News Coverage of Domestic Violence in Serbia

CEU eTD Collection

In partial In fulfil News CoverageDomesticNews of V l ment of therequirements for the degreeofMaster of Arts Supervisor: Departmentof Political Science Central European University Budapest,Hungary in Politicalin Science Milos ResimicMilos Submitted to ProfessorRobert Sata 2014 By

iolence in Serbiaiolence in

CEU eTD Collection society of norms social patriarchal embedded the reflect that tastes readership the to content violence The to respect dailies the of orientation logic own its has media the that suggest analysis framing the of results The responsibl quantita the of results periods medi of type and extent the both capture to qua and analysis content “second merely than rather theory media separate being framing for arguing authors of position the adopt hence and research, my for theory for framework

thesis concludes thesis , thesis this In that still needthat still tochan

befo than changing how the issue is issue the how changing than e coverage of domestic violence, especially for especially violence, domestic of coverage e framing domestic violence domestic framing e n atr h aoto of adoption the after and re

coverage of coverage

tive content analysis content tive that I investigate investigate I

litative framin litative and the resulting sensationalist resulting the and

it seems easier seems it

dom ge.

estic violence in Serbia. in violence estic h efcs of effects the , except in the case the in except , g analysis on analysis g

Abstract

framed because editorial boards editorial because framed to influence to

suggest eeat tt plce ad cin programs action and policies state relevant cvrg o dmsi voec in violence domestic of coverage a i

media new a imposing in influence state that there is a positive shift towards shift positive a is there that -

ee” gna setting. agenda level” three national daily newspapers daily national three

the content of articles about articles of content the

tone

semi of the more analytic more the of I start from framing as a baseline baseline a as framing from start I prevent - tabloid s

a meaningful shift with shift meaningful a Blic

adjust newspapers adjust and tabloid and ue quantitative use I

daily ,

n m and

two time time two domestic

Politika

in order in Serbian Kurir

. more arket

The The . .

CEU eTD Collection passionforthis myhelped club gamesyelling but screaming during Iwith and the Iannoyed myneighborsEuroleague. know to and Serbia in title champions to like would I Finally, Raluca, life academic everyday of correctness political I all thehelp, she gave love and support me. B visiting was I when lap only his me to morally, and financially me supporting for parents my To me. gave they to parents, my to thank to like would I lucky competence a withboth tohave supervisor goodand ofhumor. sense process his Also, placement. articles definite my e my on replies quick Robert supervisor my to thank to like would I ol lk t mention to like would

Ela, n h md a iprat otiuin o h qaiy f h tei. ial, was I Finally, thesis. the of quality the to contribution important an made he and

Nemanja Matej, Juraj Nemanja Matej, top to use it at the CEU, and to my sisters, for all the wonderful meals I had I meals wonderful the all for sisters, my to and CEU, the at it use to top - elgrade during this academic year. academic this during elgrade mails during the thesis writing process and for his patience to correct correct to patience his for and process writing thesis the during mails

take a ml gop f epe ih hm ocsoal ecpd from escaped occasionally I whom with people of group small

this opportunity and congratulate to FC Red Star on the new new the on Star Red FC to congratulate and opportunity this me the

Acknowledgments and Stas. to remain focused andto remainjobwell domy here at the CEU. basketball club Red Star for all for Star Red club basketball my brother Nenad and to my sisters for all support support all for sisters my to and Nenad brother my advices were extremely helpful during the writing the during helpful extremely were advices

Sata for several reasons. I am th am I reasons. several for Sata

. t was It

pesr hnig u wt: Ana, with: out hanging pleasure a Also, I am thankful to Kristina for Kristina to thankful am I Also,

amazing games in games amazing Nenad, who gave gave who Nenad,

ankful for his for ankful

the

CEU eTD Collection thereadershippleasing Chapter 6 and where are weknow? Chapter 5 Chapter 4 Chapter 3 Chapter 2 Chapter 1 Acknowledgments Abstract Table Contentsof 6.2 The preserving useofsourcesin domestic on stereotypes violence frame6.1 Justificational 5.2 Discussion 5.1 Results 4.1 Sample coveragedomestic violence of 2.2 and domestic Media violence: 2.1 women: of Violence against theproblem capturing theessence towards coverage responsible violence ofdomestic 6.2.2 Including frame6.2.1 “status maintaining Thequo” in role of identificational way coveragedomestic towards responsible violence? of 6.1.2 From justifyingtocondemning thecrime: perpetrators where we onthe are quo” 6.1.1 violence Justifyingor the“status domestic keeping

...... - – – – – -

Teaching journalistsondomestic reviewLiterature and theory building Framing domestic violence coverage: between changing violence coverage:between stereotypesFraming domestic and coverage ofnewspapers The state ofdomestic violence Methodology Introduction

......

...... more sources to address domestic violence as a socialproblem: violence asa more toaddress domestic sources

......

Towards a baseline theoryTowards for abaseline news analyzing ...... iii

...... violence coverage ......

......

...... -

...... Where wereWhere we

......

16 10 52 49 49 46 42 42 42 38 25 25 22 19

ii 8 8 1

CEU eTD Collection Primary Bibliography Appendix Chapter 7 6.4 Discussion in it way?present that 6.3 Examining documents

...... –

Conclusion

......

societal frame: Domestic violence is a social problem but asocial frame: is societal Domestic do violence themedia ......

......

...... iv

......

75 73 64 61 58 55

CEU eTD Collection articles 1 Discrimination of Forms All of Elimination the on Convention the as such women against and (Babovic al et Serbia 2011, Ostojic violence physical of victim Serbia of Society Victimology especially since problem serious very a is violence domestic of ignorance and portrayal this membership, any without society, in r women of position subordinated the reinforcing stereotypical, this as violence, domestic internat because not intolerable. something wife, his on axe an used abuser because only (P.R. television watching was she while wife his hit and house the in back came axe, an took admitted also He axe. an with wife his hit to daily Serbian the of 2006

ecognition of domestic violence as a social problem. social a as violence domestic of ecognition Newspaper

a -

D.M ’ signatory of practically all relevant conventions dealing with the problem of violence of problem the with dealing conventions relevant all practically of signatory

excerpts are mine are excerpts h frt miia suy n oetc ilne n eba conducted Serbia in violence domestic on study empirical first The “ ional agreements condemning violence against women and more specifically forms of of forms specifically more and women against violence condemning agreements ional ee itm o sm fr o dmsi viole domestic of form some of victims were takdhs iewt n x”ra h il fa ril ulse nJnay 5, January in published article an of title the read axe” an with wife his Attacked ). s

rils nlzd r pbihd n Serbian. in published are analyzed articles snainls soy n ilne gis wmn prryd s extraordinary as portrayed women, against violence on story sensationalist A

. 20)

2010 this form ofviolence form this . A . ,

more recent study from 2009 showed that more than more that showed 2009 from study recent more 45) .

Although by this time Serbia has signed and ratified a number of of number a ratified and signed has Serbia time this by Although .

As a Kurir.

excerpt within

Chapter1

member state of the Council of Europe and the United Nations and Europe of Council the statemember of

n 2 in Readers were shared the story that story the shared were Readers

the hw, ei cvrg o dmsi voec remained violence domestic of coverage media shows,

0 soe that showed 001 is widespread into all segments into is widespread ofsoc

family or family –

Introduction 1 that he that

an intimate partner intimate an Unless otherwise indicated, all translations of the the of translations all indicated, otherwise Unless

was drinking that night that drinking was

For Serbia, a country aspiring for EU EU for aspiring country a Serbia, For n i tre wome three in one c a lat ne n hi lifetime their in once least at nce

ilne gis women against violence

“ relation Milosavljevic admitted Milosavljevic a n iety. half of women of half

ship … n Serbia in

He stoo He

(Muric and and (Muric

y the by

a a was d up, d

” in is is 1

CEU eTD Collection 2 portrayedthe media.and covered in signatory, of issue the account into take would which professionals, media for conduct of codes of elaboration the “encourage should states duties, equal 2002 from gender Recommendation of spirit the in represented violence women against chapter the of beginning the from excerpt way the is matters equally least covering merely women against violence change achieving for coverage soc the of one is women against Violence framed. 2005, (see well as it about t to how us suggesting in but about think to what us telling in only not is role media’s that argued recently McCombs notion, this beyond Going perception. this of illustration te certainly they but think to what us tell role important society. in position women’s improving stereotypes relations and patriarchal issues equality gender and women against violence Women Against

Available from Available Binding conventions conventions Binding in women of Representation eba a olgd o hne h wy ht su of issue that way the change to obliged was Serbia :

https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=280915 in shaping public opinion. opinion. public shaping in (CEDAW),

was highly andincident stereotyped,based. sensationalist

546). ebaws rsue o show to pressured was Serbia

in the section referring to referring section the in that

both in policy and society and policy in both

o these how

eba ind lal dmn ta wmn hud be should women that demand clearly signed Serbia

. ned cran sus agl dpn o hw hy are they how on depend largely issues certain Indeed,

the

Cohen’s ae on Based ll us what to what us ll different cases different media is one of the most most the of one is media

violence against women…” against violence ugss the suggests,

2 cases ity. ity.

famous

, last accessed on May 20, 2014. Mayon20, lastaccessed ,

o e For and show progress in dealing with gender with dealing in progress show and agenda a polm ta haiy rely heavily that problems ial r covered are

think about ( about think

the the . However, for sensitive issues like issues sensitive for However, . of violence of

xample, the Council of Europe Europe of Council the xample, argument that argument Serbian - etn ter, th theory, setting media, states that states media, a imsado h rbe of problem the on stand firm

n framed. and ilne gis women against violence newspapers’ coverage of of coverage newspapers’

1963) is an appropriate an is 1963) is not enough. What at What enough. not is

( motn plas in pillars important the the 2002 media might not not might media e

)

, among other other among , As . media 2

Hence,

h article the n media on

a an has hink as a as the

CEU eTD Collection 2014. April 24, on lastaccessed 4 UNAPRE%C3%90IVANJE STRATEGIJA 3 framing policies state relevant the of adoption the after and before exploring violence domestic trainings journalists onviolence women for 2011. coverage, against 2009to from organized sanctioning and monitoring continuous (d) 2011), Djorgovic and (Aleksic journalists for women against violence and violence domestic of articles an stereotypes gender remove to aimed with articles more produce to encouragement (a) were: activities main the personnel number a media, the in women of perception the improving on activities the of part As media. the relations partner intimate in and family the in women against violence combating with deals first The research. my for relevant are two which of Plans, Action National six of consists Strategy The 64). (2009, har women violence, domestic as such topics approach sensationalism without and respectfully the to media of the “…influence to goals was Strategy major the of One women. against violence on focus specific with coverage (hereinafter:

Document in Serbian available from: from: available Serbian in Document ouet n eba aalbe from: available Serbian in Document

In related to removal of gend of removal to related What were the effects of the state influence in imposing in influence state the of effects the were What f ocee oiis n ato programs action and policies concrete of rm media from

. how 2009 In the N Inthe - the ZA the media the , Serbia adopted the adopted Serbia , - POBOLJ% Strategy), Strategy),

issue ational action plan aimed at removing gender stereotypes in media, among among media, in genderstereotypes removing at aimed plan action ational

hoy s bsln fr y resea my for baseline a as theory - s RODNE

in Serbia in hips and the second deals with removing gender stereotypes from from stereotypes gender removing with deals second the and hips C5%A0ANJE covers and frames and covers

a policy document aimed at aimed document policy a

- RAVNOPRAVNOSTI.pdf http://www.gendernet.rs/files/doku er stereotypes, (c) creating a creating (c) stereotypes, er ? This question will be the central foc central the be will question This ? http://www.cmv.org.rs/wp ainl taeyfr dacmn o gne equality gender of advancement for Strategy National - POLO%C5%BDAJA msgn, b etbihn an establishing (b) misogyny, d

violence against women in Serbia in the periods the in Serbia in women against violence assment, human trafficking and sex trafficking” trafficking” sex and trafficking human assment, 3

discriminatory media coverage media discriminatory , last accessed on April 24 2014. April 24 on lastaccessed , ee raie atr 09 o news for 2009 after organized were removing gender stereotypes in media in stereotypes gender removing - %C5%BDENA - content/uploads/2012/12/NACIONALNA rch. In arguing for framing as a a as framing for arguing In rch.

and action programs action and menta/Domaci/NAP.pdf

Handbook on media coverage media on Handbook a new media framework for framework media new a - I - us of my research in in research my of us

annual award for for award annual a

oil focus social , pp. 124 pp. , . I will use will I . 4

a nd (e) nd - 141,

3 -

CEU eTD Collection newswithin articles. and are, Serbia state in whether newspapers stereotyped incident how the indicate will to analysis than the rather Furthermore, problem the of implications social broader towards problem social a as women against violence presenting articles of number larger significantly a example, For women. against violence of problem in will public new women. against violence year the against women inthe post hopefully will correspondin and norms wo against violence rather that seems it Namely, example. be to seems Serbia countries, theWestern media agendaresearch in Contrary on to specifically and 1993).1999; Entman agenda between argueequivalence who andfor those it of extension framingan as and coretheory a as setting agenda for arguing scholars between debates the evaluate will I point, starting theoretical

dicate that the media framework has shifted towards shifted has framework media the that dicate hn h mda pressured media the than As shown above, 2009 is taken as a critical junct critical a as taken is 2009 above, shown As this of aim The

the strategy show more of the indicators of responsible media coverage. If so, that so, If coverage. media responsible of indicators the of more show strategy

Serbian policies e go satn pit for point starting good a be - setting and framing a framing and setting the the men

effect of state policies on media coverage of violence against women. women. against violence of coverage media on policies state of effect

sta thesis influenced

g media coverage called for new for called coverage media g esatdt cope to started te which was often the case in Western Europe, where changing social social changing where Europe, Western in case the often was which My aim is to answer to is aim My - communist context. context. communist

is to assess the overall direction of the effectthe of direction overall the assess to is the the any s media effect theories (see McCombs 2004; Scheufele 2004; McCombs (see theories effect media s tt t cag is oiis regarding policies its change to state state provided provided state

oiie hne in change positive

seriously

uue eerh on research future

4 whether news articles after the adoption of the the of adoption the after articles news whether

ih h rbe of problem the with a oe epnil mda framework, media responsible more ure

policies

ih indicate might for this research this for h reducing the more syste more

media coverage of violence violence of coverage media . Accordingly, this r this Accordingly, matic approach of approach matic

gender of of how media covers media how ei orien media

because this was this because policy on media on policy h polm of problem the

stereotypes stereotypes a different different esearch tation tation itself

the - .

CEU eTD Collection violence the adoption of thestrateg but literature polic state of effects the evaluate policies. state the of effect potential the with deal not did analysis this However, 2013). (Mrsevic year last published of coverage gender of maintenance the to contributed stereotypes structure and society. ofSerbian patriarchal only thus problem social the of ignorance incident stereotyped highly was women against violence of coverage News women not was women against violence of problem framework the for media

RQ1 The mainresearch question S in the family the in wl age that argue will I

bas far o in Serbia?    ed stories without without stories ed

: What were the effects of the state’s influence on the news coverage of coverageof news the on influence state’s the of effects the were What : violence against women against violence

it will show whether show will it newspapers? newspapers? in differences there Are social story cha a there Was comparing periods twotime of coverage of amount the with happened What hr is there

was not even a criminal act in the Serbian Criminal Code before 2002. 2002. before Code Criminal Serbian the in act criminal a even not was

o research no

with regards to violence against womenwith regards toviolence y. the ?

Hence

e sae oiis and policies state new any nge in the amount of of amount the in nge , this this , ies and ies

eng media coverage of violence against women changed after after changed women against violence of coverage media is

measuring agement with the social aspect social the with agement in Serbia in thesis

hs otiuent nyb fligti gpi the in gap this filling by only not contribute thus h aon o cvrg bten h analyzed the between coverage of amount the , three 2006 in months will b will 5

addressed at all. Namely, violence against against violence Namely, all. at addressed One qualitative qualitative One the effect of of effect the e the first research aimed to discover and and discover to aimed research first the e stories covering domestic violence as a as violence domestic covering stories the

Strategy provided provided Strategy the . Before the new policies the Before policies thenew .

analysis and oetc violence domestic stat , with predominance of of predominance with , of the problem. the of

three 2013 in months e policies on media media on policies e

of the subject the of a e enriched new domestic domestic

Media’s Media’s

when

was was ?

CEU eTD Collection research use to possibility the and flexibility its to due convenient for method logical a socialfrequencies incident and based of media before women against violence of coverage ef about information provide to aimed is analysis The period months three in newspapers qualitative and analysis content quantitative criminal consequences the abuser. for crime ( legal frameworkvictims for as such aspect, sensationalist than rather factual based. domestic violence

. Moreover, I will try to explain explain tryto I will Moreover, . by analyzing media analyzing by e.g. alcohole.g. n re t ase te eerh qu research the answer to order In H5: H4 H3: H2 H1 The main hypothese .

As such, I will develop will I such, As : The majority of articles regarding articles of majority The : be will There : :

There will be more articles in the second second the in articles more be will There more be will There There will be fewer articles in the second period second the in articles fewer be will There

after 2009 inallanalyzedafter 2009 newspapers. ab testing use , jealousy, poverty).

content. s

and sources expert quoted. framing as a media effect theory. Qualitative theory. effect media a as framing an that follow are: follow that

articles in the second second the in articles nrae in increase

indicators of responsible media coverage when analyzing when coverage media responsible of indicators s

Quantitative content analysis is relevant for show for relevant is analysis content Quantitative , before and after the adoption of the new state policies. state new the of adoption the after and before ,

not only whether but also how state policiesstate how onlyalso whethernot but n Serbia in

focus

h nme o social of number the sin n t ts the test to and estion

6 articles domestic violence domestic

rmn aayi on analysis framing statistics of crimes of statistics rvdn nw aa ht a nt collected not was that data new providing , whereas qualitative , whereas time time time time

fects of the state policies on the news news the on policies state the of fects

period it in it on information contain that period

that both inductive and deductive deductive and inductive both

before 2009 will be incident be will 2009 before that

, cont

f available services available ocus

hypothese contain information on information contain he ntoa daily national three i jsiiain for justifications ain

framing framing rils regarding articles s ,

wl use will I influence analysis is analysis analysis is analysis is ing the ing

and a and d

CEU eTD Collection prominent f most chapter sixth the Finally, violence. domestic main the present will journalists. for women Handbook the of structure chapter fourth analysiscontent quantitative both using analysisfor and chapter third theory. effect media separate and equivalent as framing for argue who scholars those agenda the for researchby this fortheory fiel the within chapter data articles news

during theanalysis

the of structure The will address the address will

will address and justify the methodology used, both for sampling the articles for for articles the sampling for both used, methodology the justify and address will based on theory on based d

- setting theory as the baseline the as theory setting . Moreover, I will provide th provide will I Moreover, . will explain the logic of of logic the explain will rames identified . The f The question who sets the media agenda media the sets who question

findings

providing

n ei cvrg o dmsi voec ad ilne against violence and violence domestic of coverage media on ifth , but certainly some pattern some certainly but , thesis

chapter will deal with deal will chapter for covering articles violence. domestic eadn vrals esrn rsosbe oeae o coverage responsible measuring variables regarding

is an overview of the debates between the scholars arguing arguing scholars the debatesbetween the of overview an

s follows as the the e justification for choosing for justification e

theory and framing as mere as framing and theory

riig ognzd o te orait ad the and journalists the for organized trainings 7 will present the framing analysis of the three three the of analysis framing the present will

After this introductory chapter, second second chapter, introductory this After

the and qualitative and s will be identified identified be will s

quantitative content quantitative

and the most prominent debates prominent most the and

framing framing as a ba a as framing

extensio inductively

analysis. analysis n of it, and it, of n seline seline in the the in The The that f

CEU eTD Collection within occur that violence psychological and sexual physical, of acts “all as: defined be will dome framework,legal Serbian the with and standards international are women violence, domestic of victims the violence domestic besides forms other includes women against violence and women” against violence of form common most the is violence “domestic First, reasons. main two for term, neutral h T violence physical of form ( relationships problem of the essence the capturing women: against 2.1 Violence thesis. in this discuss briefly violence. domestic of coverage news ar analysis framing qualitative and analysis content quantitative ( agenda between equivalence forargue who those agenda for arguing scholars research. my cob 20; cefl 199 Scheufele 2004; McCombs owever, I will use the term ‘domestic violence’ in this thesis, being aware that it is a gendera is it that being aware thesis, this violence’in ‘domestic term the use I will owever, e em voec aant women’ against ‘violence term he As provide will I chapter this In

led noted already

Chapter2 As suggested in the introductory the in suggested As hereina the sp ecificity of violence against women and define and women against violence of ecificity fter dmsi voec) n eba affects Serbia in violence) domestic : voec aant oe i te aiy n i itmt partner intimate in and family the in women against violence , ,

(Muric and Ostojic 2011, Ostojic and (Muric and every second in any other form other any in second every and - - Literature review and theory building setting as a core theory and framing as an extension of it and it of extension an as framing and theory core a as setting 9; Entman 1993). 1993). Entman 9;

the justific the

oee, eoe I before However, might be best to capture the core of the problem, problem, the of core the capture to best be might 8

chapter, I will evaluate the debates between debates the evaluate will I chapter, ation for choosing framing as framing choosing for ation - h vs majority vast the setting and fram andsetting

13). Second, Second, 13). oevr I il xli wy both why explain will I Moreover, begin

(e.g. psychological violence). psychological (e.g.

e relevant for understanding for relevant e with n i tre wome three in one ing as media effect theories theories effect media as ing statistics show that show statistics . In accordance with the the with accordance In . stic violence in this thesis this in violence stic the theory building, I will will I building, theory basic concepts I concepts basic

a baseline for for baseline a

f violence of i the in n among among use -

CEU eTD Collection 2014. Mayon20, accessed 6 2014. from available 5 t anticipate to order in constructed are roles gender way the Drawi19). women” for status political and social subordinate a maintain to used control social male perspective, feminist a “From O’Neill, and Harway by argued As sphere. public the to private the from violence Ostojic 2011, same the in lived never have they sexual partners marital extra former or partners marital relations adoptive spouses former or spouses includes: persons” protected of “circle the increase to order in which law, Family Serbian member. bethedefinition of will Thisinaccordance thefamily selection inthe with members female his of violence on articles include female ar with deal will thesis the of part analysis the violence, of victims women Ostojic 2011,18; the shared has or shares perpetrator the not or whether partners or spouses current or former between or unit domestic or family the

Document in Serbian available from available Serbian in Document Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women an women against violence combating and preventing on Convention Europe of Council

relationship, or having a child a having or relationship, victims of domestic violence in the family and in intimate partner relationships. It will relationships. partner intimate in and family the violencein domestic of victims eiit coas ae mjr otiuin n relocating in contribution major a made scholars Feminist to refer equality gender improve to order in adopted Serbia documents legal the Since ng on statistics, on ng

ate ad f aet aant fema against parents of and partner :

19 http://www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/210.htm ;

Family LawFamily 2005 ofEuropeCouncil 2011 ;

persons living or living persons

- , the authors strongly argue that it is crucial to know and understand understand and know crucialto is it arguethat strongly authors the perpetrated violence against women is considered to be a for a be to considered is women against violence perpetrated chi

: ldren, pa ldren, a http://www.ombudsman.lls.rs/attach husband 6 ). aiy household family , who together, or a child on the way to be born, even though even born, be to waythe on child a or together,

rents and other blood relations; blood other and rents

5 ). ae eiec wt te victim” the with residence same abusing his abusing sdt iei tesm fml household family same the in live to used

, persons in a former or current emotional or emotional current or former a in persons e hlrn r gis ay eae family female any against or children le

wife, of male intimate partner against partner intimate male of wife, s fml memb family a as h e violence (Harway and O’Neill O’Neill and (Harway violence e ments/Porodicni%20zakon.pdf , last accessed on May 20, 20, May on accessed last , h ise of issue the

persons in persons r (e Mrc and Muric (see ers ticles reporting on on reporting ticles

d domestic violence violence domestic d (see Muric and and Muric (see - law or in in or law domestic

; (1999,

, last , extra m of of m

CEU eTD Collection domestic violence. articles covering articles and news of presence the both that argue can we violence, domestic of coverage news the ar objects these about Shaw: that assumed agenda media mass of function setting and domestic violence of newscoverage violence: domestic and 2.2 Media of domestic violenceand i be should media that of one Hence, significant. be to perceived is violence domestic (2002, with dealing 1999,

ei tde snetesmnl ril y hwadMCmsi 1972, in McCombs and Shaw by article seminal the since studies media Serbia adopted deals specifically with the ways in which women representation in the the in representation women which in ways the with specifically deals adopted Serbia

22). - 476). frame of selection the and attention for objects of selection the “Both Substantial work has been carried out on the role of role outonthe carried been Substantial work has etn pwr f as ei i the in media mass of power setting s led indicated already As r prryd (framing portrayed are

Bullock and Cubert go along go Cubert and Bullock

wife battering wife the media has media the mproved. mproved. oetc violence domestic

e powerful agenda powerful e the ,

an influence on public opinion. As later argued by McCombs and by McCombs argued later As opinion. public on influence an f The find media. ,

medi .

f h subject the of Starting from this from Starting ollowing ollowing the explanation the

’ rl i riig wrns o te oil rbe of problem social the of awareness raising in role a’s

(priming - setting roles setting

Towards a baseline theory for analyzing foranalyzing theory baseline a Towards similar lines in arguing that a number of research of number a that arguing in lines similar section

0 ) f h subject the of U.S.

r rlvn fr nlzn the analyzing for relevant are in “the setup of s of setup “the in

will shed a light on the interconnectedness the on light a shed will

ae n which in paper ” rsdnil apin of campaign presidential

(1993 the ,

) and the way these news and and news these way the and ) 62). Applying these thoughts to thoughts these Applying 62). med the six National Action Plans Action National six the ociety and the household” the and ociety ia in masscommunication ia in the authors explored authors

s for thinking thinking for s 98 i was it 1968,

The Agenda The coverage of of coverage the - CEU eTD Collection f framework media the imposing in state the of role the between Scheufele Namely, effects. media of theory a as framing for argue who scholars those are side other i about think we how and issue an about think diffe the therefore “…is other, the on framing and side, one the on agenda between difference crucial the understanding, this to According agenda of merely exten an argue is thatframing who McCombs, such scholars, one as sideare those agenda state manage important, as perceived coverage responsible more for framework media mass the by influenced is public general the that the makers decision in and but experts of public perception general the on media mass the of influence direct the in not lies media to referring context vast the goal, this achieve To of Serbia. understanding in violence domestic of coverage news articl and news that way the majority (2006, ” - , In my my In importance the on debates serious are there Second, on be will research this in interest main the chapter, introductory the in indicated As setting and framing as two separate theories. Regarding this second reason, on the the on reason, second this Regarding theories. separate two as framing and setting

focus frames as independenta frames - distinguishes between setting, or the “second the or setting,

previous studies in the in studies previous d

ing

of thesis to impose it to impose 0) Ti i srl oe f the of one surely is This 100).

research based on the agenda the on based research

on media effects on public opinion. As Walgrave and Aelst Aelst and Walgrave As opinion. public on effects media on agenda setting theory is not enough. There are two main reasons. First, reasons. main two are There enough. not is theory setting agenda

I will deal with media frame as a dependent variable and I will analyze will I and variable dependent a as frame media with deal will I one of the main questions of interest in my research is whether is research my in interest of questions main the of one s

will. will. es are framed in order to assess the effect of state policies on policies state of effect the assess to order in framed are es

nd dependent (see variable 1999, studies dealing wit studies dealing -

level agenda level field of field

of domestic violence domestic of mass communi mass 11 - t (Scheufele and Tewksbury 2007, Tewksbury and (Scheufele t - setting” (see Scheufele and Tewksbury 2007). 2007). Tewksbury and Scheufele (see setting”

setting theory was conducted in the Western the in conducted was theory setting

reason h media i frames and s or coverage of coverage or

o sae neet i interest state for cation . If the media framework is framework media the If .

, “… , of 106 rence between whether we we whether between rence

ifrnito between differentiation - the power of the mass the of power the 108). 108). - domestic violence domestic ndividual frames and setting and priming, priming, and setting

ipsn the imposing n correctly argue correctly

14). On the On 14). traditional sion

the

in a CEU eTD Collection coverage. of framework agenda the of d the examining research no context were there research, Western predominantly explaining in above mentioned to beunidirectional, from coming mass assume is effect the that is point core The changes. policy certain achieve to makers policy al et (Baumgartner arrang political prevailing the from resistance meets problems of understanding new and proposals, policy the Bau conducting. am I research agenda to comparison in concept this of agenda than in Serbia of change the on influence state the of wh question the to answer an providing in help will variable dependent a as 1999, Scheufele (see (Scheufele 1999, journ groups, interest of pressures constraints, and pressures organizational values, and norms “…social are factors those that argues he Namely, issues. different framing are journalists way the explaining issues? certain “…w ask: we should variable dependent a as frames media analyzing when that suggests Sheufele Serbia.

main focus of all agenda all of focus main hs id f rmwr i qetoal fr h post the for questionable is framework of kind This a as framing of choice the justify to order In .

- setti ” (1999, ” ements but sometimes breaks through to create dramatic policy changes” changes” policy dramatic create to through breaks sometimes but ements

ng in its traditional meaning, I meaning, traditional its in ng 109). I will concentrate on the state’s role in the process of “fram of I concentratewill state’s inthe process role onthe 109). a fcos nlec te a junlss r te scea gop frame groups societal other or journalists way the influence factors hat

2006

alistic routines, and ideological or political orientations political or ideological and routines, alistic 115). Accordingly, choosing the media frame approach with the the with approach frame media the choosing Accordingly, 115).

108). Further, drawing Further,108). ). The idea behind these thoughts is in the influence of of influence the in is thoughts these behind idea The ).

hs s o is This - setting studies is “…on the dynamics by which new ideas, new new ideas, new which by dynamics the “…on is studies setting mgartner and others make others and mgartner f

ore o t sy that say to not course

- the media framework for covering for framework media the media. - setting and its major advantage for the type of the of type the for advantage major its and setting 12

on previous research, he offers possible factors possible offers he research, previous on

have to point out important defining features features defining important out point to have irection of the effect in forming the media media the forming in effect the of irection baseline theory for my research rather research my for theory baseline an important an

agenda - omns cnet n as and context communist - etn ter was theory setting

point in arguing that arguing in point domestic violence domestic at was the effect effect the was at of journalists” of the the e building” e building” media on on media - setting setting frame

not d

CEU eTD Collection attenti call agenda than with the in explored aspect without based, incident were stories that and stereotypical was coverage of framework the that was problem the Rather, coverage. framing thespecific ison waypresented different are issues (2007). approach centered victim th in present victims for services crimes, of perpetrator, statistics (e.g., for consequences angles issuelegal ofthe the covering of different of case the In well. as way specific a in issue the presents (1993, recomm treatment and/or evaluation, moral causal interpretation, definition, problem particular a promote to as a way in a salient such more in them text, communicating make and reality perceived a of aspects some select to is frame of mode the to refers presen also framing suggest, authors as Namely, role. constructivist its violence domestic Tewks and (Scheufele audiences. by understood is it how on influence an have can reports news in characterized is (2007, framing d important some offered Tewksbury and ScheufeleNamely, contexts. different to adaptedway some in and developed challenged,

tation which is in accordanceexistin tation whichisin withthe f h ise Hw th How issue. the of 52). Hence, framing includes not only selection of certain angles of th of angles certain of selection only not includes framing Hence, 52). “ that: argues who Entman, Robert from come framing of features defining Crucial In the example of example Inthe n o oe set o raiy hl osuig te eeet, hc mgt lead might which elements, other obscuring while reality of aspects some to on

9). They argue that framing “…is based on the assumption that how an issue an how that assumption the on based “…is framing that argue They 9). thesis -

setting in its traditional sense is because, as argued by Entman: “Frames Entman: by argued as because, is sense traditional its in setting as it is portrayed in media. Moreover, framing has its relevance in light of of light in relevance its has framing Moreover, media. in portrayed is it as oase hs usinfaigi mr aporaeter o start to theory appropriate more is framing question this answer To . uy 2007, bury ) domestic violence domestic .

Accordingly, Scheufele and Tewksbury emphasize that focus of focus that emphasize Tewksbury and Scheufele Accordingly, is framework changed and how the state influenced it will be be will it influenced state the how and changed framework is

11). This point is very important for the perception of of perception the for important very is point This 11). mnin fr oprn agenda comparing for imensions a rae faeok o provide to framework broader

in Serbia, the problem was not that there was no no was there that not was problem the Serbia, in 13 atce ad edr estv covering sensitive gender and article) e

g “frames” among audience (2007, domestic violence domestic nain o te tm described item the for endation

- set the the ig piig and priming ting, , framing is both is framing , social problem problem social e issue but it but issue e

12). 12).

(e.g. (e.g. To

” ”

CEU eTD Collection rea main between changed violence domestic of coverage stereotyped have much how question the to answer victims) for services on information with articles more (e.g. improved violence domestic covering articles the in present information of quality (1999, powe a media, mass the through reinforced and transmitted also are is violence domestic of issue violence in state the of role violence positive a was there whether see to help of society larger the absolves and women against violence of roots social the denies media news the pathology, problem. social serious a and issue on stories based incident have exam For 1993). (see omit they what by and include they what by defined are they responsible coverage of frame media the of importance to audiences

32). Hence, quantitative content an content quantitative Hence, 32). For issues such as domestic violence, framing has crucial importance. There are two are There importance. crucial has framing violence, domestic as such issues For will analysis framing The Namely, time. same the at elements two by defined are frames Entman, Following . Hence, I will analyze media frame as a dependent variable and I will examine the examine will I and variable dependent a as frame media analyze will I Hence, . the in Serbia. os Frt daig n rmin da o hgmn ad oiat ideology, dominant and hegemony on ideas Gramsian on drawing First, sons. about two time periods analyzed. periods two time have different reactions” (1993, reactions” different have the possible perception of perception possible the

any obligation to end it” (2003, it” end to obligation any developing domestic violence leadnorms. thatmight tochange insocial s rud y al, “Maintain Carli, by argued As in Serbia in domestic violence domestic ,

which leads the state to influence its shape to achi to shape its influence to state the leads which the media framework for the news coverage of of coverage news the for framework media the also . As argued by Marin and Russo, “Patriarchal attitudes “Patriarchal Russo, and Marin by argued As . help to see how embedded in patriarchal structure the the structure patriarchal in embedded how see to help

domestic violence domestic alysis (priming) will help us help will (priming) alysis change in the quality of coverage of of coverage of quality the in change

14 55). The main point here point main The 55).

that give that ,

whe

1603). The analysis of media frames will will frames media of analysis The 1603). reas framing analysis will provide an provide will analysis framing reas

us a picture about about picture a us

as a private problem rather problem private a as ing this mirage of individual individual of mirage this ing rful social rful

is about the perceived the about is

examine whether the the whether examine the status the ization agent” ization eve ple, if we we if ple,

domestic domestic

a more a

of the of

than than

CEU eTD Collection of the methodologicalof the thesis. part indicators specific of analysis content covera responsible quantitative the through periods time two the in violence domestic of coverage the in difference the examine will I Hence, 550). (2005, an topic, particular a to devoted agenda most research, “ that: argues who impo The periods. time two the of analysis two analyzed periods. time the between show these difference the on and frames media the on be will thesis this in focus sources, for used are persons which omitted, or included are facts which identifying by stories in meanings underlying Me example for (see society of structure patriarchal the and roles gender predefined on based frames the preserving in media the of role quo” “status the emphasized scholars feminist es 97. eod a age b Byerly: by argued as Second, 1997). yers content quantitative a through well, as media of role priming the with deal will I ge of domestic violence, which I will describe in greater detail further in in further detail greater in describe will I which violence, domestic of ge olwn te eea la o cnet nlss n as communication mass in analysis content of lead general the Following - setting studies have emphasized attention, the number of news stories news of number the attention, emphasized have studies setting

and how information is arranged is information how and d secondarily, the prominence of the news about an issue an about news the of prominence the secondarily, d

rtance of priming is emphasized by McCombs, McCombs, by emphasized is priming of rtance 15

Faig nlss los n t lct the locate to one allows analysis “Framing ”

(1999, 391). Hence, 391). (1999, the main the …” CEU eTD Collection violence. victim coverage. media its in problem taught the were Journalists and issue the of specificity violence, domestic of at the MinistryLaborand Social Policy of ofSerbia: Ranitovic, Petrovic Tamara by argued As personnel. news for organized were trainings seven years, cover to aim an violence women and for violenceagainst 201 period the in personnel newspapers for trainings organizing (a) by strategy, this coverage violence domestic of quality the improving jo to presented violence domestic on handbooks show, be could reporters teaching Miller, violence” domestic and assault sexual abo informed better became reporters as improve to tended news trends. several revealswomen against violence coverageof news early the of “Analysis to is violence domestic 1 Chapter3

and s

Experts on domestic violence were violence domestic on Experts tendency to not analytically, write their to from focus their shift to wanted We happens. but violence when only write violence, of victims women the chase to the increase to was focus Our First media improve to order in use can states strategies possible the of One and hence and

oevr t Moreover, y b wiig n pbihn the publishing and writing (b) by former ,

trainings on gender sensitive reporting were organized throughout Ser throughout organized were reporting sensitive gender on trainings

as many as

to write about to write

- coordinator of the project “Combating sexual and gender based violence” based gender and sexual “Combating project the of coordinator the ways the

T eaching e wr dsorgd o find to discouraged were hey about

cities and municipalities and cities ri junlss o t cover to how journalists train and some practical rules on how to interview victim interview to how on rules practical some and

the ph the the

journalists on domestic violence coverage incident itself. a enomena of domestic violence, domestic of enomena

useful practical strategy, and as some previous research previous some as and strategy, practical useful number of stories on on stories of number

19, 392). (1999, journalists hired to give to hired 16

adok n ei cvrg o domestic of coverage media on Handbook

(Interview 1, as possible as

(Aleksic 2011). and Djorgovic

stereo (2009, oevr a Moreover,

lectures to journalists on the nature the on journalists to lectures uh cases such rait hd oiie fet in effects positive had urnalists domestic ye jsiiain for justifications typed .

199). Serbian authorities used used authorities Serbian 199).

In the period of one and a half half a and one of period the In p. 1)

s argued by Meloy and and Meloy by argued s t h fcs surrounding facts the ut .

violence…

the delicate position of of position delicate the s rud y Byerly, by argued As s

from

not

portrayal of portrayal of domesticof

bia with bia

2009 to 2009 act

…

of s the the

CEU eTD Collection journalist 1, Interview (see participate to refused i succeed not did they but participate, to editors motivate published. be will p atte these in succeeding in problem main the However, towards shift the influence to and cases violence domestic argues:Ranitovic for justifications avoid to violence, of consists Handbook This cases. violence domestic about write to how on guidelines precise offered authors the and violence domestic covering in practice bad and good of examples practical vio and violence domestic of coverage vio no is there violence domestic articipate in the trainings. trainings. the in articipate lence in iswidelydispersed The aim of t of aim The disc one time same the at and commi someone that report perpetrator to rather the in neither reason the for look never to journalists to say pattern…we a is there say can we that often so is them happen it drunk, was he that happens often it perpetrator, of profile no is there Since media on Handbook mentioned above the with familiarized were journalists Second, condemn the viole pover violenceDomestic s.

ourage themtofindany reasons. given

o lm i te eptao lk i al te cie. e completely We crimes. other all in like perpetrator the is blame to recommendations y a’ b ue t jsiy h voec. ht hy hud o s to is do should they What violence. the justify to used be can’t ty s that person is alcoholic and different things happen, but none of of none but happen, things different and alcoholic is person that s profile of the perpetrator the of profile

As the main coordinator, main the As eg jaos, alcohol jealousy, (e.g. he trainings and trainings he nce and the violent perpetrator. (Interview theviolentperpetrator. and nce p. 2) 1,

is not specific for any social group, and alcohol, jealousy,alcohol, and group, social anynot specificfor is This is especially important since it is the editors that decide what decide that editors the is it since especiallyimportant is This a

criminal act of domestic violence for which the only the which for violence domestic of act criminal Serbian society. o rt mr sca fcs tre, o nld saitc on statistics include to stories, focus social more write to of the the Handbook was to change the way journalists cover journalists way changethe to was Handbook the ec aant women against lence

ab rm and crime but anybody could be an abuser and abuser an be could anybody but

tted a crime of murder which is murder murder is which murder of crime a tted (Interview 1, . ) Rte, riig wr ognzd with organized were trainings Rather, 2). p. Petrovic Ranitovic argues that their goal was to was goal their that argues Ranitovic Petrovic use, poverty) and they were rather taught that that taught rather were they and poverty) use, 17

Namely, as Ranitovic: Namely, argued by Petrovic

o t ue stereotypes use to not mpts

p. 2) n thi n

was n a Ti Hnbo cnitd of consisted Handbook This .

or in the victim, but but victim, the in or s attempt as the editors often editors the as attempt s oil ou o te problem. the of focus social the refusal of the editors to editors the of refusal

. As Petrovic Petrovic As .

this form of of form this

CEU eTD Collection results ofthe analysis. metho I articles. analyzed the violencecoveragein domestic qualityof the measuring coverage for responsible developingof indicatorsin were used Handbook the guidelinesfrom violence domestic of coverage the much how dological part of the thesis, I thesis, the of part dological help will analysis framing qualitative and analysis content Quantitative

will describe in detail these indicators these detail in describe will 18

n h to time two the in s

period

before I before has n the following the n

changed. in

present the present evaluat The The ing

CEU eTD Collection analysis content quantitative reporting patterns and analyzing identifying, for method a is analysis “Thematic Clarke, and Braun by argued newspaper within periods, time two in framework media articl of number periods time two the between the in differences discover to aimed is analysis content domest Quantitative of coverage media of type the and extent the both capture Figure 1 the mediathe coverage frameworkfor of periods time two the of po domesti of quality the in difference a is there whether examine to and question research ssible directions ssible Media framework before I develop I qualitative and analysis content quantitative both conduct will I chapter this In c violence c .

The direction of direction theeffectThe in 2009 State ed

(themes) within data” (2006(themes) before and after the new state policies were adopted were policies state new the after and before

among factors responsible forresponsible among factors a se a I

t of of t will help in understanding the role of the state policies in providing in policies state the of role the understanding in help will will explain the methods which will be used in order to answer the the answer to order in used be will which methods the explain will indicators .

. Qualitative . The r The Chapter4 ationale for for ationale State policies of the

domestic violence domestic responsible Media framing media frameworkmedia building

–

19 Methodology , 79). 2009

choosing the the choosing

actors building the media framework. The analysisTheframework. media the building

/training

analysis is aimed to show the show to aimed is analysis

news

s and in respect to one another one to respect in and s

coverage .

indicators

of domestic violence for for violence domestic of

c ilne n Serbia in violence ic Media framework after

. was twofold: f twofold: was

Figure 1 depicts the depicts 1 Figure framing 2009 nature coverage of of coverage

analysis

irst,

of the of . As .

es es to to to .

CEU eTD Collection an offering a presents article butrathearticle, core asthe theformer therestories isthatparticular incident a in isno of and (g) expert sources violence domestic of legislation and victims for services shelters, statistics, on information stories focus v domestic of institutions, state the from response clear for necessity the and violence domestic of component social relevant the of work the question Finally, consequences. abuser the (b) as labeled the perpetrator the for sentence the namely abuser, criminal about write to was recommendations the of one Moreover, alcohol jealousy, (e.g. articles the in justification crime the of presence as such alcohol violence, poverty, jealousy, for rationalizations contain not should articles that emphasized was It in changed be should what and violence domestic covering media dealingfactors subject previouswith this from studies a by propagated practices capture nd violence against women against violence nd

tt hs fr sad of stand firm a has state ehdlgcly te ifrne ewe sca fcs stories focus social between difference the Methodologically, import most The T he

analytical approach to t to approach analytical Handbook suggests the main examples of good and bad practices in the Serbian Serbian the in practices bad and good of examples main the suggests Handbook and this indicator islab

iolence (see Maxwell et al 2000; al et Maxwell (see iolence ti ws lo suggeste also was (this social social

present in thearticles.present in ant indicators borrowed from borrowed indicators ant problem approach to approach problem ab use. Hence, one of the indicators tested in this research is (a) the (a) is research this in tested indicators the of one Hence, use.

(Aleksic and Djorgovic 2011) Djorgovic and (Aleksic

odmain f oetc violence domestic of condemnation

the the e he issue in issue he tt atoiis eg plc) n re t epaie the emphasize to order in police) (e.g. authorities state led as (c) the stateas authority the (c) led Handbook for the media coverage of domestic violence domestic of coverage media the for Handbook i te Handbook) the in d

20 domestic violence issue (e.g. e (e.g. issue violence domestic dicating broader social frame). social broader dicating

Bullock and Cubert 2002), include: (d) social social (d) include: 2002), Cubert and Bullock

, which would suggest to suggest would which , e an yet

. previous studies on the media coverage media the on studies previous

other () niet ae sois (f) stories, based incident (e) , and second, to include relevant relevant include to second, and

motn sgeto ws to was suggestion important ’ s response. s response. how

and this indicator was was indicator this and

osqecs o the for consequences

this issue this and incident based based incident and the

ditorials, articles articles ditorials, ab

Information on Information readership that readership s, poverty). use,

is covered is r the .

CEU eTD Collection sources several issue, violence domestic to approach focus social more society segment of case the not is this that show clearly violence on domestic studies although identifiable, easily as presented usually are perpetrators that showed (se violence domestic of portrayal media on studies previous presented are violence (b) 1997), Meyers a men between power of relations unequal on based roles gender stereotyped the to the refers it in and recognized well as is literature feminist it because relevant is framework This abuse). alcohol and poverty for rationalizations stereotyped through cases violence articles: the in identified as consisting ofapproximatelyarticles 300 such samples, smaller with option better a is test exact deviation because made is choice in violence domestic stories (neighbors) are with theexpert’s complemented opinion. these in sources traditional that and angles different from approached is violence are sources Expert violence. domestic of victims the for solutions systemic of existence the and problem the of awareness raise to believed are legislation and victims for services statistics,

considered an considered o the For in Changes

from the null hypothesis null the from

ulttv faig analy framing qualitative —

important indicator as indicator important

andBuzawaBuzawa 2003) and (see dniiainl frame identificational nldn epr sources expert including h am the newspapers

in hs test this

(a) oetc ilne articles violence domestic ount of specific indicators of responsible news coverage of of coverage news responsible of indicators specific of ount

justif ’

articles were tested with a Fisher’s exact one exact Fisher’s a with tested were articles . Moreover, in comparison to comparison in Moreover, . provides an exact calculation of the significance of the the of significance the of calculation exact an provides icational

(N=330 well since they indicate that indicate they since well ,

i I sis which refers to the way perpetrators of domestic domestic of perpetrators way the to refers which

frame — “

). ). tts u” oe f h mda n preserving in media the of role quo” status observe

o ifrain peec o saitc on statistics of presence information, for wih ees o otaa o domestic of portrayal to refers which , Ti fae a eaie i some in examined was frame This .

(c)

the

domestic domestic

societal frame societal including an analytic approach, approach, analytic an including n aue cn oe rm any from come can abuser and e Bul e he ms poiet frames prominent most three h oe sd n hs thesis this in used one the the lock and Cubert 2002) that 2002) Cubert and lock

the problem of domestic domestic of problem the violence chi - square test, Fisher’s test, square ,

which

nd women (see women nd eg jealousy (e.g. - tail test. tail

refers to the refers to This , ,

CEU eTD Collection written” (Interview 3, h Stojanovic Natasa journalist its by argued as and stories. analytical of much without articles short 1). are there hence article, Moreover argued journalistDjordjevic, by Katarina paper, serious enables newspaper every ustoexamine segmentscene. of theSerbian one covering are they way the in issues. different and readership the of terms in orientation different have thr selected 4 of the oncriminal perpetrator, tothevictim. oroptionsavailable consequence or information state of role the of violence,discussion ence .1 Sample

Blic

chose only serious, issue oriented newspapers, or only yellow press. press. yellow only or newspapers, oriented issue serious, only chose

“…

rae prpcie. elw rs i uuly ed y hs wt mostly with those by read elementary education school usually is press Yellow perspectives. broader are we audience which reach. and to writing, trying are we whom to know all we think I are: newspapers analyzed The consists sample The is privately owned semi privately is owned , the key is that everyone understand everyone that is key the ee newspapers ee Djordjevic

the oldest daily newspaper in the country with country the in newspaper daily oldest the

This kind of newspapers selection selection newspapers of kind This

p. 1). p.

lis that claims more options to approach to options more oiiai ra yhgl euae epewt somewhat with people educated highly by read is Politika ,

one serious, one semi one serious, one

f 330 of - tabloid leaningtowards tabloid

Politika Politika .

(Interview 2, rils rm he ntoa diy newspapers. daily national three from articles

Politika authorities in dealing with the problem, condemnationproblem, the dealingwith in authorities

of Society in section a a o o sae n em o leng of terms in space of lot a has 22 , s the message, the point is how something how is point the message, the s

Blic -

every topic analytically topic every tabloid and one tabloid paper, paper, tabloid one and tabloid

they try to reach to try they Kurir p helps . 1)

and

a is a typical yellow press newspaper press yellow typical a is to avoid to

Kurir tabloid approach with a with approach tabloid Politika a . Politika 110 years long tradition. As tradition. long years 110 a bias which might which bias a a broad reading audience reading broad

More importantly, it it importantly, More

is (see Interview 2, p. 2, Interview (see

issue oriented issue because they because

h fo th majorityof

occur if occur I have have I each r

CEU eTD Collection 7 S cove media responsible for campaign intensive of effect Another organized. were trainings which in year the being overall, 31 in 20 violence strategy state section incidentas based couldwell. contain articles short, i whereas of case the in straightforward is distinction This policy). social problems, youth violence, domestic (e.g. problems social different on articles murder (e.g. tragedies different together periods inbothtime andhadof330. onlyarticles inallnewspapers out 5 sections Chronicle and Society the of search complete of choice the that shown has search The beaten. rape, murder, jealousy, quarrel, family, violence, terms: search following the through conducted was sections other of search regarding articles of majority vast a contain sections these since conducted, was sections Society and Chronicle the of search complete period, each in months three the For today. until 2003 from newspapers Serbian all of articles complete

Availa trategy. Also, in both time frames I avoided the period of the “16 days of activism” of days “16 the of period the avoided I frames time both in Also, trategy. the ble from ble For the period after the adoption, I decided to avoid 2009, since it might cause bi cause might it since 2009, avoid to decided I adoption, the after period the For 2006 in months three first the selected I on articles usuallycontains sectionChronicle the sections, the natureof Regardingthe T , 8 in 8 , e rils ee band rm the from obtained were articles he te ae of cases the n

Chronicle section and 17 in in 17 and section Chronicle in I this In . : the the the http://www.arhiv.rs/ Chronicle section and 34in Chronicle section and 36 in 36 and section Chronicle

ie period time Blic

and , last accessed on April 26, 2014. 26, April on accessed last , s, crimes), whereas the Society section usually contains contains usually section Society the whereas crimes), s, Kurir Politika

the h dfeec i otn lre, ic ter Society their since blurred, often is difference the

oit scin Finally, section. Society

the had had 23 the the only, was justified, since all the other sections other the all since justified, was only,

for the period before the adoption of the new the of adoption the before period the for Ebart Society section. Society section. Societysection. overall 44 articles dealing with domestic domestic with dealing articles 44 overall Politika

lcrnc database electronic

, which has firm issue orientation, orientation, issue firm has which ,

reason is the possible snow possible the is reason rage after the adoption of the the of adoption the after rage oetc violence domestic

Blic

had 37 articles overall, overall, articles 37 had Kurir 7

hc contains which had 63 articles articles 63 had

su. The issue.

against - ball ball as, as,

CEU eTD Collection Serbia. journalist from of Association Journalists’ the of service press the in works of journalist Further, Serbia. of Policy Social and Gender B conducted media in differences qualitative information additional the additio provide they Namely, purpose. explanatory representative semi conducted the Finally, sections. other in 5 and 39 Handbook the since time reasonable adop women coverage media violence domestic

in Society section. journalists’ understanding of understanding journalists’ tion of the new state strategy I strategy state new the of tion the

Beside ahr hn n niao o rsosbe coverage responsible of indicator an than rather a Society section. section. Society

. In this time period, time this In . sed Violence P Violence sed with Tamara Petrovic Ranitovic, forme Ranitovic, Petrovic Tamara with framing Politika

engaged in the process of policies implementation. These interviews have an an have interviews These implementation. policies of process the in engaged Blic the , -

tutrd neves ih h tand orait ad th and journalists trained the with interviews structured hc i a result a is which

(

November 25 November responded tomy for calls an interview. uniaie otn aayi and analysis content quantitative ,

nlss Fnly te interviews the Finally, analysis. coverage before and after the S the after and before coverage with Nata with

on roject, Gender Equality Directorate atthe

Blic

09 to 2009 h dt otie truh uniaie otn aayi and analysis content quantitative through obtained data the

had 60 articles overall, 21 in 21 overall, articles 60 had Politika sa Stojanovic, Stojanovic, sa Kurir the problem problem the -

2011 December selected first three mont three first selected f goa ana cmag aant ilne against violence against campaign annual global a of

had 78 articles overall, 34 in 34 overall, articles 78 had had 48 articles overall, 9 overall, articles 48 had interview was conducted conducted was interview

a eis f training of series 24 Kurir of of 10) 10)

domestic r coordinator of the Combating Sexual and Sexual Combating the of coordinator r nal information regarding information nal characterized by characterized

journalist and with Katarina Ko Katarina with and journalist trategy adoption. The interview The adoption. trategy

the ep n etr understanding better in help

violence ec, o te eid fe the after period the for Hence, the hs in 2 in hs qual s

for journalists journalists for

Chronicle, 34 in 34 Chronicle, in itative

ih aaia Djordjevic, Katarina with within within the . Furthermore, they offer offer they Furthermore, . 013 which also provided also which 013

the and campaign intensive Chronicle section and and section Chronicle Chronicle and 44 in 44 and Chronicle framing Ministry of LabourMinistry of Unfortunately, no no Unfortunately, rlvn state relevant e

the and

the state’s and state’s nlss I analysis the vac, who who vac, Society s were were s

2011

the

CEU eTD Collection Althoughdomestic vi of thenumber period Blic stories based incident the approaches v latter the in 7% articles those of 5.2% to articles related violence domestic of and second the 5 jealo violence (e) sources, domestic of legislation and victims for services shelters, statistics, (a) indicators: following the for looking analysis of iolence related stories related iolence .1 Chapter5 Politika . For example, in 2006, 2006, in example, For . Kurir Results usy,alcohol

In chapte this covered . As shown in shown As

As . ,

The

time time

different social problems from problems social different not only in how many articles they publish on domestic violence but violence domestic on publish they articles many how in only not Kurir rsneo teciejsiiaini h rilsi tetotm eid (e.g. periods time two the in articles the in justification crime the of presence explained

– , whereas whereas , . similar similar

period in all analyzed news analyzed all in period One of the potential explanations potential the of One

The state of newspapers coverage domesticof violence ab

and Where werewe andwhere are use, poverty),use, (f)

r I present anddiscuss will the r Table 1, the number of articles covering domestic violence increased in increased violence domestic covering articles of number the 1, Table Blic

increase is n rae dti i te methodological the in detail greater in the fact that this daily is daily this that fact the for this newspaper this for Blic

articles social focus stories, (b) incident based stories, (c) information (c) stories, based incident (b) stories, focus social Politika

a 2 and 20 had in percentages in in order to evaluate and compare and evaluate to order in olence storiesincreased inall related period inthe second

abuser consequencesabuser

had only 8 incident based stories in the three months months three the in stories based incident 8 only had an papers, although significantly in the cases of of cases the in significantly although papers, Kurir 25 was much lower in comparison with comparison in lower much was analytical point of view. Hence, the number of of number the Hence, view. of point analytical

can be observed be can

for mainly

had results ofthe quantitativeanalysis content results

Politika

0 niet ae stories based incident 30

and an we know?

issue orient issue in the former, and from 4.5% to 4.5% from and former, the in ’s

in insignificant rise of domestic of rise insignificant ) hpe o te thesis the of chapter

state authorities response. authorities state Blic the

and ed newspaper which which newspaper ed two time periods time two

Kurir , ,

changes i changes from 2.8% from (d) expert expert (d) published Kurir Kurir , I was was I , Blic and

- on of

n .

CEU eTD Collection information thearticles in journ the for easier the with that suggest mig results These stories. based incident the in all at mentioned not was violence domestic violence periods newspaper, above the with line in well of use the term mentioned the of in period second the in more used Namely,act. criminal a violenceasindicating domestic terms <**p < .05,one .01,one tailed. tailed;*p alreadymind disturbing related todomestic mentioned statistics violence inSerbia. level satisfying the bellow still is coverage of amount this analyzed, newspapers Domestic time articles violenceperiods inthetwo comparedoverall related number tothe Politika

h q The surveyed Kurir ’ Blic

a 1% Ti ices i epcal iprat ic i te is pro in period first the in since important especially is increase This 15%. was the with

atttv cnet nlss hw ta tee r dfeecs n h aon of amount the in differences are there that shows analysis content uantitative domestic violence term in bot in term violence domestic

a more analytical approach. The highest difference between the two time time two the between difference highest The approach. analytical more a was alists to recognize to alists

newly adopted and adopted newly observed

(see Table 2) Table (see .

stories stories 1/06 niae epcain that expectation indicated 44/1273 63/1396 37/1305 in - Blic Blic 3/06 .

for Blic, Kurir and Kurir for Blic, Politika the acts of domestic violence, and hence to mention this this mention to hence and violence, domestic of acts the However, , in which the increase of increase the which in ,

and TABLE 1 TABLE

clear h time periods in comparison with with comparison in periods time h Kurir 26 er

Politika

, legal framework legal whereas

1/13 48/1183 78/1099 60/1139

had

Politika -

3/13 Politika Politika a the

significantly higher amount of amount higher significantly

the term domestic violence was violencewas domestic term

of s h mr serious more the is

use of the term the of use had a decrease in the use use the in decrease a had

domestic violence, it is it violence, domestic Fisher’sexact (one sided) 0.248 0.004 0.001 Blic ,

** **

and bearing in in bearing

‘ domestic

Kurir

daily Blic

of ht , , CEU eTD Collection for violenceratherthan problem. showingthesocial contained often articles the that sense a in reporting the of quality the shown co quality low for particular the on f was social the period on than rather first incidents, the in articles the of focus predominant that suggest for 92% make stories based social number of examine. I that changes the before even violence domestic providing in interest triggered that daily the of seriousness the to Kurir social of violence The amountofarticles , but not for not but , 1/13 1/06 focus second storiesone inthe

further, the incident based focus of the articles in the first period, negatively affected affected negatively period, first the in articles the of focus based incident the further, in period first the at look a take we If a see We

in all newspapers all in focus - -

social 3/13 3/06

rils regarding articles focus stories was in was stories focus verage of domestic violence before the changes that that changes the before violence domestic of verage Politika hf toward shift , although here we observe similar levels of coverage possibly due due possibly coverage of levels similar observe we here although , . The main hypothesis, main The . mentioning the term ‘domesticviolence’ periods time intwo Blic s

20% Blic a 5%

oetc violence domestic and 97% for for 97% and oe social more

ocus of domestic violence issue violence domestic of ocus

(Table 3) (Table Blic , T from ABLE 27 .

only 8% percent in the first period, thefirst percentonly 8% in rbe apoc t te su o domestic of issue the to approach problem Blic Kurir that t that

and fe 2009 after

here will be will here se al 3 and 3 Table (see Kurir 15% 9% Kurir

w cn oie ht incident that notice can we , h hget i highest The a spotd for supported was

an responsible responsible ,

individual individual i fitting my expectation my fitting ncrease in the number number the in ncrease I

examine.

4) .

These findings findings These ncrease in the the in ncrease Politika 31% 34% explanations coverage of of coverage

As will be will As to

Blic

28% of of 28%

and CEU eTD Collection

second the in stories these of 65% were there period, time first Politika mark trade stories audience reading stable has which than higher times than higher times 15 than more stories, focus social the of 50% had stories <**p < .10,one .05,one tailed. tailed;*p State Abuser consequences Crime justification sourcesExpert shelters, legislationStatistics, Incident based stories Social focus stories Variable Percentage of authorities response . Hence, the incident based stories with sensationalist approach have never been the been never have approach sensationalist with stories based incident the Hence, . on domestic violence domestic on In contrast to contrast In ,

although insignificant although

Politika the

Blic

indicators of responsible of indicators

Blic Tee idns ol b epand y the by explained be could findings These . .

eetees tee a a ices i te oil ou sois in stories focus social the in increase an was there Nevertheless,

and

(see Table 5). Table (see . Namely, afte Namely, . Kurir Blic ,

in the two time in the two ht s dctd n can and educated is that 1/06 Politika N=37 24 35 92 5 2 2 8% TABLE 3 TABLE

% % % - % % % 3/06 Namely,

news 28 r 50% percent of the social focus stories in the in stories focus social the of percent 50% r

shows di shows

coverage of

period already in the first time period time first the in already fferent trends regarding social regarding trends fferent 1/13 s

N=60 15 18 12 20 72 28% 8 % - domestic violencedomestic in present % % % % % 3/13

one nesad oe analytical more understand

. These findings suggest findings These . seriousness Kurir Fisher’sexact test , and more than 6 than more and , (one sided)

0.131 0.032** 0.054* 0.117 0.012** 0.014** 0.014** of Politika Politika

focus

, CEU eTD Collection Surla, and houses, safe namely victims, in framework, for services the with dealt period second N.B.J., (see violence domestic on statistics information this shelters for victims andlegislation, violence, domestic on statistics on information contained articles the of percent 2% only legislation a trends important several observe can we violence, bottom. w violence, domestic addressing upgraded only was which approach oriented Accordingly, newspapers. the all in issue violence domestic to comparison 27. preserving period, Djordjevic (see perpetrators for only Namely, that of domestic violence in as such newspaper oriented issue an even that

infcn ices i te variable the in increase significant

03. hs fnig sget ht h qaiy f oeae s ihr in higher is coverage of quality the that suggest findings These 2013). Politika Politika Blic If we take a closer look at the at look closer a take we If in focus social the with articles the to look closer A

Politika

within the article the within Mrh 6 21) Tee idns ugs ta te prah f h articles the of approach the that suggest findings These 2013). 16. March , the went Politika

addition to the information on statistics on domestic violence (see for example for (see violence domestic on statistics on information the to addition subordinated position subordinated Blic

el wt te rbe of problem the with dealt in

Blic well and

had an article dealing with the with dealing article an had

social focussocial stories. .

Kurir These beyond

in the cases of cases the in , 2% percent of articles from the first period covered merely merely covered period first the from articles of percent 2% since Politika Kurir hereas a fifth of the articles in the second period (20%) inthearticles second containedfifth ofthe period

of women in society (see Djordjevic (see society in women of specific h ntr o te esae sae te prah to approach the shaped newspaper the of nature the

, February , and esrn te rsne of presence the measuring Blic Blic

edr troye ad oil om wih are which norms social and stereotypes gender Blic 29 Blic

indicators of responsible coverage of domestic of coverage responsible of indicators and and , Feb. 13. 2006), whereas the articles from the from articles the whereas 2006), 13. Feb. , Politika

fe te adoption the after

and (see Table (see n eln wt dmsi voec issue. violence domestic with dealing in

26. Kurir Kurir Kurir punishment

2013). Moreover, 2013). dedicated more space to space more dedicated a patcly o tr fo the from start to practically had . Unlike the first period in which in period first the Unlike . the second time period indicates period time second the 3 , 4 and 4 , Politika

for abuser, such as therapy as such abuser, for

f h sae oiis in policies state the of

ttsis setr and shelters statistics, 5 ). First, we can notice can we First, ).

in the second the in already had issue issue had already ,

Politika the problem the Politika the , March , legal time

CEU eTD Collection violence domestic of spread the emphasizing in engaged more much are articles period second the that suggest findings the Nevertheless, Kurir Blic legislation and shelters <**p < .10,one .05,one tailed. tailed;*p State authorities response Abuser consequences Crime justification sourcesExpert shelters, Statistics, Incident based stories Social focus stories Variable hadmedia an violence framework influence onthe period. ondomestic time inthe second suggest might this Vuckovic, (see 2009 after period the in houses safe the of openings well. as framework legal the and victims for services problem the of seriousness the violence domestic regarding

Percentage of , wt ams n m no almost with , we can observe that that observe can we We can notice that there is a significant a is there that notice can We

the

that the state’s commitment to deal with the problem of domestic violence domestic of problem the with deal to commitment state’s the that legislation

indicators of responsible of indicators

i n the case of case the n

ention ttsis n ilne oiae n h scn pro a wl in well as period second the in dominate violence on statistics

Blic Kurir o only not ing

1/06 in the second period was more systematic, emphasizing systematic, more was period second the in f h srie fr itm ad h lgl framework. legal the and victims for services the of

Kurir in the two time periods N=63 24% 29% 97% 6% 0% 2% 3% -

TABLE 4 TABLE

3/06 hog statistics, through

as well as

news 30

ihn society within increase in the variable regarding statistics, regarding variable the in increase coverage of

(Table 4) (Table Since some of the articles refer to the to refer articles the of some Since 1/13 N=78

13% 18% 10% 85% 15% . However, unlike in the case of of case the in unlike However, . 3% 8%

but through information on the the on information through but - domestic violencedomestic in present 3/13 wt seii fcs n the on focus specific with ,

Bl ic , March 11. 2013) 2013) 11. March , Fisher’sexact test 0.24 0.07* 0.09* 0.03** 0.03** 0.014** 0.014** (one sided)

CEU eTD Collection which story only The whatsoever. component social any without crime the on information f the in stories based incident the of part that is period first second the in first the in articles the articles of number the in decrease insignificant observe Kurir supported inthe case violence domestic of statistics on more be will there that hypothesis roles gender and stereotypes in all at addressed Blic violence domestic on legislation and victims for services statistics, mentioning period time first the in already we data, the in look closer a take we if However, legislation. and shelters Djordjevic, journalist of Nikolic, d isturbing

and , it was close to be statistically significant in the case of of case the in significant statistically be to close was it , Second, there was a significant increase in the expert source variable source expert the in increase significant a was there Second, Unlik more careful inrunning s be to have all they now law, Family the in Code, Criminal the in recognized to or that compare Work tha so data, intersect not did and sporadically, only it did whatsoeveror anyhavestatistics not did of availability greater is changed What Kurir Kurir

sta e had itc o dmsi voec rltd udr ad etns se o example for (see beatings and murders related violence domestic on tistics Mrh 3 2013). 23. March , time time . As mentioned above, the coverage the above, mentioned As . Blic different police and neighbo and police

period contained these sources these contained period and Blic s

of of time time Politika

Kurir Blic

and run database. In the last years, since domestic violence is violence domestic since years, last the In database. run

data t prosecutor’s office had office prosecutor’s t period contained expert source expert contained period

and in preserving the subordinated position subordinated the preserving in , Kurir ,

Politika

tatistics, sotheytatistics, are helpful…. the argues that: , available services for victims and the legal framework was framework legal the and victims for services available ,

Kurir, Kurir,

articles in the second second the in articles n vlaig h qaiy f vial saitc, Katarina statistics, available of quality the evaluating In Politika sc a therapy as such , police rs dominate as the sources for the articles’ story. Large story. articles’ the for sources the as dominate rs

irst period contains merely police source police merelycontains period irst but not inbut not thecase of had a decrease in the variable regarding statistics, statistics, regarding variable the in decrease a had

yet again, yet

had had

ttsissae ntttos which institutions statistics…state a

in (Table 3) (Table

significantly

on different

Politika o aues n te su o gender of issue the and abusers for e quoting an quoting

time time data, s

. What could be noticed be could What . period period

Politika.

the shifted to shifted (Interview 2,p.2) Blic Blic e …No one tried to tried one …No

larger Center for Social for Center expert source expert , whereas for whereas , , whereas 12% of articles of 12% whereas , that

of women. women. of

issues that were not were that issues contain information contain ubr f articles of number can observe can in the case of of case the in . Only 2% of of 2% Only . s

Politika (50%) and factual factual and Hence, the the Hence,

in the the in

than than that

we we CEU eTD Collection in the case of case of supported inthe mo be will there that and period time for decrease a positive small dramati any indicate not does increase this However, article. the for source a as experts containing articles the of 8% with period, second the in changed slightly has trend This approach. based incident covering stories the domes to approach factual the indicates which source, only the was police based incident period time first Kurir violence domestic S.P.S., example for (see Serbia in violence addressing domestic in problems the emphasizing institutionally story the to strength tosystematicallycommitment ofdomesticaddress violence. the problem January which contained Kurir , we can observe that observecan we , tic violence without any social social any without violence tic a woma a Similarly contrast, In

22. 2006), had an obvious aim to offer sensationalist story without any serious serious any without story sensationalist offer to aim obvious an had 2006), 22.

, which based on the newspaper the on based which , an c improvement in the coverage of domestic violence, but only shows that there is there that shows only but violence, domestic of coverage the in improvement c Politika

Politika expert source in the first period first the in source expert Blic ,

, n is a perpetrator. The title of the article, “Women rape too” (see Golosin, (seeGolosin, too” rape “Women article, the of title The perpetrator. a is n

n pitn ot h shrs hc sol be should which spheres the out pointing and , and these findings are not surprising at all. In the vast majority of the stories the stories the of majority vast the In all. at surprising not are findings these

(Table 4) (Table

o h peiu indicator previous the to it was close tobeing was statisticallyit significant. xet ore ue in used sources expert

statistically significant had 40% of the articles containing expert source, much more than more much source, expert containing articles the of 40% had for the use of use the for re Kurir

rils n h second the in articles

. Bearing in mind that 97% of the arti the of 97% that mind in Bearing . there was no single article with an expert quoted as a source in the the in source a as quoted expert an with article single no was there , but not in the cases of inthe , butnot expert source expert pr oblem focus, which could indicate the shift from the the from shift the indicate could which focus, oblem

articles orientation was expected. Hence, Hence, expected. was orientation shift. w cn observe can we , 32

time time Blic s

of (Table 5) (Table Blic

Blic,

was dealing with domestic violence in violence domestic with dealing was eid contain period the

and and

Feb eod eid gave period second . Politika

ruary

mrvd n re t combat to order in improved However, already in the first the in already However, cles in the first period were period first the in cles a

statistically insignificant insignificant statistically 25. 2013). 25. ing , with the side note that notethat the side , with

expert source, was was source, expert the hypothesis the

In the case of case the In an

additional Blic Blic ,

CEU eTD Collection domestic violence. d this and 1997), Meyers in more (see quo” pre the on based is coverage news and roles gender defined struct patriarchal the of consequence a is violence domestic of attempts the Blic al and poverty jealousy, <**p < .10,one .05,one tailed. tailed;*p State authorities response Abuser consequences Crime justification sourcesExpert shelters, legislationStatistics, Incident based stories Social focus stories Variable

Percentage of

crime (35%), in the second period period second the in (35%), crime and Third,

Kurir

utfcto o dmsi voec (8) O te n sd, utfcto of justification side, one the On (18%). violence domestic of justification

hr ws dces i te ubr f rils utfig h cie through crime the justifying articles of number the in decrease a was there

Unlike the first period in which more than a third of articles of third a than more which in period first the Unlike the

indicators of responsible of indicators

cohol cohol

violence is tolerated is violence

ab Politika use in all newspapers, statistically significant statistically newspapers, all in use - 1/06 established framework which is preserving “the status status “the preserving is which framework established N=44

11% 27% 41% 50% 50% 50% in the two in the two time periods 9% - TABLE 5 TABLE

in 3/06

ecrease suggests a weakening of the status quo of quo status the of weakening a suggests ecrease

Blic news 33

(see Babovic et al. 2010, 59 2010, al. et Babovic (see

es tha less coverage of

1/13 n

N=48 12% 21% 33% 33% 35% 65% a ure of society in which there which in society of ure 2%

fifth of the articles contained contained articles the of fifth 3/13 domestic violencedomestic in present

Fisher’sexact test - 64)

(one sided)

tried in the case the in . Hence, the Hence, . 0.56 0.32 0.15 0.29 0.08* 0.11 0.11

justifying

s are

of of CEU eTD Collection almost are examples of kinds thesecond These in periodnonexistent time in whatsoever. reference social any without view, B.O. of murder the with (see deals 2006) 10. March, love” of because death “To titled period first the in articles the of lead the and titles period first the be also can s the in that noticed it However, periods. time both the in used justification main the is jealousy status quo. and positive a is shift toward this step important approach, sensationalist the on based is which newspaper, that mind in Bearing period. time second the in articlesof kind violence domestic of justification of form some contained articles clearly state justify still explanations general more the from and approach away based moving incident indicates which crime, the for justification or reason the find to period second jealousy, in found mostly (2002,ideology” of violen domestic “why” the explain to attempts “…journalists’ the in lies problem the studies, feminist Taking a closer look in the specific articles containing justification, we can notice that notice can we justification, containing articles specific the in look closer a Taking Regarding On the other side, as argued by Bullock and Bullock by argued as side, other the On

domestic violence, although the recommendation in the in recommendation the although violence, domestic s

that . The findings suggest that much less articles less much that suggest findings The ce; whether the victim or the perpetrator is blamed depends on depends blamed is perpetrator the or victim the whether ce;

478). The “why” of domestic violence in the first period articles period first the in violence domestic of “why” The 478). the Kurir econd period the number of sensationalist titles is much lower, whereas in whereas lower, much is titles sensationalist of number the period econd

per s

more responsible coverage responsible more i cmaio t te is pro i wih almost which in period first the to comparison in , petrator for blamed isalwaystheviolence. tobe . However, in the second period as well, as period second the in However, . whereas whereas

h individual the s

of the articles were justifying the crime. For example, one one example, For crime. the justifying were articles the of poverty was th was poverty Kurir a

wom explanations to the more social social more the to explanations 34 .

a e most e n from the individual explanation point of point explanation individual the from n of domestic of

Cubert, who were drawing on drawing were who Cubert,

often in the second period second the in

Kurir mentioned justification mentioned violence that challenges the the challenges that violence

, a governmental

is a typical yellowtypicalpressa is there were 18% of this this of 18% were there high high

number of articles articles of number

prah with approach the underlyingthe a -

hr o the of third J.S are striving striving are of of

Handbook

Blic previous .,

Kurir in the the in

was was ,

CEU eTD Collection abuser contained stories the of fourth almost which in period, first the unlike Namely, consequences abuser to reference period articles consequencesabuser inthe second information onthe with cases”, “fresh is interpretation additional One anymore. newsworthy con not was abuser consequences abuser the the mentioning 2013, on by Accordingly, information the mentioning of amount the to contributed articles) 2002, from only code Criminal Serbian in act criminal a is violence the abuser in found be could explanation articles of 8% only consequences, abuser the on information the containing articles of 24% were there in decreased articles period decreased case the in supported was violence domestic for justifications contain which period second the f social than rather dominate, beyond well goes that suggest results These articles. such of 2% only articles the justificati crime different mentioning s

Fourth, n h cs of case the In

nme o css ece cut decisions court reached cases of number a , Blic

in the first period time articles in the

but this decrease but this that n h scn pro cnan hs information this contain period second the in Politika

in and

information on abuser consequences onabuser is information contained some form of crime justification, in the second period there were were there period second the in justification, crime of form some contained Blic the

no court decision being announced yet, announced being decision court no Kurir

incident based approach in which individual explanations for vio for explanations individual which in approach based incident s well as and Politika wees n h case the in whereas ,

Kurir

was significant. statistically not , but insignificantly. but , ocus

the newsworthiness of mentioning criminal consequences criminal mentioning of newsworthiness the , we can observe a decrease in the amount of the articles articles the of amount the in decrease a observe can we , in the fact that fact the in , whereas the number of articles containing this information this containing articles of number the whereas ,

is much less present in the second period, same as in as same period, second the in present less much is . Hence, the hypothesis that there will be fewer articles in articles fewer be will there that hypothesis the Hence, ons . . Unlike the first period, in which there were 9% of of 9% were there which in period, first the Unlike .

Bearing that, asearlier inmind d suggested, 35

most of the articles in the second period were were period second the in articles the of most

of Namely, unlike the first period, in which which in period, first the unlike Namely, Politika Politika

significantly less present in thesecond in present significantly less ,

which along with newsworthiness newsworthiness with along which whi

’s

coverage of domestic violence domestic of coverage h numb the ch ch in influenced the lesser use of of use lesser the influenced Blic .

In thecase of

. y 2006 by r f hs articles those of er h first The

(first period period (first sequences. sequences. Kurir potential omestic omestic lence Blic , the

for for .

CEU eTD Collection not was period time second the in supported. response authorities’ state the on information the of coverage news that violence domestic indicates only which number, low quite the still is questioning 15% articles authorities, of number the in increase an was there although than rather violence, domestic of reference Vuckovic, (see violence domestic of victims the for house safe another of building the initiate to refusing Social for Centre the criticizes articles the of one Namely, violence. domestic responding in responsibility Work Social for Centre the and police’ the of case of period second the in articles the of 15% violence, domestic combating for responsible quest articles the of 5% only which in period, first for significant was police) (e.g. authorities state relevant the of work the of consequences was supported not second the in articles more that of case the in observed be could results Similar information. this mentioning period second the in stories the of 13% only were there (24%), consequences questioning more is there that is articles period second the in noticed be could What Finally, Blic

did so Blic, the variable labeled as state authoritie state as labeled variable the Blic . improved little improved

whereas it was insignificant in the cases of cases the in insignificant was it whereas , March 11. 2013). This example This 2013). 11. March , in any ofthe newspapers .

Hence, the hypothesi the Hence, time time eid il oti te nomto o te abuser the on information the contain will period the the 36

eey inciden merely oe te ok f h sae authorities state the of work the ioned s’ response, which refers to refers which response, s’ suggests s that there will be more articles with articles more be will there that s

analyzed Politika

Kurir Kurir that there is a broader social broader a is there that bsd prah However, approach. based t close to being statistically statistically being to close .

and . He . Politika nce, nce, to the hypothesis hypothesis the

oe of role the cases of of cases the

. Unlike the Unlike . questioning

ok for Work

in the the in state CEU eTD Collection variablegoing direction, inthe unexpected namelydecreasing. statistically highly are response authorities’ dailies on based expectations mentioned above the with line in well are results orientation. dailies’ between difference the illustrate to order in other, the on combined perspective comparative in shows 6 Table sensationalist and <**p <***p < .05,one .01,one .001,one tailed. tailed;*p tailed; State authorities response Abuser consequences Crime justification sourceExpert shelters, legislationStatistics, Social focus Variable

Comparing the . We can observe that in the case the in observe can that . We Since

Blic

level of responsible news ofresponsible time coverageperiodslevel intwo between

covering

and

Kurir

, in contrast to contrast in ,

are close in respect to their approach, leaning towards tabloid towards leaning approach, their to respect in close are Blic+Kurir Blic+Kurir Blic+Kurir Blic+Kurir Blic+Kurir Blic+Kurir Blic Politika Politika Politika Politika Politika Politika Daily and s

of of

Politika Kurir Kurir ABLE Kurir

37 Politika

infcn, ih ny bsr consequences abuser only with significant,

combined 1/06 and

27 31 41 50 50% 11 24 6 , which has clear issue oriented approach, oriented issue clear has which , 9 1 2 5 6

% % % % % % % % % % % % % Blic

3/06 1/13

on the one side and and side one the on

all v

ariables of interest except state exceptstate interest ariables of

21 18 33 14 33 21 65% 12 11 2 9 7

% % % % % % % % % % % -

13 characteristics of the of characteristics Blic Fisher’sexact 0.32 0.015** 0.15 0.004** 0.29 0.0005*** 0.08 0.0003*** 0.11 0.485 0.56 0.006** Politika

and

Kurir ,

and

The The

CEU eTD Collection ae sois s edn u t cnld ta tee a a oiie infcn sit n the in shift significant positive a was there that conclude to us leading is stories based coverage thefirstisonly it was period poor very andthat in slightl lat the in 15% and former the Kurir stories articles focus social of number the in increase daily latter the of seriousness the with explained be supportedwas 2009 violenceafter domestic that hypothesis more us offer will and newspapers among differs articles focus towards violence domestic of coverage 5 expectations based onthedaily’s orientation to comparison in period first the in Politika society. Serbian in violence domestic of dimension to approach based incident merely press daily tabloid less or more the one. second the in 21% to period first the in 5% from increased .2 Discussion

show significant increase in the social focus stories focus social the in increase significant show

already in the first time period time first the in already Nevertheless, The The

had much higher number of practically all indicators of responsible coverage already coverage responsible of indicators all practically of number higher much had

eut la u t cnld ta al nlzd esaes ae hfe their shifted have newspapers analyzed all that conclude to us lead results igs change biggest

ther

in e will be will e sight Kurir

’s and and ’s o

t ol b observed be could

er, these results indicate that the the that indicate results these er, an the nature of the social focus stories in each in stories focus social the of nature the

i ncrease in the number of social social of number the in ncrease Blic

a uh as such

’s orientation towards shorter information and incident and information shorter towards orientation ’s than oil ou one focus social

B a

lic more social focus approach. focus social more Blic

for towards serioustowards journalism 38 and and Blic the the

Blic and in in

n h cs of case the in Kurir rmn aayi i te olwn chapter following the in analysis framing and Politika

. Kurir and

Although we do not observe not do we Although As already discussed in detail above, above, detail in discussed already As Kurir

, , Kurir

which stresses the social problem problem social the stresses which

hc i i acrac wt the with accordance in is which combined. in the second period, second the in , this daily had more social focus social more had daily this ,

e a observe can we

condition but not for not but

These results suggest that in in that suggest results These

ychanged positively focused articles regarding regarding articles focused oil ou art focus social

Although both Although

. The quality of social of quality The

of domestic violencedomestic of Politika daily a

with 28% in in 28% with hf from shift , which , .

significant significant T icles that that icles Blic he main main he

now and can .

CEU eTD Collection earlier mentioned As results? these explain we can How supported. not was period second the in newspapers analyzed all in consequences abuser the in articles in present the importance of to contrast period, first the with articles Handbook. the by suggested practices best with line in well goes in framework legal the and victims for services violence, domestic of that thestate’sondomestic violence influence coveragewas effectiveand posit for variable justification crime the in decrease both for statistics on information containing articles of number the in increase of cases the in changes important showed how tocover domestic effective,at casespart. violence was least this in based incident factual violence domestic recommendations main the of one that mind in Bearing period. second the in increased significantly articles of direction significant for significant One Espec of indicators specific Observing dailies Politika unexpected the a ially relevant is the the is relevant ially social ,

above mentioned information mentioned above Politika. ther

ern i mind in bearing combating domestic violence. in all analyzed newspapers, s newspapers, analyzed all in and that trainings for j for trainings that and omltd n h Handbook the in formulated ,

they are still suggesting that there is a posit a is there that suggesting still are they ws n nrae n xet ore vral for variable sources expert in increase an was e focus stories

result was a decrease in the in decrease a was result

Hence, the hypothesis that there will be an increase in increase an be will there that hypothesis the Hence,

prah in approach

of domestic violence domestic of significant increase in the articles reporting on the statistics statistics the on reporting articles the in increase significant semi - ournalists were aimed to shift the shift to aimed were ournalists tabloid the responsible news coverage of domestic violence violence domestic of coverage news responsible Blic 39

w dail two in Blic

ignific

and and n tabloid and Blic a t apoc analytically approach to was , we can conclude that teaching journalists journalists teaching that conclude can we ,

and information on information

Kurir and ant ies Kurir ,

one of the possible explanations of of explanations possible the of one Kurir in the case the in si .

c te ubr f oil focus social of number the nce Namely, there was a significant significant a was there Namely, . retto o tee ale in dailies these of orientation These results results These

was

A ive shift and recognition of recognition and shift ive lthough lthough

the abuser consequences abuser the lower than in than lower s ,

shelters and legislation and shelters of of Blic

Kurir Blic

focus from merely merely from focus

the number of the of number the and seem to suggest to seem

n significant and and ive. talking about talking Kurir h ise of issue the

Kurir Politika , which , and ,

CEU eTD Collection justification chang newspapers the sell that titles editors to due approach stereotyped accomplish change to resistance to harder much was coverage of frame the changing Hence, mainstreaming readership. mass claim this for to evidence orientation and policy editorial of consequence a as explained domestic of explanations stereotyped trainings, the in participate not did that mind the case. particular the in explanations suggest might results These period second the in newspapers period were “fresh cases”, fact the of light in explained be could results timing is results these artic when domestic violence was introduced as a criminal act in Serbia. Moreover, these these Moreover, Serbia. in act criminal a as introduced was violence domestic when not the right way towrite” published, be won’t it that, like not is which article an write we if and sensationalist something responsibly wrote tha said they problems, their about talked journalists …when violence domestic of Justification e i te eod eid with period second the in les Blic

from the individual focus individual the from

the newsworthiness of this information in the first per first the in information this of newsworthiness the project and ed ingreater between thetwotime periods detail. Kurir

However, except However, for is also supported by supported also is

, have journalists with nocourt dec and we have to write bloody and in the way we know is know we way the in and bloody write to have we and the the .

In the following chapter I will explain how the frame of crime crime of frame the how explain will I chapter following the In that similar, more or less less or more similar, , dtr oe ad hne te il ad write and title the changes and comes editor

. (Interview 1,p.1) although significantly lower in the case the in lower significantly although

teto hs hfe twrs oe f sca focus social a of more towards shifted has attention .

A ,

s Petrovic Ranito Politika some which

included in the articles the in included es ision of the criminal proc ision

the 40 to domestic violence domestic to that the most of the articles in the second time time second the in articles the of most the that utfcto o dmsi voec. ern in Bearing violence. domestic of justification searches , both ,

state representative in charge of the of charge in representative state

sensationalist approach and that and approach sensationalist Blic

the explanation the vic argues

and Kurir

was lower in all analyzed all in lower was :

that

edure iod, bearing in mind mind in bearing iod, contain contain t even if they they if even t

lead to sensationalist to lead of domestic violence domestic of s

yetavailable. violence could be be could violence of nearly Blic

and s

fifth editors gender Kurir

The the

of of .

CEU eTD Collection harderaccomplish, toeditorsresistance. to due above suggested as justification, crime of case the In coverage. violence domestic of framework the enrich and easier much editors through go to expected be could and trai that suggest might which violence, domestic of coverage news of framework the enriched have quoted sources expert and legislation shelters, statistics, on information factual ori sensationalist the of focus the shifting in effective were personnel news the for trainings and guidelines direction. unexpected the in going variable Blic of cases the in changed significantly response authorities state except variables of all Second, approach analytical the with and orientation issue the with line in well goes of cases the in than periods time both muchbetter in is articles variablesignificant ofinterest. However,itsquality change inany First, orientation. dailies between difference the illustrates clearly

the and al 6 which 6 Table Handbook guidelines were effective for for effective were guidelines Handbook Kurir

in the sec the in ented dailies towards social focus of domestic violence issue. What is more, is What issue. violence domestic of focus social towards dailies ented

compares ond time period time ond

Politika Blic

hn combined when , n h oe ie and side one the on

and 41

K These results suggest that that suggest results These urir Blic , which, as argued earlier in the thesis the in earlier argued as which, ,

and and , with only abuser consequences abuser only with , Kurir Blic .

hs ata information factual This and Politika Kurir this , the

did not have have not did n h other, the on

a much was Handbook Politika nings nings . ,

CEU eTD Collection in 1997) Meyers (see 6 6 features of. each frame consists I and frames mentioned violence. inf additional (c) and approach centered 3 presen sources one extraordinary an as violence (a) po in “living “weird”, “nonsocial”, as labeled usually are They people. of types certain to only happens violence that suggests justification, ( and problem social a than rather private a is violence domestic that indicating label, tragedy’ ‘family jealousy), and crime the poverty, for explanations abuse, individual (alcohol violence domestic of explanations stereotyped analyzed articles newspapers the in present 1 identified: ) .1.1 .1 Justificationa Chapter6 societal perpetrator

Justifying Feminist scholars emphasize scholars Feminist p most three the of analysis framing the present will I chapter this In

I will evaluate similarities and differences between the two periods in respect to the respect in to periods two andbetween the similarities differences I evaluatewill

frame ) 2 - just ) t in the articles providing stereotyped picture of domestic violence cases and cases violence domestic of picture stereotyped providing articles the in t centered approach rather than victim than rather approach centered – identificational

domestic violence or keeping the “status quo” the violence orkeeping domestic Framingdomestic violence coverage: consisting of the following features: (a) features: following the of consisting fctoa frame ificational stereotypes and l frame l frame

journalists’ articles in the sense that: sense the in articles journalists’ will will present the differences in the nature of the frames the of nature the in differences the present

frame - time incident and (c) the majority of neighbor and relative and neighbor of majority the (c) and incident time rfrig oty o utfctos f oetc violence domestic of justifications to mostly referring , ver

especially , ty”, and this frame consists of the following features: following the of consists frame this and ty”,

hc, hog te s o niho sources neighbor of use the through which,

pleasing rain niaig oil aspects social indicating ormation 42 ,

the problem of the “status quo” prese quo” “status the of problem the hc cnit of consists which - centered one, (b) portrayal of domestic domestic of portrayal (b) one, centered the c )

readership multiple sources used, (b) victim (b) used, sources multiple neighbor sources providing crime crime providing sources neighbor “The popular media play a key key a play media popular “The between three

an etrs (a) features: main rominent frames rominent

changing

regarding the regarding of domestic domestic of

mostly rvation rvation

(b)

- ,

CEU eTD Collection O murder. a being besides Criminal Code, Serbian the in actcriminal a is which violence domestic caseof a is this that stating even without murder a committed someone why reason the find to trying Adzic Vujanac, (see him stalking was victim the but relationship the end to wanted murderer the that claimed the of one example, For orientation. issue its to due Kurir analysis content quantitative the in shown As incident particular around isolat an was violence the (2003, deviance” that or pathology idea the reinforces media news the events, isolated genderwomen ofmen roles and perception patriarchal traditional in embedded are sources of majority the that noticed be could it Moreover, crime for motive mentioned period. s justification chapter, previous the in analysis content re une traditional through and roles gender established the in reflected is consensus 1999, (Meyers governed…” role uch as poverty, jealousy and jealousy poverty, as uch ain bten e ad women and men between lations in maintaining hegemonic consensus by helping those in power win the consent of the of consent the win power in those helping by consensus hegemonic maintaining in

were incident based based incident were As argued by Carli, “By presenting stories of violence against women as separate separate as women against violence of stories presenting “By Carli, by argued As most the that shows violence domestic justifying articles the at look closer A

providing e oe ril from article more ne Blic

certain motive of the crime. Finally, all these alleged “motives” for crime crime for “motives” alleged these all Finally, crime. the of motive certain Mrh 10, March , s, in the first period, with with period, first the in

aiming to find specific reason specific find to aiming 7). In the In 7). was je was

. lcohol 1603). 1603).

06. hs xml cery hw that shows clearly example This 2006). al Blic

ousy Bbvc t l 2010) al. et (Babovic

Serbian abuse M rprig on reporting , ost of the articles in the first time period are period time first the in articles the of ost

in the first time period in all in period time first the in

decreased in all in decreased 43

, portrayal of domestic violence this hegemonic hegemonic this violence domestic of portrayal

the vast majority of of majority vast the only articles is u is articles s

Blic of domestic violence through violence domestic of

f oit rgrig h established the regarding society of Politika a s husband murdering his wife uses uses wife his murdering husband ’s articles reported that neighbors that reported articles ’s

or motive or .

s hwd n h quantitative the in showed As newspa sing neighbors or relatives as relatives or neighbors sing , being more socially focused socially more being , s pe the

for domestic violence. domestic for newspapers rs in the second time second the in rs articles of articles the orait is journalist qual power power qual

analyzed Blic

reasons reasons

built built

and ed ed .

CEU eTD Collection of normal life suggests article the from excerpt mentioned above the striking, more is What behavior. violent the for “why” reason the finding of pattern the following are journalists present, not are reasons Kurir, that: states daughter his murdering reporting articles the of One period. time first the in violence domestic problem. perpetrator the of actions the for justification domes than issue social a “why” that implies often tragedy” “family as crime not is fami the of sphere private the into situated is violence domestic way, this are crimes these that jealousyare toblamed. f incident isolated an as violence domestic of understanding traditional and stereotypes reinforcing only is violence domestic for justification of kind This committed. is crime the “why” reason the is drunkenness” of state “the that conclude to us (I.I. aggressive” be to sayingthat neighborsfrom citations

January 27, 2006). 27, January the incident happened, making domestic violence something extraordinary rather than rather extraordinary something violence domestic making happened, incident the Kurir is violence domestic with dealing articles the in occurs that problem additional The

that if the father was drunk we could we drunk was father the if that

i voec, s utn te lm o te niiul, n often and individuals, the on blame the putting is violence, tic

. This way of portraying family violence, labeling it as a “family tragedy” rather rather tragedy”“family a as it labeling violence, familyportraying of way This . . hw ee mr sros rbes eadn the regarding problems serious more even shows

other crimes are crimes other

labeled as a “family tragedy” in the lead of a of lead the in tragedy” “family a as labeled Blic

, February 1, 2006). 1, February , This example indicates that even in the cas the in even that indicates example This ,

and that it does not have a social component. What is more, is What component. social a have not does it that and

“…he wasn’t drunk when he attacked his daughter” (I.C. daughter” his attacked he when drunk wasn’t “…he :

it is an accident, behind which usually which behind accident, an is it “ … he was drinking heavily” and “in that state he tended tended he state that “in heavily”and drinking was he 44

wtot mhszn te oil ou o the of focus social the emphasizing without , The way the sentence is constructed is constructed is sentence the way The justify his violent behavior violent his justify

r hc alcohol which or

large number of articles. In In articles. of number large oeae f the of coverage es in which stereotyped which in es a

ly indicating that it it that indicating ly father’s attempt of attempt father’s

as something part something as

there

is a reason a is “why” of of “why” ab provides provides leading s or use CEU eTD Collection addition, In violence. domestic to in present are violence the for explanations stereotyped However, the of only has period to comes it when articles social problem could articles period first the in violence beating wife recognizing not and tragedy’ ‘family quo” “status clear a is crime the that explicitly only Moreover, violence. of types other the to comparison m the in present tragedy” “family label the with along justifications mentioned above and This the lead that: in stated is it family, the in murder of attempt the on reporting article the In well. as articles emphasis and emphasized articles, of titles or leads (see the in motives subtitle stereotyped a as “Jealousy” has knife the with period time first the in violence jrt of ajority Kurir rils in articles Politika January 5,2006) suspect he because headher smashed and axe an with headin the several wifetimes his hit …he Kurir

and of the “justification” of domestic violence was largely present in the leads of the of leads the in present largely was violence domestic of “justification” the of

the s rils hw h hget ee o seetpd xlntos o domestic for explanations stereotyped of level highest the show articles ’s

Blic, . , as an issue oriented daily newspaper, shows much better quality of the the of quality better much shows newspaper, daily oriented issue an as ,

9% percent of the stories justifying the crime the justifying stories the of percent 9% rils r cery indicating clearly are articles

h cie tef s justifie is itself crime the

Politika

maintenance of maintenance eluy n alcohol and jealousy

the

d ht h ws haig n him. on cheating was she that ed r epii i saig ht oetc ilne s ciia act. criminal a is violence domestic that stating in explicit are

case of domestic violence. violence. domestic of case justification . One article dealing with a with dealing article One n cn notice can one old old social norms social

frame of domestic violence domestic of frame ab all b all s ae ot fe mnind utfctos for justifications mentioned often most are use . For d. 45 a e seen as maintaining the status quo for this for quo status the maintaining as seen e

different approach to domestic violence in in violence domestic to approach different ht oe te jsiiain, hc are which justifications, other some that

, niae ate mres as murders partner intimate s, . Hence, labeling domestic violence as a a as violence domestic labeling Hence, . Kurir

Kurir justification for justification T his pattern his

a ma rils in articles 2006). 6, January , small number of articles ment articles of number small

n who hurt his intimate partner intimate his hurt who n in some way some in

(P. Politika

R can be interpreted be can , and already in the first the in already and ,

- D.M., Kurir, Kurir, D.M., more even is violence the first time period, period, time first the

as well. Sim well. as . Moreover, . By putting putting By

domestic domestic

as the as ilarly most most ion

CEU eTD Collection of goals main the of structure patriarchal traditional the in embeddedness their to due change to harder much are frames that expected be could it However, period. time second the in information factual more much had stories violence journalists to chapte previous up putting and trainings organizing by cases violence domestic on report to how journalists teaching of strategy the problem. coverage thissocial of about learning of process to way 6 example Meyers 1999) quo” “status mentioned above the of preservation the to contributing are framework applying those than stricter much position subordinated in women keeping ro gender of perception the on based is behavior” s is which society, widely is Serbian behavior” the “immoral in of accepted perception The crime. the justify to order in used are roles gender established traditionally and predefined that see clearly can we example this In casefather murderinghis daughter isparaphrasing of thefather whoissaying that: one example, For present. are norms, social patriarchal reinforcing .1.2 From P Politika, January 27,2006) discrediti was she way this in and immoral “acting was she because daughter his attacked …he wards revious studies on the media coverage of domestic violence have indicated that the that indicated have violence domestic of coverage media the on studies revious

justifying perpetrator justifying an

responsible coverage r, the new the r, nihd rmwr t wie bu. ec, h piig at f domestic of part priming the Hence, about. write to framework enriched journalist .

ng his and the reputation of reputation the and his ng

focus the the

trainings adok o te journalists. the for Handbook

opeiy f dome of complexity A of the state the of

s indicated in the chapter chapter inthe s indicated

Serbian

s w o men to

to condemningto crime: the

as to eliminate the frame of frame the eliminate to as of domesticof violence? ,

prescribing them ‘moral’ ways of behavior of ways ‘moral’ them prescribing society with pre with society

on 46 Hne atce cnann ti patriarchal this containing articles Hence, . il o lre xet conservative extent large a to till

how to deal with deal to how les that men and women have, women and men that les

tc ilne s rca for crucial is violence stic other family members. family other - on journalist training on journalist established gender roles. gender established

As we could could we As

domestic violence provided provided violence domestic

jus w article reporting on the the on reporting article here are we on the weon are the here tification of domestic domestic of tification

(M. observe , Serbia used used , Serbia

D., “Immoral . responsible

which are which

(see for for (see

O , often , n the in ne of ne

CEU eTD Collection one ofthe sources was Inone period. time first the in assame period time second approach of b could violence domestic justifying framework the regarding shift negative This 2013). 15, January is period time second fi the in articles the than violencehavedomestic of justification containingarticles more is What decreased. violence domestic justifying articles the of (Ivanoska, that: a on reporting article one ab violence domestic about talk to journalists the by newspapers all in decreased to understand the existingcoverage domestic problems theviolence. in of problem this to refers experience. victim’s the on and stereo through violence use and poverty remained the most often mentioned justifications of domestic violence. domestic of justifications mentioned often most the remained poverty and use

…h cul age fr er bcue f oet ad svns alcohol Istvan’s and poverty of because years for argued couple “…the Kurir significantly has violence domestic justifying articles the of number the Although psil epand y h rcn cag twrs oe ali ad sensationalist and tabloid more towards change recent the by explained possibly e Basically, the framework of justification in justification of framework the Basically, Blic Blic

goes along goes , January 15, 2013). , January .

. In addition, it often lab often it addition, In .

as well, as “ captured typed explanations and rather and explanations typed Slaughtered his girlfriend because of jealousy of because girlfriend his Slaughtered

similar lines as lines similar

s tm pro. o eape oe f the of one example, For period. time rst husba

analyzed

offering the exam the offering

The state Handbook state The stating that: nd murdering his wife, it is stated, using neighbors sources sources neighbors using stated, is it wife, his murdering nd

in the second second the in of the articles reporting on a ma a on reporting articles the of Blic

els domestic violence c violence domestic els regarding the “why” of domestic violence domestic of “why” regardingthe 47

ples of good and bad practices for journalists journalists for practices bad and good of ples

Blic

time period, the nature of the frame the of nature the period, time i nt hne uh Jaos, alcohol Jealousy, much. change not did for

focus on the social aspect of the story story the of aspect social the on focus

media remained the same, only the quantity the only same, the remained this justification this

coverage of domestic violence domestic of coverage ases as ases

Blic n killing his girlfriend, his killing n troubling is that is troubling ”

(see Taskovic, (see

’s headlines in the the in headlines ’s

even more explicit explicit moreeven

“family tragedy” “family ab

in the in

those Blic used used use” use”

In , CEU eTD Collection norms social and embedded in values traditional preserving in media the of role to back us takes This newspapers. the sell not does it coveragesince do about write newspaper the of language and style the adjust to tendency a is there that is concluded be could What editorialargues policy inthe newspapers, that: S of Association Journalists’ the from Kovac, Kristina themselves. editors to comparison Radisic, article, joint (see: audience reading the attract to order in with stories rare newspapers daily Serbian all in media the of attention of lot a drew which story the on article the from is excerpt mentioned above The crimes. violent other in unlike cases, violence domestic in crime the of justification that shows clearly example This eun h atce n sy o orait t w to journalists to say attention. and article the return manyother but topics, these about only not experience, own my from Iknow often.fault journalists’ not it’s again, then But all. at justify read rather would people is, it simply how is people this unfortunately values…and and lowest those appealingread, find to are tend stories the that is editors the to matters What For 2013) guy The cheatinghim. wasshe on suspected hebut withStela, love in washe saidHe Blic

articles to the audiences’ tastes. Hence, even when journalists journalists when even Hence, tastes. audiences’ the to articles

newspapers such as as such newspapers since both the both since , February 15

society and whichsociety are and in women keeping mestic violence mestic Politika

a a jaos n possessive… and jealous was (Inter

follow up on the same incident, this story was portrayed in a dramatic way way dramatic a in portrayed was story this incident, same the on up follow , the pressure to write sensationalist stories comes very often from the from often very comes stories sensationalist write to pressure the , view 4 , 2013).

murderer and the victim the and murderer , p. 2 , p. ,

editors could be those gatekeepers who prevent responsible responsible prevent who gatekeepers those be could editors

Blic )

stories with sensationalist titles, which I don’t I which titles, sensationalist with stories

and Kurir 48

jit art (joint wih r mc ls ise retd in oriented issue less much are which ,

were young students and as one of the of one as and students young were a subordinated position. rite

icle, Kurir, February 15, 15, February Kurir, icle, Kurir against women against

oehn ta draws that something , February 15, 2013; Subota, 2013; 15, February , s , editors tend to tend editors , maintaining

erbia talking about about talking erbia is a typical pattern pattern typical a is are trained are which are deeply deeply are which

“status quo” quo” “status

how to to how CEU eTD Collection byBuzawa Buzawa intheir study and a of profile special no is there that suggests like look to supposed is profile perpetrators’ how of stereotypes peo of kinds certain to only happens violence domestic cases violence domestic in cited p neighbors, of Aside in “living “weird”, “nonsocial”, as labeled usually are They people. of types certain to only happens violence that mostly, quoted sources neighbor of use the through suggests, citizens, everyday 6 6 covered violence topic ofdomestic the Kurir “why” Reasons in only changed violence domestic of justification regarding quo”. “statuschanginggeneral affects the little this society,thus for mentions article one only since violence, domestic of justification regarding Only society. in embedded m articles, period second the in present more much are violence domestic of victims the for important .2.1 .2

h crime. the The use of sources in in of sources use The

The role of identificational frame identificational roleof The in both time periods, whereas only whereas periods, time both in rmn prertr o dmsi voec in violence domestic of perpetrators Framing information factual that shows analysis content quantitative Although edia frames are much harder to change since they are reflecting the social norms social the reflecting are they since change to harder much are frames edia

Nevertheless, the the

could be observed as a pattern in the first time period articles. This pattern This articles. period time first the in pattern a as observed be could perpetrator committed the crime remained roughly the same for same the roughly remained crime the committed perpetrator olice

and so called so and Politika Politika preserving

in the first time period, time first the in s edrhp s h ot dctd emn o Serbian of segment educated most the is readership ’s

on domestic violence:on domestic . hw mjr mrvmn i te ei framework media the in improvement major shows

unidentified unidentified

Politika a

domestic domestic

in quo” maintaining “status stereotypes on domestic violence domestic on stereotypes 49

showed significant improvement in improvement significant showed “newspaper sources” are the most often often most the are sources” “newspaper violence perpetrator, violence

and they are reinforcing the idea that that idea the reinforcing are they and a ple.

eti way certain its q its esae atce reinforce articles Newspaper Hence, the media frameworkmedia Hence, the uantity lthough the literature literature the lthough

, as different from from different as , but not in its nature. its in not but

s strongly argued strongly s

any justificati any

poverty”.

Blic

ht is that how it how

and on

CEU eTD Collection newspapers the in period experi are victims when and story, the to central victimization women’s about analyses and language feminist place they when frame feminist a have to considered reference to 2006) 24, March reallyhappened” what know “onlytheylike statements the with cri a portray to tend “good articles the a neighbor”, as rather but “weird” or “unsocial” as perceived not is “why” perpetrator reason when the Hence, of explanations the to us leads and victim the from focus the shifting s neighbors the Quoting perpetrator. the on focus to rather and murdered, was someone that is, that and story, the of point main the from away move example This stated, using sources neighbors’ that: articles. related violence domestic in cited sources of majority vast the up made neighbors and police or no practically ences in their own words” (1999, words” own their in ences s rud y yry “es tre aot ilne gis wmn … cn be can (…) women against violence about stories “News Byerly, by argued As that and man, t good a was Aleksandar that claim they but names, their say to drunk.didn’t want wasn’t They was buthe wine, drinking with friends, he nigh tragic the On chapte previous the in analysis content quantitative the in shown As battere psyc a violence considered be more not interpersonal and should events whereas aggression, physical course of forms milder batterersinfluence to tend all life dynamics that that appears know It group. we homogeneous minimum, a At hey (I.I.,with him. Fe troublesBlic, had never In the article reporting on a on reporting article the In

hopathological disorders. hopathological the social com suggests

. In this way domestic violence is violence domestic way this In . few expert sources expert few

that there is a tendency in the articles covering domestic violence to violence domestic covering articles the in tendency a is there that t, before coming home, Aleksandar was in the local store local the in was Aleksandar home, coming before t,

ponent oftheproblem. analyzed s r mr lkl t dsly significant display to likely more are rs

husband murdering his wife and committing suicide it is is it suicide committing and wife his murdering husband

dedicate attention mostly to the perpetrator and to the the to and perpetrator the to mostly attention dedicate

quoted (2003,

391).

me as “an unexpected tragedy” and to conclude conclude to and tragedy” unexpected “an as me 50) in the first time period in in period time first the in 50

As suggested above, a above, suggested As

placed bruary 1,2006) aying that “he was a good man” man” good a was “he that aying

to a private private a to

(see for example Miric, example for (see allowed to talk about their about talk to allowed

rticles in the first time first the in rticles Blic sphere, without any without sphere,

in Kurir r, there were were there r, . Rather, Rather, . Blic is , . CEU eTD Collection responsibility police not reacting for of ontime: on extraordinary as ‘unexpected’. portrayed rather are violence domestic the before long violence suffering was victim the that indicating a no almost However, time. of period long a for violence psychological or physical confirm period case the domestic violencefind theirwith the wayfatal which are tothethoseoutcome. newspapers in involved be to likely domestic as people more such characterize those helped from This apart social. or set neighborly were individuals and couples nonsocial “…quiet, articles: so in as similar is perpetrator the perceptionof This violence. domestic of perpetrator the of profile particular a thereis that indicat example This saying that: For articles. period example, time first the in pattern common a as identified are happen to crime Moreover, neglected. is articles of perpetrator, the of perception neighbors’ ana they u for afraid was daughter My her. to happens something until react cannot they that time every her telling were Policemen m which scaredh them even about bad anything heard neighbors, the to according building, the in one no but neighbors, the with contact much no with reticent, was …Dragan

ht oetc ilne s o a one a not is violence domestic that

of of n h articl the in bs” (Bullock abuse” lyzed

Blic are hr i ol oe xml in example one only is There

, with less than a fifth reporting on battering. on reporting fifth a than less with , capab , for example, there were 57% of stories with the fatal outcome in the first the in outcome fatal the with stories of 57% were there example, for , es that articles are quoting are articles that es le to do…. (Adzic, Blic, todo….(Adzic, 2006) le March 24, rprig n a on reporting e

n Cbr 2002, Cubert and me of the previous studies in which it is argued that in the the in that argued is it which in studies previous the of me ore.Blic, 5,2006) (H.D., March

egbr ore camn that claiming sources neighbor

o klig i parents his killing son whereas the experience of the victim in the majority the in victim the of experience the whereas 51 - time incident. Women are usually victims of of victims usually are Women incident. time

9) Wa i mr, ot f h css of cases the of most more, is What 490). Blic sources which are supporting the perception the supporting are which sources

n h frt ie eid niaig the indicating period time first the in s too, because she knew what knew she because too, s Literature suggests and experts experts and suggests Literature ,

egbr ore ae quoted are sources neighbor

cul story actual e - th ie vns ht are that events time y i nt expect not did ey

and cases of of cases and im, rticles are rticles

the In CEU eTD Collection offering stereotypicalofthe explanations were Moreover,neighbors’. than sourcesothermore add to encourage to journalists was responsible violence domestic towards of coverage 6 andemphasizes theperpetrator crime themotives ofthe unexplainable something behaves he how examp This father hisdaughter, murdering are paraphrased: neighbors persons. of types particular a as perpetrators of perception the to the perspective the from shifted is focus the him, of description neighbors’ on and case. the not is this that suggests literature above, excerpt This wife, iswritten that: it perpetrator”. the of “profile certain a is .2.2 more issue oriented newspaper, oriented issue more

not Including O h but strange, neighbor. bit a was He cheerful. was he night and that him with sitting were We him. to happened what knows one No gun(Mi inthe air. with shoot to and party to liked He work. the outside different completely w As Kurir

ne of the goals of the trainings and one one and trainings the of goals the of ne to

le of the problem the of quote neighbors if they are supporting or justifying the crime and when they are they when and crime the justifying or supporting are they if neighbors quote e found out, Peric was known as calm and peaceful guy at work, but but work, at guy peaceful and calm as known was Peric out, found e

suggests goes along suggests

and if the perpetrator does not fit the profile then the case is presented as presented is case the then profile the fit not does perpetrator the if and more sources more (Dju

ric, January Politika, 9,2006)

that we should easily identify the perp the identify easily should we that that there is a predefined perception how perception predefined a is there that

similar lines of similar I adto, hs xep sit te teto o the of attention the shifts excerpt this addition, In . lisic, Kurir,lisic, January 23,2006)

of domestic violence domestic of

to addressdomesticto social violence a problem as Politika

Blic

In the article reporting on a on reporting article the In violent act. argues:Ranitovic AsTamara Petrovic

used in using neighbor’s sources to indicate that there that indicate there sources neighbor’s to in using 52

of the import the of

as well as and situated into private sphere. private into situated and In addition, b addition, In

neighbor’s sources sources neighbor’s

r wrig n a good a and working ard ant etrator, although as mentioned as although etrator, y focusing on the perpetrator perpetrator the on focusing y

a In the article reporting on a on reporting article the In guidelines in the Handbook the in guidelines

perpetrator looks like and like looks perpetrator victim and thus the thus and victim

husband murdering his murdering husband that

contributed victim and and victim a journalists Although Although

social :

CEU eTD Collection that: saying a on reporting article one In information irrelevant completely him earlier made indicated what of explanations possible the to and perpetrator atte of focus the shifting of example another is article This relative was as a used source articles. Kurir, sources) terms. insensationalist the of change the regarding framework resistance clear a is there that indicate journalists with interviews did, they shows analysis content and violence), (e.g. article the of elements factual embedde deeply to responsible measuring variables the changing However, coverage. other the of most and sources expert the in increase an aspect social a with stories publish t noted, already As

egbr an neighbor manya because is it thought I anymore. same the wasn’t He in the sourcessecondAlthoughexpert in ofperiod time thenumber increased bring to (Interviewp. 3) 1, new something want we and jo of quality general The unreliable. is it and source one have you basically so newsroom”… to known “source or source” “unnamed worse, even or one only not sources, more include should (journalists) They

n h atce eotn o a ma a on reporting article the In

sd o drs te issue the address to used “None of them had regular job, so they lived from part time jobs in agricultur in jobs time part from lived they so job, regular had them of “None wards since he is a goat grower.awards goat he since is , journalists of journalists , d stereotypes and stereotypes d rltvs sucs eand present, remained sources relatives’ d e diinl rbe i ta tee s rssac fo te editors the from resistance a is there that is problem additional he

ubn mreig i wife, his murdering husband Blic

, overall overall

. What quantitative content analysis shows is that there is there that is shows analysis content quantitative What . which is believed to increase the newspapers’ readership. newspapers’ the increase to believed is which

inclusion of inclusion and

s econd, although editors might allow the change in the in change the allow might editors although econd,

Kurir eg jsiiain f crime of justification (e.g. framework is much harder to accomplish. First, du First, accomplish. to harder much is framework mreig i itmt prnr n he and partner intimate his murdering n 53

especially are pressured to bring into the story the into bring to pressured are especially (Mile

services for victims, legislation, statistics on statistics legislation, victims, for services n wih s ad o accomplish. to hard is which in, nkovic, Blic,nkovic, January 11,2013) ntion from ntion

pten n ot of most in pattern a of the glory for getting for glory the of neighbor’ a urnalism is worse, is urnalism the the state represent state seetpd neighbor stereotyped , omt h crime the commit a terrible murder to the the to murder terrible

source was quoted quoted was source the child, r

ative and ative Blic overall overall longer longer As . and

e” to a e

CEU eTD Collection the talking is experts about the problem ofviolence tolerating inSerbia: of one violence, domestic of victims of problem the with dealing article focus social periods, time both the in period placing inthegroup perpetrators ofwho thepeople are friendly. not 2013). 10, January wasn he and grumpy and that: saying quoted is source neighbor’s mother his murdering son example, For act. violent the of explanations stereotypical offer people ordinary suggest Dudvarski, example for (see “Monster” the side ofthe perpetrator. from crime the for motives possible the of explanations the on concentrated less and centered sour expert no the with enriched is sources around framework the that noticed be could it but well, as violence for explanations e supported by emphasized as although murder, the for explanation an is poverty in (Ivanoska,

had to kill someone and on some level they reason “if I am good no one will will one no good am I “if reason they level some on and someone kill to had t a understand to need the have People higher much the With articles sensationalist However, Kurir that domestic violence happens only to certain types of people typesof certain onlyto happens violence domestic that Blic

the literature ondomestic violence.the articles in the second tim second the in articles , January 15. January , e a al atce i te eod eid in period second the in articles all, at ces . Kurir’s

hs xep ge aog h sm lines same the along goes excerpt This inclusion of inclusion

articles in the seco the in articles Politika t oilzn wt ams ayn” (Stojanovic anyone” almost with socializing ’t

2013). number of social focus articles in comparison to comparison in articles focus social of number

expert sources. Unlike the first period in which there were there which in period first the Unlike sources. expert

has shown improvement in the quality of sources. In the In sources. of quality the in improvement shown has

In this article it is it article this In e period are using neighbor sources with stereotypical with sources neighbor using are period e

are Kurir

nd period are stil are period nd yia for typical 54 errible crime and motives someone motives and crime errible

aur 1, 03 o “Beast” or 2013) 10, January suggested Kurir Kurir l quoting neighbor sources who sources neighbor quoting l

as n otn ae aes uh as such labels have often and

h atce i te is time first the in articles the that the fact the couple lives couple the fact the that in the article reporting on a on reporting article the in

em o e oe victim more be to seem

“Dane was very strange strange very was “Dane

who are different fromaredifferent who -

Rakocevic, rir ti i not is this arlier, Blic which

and and Kurir Kurir still - ,

CEU eTD Collection on remains violenceand by conducted issues societal mostly is there incident particular later) in 5% former, in (8% period time wi periods time two the between changed they have and articles focus social the in topics the observe increased articles that showed analysis content Quantitative Handbook. advices main the of one and journalists for trainings the of goals major the of one that in way? it present the media 6.3 is wellest of kinds Only readership. the attract those to order in stories in bring to editors the by pressured often are journalists above, as indicated hand, other the On stories. stereotyped these read to expect people argues, expert this forward. move to hard is Namely, it which from circle vicious a is there the fact the in is people Accordingly, ll

Examining societal frame: frame: societal Examining be

A closer look at the small number of social focus articles of articles focus social of number small the at look closer A present S wh bad something did decided her”. tokill victim hence me, kill to reason a have

dailies combined. It increased in increased It combined. dailies hift the ablished, issue oriented newspaper ing

traditional understanding of gender roles is deeply embedded in society, a society, in embedded deeply is roles gender of understanding traditional

one of the important problems with the frame that violence happens to certain to happens violence that frame the with problems important the of one . Namely, one article from article one Namely, . ed the

the

in the remaining of theframinganalysis. part

sign ugs soito o Sri poie ol statistica only provides Serbia of Association Judges

focus f focus ificantly the pure factual level factualpure the r

o (Djordjevi m

in the the Blic merely incident based approach to approach based incident merely a Domestic v Domestic c, Politika, Februaryc, Politika, 28, 2013)

ata approach factual and

Blic suggest Politika Kurir , with more or less stable readership. with more orless, stablereadership. 55

reporting on reporting Politika (see N.B.J. N.B.J. (see

s , from 5% to 21% percent of articles if we if articles of percent 21% to 5% from ,

iolence is a social problem but problem social a is iolence

that even in the stories not built around built not stories the in even that as well, but not significantly. What were What significantly. not but well, as

resists to resists

ahr hn n nltc n, raising one, analytic an than rather the the Blic

the research on domestic violence domestic on research the ubr of number , February 13. 2006). February13. ,

this tabloid approach since it since approach tabloid this Blic

a en someone someone en

social focus one was one focus social and l data on domestic domestic on data l the Kurir social focused focused social

in the first the in The same same The f the of

nd as nd do a CEU eTD Collection frame? the of focus social in stories analysis, content quantitative the in suggested already as Namely, changes. is above quotedexcerpt: of journalist Djordjevic, Katarina by argued As engagement. state’s better demands which problem, social serious a as violence domestic an is example This on domestic violence that: saying expert an quoting is journalist the day, victims’ International the on reporting articles the of one In problem. social serious a is violence domestic that indicated and responsibility information, factual of Aside (50%). Blic (see violence domestic on data statistical offering is of case the problem in covered was story

and f e ae coe look closer a take we If s writing by i that believe the affect to can want we We articles violence. of victims are who be to try We incomparable statistics. country; t on data exact no is …there Kurir whereas felony, a is order public dome of Disruption perpetrator. the punish to and violence domestic of victims the protect to is research this of aim The mportant (Interview topic. 2,p.1) , which is Kurir Blic Blic stic violence act. is acriminal ’s social focus articles from the first period show period first the from articles focussocial ’s

and a aray ugse above, suggested already as , .

In In one article reporting on reporting article one In oie jdcay n Cne fr oil ok are Work Social for Center and judiciary police,

a Kurir Blic

clear illustration of illustration the clear prpit ilsrto of illustration appropriate the partners of partners the ’s Politika

increased significantly in amount, but what happened with the naturethe happenedwith what but amount, increasedsignificantlyin

rils e a osre a observe can we articles

(Djord

but with additional reference on the social social the on reference additional with but

t h scn pro atce w cn bev important observe can we articles period second the at change he number of persons vic persons of number he

I wo I jevic, Politika, Februaryjevic, Politika, 2006)

n’t say the state, but rather those women women those rather but state, the say n’t

the

(Basov

f h s the of difference indailies the rise of domestic violence cases, the journalist journalist the cases, violence domestic of rise the Politika

56 Politika ubr f rils eerd to referred articles of number

Politika ic, Politika, Januaryic, Politika, 26, tate’s

and and Kurir

shift in quality, from merely factual factual merely from quality, in shift had much more social focus articles articles focus social more much had s omtet o respons to commitment ’s

the policy , January 30. 2006). 2006). 30. January , tims of violence in our in violence of tims author of the article from which which from article the of author

a ’

similar factual approach as in asfactualapproach similar orientation: orientation: regarding

2006)

uh an such running running

aspect ome ome In contrast to contrast In

the ibly

of the the of state’s cover

CEU eTD Collection the perpetrators violence of domestic (see in abusers for therapy as problem. isolated private a as than rather Furthermore, sphere, public the in violence the situates vio domestic of problem the on attention draws example This violence, sourcesayingexpert isquoted an that: stories. focus social in violence domestic Namely, between observed easily be could the SerbianTadic, society (see Kurir Handbook, the in guidelines major the of one with accordance in are examples mentioned above The indicating social problem howserious domestic violence is: Ser embedde of harmfulness and problem the questioning is violence” of root “The titled commentary one Namely, one. oriented problem social more to approach bian society (see Petkovic, Petkovic, (see society bian

also had commentary on domestic violence suggesting how se how suggesting violence domestic on commentary had also human rights calendar. dat convenient of time in only topic the becomes violence domestic society our …in second the in However, sta the influence to attempt newspapers the of example an is article This hidde is inSerbiaWomen are helpless. violence the family the in and shoulder, their tap and back their state The Work. Social the for to Centre and police the to violence reported women murdered nine year Last Politika

and Politika

that is to write about domestic violence not only when an incident happens. incident an when only not violence domestic about write to is that

went well beyond well went

dealt with the topics not even mentioned in the other two daili two other the in mentioned even not topics the with dealt

one article that article one hr i sil hg lvl f oeac o voec and violence of tolerance of level high a still is there

(Djordjev Kurir time time Blic Blic

the other two dailies two other the Jnay 3 2013). 13. January , , March 3.2013). period as well, the difference in the quality of coverage of quality the in difference the well, as period

(Vu

and and ic, Politika, Januaryic, Politika, 10.2013)

reports Djordjevic, Djordjevic, kovic, Blic,February 25.2013) In an In cannot protect them, friends are turning turning are friends them, protect cannot Kurir 57

article reporting on the problem of domestic domestic of problem the on reporting article

on the opening of the Centre for work with with work for Centre the of opening the on

on the one side and and side one the on Politika

in terms of topics covere topics of terms in n mr cmetr i clearly is commentary more One

lence in the Serbian society and society Serbian the in lence ,

February 2013). 26. d patriarchal stereotypes in stereotypes patriarchal d rious this problem is in is problem this rious

Politika

es in the in es

te’s reaction. te’s on the other the on d related to related d n.

es, such such es, .

CEU eTD Collection domestic for justifications stereotypical use to not trainings the on advised were journalists overall “disturb” not did they since framework stereotyped accomplish to easier much was violence on statistics and adding newspapers analyzed the of journalists Blic in reporting more, is What violence. domestic for ofview.point orientation issue earlier, mentioned violence.As domestic justifyingperiod time second the in articles no periods. the j of case the in observed be could framethe natureof the meaningfulin changesconcludethat to leadingus 6.4 domestic violence coverage. oriented issue and between difference the However, well. as nature its in but coverage of amount in only not newspapers, three all in period time second ustification

Discussion toward

factual information factual Kurir three the of analysis frame The unl Hence, rmwr jsiyn dmsi voec ws uh adr o accom to harder much was violence domestic justifying framework T he nature of the frame has not changed much, except much, changed not has frame the of nature he

provides mr tbod prah Te neves ih h sae ersnaie n with and representative state the with interviews The approach. tabloid more s al comparison to the first period. The possible explanation lies in the recent shift of shift recent the in lies explanation possible The period. first the to comparison

and frame has changed in its its in changed has frame

Blic k te te to rms scea frame societal frames, two other the ike Politika for

continue continue s

Politika of the coverage of domestic violence. However, the change of the of change the However, violence. domestic of coverage the of

relevant to the story the to relevant

on the other is cle is other the on to use stereotypes use to

oe pc t apoc ay oi fo a oe analytical more a from topic any approach to space more

extent used extent most prominent frames in frames prominent most suggest that suggest Blic semi oitl frame societal

58 em t idct ee wre condition worse even indicate to seems - arly affecting the difference in the quality of quality the in difference the affecting arly

tabloid tabloid

such as services for victims, legal victims, for services as such

in their explanations of the reason “why” reason the of explanations their in but not in its nature between the two time time two the between nature its in not but changing the qualit the changing Blic bt o i te te two. other the in not but ,

and

appear

tabloid in Blic Politika s

o e mrvd n the in improved be to , Kurir Kurir y of articles through articles of y s used s

which has almost has which

ls. Although plish.

on the one side side one the on and and

byjournalists

framework framework Politika

for s The The

CEU eTD Collection sources expert of number in covered topics beyond well went orientation, violence. domestic address clearly tolerance of level the of critique the as such violence, domestic of component social the more much included articles articles focus social period first of cases the in especially from which the centraliswidespread and problem, to contributing are tragedy” “family a as presented usually victim regarding improvement some sourc these neighbor all more, is What cases. violence domestic of coverage the of pattern the remained perpetrator the of explanations stereotypical offering sources neighbor However, violence. sourcesincluded expert people of types social toshow will responsibility. of cases the in attention. draw which stories the explanation coverage responsible Editors editors. the from coverage, violence regardingdomestic jealousy) (e.g. violence h ol fae ht hw pstv and positive shows that frame only The The identificational frame, identificational s r mc mr fcsd n h prertr Scn pro atce show articles period Second perpetrator. the on focused more much are es Blic , is that tabloid and sensationalist approach of these newspapers is based on the the on isbased newspapers ofthese approach and sensationalist is thattabloid

changed in the cases of of cases the in changed

and

in the in

in the a the in

n te adoks udlns fee eape o go practice good of examples offered guidelines Handbook’s the and of violence of Kurir semi

ce a te aeepr wo rvne te hf twrs more towards shift the prevented who gatekeepers the as acted hc ques which se

Hence, the Hence, attempts of changing the frame. In the cases of cases the In frame. the changing of attempts -

tabloid and tabloid rticles and they are they and that

happens violence domestic that suggesting Politika

- remained at the at remained in centered approach. However, stereotypical explanations stereotypical However, approach. centered , which ,

ind h amuns o gne seetps n the and stereotypes gender of harmfulness the tioned

they indicate in the in indicate they Serbian tastes of readership of tastes

Kurir tabloid oriented dailies, oriented tabloid wl i ln wt te xettos ae o its on based expectations the with line in well ,

choosing to offer what is expected w expected is what offer to choosing might suggestmight 59

socie

and

ennfl hne s h societal the is change meaningful t olerated violence in Kurir level of factual approach factual of level ty and the pressure on the state to more more to state the on pressure the and ty Blic

and in the sense that there were more more were there that sense the in interviews that they faced they that interviews

the shifting the focus of attentio of focus the shifting the the social component of domesticof component social the

influence editors’ rigid attitude rigid editors’ influence Blic. Blic

Namely,

and and Serbian society.Serbian Kurir

, second period period second , Blic to only certain only to t contained it . Unlike the the Unlike .

and and ithout any ithout

pressure pressure

frame Kurir

n a , ,

CEU eTD Collection quantitative part of theanalysis. the why is that and frames of quality and tabloid norms. patriarchal and stereotypes rigid change to readership the affect to trying of challenge the accept to and responsibility social show to resistance editors’ chan not did significant the therapy of perpetrators domestic for violence. state the of work In sum, the quantitative content analysis and the frame the and analysis content quantitative the sum, In change in the factual information factual the in change

ali ap tabloid ge much, except the societal the except much, ge

on addressing this problem this addressing on proach ,

seily of especially

frame. major . In addition, it contained an article dealing with dealing article an contained it addition, In . on Blic 60

domestic violence domestic

The most plausible explanation lies in the in lies explanation plausible most The and improvement was identified only in the the in only identified was improvement Kurir ,

r peetn te hf i the in shift the preventing are analysis show that there was a was there that show analysis

E presented ditorial policy and semi and policy ditorial , whe , reas frames reas - CEU eTD Collection prevents which logic better than in Politika for true especially is This shift positive small rather but improvement, dramatic any suggest present to extent its with state the used sources expert victims, t c responsible measuring variables newspapers of cases the in Namely, violence. domestic of coverage responsible most the important findings summarize me let violence, domestic covering on initiative state to was media straigh to lead not does media in involvement state that shown has Serbia in violence domestic of coverage news the improve to aim an with media the and state the between interplay the yet known, public. general the on influence to aim m pro ae nihd with enriched are period ime

Second, the framing analysis and the interviews suggest that the media has its own its has media the that suggest interviews the and analysis framing the Second, analysis content quantitative the First, a has side, one the on state, The , change in the articles the in

an issue oriented newspaper, oriented issue an improve Blic Blic tforward results. tforward

h nw cvrg o dmsi violen domestic of coverage news the

adopted adopted and

and

the in the paragraphsin thefollow. to . Kurir

Kurir coverage of coverage Although significant, this increase this significant, Although a

infcn sit n epc t te vrl framework overall the to respect in shift significant Strategy, Blic ,

, already inthe first

e ol observe could we with much less stereotyped crime justif crime stereotyped less much with

and and

Chapter7 information on statistics on domestic violence, services for for services violence, domestic on statistics on information I have shown in this thesis what the reaction of the Serbian Serbian the of reaction the what thesis this in shown have I

Media’s role as an agenda setter for public opinion is well is opinion public for setter agenda an as role Media’s

vrg o dmsi voec. h atce i te second the in articles The violence. domestic of overage

Kurir domestic violence domestic organized dopted the dopted where where

with their more sensationalist approach, and less for less and approach, sensationalist more their with – 61 trainings and the Handbook the and trainings

the coverage of domestic violence was much much was violence domestic of coverage the

Conclusion time time

a hwd infcn pstv sit towards shift positive significant showed infcn pstv cag i ms o the of most in change positive significant new s new period analyzed with regards to regards with ce trategy and trategy

, in th in

suig ht h mda a a has media the that assuming

e quality of coverage of quality e

. for the overall situation overall the for semi action ications present ications

the factual information factual the - , tabloid

managed to some to managed p rograms

of covering covering of and tabloid and

does not does .

with an with Hence, Hence, n .

CEU eTD Collection effect has violence domestic of coverage news responsible more influence of case the in except much changed not has framework overall the whereas information, factual accepted perception soci violencea rather of than domestic private as a serious boards editorial demand country, the position subordinated a in are women mind in Bearing readership tastes. to coverage the adjust readers, possible as many as towards aimed side, other consisting readership of quality the improvement. for room much is there although started, has violence domestic of understanding Serbian change slow a that suggest might this and trends positive important shows changed a they Since editors the Handbook used be not should the and trainings although just periods, that recommended time two the between meaningfully violence domestic Politika s , but for the overall framework to change, much more time is needed is time more much change, to framework overall the for but , n u, pstv sit s bevd n h qatttv pr o aayi regarding analysis of part quantitative the in observed is shift positive a sum, In in difference the explain extent large a to could orientation dailies the in Differences s ter oe ant e neetmtd O a oe oiie oe te oitl frame societal the note, positive more a On underestimated. be cannot role their , U .

eue t priiae n h tanns and trainings the in participate to refused nfortunately, nfortunately, be to has which and published be can content which deciding gatekeepers the re hc ge i ln wt diys su oinain Te tep o te tt to state the of attempt The orientation. issue daily’s with line in goes which n cn conclude can one

coverage and the type of type the and coverage

of of Namely, . Blic in articles in

of the most educated part of Serbian population. population. Serbian of part educated most the of

ifications for ifications and and that Serbian society has deeply embedded patriarchal norms and that that and norms patriarchal embedded deeply has society Serbian that hs logic this Kurir .

justificationa What are the reasons? One possible explanation could be that be could explanation possible One reasons? the are What

ht Serbia that

is preserving is

f akt ead wtot oil responsibility social without demands market of and categorization of perpetrators of perpetrators of categorization and ,

with violence being tolerated and widely dispersed widely and tolerated being violence with

frames ad dniiainl frames identificational and l n

62 newspapers the

used

“status quo” and contributes to the widely the to contributes and quo” “status . Politika hy rfr estoait coverage sensationalist prefer they

write , on the one side, h side, one the on ,

n accordance in Blic hw some shown

ae o changed not have domestic violence domestic

and

of the traditional the of due to due al problem. Kurir with as a stable a as

the

positive , on the the on ,

market market of of soci

the the

in al al .

CEU eTD Collection has topass. for hence women, extent large a Se violence, domestic of problem social the to regards with stand clear adjust who boards embed dedness dedness

hrceie b ptirhl om and norms patriarchal by characterized f patriarchal of

a newspapers content to content newspapers

major major improvement om i Srin society Serbian in norms

of the

media portrayal of domestic violence more time time more violence domestic of portrayal media 63 readership tastes. readership

wih n turn, in which , unequal relations between men and and men between relations unequal

Although the state showed a showed state the Although rbian society is still to still is society rbian

affect te editorial the s CEU eTD Collection 8 (a

The list of articles is list articles of The ) Blic 2. 1. 31. 30. 29. 28. 27. 26. 25. 24. 23. 22. 21. 20. 19. 18. 17. 16. 15. 14. 13. 12. 11. 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3.

March 14,2006, March 18,2006, March 20,2006, March 24,2006, March 24,2006, Febru PROSTITUCIJU February 1,2006, February 2,2006, February 13,2006, February 16,2006, February 20,2006, February 24,2006, February 7,2006, February 10,2006, February 27,2006, February 28,2006, January 5,2006, January 5,2006, January 5,2006, LJUBAVNICU Jan SPAVANJU January 9,2006, JETRU POCEPAO January 11,2006, DEVOJČICA January 23,2006, January 18,2006, January 19,2006, NEVENČANU SUPRUGU January 21,2006, January 22,2006, January 23,2006. January 24,2006. SLOVENIJI January 27,2006. January 27,2006.

The list of of list The n uary 6,2006, ary 1,2006,

provided .

ewspaper articles analyzed

Preneto, SILOVANA DEVOJČICA Preneto, Preneto, UBISTVA POKUŠAJ M.P., Sasa Trifunovic, Preneto, H.D., UBICA OCA I MAJKE NA H.D.,I POSMATRANJU UBICA OCA Preneto, MAJKE U VRAT UBO SUPRUGU I PUCAOUTAŠTUŽENU, PA PRESUDIO Miric, S. SEBI MUČILI, GODINAMAZ.Adzic, JE UBIŠE Ana SAD MI SU JE Baco Cetkovic, I.I., POKUŠAO DA UBIJE

N. Radisic, OD TRIN. Radisic, ŽENE DVE SILOVANE PREMINULE Prelic, Milan Preneto, A.A., M.P., iD.Milosevic, D. Markovic N. Golosin, D. Markovic, V. Trtovic, M. Prelic, J. Ilic, OTAC TERAOMALOLETNEJ. ĆERKENA OCUPODVODAČU ODUZIMAJU DECUT. Spajic, I.I., PIŠTOLJEM UBIO ŽENU I UBIOI.I., ŽENU PIŠTOLJEM SEBE B. Janackovic,

S.D., SINI S.D., UBILI SNAHA STARICU in Serbian since the articles where analyzed in analyzed where articles the insince Serbian

N.B.J., NASILJEU PORODICI N.B.J., POKUŠAOMAJKU DA SILUJE M.G., IZ DEVOJKU T.M.S., SUPRUZIBOMBOMD.M., PRETIO UBICIS.B.ZATVORA 14GODINA SUPRUGE MALOTNICIH.D., DEVOJČICU SILOVALI

“ADILABILANIJENARKOMANKA“ UBIOŽENU SEKIROM RANIO SUPRUGU PRESUDA ZAPRESUDA ZLOSTAVLJANJE PETOGODIŠNJIH ,

OPTUŽENI KAJE SE „JANA BILAZAKOPAO“„JANA KADŽIVA JE SAM IŽENE SILUJU DEVOJČICI NOGOM NA STAO BRAK JE ODVEO U ODVEO BRAK SMRT JE Appendix OTAC RUKAMA ZADAVIOOTAC ĆERKU RUKAMA NA ZLOČIN U UALEKSINCU, SUĐENJE SKALPELOM POKUŠAO DABIVŠUSKALPELOM UBIJE 64

LJUBOMORE TUKAOŽARAČEM

from NEVENČANU ŽENU NEVENČANU

ŽANDARMI ZAKOPAO UBIO

Blic .

, Kurir

the the

original language original

and

LEĐAI Politika

8 .

CEU eTD Collection

40. 39. 38. 37. 36. 35. 34. 33. 32. 67. 66. 65. 64. 63. 62. 61. 60. 59. 58. 57. 56. 55. 54. 53. 52. 51. 50. 49. 48. 47. 46. 45. 44. 43. 42. 41.

February 2,2013, MRTVE DEVOJKE PROVEO PORED February 13,2013, February 17,2013, ISPIJAJUĆI VISKI February 18,2013, BOL, PLAKATI NEMOJ February 20,2013, February 21,2013, February 22,2013, February 27,2013, MU ČINI January 3,2013, NAPRAVE SARMU January 4,2013, January 10,2013, DEVOJKU January 10,2013, January 11,2013, January 12,2013, January 13,2013, January 15,2013, January 16,2013, January 2 January 23,2013, SAMOUBISTVO January 29,2013, January 30,2013, OPETZAPOSLIOJE January 31,2013, January 31,2013, January 3,2013, January 4,2013, January 10,2013, DEVOJKU January 10,2013, MALOMANĐELU January 11,2013, ROĐENDAN January 12,2013 January 15,2013, March 28,2006, ANU MAJKU NJENU March 29,2006, March 30,2006, GRADU March 5,2006, LJUBAVNICUI SEBE March 10,2006, March 13,2006,

2, 2013,

, ,

H.D., ISKASAPLJENA H.D., P. Vujanac I NAPUSTIO VujanacAdzic, P. I A.Z.ŽENU UBIO DECU, PA V. Maric V. Maric GARAŽI SILOVANA JAVNOJ DEVOJKA E.B., U OD SILOVATELJA TRAGA NI Milenkovic, DEVOJČICU NA SAHRANJUJU Slavisa ZA SUĐENJE KATARINETROGODIŠNJE UBISTVON.J., MALE ZA SMRT N.J., OPTUŽUJE KATARINE, MALIŠA ĆERKU“ „MALIŠASILOVAOMOJU N.J., JE B.C.,ŽENE ZA PRESUDA TRUDNEUBISTVO Boris Vukovic

N.B., MASAKRIRAO MAJKU IMASAKRIRAO SEBIN.B., PRESUDIO MAJKU Suzana Bozinovic, PASILOVAO DROGIRAO, NEPOKRETNU ZA OSUMNJIČEN Petkovic, KORENRadoslav NASILJA Ivanoska, R. BRAČNA OKONČANA SVAĐA SMRĆU RAZBIJAOIN.K.,KUĆU MAJCI PRETIO NOŽEM T.M.S. Maric Vesna KRIVIČNASUPRUZI PRIJAVAT.M.S., UBICI IUBIJENE ĆERKA MAJKA S.M., ŠESTOGODIŠNJA Suzana Bozinovic, PASILOVAO DROGIRAO, NEPOKRETN NA Milenkovic,MAJKA SAMRTI: VODU MOM Slavisa DAJTE M. Task DEVOJKE SNIMAOIHSILUJE DOKDEVOJKE LJ.P ZLOSTAVLJAO MALOLETNUI.P. SEKSUALNO ROĐAKU II.P.,ŽENU ĆERKU NAPAO Vukovic,Boris POKUŠALA UBILA NA MUŽA SPAVANJU, Tamara M. Subota M.Subota Tamara Lalic Ana UZ TOŠETA SAHRANJENA PROESKOGD.M., PESMU Miletic, UBICA NIJE SASLUŠAN MANEKENKEDusan JOŠ PANČEVAC OSUĐEN Bori B.V.

Z.B., OTERAO SUPRUGU IZ.B., STAN DETE OTERAO PARAZLUPAO SUPRUGU

s Vukovic, STELA NIJEZASLUŽILAs UBIJEM DA JE - V.V., PROVEO NOĆ PORED UBIJENE DEVOJKE V.V., PROVEO UBIJENE NOĆ PORED DEVOJKE -

B.V.,ŽENA

ovic, Brajkovic - Dusan Miletic, PORUKA UBICE:DusanOSETIŠ Miletic, PORUKA KADA - Brajkovic, TRUDNICU OSTAVIO BEZ PA POSLA ZAKLAO DEVOJKU ZBOGLJUBOMOREZAKLAO DEVOJKU Ana Z.AnaUBIO BACALA MAJKU, SEKIROM Adzic, - L. Gedosevic, MLADE ŽENE NE ZNAJU DAL. ŽENEZNAJU MLADENE Gedosevic,

65 NASILJE UPORODICI NASILJE - – UBICA ZARILAUBICA SEBI USTOMAK NOŽ

TELA OCA I TELA OCA RAZBACAO PO MAJKE

Nebojsa Radisic,Nebojsa UBICANOĆ CELU

CEU eTD Collection (b) Kurir 78. 77. 76. 75. 74. 73. 72. 71. 70. 69. 68. 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 97. 96. 95. 94. 93. 92. 91. 90. 89. 88. 87. 86. 85. 84. 83. 82. 81. 80. 79.

January 30,2006, January 5,2006, January 5,2006, January 10,2006, January 12,2006, January 18,2006, January 21,2006, January 23,2006, January 27,2006, January 27,2013, March 13,2013, NASILJA March 16,2013, March 11,2013, March 23,2013, March 24,2013, PODVODILI March 26,2013, SLOBODI March 26,2013, March 26,2013, March 27,2013, March 2,2013, March 5,2013, March 5,2013, March 2013, March 29,2013, PORODICI February 25,2013, February 21,2013, February 7,2013, February 8,2013, February 8,2013, February 10,2013, February 15,201 February 15,2013, February 19,2013, POZVAO ADVOKATA February 19,2013, February February 22,2013, February 25, February 25,2013, February 27,2013, OMETENU U RAZVOJU February 1,2013,

22, 2013,

Boris Vukovic, ZATVOR ZABoris ZATVOR Vukovic, SILEDŽIJE KUĆNE LJ. Mitic, DEVOJCI ISTALJ.DEVOJCI Mitic, KAZNA

UBICA DEVOJKE PREBAČEN UUBICA ĆELIJU IZLAZAKIZI ZATVORA SLAVIO DEMOLIRAOKUĆU Z.P., STARICU DA SILUJE POKUŠAO K.K., ZAUSTAVITI NASILJEZAUSTAVITIK.K., Surla,ŽRTVE OSNOVALIFOND ZA Slavko PORODIČNOG LJU M.J., NASILJE Stefanovic,ŽENAMASvetlana NAD EKONOMSKO TINEJDŽERKUIvanovic, DANA SILOMM. MESEC Anicic,Sladjana NIJEDANŽIVI SILOVATELJ NEDA SME NA KOGA Colic, Ć Nedeljko ZBOG UBIOMLEKA N.K., SUPRUGU 3, Preneto, UHAPŠEN ZBOG POKUŠAJA UBISTVA UHAPŠEN ZBOGPreneto, POKUŠAJA UNOVOGODIŠNJOJ NOĆI DEVOJČICAPreneto, SILOVANA Biljana Vuckovic, ZBOG SRAMA NEĆEBiljanaZBOGNASILJEVuckovic, DA PRIJAVE SRAMA AMNESTIRANIB.J., OSUĐENIKNAPAO STARICU Slavisa Milenkovic,DVEZLOSTAVLJALI GODINEDEVSlavisa S.M., SILOVANA UČENICS.M., ZBOGUHAPŠENIOBLJUBEMALOLETNICE PRIJAVE ZBOGZLOUPOTREBEM.DJ., MALOLETNICA Preneto, PORAST NASILJA PORAST PORODICI U Preneto, BLUDNIČIO DEVOJČICOMA.R., NAD SILOVAOD.K., DEVOJČICE TRIZAIV.N., SILOVANJA POKUŠAJ GODINE PO SAHRANA UMESTO VENČANJA M.S.Milisic, MALOL SILOVAO Z.M.,UBIOZAKOPAO PA I.C., UBICA SEKAJE NEMA DOVOLJNO ŽENA DOVOLJNO INEMA NOVAC SU GDE MOĆ SILOVAOS.B., MALOLETNICU S.P.S., UAPATINUZABELEŽENS.P.S., U NASILJA PORAST BIVŠIM.I., UBIO SUPRUGU POLICAJAC „MILIJARDAUSTAJE PROTIVDJ.B., NASILJA” LAKŠE DO POSLA MAJKE SAMOHRANE KUHINJSKIMN. Kolundzija, NOŽEMŽENU, UBIO PA BOLJA ZAŽRTVEPOTREBNA POMOĆ NASILJA OSUĐENIPOVREDIOA.DJ., NASILNIKNEVENČAN ŽENU BiljanaBIVŠI Vuckovic, ZLOSTAVLJAO MUŽ ME ĆUTIB.K.MAJKA SINA JEDNOMESEČNOG OUBISTVU

BOMORNI ŽENU, MUŽ UBIO SEBE PA

66 ETNICU

E GRISTI SAVEST

A SEDMOG RAZREDA A

ZATVORA ZAZATVORAZLOČIN

OJKU OJKU

CEU eTD Collection

23. 22. 21. 20. 19. 18. 17. 16. 15. 14. 13. 12. 11. 60. 59. 58. 57. 56. 55. 54. 53. 52. 51. 50. 49. 48. 47. 46. 45. 44. 43. 42. 41. 40. 39. 38. 37. 36. 35. 34. 33. 32. 31. 30. 29. 28. 27. 26. 25. 24.

March 27,2006, March 28,2006, March 29,2006, March 29,2006, March 30,2006, March 1,2006, March 1,2006, March 2,2006, March 5,2006, March 6,2006, March 7,2006, March 7,2006, March 8,2006, March 10,2006, March 11,2006, March 14,2006, March 24,2006, March 24,2006, March 31,2006, February 1,2006, February 8,2006, February 10,2006, February 14,2006, February 18,2006, February 22,2006, February 28,2006, February 2,2006, February 4,2006, February 5,2006, February 6,2006, February 8,2006, February 23,2006, February 23, January 5,2006, January 6,2006, January 6,2006, January 6,2006, January 9,2006, January 11, Janaury 14,2006, January 17,2006, January 17,2006, January 18,2006, Ja Janaury 21,2006, January 23,2006, January 23,2006, January 27,2006, January 28,2006, January 30,2006, nuary 18,2006, 2006,

2006, A.L., POMRAČENI UM UBICAZLOČINAA.L., SENESEĆA M.S., UBIO PRIJATELJICU I PRIJATELJICU UBIO M.S., NA OSUĐEN 12GODINA A.L., K.K., KASAPINLalic,A. MOŽDANEURAČUNLJIV UBISTVOV.K., SPREDUMIŠLJAJEM Z.S.,ZA GODINA DEVET TETKE UBISTVO Preneto, SEDAMGODINA ZAZATVORA UBISTVOPreneto, OCA BRANILANOŽEM ČAST V.K., UBIJENAZBOG DECEP.R., MALOLETNEZA OSUĐEN SILOVANJE DEVOJKE Preneto, LJUBAUBIO SNAHINOGV.K., P.R. ISEKAOLJUBAVNICUPOLICAJAC BIVŠU MANIJAKDEVER V.K., ZADAVIO V. Konjevic, ĆERKU Preneto, POČINJE SUĐENJE MALIŠI POČINJE SUĐENJE Preneto, JEFTOVIĆU ZLOSTAPreneto, B.O. I.C.,DETE UBILI I.Cvetkovic, MALIŠAMONSTRUM NISAM I. UBICA ANA JE Cvetkovic, I. MALIŠA MONSTRUM Cvetkovic, P.R., RANIO ŠURAKA ZBOG SUMNJE U ŽENU RANIOZBOG SUMNJE P.R., ŠURAKA PRETUKAO BABUD.N., ROĐENUSILOVAO MAJKU PROTIV Preneto, MALIŠA KLUPI NA OPTUŽENIČKOJ Preneto, NOŽEMA.DJ., NA DRUGA VANBRAČNOG MONSTRUM D.N., IMAO MALIŠAD. Novkovic, SAUČESNIKA NEGIRAZLOČIND.N., ŽRTVEUMRLESILOVANJA O.J., POSLE ĆERKIV.K., METALNOM KIČMU POLOMIO ŠIPKOM OVERILALIFTUP.R., U DEDAA.G., OBLJUBIO UNUKU UMRLA DOZEP.R., PREKOMERNE OD P.R. I.C., OCA PLAŠIMSE Z.G.,UBIOŽENU PASEBE I.C., UBISTVO SVIREPO Z.R.D., TUKAO HRASTOVOMBABUI MOTKOM ĆERKU Preneto, ĆERKE NAVODIO ĆERKE NA PROSTITUCIJUPreneto, ZA OSUĐEN D.K., SILOVANJE MALOLETNICU DA POKUŠAO SILUJE Preneto, ZBOG POKUŠAO DAUJAKA LJUBOMORED.N., UBIJE ZADAVIOIOTIŠAO Preneto, U MAJKU DOM ŽENI BIVŠOJ NOŽZARIO Preneto, USRCE Z.G.,BAKUDO SMRTI TUKAO

OSTAO BEZ MUŠKOSTI SILOVAO ON NJU ILI NJU NJEGA? ONONA SILOVAO – – –

D.M., SEKIROMGLAVU U J.S., U SMRT ZBOG USMRT LJUB J.S.,

I.C.,ZLOČIN PRIKRIVALA NASILJA U PORODICI VLJAO SINA

VNIKA

AVI

DEVOJČICA

CEU eTD Collection

70. 69. 68. 67. 66. 65. 64. 63. 62. 61. 99. 98. 97. 96. 95. 94. 93. 92. 91. 90. 89. 88. 87. 86. 85. 84. 83. 82. 81. 80. 79. 78. 77. 76. 75. 74. 73. 72. 71.

STUDENJAKU! February 15,2013, February 17,2013, February 18,2013, R February 25,2013, January 3,2013, January 4,2013, January 10,2013, PREREZAO VRATU DVORISTU January 10,2013, January 10,2013, January 12,2013, LANCEM ZASTOKU! January 14,2013, January 15,2013, MALOLETNU ROĐAKU January 16,2013, January 17,2013, January 18,2013, January 22 DROGOM! January 24,2013, January 25,2013, STOJIŠ?! January 28,2013, January January 31,2013, January 31,2013, January 3,2013, January 4,2013, January 5,2013, January 6,2013, January 8,2013, January 10,2013, January 12,2013, SE January 15,2013, January 16,2013, STARICU?! January 18,2013, SILOVAO! Janaury 19,2013, ROBIJA! January 20,2013, January 24,2013, January 24,20 Janaury 26,2013, March 18,2006, March 25,2006, OBIJAŠ PROSTITUIŠE 29, 2013,

, 2013,

, UBIJE DANOŽEM K.K., POKUŠAO KĆERKU E.K., SILOVAO DEVOJKU NA JAVNOM PARKINGU JAVNOM NA E.K., DEVOJKU SILOVAO KAZNAZA MANIJAKA Jelena Spasic, Ku Ekipa SILOVATELJIZN.A.S, POLICIJI? POZNAT GARAŽE MANIJAKA? NAŠLA M.D., POLICIJA DNK Ekipa Kurira, MAJKU BRUTALNOKurira, USMRTIO MAJKU SEKIROM! Ekipa ŽIVEO SDEVOJČICOMS.U., Z.G., HTEO DA JE ZAKOLJEZ.G., DAHTEO JE Marija Velickovic,LJUBAVNICU UBIO ONGODINA JE Marija 16 OD NE POMAŽEE.K.,NI DNK! Kurira,ZBOGEkipa Milan Dudvarski,DEVOJKUI OMAMIOSILOVAO BOLESNU Milan TUKAO SUPRUGU S.U., I VEZAO ZAKurira,ŽENU Ekipa JE PREBIO ORMAR ZASŽENU, UBIO PA S.S., M.Velickovic PIJAN TUKAOE.K., OCA Ivanov, DEVOJČICA MANIJAK PIPKAO ŠEST Marija MAJCI S.U., PRETIO NOŽEM IIH TERAONA SESTRE SEKS PLAĆAO Sasa Popovic, I MAJKU TUKAO SESTRU ZNALA Tadic,ZATRUDNIŠ SIDA Dijana ANE MOŽEŠ Kurira,BUŠILICOMEkipa PROBUŠILA MUŽU GLAVU? ZAŠTITITI DRŽAVA ĆE D.Tadic, TRUDNICE! ĆUTIO UBISTVUM.D., LJUBAVNICU ĆERKICU!UBIOI NJENU NIJE Velickovic,ZAKLAO JER HTELA DEVOJKU Marija DA Kurira,EkipaDEVOJKU NA UBIO SPAVANJU! Rafailovic,Becic, AleksandarJelena MALOLETNIK SILOVAO Ivanov, VOLELA Marija Velickovic,ZA SAMO DOŽIVOTNA MANIJAKE Marija S.U., TRUDNICE NISU S.U., POŽELJNE S.Stojanovic Z.N.,UBICA POKAJAO! SE DETETA NIJE

Ekipa Kurira, DOK GAEkipa U SU HAPSILI UBICA PLAKAO Dudvarski, POKUŠAO DA UBICA SEUBIJE DEVOJKE Milan POSTOJIDAOBOG,ZAVRŠI!BRZO DA MU J.S., NIJE M.Ivanov

rira, ALI VRIŠTALA MENIJE NIKO SAM, ČUO

–

– N.Stojanovic, SILOVATELJIZBIVŠI GARAŽE –

T.Rakocevic, MAJKU ISKASAPIO, T.Rakocevic, MAJKU PA

M.Ivanov, SILOVAO MESECIMA

68 LJUBOMORE RAZNEOI SEBEŽENU

SAM GASAM KAOME A ON SINA,

PAO

SEBI

CEU eTD Collection

110. 109. 108. 107. 106. 105. 104. 103. 102. 101. 100. 137. 136. 135. 134. 133. 132. 131. 130. 129. 128. 127. 126. 125. 124. 123. 122. 121. 120. 119. 118. 117. 116. 115. 114. 113. 112. 111. MONSTRUM ERA! HTELE NJIM? S SEKS PODRUMU? POMENASLIKANJE DOČEKATI SUTRA BABU ORALNI SEKS! GODINE KOLIMA! VAŽNO GODINE DRUGU

March 20,2013, March 23,2013, March 23,2013, March 23,2013, March 26,2013, March 28,2013, March 31,2013, March 31,2013, March 2,2013, March 5,2013, March 6,2013, March 8,2013, March 13,2013, March 16,2013, March 16,2013, March 172013, March 21,2013, March 27,2013, March 29,2013, March 31,2013, February 1,2013, February 7,2013, February 8,2013, February 10,2103, February 10,2013, February 15,2013, February 15,2013, Feb February 19,2013, February 22,2013, February 23,2013, February 25,2013, February 26,2013, February 26,2013, February 1,2013, February 2,2013, February 9,2013, February 14,2013,

ruary 15,2013,

Ekipa Kurira, HTEO DA ZAKOLJE DEVOJKE NISUZAKOLJE JER DAKurira, HTEO Ekipa IZMISLILADEVOJČICASILOVANJE U E.K., I SVEDOČI SEKSOLOG?J.S., Z

Dejanovic Marija

Miljana Vojvodic, OVO JE Vojvodic, OVOMiljana JE A.D. ŽENU UBIOBRAKA!S.U., 65 GODINA POSLE I TERAO ĆERKU S.S., PROSE ŽENU DA SVOG OČUHA! UBIO MAJKU SVAĐEM.V., POSLE OPTUŽNICAZA MANEKENKE UBISTVO S.S., ZA PRESTAJE! M.D., TUGA SINOM NE SUDANASKSENIJU MNOGIZABORAVILI ZBOG UBIOMLEKA?S.U., STARICU POKUŠAOPA UBISTVO, DA ODROBIJAO SILUJE D.I., SVOG MAJKU S.S., Z.N., NASRNUO NAZ.N., SUPRUGU NASRNUO Zorica SEZAKLAO!Nikolic, UBIOŽENU, PA Radanov,Ljubomir NEĆU UPOMOĆ, Z.N.,APEL PRETUČENEDEVOJKE: BOG MOMKA IZMISLILA DA JE BILAIZMISLILABOG JE DA MOMKA SILOVANA! Dragan Ilic, SILOVALIDragan BOLESNUDEVOJKU DVE PRITVORILIS.S., MANIJAKA! UBIOBABUZATOA.D., ŠTOMEVARALA! SAM Dragan Ilic, SILOVALIDragan BOLESNUDEVOJKU DVE Kurira,Ekipa NE BOLJE,Dudvarski, MI JEDINO ĆERKA Milan JE TO JE Ekipa Kurira,Z Ekipa E.K., POSLEE.K., SVAĐE ZAGODINAUBISTVOE.K., OCA 13 ZAUBISTVO 12GODINAE.K., MAJKE ZATVORA NASILJA MUZEJ HTEO Videnovic,DA JE NAĐ MEUBIJE! Milena I ŽENUZLOSTAVLJAO S.U., SINA ZAPALIO SVAĐE E.K., SINA POSLE SLOMIOOCU REBRA S.U., Zorica UBIO Nikolic, BIVŠI POLICAJAC SUPRUGU! ŽENE NAPRAVILE MREŽU SVOJU TRUDNICAJEDNA B.V., JOŠ DOBILA OTKAZ –

Z.N., DETE TERALI NA PROSTITUCIJU!Z.N.,DETENA TERALI 69

, KSENIJINA MAJKA ZABRANILAMAJKA , KSENIJINA ADAVIO DEVOJKU, PA TO PA JAVIO DEVOJKU, ADAVIO VINUDEVOJČICU SILOVAO U PA VI GLASAJTE ZA VIPA ERU GLASAJTE

PRIJATELJA NA NATERAO TUKAO SUPRUGU TUKAO DETE KOJE DETE ZAVEO KOJE JE

CEU eTD Collection (c) Politika 2. 1. 141. 140. 139. 138. 39. 38. 37. 36. 35. 34. 33. 32. 31. 30. 29. 28. 27. 26. 25. 24. 23. 22. 21. 20. 19. 18. 17. 16. 15. 14. 13. 12. 11. 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3.

March 4,2006, March 7,2006, March 8,2006, March 14,200 March 17,2006, March 23,2006, March 25,2006, March 26,2006, March 28,2006, March 29,2006, March 30,2006, March 31,2006, March 3,2006, March 5,2006, March 7,2006, March 10,2006, February 8,2006, February 18,2006, February 20,2006, February 22,2006, February 23,2006, February 23,2006, Feb February 28,2006, February 9,2006, February 20,2006, January 26,2006, January 5,2 January 9,2006, January 12,2006, January 13,2006, Janaury 14,2006, January 17,2006, January 24,2006, January 27,2006, January 27,2006, January 28,2006, January 21,2006, January 23,2006, NA POSLU! STRAVIČNU TRAUMU RETARDIRANOM“ PEKARU

ruary 28,2006,

March 3,2013, March 8,2013, March 8,2013, March 20,2013, 006,

6, M.Z., SILOVAO IKRAO M.Z., SILOVAO I UHAPŠENLaketic, UBICA OCA M. ZA SILOVANJA M.Z., OSUMNJIČEN O. Milosevic, NASILJE JE MUŠKOG NASILJE RODA... JE O. Milosevic, MAĆEHA BIJEV. Jovic, USIJANIMŽARAČEM BUDE DA SVAKIJelena Rankovic, PRAZNIK DAN D.J., NAŽRTVAMA USLUZID.J., NASILJA U PORODICI ŽENU NAPAO SEKIROM M. Derikonjic, ZADAVIO OTACN. Djuric, ĆERKU N.R., DOK NASILJEN.R., DOK NE PRESTANE PRAVOM PRED JEDNAKE A.Cveticanin, TIŠINI Vukosavljevic,ZLODanijela U PORODICE I ZLOSTAVLJAO SUPRUGU G.O., DECU Cveticanin,ZA MILIONA POLA DISKRIMINACIJUAndrijana MALIŠI POČINJE SUĐENJE Preneto, NISAM MAJKA UBICAM. Derikonjic, JE KRIV, ĆERKU JE MI M.D., SILOVAO B.N., SEBE UBIOPA DEVOJKU, K. Djordjevic, DEVOJČICE ČEŠĆE ŽRTVE DEVOJČICEK. Djordjevic, NASILJA ČEŠĆE ZADESET GODINA LJUBAVNIKA UBISTVOM.M., Basovic, KRIVIGordana I ALKOHOL SU STRES Bogdanovic, TIHAS. DISKRIMINACIJA KAKOISPITIVATIA. Petrovic, ZLOSTAVLJANO DETE RADE SEDAM DANAUNEDELJI K.DJ., Z DESETGODINA Preneto, ZATVORAZA OSAMGODINA T. Todorovic, NAPASNIKA OPTUŽUJEJOVANA OCA M.D., MAJKE OSAM GODINAZA SILOVANJE M.L., ŽENU UBIO U GROBU G. Otasevic, B.N.,SILOVAO MALOLETNICU ILomovic,B.ZAKOPAO UBIO SUPRUGU M. Cekerevac, ŽENAMA NIGDE NIJE LAKO NIJEŽENAMA NIGDE M. Cekerevac, MANIJAKUT.T., ZATVORA 15GODINA ŽRTAVA MEĐUNARODNI DAN Preneto, IZJEDNAČENI ZAKONSKIM. Cekerevac, NAJVIŠEK. Djordjevic, U NASILJA PORODICI LJUBIO UČENICUM.L., SILOVAOZADAVIO STARICU S.Z., PA Z.S., UBIOZ.S., SINA M.V., MAJKA ŽRTVE: MOJE DETE JE PREŽIVELO ŽRTVE: DETE JE MOJE M.V., MAJKA Sanja Ilic, SVAKU SKORO Sanja PORODILJUZLOSTAVLJAJU Dijana Tadic, MUŠKARČINE 21. VEKA MUŠKARČINE Tadic, 21. Dijana S.ILIC

–

S.Popovic, NUDIS.Popovic, „BLAGO POSAO

ATVORA ZA UNUKE OBLJUBUATVORA

MAJKE

JEVTOVIĆU

CEU eTD Collection

51. 50. 49. 48. 47. 46. 45. 44. 43. 42. 41. 40. 77. 76. 75. 74. 73. 72. 71. 70. 69. 68. 67. 66. 65. 64. 63. 62. 61. 60. 59. 58. 57. 56. 55. 54. 53. 52.

March 15,2013, March 31 PEDOFILIMA OSUĐENIH JAVNI SILOVATELJA REGISTA February 4,2013, February 8,2013, VANBRAČNO February 11,2013, OTKAZOM February 12,2013, OTKAZIMIDALJE PRETI February 13,2013, February 13,2013, February 15,2013, IZ RBV February 18,2013, February 17,2013, February 22,2013, February 25,2013, February 25,2013, February 26,2013, POČETKA 2013. February 27, February 28,2013, February 2,2013, DEVOJKE February 3,2013, MEDAKOVIĆ February 14,2013, February 15,2013, February 17,2013, GAZDUIONESVEŠĆENU GAZDARICU January 29,2013, January 3,2013, January 5,2013, January 10,2013, PORODICI January 10,2013, January 11,2013, January 15,2013, January 15,2013, January 26,2013, January 3,2013, January 28,2013, March 1,2006, March 15,2006, March 1,2006, March 2,2006, March 3,2006,

, 2013,

2013,

PROCES PREDUGO TRAJE PROCES Lucic, MIRNOPROBLEMA J. REŠAVANJE ZAŽRTVEM.M., UTOČIŠTE NASILJA ČIME UDARAJU I STIGNUNED. Davidov, G K. Djordjevic, SVAKA TREĆA ŽRTVA SVAKA TREĆA K. Djordjevic, D.A., SIN UBIOUKALUĐERICI D.A., MAJKU SIN ZA „MARIJINZAKON” M.M., PLAKATIMA BEOGRADA SILOVANA U CENTRU DEVOJKA J.S., UBICILJUBAVNICEJ.S., ČETIRI ROBIJE DECENIJE ZAOSUMNJIČEN SILOVANJE

R.S., PRITVORENI ZBOG PRITVORENIR.S., OSOBE OBLJUBE NEMOĆNE ZBOGZATVORA DVE GODINER.S., OBLJUBE NEMOĆNE N.M. IZVRŠIO UBIO PA MAJKU, J.S., SAMOUBISTVO PRAZNICI „OKIDAČ”K. Djordjevic, ZA KAO U NASILJE UBIOM.M., D.A., OSUMNJIČEN SUPRUGE ZA R.H., UBISTVO PODVODILI MALOLETNICEO. Milosevic, Vukosavljevic,SPREČITI KAKO Danijela Aleksandra Petrovic, POVERENIKEZAAleksandra UVESTI KONTROLU PODVODAČIMAZATVORA VEKA R.H., POLA

Kata V. Arandjelovic, TRUDNICEZAŠTIĆENA ALI KATEGORIJA, V. Arandjelovic, Ivanovic, OTKAZZA TRUDNICEDejana GLAS PROTIVD.A,ZLOSTAVLJA OMBUDSMAN PONUDIOV.M.A., POMOĆTRUDNICAMA DOVOLJNO ŽENEPETRUŠIĆ: NEMAJU I Gucijan,Sandra DISKRIMINISANE NEVIDLJIVE ZA TERAPIJAPORODIČNEK. Djordjevic, NASILNIKE ŽRTAVA ČAK NASILJAK. Djordjevic, 13 UOD PORODICI Djordjevic,ZANEMARENEKatarina ŽRTVE NASILJA D.A. ZA POKUŠAOOSUMNJIČENI UBISTVO SAMOUBISTVO L.P., DECA IZDECAL.P., IGRAČKE DOBILA SIGURNE I KUĆE ODEĆU B.V., UHAPŠEN OSUMNJIČENIZA DEVOJKE UBISTVO DVOGODIŠNJA DEVOJČICA PRONAĐENA DEVOJČICA DVOGODIŠNJA MRTVA – rina Djordjevic,rina DECE ČETVRTINA ROĐENA USRBIJI UBIJENA RESNIKU DEVOJKA U –

D.J.S., BEBISITERKAMRTVOGD.J.S., U STANU PRONAŠLA

B.V

., ZADAVLJENA DEVOJKA., UNASELJU OCA KAMENOM

TRUDNICE ITRUDNICE RBV PORODILJE PRED 71

R BIOR BI SVIM PRETNJA

NJA ŽENA NJA

SILOVATELJE

NOVCA I NOVCA MOĆI

LEDAJU

CEU eTD Collection

86. 85. 84. 83. 82. 81. 80. 79. 78. 92. 91. 90. 89. 88. 87.

March 1,2013, DISKRIMINACIJU March 7,2013, March 7,2013, March 8,2013, March 8,2013, SESTRINS March 9,2013, SPORTU... March 9,2013, March 10,2013, March 10,2013, March 10,2013, March 12,2013, PORODILJE March 14,2013, ŽENU March 27,2013, March 28,2013, INTERVENCIJA March 4,2013,

TVO

Katarina Djordjevic, ŽRTVEDjordjevic,Katarina NASILJA KAOVisnja Arandjelovic,TRUDNOĆA ZA RAZLOG IZLOŽENA SVAKAŽENA DRUGAK.DJ., NASILJU MUŠKARCIK.Djordjevic, POSLU NA POVLAŠĆENI ZABORAVILA GRADSKA VLASTŽENEM. Sasic, NA Markovic,BRATSTVOJEDNAKOST, IPredrag SLOBODA, J. ŽENAIZVRŠNOJ MANJE VLASTI, UK. Djordjevic, POLITICI, B. Vasiljevic, ZBOGB. STOTINU NASILJA OD Vasiljevic, PORODIČNOG VIŠE

K. Djordjevic, BRIGA O DOMAĆINSTVU K. Djordjevic, M. Cekerevac, PODRŠKAPOSLANIKA TRUDNICAMA Katarina Djordjevic, ZAŠTO SMO PUKLI ZAŠTO Djordjevic,Katarina SMO KARLOV Minic, UGAO Dragutin DRUŠTVO NALAZI ZAK.DJ., OPRAVDANJE NASILNIK ŽENE NASILJE TEŠKOPRIJAVLJUJU Dj. Djukic, Bojan Bilbija, BILJIĆ:INSPEKTORIBojanBilbija, ŠTITE TRUDNICEI NE

–

POSAO SAMOZAPOSAO

CEU eTD Collection Russo Felipe Nancy and J. Amy Marin, M Harway, Gallagher, Margaret (1993), M. Robert Entman, Entman K. Elizabeth Carli, Byerly Ca and S. Eve Buzawa, Bullock Clarke Victoria and Virginia Braun, Green Christoffer R., Frank Baumgartner, Vukovic Olivera and Ginic Katarina Marija, Babovic, Aleksić ,

against women” In What cause What In women” against 2014, United States Sage ofInc. America: Publications 20, http://sotomo (4), 43 Communication, April http://jclass.umd.edu/classes/cpsp222/Entman%201991.pdf Accessed and KAL the of narratives DOI: 10.1177/0002764203254616 1601, 46: Scientist, Behavioral American policy, public 403, Mediated R April 20,2014, State Washington in newspapers 77 3:2, psychology, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa#.U5TcRij in research Qualitative PP_Intro.pdf Policy, http://www.unc.edu/~fbaum/books/comp/Comp_Agendas_Files/JEPP_Drafts_web/JE Public perspective, Comparative comparative in setting a_zenama_u_centralnoj_srbiji.pdf http://www.bibija.org.rs/documents/o%20nasilju/mapiranje_porodicnog_nasilja_prem Serbia central the in women against women against MinistryLabor of violence and violence , Jelena , , ,

aoy M 1999. M. Carolyn esponse Cathy Ferrand and Jason Cubert Jason Ferrand and Cathy oet M. Robert ichelle and James O’Neill, ed. 1999. ed. O’Neill, James and ichelle USA: Hampton Press Inc.USA: Hampton Press

and and , women, Representations in popular culture, popular in Representations women, United States of America: Sage Publications, Inc.of America:United StatesSage Publications,

. 2001. .

Jelena (2003).

ve.geo.uzh.ch/sotomo/pps/lit/entman_93.pdf (1991). DOI: 10.1177/0886260502017005001

and Social Policy,and Social Republ l . Buzawa G. rl

Gender Setting Framing: towards clarification of a fracta of clarification Framing:towards

Đorgović. 2011. Đorgović.

“

es otaa o voec aant oe: mlctos for Implications women: against violence of portrayal News es fmns ad h daetc o gne relations gender of dialectics the and feminism News, rmn US cvrg o itrainl es cnrss in contrasts news: international of coverage U.S. Framing

p 51 pp. rn i incidents, air Iran Bibliography

s Men’s violence against women? against violence Men’s s . , Journal ,

. 2003. . .

20) Uig hmtc analys thematic Using (2006), . -

cesd a 1, 2014, 10, May Accessed (2002),

1999. . , 58 - London: Pedersen and Bryan D. D. Bryan and Pedersen

, , Handbook for the media coverage of domestic domestic of coverage media the for Handbook 73

Belgrade: EP pca ise n Agenda on issue Special JEPP cesd pi 2, 04 A 2014. 23, April Accessed

What cause What

, of interpersonal violence, violence, interpersonal of

oetc ilne te rmnl Justice Criminal the Violence, Domestic Coverage of domestic violence fatalities by Coverage violencefatalities by ofdomestic “Feminist perspectives on male violence violence male on perspectives “Feminist Belgrade: ic of Serbia.ic of ZedLtBooks

2010. . ora o Cmuiain 4 (4) 41 Communication, of Journal

- SeCons, SeCons, 101, s m s .

edited by Marian Meyers, 3 Meyers, Marian by edited edr qaiy Directorate, Equality Gender en’s violence against women? against violence en’s

cesd pi 2, 2014 25, April Accessed

apn dmsi violence domestic Mapping

d. . cesd pi 1, 2014, 15, April Accessed cesd pi 2, 2014 22, April Accessed

ured paradigm, ured

vial from: available oe (06, Agenda (2006), Jones

s n psychology, in is edited by Michele Michele by edited 17: 475, 475, 17: vial from: available albe from: vailable - etn in Setting

Jo Accessed wnfM urnal of urnal ” In In ” 83 .

- - , . .

CEU eTD Collection A. Dietram and David Tewksbury, (1979). F. Eugene Shaw, A. Dietram Scheufele, Mike Charlotte, Ryan, Zorica Mršević, 1997. ed. Marian, Meyers, Miller L. Susan and L. Michelle Meloy, and E. Maxwell McCombs, and E. Maxwell McCombs, (2005). E. Maxwell McCombs, KimberlyA, Maxwell, vial from: 2014. 28, April Communication 9 57, Communication, of Journal Accessed models, effects media three of evolution the Gazette,Communication 25: 0as%20effects.pdf http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/ogandy/c45405%20resources/scheufele%20framing%2 available participatory Association, in Communication experiment longitudinal A 10.1177/0886 murders, 2, No. 21 Vol. Violence, Interpersonal of Journal communication, violence domestic analiza from Analysis Inc.Hampton Press by edited media, the and violence Drew 29 Humphries, Women, In violence” gendered of presentation DOI: 176 pp. 2, No. 36, Vol. Quarterly, Opinion Public The http://www4.ncsu.edu/~ 43(2):58 Communication, 543 of Ideas, Journal of Marketplace the Yearsin Five Research: Twenty pp. 6:4, 10.1080/14616700500250438 Studies, April 13,2014.DOI: 10.1177/107769900007700203. news the in violencecaseshapeddomestic Simpsonof reporting O. J. the Howviolence: domestic Inc. and Harway

: 10.1086/267990 - medijskog , United Nations D Nations United , - . 2013. . 7 cesd pi 2, 2014. 20, April Accessed 67

http://www.undp.org/content/serbia/en/home/library/poverty/kvalitativna ei, oraimMs Cmuiain urel, 77:258, Quarterly, Communication Journalism&Mass media, James M. O’Neill, M. James 260505282285

John John -

Media Coverage of Violence against Women in Serbia in Women against Violence of Coverage Media 2007

nsai ad Alfredo and Anastario - , (1999)

izvetavanja

Agenda

- Huxford, 56, 56, - Donald L., Shaw L., Donald . eitd oe, Representations women, Mediated

1.pdf oad . Shaw. L. Donald

amgutsch/MccombsShawnew.pdf A look at agenda setting: past, present and future, Journalism future, and present past, setting: agenda at look A . United States of America: Northeastern UniversityPress.

- rmn a a hoy f ei efcs International effects, media of Theory a as Framing

evelopment Program, evelopment . etn ad as omncto Ter, Internat Theory, Communication Mass and Setting Scheufele. (2007). Scheufele. .

96,

. -

ora o Communication, of Journal Catherine o - 557,

- p 18 nasilju p. 96 - 35, 74 . http://www.unc.edu/~fbaum/teaching/articles/J -

- 105, DOI: 105, DOI: (1972). United States of America: Sage Publications Sage America: of States United

2009. cesd pi 1, 2014 13, April Accessed nad

Borum (1993) auh. (2006). DaCunha. - e

nama

Framing, agenda setting, and priming: and setting, agenda Framing,

Wrs ht on: rn media’s Print wound: that “Words

The Agenda The and .

Accessed April 20, 2014. A 2014. 20, April Accessed 10.1177/001654927902500203 h Eouin f Agenda of Evolution The -

u/ Robert Hornik. Robert

. -

187, .

n oua culture popular in

Accessed April 24, 2014. 24, April Accessed cesd a 3 2014. 3, May Accessed -

etn fMs Media, Mass of Setting hnig oeae of coverage Changing

pp. 209 pp.

(2000). -

Qualitative -

228, DOI: 228, .

Accessed Covering - vailable , Setting Setting

USA: DOI: ional ional . -

20,

- -

CEU eTD Collection ed. Ostojić, Natalija and Jasmina Murić Natalija, Mićunović, of Association Journalists’ the of service press the from Kovac, Katarina with Interview Interview InterviewDjordjevic, with Katarina journalist of Petr Tamara with Interview from: available 18/2005, No. Serbia of Republic the of Gazette Official the Law, Family Ebart, mediaAccessed archive, 2000. April 2 member to Ministers of Committee the of Rec(2002)5 Recommendation Europe, of Council Coun Mala and Laurel S. Weldon, Peter and Stefaan Walgrawe, divisi Nations United i o Europe, of cil oil oiy Rpbi o Serbia, in Women Against Violence of of Elimination Republic Policy, http://www.gendernet.rs/files/dokumenta/Domaci/Na Social equality gender of advancement Serbia, Labour ofSerbia, and Social Policy of Ministry within Directorate EqualityGender the at Project, Violence Based Gender http://www.ombudsman.lls.rs/attachments/Porodicni%20zakon.pdf viol against women Accessed of protection the on states =210 http://www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?CL=ENG&NT from: violence domestic Development, 21:2 of and Gender Journal women, against violence combat to action take governments why change: Theory, Preliminary a Toward Power: Communication, Setting Agenda Political LVAW%20%28final%2011.11.08%29.pdf http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/vaw_legislation_2008/Report%2 vio on with Natasa Stojanovic, with NatasaStojanovic, .

ec aga lence May 20,2014. Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and and women against violence combating and preventing on Convention

on for the advancement of women. (2008). women. of advancement the for on ed.

56: 88 nt oe, Vienna, women, inst

2009. aotd n a 1, 01 Acse My 0 04 Available 2014. 20 May Accessed 2011. 11, May on adopted , :

231 ovic Ranitovic, former coordinator of the Combating Sexual and Sexual Combating the of coordinator former Ranitovic, ovic

- Htun

- a Alt (2006). Aelst. Van 109. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460

247. National Strategy for improvement of women position and and position women of improvement for Strategy National https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=280915 Primary documents Kurir (2013). .

DOI: 10.1080/13552074.2013.802158. , Gender Equality Directorate, Ministry of Labor and and Labor of Ministry Directorate, Equality Gender ,

journalist,

75 2011. eiit oiiain n porsie policy progressive and Mobilisation Feminist , 2014. , 2014.

cesd a 2, 2014. 20, May Accessed Politika .

h Cnigny f h Ms Media’s Mass the of Contingency The ainl taey o Peeto and Prevention for Strategy National http://www.arhiv.rs/ h Fml ad in and Family the , - ne aotd n pi 3. 2002. 30. April on adopted ence,

2466.2006.000

cionalna_strategija_cir.pdf egae aalbe from: available Belgrade,

Good practices in legislation in practices Good 05.x. . .

. niae Partner Intimate

vial from available

0EGMGP .

: CEU eTD Collection of Forms All of Elimination the on Convention Assembly, General Nations, United iciiain gis Wmn 17, vial from: available 1979, Women, Against http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/cedaw.htm Discrimination Policy, Republic ofSerbia. 027/2011, Relationship, Belgrade:

ulse i te fiil aet o te eulc of Republic the of Gazette Official the in published

edr qaiy ietrt, iity f ao ad So and Labor of Ministry Directorate, Equality Gender

eba No. Serbia cial