DOCSLIB.ORG

Network Rail (Huyton) Order

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Network Rail (Huyton) Order Martin Woods Head of the TWA Orders Unit Department for Transport General Counsel's Office Zone 1/14-18 Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Enquiries: 020 7944 2474 Email: [email protected] Eversheds LLP Web Site: www.gov.uk/dft/twa Solicitors and Parliamentary Agents One Wood Street Our ref: TWA/14/APP/02 LONDON Your ref: SLEVIND/292050-000007 EC2V 7WS 17 July 2014 Dear Sirs, TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992: APPLICATION FOR THE PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL (HUYTON) ORDER 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State for Transport to say that consideration has been given to the application made on 18 February 2014 by your client, Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (“Network Rail”), for: (a) the Network Rail (Huyton) Order ("the Order"), to be made under sections 1 and 5 of the Transport and Works Act 1992 ("TWA"); and (b) a direction as to deemed planning permission for the development provided for in the Order, to be given under section 90(2A) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (“the planning direction”). 2. The Order and planning direction would authorise Network Rail to construct and operate a new 230 metre section of railway and associated works at Huyton, east of Liverpool, on the Chat Moss Line railway (“the scheme”). The Order would also authorise the compulsory acquisition of land and rights in land, the use of temporary working sites and access, and the use of streets for the purposes of the scheme. Summary of the Secretary of State’s decision 3. For the reasons given in this letter, the Secretary of State has decided to make the Order, with modifications, and to give the planning direction, subject to the conditions set out in Annex 1 to this letter. The application 4. In making this application, Network Rail has complied with the publicity requirements of the Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) 1 Rules 2006 (“the 2006 Rules”). This included serving copies of the application and the accompanying documents on the persons specified in those Rules and making the documents available for public inspection. As also required by those Rules, Network Rail published notices giving information about the application and how to make representations. 5. On 6 January 2014 the Secretary of State notified Network Rail under rule 7(13) of the 2006 Rules of his screening decision that an environmental impact assessment of the scheme was not required. However, Network Rail submitted with the Order application an Environmental Report providing an overview of the proposed mitigation for each environmental discipline, as set out in its request for a screening decision, and a description of the mechanisms and processes in place to secure the provision of that mitigation. 6. The Secretary of State received three objections, one representation (from Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council (“the Council”)) and one letter of support. Following negotiations with Network Rail, the three objections were withdrawn and one of the former objectors, Merseytravel, said that they now supported the scheme. Similarly, as a result of negotiations, Network Rail and the Council agreed on 11 June 2014 to a revised set of conditions to be attached to the planning direction (see paragraph 12 below). The application is, accordingly, now unopposed. Purposes of the scheme 7. Network Rail explained in the statement of aims submitted with the application that, in conjunction with other works on Network Rail’s operational land, the scheme would increase the number of tracks from two to four in the Huyton and Roby station areas. These works would provide capacity for the operation of additional fast trains between Manchester and Liverpool without impacting on local stopping services and existing freight paths. They would also facilitate an improvement in reliability. The works form part of Network Rail’s “Northern Hub” programme of rail improvements which is designed to cater for forecast growth in rail use in the North of England, and to improve the region’s economic performance and connectivity. Secretary of State’s consideration 8. The Secretary of State has considered the information contained in Network Rail’s application and the responses to it. He is satisfied, firstly, that the scheme and the associated works in the Huyton and Roby station areas would bring significant benefits in terms of improved capacity, reliability and journey times between Liverpool and Manchester, increased revenue, and reductions in crowding on trains and road traffic. He recognises that the scheme will contribute to the overall benefits of the wider Northern Hub programme which is part of the Government’s National Infrastructure Plan and longer-term plans to rebalance the economy and boost growth across the country. He notes in this respect that the Northern Hub is estimated as having the potential to bring £4 billion worth of wider economic benefit to the region and between 20,000 and 30,000 jobs. 9. The Secretary of State is satisfied that the works comprised in the scheme are necessary to enable additional fast services on the Liverpool to Manchester route to overtake the slower existing services. He accepts also that, while the associated works in the vicinity of the scheme can be carried out within Network Rail’s operational land using 2 its existing powers and permitted development rights, the Order is necessary to enable Network Rail to carry out works beyond its current operational boundary. 10. With regard to the impacts of the scheme, the Secretary of State remains of the view given in his screening decision that it would not generate significant adverse environmental effects. He is satisfied further that the measures to manage the residual environmental risk described in Network Rail’s Environmental Report are adequate. 11. The Secretary of State considers that, weighing the need for and benefits of the scheme referred to in paragraphs 8 and 9 above against its limited adverse impacts, there is a compelling case in the public interest for giving Network Rail the compulsory acquisition powers applied for in the Order. He is satisfied that the land and rights sought by Network Rail are required for the satisfactory implementation of the scheme and notes that none of those who have interests in the affected land have maintained an objection. He notes also that the scheme is fully funded within Network Rail’s Control Period 5 2014 to 2019 (with some works funded in the earlier Control Period 4) and that there is unlikely to be any financial impediment to implementing the scheme. The Secretary of State is therefore satisfied that the tests in ODPM Circular 06/2004 for giving compulsory acquisition powers have been met. 12. In relation to the planning direction, the Secretary of State considers that the scheme is consistent with the aims of the National Planning Policy Framework1 (“NPPF”) as regards promoting sustainable transport. He is satisfied also that the revised conditions agreed between Network Rail and the Council meet the tests in paragraph 206 of the NPPF. He has, however, made a few drafting changes in the interests of clarity which do not alter the effect of the conditions. With regard to the exclusion of the “preliminary works” from the requirement for the Council’s prior approval of the landscaping scheme, the Construction Environment Management Plan and the tree mitigation plan, he is satisfied that in the particular circumstances of the scheme and its limited environmental impacts this provision is acceptable. The conditions the Secretary of State intends to attach to the planning direction, when given, are set out at Annex 1. Overall conclusions and decision 13. The Secretary of State is satisfied that the substantial benefits of the scheme in terms of public transport improvements and its contribution to economic development would clearly outweigh the limited adverse impacts of the scheme with the proposed mitigation in place. Taking into account all other matters referred to in this letter, he is satisfied that there is a compelling case in the public interest for authorising the scheme. He has therefore decided to make the Order with modifications, and to give the planning direction subject to the conditions set out in Annex 1 to this letter. 14. The Secretary of State has decided to make some minor drafting modifications to the Order, which do not materially alter its effect. He is satisfied that none of the changes to the Order since application would substantially change the proposals such as would require notification to affected persons under section 13(4) of the TWA. 1 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdf 3 15. The letter conveying the planning direction will issue shortly, at the same time as the Order is made, following the publication of a notice of determination in the London Gazette. Notice under section 14 of the TWA 16. This letter constitutes the Secretary of State’s notice of his determination to make the Order with modifications, for the purposes of section 14(1)(a) and section 14(2) of the TWA. Your clients are required to publish newspaper notices of the determination in accordance with section 14(4) of the TWA. Challenges to decision 17. The circumstances in which the Secretary of State’s decision may be challenged are set out in the note attached at Annex 2 to this letter. Distribution 18. Copies of this letter are being sent to all those who made representations in response to the application. Yours faithfully, Martin Woods 4 ANNEX 1 CONDITIONS WHICH THE SECRETARY OF STATE INTENDS TO ATTACH TO THE DEEMED PLANNING PERMISSION Interpretation In the following conditions:- “the Applications Rules” means the Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 (S.I.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Rail Priorities Statement Five Priorities for Immediate Action and Investment
    NORTHERN ECONOMIC FUTURES COMMISSION NORTHERN RAIL PRIORITIES STATEMENT FIVE PRIORITIES FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION AND INVESTMENT March 2012 © IPPR North 2012 Institute for Public Policy Research 1 IPPR North | Northern rail priorities statement: Five priorities for immediate action and investment Foreword in skills.2 Rail investment will provide the platform for The Northern Economic Futures Commission is sustainable growth for the northern regions. More developing a medium-term strategy for sustainable specifically, investment in infrastructure priorities that economic development in the North of England. This is a make rail franchises cheaper to run reduce long-term sizeable challenge, yet one which needs to be taken on subsidies, increasing productivity and making growth if the North is to be at the vanguard of the UK’s recovery more sustainable. and able to compete in the global economy. Alongside • The economic interdependence of the North’s eight skills and innovation, transport infrastructure is crucial city-regions will only increase: Much economic growth for ensuring that the northern economy is the driver of over the coming years will be driven by the expansion of national prosperity that it has the potential to be. knowledge-based sectors that increasingly rely on larger Our work in the area of transport continues to develop employment catchment areas. To ensure that growth is not the Northern Way Transport Compact’s previous constrained, transport provision will need to be improved consideration of what the strategic transport priorities and better joined up between and within the city regions. A for the North of England should be.1 But the urgency is report by LSE’s Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC) now far greater.
    [Show full text]
  • LNW Route Specification 2017
    Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Route Specifications 2017 London North Western London North Western July 2017 Network Rail – Route Specifications: London North Western 02 SRS H.44 Roses Line and Branches (including Preston 85 Route H: Cross-Pennine, Yorkshire & Humber and - Ormskirk and Blackburn - Hellifield North West (North West section) SRS H.45 Chester/Ellesmere Port - Warrington Bank Quay 89 SRS H.05 North Transpennine: Leeds - Guide Bridge 4 SRS H.46 Blackpool South Branch 92 SRS H.10 Manchester Victoria - Mirfield (via Rochdale)/ 8 SRS H.98/H.99 Freight Trunk/Other Freight Routes 95 SRS N.07 Weaver Junction to Liverpool South Parkway 196 Stalybridge Route M: West Midlands and Chilterns SRS N.08 Norton Bridge/Colwich Junction to Cheadle 199 SRS H.17 South Transpennine: Dore - Hazel Grove 12 Hulme Route Map 106 SRS H.22 Manchester Piccadilly - Crewe 16 SRS N.09 Crewe to Kidsgrove 204 M1 and M12 London Marylebone to Birmingham Snow Hill 107 SRS H.23 Manchester Piccadilly - Deansgate 19 SRS N.10 Watford Junction to St Albans Abbey 207 M2, M3 and M4 Aylesbury lines 111 SRS H.24 Deansgate - Liverpool South Parkway 22 SRS N.11 Euston to Watford Junction (DC Lines) 210 M5 Rugby to Birmingham New Street 115 SRS H.25 Liverpool Lime Street - Liverpool South Parkway 25 SRS N.12 Bletchley to Bedford 214 M6 and M7 Stafford and Wolverhampton 119 SRS H.26 North Transpennine: Manchester Piccadilly - 28 SRS N.13 Crewe to Chester 218 M8, M9, M19 and M21 Cross City Souh lines 123 Guide Bridge SRS N.99 Freight lines 221 M10 ad M22
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrative Option Schemes in CP5 HLOS
    Illustrative Option schemes in CP5 HLOS The Department worked with Network Rail, the train operators and the transport authorities in the major cities to build up shared information on current rail usage. As far as practicable a shared view was also agreed on forecast demand, using standard rail industry models but adjusting these where there was evidence of likely stronger growth. This forecast growth is stated as a peak demand to be met in the HLOS. The forecast growth was assessed against current plans for train service provision in 2019. Illustrative train service enhancements that provided the capacity to meet this demand were identified and modelled for the morning peak services in London, Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds. In many cases these were directly based on the work undertaken by recent rail industry Route Utilisation Strategies (RUS). In some cases, notably in Leeds and Manchester, recent Government commitments to funding electrification and capacity enhancements had happened after the RUS and so the Department worked with key stakeholders to determine the most likely train service patterns the infrastructure changes might produce. The illustrative peak train services are not what will happen; that will be guided both by the rail industry’s response to the HLOS in the Strategic Business Plan for CP5 where the industry will set out how it proposes to meet the HLOS, and by the outcome of future train operator franchise competitions. But the illustrative train services are needed for the Department to confirm that a value for money solution can be provided to meet peak demand. It is likely the rail industry will produce a more detailed and efficient solution, and in this context the illustrative option can be viewed as the simple answer that should be bettered.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Route Study March 2016 Foreword March 2016 Network Rail – East Midlands Route Study 02
    Long Term Planning Process East Midlands Route Study March 2016 Foreword March 2016 Network Rail – East Midlands Route Study 02 We are delighted to present the East Midlands Route Study, a The work carried out within this Route Study enables us to identify document which sets out the building blocks of our strategic vision any gaps between the planned capability of the network in 2023, for delivering rail growth throughout the East Midlands over the and the capability required to meet forecast growth for passenger next 30 years. and freight demand. By also looking ahead over the longer term to 2043, we can build our understanding of capacity needs in the The East Midlands route serves many different rail markets, long future, making plans to deliver those in the most efficient manner. distance and commuting services operate regularly into London St Pancras International. Strong links between urban centres, such as Network Rail has led the development of the East Midlands Route Nottingham, Leicester and Derby, help people travel for work, Study which was published as a Draft for Consultation in January education and leisure. Being located at the heart of Britain’s rail 2015, and was open for consultation until April 2015. The study has network means the Route forms a key part of major cross country been developed using a collaborative approach with input from the and freight journeys. rail industry, local authorities, users and developers from the freight industry, the Department for Transport and Rail Delivery Group. Over recent years, the rail industry has seen consistent growth in demand and this is forecast to continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Lessons Developing the Northern Powerhouse Northern Hub & North West Electrification
    Learning Lessons developing the Northern Powerhouse Northern Hub & North West Electrification David Woods FPWI Senior Project Engineer 8th Dec 2015 / 1 Learning Lessons developing the Northern Powerhouse What is the Northern Powerhouse Northern Hub and NW Electrification overview Background and work completed Major hub interventions including Ordsall Chord Electrification Phases and Route Enhancements Recent successes and lessons learnt/learning 8th Dec 2015 / 2 What is “The Northern Powerhouse” The Northern Powerhouse is a concept with the aim to transform Northern growth, rebalance the country’s economy and establish the North as a global powerhouse - aiming to bridge the economic gap between the north and south by attracting investment and improving transport links between its towns and cities Transport is a fundamental part of achieving these goals and how we will develop the long-term investment programmes needed for improvement in transport links between the North's major cities, to allow them to compete together as one major economy. The plan covers rail, highway, airport, freight and integrated transport. Rail plan to address: journeys too slow – particularly east to west overcrowding infrequency of services poor rolling stock – access for all peak times – overcrowding north to south Northern Hub and Electrification is the 1st phase of the Northern Powerhouse ~ £2BN investment. Leading to the overall investment of £10BN to the Northern Powerhouse by 2033 - linked to the benefits of HS2. 8th Dec 2015 / 3 Rolling Stock comparison
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Engineering Works Supplied by Northern Rail June 14 Huyton Blockade • Northern Hub Capacity Enhancement Scheme To
    Summary of engineering works supplied by Northern Rail June 14 Huyton blockade • Northern Hub Capacity Enhancement Scheme to deliver four tracks, with looping opportunities, through Roby and Huyton • Phase One, to be delivered in conjunction with electrification, provides a third line, and 90mph through line speeds to/from Manchester • The fourth line requires a small amount of land take and associated consents issues, but is intended to be delivered during 2016 • 9 day blockade from Saturday 5th July through to Sunday 14th July 2014 • Amended train service and rail replacement buses • Liverpool – Wigan – Preston: Two trains per hour St Helens Central – Wigan North Western (one per hour extending to/from Blackpool North) Preston – Ormskirk service will run to normal timetable but formed of 3 coaches Wigan – Kirkby service will run to normal timetable Replacement buses to serve stations between Liverpool Lime Street and St Helens Central On Saturday 13th and Sunday 14th July work will take place in the St Helens Central area, so buses will run between Liverpool and Wigan • Liverpool – Earlestown – Manchester/Warrington: On Monday to Friday between 0600 and 2200 access is available to St Helens Junction (single line working from Earlestown) One train per hour will run St Helens Junction – Manchester Victoria, increasing to two per hour at peak times Step free interchange available between trains and buses at St Helens Junction Overnight and at weekends electrification work is taking place over Sankey Viaduct (west of Earlestown)
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Sparks
    Northern Sparks Report of the North of England Electrification Task Force March 2015 Foreword by Andrew Jones MP Chair of the North of England Electrification Task Force Welcome to the report of the North of England Electrification Task Force. Our brief was to prioritise the rail lines of the North of England for future electrification and we have done that. The thirty-two lines of the Northern Rail and TransPennine Express franchise areas currently without electrification have all been considered and prioritised. The results have been grouped into three tiers, with Tier One being the most immediate priority. We have placed economic growth at the centre of our work. The Task Force agreed early on that the economic benefits of electrification would be the dominant factor in our assessments. We have worked on the premise that all the lines of the North would be electrified, it is only a question of when. This report is a team effort. That team has come from across the North; bringing together different regions, different political parties and different tiers of government. And it has been a harmonious and unanimous effort throughout. It is from the North for the North. It is to be seen in the context of the government’s investment in the electrification of our rail network. It is also to be seen in the context of the Northern Powerhouse and the work to drive the economy of the North of England. I would like to thank all the Task Force members - Julie Hilling MP, Ian Swales MP, The Leader of Bradford City Council (Cllr Dave Green) and the Leader of Warrington Borough Council (Cllr Terry O’Neill) – for all their hard work and enthusiasm.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Hub
    Northern Hub Project Background Northern Hub The Northern Hub programme will transform rail travel in the North of Client England. It is a significant investment to stimulate economic growth in UK Department for Transport the North of England by making rail travel across the area faster and Location more frequent. The Northern Hub will boost the region’s economy by Manchester, UK £4.2bn and create 20,000 to 30,000 extra jobs in the North. Start Date When complete, it will ease the rail bottleneck around Manchester 2009 Piccadilly Station and free-up space on the network for faster, more frequent services, including: End Date 2018 up to 700 extra trains per day with capacity for 44 million more people to travel by train each year Duration 108 months two new fast trains per hour between Manchester Victoria and Liverpool Contract Value six instead of four fast trains per hour between Leeds and Manchester £560m faster journeys across the North: Services Provided - up to 10 minutes faster between Leeds and Manchester Programme management, - up to 10 – 15 minutes faster between Liverpool and Manchester station redevelopment and renewal, whole railway upgrade a new direct service through Manchester city centre to Manchester Airport faster, more frequent services connecting Sheffield and East Midlands, Chester, Bradford, Halifax, Hull, Newcastle and the North East. For more information please visit www.networkrailconsulting.com Scope of Works This extensive programme of works introduction of a fourth platform a new railway link between includes:
    [Show full text]
  • Midland Main Line Speed-Up
    RA 004 1 February 2014 action Midland main line speed-up New 125 speed limit signs being installed at Bromham Road bridge, Bedford. From left, are Richard Walker, the route delivery director (East Midlands) for Network Rail, Dave Diskin, the framework manager from contractor Carillion and David Horne, managing director for East Midlands Trains Picture: East Midlands Trains For the first time, trains are now able to operate at speeds of up to 125 mph on action certain parts of the Midland main line, after a £70 million line improvement scheme delivered by Network Rail in partnership with East Midlands Trains. The faster timetable was good news for passengers travelling between London and railaction Sheffield, Chesterfield, Derby, Nottingham, East Midlands Parkway, Leicester and Loughborough. railaction is edited by A total of 159 miles of track was upgraded, some level crossings were replaced John Stanford by bridges, and signalling modified. It allowed EMT to reduce the average 82 Colvestone Crescent weekday journey time between Sheffield and London by seven minutes, between London E8 2LJ Nottingham and London by five minutes and between Derby and London by four minutes. Further improvements to journey times will be introduced during 2014. “The route provides a vital artery for South Yorkshire, the East Midlands and john.stanford Northamptonshire,” said David Horne, EMT managing director. “Faster journeys are @railwatch.org.uk vital for economic growth and this major investment in track and signalling will help us to provide faster and more reliable journeys.” 020 7254 3885 www.eastmidlandstrains.co.uk Network Rail’s maintenance underspend causes delays The Office of Rail Regulation believes over half of the delays on the network arise from failures by Network Rail and of these, about half are the result of infrastructure twitter: @railfuture failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Rail - Northern Programmes
    PWI Seminar 28th February 2017 Network Rail - Northern Programmes David Lawrance Head of Engineering 5-Mar-17 / 1 What is Northern Programmes? NWEP challenges Transpennine Route Upgrade Future Pipeline Cool Tech 5-Mar-17 / 2 Northern Programmes is not… • Northern Powerhouse • Northern Powerhouse Rail • Northern Hub (although that is part of it) • HS2 • HS3 • TfN • ???!! 5-Mar-17 / 3 Northern Programmes is… • Part of Network Rail Infrastructure Projects • Created in August 2016 from pre-existing components of IP Central and IP SNE • Comprises 4 discreet programmes of work under a single leadership team to … • Provides an integrated delivery capability aligned with TOCs and key stakeholders across the north • Enables sharing of specialist resources, lessons learn and best practice North West Electrification Enhancements Transpennine Route Upgrade Ordsall Chord + Development Pipeline • ~ £1+bn confirmed scope + CP6 pipeline • Big and exciting and happening all around us right here in the North! 5-Mar-17 / 4 Northern Programmes 1. Ordsall Chord 2. North West Electrification 3. Enhancements 4. Transpennine Route Upgrade 5. Development 5-Mar-17 / 5 Video Clip - Network Arch Bridge Lift 1. Ordsall Chord, Bridge Lift-2017 02 21- Long.mp4 5-Mar-17 / 6 Northern Programmes 1. Ordsall Chord 2. North West Electrification 3. Enhancements 4. Transpennine Route Upgrade 5. Development 5-Mar-17 / 7 North West Electrification 5-Mar-17 / 8 Video Clip – NWEP Phase 4 2. NR_NorthWest_Phase4_Intranet_01.mp4 5-Mar-17 / 9 Contractors – NWEP Phase 3 Volker Rail
    [Show full text]
  • Salford's Priorities for Rail Service and Station Investment
    SALFORD’S PRIORITIES FOR RAIL SERVICE AND STATION INVESTMENT TO INFORM THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SALFORD RAIL STRATEGY LYNWOOD TRANSTEC LTD, CONSULTANTS TO THE RAILWAY & TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES, Lynwood House, 7 Lynwood Grove, STOCKPORT SK4 5DP STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT 1. THE PURPOSE OF A SALFORD RAIL STRATEGY 2. THE OBJECTIVES OF THE RAIL STRATEGY 3. THE CONTEXT OF THE RAIL STRATEGY Local / Regional context The Local Context The Regional Context The Rail North Long Term Rail Strategy (LTRS) Transport for the North ‘Northern Transport Strategy’ and the first Independent Economic Review for the North The Northern Hub The Re-Franchising of the Northern Railway and TransPennine Express Future franchises Transport for Greater Manchester Ten Year Rail Plan The Greater Manchester Transport Vision for 2040 4. RAIL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SHORT TERM ELECTRIFICATION Proposals for Future Electrification Currently Committed Schemes TRAIN SERVICE DEVELOPMENT Summary of Key Service Changes – TransPennine Summary of Key Service Changes – Arriva Northern Railway IMPROVEMENTS TO SALFORD RAILWAY STATIONS Existing commitments Accessibility initiatives Salford Central Irlam Salford Crescent Walkden 5. INTERCHANGE AND INTEGRATION Regenerating communities through station development zones Station retail shops 6. RAIL IN THE COMMUNITY The National Context The Regional Context The Local Context - Station Adoption Community Rail Partnerships in practice The Journey Forward 7. RAIL FREIGHT IN GREATER MANCHESTER 8. LONGER TERM INTERVENTIONS Light rail, tram-train and associated
    [Show full text]
  • The Rail User Express. We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News
    September 2018 Welcome to the Rail User Express. Feel free to forward it to a colleague, or to reproduce items in your own newsletter (quoting sources). For further detail of any of the stories mentioned, consult the relevant website, or come back to me for the source material. Please say if you no longer wish to receive Rail User Express, or if you know of anyone or any Rail User Group (RUG) who would like to be added to the circulation list. Inevitably but regrettably, this month’s issue is largely taken up by the impact of the May timetable change, exacerbated by ongoing industrial action. Passengers’ habits are changing: many now use the car for some or all of their journey, which is bad news for the environment, but potentially fatal for further expansion of the railway. Winning them back will be a challenge for all of us. Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line The Far North Review Team, which was set up in 2016 to review every aspect of the Far North Line, met on 7 September to discuss progress so far, and future plans in respect of line capacity, higher speed limits, signalling, better trains and timetable structure. NR, ScotRail and Transport Scotland are working on a raft of improvements, some incremental and some radical. The fruits of the discussions cannot yet be shared, as announcements will be made in due course, but Mike Lunan and Ian Budd from FoFNL came away smiling broadly! Rail Action Group, East of Scotland Replacement of 6-car sets on the North Berwick line by 4-car sets due to the late rollout of the Hitachi Class 385 trains and a shortage of rolling stock led to serious overcrowding.
    [Show full text]