Therapy and the Sopranos

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Therapy and the Sopranos 1 The Sopranos’ Usage of Therapy as a Narrative Device Introduction On January 10, 1999, the landscape of HBO, and possibly all of television, was about to change. Long time television veteran David Chase (born David DeCesare) from The Rockford Files, Northern Exposure, and Almost Grown was premiering his next television series (Sepinwall 33). After six seasons of shows, capturing two Emmys for outstanding drama series along the way, The Sopranos cemented itself as one of the, if not the, greatest television drama ever created. At the center of it all was James Gandolfini, who played the leading role of Tony Soprano, a capo in the New Jersey Italian mafia. By the end of the series, Gandolfini himself earned three outstanding lead actor in a drama series awards. While the thing that initially drew people to Tony Soprano was his mafia background and his tendency for violence and infidelity, an element of the show that is essential to the series was Soprano's appointments with his therapist, Dr. Jennifer Melfi, played by Lorraine Bracco. These scenes were one of the staples of the series, and functioned as a critical narrative device. These sessions were depicted weekly on the show, and served as the revealing of Tony’s internal thoughts, as opposed to the “voice of god” that would be used in a narrator, or some other voiceover technique. This allows the audience inside the head of Tony Soprano, and he is able to debate his thoughts with Dr. Melfi, even if he sometimes ends up leaving the session in a rage and breaking a glass table in her office. It is in Dr. Melfi’s office that we see the real Tony Soprano, someone damaged and broken by his depression, who needs help. Ideally, someone like Tony Soprano should have it all: He has the wife, two kids, and house that American society tells us to desire, but his sessions with Melfi are his chance to escape all of that and figure out who he really is. To understand the role therapy had in the The Sopranos, I will look back at the very beginning of the show, before it was even created. David Chase's own life was an important factor in the decision to have Tony Soprano see a therapist, as Chase himself turned to one. Next, there will be an analysis of the show's main therapeutic relationship between Dr. Melfi and Tony Soprano, pointing out pivotal episodes and meetings, as at times, their business relationship finds its way outside of the four walls of Dr. Melfi's office. After that, I will examine how some of the show's other characters are influenced by Soprano's decision to go to therapy after seeing the progress he has made as their own problems begin to arise, like Tony Soprano’s wife. Tony Soprano and Dr. Jennifer Melfi The series opens with Tony Soprano sitting in a waiting room, staring at a figure of a naked woman. He is then invited into the office by Dr. Melfi, who asks him about his recent panic attacks. Tony’s initial reluctance is evident in his denial that he even had a panic attack, claiming that it is “impossible for him to talk to a psychiatrist,” and that he “can’t talk to [Melfi] about his personal life” (“The Sopranos”). While privacy is paramount to psychotherapy, in this very first session Dr. Melfi interrupts Soprano at one point to discuss some ethical ground rules, 2 potentially compromising that privacy (Gabbard 48). When agreeing to this appointment, Dr. Melfi already has prior knowledge of who Tony Soprano is from Dr. Cusamano, the Soprano family physician, as well as their next door neighbor. Melfi mentions to Tony Soprano that if she was to hear “that let’s say…a murder was to take place, not that I’m saying it would, but if,” she would have to report it to the authorities (“The Sopranos”). Soprano continues to tell his story about meeting with a man for ‘coffee’ who owed him money, when in actuality Tony Soprano finds this man on the street and proceeds to chase after him, ultimately running this man over with a car alongside his nephew Christopher Moltisanti (Michael Imperioli). This watering down of the truth is used several times by the writing staff throughout the series to humorous detail, as we are able to see what is really going on in Tony Soprano’s life, with Dr. Melfi only to ponder what he is really talking about (Gabbard 49). This scene continues on for the next ten minutes or so, mostly serving as exposition for introducing new characters until Soprano’s panic attack finally happens. He watches some ducks fly away in his backyard, and then keels over in pain. Soprano nurtured the ducks, much like his own family, who is also flying away from him. Back in the office, Soprano even tries to deflect the notion of his depression by making a pass at Dr. Melfi, but asking “what part of the boot” she is from when he sees that her name is Italian (“The Sopranos”). Melfi holds firm and continues to press on about Soprano’s anxiety and potential depression. Rather than answer her question honestly and admit defeat, he decides to stand up and walk out of the room. During this scene, Soprano’s voice does function as a voice of god while the audience sees flashbacks, but it is common practice for a series to make changes after the pilot, and this technique for the most part goes away. This first scene, lasting almost half of the entire pilot episode, sets the tone for the relationship between Soprano and Melfi. While Soprano is angry about the whole concept of going to therapy as it is opposed to the Mafia’s code of silence, or Omertà, he slowly warms up to the therapy as the end of the first season approaches (Vincent 123). Earlier in that season, Tony Soprano’s Uncle Junior gets word that Tony is seeing a therapist, and shares that information to Livia Soprano, Tony’s mother. In the episode “Nobody Knows Anything” (Season 1, episode 11) Junior goes to meet Livia at her nursing home, and decides something needs to be done about Tony, as Junior Soprano is technically the boss of the family. In the next episode, “Isabella,” Tony visits Dr. Melfi, but looks like a completely different person. He isn’t very well put together like the Tony Soprano we are used to. He isn’t as dressed up as well as we expect, with Soprano only wearing a golf shirt, with some of the buttons undone. We also see that he hasn’t shaved, and his stubble is present. Tony Soprano’s gusto is gone, saying he isn’t “a husband to his wife, a father to his kids, and a friend to his friends” (“Isabella”). Before his next appointment with Dr. Melfi, Soprano is awoken from his depression when his life is threatened, due to an attack on Tony by Uncle Junior’s hired guns. The music he awakes to cuts off once Soprano is able to process what is happening, and the scene jumps into real time. He survives the attack, and seems to be back to his old self. That night, Dr. Melfi and Tony Soprano have an impromptu meeting in either an empty parking lot or the middle of nowhere. This is likely against protocol for a normal client, but Melfi clearly regards Tony Soprano as not just another 3 client. To her, this relationship is exciting and unique. “She is fascinated by her celebrity ‘bad boy’ and she must be careful not to collude with his wish to transform the therapy into flirtatious bantering or worse“(Gabbard 50). In this moment, Melfi is in control of the session. Soprano has dropped the flirtatious act, and has become serious, partially due to the aftermath of the attempt on his life. He says that “When I was depressed, I said I didn’t wanna live… Well, I’ll tell you something… I didn’t wanna die. Every fucking particle of my being was fighting to live.”(“Isabella”). Now that Tony Soprano has been reinvigorated with life, his next priority is to figure out who is behind the attack, but Melfi seems to have it figured out first. In their first meeting in the next episode, Melfi has put the pieces together of the murder attempt, Tony Soprano’s visions of Isabella being the loving and protective mother to her baby Antonio, and Livia’s recent “memory loss.” Melfi tells Soprano that “Your subconscious was shouting something at you. On the day before the shooting, you said to me that she kept going on yet again about news stories of mothers throwing their babies out of windows,” implying that his mother had a part in the murder attempt (“I Dream of Jeannie Cusamano”). After that Tony Soprano is outraged, and begins to sway anxiously in his chair as Melfi provides more evidence for her case, including diagnosing Livia with borderline personality disorder. Within a minute, Tony has had enough. He stands up, flips over the glass pane on Melfi’s table, and charges toward her. At this point, Tony Soprano declares their relationship in therapy finished, while threatening to break “her face into fifty thousand fucking pieces” (“I Dream of Jeannie Cusamano”). When Soprano learns later that Melfi’s interpretation was correct, he returns to her office and seeks forgiveness. A humbled Tony Soprano sits in his usual chair, while the empowered Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Binge-Reviews? the Shifting Temporalities of Contemporary TV Criticism
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Communication & Theatre Arts Faculty Communication & Theatre Arts Publications 2016 Binge-Reviews? The hiS fting Temporalities of Contemporary TV Criticism Myles McNutt Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/communication_fac_pubs Part of the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, and the Publishing Commons Repository Citation McNutt, Myles, "Binge-Reviews? The hiS fting Temporalities of Contemporary TV Criticism" (2016). Communication & Theatre Arts Faculty Publications. 15. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/communication_fac_pubs/15 Original Publication Citation McNutt, M. (2016). Binge-Reviews? The hiS fting Temporalities of Contemporary TV Criticism. Film Criticism, 40(1), 1-4. doi: 10.3998/fc.13761232.0040.120 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication & Theatre Arts at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication & Theatre Arts Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FILM CRITICISM Binge-Reviews? The Shifting Temporalities of Contemporary TV Criticism Myles McNutt Skip other details (including permanent urls, DOI, citation information) Volume 40, Issue 1, January 2016 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/fc.13761232.0040.120 Permissions When should television criticism happen? The answer used to be pretty simple for critics: reviews were published before a series premiered, with daily or
    [Show full text]
  • The Sopranos Episode Guide Imdb
    The sopranos episode guide imdb Continue Season: 1 2 3 4 5 6 OR Year: 1999 2000 2001 2002 2004 2006 2007 Season: 1 2 3 4 5 6 OR Year: 1999 2000 2001 200102 200204 2006 2007 Season: 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 OR Year: 1999 2000 2001 2002 2004 2006 2007 Edit It's time for the annual ecclera and, as usual, Pauley is responsible for the 5 day affair. It's always been a money maker for Pauley - Tony's father, Johnny Soprano, had control over him before him - but a new parish priest believes that the $10,000 Poly contributes as the church's share is too low and believes $50,000 would be more appropriate. Pauley shies away from that figure, at least in part, he says, because his own spending is rising. One thing he does to save money to hire a second course of carnival rides, something that comes back to haunt him when one of the rides breaks down and people get injured. Pauley is also under a lot of stress after his doctor dislikes the results of his PSA test and is planning a biopsy. When Christopher's girlfriend Kelly tells him he is pregnant, he asks her to marry him. He is still struggling with his addiction however and falls off the wagon. Written by GaryKmkd Plot Summary: Add a Summary Certificate: See All The Certificates of the Parents' Guide: Add Content Advisory for Parents Edit Vic Noto plays one of the bikies from the Vipers group that Tony and Chris steal wine from.
    [Show full text]
  • Recession Proof Jobs
    September 2009 WWW.BERGEN.EDU/THETORCH VOLUME - 15 ISSUE - 1 Environment Club... pg 2 The Torch Meadowlands Campus... pg 3 THE STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF BERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE Textbook Resolution: What is it? SADAF KHURSID On April 1ST, Bergen resolution that would save even more difficult to burden for students. Some CO-EDITOR Community College held the students some money in attain.” of the recommendations that a public hearing to inform the long run. The Text Book Did you know the were stipulated included the The present economic the students that the tuition Resolution was proposed to average text book now costs following: recession has forced us to will increase by almost the senate to help students a minimum of $100.00? “[To] keep the same face the harsh realities of eight percent for the next cut back on some of the That is approximately three- editions of books for two drastic increases in every semester. This means expenses that they will be fourths the cost of tuition! years, give preference to arena from transportation to that you, the students, will facing. According to SGA, The Text Book low or no cost educational the cost of food. The most be paying more than you “The rising cost of the Resolution was passed April resources over expensive important change that has already are. college textbooks creates an 21st by the faculty senate. commercial text books, occurred and which affects Keeping that in mind, added burden to the tuition The Resolution consists of make professors place every student is the increase Student Government rate which is spiraling out suggestions or alternatives a copy of required and in tuition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Narrative Functions of Television Dreams by Cynthia A. Burkhead A
    Dancing Dwarfs and Talking Fish: The Narrative Functions of Television Dreams By Cynthia A. Burkhead A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Ph.D. Department of English Middle Tennessee State University December, 2010 UMI Number: 3459290 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 3459290 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 DANCING DWARFS AND TALKING FISH: THE NARRATIVE FUNCTIONS OF TELEVISION DREAMS CYNTHIA BURKHEAD Approved: jr^QL^^lAo Qjrg/XA ^ Dr. David Lavery, Committee Chair c^&^^Ce~y Dr. Linda Badley, Reader A>& l-Lr 7i Dr./ Jill Hague, Rea J <7VM Dr. Tom Strawman, Chair, English Department Dr. Michael D. Allen, Dean, College of Graduate Studies DEDICATION First and foremost, I dedicate this work to my husband, John Burkhead, who lovingly carved for me the space and time that made this dissertation possible and then protected that space and time as fiercely as if it were his own. I dedicate this project also to my children, Joshua Scanlan, Daniel Scanlan, Stephen Burkhead, and Juliette Van Hoff, my son-in-law and daughter-in-law, and my grandchildren, Johnathan Burkhead and Olivia Van Hoff, who have all been so impressively patient during this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Preston Sturges Authenticity of the Image and of Testimonial “In-Person Reenactment” from Familiar and Big Time
    r In Person: Margulies’s book is a vivid and wide-ranging in Postwar account of this type of re-enactment, offering Reenactment insight with implications that stretch across Cinema and Contemporary documentary and cinema history as a whole. New York: Oxford by Ivone Margulies. An associate professor in film and media at University Press, 2019. 227 pp., illus. Hunter College, author of a book on Chantal paperback: $29.95. Akerman (Nothing Happens: Chantal Alter- man’s Hyperrealisr Everyday [Duke Universtty From Nanook’s apocryphal seal hunt to Press, 1996]), and editor of Rites of Realistn: .., the kitschy dramatizations of an Unsolved Essays on Corporeal Cinema (Duke Universrty Preston _._.- Mysteries episode, re-enactment has been a Press, 2003), Margulies’s scholarship has long . uuivud consistent formal gambit throughout docu- been invested in documentary, French cine- Sturges mentanj's history. Over the years, as well, the ma, and the presence of the body on screen. sealants restaging of past events with nonprofessional The present volume seems a culmination of The Last «n-um actors has fallen in and out of fashion—some- her long engagement with these subjects. out times considered standard practice, sometimes Deftly argued and intricately constructed, Years of ._._...,..-- seen as documentary’s béte noire. Indeed, it’s In Person compn‘ses seven chapters that track, \nh \a-m.‘ 4...: IM- a...“ Inna-inww...“ something of an old film history chestnut that in roughly chronological order, the appear- Hollywood's the great wave of ve’rité and direct-cinema ances of in-person re-enactment in nonfiction First Writer-Director films of the 19505 and 19605 used their obser~ cinema from WWII to the present—from vational mode to reject it outright, expunging Orson Welles’s 1942 short film Four Men in a Nick Smedley and Tom Sturges the practice from nonfiction cinema in favor Raft (from his aborted, post-Ambersons of their apparently more “immediate” style.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Evolving Authorship, Developing Contexts: 'Life Lessons'
    Notes 1 Evolving Authorship, Developing Contexts: ‘Life Lessons’ 1. This trajectory finds its seminal outlining in Caughie (1981a), being variously replicated in, for example, Lapsley and Westlake (1988: 105–28), Stoddart (1995), Crofts (1998), Gerstner (2003), Staiger (2003) and Wexman (2003). 2. Compare the oft-quoted words of Sarris: ‘The art of the cinema … is not so much what as how …. Auteur criticism is a reaction against sociological criticism that enthroned the what against the how …. The whole point of a meaningful style is that it unifies the what and the how into a personal state- ment’ (1968: 36). 3. For a fuller discussion of the conception of film authorship here described, see Grist (2000: 1–9). 4. While for this book New Hollywood Cinema properly refers only to this phase of filmmaking, the term has been used by some to designate ‘either something diametrically opposed to’ such filmmaking, ‘or some- thing inclusive of but much larger than it’ (Smith, M. 1998: 11). For the most influential alternative position regarding what he calls ‘the New Hollywood’, see Schatz (1993). For further discussion of the debates sur- rounding New Hollywood Cinema, see Kramer (1998), King (2002), Neale (2006) and King (2007). 5. ‘Star image’ is a concept coined by Richard Dyer in relation to film stars, but it can be extended to other filmmaking personnel. To wit: ‘A star image is made out of media texts that can be grouped together as promotion, publicity, films and commentaries/criticism’ (1979: 68). 6. See, for example, Grant (2000), or the conception of ‘post-auteurism’ out- lined and critically demonstrated in Verhoeven (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Sopranos Finale Pool a B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z the Final Episode Airs This Sunday, June 10
    Sopranos Finale Pool A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z The final episode airs this Sunday, June 10. Don’t just predict who will live and who will die… How many more plot details can you predict? Murdered Dies Suicide Arrested/Jail Kills Injured Severely Illness Breakdown/Crazy Prospers Leaves/Quits Betrayed Betrays Disappears / Missing Returns Flashbacks Hallucinations Dreams Torture Time Travel own! Add your own! Add your own! Add your own! Add your own! Add your own! Add your own! Add your 1 Tony Soprano 2 Carmela Soprano 3 Meadow Soprano 4 AJ Soprano 5 Janice Soprano 6 Christopher Moltisanti 7 Kelli Lombardo Moltisanti 8 Adriana La Cerva 9 Dr. Jennifer Melfi 10 "Big Pussy" Bonpensiero 11 Silvio Dante 12 Gabrielle Dante 13 Michele "Feech" La Manna 14 Phil Leotardo 15 Furio Giunta 16 Little Carmine Lupertazzi 17 Uncle Junior Soprano 18 Paulie Walnuts 19 Artie Bucco 20 Charmaine Bucco 21 Richie Aprile 22 Rosalie Aprile 23 Hesh Rabkin 24 Dr. Elliot Kupferberg 25 Eugene Pontecorvo 26 Patsy Parisi 27 Benny Fazio 28 Little Paulie Germani 29 Bobby Bacala 30 Johnny "Sack" 31 Vito Spatafore 32 Agent Dwight Harris 33 Hugh DeAngelis 34 Add your own! 35 Add your own! 36 Add your own! 37 Add your own! 38 Add your own! 39 Add your own! 40 Add your own! Grid by Christopher Fahey graphpaper.com behaviordesign.com Sopranos Finale Pool Rules 1. Choose any number of combinations of characters (along the left side) and fates (along the top), then initial each of your predictions in the corresponding cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobody Knows Anything! Nobody! Advance Praise For
    GOLDMAN’S BULLDOG PRESENTS NOBODY KNOWS (THE THING THAT REALLY MATTERS ABOUT) ANYTHING! A USERS’ GUIDE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY WRITTEN BY: NOBODY! ______________________________ ADVANCE PRAISE FOR GOLDMAN’S BULLDOG “Let’s have Nobodies review the book before we publish it. That’ll give us a jump on the critics!” Nobody! 1. “Nobody! has written a book for Nobodies everywhere. Who knew there was a market?” Nobody on Madison Avenue 2. “Equivalent to Martin Luther’s ‘95 Theses’ only nailed to the door of science!” Nobody in Wittenberg 3. “Balanced skepticism!” Nobody at the Bureau of Weights and Measures 4. “Nobody! obviously knows nothing about science!” Nobody at Fermilab 5. “If you say it’s bad science, it’s humor. If you say it’s bad humor, it’s science. What an Interpretation!” Nobody in Copenhagen 6. “Nobody! is the black hole that everybody is afraid of!” Nobody at CERN 7. “It’s a deadly serious book with a science humor escape clause!” Nobody at The Claremont Colleges 8. “What escape clause? There’s no such thing as science humor!” Nobody at the Los Alamos Nuclear Testing Grounds 9. “Science in a nutshell!” Nobody on Maui 10. “What’ve you been smoking? A macadamia nutshell! Science for nuts!” Nobody at Planters Peanuts 11. “Ban this book!” Nobody in Boston 12. “Burn this book!” Nobody in Bradbury 13. “Steal this book!” Nobody at Sing Sing Prison 14. “Not in our schools!” Nobody at the Board of Education 15. “Nobody! is guaranteed to offend everybody!” Nobody at the Ministry of Truth 16.
    [Show full text]
  • The Museum of Modern Art Presents a Discussion of the HBO Series the Sopranos with the Series Writer/Director David Chase and No
    MoMA | press | Releases | 2001 | Discussion on The Sopranos Page 1 of 3 For Immediate Release February 2001 THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART HOSTS DISCUSSION ON THE SOPRANOS Discussion with David Chase and media writer Ken Auletta February 12, 2001 The Sopranos February 3-13, 2001 The Roy and Niuta Titus Theatre 1 The Museum of Modern Art presents a discussion of the HBO series The Sopranos with the series writer/director David Chase and noted media writer and author Ken Auletta, February 12, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. at the Roy and Niuta Titus Theatre 1. Recording the domestic dramas and business anxieties of family living the bourgeois life in a pleasant New Jersey suburb, The Sopranos is a saga of middle-class life in America at the turn of the century. Chronicled in twenty-six hour-long episodes, the first two seasons from the series will be shown in two four-day sequences at The Museum of Modern Art, from February 3-13 at the Roy and Niuta Titus Theatre 1. "The Sopranos is a cynical yet deeply felt look at this particular family man," remarks Laurence Kardish, Senior Curator, Department of Film and Video, who organized the program. "David Chase and his team have created a series distinguished by its bone-dry humor and understated, quirky, and stinging perspective - not usually seen on television." Renowned for his savvy profiles of power players in the media, Ken Auletta will join David Chase for a discussion of The Sopranos at The Museum on February 12. The Department of Film and Video gratefully acknowledges HBO for making the series available for public viewing.
    [Show full text]
  • Dangerio, Alan
    Alan Dangerio Hair Stylist IATSE LOCAL 706 & 798 FEATURE FILMS (Partial Credits): Ocean’s Eight department head – Universal PIctures Dir: Gary Ross – LP: Mike Tadross Cast: Anne Hathaway, Helena Bonham Carter, Mindy Kaling, Sarah Paulson Wonderstruck Hairstylist for Julianne Moore – Amazon Studios Dir: Todd Haynes – LP: Brian Bell Crisis in Six Scenes d epartment head – Amazon Studios (series) Dir: Woody Allen – UPM: Helen Robin Cast: Miley Cyrus, Michael Rapaport, Elaine May, Joy Hehr The Girl on the Train department head – Universal PIctures Dir: Tate Taylor – LP: Celia Costas Cast: Rebecca Ferguson, Edgar Ramierez, Luke Evans, Lisa Kudrow Can You Ever Forgive Hairstylist for Julianne Moore/department head – Fox Searchlight Me Dir: Nicole Holofcener – LP: Pamela Hirsch Zoolander 2 department head – Paramount Pictures Dir: Ben Stiller – LP: Clayton Townsend Cast: Ben Stiller, Kristen Wiig, Penelope Cruz, Owen Wilson Ricki And The Flash Hairstylist for Meryl Streep / department head – TriStar Pictures Dir: Jonathan Demme – LP: Ron Bozman Train Wreck department head – Universal Pictures Dir: Judd Apatow – UPM: Dana Robin Cast: Tilda Swinton, Amy Schumer, Brie Larson, Bill Hader, LeBron James Run All Night Department Head – Warner Bros. Dir: Jaume Collet-Serra – UPM: Ray Quinlan Cast: Joel Kinnaman, Ed Harris, Vincent D’Onofrio, Common, Genesis Rodriquez Seventh Son Hairstylist for Julianne Moore – Universal Pictures Dir: Sergei Bodrov – LP: Brent O’Connor Maps to the Stars Hairstylist for Julianne Moore – Prospero PIctures Dir: David Cronenberg – LP: Joseph Boccia This is Where I Leave Department Head –Warner Bros. You Dir: Shawn Levy – LP: Mary McLaglen Cast: Rose Byrne, Tina Fay, Jane Fonda, Connie Britton, Timothy Olyphant Winter’s Tale Department Head –Warner Bros.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Burnham Hegel FINAL.Docx
    CONTINENTAL THOUGHT & THEORY: A JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM Emancipation after Hegel Volume 2 | Issue 4: Emancipation after Hegel 108-138 | ISSN: 2463-333X Hegel without Lacan: on Todd McGowan’s Emancipation after Hegel Clint Burnham 0. A note on method If Todd McGowan’s new book on Hegel didn’t exist, we would have to invent it. McGowan is the giant of Vermont, the Bernie Sanders of the academy, the Larry David of Lacanian theory. In my review I make the following argument: desire is algorithmic, and realized in clickbait (clickbait names Hegel’s dialectics). McGowan’s book finds in Hegel a philosopher for the “after theory” era, a philosopher who forbids us from remaining satisfied with particularisms of the left or the right, a philosopher whose theory of contradiction is both universalist and grounded in the singular, a Hegel for whom love and duty are the slamdance of emancipation. 1. Getting distracted with Hegel In her study of the colonial origins of Hegel’s master-slave dialectic, Susan Buck- Morss asks what happens when we think of Haiti “as an agent in Europe’s construction” asking her reader to approach this question “in the form of a rebus, a picture puzzle, composed of three images.” 1 The first image is a 1787 illustration for Voltaire’s Candide by Jean-Michel Moreau le Jeune, depicting a slave “who has been mutilated by his master”,2 losing a hand and his leg; the second is a dream of 108 CONTINENTAL THOUGHT & THEORY: A JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM Emancipation after Hegel Spinoza’s, of “a certain black and mangy Brazilian… [an] Ethiopian who kept appearing with the same vividness again and again”; 3 the third is an anecdote of Adam Smith’s inveterate snatching at lumps of sugar when at tea.
    [Show full text]