DOCSLIB.ORG

Rio Vista Airport Pavement Management Plan, Drainage Assessment, and Electrical Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rio Vista Airport Pavement Management Plan, Drainage Assessment, and Electrical Plan Statement of Qualifications for Rio Vista Airport Pavement Management Plan, Drainage Assessment, and Electrical Plan Prepared for City of Rio Vista Prepared by Statement of Qualifications for RioRio VVistaista AAirportp Pavement Management Plan, DrainageiA AsseAssessment,ssment,ment,nt, and Electrical Plan July 22, 2010 765 The City Drive Suite 400 Mr. John Andoh Orange, California Transit & Airport Coordinator 92868 City of Rio Vista TEL 714 939 1030 FAX 714 938 9488 One Main Street Rio Vista, CA 94571 Re: Statement of Interest and Qualifications for Professional Airport Engineering Design and Planning Services for the City of Rio Vista and the Rio Vista Municipal Airport Dear Mr. Andoh: The City of Rio Vista is looking for the most qualified airport consultant to work with the City to improve the Rio Vista Municipal Airport. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) is that firm. We believe that Kimley-Horn is the right choice for the City based on the following: History of Stability and Strong California Presence. Kimley-Horn is an employee owned, national firm. Since its inception in 1967, our firm has never been sold or acquired, or merged with other entities. Furthermore, we are ranked in the top 20 national aviation firms by ENR, have been ranked No.1 firm to work for by CE News several times, and are in the top 100 companies to work for by Fortune. Kimley-Horn is stable. We are consistent and we’re not going anywhere. We are confident that the people and the company you see in California today will be the people and company you see for the life of your projects. Experienced Project Manager. As your project manager, I have spent over 18 years working on California airport projects including 13 years as a supervisor and engineer with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Western-Pacific Region Airports Division. Pride in Execution. Kimley-Horn is acutely aware of the financial challenges facing most municipalities these days. We are committed to: • Using local firms as subconsultants, as needed. • Working to identify and implement projects in the most cost effective manner, thereby providing the City the most bang for their buck. • Communicating closely with the City on the grant processes to make sure things run as smoothly as possible and to minimize any out of pocket or ineligible costs. Our team is thrilled about the opportunity to serve the City of Rio Vista and is ready to start immediately upon selection. If you have any questions or would like to discuss our approach or team capabilities in greater detail, please contact me any time at 714/939-1030, 310/251-7392 or at Kevin. [email protected]. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Representative list of airports we are working with within the FAA SFO ADO area: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Livermore Ukiah Stockton Gustine Modesto Dunsmuir Buchanan Firebaugh Kevin Flynn Salinas Oakland Project Manager Monterey Statement of Qualifications for RioRio VVistaista AAirportp Pavement Management Plan, DrainageiA AsseAssessment,ssment,ment,nt, and Electrical Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................3 2. Scope of Work ............................................................... 6 3. Project Personnel .........................................................10 4. Project Schedule ......................................................... 12 5. Experience and References .......................................13 6. Insurance Documents .................................................16 7. Appendix - Resumes ...................................................18 City of Rio Vista Airport ii | AZ770010.10 Statement of Qualifications for RioRio VVistaista AAirportp Pavement Management Plan, DrainageiA AsseAssessment,ssment,ment,nt, and Electrical Plan 1. Introduction At Kimley-Horn, our management approach is to provide the service and relationships common to very small local firms with the depth of resources of a larger, national firm. We do this seamlessly in a one cost center environment. What this means to you: • Personal Service – Our firm will provide a high level of involvement from the project manager, not just lip service from senior marketing or management. We aren’t about securing as much work as possible; we’re committed to winning the right work that best fits our culture and skill sets, and then ensuring it gets done well. • Communication and Resources – Your project manager, Kevin Flynn, will serve as your one primary point of contact, but we encourage you to get to know and trust our production staff as well. Rio Vista will have access to 55 offices and more than 1,500 of the best engineers and planners in the country. In some firms, different offices must subcontract or borrow from office to office to get available resources. This lends itself to creating islands within a firm or using simply the available resources, not the best resources. At Kimley-Horn, we have experts from around the firm doing the work they do best. • Quality Control – We implement a formal Quality Control Plan of each of our projects. As part of the plan, we assign a senior technical lead to review all deliverables before they are submitted. • Stability – Stability is a core value at Kimley-Horn. Because we are such a stable, great firm to work for, you will be dealing with the same management and same team members, from day one, for the life of your project. We are stable. We are consistent. We recruit and retain the best in the industry and we’re committed to serving the City of Rio Vista. • Outreach and Presentations – Kimley-Horn is proactive with communication and education for the public, staff, and other stakeholders in our projects, processes, and airport matters. We strive to understand the audience, issues, and message and tailor presentations that best communicate our message and result in the desired outcomes. As your project manager, I have successfully given hundreds of presentations to groups ranging from senatorial staff and senior city officials to public meetings of concerned citizens. A significant number of all projects completed by our aviation group are funded by the Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program Grants and Passenger Facility Charges. A large percentage of those have been within the Western-Pacific region, and many have been within the San Francisco Airports District Office. A representative list of our current projects and locations in California are as follows: Livermore Municipal Airport On-Call Consultant: Evaluate and rehabilitate runway and service road pavements Buchanan Field Airport Upgrade electrical Pavement rehabilitation Modesto City-County Airport Electrical and drainage master plans NAVAIDS upgrades Drainage study Gustine Municipal Airport Environmental baseline NAVAIDS Rehab airfield pavements Salinas Municipal Airport Safety upgrades Ukiah Municipal Airport Storm drain master plan and design Pavement rehabilitation Dunsmuir Municipal Airport Drainage and utility master plan King City Municipal Airport Electrical inventory, fencing and NAVAIDS upgrades Runway Safety Area EA Monterey Peninsula Airport Design Construction phase services City of Rio Vista Airport 3 | AZ770010.10 Statement of Qualifications for RioRio VVistaista AAirportp Pavement Management Plan, DrainageiA AsseAssessment,ssment,ment,nt, and Electrical Plan Additionally, our breadth of experience with the FAA comes from not only working with them, but from having staff participate and lead the development and implementation of various policies and processes, which are still in effect today. Our team possesses extensive knowledge and expertise with funding, policies, processes, and personnel. Our substantial knowledge and experience includes, but is not limited to: • How the FAA funding process works, the types of funds available, timing, and how to best compete for available limited funding • Interpretation and application of airport design standards • The Runway Safety Area Program • The evaluation, siting, procurement, and installation of NAVAIDS • The Advisory Circular system and associated requirements as they relate to airport design and construction standards • Operational issues associated with airfield safety and runway incursions • Maintaining airfield security • FAR Part 77—the airspace evaluation process • Grant Management including preparing Airport Capital Improvement Plans, grant applications, pay request, etc. • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other environmental issues related to airport development and project implementation Project Approach The City of Rio Vista is seeking a consultant experienced in aviation services to provide a detailed pavement management plan, drainage assessment, and electrical plan for the Rio Vista Airport. Kimley-Horn is an ideal choice for projects such as these, as this proposal will illustrate. Our approach to each of these projects can be summarized as follows: DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT Our approach to the Rio Vista project is to understand the existing drainage challenges and to provide creative solutions to these challenges. We propose to perform a detailed field review of the existing drainage patterns at the airport. We understand that there is some concern with scour associated with one of the swales adjacent to the airport. Our first step will be to understand the criticality of the ongoing erosion in order to perform a risk analysis and provide recommendations for protecting the channel. In a collaborative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADOT's $5.7B CIP Budget Cuts Highway Spending to $3.5B
    Friday Volume 4 Issue 37 Issue Date: June 28, 2013 CONNECTING THE LOCAL BUILDING INDUSTRY ADOT’s $5.7B CIP Budget Cuts Highway Spending to $3.5B By Eric Jay Toll for The gavel pounded “approved” on In a time when maintaining the the detailed subscriber-only 2013 Arizona Builder’s a challenging $5.7B ADOT budget. system and meeting growing Capital Project Issue. The subscriber- only 2014 Capital Project Issue will Exchange When you take out $2.6B from economic demands screams for Maricopa and Pima county taxpayers more improvements and projects, be published July 30). This includes and $1.2B for airports, the rest of the agency had to slash more than Maricopa and Pima county taxpayer- Arizona gets a paltry $1.9B for roads. $350M from its projected budget. voted revenue, airport and transit spending—most of which is paid Legislative robbery, improved fuel To put the current five year plan with federal grants. economy, and recession-caused into perspective, last year ADOT revenue declines combined to drain projected that it would spend $5.5B State Spending Drops $2B over 5 capital dollars from the Arizona for highways between fiscal 2013 Years Department of Transportation. and 2017 (AZBEX, July 31, 2012 and The five year capital budget covering fiscal 2014-2018 is a $500M drop from last year. Combine this year’s reduction with cuts last year, and the 2014-2018 budget is $2.2B less than the 5-year plan adopted in 2011. At the same time, the state’s road system cries out for increases maintenance and expanded capacity at an even higher pace as the state starts its post-recession growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Strategic Business Plan
    AIRPORT STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN ___________________________ MARANA REGIONAL AIRPORT MARANA, ARIZONA | FEBRUARY 2017 Marana Regional Airport Airport Strategic Business Plan Final Report Prepared for Town of Marana, Arizona By The Genesis Consulting Group, LLC 1202 E Maryland Ave, Suite 1D Phoenix, AZ 85018 In Association With Armstrong Consultants, Inc. February 2017 ADOT No. E5S3N . TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Marana Regional Airport – Business Plan .................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Airport Mission ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 Situational Analysis ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Overall Airport Development ...................................................................................................................................... 3 New Business Development Opportunities .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Matters Throughout Our Lives. 2040 Regional Transportation Plan PAG and Regional Transportation Planning PAG and Regional Transportation Planning
    Adopted July 1, 2010 Mobility matters throughout our lives. 2040 Regional Transportation Plan PAG and Regional Transportation Planning PAG and Regional Transportation Planning Pima Association of Governments (PAG) is a nonprofit metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the Pima County region. PAG’s planning area covers Pima County, a total area of 9,189 square miles, which is larger than some states. PAG is governed by a nine-member Regional Council with an elected official serving from each member jurisdiction, including the Cities of South Tucson and Tucson, Pima County, the Towns of Marana, Oro Valley and Sahuarita, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, the Tohono O’odham Nation and the Arizona State Transportation Board. PAG’s mission is to help promote good decision making for the region by providing accurate data and encouraging consensus among its members and the public. PAG’s programs focus on cross-jurisdictional planning issues, such as air quality, water quality, population growth and transportation. One of PAG’s primary responsibilities as the MPO is to coordinate the development of the long-range regional transportation plan. This long-range plan represents the work of the regional community; input was provided by all the jurisdictions, many interest group representatives and the public at large. The 2040 RTP presents the collective vision for the transportation network for the next 30 years. PAG provides staff support for the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA), a government entity that manages the $2.1 billion, 20-year RTA plan, which was approved by Pima County voters on May 16, 2006. The RTA is governed by a nine-member board, which includes the same representatives who serve on the PAG Regional Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Solano 4 Wind Project EIR 8 References Executive
    Solano 4 Wind Project EIR July 2019 8 References Executive Summary No references are cited in this chapter. Chapter 1, “Introduction” No references are cited in this chapter. Chapter 2, “Project Description” California Energy Commission. 2018 (August). Operational Wind Projects, Solano Wind Resource Area, 2018. Map scale 1:24,000. Available: https://www.energy.ca.gov/maps/renewable/wind/WindResourceArea_Solano.pdf. Accessed March 27, 2019. CEC. See California Energy Commission. Solano County. 1987 (May). Solano County Wind Turbine Siting Plan and Environmental Impact Report. Department of Environmental Management, Fairfield, CA. U.S. Geological Survey. 2019 (January). U.S. Wind Turbine Database. Available: https://eerscmap.usgs.gov/uswtdb/viewer/#14.02/38.16164/-121.79729. Accessed February 9, 2019. USGS. See U.S. Geological Survey. Chapter 3, “Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures” Section 3.1, “Aesthetics” Black & Veatch. 2019 (January 3). Solano Wind Energy Project, Wind Project Shadow Flicker Assessment. California Department of Transportation 2019. Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/. Accessed March 18, 2019. Federal Aviation Administration. 2018 (August 17). Obstruction Marking and Lighting, including Changes 1 and 2. Advisory Circular 70/7460-1L. Chapter 13, “Marking and Lighting Wind Turbines.” Federal Highway Administration. 2015 (January). Guidelines for the Visual Impact Assessment of Highway Projects. FHWA-HEP-15-029. Washington, DC. Page 8-1 Solano 4 Wind Project EIR July 2019 National Research Council. 2007. Environmental Impacts of Wind-Energy Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC. See National Research Council. Sacramento Municipal Utility District. 2007 (September). Draft Environmental Impact Report for the SMUD Solano Wind Project Phase 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Existing Conditions
    Buchanan Field Airport Master Planning Program Field A. INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Buchanan A > Inventory of Existing Conditions INTRODUCTION. Buchanan Field Airport (CCR) is the major general aviation reliever airport serving Contra Costa County and multiple communities located in the northeastern portion of the greater San Francisco Bay Area (see Figure A1). The Airport has been a catalyst for business growth in the region and has served as an anchor for the local employment base, as well as meeting the aviation transportation needs. Situated in an unincorporated portion of Contra Costa County, directly adjacent to the thriving urban heartbeat of the City of Concord, Buchanan Field Airport is a vital component of the transportation infrastructure serving the region for tourism and business. Buchanan Field Airport is well equipped to serve regional demand related to general aviation and business aviation needs. The Airport has a reputation as being an excellent aviation facility that offers a safe and efficient operational environment. The Bay Area continues to experience significant increases in business activity, commercial and residential growth, and economic development. Because of this, Buchanan Field Airport is also being presented with increasing operational and facility demands. Many of the areas surrounding the Airport, with many high quality homes and environmental amenities, have experienced significant residential development, resulting in homeowner concerns about the effect that the Airport may have on their lifestyle. Some of these homes and facilities are located within a two to three mile radius of the Airport. Thus, the Airport may influence the social, economic, and physical environments of the area in which it operates.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Cover.Ai
    Appendix C 14 CFR PART 150 REVIEW Appendix C 14 CFR Part 150 Review INVENTORY Ryan Airfield INTRODUCTION The purpose of this review is to provide an assessment for the current Noise Compati- bility Study by reexamining the noise and land use conditions at Ryan Airfield and the surrounding area. The information presented in this section will be used to identify existing and future noise-sensitive areas that may be adversely impacted by aircraft noise and to evaluate the current strategies to mitigate or avoid those impacts. The information in this chapter includes: A discussion of the purpose and procedures required to undertake a Noise Compati- bility Program, as described under Title 14, Part 150 of the Code of Federal Regula- tions (CFR) (formerly referred to as F.A.R. Part 150). A description of airport facilities, airspace, and airport operating procedures. A discussion of the roles and responsibilities for each of the entities impacted by aircraft activity from Ryan Airfield. An overview of the land use planning documents and tools applicable within the area surrounding the airport. The information outlined in this appendix was obtained through on-site inspections, interviews with airport staff, airport tenants, and representatives of Pima County Planning, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), and the Federal Avia- C-1 tion Administration (FAA). Information was also obtained from available documents concerning the airport and the Tucson area. This review is being prepared concurrently with the Airport Master Plan Update for Ryan Airfield. This provides ample opportunity for the full assessment of potential noise impacts of alternative master planning strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Plane Crashes in the Tucson Area
    Plane Crashes in the Tucson Area How Decea Originating, landing Many Date Type Plane Location of Incident sed or assigned airport Accident near Municipal Aavation 1 5/9/1926 Airplane Field 0 Municipal Airport 1 2/20/1928 Ex Army Airplane 1 Crashed near the Canda del Oro or 1 10/23/1928 Ryan Monoplane the Santa Catalina range 4 Municipal Airport Training plane crashed about a mile 1 8/7/1930 Curtis "Jenney" from Municipal Airport 0 Municipal Airport 1 4/7/1942 B17 Crashed 2 miles east of Vail 5 DM 1 6/20/1942 B-24 3 miles southeast of DM 8 DM 1 7/8/1942 B-24 Southeast of of DM 1 DM Rincon Mountains, Saguaro National 1 7/30/1942 B-24 Liberator Park 9 Unknown Rincon Mountains, Saguaro National 1 12/28/1942 AT-6 Park 1 Unknown 1 1/18/1943 B-24 50 miles southeast of DM 11 DM 1 1/26/1943 P-38 Hale Road by Muncipal Airport 0 DM 1 1/26/1943 Observaation Plane Davis Monthan 0 DM Crashed into mess hall on landing at 1 2/2/1943 P51 DM 3 DM 1 2/17/1943 Training Plane Giliuro mountains 0 Marana Army Field 1 2/17/1943 B-24 Consolidated Aricraft Plant 6 Consolidated Aircraft 1 3/11/1943 B-24 3 miles southeast DM 6 DM 1 4/12/1943 B-24 2 miles southeast of DM 10 DM 1 4/23/1943 B-24 East Whittier St & S. Alvernon Way 0 DM 1 5/7/1943 Training Plane Southwest of Marana Air Field 2 Marana Army Field Ryan School of 1 6/8/1943 Training Plane 7 miles west of Amado 1 Aeronautics 1 6/22/1943 Army Plane Crashed a Marana Airm Field 1 Marana Army Field crashed 40 miles southeqast of 1 7/9/1943 Vultee BT-13 Marana Army Field 2 Marana Army Field Consolidate 4 motor 1 9/16/1943 plane Crashed at DM 1 DM 1 3/7/1944 Training Plane 10 miles northwest of Ryan Field 1 Ryan Field 1 3/18/1944 B-24 In Sabino Canyon 10 Hamilton Field Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Page F-304
    Page F-300 Page F-301 Page F-302 Page Page F-303 Page F-304 Online Survey Responses (Summary) Page F-305 I-11 Survey Monkey Summary of Responses: Summer 2016 Public Scoping Question 1 Please tell us what problems you experience today, or anticipate in the future, related to transportation in the Corridor Study Area that the I-11 project could address. Please rank the following in order of importance to you. (1= highest ranking [most important], 5=lowest ranking [least important]). Relieve local congestion, improve travel time and 134 reliability (reduce how long a trip will take or ensure 67 certainty of travel time) 61 46 173 Relieve regional congestion, improve travel time and 139 reliability (between Southern and Northwestern Arizona) 75 68 41 158 Improve freight travel and reliability, reducing 125 bottlenecks on existing highways 72 72 50 158 Improve local access to communities and resources 73 (parks, recreation, and tourism) 56 98 73 173 Need for a different transportation mode than what 149 exists today 53 49 49 172 Support homeland security and national defense needs 73 34 81 58 226 0 50 100 150 200 250 1 (most important) 2 3 4 5 (least important) Other desirable outcomes (open-ended response): [responses not edited for spelling, grammar, or capitalization] Freeze construction of new homes until the current commuting demands are addressed and solved. Minimal disruption of the desert environment especially in the area of the Arizona Sonoran Desert Museum and the Saguaro National Park.. Protecting what is left of the southern Arizona natural world.
    [Show full text]
  • Membership Directory (1999-2000)
    19 Directory Errata Sheet Section 4. Notice of all regular meetings, including an agenda which lists all items of business on which action will be taken, will be posted to the Chapter’s Web Page not less than two weeks prior to the date on which the meeting is Some corrections/revisions were not included in the scheduled to be held. Upon written request to the Executive Director, members recently mailed directories. may also have a copy of the agenda mailed to them at the time of posting. For convenience, meeting agendas will be published in the Chapter’s newsletter Please cut the pages and punch the holes as shown for preceding the meeting. Included with the notice and agenda shall be a brief inclusion in your directory binder. The revisions are as description and/or explanation of those items of business on which action is proposed, in order to alert the general membership. Such advance notice and follows, agenda shall not be required for the second and any succeeding meeting(s) which may occur or be called during an annual meeting. Such advance notice, Remove and replace pages 19-20, if any, which is reasonably possible shall be given for special meetings called by the President to deal with urgent business of an emergency nature. Remove and replace pages 21-22, Emergency matters that impact directly on the operation of the Chapter that arise after publication of the agenda for a scheduled meeting of the Board may be acted upon by the Board during the meeting without prior notification to the Remove and replace pages 25-26, general membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: February 7, 2017
    Request for Qualifications Arizona Department of Administration Solicitation No. State Procurement Office ADSPO17-00006796 100 N 15th Ave., Suite 201 Description: Phoenix, AZ 85007 2017 Annual Professional Services List Part 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: February 7, 2017 ATTACHMENT 1 ........ OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE FORM ...................................... 2 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ............................................. 3 1.0 ..... FIVE (5) EXAMPLE PROJECTS ...................................................................... 3 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ............................................. 5 2.0 ..... EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE ......................................................................... 5 3.0 ..... FIRMS EXPERIENCE AND REVENUE ........................................................... 7 4.0 ..... FIRMS SERVICES ........................................................................................... 7 EXPERIENCE REFERENCES: .................................................................................. 8 ATTACHMENT 2-B .... ORGANIZATION PROFILE .................................................. 10 ATTACHMENT 3-A .... METHOD PROPOSAL ................................................... 112/14 ATTACHMENT 3-B .... KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSAL ........................................... 12 ATTACHMENT 3-C ... PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS ..................................... 27 ATTACHMENT 3-D ... PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Azaa) Spring Conference Presentation May 2018
    Spring AzAA May 2018 Topics • ADOT SASP Summary • Airport Land Use Compatibility SASP Process, Vision, and Goals Only two remaining chapters of SASP Report VISION. To provide the framework that will allow Arizona’s aviation system to meet the needs of citizens, visitors, and businesses by supporting economic competitiveness, connectivity, and accessibility with a commitment to safety, sound resource management, and partnerships. 2017 SASP Update Goals . Performance Measures and System Indicators Goals Performance System Measures Indicators Action-oriented Informational System Airports and Classifications The Arizona airport system is defined as all public-use airports owned by a political subdivision of the state or Tribal government. 2008/2017 Airport Classification Comparison Total Example SASP Airports Role/Classification 2008 SASP 2017 SASP Change Within 2017 Classification Commercial Service- Phoenix Sky Harbor International 2 2 International Tucson International Ernest A. Love Field 11 Flagstaff Pulliam Commercial Service- National 9 9 Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Show Low Regional Yuma International Marana Regional Reliever 8 8 Phoenix Deer Valley 8 Ryan Airfield Scottsdale Cottonwood Municipal GA-Community 24 Lake Havasu City 18 i6 Payson Safford Regional Ak Chin Regional GA-Rural 19 Chinle Municipal 17 i2 H.A. Clark Memorial Field San Manuel Bagdad GA-Basic 5 Eric Marcus Municipal 13 h8 Tombstone Municipal Tuba City Facility and Service Objectives • Not standards or requirements • Recommendations for services and facilities by classification • Minimum levels of development Component Airport Criteria Airside ARC Runway Surface Facilities Runway Length Approach Capability Taxiway Visual Aids Lighting Approach Lighting System Landside Operations/Maintenance Hangar Facilities Hangars Auto Parking Apron Terminal/Pilot's Lounge Landside Fixed-base Operator (FBO) Aircraft Maintenance Services Avionics Sales and Service Off-Site Rental Car On-Site Rental Car Restroom Phone Access (Landline or Cell) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    13.0 Land Use and Population of 3 feet (1 meter) below grade (if required by the landowner); removal of Project roads; and restoration of disturbed lands. This impact is considered to be potentially significant, and mitigation is required. Mitigation Measure LU-4: Guarantee Bond or Corporate Surety To ensure that future land uses in the Project area are not inhibited after the Project is decommissioned, the Applicant shall: a. Set aside decommissioning funds in the form of a surety bond or other bond acceptable to the County as a specific Project budget item; b. Execute the surety bond or other County-accepted bond on behalf of the Project in favor of the County, with an independent administrator of such funds, to cover all decommissioning costs in an amount approved by the County; and c. Maintain the bond for the life of the Project and through any transfer of ownership. With implementation of this mitigation measure, this impact would be less than significant. 13.5 REFERENCES California Department of Conservation (CDC). 2008. California Farmland Conversion Report 2004-2006. Available: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/products/Pages/ReportsStatistics.aspx Accessed: March 1, 2010. California Department of Conservation (CDC). 2004. California Farmland Conversion Report 2000-2002. California Department of Finance. 2009. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, 2001-2009, with 2000 Benchmark. Available: http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/estimates/e-5/2009/. Accessed: March 1, 2010. California Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2009. Suisun Marsh Facts. Available online at www.water.ca.gov/suisun/.
    [Show full text]