Format for Reports of the Parties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Format for Reports of the Parties FORMAT FOR REPORTS OF THE PARTIES AGREEMENT ON THE CONSERVATION OF AFRICAN-EURASIAN MIGRATORY WATERBIRDS (The Hague, 1995) Implementation during the period 2003 and 2005 Contracting Party: Ukraine Designated AEWA Administrative Authority: Full name of the institution: Ministry of Environmental Protection of Ukraine Name and title of the head of the institution: Minister Mr. Pavlo Ignatenko Mailing address: Urytskogo str., 35, Kyiv, 03035 Telephone: +380 44 206 31 26 Fax: +380 44 206 31 26 Email: [email protected] Name and title (if different) of the designated contact officer for AEWA matters: Dr. Volodymyr Domashlinets Mailing address (if different) for the designated contact officer: Telephone: +380 44 206 31 26 Fax: +380 44 206 31 26 Email: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents 1. Overview of Action Plan implementation 5 2. Species conservation 6 Legal measures 6 Single Species Action Plans 6 Emergency measures 6 Re-establishments 7 Introductions 7 3. Habitat conservation 8 Habitat inventories 8 Conservation of areas 8 Rehabilitation and restoration 8 4. Management of human activities 9 Hunting 9 Eco-tourism 9 Other human activities 9 5. Research and monitoring 10 Status of research and monitoring programmes for species 10 6. Education and information 11 Training and development programmes 11 Raising public awareness 11 7. Final comments 12 8. Progress to implement Resolutions and Recommendations of the Meeting of the Parties 13 9. OPTIONAL SECTION – Planned and future actions 14 List of abbreviations and acronyms used in the report 15 References 16 Appendices 17 Appendix 1: Status of Single Species Action Plans 17 Appendix 2: List of sites of international importance Appendix 3: Status of management plans for sites of international importance 17 Appendix 4: List of research and monitoring programmes and projects 17 Appendix 5: List of national institutions involved in migratory waterbird conservation 17 3 Appendix 6: List of relevant World Wide Web addresses for national institutions involved in migratory waterbird conservation 17 Appendix 7: List of relevant migratory waterbird and habitat conservation projects initiated, ongoing or completed in the last three years 17 4 1. Overview of Action Plan implementation 1.1 Summary of progress to date Ukraine acceded to AEWA in 2003. The main directions of the work during last three years were associated with identification of legal and conservation status of the AEWA species in Ukraine, elaboration and implementation of monitoring, conservation and research programmes and projects focused partially or entirely on migratory waterbirds. There is a number of ongoing programmes and activities which are implemented on the national or regional levels and relevant to the AEWA action plan implementation. They are as follows: – the Programme of the National Ecological Network Development for the years 2002–2015; – State Programme on the Protection and Rehabililation of the Sea of Azov and the Black Sea Environment endorsed by Law of Ukraine of 22.03.2001 No. 1989- III; – Important Bird Area Programme; – Conservation of Biodiversity in th Azov-Black Sea Ecological Corridor (GEF project); – VI International Census of White Stork; – Monitoring of wintering waterbirds; – Annual censuses of waterbirds during migrations. 1.2 Outline of planned actions for national implementation over the next three years – Implementation of the Programme of the National Ecological Network Development for the years 2002–2015; – Development and endorsement of the species action plans; – Monitoring of the waterbirds; – Identification of new IBAs; – Preparation and publication of new edition of the Red Data Book of Ukraine – Extension of existing and creation of new protected areas, inter alia: o Nyzhnodnistrovsky National Nature Park of total area 21,400 ha; o Tuzlovski limany Regional Landscape Park of total area 20,000 ha; 1.3 Outline of priorities for international co-operation over the next three years – Development and carrying out of bi- and multilateral projects and programmes for waterbird species and habitat conservation; – Transfrontier co-operation in development of the Pan-European Ecological Network; 5 – 2. Species conservation Legal measures 2.1 Has a national policy/strategy or legislation to protect and conserve species covered by the Agreement (Table 1: column A; column B) and their supporting important areas been developed? If so: a. What are the main features of the policy/legislation? Main features of the policy/legislation are as follows: – support, creation of new and extension of existing protected areas; – system of control and licensing of taking animals from the wild; – building of ecological network; – conservation of biological and landscape diversity; – user pay principle. Main laws that regulate conservation of wild animals including birds covered by AEWA – Law on Environment Protection; – Law on the Animal Kingdom; – Law on Ecological Network; – Law on Nature Reserve Fund; – Law on Hunting. b. Which organisations are responsible for implementation? – The Ministry of Environmental Protection of Ukraine – State Committee for Forestry of Ukraine – State Department for Fishery of the Ministry of Agriculture of Ukraine c. How does it relate to other national initiatives (e.g. national Biodiversity Action Plans)? 2.2 What legal measures or practices has your country developed to prohibit or regulate for the following (refer also to section 4 on hunting): a. Taking of, and trade in birds listed in Column A and B of Table 1 (where utilization or trade contravenes the provisions set out in paragraphs 2.1.1 (a) and 2.1.2 of the Action Plan)? Taking of the animals from the wild including birds is regulated and based on the scientifically justified system of permits and licenses. b. Methods of taking? Methods of taking are regulated by the laws of Ukraine "On the Animal Kingdom", "On Hunting" as well as the Bern Convention to which Ukraine is a Party. c. Setting of taking limits and monitoring these limits? 6 Setting of taking limits for the species is a general legislative rule. d. Sustainable hunting of species listed in Categories 2 and 3 (and marked by an asterisk) in Column A only? Only those portions of the population is allowed to be taken from the wild which do not harm the viability of the species. e. Exemptions to the provisions set out in paragraphs 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3? No exemption is set. Single Species Action Plans 2.3 Of the species covered by the Agreement (species listed in Table 1: column A), which spend part or all of their life history in your country, which have formal international (Category 1, species marked with an asterisk) or national (column A) Single Species Action Plans: a. Proposed? No Single Species Action Plan is prepared yet. b. In preparation? It is expected that the relevant national action plans will be prepared based on the Single Species Action Plans adopted by the Meeting of the Parties to AEWA c. Being implemented? Single Species Action Plan is being implemented Please append a list of species and their action plan status. (For international plans indicate which other countries are involved in plan development/implementation.) Emergency measures 2.4 Describe any bilateral or multilateral co-operative action that your country has undertaken to develop and implement emergency measures to conserve species in response to unfavourable or endangering conditions occurring in the Agreement area. Such co-operative actions have not been developed yet. Re-establishments 7 2.5 Has a policy on species re-establishments been developed in your country? If yes, please outline the main features of the policy and give details of any re-establishment programmes for species covered by the Agreement. No Introductions 2.6 Has your country developed and implemented legal measures to prohibit the introduction of nonnative species? Please provide details, particularly describing measures to control the release or introduction of non-native species (please indicate which species and their status). According to the Law of Ukraine “On the Animal Kingdom” no new species introduction is allowed without prior scientific justification and a special permit issued by the competent national authority (Ministry of Environmental Protection). 8 3. Habitat conservation Habitat inventories 3.1 Has your country developed and published inventories of important habitats for species covered by the Agreement? If yes, please provide details, including any provisions to maintain or update these inventories. Yes. Ukrainian Society for Bird Conservation published a book “Important Bird Areas” which describes the most valuable habitats for bird species including those covered by AEWA. 3.2 Has your country undertaken a strategic review of sites to develop a national network of important sites or areas for species covered by the Agreement? Please append a list of identified sites of international importance. Ukraine has 33 Ramsar sites, which are considered to be important for waterbird conservation. Conservation of areas 3.3 Describe the legal frameworks and other measures through which sites (including transfrontier sites) including of international importance gain practical protection. (Please append a list of internationally important protected sites.) The Laws of Ukraine “On Environmental Protection” and “On Nature Conservation Fund” “Programme of the National Ecological Network Development for the years 2002–2015” provide a legal basis for development, creation extension and
Recommended publications
  • National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
    NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS National Reports to be submitted to the 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Uruguay, 2015 Please submit the completed National Report in Microsoft Word format (.doc, 97-2003), as an electronic file (not a printed copy) and preferably by e-mail, to Alexia Dufour, Regional Affairs Officer, Ramsar Secretariat ([email protected]) by 1 September 2014. National Report Format for Ramsar COP12, page 2 The structure of the COP12 National Report Format The COP12 National Report Format (NRF) is in four sections: Section 1 provides the institutional information about the Administrative Authority and National Focal Points for the national implementation of the Convention. Section 2 is a ‘free-text’ section in which the Party is invited to provide a summary of various aspects of national implementation progress and recommendations for the future. Section 3 provides the 66 implementation indicator questions, grouped under each Convention implementation strategy in the Strategic Plan 2009-2015, and with an optional ‘free-text’ section under each indicator question in which the Contracting Party may, if it wishes, add further information on national implementation of that activity. Section 4 is an optional annex to allow any Contracting Party that so wishes to provide additional information regarding any or all of its Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites). General guidance for completing and submitting the COP12 National Report Format IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ THIS GUIDANCE SECTION BEFORE STARTING TO COMPLETE THE NATIONAL REPORT FORMAT 1. All Sections of the COP12 NRF should be completed in one of the Convention’s official languages (English, French, Spanish).
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REVIEW of ECOLOGICAL and GENETIC RESEARCH of PONTO-CASPIAN GOBIES (Pisces, Gobiidae) in EUROPE
    Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 2016, 74, 110-123 G. Jakšić et al: Ecological and genetic research of Ponto-Caspian gobies DOI: 10.1515/cjf-2016-0015 CODEN RIBAEG ISSN 1330-061X (print), 1848-0586 (online) THE REVIEW OF ECOLOGICAL AND GENETIC RESEARCH OF PONTO-CASPIAN GOBIES (Pisces, Gobiidae) IN EUROPE Goran Jakšić1, *, Margita Jadan2, Marina Piria3 1City of Karlovac, Banjavčićeva 9, 47000 Karlovac, Croatia 2Division of materials chemistry, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Fisheries, Beekeeping, Game management and Special Zoology, Svetošimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia *Corresponding Author, Email: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received: 27 January 2016 Invasive Ponto-Caspian gobies (monkey goby Neogobius fluviatilis, round Received in revised form: 14 May 2016 goby Neogobius melanostomus and bighead goby Ponticola kessleri) have Accepted: 20 May 2016 recently caused dramatic changes in fish assemblage structure throughout Available online: 24 May 2016 European river systems. This review provides summary of recent research on their dietary habits, age and growth, phylogenetic lineages and gene diversity. The principal food of all three species is invertebrates, and more rarely fish, which depends on the type of habitat, part of the year, as well as the morphological characteristics of species. According to the von Bertalanffy growth model, size at age is specific for the region, but due to its disadvantages it is necessary to test other growth models. Phylogenetic Keywords: analysis of monkey goby and round goby indicates separation between the European river systems Black Sea and the Caspian Sea haplotypes. The greatest genetic diversity is Invasive gobies found among populations of the Black Sea, and the lowest among European Ecology invaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Research of Adsorption Properties of Glauconite-Based Composite Adsorbents
    Journal of Ecological Engineering Received: 2020.04.07 Revised: 2020.05.30 Volume 21, Issue 6, August 2020, pages 147–154 Accepted: 2020.06.15 Available online: 2020.07.01 https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/123245 Research of Adsorption Properties of Glauconite-Based Composite Adsorbents Lilija Bezdeneznych1, Olena Kharlamova1, Volodymyr Shmandiy1*, Tetiana Rigаs1 1 Faculty of Natural Sciences, Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskiy National University, Pershotravneva Str. 20, Kremenchuk, 39600, Ukraine * Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The article states that the receipt of insufficiently treated wastewater into water bodies is largely caused by the use of outdated water treatment technologies, the deterioration of the technological equipment, late adjustment of the technological regime, and effective methods of removing phosphates from water in decentralized water supply. In this regard, it is necessary to implement comprehensive measures to prevent and reduce the deterioration of water quality, to develop the effective methods of removing the phosphorus-containing substances from wastewater, to conduct constant monitoring (through automated observation posts) of surface water quality with timely manage- ment decisions. The adsorption properties of granular composite materials based on glauconite were investigated The composite granular glauconite materials with sunflower husk adsorbent have been found to be most effective. The efficiency of wastewater treatment was 78%. Keywords: enriched glauconite, activated
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Introduction 2 Oleg Popov, CEO of SCM 2 Maxim Timchenko, CEO of DTEK 4 DTEK Group at a glance 8 15 facts about DTEK Group 10 Mission, vision, values 12 Development Strategy until 2030 13 DTEK Group corporate governance structure 16 Key performance indicators of 2019 17 Location of DTEK Group production enterprises 18 Key Events in 2019 20 Top management of the DTEK Group 24 An overview of Ukraine’s industries and macroeconomic indicators 28 Electricity Market 30 Natural Gas Market 40 Ukraine’s macroeconomic indicators 44 Performance results 48 Production activity 50 Investment projects 62 Analysis of financial results 72 Corporate governance 74 Corporate governance structure 76 Supervisory Boards of the operating holdings companies 77 Risk management system 82 Compliance and corporate ethics 83 Dividend policy 85 Sustainability 86 Sustainability 88 Environmental protection 92 Society 100 Employees 110 Annex 1 122 Annex 2 124 Annex 3 128 2 Integrated report 2019 Integrated report 2019 3 Introduction Dear colleagues and partners, please find hereby the annual report ted itself to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals. As of DTEK Group. a result, our actions have remain consistent and our commitment to the principles of ESG (Environmental, Social and corporate Gov- In 2020, DTEK celebrated its 15th anniversary. This year has been a ernance) unwavering, as we strive to support the interests of socie- challenge for all of us because of the global coronavirus pandem- ty. For this purpose, we adopted our ESG Strategy. The 12 UN Sus- ic, which has reignited the discussion about the role and purpose tainable Development Goals were subsequently integrated into this of business for society.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Nas of Ukraine Archaeology
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF UKRAINE • INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY NAS OF UKRAINE ARCHAEOLOGY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL – FOUNDED IN 1947 KYIV FREqUENCY: qUARTERLY 2 2019 Editor-in-Chief CHABAI V.P., Corresponding Members of the NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Deputy editor-in Chief TOLOCHKO P.P., Academician of the NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Executive Secretary GAVRYLYUK N.O., DSc in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine Editorial Board BOLTRYK Yu.V., PhD in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine BOROFFKA N., Professor, Dr. Hab., German Archaeological Institute, Germany BRAUND D., Professor, Dr. Hab., University of Exeter, UK BRUYAKO I.V., DSc in History,Odessa Archaeological Museum of the NAS of Ukraine BUISKIKH A.V. , DSc in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine CHOCHOROWSKI J., Professor, Dr. Hab., Institute of Archaeology of Jagiellonian University, Poland DJINDJIAN F., Professor, Dr. Hab., Professor of the University of Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, France IVAKIN V.G., PhD in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine IVANCHIK A.I. Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, National Center for Scientific Research of France FORNASIER J. Professor, doctor. Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Germany KAIZER E., Professor, Dr. Hab., Free University of Berlin, Germany KORVIN-PIOTROVSKI O.G., PhD in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine
    [Show full text]
  • Socio – Economic Analysis of the Programme Area
    Socio – economic analysis of the programme area INTERREG NEXT POLAND – BELARUS – UKRAINE 2021 -2027 1 | Table of Contents 1. Summary .............................................................................................................................................4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................7 Diagnosis of the support area ....................................................................................................8 3.1. General information on the support area .......................................................................8 3.2. Population ............................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1. Density of population ................................................................................................. 13 3.2.2. Population growth ....................................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Population structure .................................................................................................... 15 3.2.4 Changes in population ............................................................................................... 17 3.2.5 Migration ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.6 Demographic trends ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Materials for YPEF 2019
    Young People in European Forests YPEF European contest about forests and forestry Educational material Ninth edition, 2019 1 Contents European Forests ..................................................................................................................... 3 Forests and forestry of Austria ................................................................................................................................... 25 Czech Republic ....................................................................................................................... 27 Estonia ................................................................................................................................... 30 Germany ................................................................................................................................ 37 Greece ................................................................................................................................... 43 Hungary ................................................................................................................................. 48 Latvia ..................................................................................................................................... 56 Lithuania ................................................................................................................................ 59 Poland ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report UKRAINE
    FAO/Czech Republic Forestry Policy Workshop Trends in Forest Use and Conservation – Policy Options for Action Turnov – Hrubá Skála, 21-26 March 2004 Country report UKRAINE 2 FAO/Czech Republic Forestry Policy Workshop Ukraine Trends in Forest Use and Conservation– Policy Options for Action Sergiy Zibtsev1, Vladimir Tarasenko2 1National Agricultural University of Ukraine, Kyiv 2Ministry of Environment of Ukraine Executive Summary Ukraine has relatively limited area of forests and lacks its own forest resources. Forests cover 9.4 mln ha of lands. The total volume of timber comes to 1.74 billion m3. Timber presently is the forth important natural resource in Ukraine following oil, gas and coal. Over the last decade, the development of democracy, open market economy and advanced society has achieved a great progress in Ukraine. Drastic changes in social and economical life exerted direct and indirect influence on forest sector, especially on condition of forests, biodiversity, and public attitude towards forests, production and consumption of wood products. Most part of Ukrainian forests - sixty five percent - use for environmental and public purposes. While occupying less than 6% of the area of Europe, Ukraine holds approximately 35% of its biological diversity due to location at the junction of various natural zones and covering of the crossing of animals' and plants' migration paths. Ukraine contains four natural zones: broad leaves woodlands, forest-steppe, steppe, and Mediterranean Natural landscapes are represented on nearly 40% of the territory of Ukraine. The least transformed natural landscapes can be found mainly under forests. Near 44% of forests performs protective and conservative functions. Since 1992, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology-Dnu-Dp.Ua Doi: 10.15421/112111
    ISSN 2617-2909 (print) Journal of Geology, ISSN 2617-2119 (online) Geography and Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology Geology, 30(1), 122–132. Journal home page: geology-dnu-dp.ua doi: 10.15421/112111 S.V. Melnychenko, H. I. Mykhaylichenko, Y. B. Zabaldina, S. S. Kravtsov, S. S. Skakovska Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology, 30(1), 122–132. The protected area as a tourism eco-brand Svitlana V. Melnychenko1, Hanna I. Mykhaylichenko1, Yuliia B. Zabaldina1, Sergiy S. Kravtsov1, Svitlana S. Skakovska2 1Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine, Kyiv, [email protected] 2National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Ukraine Received: 17.12.2020 Abstract. Branding of the protected area plays an important role in the process of forming Received in revised form: 14.01.2021 its attractiveness for the currently growing target market, focused on the consumption of Accepted: 21.01.2021 environmental friendliness as an unconditional value. The results of literature review show that when the object of branding is a national nature park or any other nature protected object, intangible elements of the brand (affirmative opinions, beliefs and associations) must be based on the principle of eco-friendliness, and the tangible elements (logo, colours, design, semantic and visual effects) reflect this primary value. This is the so-called eco-brand which provides the ecological prerogative of the positioning object. The aim of this paper is to analyze the tangible and intangible components of Ukrainian national nature parks brands, their current market positioning, as well as the development of proposals for eco-brand formation of the national parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Overview of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Research Conducted in Russia Over the XXTH Century
    Brief Overview of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Research Conducted in Russia Over the XXTH Century Andrey P. Yurkov1; Lidija M. Jacobi2; Alexey A. Kryukov3; Lidija G. Perevedentseva4; Maria F. Shishova5 1All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Russia. 2All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Russia. 3All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Russia. 4Perm State University, Russia. 5Saint-Petersburg State University, Russia. Abstract Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) is one of the most common terrestrial plant-microbe symbioses. The interest in studying AM is caused by its importance for the growth and nutrition of plants and its ecological role in preserving biological diversity. At present, 92% of plant families are known to form AM. Fungi in AM are obligate symbionts and belong to a monophyletic group – Glomeromycotina subdivision. Some researchers believe that formation of AM-symbiosis with fungi by ancient plants allowed them to inhabit land, which has led to the formation of the biosphere as we know it. AM is studied by researchers from around the world including Russia. This overview presents in brief the results of AM research in Russia during the Soviet period which did not receive international coverage due to its classified nature; the most prominent research schools and works of AM researchers are identified; main stages and lines of this research are listed, such as: distribution of AM in plant communities and different climatic zones, mycorrhiza anatomy and morphology, fungi species composition on different soils, collection of AM fungi and growing AM in vitro, physiological role of AM for agricultural plants, the impact different ecological factors have on AM fungi species composition and AM development, conditions for effective use of Am fungi to increase productivity and quality of agricultural plants as well as to perform biological recultivation of toxic soils and restore the fertility of degraded soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity
    Sixth National Report of Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity English version December, 2018 Kyiv – 2018 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ 4 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 5 Section I. Information on the targets being pursued at the national level .................................. 7 National Target 1 (NT1). Increasing the level of public environmental consciousness ............................... 7 National Target 2 (NT 2). Improving the environmental situation and increasing the level of environmental security ......................................................................................................................... 8 National Target 3 (NT 3). Attaining the environmental conditions safe for human health ..........................10 National Target 4 (NT 4). Integrating the environmental policy and improving the integrated environmental management system ......................................................................................................... 11 National Target 5 (NT 5). Halting the loss of biological and landscape diversity and establishing the ecological network .........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]