

finally, ation. As it must be tothe must obvious ation. Asit

Serbia was ,this to thesis. Ethnomusicology: A Contemporary Contemporary A Ethnomusicology:

Chicago Press, 2009); Press, Chicago Two Serbias –

cultural space.cultural main The contains works onthecontains

the discursive the discursive –

(Berkeley: University of of University (Berkeley: 85;

first andforemost ole in this respect,ole inthis developed intoa

econd Serbia shift

the First the the e S

later on. econd

CEU eTD Collection question in appearance of Guča, 3 Chapter finally developed inthefirst place, yearsover topic.Thereby,this the past on 15 chapter anewspaperanalysis discoursearticles ofand be discussion on 2will internet based and finally In or festivals EXIT. twoSerbias: representing these and Guča rock and p Turbofolk stretchingrealm,cultural especiallywhere tothe music, folk theSerbian the more important ones coope closer cooperation or withthe EUvs.Russia, thediscussionsconcerning stronger tieswith political debates offought: European thenoughties were vs.holding integration ontoKosovo, sy Yet even these though types are ideal overtlyand would biased nopolitician seen inthe exclusivelywith the first negativeterms one. connected reader byvisions now,boththese mpathis der t ration with the International Tribunalration Criminal for withthe toname theformer Yugoslavia, contributed tothe colouringcontributed Guča innationalterms. of s to answer why particula this to answer o exem

into perspinto ed ofa withthe ideas started tobe op as belongingop tothe S and subchapters its

show the wide acceptance of the concept ofTwo acceptance the Serbiasconcept wide oftheshow

and how this reflectsand howthis theexperiences in plify the discourse plify the inquestion, ective,some theoretical thechapter opens and a with considerations

clearly i . Throughoutthe . that period, was then appliedwas and tomusic festivals then then dentified toth as belonging F ir were adherentsa definedby of econd. This distinction was specific thenextended totwo econd. Thisdistinction st Serbia take themicro considerationsto these r event is soclearlyr event is nationalis , it isalongthese, it I

5 will will

analys make discourse e the positions taken positions bye the actors different made by

clear how discour peculiar this

e F exact irst Serbia

its participants its also Second Serbi fault lines thatmuch ofthe ed , and how this process this , and how

, broadened further,broadened the analytical part of

both in reputation and both

- and Western and

pop va pop level, the caselevel, study ever . Toput a , as can, as be riety have openlyhave - style these

se only

CEU eTD Collection is happening. place where thena everydayIethnicity, will it showhowwill and par towhichextent asvisitors well as organis thendealThe3 will chapter final t part with of one hand, whilebecoming and more nation traditional changed marketing andtime chapter wit deals nationalism and,toacertain extent, strongest,also thatperiod Guča in thatthefestival in was with it became associated 1990s, since historicalthe early overviewfrom 1960s to questions ofethnicity,to questions and Using authenticitymusic. thetheoretical of framework significantly more strongly , which , ,

while this waswhile this of wars thetime theYugoslav nationalist when rhetoric was h istheprocesscommercialis of are, broadly by characterised speaking, tional community getscommunity andtional createdreinforcedwayand inwhat in the lasttwodecades, opening uptoaninternationalin the audience onthe

after 2000. by the Driven ers and musicians. finally

also discuss

with the ticipa to

today nts mirrornationalis this Based

Milošević *** howthe festivaland Guča canas in seenif a be 6 he perception ofnationalis this

ation takingation place at

. A period of in . special economic

on interview data and observation notes, Ion interviewand data notes, observation - related appear inits - regime.

a search for authenticity,a for thefestival search

logic of World Music oflogic World

Another important Another important ation and howtheyation and relate approximately terest here isthe ance on theother. ed event by

exactly and ethno factor this

the same the same

this this its its -

CEU eTD Collection goes sayingwithout ot that c discourse. Asfortop the and a top groups: in manifold ways aother isnot fixed identities, It awell is used bottom part logic of Music World factorscolouring inthe crucially national most Guča festival, onthe theories economic ofthe discursive thecluster construction subsumes nation. The literature onadditional of second down perspective inthe secondof provided literature thethesis, thatis, chapter onthe structured into According to Theoretical framework and methodology Chapter 1 ommunity can get invoked. While Iommunityget can invoked. While discursive focus construction will on in I.

then

throughout Discursive construction of the nation of the Discursive construction - up analys a bottom - consists ofliteratureconsists ethnicity oneveryday and serve will down one, through down one, - accepted

the four

this thesis. this - . Very. broadly speaking, is provided inchapterfollowed methodologyis provided by apart three, final onthe clusters up p

parts. Thethe theoreticalparts. first part of for consists thetop background notion

rocess throughrocess and ethno and - down process, are there and her means important andinfluential. beas can just

in

state unit perspectives contemporary - marketing,

in the social world but policies, nation building attemptspolicies, nation byelites everyday experience, encounters,

these discussed inthe introduction discussed

and of festivalsgatherings.and of associal scholarship thatthenation, muchlike scholarship 7

ways

therefore

cancategoris be

instead

multiple constructed ona daily basis

as thebackbone ofthe

ways in which aways national in ed into two major two ed into choices , this chapterthis is , this

and public

and soforth,

The third third The thesis, it thesis, it ethnic -

or

CEU eTD Collection 6 5 reception a on of discourse such etWodak al., construction national of divergentnotions identityI have, inSerbia. Moreover, questions are similar 19 in order toanalys range(such political speeches, ofsourcesas groups as focus an themedia well as identity’ detailal. their by in widely‘Theof etnationalcitedconstruction Wodak Ruth discursive book The nati musical programme other thee hand,role play ain cananalys be processes.nation can the Choosing The remaining byand three categories Fox Miller discussed apply ofwill competi tothe construction intheeverydaydiscursive processes involved (re thesis. Talking ‘performing ‘consuming and Many thenation’ thenation’. ofthe four ways distinct analys in whichtheconstructed nation is onan basis, bothtop everyday In‘Everyday nationhood’

Wodak, Wodak, Miller and Fox 90s. This framework90s. This bewill crucial to onalis discursive The Discursive Construction of National Identity National of Construction DiscursiveThe . 6 ed intheir meaning and marketing.

Therein - ed as a ed as Idriss, “Eve Idriss, analys

top about the nation about the e the discursive ofe construction modern the identity Austrian national inthe , the - down construction ofdown thenation

ed media discussionsanded media and the setting (food, drinks, or merchandise settingand drinks, the (food,

nationally colouredchoice. Performingconsuming onthe and thenation,

and authors apply authors methodof the ryday Nationhood.” ryday ed intheir paperare ‘choosing ‘talking about the nation’, thenation’, I , 5 also

John Fox and Fox CynthiaJohn Miller

xperiences made by participantsxperiences by atthe festival, made

, possiblya top both aim the

directly

to identifydiscursive the processes thebehind micro level.

ng ofnationalthe case versions identitySerbia. in of the present be applied tothe Guča applied be festival,

conducted interviews in order to interviewsconducted inorder 8

.

- )construction ofI national which identity, - in particular C

down and bottom research ritical - Idrissmany touchupon ofthe Discourse A - Idriss bottom describe since has been discussed ingreathas discussed been - se apply directlyse to ) down and bottom down and

are, as I show, will are, as

many of the many - up action, nalysis ona wide nalysis

since visiting it as investigate

research both the

d interviews) describes the similarly to - - up u this p. The ways

the the

CEU eTD Collection 9 19 , Plato, 8 7 ismore Simić and electronic music such festivalcorresponding as and music Gučafor theExit folk manifestations, style thatt rock. popand She shows nationalis discourse on provided by Marina Simić Another important touching article upon behind its appl thoughtsČolović’s andillustration backgroundI tothe asandiscourses inquestion, al will mythological atthat time contexts this 1980s and early at whathecalls the 1990s, pointing trend ‘Folklo of Ratnika which marks two thediscursive into beginning ofthedistinction creation so of the significance collectionČolović’s of essays scholarly are Serbia relevant works to from As for thespecific discou

Ivan Čolović,Ivan Simić, u “EXIT in: Firstintroduced trend yfolkloris thenotionof , he gives insight valuable

ation ofComposed Folk Newly M with the fact that present . Čolović was amongst was . Čolović themost Bordell der Krieger: Folklore, Politik u Politik Folklore, Krieger: der Bordell

Evropu.” Two Serbias Two Serbias 92).

concernedwith the musicitselfand related than questioning phenomena, rather

- Ivan Čolović and Mimica Aljoša, Aljoša, Mimica and Čolović Ivan called Second Serbia called national colouring.

. This article overlaps for a good. Thisarticleparta with overlaps for

rse thenotionofTwo inquestion, Serbias . from down tothe cultural politics dis sphere, 9 politicalall sortsofother speecheswereand eventsframed in

ation tothe Guča tounveil some itself ofthe festival dynamics In her paper

‘Bordel ratnika’ ‘Bordel

into the national discourses present in Serbia inthelate discourses thenational Serbia into presentin in order to he discoursemusic butalso reaches downnotonly to

as a form of political opposition in of in a political formopposition asthe early 1990s ‘ the discursive construction of T the discursive EXIT uEvropu’ nd Krieg nd this usic influential Druga Srbija, Zbornik Tekstova Zbornik Srbija, Druga

create unitycreate authenticity.Besides and using 9

(Warrior’s B

undertaking. First and foremost, Ivanundertaking. foremost, First and (NCFM) (NCFM) , vol. 78 (Osnabrück: fibre, 1994). (Osnabrück: vol. 78 ,

Serb

in the 1990s as opposed toWestern in the 1990sas opposed (EXIT to Europe), she (EXIT toEurope), ian intellectuals involved in involved ian intellectuals rothel) the aims thesis ofthis and 7 , a number of and, a scholars number

ris is of outmost is ofoutmost

moreIn Serbias.

ation’. (: Beogradski krug, krug, Beogradski (Belgrade: cussing the wo Serbias is wo

He exemplifies

for rock, follows , while Bordel

the

pop the , so 8

CEU eTD Collection 10 These be will inthe introducedfollowing section. the Guča keep alsoimportant to is non it other, festival, by Guča specifically,tookonanational festival conceptions provided colouring, following the First, Second or T construction, namely the analys nation and national Building oftheoretical framework onthis construction literature onthediscursive of the source active inthese discussio that haveSerbian around been intellectual in circles overviewgivenarticl intheir (modern refers to some Serbia’s mainandthepast a newspapers radio over station Serbia) articleIvana by TamaraandIn ‘ Petrović Spasić. A final th contribution to of the discourse soaccurately described inher paper. how and suchfestival whyas public space theGučagetsframed terms as innational aresult

Tamara Petrov this ed in

to the development of the discourse itself in recent years. ofthediscourserecentto the development itselfin , discourse. However, to give a full picture of t discourse. togive a However, of fullpicture 10 - European) Serbia European)

theygivean overvie this

ić and Ivana Spasić, “Varijante “Varijante Spasić, Ivana ić and sort of third wayF sort of between third the

thesis, Ithesis, showawill crucial top hird Serbia). On this basis I Onhird Serbia). basisbe this will and able toargueinturnthe why music identityto the s as as background well

ns. Moreover, ns. itis e analysisSerbian ofthe ina discourse specific recent isprovided creation

andtoday is e isdenotative inseveral ways.

w ona concerning‘T discourse a

of divergent notions ofnational identityof divergent notions ( simil Treće Srbije’,” Srbije’,” Treće will will arly irst (n 10 - also down processdown modern identity in Serbian

Varijante treće Srbije Varijante widely shared

ationalist serve as recently Filozofija i Filozofija he processes involved inthe colouring of

- discursive, perspectives in mind. inmind. discursive, perspectives pecific Serbian discoursetobe fifteen years.fifteen Th

a crucial guideline a crucial I

and also points tothepeoplealso points and - Društvo t shows many ofthe discussions many t shows traditionalist) and S hird Serbia’ as observed hird Serbia’ in

as theformer two

23, no. 3 (2012): 23 3 (2012): no. 23, ’ (Variants ofa(Variants T routinely is

idea

and primary econd . The generally

– called the 44. hird

CEU eTD Collection 11 An especially g and guiding its authenticity of difference notions and are This broadero phenomenon of their original meaning. the payingare public heavy and emphasis difference, onauthenticity industry and ofsouvenirs themarketing places and native many organisationscountries and whole to‘sel neoliberalism diverse thatmotivated Comaroff.Jane how the has authorsit, great been detail call in described in The process overall ethno of internalits logic. broadest World Music thedynamics sense, itis of playa crucial rolerespect. in this manyin play, dynamics possible c construction is it While intrigu enre that is particularly stronglyenre particularly notions thatis connected tothese

Comaroff and Comaroff, Comaroff, and Comaroff II.

Festivals, different fieldsdifferent

only significant accountsignificant subject onthis is 11

- , there are other important aspects and, thereare dynamics other important toconsider. aspects

ing toascribe the nationalistanddiscursive to look reputationfestival ofthe In theyanalyse their book, many dynamics by initiated thelogic of American (World) Music (World)

- many times many

Ethnicity, Inc. Ethnicity, the most prominent examples most being the

- f ethno - run Casinos inthe USA ma

rketing,ethnicity ‘ethnic thesellingcommodification’, of or

In specific case ofGuča,folk music festival the as the a in heavily tothe market adjusted andthereby

learly - marketing is

and ethno and ‘ethno’ . In. process, this allparticipants

the l’ their ethnicl’ theiridentity. Thisselling

- festival’s agents suchasminority triballeaders, agents 11 while the‘authentic’while presented traditions to

naturally - marketing and ethno Simon Frith’sSimon ‘The ofWorld discourse

but it also extends tothe alsoextends but it broader tourism

historical setting and historicaland setting crucial to most musicalOnecrucial genres. tomost present in the field ofmusic asfield well the present in

ethno ‘

- Ethnicity,Inc. however, marketing, which marketing,

- tourism inAfricatourism and other is in the market clearly ’

econom

can take by John L.by and John often Amongst the

g World Mu World uide much of uide much lose much lose ic interests

place in put

sic.

CEU eTD Collection 13 12 further seems draw thefestival’s to appearance from reputation, providing however and without turningpro theevent from a the history arguesfestival, ofthe thatin where applies he t Waldemar Kuligowski ‘ in especially at of the time its folkloris However, marketingthe only isnot at logic dynamic work The inGuča. process contributed theend that in the Guča an festival specifically authenticity, Music search this World for logic behind the authenticitythis oraI observation, lackargue this perceived from ofit.Starting is will it that preservation of ‘authenticSerbian’ regional) cultureand (or muchinternaldiscourse refer dynamicexoticness. This isdefinitely onthe isput Much inGuča asemphasis visible well. the authenticity of relevant onthe market,every similarly toethno of Musicproposition World sotosay, music’

Kuligowski, “Nacionalizam Običnih Ljudi: Ljudi: Običnih “Nacionalizam Kuligowski, Music.” World of Discourse “The Frith, . explanations for this. forexplanations this. 12 ation as described byIvan d Čolović

The forward thatthe main argument put key by Frithsellingword, is theunique - his marketing as phenomenon abroader his easy

dynamic

product, which often goes whichoftenproduct, hand inhandwith afor search difference and

target for opponents N rapid - acionalizam običnih ljudi’ Yugoslavian a festival to Serbian nationalist one,ahe conclusion

artist, producer, event organisartist, producer, event

specificallyGuča after totheKuligowski, festival. discussing

expansion in the 1990s. This process inthe 1990s.This expansion described further is by

significantly Etnicizacija Muzičke Tradicije na Primeru Sabora u Primeru Sabora na Tradicije Muzičke Etnicizacija can

the 1990s a processethnicisthe 1990s of essentially efinitely festival an influence had onthe aswell, 12 of whatof t to the festival’s nationalto colouring.

be

. heyas perceived theFirst Serbia (Nationalismcommon people) ofthe Frith nailed down to nailed down er etc. toconstantlywork has on

argues that in order tostayargues thatin marketing, which ation tookplace,ation

authenticity afore mention

Guči.”

, very

ed , a ,

made made s to , 13

CEU eTD Collection Etnografskog Instituta SANU Instituta Etnografskog 17 16 15 2009). LIT, , Münster: Ritual 14 dominance ofthismusical style intoday’s Serbi trumpet inSerbia music as such,providing some for important input explaining the In dippingwithout thequestion. fullyanother article into EXIT similarly toMarina discussed paper Simić’s end does to give the reasons importance the for festival Serbian of for national inthe which feeling, she Gligorijević connections between nati Lastly generally, ofdiscourses ethno allfollowthelogic thosethree Serbia), and theoriental of the discourse of Marković’s critically an a alsoidentifiedby that Serbian(which onewas Kuligowski), question. Aleksandra Marković A research simila very

Gligorij Ma Aleksandra Miroslava Lukić Miroslava Lukić d traditional, an one,branding oriental as it and Eastern occidental backward, an one, e

- , there and Guča festivals in Serbia,and in Guča festivals alsoa hintingconnect at F i Krstanović, “The Festival Order.” “The Festival Krstanović, m Östlichen m irst Serbia ević, “World Music Festivals and Tourism.” and Festivals Music “World ević, not convincingly provide. Miroslava Lukić Miroslavanot convincinglyprovide. highligh

15 argument is that it islargely thatit is argument co T are

elaborates o wo Serbias rković, “‘Guča i “‘Guča rković, - Krstanović, “ Trubaštva “Politika Krstanović,

also ofother giving anumber tothe publications additional insight

Europa: Studien zur Sozialistischen u Sozialistischen zur Studien Europa: ting the festival’s commercialisting the

(or rather theself

r to Kuligowski’sgives morer to concrete some onthis perspectives

22 (2006): 169 22 (2006): one withhowsupporters onal fe . The described Serbianconcurs as discourse by Marković wit n the links betweenn thelinks commercialis s Guča’: Ideological Transformations of a Music Festival,” in in Festival,” Music a of Transformations Ideological s Guča’:

, 14 eling, commercialis

identifies several distinct discoursesdistinct identifies presentatthefestival: several

- perception of tho perception of – 87.

-

Fol ngruent withthe ngruent

before klor u klor 13 nd Post an (‘traditional’an

ation. One ation. of the Second Serbia

Prostoru Nacionalne Moći,” Moći,” Nacionalne Prostoru , highlights thedichotomybetween the ation and theGučafestival. Jelena - Krstanović’s studyfestivalKrstanović’s ‘The order’ se describedas standingF a for - Sozialistischen Festkultur Sozialistischen , 17

Lukić ation and authenticity whiletrying

ion to nationalion to feeling,again notion particularly -

and World Music marketing.and World portrays , non - Krstanović alsoKrstanović discusses s created the within - newly

the eventthe asauthentic see the first one. see

interesting aspect of interesting Zbornik Radova Radova Zbornik -

(, Zurich, Zurich, (Vienna, composed Feste, Feiern, Feiern, Feste, irst

) folk h that More

16

CEU eTD Collection P 18 alternat analytical value constantly when overused. For analytical ‘identity’, for tools theterm since Identity’RogersBrubaker’s ‘Beyond One ofthe most everydayethnicity. level. The relevant literature inthis perceptionfestival and oftheconse visitors in Guča,can we no top battle overand modern nation. theFollowing analysis of Serbian this notion the state ofthe organis circumstancesa aswell necessary as onauthenticity focus outo itself tobe nationally coloured by participantsofthediscourseHistorical described before. (especially folklorisation) Taking marketing Music, onWorld perspectives these logic and historical circumstances the festival occur. and music could tothat music, inaddition of thereforea provideva scene.be seen Thisaccount inthe can light ress, 2004).

Rogers Brubaker and Frederick Cooper, “Beyond ‘identity,’” in in ‘identity,’” “Beyond Cooper, Frederick and Brubaker Rogers III. - down discursive processes and other dynamics underlyingdown discursiveand and other processes music thefestival dynamics trumpet

er’sworkedtogether inm side, Everyday Everyday ive notionsof(self

significant

w move ontothe finalof clusterw move li ethnicity

luable startingluable analys for point - into account,I toexpl into able be will ) categoris

piece the festival, to givethe festival, an to

s

in the corpus of literaturein the corpus onethnic is of identity

area . ation andare identification 18 aking awelcome event targetinterpretive the the in

In article,Brubakeralternative this argues for is in the is in quences ofanquences event’s nationalis of notionoffolkloris Čolović’s according tohim, 14 the present

field answernationalisand why tohow ing theinternallogicing trumpet behind

terature analys toalso inorder of iden ethnic (or national) Ethnicity without Groups without Ethnicity

research specifically, the research specifically, the ain why theGuča festival offered this expressionthis loses its f marketinglogic onthe particularly important to ation and can ation ona micro

(Harvard University University (Harvard clearly tity and e the ation of

CEU eTD Collection 20 19 be holidays widened national from toother ev seemingly However, becomesandtherefore is thenorm often hidden Billig’s Nationalism’ In part of group. this festival hasameans perception ofit be is different to what Serbianwho and of groupThe differena meaning of is the group, thatoutsiders not seen asmore one groupbutas homogeneous different very twoor of onesby the members research since performed just or as dynamic and process dependent Insteadgroupsgivenas world, aproposestotreat thesocial ofseeing Brubaker unitin them he gives to the ta In‘Ethnicitygroups’ without rethinking of Bru howtheythemselves nationalidentity, andconnect with this othersthey For if do. keep inmind,

Billig, in Groups,” without “Ethnicity Brubaker, Rogers

the field breaking ofeverydayethnicity,the oneground oftheworks MichaelBill is baker, a consequence ofrethinking abaker, Banal Nationalism Banal

main argument is thatinthe is main argument

people arenationalityconstantlypeople their reminded ineveryday through of life banal , the the

20 as it isexactlyit the

who

ken things like anthems,things flags holidays. ornational like these tools can asking participantsofthe servefor theseas festival abasis tools how see ethnic or other kinds of groups. otherethnic kindsof or

‘ happens

- was the

for .

- (and unfortunately scholars) granted naturegroups ofethnicaccounts many inthe of scholars. ’ . These thoughts on ethnic groups. These are ethnic on thoughts

first explicitly to , 19

crucial

he onthe concept thereforeelaborates of t for everyone,and t for –

world of nation statesworld ofnation ethnicity therefore does not simply exist, it israthethnicity it therefore simply not exist, does point ofthepoint the term the Ethnicity without Groups without Ethnicity ents a like musicfestivaltherefore and shed 15 point at point , unquestione identity identity

T wo often toas collectively refer ‘the Serbs’.

also nationalism’s hidden, everyday nature.

Serbias as a categoryas aofanalysis

that we live in every participantofthe Guča d

and discourse ‘theare Serbs’ that

(Harvard Univer (Harvard Billig’s particularly thereby made thereby

argument , nationalism , nationalism ‘ groupism

sity Press, 2004). sity Press, relevant and invisible. invisible. is alsothe

can clearlycan ig’s ‘Banal ’ who isnot , a label to er

this

CEU eTD Collection 23 22 21 idea ofmaterialis materialis such special isin it circumstances thatare that‘solidarities otherwi insight the importa into He nationness has been largely Michael Skey’s‘Carnival One accountsgiven by visitors. nati that music festiv His things that symbol i national identity activities, while ismundanely shaped ineveryday Building byBillig, proposed ontheideas Edensor Tim therefore and otherbecan and experiencedvisitors dynamics, ofas a‘reminder nationhood’ by its light on

Ibid., 146 Ibid., Emotion?” Surplus of “‘Carnivals Skey, Edensor,

contends onalis model of amulti dynamic, a last

festival andthe music

the s ever stable and uncontested.s ever and stable paper paper reinforce – Life Everyday Popular Culture and Identity, National ation of theevent through does public discourse necessarily not ed and [is that‘evidence

147. can in Western democratic countries comes tothein Westernfore democraticcomes countries and question, als

that such special moments like carnivals,that such momentsgive like special festivalsgreat andholidays can

worth mentioning, play a inidentity such role sportsandfilms.play as formation, rituals,celebrations, and the notion thatsymbolsand thenotion areuncontested never inthefact isalso reflected left by untouched ed solidaritiesandcommunity the play evidence definitelya for role inGuča

feelings belonging. ofnational

how nceglobalis ofnationality ina s

an eventcolouredby been that has nationally bothpublic discourse

of surplusemo

played there

- faceted process can ofidentityformation

also Billig’s deriving from everyday nationalism

provided Billig:nationalism, ecstatic

He

meanpeople and different todifferent thatthe things

tion gives for examples numerous ] thatthenationa is community’ knowable] ’ 16 . 22

Skeyanalys

. ing world.

21

further develops the notion that furthernotion the develops es aeveryday partes of life that those moments when Skey’s thereby se only insisting that

main main ostensibly easily easily

have toreflecthave the in becomes visible. visible. becomes presumed’get argument that is be applied to no

, ‘

national is banal finally . 23

This ’

CEU eTD Collection approaches obviously will differ. Discoursebeand que applied interview media Analysis,bothto some data, will ought the be intwoparts While to outlined here, as well. mainmethoddescribed Critical public isbased thesis As this ontwo Methodolog participants nationalcolouring. experiencethis banal event like Ias theconsumptionthereof, been further strong theGučaand between dichotomy thattheTwoSimić) insights forHoweve andathesis. this strong basis in oneway describedidentity or theformat processes other of in between,as and economic such historical factors.Thecited aboveworks scholarly all have discursive approacha bottom and corpus bycombiningfar thathave perspectives so Departing discussed from inthis theliterature influence as are well, andan these important very for notions discourse, with themethodology personal collected theother ininterviews, experiences

the perception of theparticipants.the perception examined ical framework ical

a trumpet festival getssostron a trumpet Serbias culture into discourse politics and stretches from also created the . By both,the creation space agiving fullaccount on as of national well intend separate yetseparate connected

-

up societalwhilenotunderestimating one,

to fill this gap this andto fill answerwhy a and seemingly how

Exit festivals,Exit thelogic process this behind hasnot

17 section

gly identifiedgly andhow withnationalism its

r, whileithasbeen (e.g.r, argued mainly swering how a appearance national analytical dealing chapters, one with , thepresent contribute thesis been separated:been a ion and have givenion andhave valuable top other - stions and stions down

by Marina

s dynamics dynamics

to the may

CEU eTD Collection 24 his of discursive strategies usedbygivena author oftext the are tobeidentifi viewedresult asinteractions ofsocial relationsfactors a and andisthese power it hidden that analysisand therefore Itframework. aperceived from derives overem Discourse Analysisbyet Wodak other as al.introduces perspectivestothis described analysesmost toisolate repeating is andinteractions patterns social different in texts. that lie at core its c adjective a ‘critical’ modi suggests, et al.intheir book‘The constructionnational discursive identity’ of scientific methodusedDiscourse be here by will thatof Critical Analysis as outlined Wodak analysis forum publicweb innewspapers discourse and of In the of Analysis disco public onventional

Wodak, Wodak, chapter 2

or her 4. 3. 2. 1.

Strategies ofTransformation Strategies ofPerpetuation Constructive strategies Strategie The Discursive Construction of National Identity National of Construction DiscursiveThe

thoughts , thetop

discourse analysisdiscourse i connotation of theotherconnotation of e.g.: positive calmingthe self, connotation negative warning, of down, e.g.: ‘we’ e.g.: and assimilation e.g ed by theanalysis.crucialed Of importancein s of Justifications of andRelativis ..: – . Wodak

how positive self - downplaying, blaming, legitimising anddelegitimis blaming,legitimising downplaying,

down construction meaning ofdown national throughthe be will discussed aims

somethingimportant than more issaid is ’s book

to urse

introduce

- portrayal, black & black creating portrayal, continuity colouring, white s stronglyfocused onlanguage and i

in newspapers and newspapers forumsin and web

names anames number ofsuch strategies: fication of more traditionalanalysis. discourse

inclusion, exclusion,inclusion, singularis

other, Discourse interdisciplinary,toit. is approaches 18 ation ation phasis onlanguagephasis discourse inclassical

.

, aimed at convincing theaudience of s. As already mentioned, the s. Asalready mentioned, this

process is theidentificationprocess is what

. ation, useation, ofthe collective 24 t is linguistic realist is

This method is, astheThis method is,

is said, andthe aim of ing

This Critical

ations

CEU eTD Collection 25 ofconsumption national meaningatI the festival,atte the same The micro level analysis of Analysis and worth noting. festivals are expectatio obvious for descriptions of Serbia (beand orway) asecond, isrelevant inanother it question,soare first theresearch to more traditional analysis. discourse every Obviously,of directmention some sortof divided Other questions be to answerednew by the andinclusion exclu conflict.side inthis Other one topoi hasfor lookout respect toespecially aresymbolic inthis blackcolouring, and white two, dividing into Serbia important than others. Different strategies play ofa perpetuation crucial role done byany ofthe using separation and nationalare communityarticles innewspaper and created howthis andforums web perspectives.the analysis showhowSerbia aimcompeting ofisto as The of astate versions The media in analysis presented

Ibid., 36 Ibid., is 5.

finally Strategies ofDemontageandDestruction –

methods. Inmethods. todescribe order thebottom 42. developed into developed

the the application the e.g.: discrediting what Serbia meansAnotherwhat tolookout aimportant Serbia to person. topic specific interview

sion, thesion, useof ‘we’, legitimising and delegitimis

provided discursive strategies mentioned;

a taken

and observation data

of the

ns in this respect,while this ns in

others andexclusion chapter 2 -

for in T wo Serbias Music todifferentand discourse areas. chapter 3 - granted notion in Serbian in granted public discou notion

of this thesis will of thesis this spaper and forum materialspaper 19

will partly,will notentirely, though

- up processes inthereception involved or implying tochoose one’s thenecessity

25 nded it last summer. Since Inded lastsummer. Since it have

other connections

however,are clearly some more

largely

be based on based be ing. require

are as just im

here

rse. Thiscan be the be on based these , especially, methods of

portant visited visited

CEU eTD Collection sample givean overviewof actor these according criteria those festival totheir butratherroles toany according of inthe urban), and again bedividedintoex interviewees. some criteria were There As for theinterviews, data event Other like. looks highlightderivable noteswill not observation points from interview mentioned T furthermore toexemplify appearance prove useful thenationalistic of throughout main sourceanalysis, of participants perceive of thefestival national its colouring. Therefore It and musiciansto include aswella as participant obser of research my accordingly.inmind Having pre the even was this -

or photos

clear thesis, Ithesis, conduct semi to decided

respectively Two therefore t twice before in 2011 and 2012, t twice in before

chapter 3 social class, to name just a few. InI name aend, just few. class, selectinterviewees the decided to not social

from the from the start visitors, visitors, - s , suchactions, as rituals social hirts and other mercha hirts andother

included:

one inhis to add to or contrast with the interview data. The photos will will toorcontrastinterviewadd data. the with photos The to one of the main questions was how to decide on the sampleofwas ofthe howtodecideonthe one mainquestions -

the photosan Yugoslavsandage, others), that an observation prove will not answer initself sufficientto how

s by including visitors, organis visitors, s byincluding mid - 40s and one 60s inhis ndise) andgeneral togivendise)readeraidea the ofwhat the d field notes takend field atbeused notes will the festival

imaginable - structured inter structured

I id had some and - 20 existing knowledgeandexisting theresearch questions

songs sung onthestreets.songs sung : nationality (Serbs and non gender vation of thefestivity. ea expect ofwhatto views participants,organis with , from , demographic background (rural,, demographic ers and m

Novi Sad , instead ofbeing the , instead

the festival (the festival the usicians. The finalusicians. ,

and organis and

- Serbs who can

Belgrade –

I chose ed my ers

to

CEU eTD Collection the interviewee thepresencenationalism perceives atthe festiv ofSerbian Iterms andnotions visito order fromresearchThe myfocus. result iscloseto interviewees Iaround of fromand seven onemy consisted hourquestions was broad side,while letting The were interviews conducted semi another thisselection. advantage of I who journalists, coul provide, however, iscoverageg all major of gender aspects advantage. a inthesampleconstitute either,Having major as doesproblem nowoman not Serb islikelya precondition, sense toeven this having in be only Serbs Inproblematic. toanalys order and notasingle non The imbalance - - -

rs. For analys to answer the question howthe thenational resonatto answer Guča festival question colouring ofthe A active inthe village community A local residentearly his in for 60s,workingthe 1961 the local school A former

musician

talk about whatever about th talk s do not

of thisselection of

organis

ing the interviews, I interviews,again the ing use and multiple championand multiple at Guča, was - Serb. However, havingSerb. my inmind research question

play a crucialplay roleresearch.a inthis this What d notget ofunfortunately hold ,

looking out for in this case are direct mentioning of nationalism outfor are case looking inthis (how of direct mentioning lives er

in his 80s in his

in Guča e the reception colourine of national the are

ey relevant movetoo faras didnot considered it aslong

apparent: mysamplea does singlewoman include not - . He structured and problem structuredand and was theand one of

was a roups involved inthe festival,roups 21 six hours of interpret,six to interview material in

professor of Serbian at language and literatureprofessor

d

( Critical in his latein his 20sfrom . H aving both locals and ‘outsiders’ and is aving bothlocals regional ‘ foundingfathers’event ofthe in )

- DiscourseAnalysis. The key centred. Each ofthemcentred. lasted Each

agricultural society and very g,a self mode of mode of may the - al, for instance),al, s identification as a excluding only , region

sampl this pool isnot pool this prove anprove

ing es with its es its with

does my my for

CEU eTD Collection Serbian society. whya colouring national spaceinthe of case of theoretical literature Gučaexperiences people’s in reflects there.Combiningframework this made with the Two Serbias Using howthe methodologicalI tofirst this framework,explain able bediscourse will on at the festival, toclearly asopposed definedexperiences. ofattention toexpressions (national) feeling, in reflections onanything Serbian relatedwithin s toadivision constructive as and ameans exclusion strategies(inclusion ‘in’ ofcreating the seemingly unveils inthemedia andthen and forums, onweb

banal event like this one this tookonsuchin like event strongbanal connotations national introduced

before, I providebefore,will a the behind fullpicture the dynamics of the trumpet festival Gučaand the trumpet in therefore explain *** 22

the sensetheir emotions howexpress people

ociety. Finally, Iociety. Finally, ga how the national colouringhow the national of - group)and ve special

CEU eTD Collection Indonesia,” Indonesia,” 28 Cohen, P. Anthony Wodak, 27 26 therefore discursive construction well as as onthe level ofindivid of what belonging belonging. butany can sortof also Moreover, this resultindiverging interpretations realis indeed plays acrucial inthe processidentity role of formatio repeatedly ofaThis notion discursive construction feeling of national and national belonginghas been inhabitants ofa country experienceaas each common othersharingbelonging. part media established throughAmongsta also varietyofdifferentmeans. includedthe others,Anderson Communities’ fundamental isBenedictworks topic ‘Imagined Anderson’s onthis theoretical entities inthesocialnot fixed worldor artificial but It scholarly widelycommunity agreed is by the Two moreor Serbias Chapter 2

E.g.. E.g.. Benedict Anderson, David Harnish, “New Lines, Shifting Identities: Interpreting Change at the Lingsar Festival in Lombok, Lombok, in Festival Lingsar the at Change Interpreting Identities: Shifting Lines, “New David Harnish, through a shared set ation, however, isthatdiscursive notonly actionand may create reinforce Fox and Miller and Fox , that is, media, thatis, The Discursive Construction of National Identity National of Construction DiscursiveThe a specific never uncontested.Atnever and alltimes diverging inallplaces, exist there interpretations Ethnomusicology taken up by other scholars upby other taken

, 26 Symbolic Construction of Community of Construction Symbolic

in whichhe lays the i out - national belongingnational because both means differing onthe level notions of of Idriss, “Everyday Nationhood”; Nationhood”; “Everyday Idriss, Imagined Communities Imagined

discourse

49 (2005): 19. 49 (2005): of media channel

,

as ani

27 , 3rd ed. (London: Verso, 2006). (London: ed. 3rd , mportant process factorinthis

andaccepted isincreasingly it action that discursive dea of an imagineddeacollectivean of belonging, s (nationwide television,r s (nationwide

23 ;

(London: Routledge, 1995 Routledge, (London: by now by

in acertain way

that nations, just likethat nations, just groupsare other ual reception n. What followsfromn. What this

adio and newspapers)adio and that imagined. Amongstimagined. the

. ). since it is it since 28

National belonging is for a major

na tional

CEU eTD Collection fi Serbiasexplaininggranted two and really into taken thedivision for discursive isand how this and besome theoreticalwill followed this byanalysis ofSe framework, a discourse today.giving onthe overview After a emergence historical ofthe inthe 1990sand discourse decades InI introducewill chapter, this theconcept of means asa state. fullyturn into alternative means developedit be ofwhat and to Serbian visions what Serbia only thegovernment’s targetedagainst andthe wa policies, nationalism a manag openlycontested Yugoslavia when toanend. socialist drewWh Itin wealth. not surprisingof Serbia therefore thatthenotion is lines inSerbian society whether Kosovo considers ornot one evenpopulation wouldnot agreethe present depending of borders on Serbian onthe state, indeed thestatefa theveryare still natureof started transition from its authoritarian rule Serbia many Asa isin instructive this. post examplefor an ways neverpopulation but by ever of what means it group, and tobea parteach takes certaingiven ofby a a part shared rose in the late 1980s and grewroseand towards stronger end inthe late of the 1980sthe nally study, case relates tomy of ed discussions on discussions evolved into a powerful dynamic that still guidesevolved public discussion intoapowerful still much dynamic ofSerbian that at first

to unite ato unite dissenting major populationbehindhim, part Serbian voices of the Serbian Serbian such as the such y singleindividual. web forums. The aim of this ofthis web forums.aim The the trumpet festiva

strong rural a

part of it. Additionally, ofthereare other it. part 15 r from undisputed. Agoodr fromundisputed. of Serbia’s part 24

Two Serbias Two years ago, themeaning‘Serbness’and of - urban divide ortheurban

l in Guč l in , a discourse that , a that discourse a. chapter

and Serbness ile Slobodan Miloševićile Slobodan 19 - socialist country thatonly 90s. While these90s. While were first is to showhow self is to dramatic rs, theyrs, were soonto

over the lasttwo north started being significant rbian media - south slopesouth - fault fault

CEU eTD Collection 29 forward intheir were collection well publication,especiallyAs thein this scholars Ivan involved and Čolović Mimica Aljoša, were oppositi Second Serbiapublication ofby the discussedafter a were oftexts was collection widely the intellectualregime. tothe Milošević opposition Theand of first theterm notion a time Yugoslav times hasAs it repeatedly mentionedby been now,t of a emergence The is sharedpart by a of significant thepopulation. a well developed system ofmeaning the dif one thereforecould aswell just talkabout the concepts ‘Two of‘Two or Hungaries,Croatias’ but alsomore developedand lesswar cases Extreme undisputed. wo whereother mind national countries identity of notions comingto and belonging arefrom far democracy, agood veryexampleofsuch does constitute a course case, thereare of many toSerbia. limited While Serbia, due toits that thedivergent interpretationofagroup country nationphenomenon asa a and is not cancharged be withdifferent meanings actors. bydifferent forgoodmakes sopopular, aalso as it isa part what it simplifyingconcept Throughout i this,

Čolović and Aljoša, Aljoša, Čolović and - known and respected inthe Serbianknown and scene that intellectual thet respected time, of ference lies inthefact toSerbia that on scholars simply ‘ named

and the and the t must bekept mind t must in Druga Srbija, Zbornik Tekstova Zbornik Srbija, Druga , unable toreallyhet describe the , unable

years S econd Serbia econd

of the ofsecession,Yugoslavwas wars of and originallycoined the by uld bethe so

widely discussed andwidely thetermdiscussed Second Serbia Druga Srbija’ which - ridden countries experiencecountries divergences.ridden such While

that thenotionofTwo inherently Serbias an is relatively

- there,

has been applie has been called ‘failed or states’ Afghanistan, like Somalia .

25 he notion of a S notion he

these (‘Second’ or short history both as a state andshort historybothasa a erogeneity the world, whichis social of

remarkabl interpretational differences turned into d to many areas ofd tomany public areaslife and I t is t is econd Serb also also y

adjustable conceptadjustable which ‘Other’ Serbia)‘Other’ important to important to ia dates backia tolate houghts put

soon was point out point

in 1992

. 29

CEU eTD Collection 32 31 1980s,” 30 increasinglyStarting broadened.ideological from t a opposition andintellectual political, As a conseque in anattempt tomake space ofwhat different it for conceptions understood itselfas folklore totality and“the to myth, oft was thattho public figures, (the prominent being most Dobrica Čosić) butincreasinglyalso II Ustašaand fascist theCroatian state established varying by alsomyths regime. degree around supported the mostly These revolved characteris was oppos bethe dominantnationalist vieweddiscourse at of inthe light that time But tothe antithesis existing the emergence ofthis inSerbia regimeand politics also its hasto Eastern Europe. representing pathsimaginable thetwomain during minded, Europeanand democratic. F yetcritical, established in intellectual discourse.

irst Serbiarural as while nationalistic, andoverallSerbia backward, theSecond isopen Marko Živković, “Stories Serbs Tell Themselves: Discourses on Identity and Destiny in Serbia since Mid the Serbia in Destiny and Identity on Discourses Themselves: Tell Serbs Živković,“Stories Marko Lukić by: As introduced - Krstanović, “Politika Trubaštva Trubaštva “Politika Krstanović, Proble ed asmuch tojust totheregime’spolicies ed by a abouted comeback thatwereand bythe ofoldSerbian stories myths nation toa

histori remarkably se actors applied idealsseapplied originality actors ofnativeness,as andderived ruralness, from ms of Post ms of

nce of the wid thence of leading to a wave ‘folklorisleading to of

Čolović, cal such as themes Kosovo,

an totalis answertothis

- Communism vague notions with theFirstandSec with vague notions Bordell Der Krieger Bordell e ofa reception Second of thenotion Serbia

44, no. 4 (1997): 22 4 (1997): no. 44, -

Folklor Folklor The two versions ofSerbia polar are opposites, The therefore two versions

From thevery start,From he entity” Serbian 30

. u and

Prostoru Nacionalne Moći,” 204. Moći,” Nacionalne Prostoru ation of certain characteristics tothewhole nation,

were by spread notonly ation’ 26 Ottoman suppression, Ottoman

– 29. 31 and after the decline of communism in communism after theand declineof

in public life.in public ofthis The result . . 32 T the

he late 1980s The Second Serbia seconnected scholars ond Ser really by and other politicians bia. They the described World War I, War World nationalist nationalist

means to be to Serbian.means , thatthemovement and earlyand 1990swere

the term’s meaningthe

moveme intellectuals

some World War War World well trend nt - - o the -

CEU eTD Collection 34 33 backmanages a well through historyand that toshow exists there of historicallyframed and expectations prejudices by commentators politicians and from through scholars, anda Europe the lens elaborate backgroundbreaking tothe book TheBalkanism’s term theory andunderstandingofcoursegoes fundamental Orientalism betweenopposition ‘ The maincharacteristic ofBalkanism Balkanism and Orientalism regional Balkanism. variation op understanding oftheconstruction discursive ofand severalgrasping for Serbiashowthe doing necessary however,itis this, tointroduce finalthe concept, one crucialfor the remainder The exa can takedifferent many forms then evenof a way,a third ‘Third ledtotheidea Serbia’, Internationalrapprochement withthe or Tribunal cooperation Criminal lines ofaSerbia Kosovo First (in like questions andSecond 2000. Theperception widely shared after thatpolitics regime, exhaustive evolved it intoan

Edward W. Said, Said, W. Edward Pe position betweenposition trović and Spasić, “Varijante “Varijante Spasić, trović and ct thisdiscourse natureTh even onTwo of or d

how the East (in his work thehis meaning Eastfirsthow (in andforemost East)viewed is theMiddle of thi Orientalism

s chapter,I toanalys when turn those supporting them those either of Europe’ andEurope’ ‘

(New York: Vintage, 1979). York: Vintage, (New Treće Srbije’,” 24. Treće Srbije’,”

. 33

of the same of name the

The The set of conceptions after theMiloše end of as atheoretical tool Balkan’ metaphors foras

27

. 34 ingBeforeand newspapersmedia. internet by Said Edward

came intoexistence: Orientalism orits In ree be developed will further Serbias in Milošević’s fall ‘Orientalism’ which which is theemphasis ’s

independence, EU is ‘the - also defined ofideas set about

in the 1970s in the , Said follows West’ andWest’ indeed not a fixed notion and notion not afixed most most on an absolute prominently followed the vić’s rule in ‘the , inwhichhe

this lens this East’. East’. )

CEU eTD Collection 40 39 38 37 36 2005). Press, University Princeton NJ: (Princeton, Green, F. Sarah 1999); Press, University Princeton 35 ‘Balkan’, thanthemselves. neighbouringthe next tothesouthandeast always state as abitmore backward, internalis I book. describedarticle Milica Bakić inan by A particularly aspect interesting onOrientalism discussion ofthis andBalkanismhas been themselves from Ottoman the‘wild’ also throughout didnot history self” describeBalkan as the the history as Said’sOrientalism Orientalism, aphenomenon is ownright but withahistory inits similarly dating as back in far Europe Maria greatOrientalist Todorova,framework which in to depthapplies the Balkans Theseabout ideas the orient what the orient

Ibid., 8. Ibid., Todorov Maria See: Milica Bakić Milica 188. Ibid., 18. Ibid., , 38 K. E. Fleming, Fleming, K. E.

n ‘Nesting Orientalisms’, n . [emphasis added] [emphasis 36 .

35

ed region, ineveryBalkan inthe Balkan andhow writers countrytendtoconsider T does

One of the most important books in this respect importantinthis books One ofthe most ‘ImaginingBalkans’ is by the odorova claims thatBalkanismodorova claims merely cannot considereda be sub - Hayden, “Nesting Orientalisms: The Case of Former Yugoslavia,” Yugoslavia,” Former of Case The Orientalisms: “Nesting Hayden, Notes from the Balkans: Locating Marginality and Ambiguity on the Greek on Ambiguity and Marginality Locating Balkans: fromthe Notes a,

indeed look like. indeed look is supposedto Imagining the Balkans the Imagining The Muslim Bonaparte: Diplomacy and Orient and Diplomacy Bonaparte: Muslim The Orientalism haveOrientalism applied been tomany regions, other notably also the

which absolute

.

37

look like, whichlook like, influences claimcommentators howwestern

partly However, different from Said’s account,However, differentfrom does Todorova n , however,

she

(Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997). Press, University Oxford New York: (Oxford, ‘Other’ of Western Europe, but rather as an“ ‘Other’ ofEurope,as Western butrather

describes the Orientalist how derive their self - Hayden

does not mean thatWesterndoes European not intellectuals . 39 28

40

already before ofTodorova’s thepublishing - understanding alism in Ali Pasha’s Greece AliPasha’s alism in - Ba Slavic Review Slavic

through distancingthrough lkanist discourse waslkanist South - Albanian Border Albanian -

unit of unit

54, no. 4 (1995). no. 54, (Princeton, NJ: NJ: (Princeton,

more incomplete - Eastern ot

CEU eTD Collection 43 42 (Lon Matthew, Collin 1999); Press, University State PA: The Pennsylvania 41 mainly nature,targeted political in the atregime, of the politics nationa important ‘ Čolović, bookbyIvan amongst ‘ these publications, carried intellectuals, by opposition publishingarticles scholarly The crucia most onthe topic. different means. least T Serbias of two construction discursive The basedcivilis onthesame strong between thetrumpet opposition festival Guča in EXIT and the Folk associated is withbackwardness strongly preferences withdemographiccoincide often background logic also applies tomusic, backw differences, (and Serbs especially rural neo whereas Serbian society, forintertwined civili isdiscursively instance, of often withnotions Two Serbias within This, onecan todistinctions argue, limited isnot easily

he discourse of Eric Gordy, Gordy, Eric Čolović, Aljoša, Čolović and don: Serpent’s tail, 2004). Serpent’s tail, don: 25 years25 and o

ard andard uncivilis the borders of connected with modernity,connected with isWestern Bordell d Bordell The The di This Is Serbia Calling: Rock’n’Roll Radio and Belgrade’s Underground Resistance Underground Belgrade’s and Radio Rock’n’Roll Calling: IsSerbia This Culture of Power in Serbia: Nationalism and the Destruction of Alternatives of Destruction the and Nationalism Serbia: Powerin Culture of scoursefollow er Krieger T T Druga Srbija, Zbornik Tekstova Zbornik Srbija, Druga hroughout thewas 1990sand thetimehroughout ofthe mainly Yugoslav it wars wo Serbias ver the course of this time, it was it ver course thistime, established the of

one ed, distancing their own group distancing fromed, these The sa theircharacteristics. own . ationally framed distinctions.

state andcleavages much ofas thebeing by created the described which generally thewhichto follow rural tends Druga Srbija’

this Orientalistthis then, Bordel Ratnika’ has , ruralness , as we have seen,, ashave we ,

42 .

-

has already been mentioned, so hashas another already mentioned,so been Balkanist logic.rural The 29 - oriented

and a and

. 43 -

urban by are described ones) urb But were sinceearly publications these certain

, urban between

. a notable history, a notable 41

Rock music is in t Rock isin music Balkan mentality. Alsothe

and whileNeo democratic,

states also can but beapplied and expanded and expanded -

urban divide, as musical urban festival Novi in lism andthelism wars, they - urban divide in urban dating back

his (University Park, Park, (University through many , 2nd ed. 2nd ed. , respect s ational anites as Sad is me at

- l

CEU eTD Collection limit the analysislimit after published toarticles 2 a well viewingcontent of the also other,less websites,of place. frequented thediscussions took where some pre After ofSerbia’snewspapers. The are majornewspapers an websites source,exist butthere obvious approach,limited only including rendering toconduct afullI simply analysis it impossible here. therefore opt journalistic articles,comments have posts andforum been onthetopic, reactions, written widely term this discussed typingWhen ‘ Newspaper discourse applications fromgeneral about more aSecond Third) (or Serbia discussions innewsp comments parts,in two ‘higher’ period shared perception that pol ofboth theor more moreas politicalcircumstances liberal Serbias,aresult and The This broadeningconcept ofthe the discourseoncultural meaning had as to take well. yetare not fifteen - . The following media analysis. The there following will media developed webdeveloped presence:

‘professional’ , thesecond

directly applicable directly years since then to the cultural sphere working D ruga Srbija

with two setswith two ofdata.first Theofnewspaper set consists articles and

,

of these websites, I include websites, twoofthese biggest Serbia’s to decided with dailies

and also and

discussions in web in discussions forums. itics indeeditics have these followed throughout lines ofdivision that

really ’ intoa searchquicklyit engine, how just becomes apparent have seen

to took place Politika.rs

the more theanalysis public discourse, is

and therefore cannot explain and thereforeexplain cannot the is.

and In more recent yearsrecent platformsmore and important more

to a growing ofpublicat number a the past years past the

Gučaforums. specifically inweb

only only

and 010. 30 fore focus onthe post after October the fall of Milošević in 2000. V

reme.rs

, an immense number of scholarly , an texts, immense number Moreover, the analysis will beMoreover, will movinganalysis the

. Furthermore, I. Furthermore, to chose myGuča.For caseof study this, ions on thetopicof two ions on - 2000 years2000 apers downapers toits

furthermore ed

for a more the widely . Toshowthe

further divide -

d

CEU eTD Collection http://www.vreme.rs/cms/view.php?id=992499. 47 46 45 44 Serbia, isgenerally it thatthey each indiagonal to other. supposed opposition Whenever stand While you He ‘Second’ is,if [...] either. a‘third’ want, Serbia” nationhood, stating is“the the nationalwhich not thathe the ‘First’ isnot Serbia, but a Serbia are thereby Cyrillic and Wimbledon” “modernity thenationalglobal,and andthe tradition, furtherwithout elaboration the tennis player This and ill e common place” media outlets. Their starts that“talking article withthe assertion about Serbias two isalready Ivanaand Spasić yearssource from the before toalsoinclude samples 2010. article yearsThe from 2000 to2011 veryone. Interestingly veryone. nother drew commentator

Ibid., 23. Ibid., “Varijante Spasić, Petrović and Bogdana Koljevi Bogdana 27. Ibid.,

ill

- for themajorno cleargiven part, is ofwhat definition on th definedfirst ands ofthe understandings - definition

e discursive construction ofe construction a discursive T ć, “Zašto j “Zašto ć, 45 Novak Đoković Novak

give

and thereareclear each very ideasbehind toalmost ofthe two,known can be reduced

a compelling overviewonthea debatesall major Serbian taking place in

e Novak Đoković Srbija,” Srbija,” Danas Đoković e Novak though . very 46

all theway and sporting downtoscripts competitions.

this state that Đoković stands forstate thatĐoković a because stands embraces ThirdSerbia he

In accoun their Treće Srbije’.”

have alre

nicely exemplified with nicely exemplified , this idea of a Third Serbia,a idea isoftenbasedtaken, this Third of on

direct connection

and his relation to Serbianand relationnationhood. his ady extensively covered been

t, the antagonisms between the First and S First t, the antagonisms between the hird Serbia 31 econd. econd.

from ofSerbian Đokovićtonotions Nedeljnik

patriotism and patriotism cosmopolitanism, 44

a

. and Icanand onthis depend largely frequent 47

In article this is meant by a First orSecondFirst is meant a by , May 26, 2011, 26, May ,

protagonist in protagonist by the aforementioned by the

, Petrović and Spasić, T a mara Petrović

the discourse:

- Also for econd - granted

CEU eTD Collection gradjanska 2012, http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Politika/Srbija 24, 50 49 48 wasit somuch not thetwoSe example the t One started and toshift define. are hard However, even connected totheopposi regime) and and militaristic xenophobic”, whiletheSerbia“authoritarian, is Second is Serbia Serbias might inquestion needWe toactuallyfurther togointime find direct back whateach the mentioning of of thanstandpoint) inobjective criteria. more vi granted.for part most usetermsfor refer very to tothem the Writers andthey simplified are what Serbiaare the First standfor andSecond notions largelyunnecessary,as these It Russia. thereforeapparent is that f lasting dealingwith commentators to seldomfail an tobe important madeorform, decision has society inpolitics and twoopinions

Slo “Varijante Spasić, Petrović and Biljana Čpa Biljana bodan Antonić, “Odgovor i “Odgovor Popovu Antonić, bodan wo Serbias denotative

in its 1990 in its amongst them sible when specific issuesappearsible when(andadherents specific ofeach quickly site theirchoose , twointellectuals - opcija.lt.html. jak, “Srbija Razgovara: Koliko su se približile se su približile Koliko Razgovara: “Srbija jak, . 48

Thereare

back then already, then back consequenceclear ofthislackdefinitio of that many attestcommentators - form describedas is theoldruling belongingthe Milošević(of class to

being questions of European integration,beingrelations questionsofEuropean Kosovoand to tion and described and as pacifistic “democratic, pro tion numerous indeed debate Treće Srbije’,” 28. Treće Srbije’,” point out point rbias that but the politicians thatconverged

stand

this this Dereti,” the author acknowledges that these clearauthor thatthese acknowledges the

examples coming the most tomind, or the participants in thediscourse, participantsin of or clear definitions the

frequently issue ofconvergence discussed that it i for. Infor. an Vreme

s theSerbia First we versus theare Second 32

, October 4, 2003.4, October , - to it razgovara i Nacionalna

article from 2003 . In. an for interview - koliko ns is the ns is

Građanska Opcija,” Opcija,” Građanska -

su - se perceived convergence of

- for instance priblizile Politika prominent stand - nacionalna - c Politika - European” ut definitions ut definitions , th

for them.

, in 2012 agreeing e Firste

, December December , and long are - i -

. taken taken , 49 50

for that that -

CEU eTD Collection http:// 54 http://www.politika.rs/pogledi/Todor 53 http://www.vreme.rs/cms/view.php?id=1056445. 52 http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Komentari/Kako 51 that theSecondlosing Serbiathebattle is belonging toNikolić’s Party Progressive identical are voiced opinions concerningPrime also Minister Serbian in traditional Second Serbia also an in article published betrayed his intellectual, talkingand positivelyNikolić’s presidency, hopefully about identified withthe regime nationalism ofthe 1990sand Serbian of Ina vein, similar oneof giving uptheir beliefs them). Thereby, ofdifferent notions Serbia the Serbias isthehumanagents thatchanged, it NikolićthanTomislav howtheframe twointerviewees of notions turned pro (SerbianSNS theultranationalist ProgressiveParty),from Radical whilederiving Party, Nikolić, whoadopted many ascribed Second positions Serbia tothe Theyespeciallynationalistic like politicians at point thecurrentTomislav Serbian president

Todor Kuljić, “Negrađanski Rat u Rat “Negrađanski Kuljić, Todor Jel p Srbija je Druga “Kako Ćirjaković, Zoran Muharem Bazdulj, “Hronika Najavljene Praznine,” Praznine,” Najavljene “Hronika Bazdulj, Muharem the ena Gligorijević, “Boris Tadić i Tadić “Boris Gligorijević, ena www.vreme.rs/cms/view.php?id=1241918. Second Serbia - the T European and pragmaticto Kosovo,therebyand with respectsEuropean seeminglythe mixing ideals or that ‘the Second istaken orthat Serbiatheideals up first’. became Apoint similar wo

Serbias. really is What how inthis, interesting

movement movement –

Politika’s the Firstremain Serbia andSecond thewaythey are. - circles at the time of presidentialcircles attheof time elections in

Klub Neodgovornih Intelektualaca,” Intelektualaca,” Neodgovornih Klub Građanskoj Srbiji,” Građanskoj Vreme

- now Kuljich/Negradjanski

journalists in2014journalists asked why intellectuals somany leading ost

two years dealingtwo before, withthe popula embrace politicians like Nikolić, who like embrace are politicians clearly ala Prva,” Prva,” ala - . je

53 and the F and the

-

Druga Comments topiceven this on goas faras stating representing Nedeljnik Vreme Nedeljnik

Politika.rs 33 s do notget the israther s do agents altered,it Politika.rs

- Srbija - rat irst is takingirst is again over - u - , August 15, 2013, 15, August , postala - , November 21, 2014, 21, November , gradjanskoj their arguments. It is not thet Itarguments.is not their

them (or formerlythem (or , June 11, 2014, 11, June , Nedeljnik Vreme Nedeljnik - prva.lt.html. . 51 - ever, the strategies isless of

Srbiji.lt.html. He specific cites one

in recent years in recent Aleksandar Vučić

to claim to , July 6, 2012, 6, July , Serbia . 54 representing

rityNikolić of 52

that he

and a . Hisparty wo , also liberal lmost lmost

has

CEU eTD Collection strane/Plemenska 55 impact onthe who gave ofview doeswhile this h point not uptheirandcamps, original switched despite theseto it, obvious commentators Interestinglydoes seem not holdany to longer. does this not though, sort of from and shift thefarthe SNS its right between current model andthe politicalsceneinSerbia. this Especially seldom definedgranted, andfor largely taken andjournalists intellectuals. therefore weWhat seediscussionsof onthe notion innewspaper each run the by country other, is conflictSerbias, between thetwo departcamp from the currentcannot inSerbia bereadilyby explained politics the using in the constant struggle Serbia First between andSecond the an the personalof a preferences writers dynamic,this identi they are not (whichnotion waswell defined never tostart with) i While

Jelena Lengold, “Plemenska Pitanja,” Pitanja,” “Plemenska JelenaLengold,

ill - fitting paradigm.

pragmatic pro t seems cited political collectivelyand above eventsagents explain ashiftin with turntothe a widespread implicitness ofthedivisiona implicitness twoor widespread into also three Serbias amongst existence ofthe to - very that clear pitanja.lt.

give up the give up

- - Europeanism, the division ofthe thedivision Europeanism, Serbian twocamps political sceneinto rhetoric Even thoughEven t html. discrepancies

However, t

model given

it is it camps as such. Other writers thediscrepancycamps Other assuch. attempt tosolve either fied as suchby thoseactiveInstead, inthe discourse. the some third” Politika.rs plainly general

. Instead,. use several they discursiveon tohold strategies intellectual, politician orintellectual, journalist, rather politician thanquestioning . One article in article. One in here are some voices atanhere areseeingend, some least or abreak, to the political centre,from ultra he exact nature . They the ‘blame’ agents concluding the arguewith twoSerbias that“while , May 21, 2013, http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Pogledi 2013, 21, May , discrepancies inthe applicat . 55 34 while

to current thatat lie politics theof heart Politika there be to a seems strong discrepancy

of a of T wo Serbias in the past yearspastwo Serbias inthe is , for instance, broadly up the sums First and Second SerbiaFirst are andSecond , they se twooldcategories,se donot , whileacknowledging that

and lead

ion ofthe argue that it wasargue thatit them - after nationalism to to nationalism journalists and journalists

the victories of the victories of Two Serbias ave any some - sa -

CEU eTD Collection http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Ekonomija/Dacic See: Russia. with relations good 57 113 (2010): Balkanu),” Na Kulture Perspektive (evropske Modernizacija I “Tradicija Božilović, Nikola 193 56 supporters tend ofFirsttheir tobesituated a(byopponents) Serbia classesinthe in the poorer Another indemography main lies geography. arenadivision ofthe anda recurring As theme, European in2014 Russia against sanctions foreign Serbias scene are done and aboutwhich are polit Kosovo.These classicSerbian examples on public opinion whether align should Serbia whatwith the EUor be moreor withshould Russia, strongly as earlyas In politics. respect, this there are As notedseveral times Areas of T the in th discrepancies),obvious let turn usnow hold toother areas, took division wherediscursive this in intellectual circles themedia and community ofholding tothe point face in (even ontoit of After p whilepolitics nottouching the well byThird Serbia,a simply introducing

See for instance: Seeinstance: for And Debuty Prime Minister Prime Minister Debuty And – 216; 216; e past years.e past ointing out that the notion of notion T ointing out that the . policies 56

– divided These questions areThese very questions also still

26. the 1990s and arethe 1990sand still

wo S , for vis instance Mladen Lazić, “Serbia: A Part of Both the East and the West?,” the and East the of Both Part A “Serbia: Lazić, Mladen

until today, follow until and where split this erbias

this farthis Dačić

discourse “Da

even , the čić: Srbija če čuvati Prijateljstvo s Prijateljstvo čečuvati Srbija čić: - à some very muchpresent -

vis the conflict in Ukraine,conflict where vis the felt compelled to re to compelled felt overall - established former twocampsestablished former

wo Serbias is well established wo Serbiasand is better even accepted capable of explainingcapable and of analys

recurring and topics thatwere themes partly discussed - Udeo

. discourse still still discourse 57

much

35 - u -

Petrohemiji

important important - , like the assure the public that Serbia will not give up its give up will Serbia not that public the assure s therough fault lines ofthe T today applies

- Rusijom,” Rusijom,” na for - already mentioned ime

understanding Serbian - duga

either. Politika.rs

Serbia did not join join didnot Serbia Sociologija - Gaspromu.lt.html. ing current ing Serbian first and foremostfirst to

Sociologija , July 10, 201 10, July ,

45, no. 3 (2003): no. 45, question

52, no. 2 no. 52,

4, wo s

ical

CEU eTD Collection Simić, “EXIT U Evropu,” 109. U Evropu,” Simić, “EXIT History and Psychology Sociology, TheC on‘ “Reflecting Gordy, D. Eric 60 59 58 reproduced intheFor academia. Krstić Marija instance, writes: “ trumpet festival Gučaand in thepop corresponding This combinationofdemographic phenomenon to folkwas associatedwithrural orsemi Moreover, was choice todemographic musical alsoclearly connected Listening background. opposing listening theregime, toNeo while inparticular, music in division where divided notonly alsocultural demographic inpoliticalbut describes in He and terms. this described, th Serbia inthe 1990s, Likeofto the thediscourse,s fitsmore aspects orless many description this other the First Serbia especially which isparticularly inthe cities, isrelatedtoSecondmusic and popular Serbia, folk of musical Western a in taste. While musical division genres, , importantly most betweenopposition and thecountryside thecities Serbia areas pictured middle suburbs, the

Gordy, Gordy, 109 Ibid., 109. U Evropu,” Simić, “EXIT The Culture of Power in Serbia: Nationalism and the Destruction of Alternatives of the Destruction and Nationalism Serbia: Powerin of Culture The –

its dance its 113. countryside and inparticular,countryside inthe country’s ofa south whilethose Second e population of Serbiaate was population . 60

manifestations. manifestations.

.

59

- pop variantpop thoug

h not necessarily so much today h notnecessarily somuch , no. 1 (2005): 11 1 (2005): no. , - ulture of Power’, Ten Years On,” On,” Years Ten Power’, of ulture class urbanites from centralclass from urbanites Serbia andnorthern

In dichotomy respect, this aclear Turbofolk - geographicand backgroundmu - rock EXITrock as

listening to Rockandbecamelistening Roll a symbol to for - rural people, while Rockrural people, was consider

the are as rur seen – - 19; folk signifieda

36 time time

festival in NoviSad, in festival also of theYugoslav wars playsa crucial role in al orsemi Facta Universitatis Universitatis Facta . As Eric Gordy hasGordy brilliantly. AsEric

certain

has developed between developed the has The Guča festivalThe hasan sical taste isalsoappliedto sical taste -

rural and as belongingrural and to pro which is - regime stance.regime indeed strongly -

, 107; 107; , Series Philosophy, Philosophy, Series the establishment . 58 even ed an urban

This ituation in ituation

CEU eTD Collection 64 63 2012). 62 Festival,” 61 of themajor Serbia festival realistic picture howhotlydebated theGuča thenotionsofdifferentalso of Serbias and In to order Di it generally forums seebetweenforum to indiscussions discursive howthis users, construct reflects who Guča indeed It therefore is representations and ofthe Western ofthedomestic national elements industry” cultural approachc to articles, they “Guča name discussing thed side of thediscourse dissertation onGuča appeared, against event accusations coming defending the from theother while onthe otherEXIT hand important roleintheimagining bygivingfolk ofthea nation it specific Serbian

Dragoslav Petrović, “Mesto: Petrović, Dragoslav Trumpet Guča the Serbs during and Serbia Representing Modes of Guča: to Lead Roads “All Krstić, Marija Branko Radun, “Kulturna ’Pink’ Strategija,” ’Pink’ Strategija,” “Kulturna Radun, Branko “Varijante Spasić, Petrović and in detail scourse web in forums . Let to . turn usnow

expand totheexpand very manifestation

really Nova Srpska Anropologija Srpska Nova this dichotomy is repeatedly dichotomythis coming is up cannot be expected tobe beexpected activeinthecannot broadernot even discourse and mayknowof .

analys ultural politics would be, as a start, to respect both Guča and Exit as wouldultural be,assymbolic torespect politics astart, Exit Guča and both obvious are, this are, this iscourse on a ThirdSerbia, instance for aniscourse example as e this transfer of the toamoree transferdiscourse of this and n forums in terms in ofmembership forums n .

62

Exit, nation Exit,

and also and section Also Petrović and the Spasić name festivals several when times

investigate Domašaj ‘Dragačevskog Sabora’ u Sabora’ Domašaj ‘Dragačevskog

Treće Srbije’,” 25. Treće Srbije’,”

presents Serbia as modernpresents Serbia and as urban 3 (2012): 451. takes alook

regularly and

how this festival itself isdiscussed inSerbian itself festival how this web Nova Srpska Politička Misao Politička Srpska Nova

democracy”

to beanalys mentioned

t discussions onweb forums. t discussions 37

as well, foras instance:

[Emphasis added]. [Emphasis

that thediscourse ofT ed thesis inthis , which had a

Kulturnom Milijeu Srbije” (University of Niš, Niš, of (University Srbije” Milijeu Kulturnom public , no. Special edition 1 (2008): 204. (2008): 1 Special edition no. ,

level and to level sufficient ” , thetrumpet fes . 61

“A postmodern “A postmodern

for 63 Recentlya even full

I

n newspaper n newspaper For this, such a way third such wo Serbi

number ofposts

provide a more - rural identity, I chose two as does tival . 64

in

CEU eTD Collection 68 67 ili 66 65 “ outside position): spirit! youcoming Guča,aSERBknow that is telling from this a tothis story.listen Europe, year!happening ofthe folk culture. One Many that the festiva share theopinion users instance, favour thefestival. against and one intheforumdisputed under posts scrutiny and thereare TheSerbia questionof howfarisculturally inGučarepresented debated iswidelyand Serbness Notions of the imageabroad festival. ofSerbia as ofthe aresult Guča main clusters of the word ‘ those within discussions posts. smaller than one hundred in on thetopicof Guča

- “GUČA Ili EXIT,” EXIT,” “GUČA Ili Atrakcija,” Svetska “Guča: “Guča,” “Guča,” “GUČA,” EXIT. Serbia. ItSerbia. can members andexceeding several be often long, thousand discussions very has ”

67

Krstarica Forum Krstarica [Emphasis in [Emphasis states that Guča isthe“ states thatGuča Krstarica Blog Krstarica Guča’

Krstarica answers Krstarica Forum Krstarica

relevant

in the title andin the title for instance I beautifulit when takes [traditions] find every care nation ofitsown .

, The first oneiscalledThe ‘ per

forum.krstarica.com/entry.php/8739 , . However,activity there withnew issteady every posts d ” the comment 31, www.forum 31, comment 66 Forum

topics discussed intheonlin

post. Thepost. second issimplycalled forum ‘ Another on or iginal] , - writes: “ writes:

comment 23, forum.krstarica.com/sho comment23, Srbija

I simply all threadsforums searchedfor having those in two following the methods ofdiscourse following methods the strongest manifestation ofnationalstrongestin all manifestation culture , One particularly pos telling Also comment 1, www.forum 1, comment e goesfurther,e even In Guč

auser Croatian agreesadds (com and Krstarica’ l is aclearl is representation of - a we find ofnational the spirit a pride we srbija.com/showthread.php/164734 38

e Notions communities: ofSerbness - GU%C4%8CA.

and is as always - srbija.com/viewtopic.php?f=253&t=8786. saying

one of wthread.php/158036 t from the

“ w

two main opinions mainopinions two Forum

hen you hearhen the trumpet analysis the biggest

authent first campfirst - Srbija’

- I identified two GU%C4%8Da. ing from an ay and lively ic - such GU%C4%8CA

of – and is

Serbian

, for it’s theit’s Serbia

– forum

one in ”

.

68 and ”

. s 65 -

CEU eTD Collection 73 72 71 70 gu%C4%8Da. 69 Serbia inthemake world. country They ourbeautiful for known,good known better having a festival] Similarly, goodof and Serbia time corrects whiledoing this inthe world alittle theimage atleast in Guča Numerous the event and are toforeigners,glad reaches out thatit and those who isolate twomain those lines: who arefestival proud oftheculture (and the portrayed the Serbness of andappreciation theeventa representation Gučanot,we as in thereofcan or and it visit borders The cluster second posts contains i The also don’t believe represents thatit any kindoftradition identity else adds that is acaricature tradition and of the trumpet festival cu areal is representation ofSerbian However, quite theresome were also

“GUČA Ili EXIT,” comment 24. comment EXIT,” “GUČA Ili Ili Guča???,” “Exit Ibid., comment25. Ibid., comment48. Ibid., comment37. Ibid., mage Serbia ab of

” . One post says: “ . One says: post and ” . . , 70

73

another user thinks that“ another thinks user users positively identified with the image Serbiatheoutside world presented of to

first

Elsewhere writes:a “ person w to

hile “ the the music and eventthe music Guča are in not get knowSerbia to thequestion there.offollowing Closely theopinionson Krstarica Forum Krstarica

anotherone adds that “ importance of

road Iappreciateevery

is , comment 15, comment

our attempted of Jazz version the Guča festivalthe referring to Serbia totheworld bestway canitself its in present the [at users I thatSerbhood showsitselfinGučaand don’t think both [Guča and both [Guča

forum.krstarica.com/showthread.php/393466 disagreeing portrayed is thatwhat withthe idea at manifestation thathas theaim togive amanifestation people

the image ofSerbia country the image outsidethe 39

for a part orour of folklore ournational

this, sincethis, come many foreigners to ” lture. One of them statesthatlture. “ them One of . EXIT 71

dislike itorevendislike ” ] are good for theimagegood of are for ] . 69

Very simil arly, someone feelashamed - exit ’s - ili ” Guča re) . - 72

for for

CEU eTD Collection 78 77 76 75 74 the twostanding largely points followthe f itself, itdoesatan point uncertaintya means state, ofwhatSerbia and asculture nation and see side,withusers and adefending clear pro this contra notunusual in While is each ofthem. some interestingcorrelations become ofall, broad First inboth visible. clu levelour initial theconstruction ofanalysis, and presentation Taking this s Chapter imageabroad. Serbia of some personal tomany importance the participantsandmany of them about worry the have question oftothe outsideworld representation amongst theforum anot in negative way Similarly: everything as 100% authentically Serbian unique Again, brands sense festival of an pride this towards co notfortime, war

“GUČA.” comment108. Ibid., Ibid., comment44. Ibid., 18. comment “Guča,” Ibid. nnection and between Serbia many war opinion, inWestern public simply posts a show

a

firm therearealso voices negative co home 75

and “

it could be muchb couldit be ummary brief glance somebrief ofthe into surrounding discussions web forums to Guča in back opinion on this topic,whether onthis opinion they The appreciate dislike it. questionhas quite or -

brand but the commercialisbrand butthe “ All ofEuropealready of knowsus[because Guča] ”

. 74

Generally, when even about nottalking such

. 78

Gen erally,clearlycanrecognis one

etter organis d its popularityd its inthe world: “ ncerning this ‘Serbian “ brand’. ncerning this ation of tradition there labelling of and the ,

ed so that it really it eda sothat Serbian becomes br makes me wonderactuallymakesreal is how this ault lines created 40

e the importance givene theimportance tothe by theT

of separate versions ofSerbia,of versions separate ” critical - partic . 76 Guča and Exit are Exit SerbianGuča and wo Serbias discourse.wo Serbias

Guča is in factGuča isin our ipants. ipants.

issues asthe issues sters oftopicswesters Many people and ” . - 77

and

CEU eTD Collection around it. the talk trumpet festival aboutthis be and islikely onereasons ofthe to aboutIt Guča forums. thatplays web obvious the overall onSerbian is role discourse also a in cul the discourseto demographicand the‘high’ finally from conceptions political stage the down o Oriental discourse. anhistorical Departing from overviewand the Summi in any infact whilethis way, amongst the festival, highlighted theopponents is that of it the event does SERBa tells s Also some strategies playGuča ofinstance in afor unification role, when “a saying that “ blatant. defending People Gučaa r as ofwebcontext forums.Especially,collective useof‘we’and theprecisely the more is ‘ours’ Many the discursive of strategies what it Therefore, muchwhethernot so is festival thequestion the represents butrather something opponents, asthey donotfeel ofSerbia there. are that their conceptions represented represents therefore thosewho argue doesrepresentmeans misleading.it For it Serbia, that this The inthese question often forums discussed Guča whether actually Serbia represents is our lder ones how toshow tural sphere, Itural analys sphere, turned to

beautiful country”, “allbeautiful ofEurope country”,already knows

ng chapter up,this has highlighted the actually ism and Balkanism, I andism Balkanism, analys have This foundation nowallows ust their tory”,

represents. represents. Serbia, not necessarilySerbia, Conversely, not thatofistrue others. thesame for the it

thereforesingle Similarly, of member group. every represents this self

- explaining the concept ofT explaining the only only e reflects discourse more howthis in described by applies epresentation of Serbnessepresentation repeatedlythese strategies: use

ed recent newspapered as articles recent as samplesof well to their conceptionto their of Serbia. o step tothe micro levelif and howthis andsee

development and nature of the Two andnature Serbias the development of 41

Critical Discoursealso inthe Critical show Analysis

us wo Serbias is today. Thenwo Serbias following istoday. ”,care “atakes its nation of theoretical

framework of framework

casual discussions casual discussions

for the manyfor disputes not

represent Serbia own ”.

CEU eTD Collection thatimplications might have. discursive colouring ofGuča innationalterms reflec

*** 42

ts in theaccounts ofvisitorsandts in what

CEU eTD Collection recognisable the festival’s allow ustoanswer will what participants.This several are questions: the o nationalist own event its in right largely israther a but the target thatcolours as discourse it of InIas toargue, order not enough. soinfluential. is simply discussions behind thebig discourse because these Afterpublic discourse? iseasy all, it that theevent much this talked toconclude is about th Would many another inSerbia, manifestations just other arena ofthe IsButmatter? whyaccept doeseven this inGuča that notenoughthe festival to it is,like the festival an specific of version Se how the nationali tend to I have accepted and inte amongstjournalists, politicians, widely shared that thediscursive between distinction ofSerbia different versions itthen developedborn in the 1990sand how In the The national colouring of the Chapter 3 ne, iscrucial it toalso previous chapters, I chapters,andprevious described have furthermore

follow very at already not answer

signs of Serbian nationalism in Guča? Is nationalismGuča? in of thenational ofSerbian thefestsigns character d what o d what s ation of thefestival connectionbetween (the discursive eventa the and

shown that discussions about thatdiscussions on web the Guča festivalforumsshown trumpet similar rbia, i.e.therbia, First Serbia intend ther factors contribute analys

lines. T , thatthefestival cannot Guča initself described in as be a e the perception of those who actually perceptione of those the experiencefirst it hand: the

he question I he question question, why Gučaquestion, why present andcontestedinSerbian isso Guča

and broadenedand to the national colouring ofGuča.to the ) reverberates amongst people

43 a trumpet festival nalys

am goingam toanalys

ed how the T discourseed how of

in the early have We in theseen 2000s. overall llectuals and thewider public. as e in this chaptere thenis inthis

a T

wo Serbias nation nation B actually visiting ut c is today well wo Serbias was

learly, this is is this learly, discourse? discourse? ival widely

CEU eTD Collection Konstrukciji Etničkog Identiteta,” Identiteta,” Etničkog Konstrukciji 79 merely consider, nam While not merelytestinga questionof the to whether expands infact discourse The issue w meaning national and Music, festivals of consists ethno trend of folkloris I point, thenanalys will 1980s, the period w followed by a historical festival of overview from the itself foundationlate its in1961to what consequencesGuča be like colouringThiswill a thenational may festival have. of introduction of some and ITo answeram qualitative goinganalysis questions, these oninterviews a based topresent thesis reproduce the discursively we distinctions havecreated pa seen inthe previous colouring tospecific,graspable nailed be down evidence infactmaybe ordo visitors experienced How Can this dothey by thevisitors? express asandinterpret such this?

Just like music is both a product and a creator of culture. See: of culture. creator a and product a music both is Justlike participant - ? marketing, that

reflecting

question will question will the hether and how the and nationalhether how ely that the festivalely also thatthe couldinitself

analysis ofthe empirical collectedintheinterviews. data observation ation alreadyand briefly before mentioned

it globalisation andglobalisation commercialis . hen a hen 79

final final

There are three e the e naturally

process ofnationalis theoretical

conducted at the festival last yearconducted last festival at the Etnološko diverse

play athereisanother role, aspectplay more important to

- processes of nationalis processes of Antropološke Sveske Antropološke

principal interact howmusic and nationalism and on framework

colouring of the Guča festival affects its visitors of is its theGučacolouringfestival affects 44 ation started taking place. Departingfro

ways ways

ation. The create imaginable, Marija Ristivojević, “Uloga Muzike U Muzike “Uloga Ristivojević, Marija

13 (2009): 117 13 (2009):

national meaning, instead of ation active inGuča

remaining lastly . The in which this in whichthis , th

chapter will start an will with chapter – 118. e logic ofWor e logic

part of part

this

very level. basic the rt could : the general: the s of this s ofthis

chapter ld Music, ld Music,

be the m that then

CEU eTD Collection Berg Publishers, 1997), 7. 1997), Berg Publishers, 82 Ethnomusicology Co National Music and “Soccer, Popular see: identity of sense positive create a to used be can music how of example As good a 81 Cohen, Edensor, 80 certainare markedas typesnationaland ofmusic music as ‘one’s own’ signifier difference, of separating servingWhile ofgroup, asand amarker unityone commonality within All affection ( visible to them, m functions ofmusicwithidentity inconnection as describe main journal of nationality. Timothy for Rice analys instance field of ethnomusicology have of inthewithnotions past dealt increasingly have transmi The inparticular culture idea ingeneral andmusic a thatpopular couldeven signifier be Music and i servesa carrier this as of case: meaning, thefestival musiccarries national thedoes,or theact ofattending already it

Timothy Rice, “Reflections on Music and Identity in Ethnomusicology,” Ethnomusicology,” in Identity and Music on Rice,Timothy “Reflections particular In Martin Stokes and others, others, Stokes and Martin

of the these refer points to

largely thesis inthethis introduced first been chapter of Symbolic Construction of Community Construction Symbolic tter of national by feeling upon has many touched been National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life Everyday Popular Cultureand Identity, National through common

and giveand usic can topre give expression dentity Billig,

11, no.(2002):11, 2 1 the Banal Nationalism Banal it

field, ‘ field,

a positive a positive

.

82

Ethnicity, Identity and Music: The Musical Const Musical The andMusic: Identity Ethnicity, This

meaning. dances, for Ethnomusicology’ process

– creati connotation. 27. ; nsciousness in Post nsciousness in this

on of through boundaries music . is oftenobservablestateswhere innewly independent example

group from anothegroupfrom - existing identities existing 81 , since theearly, since four main 1980sand isolates

ed

) 45 , give ,

all all

- in acertain way State identityrelated ;

identity a - Socialist Bulgaria, 1994 Bulgaria, Socialist r

d by ethnomusicologists: Accordingd by one , . make collective belonging 80 , Ethnomusicology

more graspable more by scholars of identity, ofwhichscholars

Additionally, scholarsAdditionally, inthe ruction of Place of ruction claiminga certain type of official, while others are official, papers published in the published papers

in one wayin oneoranother.

music music

Donna A. Buchanan, Buchanan, A. Donna –

96,” 96,” identity and

7 (2007): 34 7 (2007): , 2nd ed. (Oxford: (Oxford: ed. 2nd , can ‘feel’ or British Journal of of Journal British also – be a be s 35;

CEU eTD Collection (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 109. 2011), Macmillan, York: Palgrave (New 88 Geography Political Singapore,” in Parades Day National Analysisof Spectacle: An and Ritual of Production the through Identity 87 86 85 folkloris 84 89. 1991 in since Nationalism and War, Music, Popular Borderland: 83 that to them the way might it ha However, alsobeclear itmust that notnecessarily insuch do events those participating react with afeeling ofbelonging. today’sglobalis nationalism’ integrative as function, nationalholidays such knowable community” “ betweencollective and in identity participation feelings ofcollective dealt belonging. Michael Skey has Apart also from themusicitself, Festivals, public events identityand trumpet festival Gu in certain degree below, trumpetdoes music playfor national role Serbian this self neglectedand materialise solidarit

The nationalis Such a special event has also been analysed in: in: analysed been also has specialevent a Such 147. Ibid., 146. Emotion?,” Surplus of “‘Carnivals Skey, by Croatia example of the on detail great in described This been has Michael Skey, Skey, Michael

manage to ation.

87

ation of trumpet music itself will be music itself trumpet of ation

National Belonging and Everyday Life: The Significance of Nationhood in an Uncertain World an Uncertain in Nationhood of Significance Life:The Everyday and Belonging National . H thereby also

mobilis ed world reconnected world with

16, no. 3 (1997): 213 3 (1997): no. 16, e argues such thatin moments ofheightened awareness creates amusicalcreates boundary ies that areies that presumed” otherwise

ča devaluated . e national feelingsFox others. better Jon than 86 indeed serve as a signifier as well serve asindeed asignifier

Skeyfocusedfirst ve intended been by 88

the setting of . 83 – 39.

As IAs am going to

their imagined community,their canimagined which provide them Lily Kong and Brenda Yeoh, “The Construction of National National of Yeoh, Construction “The Brenda and Kong Lily

further discussed later in this chap this in later discussed further and foremost oneventsand thataremeant have foremost to an

46 . – a festival 84 festivities

its

moments that hecalls ‘ecstatic moments

Music may therefore

organis 85 show inthe section onfolkloris

and “give evidencethea nation is that

or public event extensively withthe connections

and argues thatthey may

as creator of national feeling.as national creator of ersare and there Catherine Baker, Baker, Catherine

(Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2010), 55 Ashgate, 2010), Surrey: (Farnham, - understanding andunderstanding toa gives in the case in the ofthe can , people can, people in ter, when dealing with with when dealing ter, Sounds of the the of Sounds

a

reproduce n very telling aturally

ation events

CEU eTD Collection 93 2 92 91 Place,” of Sense a Performing 90 Studies Racial 89 religiously motivated, scholars function of a traditional ritual, pilgrimage precisely, While a ormore pilgrimage. isofcourse Finally, toattenda mereattend festival over it and the oraga decision over Guča as a form of pilgrimage ritual, which thereby angives it integra this described Victor important by themost scholar Turner,inthe1960s, onrituals, [canpassion [...] Durkheim inthe early 20 as a aformritual, where sense‘ of of Onemeaning ofthese to meansthan is wilfulconstruction. ways through other (at least officially)serve not to While at least onecase study probably most oneleast this case) in by gen sportsin extension Hungarians and Romanian example when –

Emile Durkheim, Emile Durkheim, See: . northern in music festival of a Belonging,” Collective of the Production and Sports, Holidays, Nation: the “Consuming Fox, Jon E. Victor Turner, Turner, Victor Ehrenreich, Barbara 3.

term

Guča is,differently from wi

th 29, no. 2 (2006): 219. 2 (2006): no. 29,

The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti and Structure Process: Ritual The

the temporal ofsocial elimination differences theparticipants ofa between be put into be putinto comparing The Elementary Forms of Religious Life Religious of Forms Elementary The ] cement] social bonds” Dancing in the Streets: A History of Collective Joy History Collective of A Streets: the in Dancing

. 89 . 90

Festival

th

Popular Music Popular

eral)mobilis isamuch stronger this national holidays and football competitions and competitions thereactionfootball ofnational holidaysand

s to them in Cluj s tothemin century

more e

any integrative function, have the sort of s , being culture popular sense, can part inthe of broadest . 91 long

collectiveeffervescence ffectiveas category, has Durkheim’s central argument was 19, no. 1 (2000): 51 1 (2000): no. 19, l and . Michelle Duffy, “Lines of Drift: Festival Participation and and FestivalParticipation Drift: of “Lines Duffy, Michelle 92

pointed ou pointed

A very concept similar is festivities , Romania

unifying function - 47 Structu

(New York: Free press, 1915). press, Free York: (New t re

analysedFox by Skey or , where it that

– (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966). Press, University Cornell (Ithaca: 64.

it

ing force holidays thanpublic

the motivations forthe motivations individual can nonethele

(New York: M (New York: ’ was already analysalready’ was . in the past 93 beco

also me s tha etropolitan Books, 2006), Books, etropolitan ss take onnationalist ss take

that of‘ that clear that football(orclear also beenalso shownin

in can takein onthe t “ritually induced , notintended view who defined communitas’ ed by Emile

Ethnic and Ethnic festivals

(at (at

CEU eTD Collection 98 Colloquium Celtic 97 Australia,” in Nationalism 96 95 3. 2000), Press, Illinois of University Chicago: 94 nationally integrating (besidesa function reflectingsense i ofnationness) rituals and national meaning, isclear it the questionwhether that ornot serves Guča a Taking connectionsconsiderations onthe these possible music, festivals, together between “[Guča] isthefeast flocking tothe ofpilgrims sanctuary tradition” ofnational has been heavily meani withnational loaded understanding, attheof and time pilgrimages the 20 ‘unpacked’ Australians infact is inAustralia created (through recentlyWard analys significance AustralianGalipoli for national of which identity, Mark McKenna Thereareexamples ofnational hand.One somepilgrimages at classic breaking themdown that pilgrimages f aritual (as studies therefore participants acannot in pilgrimage be

Mark McKenna and Stuart Ward, “‘It Was Really Moving, Mate’: The Gallipoli Pilgrimage and Sentimental Sentimental and Pilgrimage Gallipoli TheMate’: Moving, Really Was “‘It Ward, Stuart and McKenna Mark 4 Ibid., J.Sallnow, Michael and Eade John Novica Zatežić and Velimir Ilić, “Pucaj Trubo,” Trubo,” “Pucaj Ilić, Velimir and Zatežić Novica See: th

centuryIreland, traditionally Catholicism national where crucial self plays role a in John Shovlin, “Pilgrimage and the Construction of Irish National Identi National Irish of Construction the and “Pilgrimage Shovlin, John

in this field in this – 5. , amongst many other, amongstthings, many deliberately

in Galipoli byin Galipoli travellers Australian , no. 11 (1991). no. , also .

95 ed. In article,ed. for argue their thatthemeaning they ofGalipoli taken up taken Australian Historical Studies Historical Australian

started toquestion

orm) can just asorm) canjust well reinforceboundaries existing

before Contesting the Sacred: The Anthropology of Pilgrimage of Anthropology The Sacred: the Contesting ng , as o .

97 regarded also serve a nationalalso apurpose. serve Moreover,

Even inthe caseGuča, of the Večernje Novosti Večernje ne of the festival’s ofthe organis ne

Turner’s

48 38, no. 129 (2007):146. no. 38, .

96 as uniform

enhanced Another such 19 case wouldbe national original , December 8, 2007, 16. 2007, 8, December , any longer educ Anglo idea of idea ation and storytelling),tobe ty,” -

Irish becameconflict communitas Proceedings of the Harvard Harvard the of Proceedings ers once claimed that . 94 allegorya of case

Pilgrimagescan s of greats

here

(Urbana and and (Urbana . 98

und St subsequent instead of is the

, claiming th

and early

pilgrimage uart

CEU eTD Collection 103 1983). 102 101 100 Muziku I ScenskeUmetnosti Za Srpske Matice Zbornik 99 the brink ofextinction Serbia torevive musical this form, which organis The trumpet festivalmoreeven Guča isnaturally in recent an country. national liberationOttoman Empire fromfirst andwa the the as Therefore described‘Invented clearly can as be Tradition’ it an sense inthe Hobsbawmian afterI World War and from also the cities and towns Serbian prince dominant where the like clarinet instruments originally orchestras string classical andwere other Balkan being quintessentiallySerbian, brassWhile and music especially thetrumpetnat as a and music the brass Serbian especiallygiven by theaccountsfestival’s thevisitors. importance. bekeptwhen Thisshould mind thischapter in reading theremainderand of

Dimitrije Golemović, “Mesto i “Mesto Golemović, Dimitrije

Krsto Milanović and Dragan Babić, Babić, Dragan and Krsto Milanović Ranger, O. Terence and Hobsbawm Eric 104. U Evropu,” Simić, “EXIT 140 Tourism,” and Festivals Music Gligorijević,“World the first ofpopularis attempts

ed in 1961 by a grouped of a in1961by region. 19 Before the

. 99

The first court brass recorded was of in1831atthe orchestraformed the only

Obrenović, and it took until wellObrenović, into and tookuntil it the 20

subsequently at that time

Ulog th

to century, was music area brass rare oftoday’s Serbia, inthe a Limenih Dugovačkih Orkestara u Orkestara Dugovačkih Limenih a this Srpska Truba Srpska ing this musical genreing musical this

individuals the villages . 103

festival musical genre The Invention of Tradition of Invention The had its firsthigh its had

As a location

was, as a result ofthea was, Secondalready War, as World at

(Belgrade: Narodno delo, 2003), 135 2003), delo, Narodno (Belgrade:

from the Dragačevoregion south in .

100 in Guča 18, no.19 (1996). 18, 49

– The music infactThe only really became popular

141.

is in factis in for theirfor festival -

ional instrument have time between the two World betweentime thetwo

also

(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Press, University Cambridge (Cambridge:

th of coincide with the Serbiancoincide of wars withthe

Praksi Srbije,” Muzičkoj Narodnoj ves of nationinthe building ves of century tospread music for this

phenomenon. It phenomenon. first was rather recent originrather recent in they chose theythe tiny – 139. the

reputation of - western

Wars the . 101 ,

102

CEU eTD Collection 107 106 251. (2014): 105 62 (2012): Festival,” Trumpet Dragačevo the at Orchestras of Brass 104 the event ofone representation asa byreacted distrust tothis adopting apro distinct partisans,communist which furthercomplicated situation the movement, aparamilitarygroup (S loyaltheYugoslav to II War World Dragačevo regionalso theconnected strongly Chetnik with wastheSerbian strong onmodernisation, industrialisation emphasis and urbanis representedit andrural religiousnot well accepted values thatwere b prevailing cultural norms. organise yearsThe first of thefestivalwerecharacterised as by political commodification, of the now week attractingof the biggesttheworld, and in visitors 2,000bands around over the 800,000 course the genre sixteen years,to grow secondfollowing bands its to six in edition quickly inthe increasing the centres before brass thewar of music four active theregion in come play, bands actually and to Dragačevo used tobeone while of officially calle villageGuča of the inthe verycentreregion. first of The

Marković, “‘Guča Is Guča Is “‘Guča Marković, 252. Ibid., Fest Serbian a in History of Ethnicization and “Nationalism Waldemar Kuligowski, Lajić Danka and Zakić Mirjana

already The in the third. organiserstherefore rs .

105

had to adapt to the political situation in thepolitical situation Yugoslaviaadapt communist tothehad to adjust and to

and t d even for today,d lasted - oday long event long

,

the ’: Ideological Transformations of a Music Festival,” 80. Music Festival,” a of Transformations Ideological ’: From sabor - . Mihajlović, “(Re)creating the (folk Music) Tradition: The National Competition Competition The National Tradition: (folkMusic) the “(Re)creating Mihajlović, 106

the beginning, the statethe beginning, authoritiestrustthe event, didnot the as

in Guča brass isthebiggest

facet of Yugoslav identity, within the context of facet identity, ofYugoslav thecontext within just just . 104 one

Notwithstanding these 50

day and the organisandday the New Sound: International Magazine for Music Magazine International Sound: New -

Yugo

actually succeeded slav and even Titoist stance,and Titoist even slav erbian) fightingagainst king, the sabor . music festival Europe in and one 107

(assembly),as theevent is ation. Furthermore, during

The festival ers managed tofindonlyers issues

yregime, the which ival,” ival,”

in , the event, the their Anthropos ’s

organis aim torevive its its

branding and

the managed 1, no. 1 no. 1, , no. 39 no. , ers

put

CEU eTD Collection 108 and ofthese various combinations twoand mainly T symbols. more common itemsT are vendors, sellingall sortsofsouvenirs with As mentioned, thenationalist appearance the comes event from for of street part themost the past decades and to festival, theprocesses toanalyse setout of nationalis these questions,t slogans,why nationalist should songs and besopresent onthe streets? festival befilled withT streetvendorsflags, selling question could this simplyWhile beas viewed theaccuracy evidence the of these descriptions, of manycharacteristics id seems it most mind like of thenegative inconnection mentioned withGu points display onthe street symbols ofnationalist One ofthe first Nationalis Yugoslaviacommunist theoutbreak and civil war inthe of 1990s. official U ‘Brotherhoodand

Ibid.

- why The photoin shirts with different versions of the Serbian two ofthe withdifferentshirts Serbian versions ation of the festival of the ation

this is so is sois is this not easy aanswer. Whyshould to things visible toa visible things his section will, a his section will,

figure figure 1 entified discuss - shirts andshirts flags nity’ ideology

with belowof standonthestreets showsaGuča, typical selling the dynamics these developments. behind visitor fter givingfter the generalan into insight appearance of

the First Serbia

of the Guča festival rightafter . , 108

s ofthe town.Having theanalys varying

trumpet bearing the Serbian coloursbearing theSerbian

This was tochangeafter of collapse the 51

nationalistic connotations. Amongstnationalistic connotations. the - -

related symbols. shirts and shirts withnationalist other souvenirs are indeed ation thathaveactive inGuča been over - headed eagle, the Serbianheaded eagle, tricolours the seemingly brass music banal very very

present at the festival.present

To giveanswer or his

other nationalistic ed discourse in arrival theplain is čaalso and

s the

to

CEU eTD Collection current ‘heroes’ national the counterfeit ofDraža the Mihailović, the Chetnikmovement, leaderand also more of 2 figures However, therevendorsare selling as radical items well. other more nationalist The in photos Figure

and Figure

1: A typicalstreetA vendor 1: 3

below show

2 : T : he flag theflag he Kingdom Se of of such as the

i.a.

flags ofthe 19

on the streets on of

Bosnian rbia,just(2 aboveit Guča - Serbian warSerbian criminalRatkoMladić. 52 th

century T Kingdom ofSerbia,

nd

from the right) is T fromright) the a - shirtMihailović of - shirts bearingshirts

CEU eTD Collection (Kosovo theheart Serbia). is becan seen of such One scene inthe photoin popularsongs) themost among chants, nationalistic thembeing ‘ statue of manychants streets. on town’s the (or heard Especially mainsquare,around onthe on) ofSerbiancometotheforeAnother instancenationalism when festival notions at arethe the a

trumpet player, young togethertrumpet like player, tocome and visitors si Figure

3 : Upper: right –

a a T - shirt of Ratko MladićRatko shirt of 53

Kosovo je srce Srbije Kosovo je ng (amongst other figure figure 4

below. ”

CEU eTD Collection especially thewars on and statements official inCroatia Bosnia public life from theea ‘ is thealre One Serbian important dynamicsocietywhole as in a Folkloris recent The answersfestival general? in tothese festival’snationalistic, appearance howdidthis develop so easyin the framework targetofaccusation the As a theGuča result ofthisopenpresentationoffered ofnational festival symbols, itself Bordel Ratnika’

years Figure ation ady mentioned trendady of mentioned folkloris

and 4: youngstatue, people the 4: around gathering

will be dealt thefollowing bewithin will section. , he first rly 1980s on. Čolović’s main 1980son.Čolović’s argument that all politicalrly is events and outlined this trend, this outlined which manifested itself inallfields ofSerbian

questions questions ation, as described by Ivan describedInation, as Čolović. by book his 54 singing

Two Serbias lie in

and atGuča in the festival

the dynamicsguiding thefestivalin

and what does it sayit and does what abou discourse. But whyBut discourse. isthe

and Herzegovina

in particular

in the t the 19 as 90s an ,

CEU eTD Collection 114 113 157 2 (2003): 112 111 110 109 processethnicis of played a role in itself a is loaded with If themusicat played Guča describesresult ofthis the brassIn insuch canways. music framed revealing be a Lukić article,Miroslava been taken upby others After already NCFM Čolović named unity inunstable times autonomous processthis offolkloris composed folkmusic’ (NCFM) traces downtoculture, politics trend especially this from thevery so popular creatwere to framed contexts, inmythological

E.g: E.g: Lukić Hudson Robert 78:73. Ibid., 78:21. Ibid., Čolović, Krstić, “All Roads Lead to Guča.” to Lead Roads Krstić,“All nd it has often been notedalsothat thenational hasacademiand it oftenin been - the consumers. meta of doings and role bureaucratic national between positions, social and dominant achieved construction thanks playing, media Trumpet paradigm, power. to game: opposition power certain national a of space self the domination, order, homogeneous, in requirements the all fulfilled p Trumpet Krstanović, Bordell d Bordell – 76. , original,and rooted,means andas unspoiled aofcreating therefore could serve

such national also that significance,must this isclear it

, “Songs of Seduction: Popular Music and Serbian Nationalism,” Nationalism,” Serbian Music and Popular Seduction: of “Songs , the

er Krieger “Politika Trubaštva Trubaštva “Politika laying is like a protected sign and stamped symbol that has has that symbol stamped and sign protected a like is laying ation in great detail, and positions it in the ation in ingreat it detail, and positions ethnicis

113 . 111 ation, accordingisthatfolklore wasation, as seen toČolović, authentic, , 112

, 78:9. ,

process

it is it ation is in

, which later was to develop was, which later into to only logical

such a prominent position within Serbian within popularposition such a prominent cu of

- :

Folklor u Folklor

the festival

as one target ofthisfolkloris as one target

Prostoru Nacionalne Moći,” 205. Moći,” Nacionalne Prostoru

that also non that - 55 e some sort ofanciente some legitimis identification and at the same time, time, same the at and identification . 114

Waldemar Kuligowskianalysed this - newly early - Turbofolk composed folk music like music folk composed

ati is - 1990s, when thefestival1990s, o h folklore the to agae has language, ation of trumpet music on, a thathas notion also Patterns of Prejudice Patterns

apply to the festival . 110 - called ‘N

ation The reas - Krstanović . 109 lture and lture

He th ewly

on for 37, no. no. 37, en

CEU eTD Collection 118 117 116 http://www.anthroserbia.org/Content/PDF/Articles/a11b8432d9cf46f4a49da53a0b363d Magazine Anthropology 115 dynamics in items are omnipresent still attheevent subsequently yearAfter the festival 2000, thetrumpet Commercialis ethno processes, for continued have re a must different appearance described and inthe photos therefore, observations inthese whilerooted halted aftertheand endwars thefall of the ofMilošević is As identitya political that was circumstances consequence ofthe as changing therefo population, drawingespecially nationalistically minded people totheevent appreciation for thewas fromthe festival alsometwithgrowing thesidein official interest invested more funds was nationalist alsosupportedauthorities ofSerbia by the rump (or that thepre Yugoslavia started being toturnawayafrom pro

al Ibid., 82. Ibid., Ideolo Guča’: Is “‘Guča Marković, 253. Serbian Festival,” a in History of Ethnicization and “Nationalism Kuligowski, Wald Marković, so -

marketing come emar Kuligowski, “Nacionalizam o “Nacionalizam emar Kuligowski, clearlyto the broader connectedparadigm,folkloristic place 1990s took inthe re, toquote Aleksandrare, Marković,

-

and inCroat theongoing wars existing focus ontradition focus existing these recent years. recentthese These

grew to the immense size it istoday. it grewimmense size tothe Kuligowski andothers haverightly Kuligowski ati on and logicthe of World Music

11, no. 1 (2011): 74, no.1 (2011): 11, into the festivalever been than hadinto thecase.

into thepicture.into

gical Transformations of a Music Festival,” 81. Music Festival,” a of Transformations gical bičnih Ljudi: Ljudi: bičnih -

Yugoslav event Yugoslav

dynamic

started to

must must in Guča “ ia and Bosniaia and and Herzegovina provided a space for conceptualizing Serbian aconceptualizing provided space for therefore also 56 Etnicizacija Muzičke Tradicije na Primeru Sabora u Sabora Primeru na Tradicije Muzičke Etnicizacija s

can be broadly can subsumed under where Thisis ason. commercialis get started toopen started

noted, this processnoted, this ofethnicis T

he symbols answertowhy nationalist and reinterpreted ethnicity towards ,

as ofthe aresult breakup of . 118 be connected to its guiding its connected to be

The ongoing nationalist The ongoingnationalist

up to a wider publicup toawider and The - Yugoslavia), whonow

newlyfound . It . atthat time was ” . . 0c.pdf. 116 117

T ation, which he festival the banner of

ation . 115 and

This and

Guči,” Guči,”

then

CEU eTD Collection 122 121 120 119 countries intheregion again the and copies stereotypes many of by describedof scholars The term iswidely from ‘Balkan’ connection folkmusic Serbia used with and in other inevitable order tohighlight on ‘different’In music, and other of producers from theworld parts tocomplywiththis. have this genre Music World resulting Scholars have resulted ina adapt paradigm as this to inmany and other unique selling proposition plays amore Music ma Serbia are According toJelena The effectscommercialis of aremarket, points these twoselling difference which, a commercialis

See e.g: Search the and Music “World Haynes, 144. Tourism,” and Festivals Music Gligorijević,“World 308 Music,” World of Discourse “The Frith, kind of s Simon Frithp has s Simon stylis Guilbault, “On Redefining the ‘Local’ through World Music.” through ‘Local’ the Redefining “On Guilbault, . In. thecase of rketing . I . tradition music. Itmusic. theWestern is being public thatis ‘fore ‘strange’, sold n order for musicians, musicians, for n order certain prominent ation and have not failed tonote not failed a tion oftion ethnicity often . 120

is a British inventionfrom still is athemain 1980s,the is West market for and

stylis e’s difference, a difference, certaine’s stylis Gligorijević To visitors fromTo visitors outside thecountry, of notion however, the

role than mererole Asdifferencecan as tradition. seen be authenticity Serbia, enhanced is this byan ation of ethnicity s

of all folk, et ointed out,is ation haveapplied been tothe specificexample ofGuča before.

much todowiththeof logic

that this process of adaptation processthat this of to , the two key words in themarketing in , thetwokey the festival words of inside producers and event also organis for Difference,” 371. forDifference,” today

and thereforelargely ofWorld mirror the necessities involve – 315. hno and World Music, the Music, organisWorld hno and

mainlyguided bya search for absolutely crucial . 121

(mostly

57 a neo

ation of ethnicityand istherefore culture -

colonial facet non Orientalist or B Orientalist or - Western ethno .

119

- marketing the ) .

122 s ers to compete in a globalers ina tocompete tates, this tates, this world

Since theterm and alkanist facetalkanist aswell.

authenticity

ers of Guč and markets andthe ign’and in the end one of

W difference orld Music

and the a had to

,

CEU eTD Collection no. 24 (2004): 60 24 (2004): no. 123 hardlyInI section, this surprising. interviewees considering diverge significantly, which their different very b theroughWhile outline followed interview given similarpathsall cases, theanswers in by the connected tothe As describedfirst interview my chapterofpeople thisthesis, inthesample of consists the participants of Perceptions their the perceptions oftheinorder visitors, festival’s tosee nationa howthis prominent onnational public discussions in identity. turn let usnow Havingt inmind, this event,onto this markingnotonlyit as andas nationalistic making ethnic,but thefestivalthis wastone, butit the the nationalistically andvisitors supportfrom such parties minded together and with politicians, at1990s lie the heart o nationalist appearance of the stylisation of ethnicity, The other professionals These derivingabout are ideasthe Balkans inthe West additional notions Balkanism.Instead ofbeinggeog solely a

Ivan M. Čolović, “Balkan “Balkan Čolović, M. Ivan commercially necessitated heavy experiences

emphasis on – 62.

. festiv

of Two Ser Two in the region

authenticity, ethnicity and originality, of butalsoaprimitivism. sense al in differental asorganis ways: u Naraciji o World Muzici u Muzici World Naraciji o u combined with the foundations laid by withthe foundations combined paradigm folklore the the in authenticity and bias

emphasis on ethnicity giveemphasis onethnicity . discourse of thatfinally visions applied broader 123 am goingam to

tradition out ofmarketing out tradition logic raphic 58

Srbiji,” Srbiji,”

isolate theimportant recurring most themes al or musicologicalal

f the GučafestivalIts today. Novi Zvuk: Internacionalni Časopis Za Muziku Časopis Za Internacionalni Zvuk: Novi ers, musicians, local orvisitors. residents strongly the festivalastrongly ethnicis

mirrored bymusicians and

term, often it takes on lis that thenled toa a ackgrounds, is tion reflectstion in legacy the nation

of ed o ,

CEU eTD Collection 127 126 125 124 of different they stakeholders, arerelated ethnicity also sometimes oftradition, toquestions theseWhile c who only economicinterest see andnoother values” quality fallen ofthisfestival ofnewa has sharply,government, result people as intheregional commercial any like theworld” entertainment, festival other in Similarly: usedtobethis different,e.g.: generalthis out ofselling notion acommercial“[Guča] isjust spec largely lines followvery similar another, topic. guided my questions themtothis while noneinitial of because and theresulting discrepancyIt between authenticity and is profit. The notable by most recurringallis interviews the theme far inquestionof ofthenotions T coming upinthe interviewees’accounts, clusterscontras and definethematic 2014 August 7th Belgrade, 1, Interviewee Interviewee 5, Guča, 9th August 2014 August 9th Guča, 5, Interviewee 2014 August 9th Guča, 5, Interviewee 2014 August 7th Sad, Novi 2, Interviewee sell tons of meat and hectolitres of beer, the local government gets gets government local the tourists toattract of brand beer, of hectolitres state and the from subventions meat of tons sell to want owners restaurant the musicians, the of interest the in is audience broad A commercial. all is this Nowadays else. nothing was There quality. B

every single interviewee men efore the 90s this was a real festival, where orchestras could orchestras where festival, real a was this 90s the efore

“Serbian istoday culture a part small very of festival. this remained What ismainly omments targeted are at the mainly wo S erbias

and

nationalisation , criticising thefestival’ssell

is also combined with some sortwith some ofnostalgiaforis alsocombinedwhen times tacle. The most important thing sell” Theisto tacle. important most .

and the state has an interest to build some so some build to interest an has state the and 125

tioned the issue o tioned theissue

59

discuss

perceived sell perceived . 127 ed far. this f commercialis

- out 126 - out of the festival or out ofthe festival . One interviewee that states

and “in re particularly noteworthy Yet, t ation inoneway or show their their show he comments . commercialis 124 cent years, cent the t them with the t them with

In some rt rt failures

cases, ation

CEU eTD Collection 130 129 128 nostalgia plays instance: “T already a direction, inthis hints Serbian such brass music Guča. aspresent in music the comment concerning The above Ceca Theis alsooften issue ofauthenticityrelated to Se organis music. They,from the beginningtradition alive.” tothe end, the keep generations, national keep tradition aliveintheirplaces still the organis Another ‘expression intervieweethis of what situated we are’ nostalgia intrinsically andwhen nationhood, namely considerations shift

Interviewee 1, Belgrade, 7th August 2014 August 7th Belgrade, 1, Interviewee 2014 August 9th Guča, 5, Interviewee 2014 August 7th Sad, Novi 2, Interviewee rbian traditions,whileothers, ation that destroys whatationfor thatdestroys Guča stands ation, stating“others,who have thatlikethecaterersbusinesses runfor their music was on a high level. There weren’t this many oriental elements in in elements oriental many this weren’t Ex There level. know? high a you on was times, music golden the time, good a [referring to in up grown have I people amillion havehalf t real a was It culture. ar Serbian we what of of expression expression an really was it else. then anything Back or festival] the of edition year’s last at played who singer turb Serbian famous [a Ceca of nor meat, grilled of cabbage, stuffed of or beer, of festival a not was It trumpet. the of festival a be to used This at the times before at before the times hese Turbofolkists have Turbofolkists nothinghese Serbian todowith folkmusic” connected a role in this discussion as discussion in: a role inthis 70s and 80s 70s and80s

issue of issue this this

nd this issue isrepeatedly issue nd this taken For upbyinterviewees. my authenticity such as e! Today it is only commercialis only is it Today e! commercialis ex

o - Yugoslav rock music]. And back then also folk folk Andbackthenalso music]. rock Yugoslav attend

for instance for . . The citedin back interviewee looking above, 128

60

ation ation turbofolk (in order tosell)(in

from commercialisation added the caterers,

as :

the in ’ environment, food,drinkenvironment, and ’

antithesis to ‘authentic’antithesis to other other

and does not value real and does still still ed; an event that event an ed; 129 do. elements

It thereforethe is

towards the 130 ofolk , -

and also but the Yu Yu

CEU eTD Collection 135 134 133 132 131 something strange, exotic.” something sense like popularis so amongst “Igo isattractivecountry, thatit foreigners: think toawild to inthe intervieweeframed inaveryI this when why interesting him festival asked this way thinks he Serbian one brass hand, onthe music, But discourse toadichotomy referencesare totheorientalist notlimited ‘authentic’ between Serbian culture, songs partly from their elsewhere” or They [...] common withus. play playing “theycompletelyhave atareThey that a stating Guča, different nothing nation. in betweendistinction hisregion, bands, Serbian bands especiallyfrom Roma theand West, Guča] is musician inmyyou humoursaying the“[what samplesaw topic withabitof that here see in Eastern onthe and other Western hand styles instance interviewees burdenednegatively theheavily meaning is ofthe adjective ‘oriental’. For touches onanotherdiscussed before: topic ‘orientalis This

Interviewee 1, Belgrade, 7th August 2014 August 7th Belgrade, 1, Interviewee 2014 August 9th Guča, 4, Interviewee 2014 August 9th Guča, 4, Interviewee 2014 August 7th Sad, Novi 2, Interviewee 2014 August 7th Sad, Novi 2, Interviewee repeatedly Serbian style, still held on to this. This This held this. is Serbian style,onto still Trump turbofolk. no was there and music our : “T a

or alsoed’ southern Turbofolk, ‘come on, let’s goItgoing‘come toSerbiasomething’. India, on,let’s tosee abitlike is to see part of Serbi he southern school [of Serbian brass music] Serbianmusic] [of brass school he southern

mentioned

an culture.an Abital

dichotomy theo Serbian between on ‘authentic’ music

whatever they want, partlywhatever they songs are want, Serbian of that part

135 and brass Roma and music

so Turkish (laughs)so Turkish brassSerbian and music Orientalism – 61

they play authentic Serbian music” authenticthey Serbian play

truly

et music, especially its west its especially music, et our sound! . Anotionwidely shared by my has many elements. oriental The . 134 ” . 133

131

turbofolk He a also strong made Gypsy music Gypsy

, ontheother. One,

on theother - ne hand and . 132

The ,

CEU eTD Collection 138 137 136 even andpolitics, theoriginalidea used by oftheoften is festival s its betweendistinction nationalis did see thechanges inthe1990sas a Serbianthe wishpreserve folkculture and to nationalspirit tradition”. this However, with he asked abouthim it One ofthe festival of founders the was no givearebut still thea festivalnationalist today touch quite marginal heavenlybulwark of Serbs, Kosovo,etc. Christianity Guča some and “fools whobelieve thatthere inth exist derivefrom that time still way”.in this He furthermore fightingKosov for Guča was inthe“It earlyclose 90s: those those people toMilošević, savages whohad been festival. One complained interviewee about hownationalistically minded agents changed connection commercialis with its Another veryfrequent theme isthe festival’s

Interview 2014 August 8th Guča, 3, Interviewee 2014 August 7th Belgrade, 1, Interviewee t. Alocal resident cannot generalis indi by Guča, in nationalism of examples some be course national a has also this course Of tradition. folk something and culture national from preserve past, the from to created was It tradition. and arts culture, values, T he festival only wanted to preserve national identity, space, customs, customs, space, identity, national preserve to wanted only festival he ee 5, Guča, 9th August 2014 August 9th Guča, 5, ee . He methat told “from thebeginning o under the Theyo under slogan‘Serbs Kosovo’. for started

told me: told e ieso, ainl nt ainlsi! hr mgt of might There nationalistic! not national, dimension, this to the whole manifestation tothewhole this stated ation inthe 1990s,whichas isoften forced described from

ation as a main point ofcriticismpoint ation by as critical a main those ofthe

that theT form

t very upset about ethni this upset t very

of eth - appropriation from the political side 62 shirts and items available other nationalistic in shirts nicis

’ ation ” , while he also adds that these”also people ,whilehe adds , .

138 the festival was a renaissancethe festivalwas a of , which isoften named in

upporters tolegitimiseupporters viduals, but you you but viduals, . 136 cis rebranding

ation though . is story, ‘we

137 the festivalthe

Thi when Iwhen

the s

CEU eTD Collection 142 141 140 139 interviewee aski was direct,andwithout me more even at the ex EXITresulted needed else”,which something in Serbia”as “the aresult andsecond that does not enjoy of thepopulation part the music played years,Serbia” afterthe Milošević “somethingtoimprove tocreate urban theappearance of commented of onthe EXIT foundation as inthe it earlya 2000s, describing and thedichotomy the between anddirect previous final chapters.contains of cluster mention The the This far we connecting manydifferentin seen have clusters intothediscussions ways nation entered thetrumpet” more national culture a and became dominant form” againit damnwar themusic the1990s:“This changed to even Also another discus tookupthis interviewee trumpet in Guča connecting andonthefestival’sperception, their influence tothe ethnic it MyBelgrade interviewee presence in reflectedonthis ofnationalistically

Interviewee 1, Belgrade, 7th August 2014 August 7th Belgrade, 1, Interviewee 2014 August 8th Guča, 3, Interviewee 2014 August 7th Sad, Novi 2, Interviewee 2014 August 7th Belgrade, 1, Interviewee drastically eb wud’ sy ntig eaie bu Gč bcue t s thei is it because Guča about own negative anything say wouldn’t Serbs many why is that and own their with deal to like People OK. not already is that it, towards critical are and music this don’tlikeyou If tradition. our tradi our is which music, this against are you If otherwise. believes that group a in different be to hard very is It

music as such: . 139

, saying “the ofthe trumpetspirit , sayingnation enteredlike thespiritof the

. 141

Guča andEXIT

sion of trumpet music’s ethnicis 63 tion, you are automatically against against automatically are you tion, .

140 festivals. festivals.

The festival’s co ng for the discourse took it up: up: took it ng the discourse for tremeGuča growth of My

interviewee

itself - ! Brass music movedinto ! Brass founder framedfounder even this Two SerbiasTwo minded individuals minded individuals in Belgradein

“revenge of ation, connecting ”. r 142 is

discourse ation of

Another

this this

CEU eTD Collection 143 Also the definitionof theEXIT festivala Serbia revenge meani as(clearly of exotic andits largely this wildappeal, overlapswit interviewee Only in directlyechoed by my interviewees. Serbia and Guča the following donotpoint thesis, theories manyinthis ata ofthe introduced reflection of before many under collected points the ofthe recent notrelate of does directlynotion twoor development, more toany Serbias. Similarly, commerciali Serbias However, also itis the previousthesis are partsalso indeedfor ofimportant this thefestival’s ethnicis analy When summary Chapter

Interviewee 2, , 7th August 2014 August 7th Sad, Novi 2, Interviewee Two Serbias Serbias! Yugoslav Now too. EXIT culture to that go of wouldn’t part and are you mean doesn’t this Guča, to go you If music! trumpet adore I but today that play still I and Roll n Rock with up grew I EXIT? People veryfor similar! are they say I But or Guča for you are discussion, this always is there Serbia In

ation and theEXIT discourse. Most notably,discourse. thefestival’sparticipan Most some s s s

ing these broad c broad these ing explained the attractiveness of the festival to people theattractivenessexplained to from Western ofthefestival with Europe ation, which whilealready asation, which one ofthe between dynamics described Guča’s areas, 143

discourse inthe visitor’saccounts. discourse observed inthe literature, isthereforeobserved newspapers forum and posts some not new

apparent that those accounts the largelynotfollow lines ofthe do notions ofthe discourse doreflectnotions

-

wave band band wave - Guča dichotomy lusters of themes

from

cluster of while beingcluster Orientalism, interesting in

the ,

- between EKV [Ek EKV between

64 it shows thatmany the shows topics it of claim 19 -

commercialis 80s] and Ceca, that are two two are that Ceca, and 80s] h theOrientalist a of vision F The strong connectionbetweenFirst the

there are two Serbias, but no. Serbias,but theretwo are

directly ts do carets dothe issue of a about lot ation, authenticity, Ori . Forexample, when one . atarina Velika atarina

participants. ng of thepart the discussed in – irst Serbia.

a entalism, Two

of my of

CEU eTD Collection commercialis and are festival, or at debated lines concerning hotly beitalong Orientalist the bordersto beSerbian means of it what belonginggets along lines of reinterpreted the presumedgranted. and for taken not reflectaccountsparticipantsfestival’s intheare oftherather directly though, but targetaccusations theframeworkSerbias in for Two discour ofthe commerciallyyears, emphasis recent onethnicity necessitated an in Guča became obvious As a result oft candiscourseexpected that be does the pla clear asexplanations towhyevent, the in interviewees appropriation inthe to dovia drawingline abetween clear ‘pure’ the the case nationalistic connotation asexplanation towhy festival nationalistic the is none But even thediscourse though two Serbias. Serbian populationwhowas regime mirror against seems theMilošević theidea before) to of of noteven the interviewees, t

of its critics) or to defend itscritics) orto of

take the nationalist connotationof theGuča thenationalist take granted and fori festival ation. he festival’s past ethnicis festival’s (its he

19 90s. Thus,similarly90s. tothe scholars, .

This results in does

However the festivalthe

he criticalones,could most giveanyexample or concrete not directly reflect in most ofmynot directly most in reflect interviewees’accounts, . These issues are a major concern for all. Thesearea for interviewees major issues concern them either an interviewee’s , Guča, y this. into ation the inthe 1990sespecially)and **

65 (in the case which itssupporters), they(in the tend of authenticity reinforcing andthe tradition, *

, whileall ofthem sabor

can still beseen still can where as aplace national taking these accusationstaking these

as intended inthe

opinion, should be nationalistic, it should opinion, journalists anjournalists se. These accusationsse. These do were d forum users, d forum very 19 60s and its

for grantedfor (in

aware ofits the issue of the issueof n thelack of my

CEU eTD Collection guiding marketing dyn of everyday withqualitative ethnicity,research combined thean analysisfestivals and of clear connotations. nationalistic question remained Iglancehave hold,asand to withphotos descriptions. exemplified seem However, the discoursein public bothagainst theFirst generaland particular, Serbia thefestivalin at in first After geography, mu ofnotion Two Serbias also is routinelyapplied tonon down from thepolitical level that more to the mundane and shown have manifestations, shortcomings applica inits remarkablywell As a result, construction thediscursive ofby competingis conceptionsofthe nation now Serbias, whileexact seldomdefining meaning orquestioning thethisconcept. of works and journalistic articles,auth many discussionsin inpublic taking part Serbia. inscholarly ofthose both have We that seen scholars,even has andpublic journalists thewider becomea and taken Ithe trumpet festival Guča. in shownthat have thereinterviewsbetween Two andSerbias isaconnection observation, thediscourseon and As we seen have analyses inmy forumliterature, onscholarly newspapers, based entries, Conclusion

then turning to

sic and finallysic and andspecifically festivals established, evenholding thefaceestablished, in of ontoit tothe point ofobvious why this amics. The music itself has not been The not amics. musicitselfhas aanalysis matter here, of

this should bethe should casethis

specific case study tion. Departingfromtion. realis this

InI this, toanswer order relied theoretical framework onthe orsand repeatedly routinelyof notion Tworefer tothe , we seenmany have of that 66 and whyand for vendors, with sellitems instance, the overallthe

- political issues, suchpolitical issues, as demography, also ation, Iation, followed have thediscourse

discourse is well accepted by iswell discourse the Guča trumpet festival.the Guča trumpet - for

the accusationsthe made - granted notion for

while Iwhile

CEU eTD Collection marketand many thereare for radical them, still definitely atte nationalists often All this when tospeak planning theevent, not First ofa Serbia specific logic. Second Serbia itshistory because of and overall Two Serbias which discourse, itselftoaccusations offered coming adherents from ofa Having Guča findings inmind, these appears tobe marketing. the necessitiesemphasis of ethnicis forexplanations ongoing this the national colouring of themselves againstvague these and ill givingthey referenceand exactly, meant those supporting towhat urge felt it the todefend so that those critical simply ofit thefestival’sopen display blamed of Instead,and bothsupporters opponents ofthe nation discourseparts atby ofspecific at the Twowere times, Serbias andtopoint large unable Myw interviewees, fes music played havemusic in shownthat trumpet tival - mentioned street vendors would selltheir nationalistic not mentioned street products vendors there if no was alisticthe festival, elements criticalof ofnomatter how theevent. be they might It light inthis unli is

ation in the context ofthe broa ation inthe context as awhole is not tosay,is not course, thatthereare noradical of elementsinGuča. be to found The

at

Guča

and the talk about the festival in particular. talkaboutand the festival the in hile mirroringand discussed thesis referring inthis the topics many to of that mark the eventthat kely thatthefestival’sorganis ing ofmodern ethnicitycontext inthe Serbia - derdynamic Serbian folkloris of defined accusations. I given defined accusations. possible also have ethnic focus resultingfrofocus ethnic is in highlynationalis

national sabor 67

first andforemost

took its nationalist reputation nationalist took its for granted,

colours event, imp most ers follow anyers follownational ideology ed, buti

but rather the the but rather

- ideology. ethno m its m its t is not not t is so much the a space the projection of nationalism without without nationalism ation inthe 1990s, ation - ortantly history its of guiding marketing

and and

nding theevent,nding as setting ofthe World Music Music World

and

CEU eTD Collection 145 144 doexperiencevisitors of a collective belonging sense national inthi certainthe First characteristicsof Serbia applied arefestival discursively tothis andits There is for being those thoseattending, larger linkedidentities. without toany of necessarilyis not orethnic national butcantake rathertheforma temporary community of also keep inmind the nation becomes“knowable community” aattending. for those words ofMichael Skey,“solidarities thatare otherwi in the first chapter thisthes of InGučacan the theoretical sense,putinto framework this be ofethnicity everyday as outlined re placeofconceptions what wheremeans it be and to Serbian whatreally culture Serbian isare result ofitshistory, marketing its dynamics discursive andnational the colo be viewedstill where as aplace belongingattending. gets national those a for reinforced As nationalis However, while my basedcannotGuča on qualitativea data thatthe conclude is festival one of them. resonateat a allwith majority festival’s certainly ofthe itis participants,while knowntomost do so people with such convictions. a sortof from1990s,when leftover was themanifestation the a attimes meeting for point -

In the sense of Emile Durkheim or Victor Turner Victor or Durkheim Emile sense the In of S of “‘Carnivals Skey, evaluated. despite therefore

t happening, as is oftendonet happening,as inthe framework Two Serbias ofthe

its nationalistic colouring nationalistic its

that whilesomeform ofidentity identity‘happen’ this atdoes festival, this indeed more than one Serbia, but there moreindeed one thanone isalsomore but Guča. Serbia, than While urplus Emotion?,” 146 Emotion?,” urplus

is andmay as aplace function indeed where, to

However,Guča ofvisitorscoming the majority are to likelyto – , notbecau 147.

68

se ofit se se only are materialis presumed” . Thiscolouring may not therefore 144 s setting, theevent,s setting, the

However, one However, should

145 uring, Guča isa

discourse; again use the ed and ed and

it canit

CEU eTD Collection very different toeveryone things attending music and ofSerbness, notions while strongly intertwined

.

*** 69

in

this specificthis setting , still mea , still n

CEU eTD Collection Brubaker,Rogers. “Ethnicity without Groups.” In Božilović, Nikola. “Tradicija i Modernizacija (E Billig, Michael. Bakić Catherine.Baker, Anderson, Benedict. Literature “Guča: Svetska Atrakcija.” “GUČA Ili EXIT.” “Guča.” “GUČA.” “Exit Ili Guča???” Zatežić, Novica, and Velimir Ilić. “Pucaj Trubo.” Radun, Branko. “Kulturna ’Pink’Strategija.” Lengold, Jelena. K Koljević, Bogdana. Glig “Dačić: Srbija će čuvati Prijateljstvo s Čpajak, Biljana. “Srbija r Ćirjaković, Zoran. “Kako je Druga Srbija p Bazdulj, Muharem. “Hronika Najavljene Praznine.” Anto Primary sources Bibliography uljić,Todor. “Negrađanski u Rat orijevi nić, Slobodan. “Odgovor i Popovu - Hayden, Milica. “Nesting Orientalisms: The CaseFormer of Yugoslavia.” gu%C4%8Da. h http://www.politika.rs/pogledi/Todor http://www.vreme.rs/cms/view.p http://www.vreme.rs/cms/view.php?id=1056445. Gaspromu.lt.html. http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Ekonomija/Dacic priblizile December24, 2012. http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Politika/Srbija http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Komentari/Kako http://www.vreme.rs/cms/view.php?id=1241918. 2004. no.52, (2010):2 113 (1995). 1991 EXIT. Krstarica Forum Krstarica Blog ttp://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Pogledi ć, Jelena.ć, “Boris Tadići Klub n

. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2010.

Banal Nationalism

Krstarica Forum “Plemenska Pitanja.” - nacionalna Krstarica Forum Soundsof theBorderland: Popular Music, War, and Nationalismin Croatia since “Zašto j Imagined Communities

, azgovara: Koli forum.krstarica.com/entry.php/8739 , www.forum e Noe Forum - – i - 26. gradjanska vak Đoković vak d ,

-

forum.krstarica.com/showthread.php/158036 . London: SAGE, 1995. Građanskoj Srbiji.” , Srbija forum.krstarica.com/showthread.php/393466

Rusijom.” - ko približilesu se Nacionalna i Politika.rs srbija.com/showthread.php/164734

Dereti.” , eodgovornih Intelektualaca.”

ostala Prva.” www.forum - opcija.lt.html. hp?id=992499. Nova Srpska Politička Misao . 3rd ed. anas Srbija.” vropske Perspektive Kulture - Kuljich/Negradjanski

- Večernje Novosti Politika.rs Vreme sa , May 21, 2013. Ethnicity with 70 - strane/Plemenska Nedeljnik Vreme

Politika.rs London: Verso, 2006. - srbija.com/viewtopic.php?f=253&t=8786. Politika.rs .

October 4, 2003.

- - je

, July 10, 2014. Udeo Nedeljnik Vreme

- Druga - GU%C4%8CA. , August 15, 2013. out Groups - u , November21, 2014. , December - - Petrohemiji Srbija - , June 11, 2014.

rat Građanska Opcija.” - Nedeljnik Vreme pitanja.lt.html. - u -

, Special no. edition 1 (2008). postala - gradjanskoj . Harvard University Press, n

, May 26, 2011. - - a Balkanu).” razg GU%C4%8Da.

8, 8, 2007. - Slavic Review na ovara - - GU%C4%8CA - prva.lt.html. - ime exit

- - - - , July 6, 2012. duga koliko Srbiji.lt.html. ili - Sociologija Politika

-

54, no. 4 - su

- ili - . se

- -

CEU eTD Collection Krstić, Marija. “All Roads Lead to Guča: Modes of Representing Serbia and Serbs duringGuča the Kong, andLily, Brenda Yeoh. “The Construction of National Identity through the Production Ritualof Hudson, Robert. “Songs of Seduction: Popular Mus Hobsbawm, Eric,and TerenceO. Ranger. Haynes,Jo. “World Music andSearch the for Difference.” Harnish, David. “NewLines, Shifting Identities: Interpreting Changeat the Lingsar Festival in Lombok, Guilbault, Iocelyne. “On Green, Sarah F. Gordy, Eric D. “Reflecting on‘Culture The of Power’, Ten Years On.” Gordy, Eric. Golemović, Dimitrije. “Mesto i Gligorijević, Jelena. “World Festivals Music and Tourism: ACase Study Serbia’sof Guc Frith, Simon. “The Discourseof World Music.” In Jon Fox, and E., Cynthia Miller Jon Fox, E. “Consuming the Nation: Holidays, Sports,and Production the Collectiveof Belonging.” Fleming, K. E. Ehrenreich, Barbara. Edensor, Tim. Eade, John, and Michael J. Sallnow. Durkheim, Emile. Duffy, Michelle. “Lines of Drift: Festival Participation and PerformingSense a of Place.” Comaroff, John andL., Jean Comaroff. Čolović, Ivan M. “Balkan Čolović, Ivan,and Mimica Aljoša. Čolović, Ivan. AnthonyCohen, P. Buchanan, Donna A. “Soccer,Popular Music and National Consciousnessin Post Brubaker,Rogers, and FrederickCooper. “Beyond ‘identity.’” In Srbije.” Festival.” Californiaof Press, 2000. Ethnic and Racial Studies Princeton University Press, 1999. Books, 2006. Publishers, 2002. and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2000. no.19, (2000):1 51 Muziku Borba, 1992. Bulgaria, 1994 University Press, 2004. Trumpet Festival.” (1997):3 213 and Spectacle: An Analysis Nationalof Day Parades in Singapore.” no.37, (2003):2 157 University Press, 1983. Indonesia.” Contemporary Reader Border Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History University Park, PA: ThePennsylvania State University Press, 1999. The Culture of Power in Serbia: Nationalismand the Destruction of Alternatives Bordell der Krieger: Folklore, Politiku The MuslimBonaparte: Diplomacy and Orientalismin Ali GreecePasha’s National Identity,Popular Culture and . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005. , no. , no. 24 (2004): 59 Notes from theBalkans: Locating Marginality and Ambiguity on the Greek ZbornikMatice Srpske z The Element International Journal ofCultural Policy Symbolic Construction of Community Ethnomusicology

Dancing intheStreets: AHistory of Collective Joy – – 39. 96.” Redefining‘Local’ the through World Music.” In u Naraciji o World Muzici u

Nova Srpska Anropologija – British Journal ofEthnomusicology 64. – - 76. . NewYork: Routledge, 2006. ary Formsary ofReligious Life

Idriss. “Everyday Nationh

Uloga Limenih Dugovačkih Orkesta

Druga Srbija, Zbornik Tekstova 29, no. 2 (2006): 217 – 62. Contesting the Sacred: The Anthropology ofPilgrimage

49 49 (2005)

Ethnicity, Inc. a Scenske Umetnosti

The Invention ofTradition .

Western Music and i 71 nd Krieg ic and Serbian Nationalism.”

Srbiji.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009. Everyday Life

3 (2012): 163 , no. 1 (2005): 11

– 36. . ood.”

. New York: Free press, 1915. 20, no. 2 (2012): 139 London: Routledge, 1995. Ethnicities

. Vol. 78. Osnabrück: fibre,199

Novi i

Muziku Ethnicities

11, no. (2002):2 1

. Belgrade: Beogradski krug, Plato, Ethnicity without Groups

Zvuk: Internacionalni Časopis z ra u . Oxford; New York: Berg – . Cambridge: Cambridge 86. Facta Universitatis 5, no.5, 3 (2005): 365

ts Others

. NewYork: Metropolitan 18, no. 19 (19 Narodnoj Muzičkoj Praksi –

19.

Ethnomusicology:A 8, no. (2008):4 536 Political Ge

– . Berkeley: University 54. Patterns of Prejudice - State –

27.

96). a Trumpet

ography -

. Sociali - Princeton, NJ: Popular Music

– Series . Harvard 85. - 4. Albanian . Urbana .

st 63.

16, no.16, a

CEU eTD Collection Živković, Marko. “StoriesSerbs Tell Themselves: Discourseson Identity and Destiny inSerbi Zakić, Mirjana, and Danka Lajić Wodak, Ruth. Turner,Victor. Todorova, Maria. Stokes, Martin, and others. ——— Skey, Michael. “‘Carnivals of Surplus Emotion?’. Towards anUnderstan Simić, Marina. “EXIT uEvropu: Popularna Muzika iPolitike Identiteta u Shovlin, John. “Pilgrimage andConstruction the Irishof National Identity.” Said, Edward W. Risti Rice, Timothy. “Reflections Musicon and Identity inEthnomusicology.” Petrović, Tamar Petrović, Dragoslav. “Mesto: Milanović, Krsto, and Dragan Babić. McKenna, Mark, and Stuart Ward. “‘It Was Really Moving, Mate’: GallipoliThe Matthew, Collin. Marković,Aleksandra. “‘GučaGuča’: Is Ideological Transformations of a Music Festival.” ——— Lukić Lazić, Mladen. “Serbia: A Part of Both the East and theWest?” ——— Kulig vojević, Marija. owski, Waldemar. “Nacionalizam O - Krstanović, Miroslava. . “The Festival Order: MusicStages of Powerand Pleasure?” . “Nationalism and Ethnicization Historyof ina Serbian Festival.” . National Belonging and Everyday Life: The Significance of Nationhood inan Uncertain World Ecstatic Nationalism in aGlobalising World.” 116no. Harvard Celtic Colloquium 13 (2009): 117 44. Niš, of 2012. 51. Sentimental Nationalism in Australia.” ed. London: Serpent’s tail, 2004. Festkultur Feiern, Rituale i (2008):3 129 Radova Etnografskog Instituta SANU u the Mid International Magazine for Music Competition Brassof Orchestras atthe Dragačevo Trumpet Festival.” 2009. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1997. New York: Palgrave Macm (2006): 143

Guči.”

The Discursive Construction ofNational Identity The R – a, and Ivana Spasić. “Varijante - Anthropology Magazine 1980s.” 117 (2007): 98 Orientalism This Is Serbia Calling: Rock’n’Roll Radio and Belgrade’s Underground Resistance Imagining theBalkans . Vienna, Zurich, Berlin, Münster: LIT, 2009. – “Uloga Muzikeu

itual Process: Structure and Anti 61. – 43. – m Östlichen Europa: Studien Zur Sozialistischen 30.

Problems of Post

Ethnicity, Identity and Music: The Musical Construction ofPlace

“PolitikaTrubaštva . New York: Vintage, 1979.

Domašaj ‘Dragačevskog Sabora’ u - – Mihajlović. “(Re)creating( the 122. , 11no. (1991). illan, 2011. Srpska Truba

Konstrukciji Etničkog Identiteta.”

. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. bičnih Ljudi:

11, no.11, (2011).1 , no. 39 (2012). - Communism

22 (2006): 169

TrećeSrbije’.” Australian Historical Studies -

. Belgrade: Narodno delo, 2003.

Folklor u 72

- Etnicizacija Studies inEthnicity and Nationalism Structure

44, no. (1997): 4 22

Prostoru Nacionalne Moći.” – 87. Filozofija I Društvo

folk Music) Tradition:National The . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, . Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966. Sociologij

Ku

MuzičkeTradicije naPrimeru Sabora lturnom Milijeu Srbije.” University Etnoantropološ

Etnološko ding theof Significanceof Savremenoj Srbiji.” u Ethnomusicology Anthropos a nd Post

45, no. (2003): 3 193 Pro

– 38, no. 129 (2007): 141 29. New Sound: ceedingsof the

Pilgrimage and

- 23, no.23, (2012):3 23 - Sozialistischen

Antropološke Sveske

ki Problemi 1, no. (2014).1 Zbornik In

7 (2007).7 6, no.6, 2

Kultura Feste, . 2nd ed. a since

3, no. – 216. . 2nd

,

– – .