DOCSLIB.ORG

While Rome Burns Episode 12 – the Vespers of 88 BCE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
While Rome Burns Episode 12 – the Vespers of 88 BCE While Rome Burns Episode 12 – The Vespers of 88 BCE The ancient world was full of acts of Viciousness, barbarism, and cruelty. During war time, cities were burned, pillaged, plundered and their people were either butchered or sold into slavery. Human cruelty, it seems, is one thing that all societies have shared throughout time. One such instance of cruelty occurred in 88 BCE in the kingdoms surrounding the southern coast of the Black Sea. A tale of betrayal, murder, and unnecessary war awaits us. Today’s story is about The Vespers of 88 BCE. Sit Back, Relax, and Let me Tell you a Story… While Rome Burns. In the 90s BCE, the Kingdoms of Pontus and Kingdoms of Bithynia found themselves in conflict over the rulership of the land. At the time, King Mithridates VI of Pontus was working to expand his domain in the region around the Black Sea. His dream was to form a great Black Sea Empire that would rival the power and strength of Rome, who had a huge influence in the region. He eventually set his sights on the Kingdom of Bithynia. After the King of Bithynia, Nicmedes III married the sister of King Pontus and claimed lordship over her lands, Mithridates retaliated by invading Bithynia and installing his nephew as a puppet king. Nicomedes then fled to Rome and appealed to the Senate for aid. The Senate responded by sending the general Lucius Cornelius Sulla to drive out Mithridates from Bithynia and to settle the disputes between the two kingdoms. The attempt faced difficulties from the opposing army but eventually the Roman legions succeeded in restoring Nicomedes III to the throne of Bithynia. This wasn’t the end of Mithridates’ ambition though, and he continued pressuring Bithynia’s lands and realms, continuing to draw the ire of Rome. Eventually, Nicomedes III ordered an invasion of some of Mithridates’ kingdom in retaliation for the continuous aggression. This played right into Mithridates’ hands. Mithridates was seen as a promised savior to the people of Pontus. In the years leading up to the birth of Mithridates, several prophecies in the east had foretold the birth of a savior king. This king would overthrow a great and evil power, and lead to the salvation of the people. This savior’s birth, the prophecies foretold, would be heralded by a great star in the sky. That star appeared as a bright comet crossing the sky around the time of Mithridates birth. The sources say that the comet burned so bright that the sky appeared to be on fire. Now many of you familiar with Christian beliefs will note that this prophecy sound strangely similar to the prophecy of Jesus of Nazareth’s birth. Prophecies of a savior coming to destroy the Roman Empire were popular in the Eastern Provinces and border regions of the Roman Empire who feared the ever growing and encroaching power of Rome upon their lands. Its no surprise that the leaders of Pontus, including Mithridates, latched onto this powerful propaganda weapon in order to legitimize his aggression and expansion into the areas around his kingdom. When Nicomedes III ordered the retaliatory invasion of Pontus, Mithridates put up a token defense and allowed Bythinia to take the lands they were seeking. Mithridates then turned around and used the invasion as evidence of provocation. The fighting continued back and forth between these two kingdoms for some time until finally both rulers appealed to the Roman Republic to settle their disputes as to who would rule which lands. The Senate decided that the claims of the Bythinians were the correct ones and thus ordered Mithridates to cede some lands back to Bythinia. Mithridates accepted this decision and began to think that his kingdom would at least be at peace with its neighbors. But this peace was not meant to last. In 89 BCE, the Roman Legions stationed in Bythinia instigated the newest ruler of Bythinia, Nicomedes IV, to launch another invasion into Pontus. The Bythinians were easily repelled by Mithridates and soon the armies of Pontus were welcomed with open arms by the rest of Anatolia. Feeling betrayed by the Roman Republic, whom he had once considered friends, Mithridates vowed to rid Asia minor of Roman influence and he would start in his own kingdom. The Vespers of 88 BCE had begun. The exact date is unknown, but some time in 88 BCE, Mithridates ordered the execution of every Roman man, woman and child present in Pontus. This was orchestrated on a mass scale, with the executions supposedly all occurring on the same day. An exact number cannot be divined, but it is estimated that between 80,000 to 150,000 people lost their lives in this absolute travesty of human cruelty. But this was not the full measure of Romans present in Anatolia, as many Romans were able to flee before being massacred. Some took refuge in the port of Rhodes, who were one of Rome’s most stalwart allies. Mithridates demanded that Rhodes turn the Romans away and back to Pontus, but Rhodes refused, cementing their status as enemies of Pontus for years. The story of the massacre eventually reached the Roman Senate. Outrage and anger filled the hearts of the people and justice was demanded. The Senate was called into a special session where they declared the Kingdom of Pontus to be an enemy of Rome. The Mithridatic wars between Rome and Pontus had begun. The three Mithridatic wars lasted for the better part of twenty-five years, with a two year treaty between the first and second war and then a six year treaty between the second and the third war. The wars saw Sulla and eventually Pompey the Great engaging in battle against Mithridates. Athens was besieged by the Romans and suffered greatly for their willingness to assist Mithridates. The Treaty of Dardanos, signed in 85 BCE and the treaty that ended the first Mithridatic War, returned the territories and borders of the Roman Republic and the Kingdoms of Anatolia to their pre-war status. It also placed Greece under the protection of Rome. A protection that Greece did not necessarily want, but a protection that Greece could not deny. Athens was forced to pay huge war indemnities and the Greek people lost considerable autonomy and power over their own region. The Second Mithridatic War began just two years later and was heavily slanted in favor of the Kingdom of Pontus. A Roman Legate, Lucius Licinius Murena, was left in charge in Asia minor while Sulla returned to Rome to deal with a civil war that was brewing. Murena attempted to seize the kingdom of Pontus and had succeeded at first in claiming several villages in the name of Rome, attempting to March on Mithridates’ stronghold at modern day Sinop in 81 BCE. The battle turned into a stalemate and the Roman advance was blunted, forcing Murena and his remaining legions to return to Rome in defeat. The victory of Mithridates coupled with domestic problems going on in Rome, put off any further military skirmishes against Pontus for another six years. The third Mithridatic war began in 73 BCE and would prove to be the longest of the three wars and would cause the most profound changes on the Mediteranean region and the influence that Rome had in the East. Upon the death of Nicomedes IV, the Kingdom of Bythinia was given to Rome as a province by the now dead King. Nicomedes considered himself to be in debt to Rome and wished to keep his people safe. The best way to satisfy both his own sense of debt and to protect his people from the ambition of the Pontic Kingdom was to give his lands over to Rome, who had protected his land in times of need. Mithridates could not let this stand and launched a full-scale invasion of Bythinia and Rome responded in kind. The third Mithridatic war raged for a decade and pulled in every major and minor power that called the eastern Mediterranean home. This war was overseen by a number of Roman generals, all of whom were more or less capable leaders who kept Mithridates on the ropes for most of the war. In many of the battles, the Romans would defeat Mithridates, but some major event would happen in Rome, causing the fighting to stop. Mithridates would retreat, and reconsolidate his power, only for the fighting to start back up again. Eventually, the general Pompey the Great, led the Roman forces to victory in Asia Minor. The Kingdom of Pontus was ended, The Kingdom of Armenia, the province of Judea, and Syria all became clients of the Roman Republic. And the area around the Black Sea was cemented as a major center of Roman influence for centuries to come. Eventually King Mithridates met his end after fleeing across the Black Sea. His enemies closed in on him until all King Mithridates could do was ask his loyal and trusted body guard to take his life. Mithridates the VI met his end and saw his kingdom come to an end at the hands of the greatest empire that ever ruled the Mediterranean. Pompey the Great, having gained a lasting respect for the king, ordered his body buried in his kingdom as a sign of respect for his opponent. As the third Mithridatic war ended, it seemed as if Rome was heading toward a stable peace throughout the now vast Empire. But back in Rome, the Republic was slowly crumbling toward Autocracy. While Rome Burns is part of the 1up Podcast Network.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pompey, the Great Husband
    Michael Jaffee Patterson Independent Project 2/1/13 Pompey, the Great Husband Abstract: Pompey the Great’s traditional narrative of one-dimensionally striving for power ignores the possibility of the affairs of his private life influencing the actions of his political career. This paper gives emphasis to Pompey’s familial relationships as a motivating factor beyond raw ambition to establish a non-teleological history to explain the events of his life. Most notably, Pompey’s opposition to the special command of the Lex Gabinia emphasizes the incompatibility for success in both the public and private life and Pompey’s preference for the later. Pompey’s disposition for devotion and care permeates the boundary between the public and private to reveal that the happenings of his life outside the forum defined his actions within. 1 “Pompey was free from almost every fault, unless it be considered one of the greatest faults for a man to chafe at seeing anyone his equal in dignity in a free state, the mistress of the world, where he should justly regard all citizens as his equals,” (Velleius Historiae Romanae 2.29.4). The annals of history have not been kind to Pompey. Characterized by the unbridled ambition attributed as his impetus for pursuing the civil war, Pompey is one of history’s most one-dimensional characters. This teleological explanation of Pompey’s history oversimplifies the entirety of his life as solely motivated by a desire to dominate the Roman state. However, a closer examination of the events surrounding the passage of the Lex Gabinia contradicts this traditional portrayal.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SECOND and THIRD WARS AGAINST ROME Mithridates
    CHAPTER FIVE THE SECOND AND THIRD WARS AGAINST ROME Mithridates got off lightly from the first war: even Sulla's own troops recognised that (Plut. Sult. 24.4). He was simply confined to the ter­ ritories he possessed before the war. Military defeat must have severely damaged his prestige, but the rich resources of his empire would soon enable him to build up his power again. The Jugurthine war had pro­ bably made it clear to the Senate that the only effective neutralisation of a determined native king was death or capture. And the terms of the treaty of Dardanus hardly constituted sufficient revenge for the thousands of Romans and Italians murdered in the Asian Vespers. Even immediately after the war, many must have thought that Rome had unfinished business with Mithridates. Some of the king's Black Sea subjects had taken advantage of his defeat to revolt, and the first thing he did on his return to Pontus was to go to war with these Colchian and Bosporan rebels (App. Mith. 64). 1 The Col­ chians wanted Eupator's son, also called Mithridates, as king, which may imply that they were dissatisfied with the previous administration of their country. When this request was granted they returned to their loyalty. 2 Eupator, however, was suspicious of the young prince and ex­ ecuted him. We do not hear how the Colchians reacted, but presumably another uparchos or dioikitis was sent to govern the region (Strabo 11. 2 .18 c.499). Indeed perhaps it was now that Colchis was transferred to another of the king's sons, Machares, ruler of the Bosporan kingdom, who certainly later on controlled it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Wars and Battles of Ancient Rome
    Wars and Battles of Ancient Rome Battle summaries are from Harbottle's Dictionary of Battles, published by Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1904. Rise of Rome—753 to 3911 B.C. The rise of Rome from a small Latin city to the dominant power in Italy Battle of Description Sabines According to legend, a year after the Romans kidnapped their wives from the neighboring Sabines, the (Kingdom) tribes returned to take vengeance. The fighting however, was stopped by the young wives who ran in B.C. 750 between the warring parties and begged that their fathers, brothers and husbands cease making war upon each other. The Sabine and Roman tribes were henceforth united. Alba Longa After a long siege, Alba was finally taken by strategm. With the fall of Alba, its father-city, Rome was (Kingdom) the undisputed leading city of the Latins. The inhabitants of Alba were resettled in Rome on the caelian B.C. 650 Hill. Sublican Lars Porsenna, king of Clusium was marching toward Rome, planning to restore the exiled Tarquins to Bridge the Roman throne. As his army descended on Rome from the opposite side of the Tiber, roman soldiers (Tarquinii) worked furiously to destroy the wooden bridge. Horatius and two other soldiers single-handedly fended B.C. 509 off Porsenna's army until the bridge could be destroyed. Lake Regillus Fought B.C. 497, the first authentic date in the history of Rome. The details handed down, however, (Tarquinii) belong to the domain of legend rather than to that of history. According to the chroniclers, this was the B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • West Asian Geopolitics and the Roman Triumph A
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Parading Persia: West Asian Geopolitics and the Roman Triumph A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Carly Maris September 2019 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Michele Salzman, Chairperson Dr. Denver Graninger Dr. Thomas Scanlon Copyright by Carly Maris 2019 The Dissertation of Carly Maris is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements Thank you so much to the following people for your continued support: Dan (my love), Mom, Dad, the Bellums, Michele, Denver, Tom, Vanessa, Elizabeth, and the rest of my friends and family. I’d also like to thank the following entities for bringing me joy during my time in grad school: The Atomic Cherry Bombs, my cats Beowulf and Oberon, all the TV shows I watched and fandoms I joined, and my Twitter community. iv ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Parading Persia: West Asian Geopolitics and The Roman Triumph by Carly Maris Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in History University of California, Riverside, September 2019 Dr. Michele Salzman, Chairperson Parading Persia: West Asian Geopolitics and the Roman Triumph is an investigation into East-West tensions during the first 500 years of Roman expansion into West Asia. The dissertation is divided into three case studies that: (1) look at local inscriptions and historical accounts to explore how three individual Roman generals warring with the dominant Asian-Persian empires for control over the region negotiated
    [Show full text]
  • ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons CUREJ - College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal College of Arts and Sciences 5-2011 ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72 Emerson T. Brooking University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Military History Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Brooking, Emerson T., "ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72" 01 May 2011. CUREJ: College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal, University of Pennsylvania, https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/145. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/145 For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72 Abstract This study evaluates the military history and practice of the Roman Empire in the context of contemporary counterinsurgency theory. It purports that the majority of Rome’s security challenges fulfill the criteria of insurgency, and that Rome’s responses demonstrate counterinsurgency proficiency. These assertions are proven by means of an extensive investigation of the grand strategic, military, and cultural aspects of the Roman state. Fourteen instances of likely insurgency are identified and examined, permitting the application of broad theoretical precepts
    [Show full text]
  • 4-7 100-1 B.C. Political History
    World History Chapter 4: 300-1 B.C. Section 7: 100-1 B.C. Political History By Dallin Hardy 1st Century B.C. 100-0 B.C. Rome 1st Century Rome Social War 91-88 B.C. Italian cities vs. Rome Sulla Roman General Marius Sulla Mithridatic Wars 88-63 B.C. Sulla’s March on Rome 88 B.C. First Mithridatic War 89-85 B.C. Marius’ March on Rome 87 B.C. Sulla’s Return 82 B.C. Second March on Rome Sulla 82-81 B.C. Dictator of Rome Proscription of Sulla 82 B.C. Third Servile War 73-71 B.C. Spartacus Led the slave revolt Marcus Licinius Crassus Roman general Gnaeus Pompey Roman general Crucifixion of Spartacus’ Army 71 B.C. Appian Way Suppression of Cilician Pirates 67 B.C. By Pompey Catiline Conspiracy 63 B.C. Cicero Roman statesman Defended Roman Republic Catiline Orations 63 B.C. By Cicero Battle of Pistoria 62 B.C. Roman Republic vs. Catiline Julius Caesar Roman politician & general First Triumvirate 60 B.C. Crassus Pompey Julius Caesar Gallic Wars 58-50 B.C. Rome vs. Gallic tribes Siege of Alesia 52 B.C. Vercingetorix Gallic chieftain Battle of Carrhae 53 B.C. Rome vs. Parthian Empire Dissolution of First Triumvirate 53 B.C. Crossing the Rubicon 49 B.C. Julius Caesar Caesar’s Civil War 49-45 B.C. Optimates vs. Populares Battle of Zela 47 B.C. Julius Caesar Veni, Vidi, Vici Battle of Pharsalus 48 B.C. Assassination of Pompey 48 B.C. Egypt Egypt Cleopatra 51-30 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline1800 18001600
    TIMELINE1800 18001600 Date York Date Britain Date Rest of World 8000BCE Sharpened stone heads used as axes, spears and arrows. 7000BCE Walls in Jericho built. 6100BCE North Atlantic Ocean – Tsunami. 6000BCE Dry farming developed in Mesopotamian hills. - 4000BCE Tigris-Euphrates planes colonized. - 3000BCE Farming communities spread from south-east to northwest Europe. 5000BCE 4000BCE 3900BCE 3800BCE 3760BCE Dynastic conflicts in Upper and Lower Egypt. The first metal tools commonly used in agriculture (rakes, digging blades and ploughs) used as weapons by slaves and peasant ‘infantry’ – first mass usage of expendable foot soldiers. 3700BCE 3600BCE © PastSearch2012 - T i m e l i n e Page 1 Date York Date Britain Date Rest of World 3500BCE King Menes the Fighter is victorious in Nile conflicts, establishes ruling dynasties. Blast furnace used for smelting bronze used in Bohemia. Sumerian civilization developed in south-east of Tigris-Euphrates river area, Akkadian civilization developed in north-west area – continual warfare. 3400BCE 3300BCE 3200BCE 3100BCE 3000BCE Bronze Age begins in Greece and China. Egyptian military civilization developed. Composite re-curved bows being used. In Mesopotamia, helmets made of copper-arsenic bronze with padded linings. Gilgamesh, king of Uruk, first to use iron for weapons. Sage Kings in China refine use of bamboo weaponry. 2900BCE 2800BCE Sumer city-states unite for first time. 2700BCE Palestine invaded and occupied by Egyptian infantry and cavalry after Palestinian attacks on trade caravans in Sinai. 2600BCE 2500BCE Harrapan civilization developed in Indian valley. Copper, used for mace heads, found in Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine and Egypt. Sumerians make helmets, spearheads and axe blades from bronze.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Companion to Strabo Looking in from the Outside
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 27 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK The Routledge Companion to Strabo Daniela Dueck Looking in from the outside Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315696416-3 Jesper Majbom Madsen Published online on: 27 Mar 2017 How to cite :- Jesper Majbom Madsen. 27 Mar 2017, Looking in from the outside from: The Routledge Companion to Strabo Routledge Accessed on: 27 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315696416-3 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 LOOKING IN FROM THE OUTSIDE Strabo’s attitude towards the Roman people Jesper Majbom Madsen This chapter presents Strabo’s perception of Rome, Roman culture and Roman power in general. The geographer himself serves as a striking example of the ambivalent attitudes of Greek intellectuals active from the late first century BCE to the early decades of the first cen- tury CE in the portrayal of the Roman people (here defined as Roman citizens originating from Italy or the city of Rome itself), and the Roman way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman History Timeline
    3/9/2014 ROMAN HISTORY TIMELINE Roman History Timeline by Jim Jones, West Chester University of Pennsylvania (c.2013) Return to the Syllabus This list begins with the founding of the village of Rome around 753 BCE and continues to the fall of Constantinople in 1453 CE. It is particularly detailed for the period from 58 BCE to 31 BCE (Julius Caesar to Caesar Augustus) and for 376 CE to 480 CE (the "fall" of the Western Roman Empire). ROMAN MONARCHY 1200 BCE Etruscans reached northern Italy 800­500 BCE Greeks established colonies throughout southern Italy 800 BCE Phoenicians established Carthage on the north coast of Africa about 753 village of Rome founded BCE 600 BCE Rome was a province of Etruria 509 BCE Romans revolted against the Etruscan kings and created the system of government by the Senate and the Assembly THE CONQUEST OF ITALY 494 BCE first disputes between patricians (wealthy landowners who controlled the Senate) and plebeians (ordinary citizens) 450 BCE "Law of the 12 Tables" provides written Roman law 390 BCE Gaulic invasion sacked Rome 282­272 BCE War with Pyrrhus 265 BCE Rome completed the occupation of the Italian peninsula THE CONQUEST OF THE MEDITERRANEAN 264­241 BCE First war with Carthage (First Punic War) 238 BCE Conquest of Sardinia 229­228 BCE First Illyrian War (Balkans) 219 BCE Second Illyrian War 218­201 BCE Second Punic War (Hannibal crossed the Alps) 215­205 BCE First Macedonian War 200­197 BCE Second Macedonian War 200­191 BCE Gaul invasion of northern Italy 192­189 BCE Syrian War 171­168 Third Macedonian War 149­148 BCE Fourth (and final) Macedonian War 149­146 BCE Third Punic War and final defeat of Carthage THE END OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIC http://courses.wcupa.edu/jones/his101/web/t-roman.htm 1/4 3/9/2014 ROMAN HISTORY TIMELINE 135­132 BCE First Servile War (slave revolt) 133 BCE Tiberius, the first senator to advocate land reform, was assassinated in 133 BCE by land­owners.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03825-7 - The Geography Of Strabo Duane W. Roller Index More information Index Ethnyms may be indexed with their toponyms. Romans are generally listed under their nomen, except for a few (e.g. Cicero, the emperor Tiberius) much better known by another name. Many toponyms in the Geography appear in a number of variants. Often these are significant and represent the history of the name or its form in different languages, but in other cases they may simply indicate differences between Strabo’s sources or even errors. Nevertheless, in the interest of thoroughness and clarity, many variants appear in this index. Moreover, it is not always possible to determine whether repeated mentions of the same toponym in the same region are identical or different places. Aarassos, 545 Achaia Aba, Phokaian city, 435 in Aria, 497 Aba, queen of Olbe, 25, 633 in the Kaukasos, 479 Abaeitians, 593 in the Peloponnesos, 323, 364, 379, 381, 385, 441 Abai, 415 in Thessaly, 422 Abantians, 435 Roman province, 777 Abantis, 435 Achaian Argos, 363, 367 Abaris, 297 Achaian camp, 567 Abas, 422 Achaian Cape, 642 Abdera Achaian council, 380 Iberian city, 169 Achaian Federation, 373 Thracian city, 330, 510, 527, 609 Achaian Phthiotians, 421 Abderos, 330 Achaian Phthiotis, 74 Abeakos, 489 Achaian Wall, 122 Abella, 250 Achaians, 261, 262, 338, 340, 343, 364, 370, 381, Abians, 39, 292, 293, 295, 296, 298, 530 422, 424, 455 Abile, 766 Achaiion, 568, 574, 575 Abilyx, 180 Achaikaros, 711 Abisares, 655 Achaimenidians, 681 Abonouteichos, 523 Achaios,
    [Show full text]
  • A Reassessment of Warlordism in the First Phase of the Mithridatic Wars
    Sulla, the Army, the Officers and the poleis of Greece: A Reassessment of Warlordism in the First Phase of the Mithridatic Wars Sophia Zoumbaki In 87 BC, Sulla crossed the Adriatic in the capacity of proconsul, entrusted with the task of vanquishing the King of Pontus, Mithridates VI Eupator. Five le- gions, a few cohorts and the cavalry accompanied him.1 In order to secure sup- plies of cash, the senators resorted to a desperate solution. They voted to seize and sell the sacred treasure supposedly donated by the legendary King Numa, in order to finance sacrifices to the gods. The sale of this precious ancient trea- sure, however, yielded only nine thousand pounds of gold. But, τοσήδε μὲν ἦν τότε πάντων ἀπορία καὶ ἐς πάντα φιλοτιμία, ‘so limited were their means at the time, and so unlimited their ambition’.2 Shortly afterwards, in 86 BC, when the balance of power in Rome enabled L. Cornelius Cinna to gain control, supplies for Sulla’s army were cut off, Sulla was declared a public enemy (hostis), and command was transferred to the con- sul Marius.3 After Marius’s unexpected death, the consul suffectus L. Valerius Flaccus replaced him, took over the governorship of Asia and was sent out to the East. Although Memnon mentions that Flaccus was ordered to cooperate with Sulla, this seems difficult given that Sulla was a hostis and he would not readily compromise and consent to being replaced by Flaccus or allow him to win the glory of the victor over Mithridates.4 Moreover, Sulla felt that this army was not in fact directed against Rome’s chief enemy but against him person- ally, λόγῳ μὲν ἐπὶ Μιθριδάτην, ἔργῳ δὲ ἐπ’ ἐκεῖνον αὐτὸν (Plut.
    [Show full text]