STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FISCAL YEAR 2016
Prepared: October 2016 By TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Decision Support: Research and Planning Division
The Tennessee Department of Correction Fiscal Year 2015 – 2016 Statistical Abstract Coordinated and Published by
Decision Support: Research & Planning Division
Tanya Washington, Director Tim Oliver, Program Support Coordinator
To request a copy of this report, or other research information, contact us at Telephone: 615-253-8187 Email: [email protected] Visit the TDOC website: www.tn.gov/correction
Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy on nondiscrimination, the Department of Correction does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, age, veteran’s status, disability, pregnancy, creed and genetic information in its policies, or in the admission of or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs, services, or activities.
Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, EEO/AA Coordinator, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423.
ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423.
TABLE OF CONTENTS BUDGET & STAFFING Personnel by Race and Sex 9 Personnel by Class 9 Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates 10 Correctional Officer Series 11 Authorized Full Time Equivalents (FTE'S) 11 Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population 12 Salary Comparisons 13 Correctional Officer Turnover Rate 14 Probation/Parole Officer Series Vacancy Rates 15 Probation/Parole Officer Series 15 Authorized Full Time Equivalents (FTE'S) 16 Probation/Parole Officer Turnover Rate 16 Budget Recommendations by Function of Government 17 POPULATION, CAPACITY & TRENDS Institutional Capacity & Population Distribution 21 Operating Capacity v. Inmate Population Projections 22 Total Incarcerated Felon Population (Historical and Projected) 22 Total Incarcerated Felon Population 23 Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Inmate Population Trends 23 Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Sex 24 Felony Inmate Population by Age 25 Felony Inmate Population by Sex and Race 26 Felony Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location 26 Local Jail Census 27 Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense (In-house Population Detail) 28 Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense (Admissions) 29 Average Time Served by Primary Offense (Releases by Location) 30 Average Time Served by Primary Offense (Releases by Type) 31 Yearly Inmate Admissions and Releases 32 Felony Inmate Admissions by Type 32 Felony Inmate Releases by Type 32 Felony Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex 33 Felony Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex 33 Inmate Admissions by Geographical Region 34 Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction 35 Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction 36 Total Community Supervision Felon Population 37 Community Supervision Population by Age 38 Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type 39 Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex 40 Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex 40 Community Supervision Admissions and Releases 41 Community Supervision Releases by Type 41
TABLE OF CONTENTS OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY, PROGRAMS & SERVICES Total Hours and Estimated Value of Inmate Community Service Work 45 Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work by Community Supervision 45 Inmate Program Assignments 46 Inmate Drug Screens 47 Inmate Educational Enrollment 48 Inmate Education Test Results 48 GED & Vocational Certificates 48 Chronic Disease Clinic Caseload 49 5-Year Analysis of Hospital Admissions 50 Behavioral Health Services 50 Mental Health Level of Care II 51 Quality Assurance 52 Offender Development and Rehabilitation 52 INSTITUTIONS (DEMOGRAPHICS) Facility and Probation/Parole Office Locations 55 Prison Security Designations 56 Inmate Population Custody Levels 56 Average Daily Population 56 Demographics by Facility 57 Facility Populations by Primary Offense 58 Incidents: FY 2014 - 2015 58 Incident Summary 59 Demographics of Parolees 62 Demographics of Probationers 63 Community Supervision Offenders Levels of Supervision 64 Statistical Abstract User's Guide 67
Budget and Staffing
Budget & Staffing 9
The Central Office Human Resources section provides technical assistance and advice and ensures compliance with Civil Service Rules, EEOC/Affirmative Action, state law, and policies. This section also implements and monitors personnel-related programs such as employee relations, recruitment and retention, training, performance evaluations, employee transactions, and employee benefits, including accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Personnel by Race and Sex: June 30, 2016
Male Female Total White 2,813 1,523 4,336 Black 598 861 1,459 American Indian 12 6 18 Asian 12 10 22 Hispanic 43 25 68 Other 14 15 29 Total 3,492 2,440 5,932
Personnel by Class: June 30, 2016
Personnel Type FY15-16 FY14-15 FY13-14 FY12-13 FY11-12 FY10-11 FY09-10 FY08-09 FY07-08 FY06-07 FY05-06 Officials/ 2.6% 2.5% 2.3% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% 2.3% 2.2% 2.0% Administrators Security 56.3% 54.1% 56.5% 54.8% 65.3% 65.4% 64.7% 65.3% 64.0% 64.3% 64.4% Maintenance 2.9% 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 4.0% 4.1% 4.4% 4.4% 4.3% 4.3% 4.4% Professional 28.4% 29.5% 27.5% 28.5% 16.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.1% 16.5% 16.3% 16.1% Skilled 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.7% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% Clerical 6.4% 6.9% 6.6% 6.7% 6.2% 6.2% 6.5% 6.8% 7.4% 7.4% 7.5% 1.5% 1.8% 1.8% 2.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.6% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.5% Technical
10 2016 Statistical Abstract
VACANCIES IN SECURITY STAFF
Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates from 2016
As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate
7/1/2016 246 3476 7.1% 7/1/2015 335 3,479 9.6% 7/1/2014 266 3,712 7.2% 7/1/2013 308 3,705 8.3% 7/1/2012 135 3,408 4.0%
7/1/2011 125 3,389 3.7%
7/1/2010 112 3,360 3.3% 7/1/2009 143 3,360 4.3% 7/1/2008 173 3,491 5.0% 7/1/2007 94 3,356 2.8%
7/1/2006 73 3,340 2.2% 7/1/2005 55 3,335 1.6%
Budget & Staffing 11
Correctional Officer Series June 30, 2016
Correctional Correctional Clerical
Positions Officer Officer Corporal Sergeant Lieutenant Captain TOTAL
2,570 132 459 180 77 58 3,476 Total Filled 2,380 127 418 173 76 56 3,230
AUTHORIZED FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE'S) in FY 2015 - 2016
Facility Security Non-Security Total Bledsoe County Correctional Complex 506 197 703 DeBerry Special Needs Facility 262 170 432
Mark Luttrell Correctional Complex 96 55 151 Morgan County Correctional Complex 513 172 685 Northeast Correctional Complex 374 146 520
Northwest Correctional Complex 397 180 577 Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 276 60 336 Tennessee Correction Academy 1 66 67 Tennessee Prison for Women 151 61 212
Turney Center Industrial Complex 296 120 416 West Tennessee State Penitentiary 394 154 548 Facility Subtotal 3266 1381 4647
Central Office 1 226 227
Total 3267 1607 4874
% of Total 67% 33% 100%
12 2016 Statistical Abstract
STAFFING TRENDS
Correctional facility staffing trends are presented in the graph above. They include data on total facility staffing (expressed in FTEs or full time equivalents) and uniformed security staffing levels as compared to the average daily inmate population.
Between FY 2006 and FY 2016:
Inmate average daily population increased by 4.6% Total facility staffing decreased by 8.2% Total uniformed security staffing decreased by 12.4%.
Budget & Staffing 13
SALARY COMPARISONS
The ability to recruit and retain qualified staff continues to be a concern for the Department. Because salary levels are critical in recruitment and retention of staff, the Department closely monitors other correctional and law enforcement agencies to compare its salaries with those offered by agencies performing similar functions.
Average Starting State DOC Salary
When compared to neighboring state correctional departments, Arkansas $30,135 TDOC ranks 6th in the average starting salary for correctional North Carolina $29,826 officers. Of the 15 states participating in the Southern Missouri $29,652 Legislative Conference, Tennessee places 8th – with an average starting salary slightly above the SLC Alabama $28,516 average of $27,139.
Virginia $28,035 Source: Southern Legislative Conference – July 2015 Tennessee $27,329 (July 1, 2016)
Kentucky $26,400
Georgia $26,322
Mississippi $22,006
Federal Bureau of Prisons $39,858 TDOC also ranks low when compared to other correctional and law enforcement agencies located Shelby County Sheriff’s Office $35,454 near some of our facilities. These are some of the agencies with whom we compete directly in the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office $38,097 recruitment and retention of uniformed staff. Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office $32,090
Knox County Sheriff’s Office $30,813
14 2016 Statistical Abstract
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TURNOVER RATES FY 2016
Correctional Officer Institution Series Turnover Rate
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex BCCX 36.7%
DeBerry Special Needs Facility DSNF 35.2%
Mark Luttrell Correctional Facility MLCC 26.8%
Morgan County Correctional Complex MCCX 35.6%
Northeast Correctional Complex NECX 17.1%
Northwest Correctional Complex NWCX 46.8%
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution RMSI 44.0%
Tennessee Prison for Women TPFW 61.2%
Turney Center Industrial Complex TCIX 31.8%
West Tennessee State Penitentiary WTSP 34.2%
Systemwide 36.2%
In FY 2016, the correctional officer turnover rate was 36.2% systemwide. The turnover rate includes all officers leaving positions, but excludes those occurring when an employee is transferred or promoted within the TDOC system in the correctional or probation/parole officer series.
Budget & Staffing 15
Probation/Parole Officer Series 2016 Vacancy Rate
As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate 7/1/2016 33 748 4.4% 7/1/2015 36 754 4.8% 7/1/2014 41 790 5.2% 7/1/2013 34 793 4.3%
Probation/Parole Officer Series June 30, 2016
Vacancy Positions PPO2 PPO3 TOTAL Rate
Total 627 121 748 4.4% Filled 601 114 715
Offender population source: TN Felon Population Update (June 2016) 16 2016 Statistical Abstract
AUTHORIZED FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE'S) FY 2015 - 2016
Security Non-Security Total District 10 56 15 71 District 20 58 14 72 District 21 32 9 41 District 30 77 21 98 District 31 29 7 36 District 40 41 9 50 District 41 33 12 45 District 42 40 12 52 District 50 43 14 57 District 51 35 10 45 District 60 33 9 42 District 61 37 14 51 District 70 28 13 41 District 71 24 9 33 District 72 47 12 59 District 80 33 11 44 District 81 31 7 38 Total Districts 677 198 875 % of Total 77% 23% 100%
Community Supervision Turnover Rate FY 2016
Community Probation/Parole Officer Supervision District Turnover Rate
District 10 5.4% District 20 13.8% District 21 21.9% District 30 19.5% District 31 3.4% District 40 17.1% District 41 27.3% District 42 17.5% District 50 34.9% District 51 20.0% District 60 3.0% District 61 5.4% District 70 7.1% District 71 12.5% District 72 17.0% District 80 15.2% District 81 9.7%
Systemwide 15.2%
Budget & Staffing 17
TDOC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STATE BUDGET
FY 2015 - 2016 Total Budget Recommendations By Function of Government
The State of Tennessee's Budget included $31.6 billion in recommended funding allocated by "functional area." Total funding budgeted for the Department of Correction in FY 2016 was $926,444,400.
Population, Capacity, and Trends
Population, Capacity, & Trends 21
TDOC INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY & POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
Population as a Percent of TDOC Assigned Total Beds INSTITUTION Operating Count as of Available Capacity 6/30/2016 Available Operating Beds Capacity GENERAL PURPOSE FACILITIES Bledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Female 300 294 297 99.0% 101.0% Hardeman County Correctional Center (HCCF) 2,100 1,976 1,991 94.8% 100.8% Mark Luttrell Correctional Center (MLCC) 454 445 428 94.3% 96.2% Northeast Correctional Complex (NECX) 1,880 1,842 1,788 95.1% 97.1% Northwest Correctional Complex (NWCX) 2,436 2,387 2,355 96.7% 98.7%
South Central Correctional Facility (SCCF) 1,700 1,642 1,657 97.5% 100.9%
Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex (TTCC) 2,672 2,619 1,701 63.7% 64.9% Turney Center Industrial Complex (TCIX) 1,734 1,699 1,593 91.9% 93.8% Whiteville Correctional Facility (WCFA) 1,619 1,505 1,521 93.9% 101.1% SUB-TOTAL 14,895 14,409 13,331 89.5% 92.5% CLASSIFICATION FACILITIES Bledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Male 2,239 2,194 2,155 96.2% 98.2% Tennessee Prison for Women (TPFW) 817 801 797 97.6% 99.5% SUB-TOTAL 3,056 2,995 2,952 96.6% 98.6% SPECIAL PURPOSE FACILITIES DeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) 854 786 668 78.2% 85.0% SUB-TOTAL 854 786 668 78.2% 85.0%
HIGH SECURITY FACILITIES
Morgan County Correctional Complex (MCCX) 2,294 2,225 2,233 97.3% 100.4%
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) 808 784 787 97.4% 100.4% West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP) 974 945 831 85.3% 87.9% SUB-TOTAL 4,076 3,954 3,851 94.5% 97.4% TOTALS 22,881 22,144 20,802 90.9% 93.9% Source: TDOC Population Overview Report.
.
22 2016 Statistical Abstract
TDOC OPERATING CAPACITY COMPARED TO INMATE POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Unmet Fiscal Year End Operating Projected Bed June 30th Capacity Population Demand 2017 22,144 29,514 7,370 2018 22,144 29,720 7,576 2019 22,144 30,537 8,393
2020 22,144 31,002 8,858
Population, Capacity, & Trends 23
FELON POPULATION TRENDS
The felon population data included in this Statistical Abstract is from the Tennessee Offender Management Information System (TOMIS) unless otherwise stated. Data from other sources may vary from TOMIS due to the time delay in the TOMIS data entry process. The data on this page and page 24 are from TDOC monthly population reports.
Total Incarcerated Felon Population: June 30, 2016
County/Local Jails
Locally Sentenced 3,841 TDOC Backup 4,719
TDOC Prisons 20,802
TOTAL 29,362 Source: Tennessee Felon Population Update
.
24 2016 Statistical Abstract
Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population Trends
Over the past 12 fiscal years (2005 - 2016), the incarcerated felon population (including TDOC backup and locally sentenced felons) has increased 12.0% (from 26,209 to 29,362). The male and female felon population increased 8.9% (from 24,251 to 26,421) and 50.2% (from 1,958 to 2,941) respectively during this same period. During the past fiscal year, the total incarcerated felon population increased from 29,263 in June 2015 to 29,362 in June 2016, an increase of 0.3%. The male felon population decreased 0.5% and the female felon population increased 8.6% during FY 2016.
Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population: FY 2005 - 2016
Population, Capacity, & Trends 25
FELONY INMATE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, RACE
Felony Inmate Population by Age (Systemwide) June 30, 2016
Felony Inmate Population by Age: June 30, 2016
TDOC TDOC LOCAL % % % SYSTEMWIDE % INHOUSE BACKUP FELON 65+ 523 2.5% 32 0.5% 21 0.7% 576 1.9% 60-64 587 2.8% 77 1.2% 39 1.3% 703 2.3%
55-59 1,085 5.2% 154 2.5% 103 3.4% 1,342 4.5%
50-54 1,646 7.9% 322 5.2% 180 6.0% 2,148 7.2% 45-49 2,153 10.4% 560 9.0% 189 6.3% 2,902 9.7% 40-44 2,613 12.6% 733 11.8% 280 9.3% 3,626 12.1% 35-39 3,343 16.1% 1,095 17.6% 380 12.6% 4,818 16.1% 30-34 3,405 16.4% 1,240 20.0% 496 16.5% 5,141 17.2% 25-29 3,345 16.1% 1,247 20.1% 605 20.1% 5,197 17.3% 20-24 1,941 9.4% 720 11.6% 652 21.7% 3,313 11.1% 18-19 98 0.5% 25 0.4% 55 1.8% 178 0.6%
<18 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 0.0%
Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 5 0.2% 6 0.0%
TOTAL 20,744 100% 6,206 100% 3,005 100% 29,955 100% Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
.
26 2016 Statistical Abstract
Felony Inmate Population by Sex and Race (Systemwide) June 30, 2016
Female 10% White 55%
Black Male 43% 90%
Other 2%
Felony Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location June 30, 2016
TDOC % Backup % Local % Systemwide Male Black 8,977 46.7% 1,327 26.3% 1,746 68.0% 12,050 White 9,721 50.6% 3,650 72.3% 761 29.6% 14,132 Asian 50 0.3% 5 0.1% 0 0.0% 55 Hispanic 452 2.4% 62 1.2% 56 2.2% 570 Native American 25 0.1% 5 0.1% 3 0.1% 33 Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 2
Total Male 19,225 100.0% 5,050 100.0% 2,567 100.0% 26,842
Female Black 394 25.9% 88 7.6% 154 35.2% 636 White 1,098 72.3% 1,067 92.3% 277 63.2% 2,442 Asian 4 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.2% 5 Hispanic 18 1.2% 1 0.1% 5 1.1% 24 Native American 5 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.2% 6 Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0
Total Female 1,519 100.0% 1,156 100.0% 438 100.0% 3,113
TOTAL 20,744 68.4% 6,206 21.2% 3,005 10.0% 29,955 Population, Capacity, & Trends 27
LOCAL JAIL CENSUS
876 633 2.2% 3.0% 3,841 4,719 4,708 9,917 4,496 JUNE JUNE 13.2% 16.2% 16.1% 34.0% 15.4% 29,190 845 630 M AY M AY 2.2% 2.9% 3,779 4,759 4,640 9,686 4,961 12.9% 16.2% 15.8% 33.1% 16.9% 29,300 619 APR APR 2.1% 3.8% 3,838 4,850 4,749 9,656 4,147 13.2% 16.7% 16.4% 33.3% 14.3% 28,973 1,114 665 957 2.3% 3.3% M AR M AR 3,833 5,013 4,454 9,783 4,156 13.3% 17.4% 15.4% 33.9% 14.4% 28,861 632 911 FEB FEB 2.2% 3.2% 3,783 5,114 4,265 9,635 4,191 13.3% 17.9% 14.9% 33.8% 14.7% 28,531 578 900 JAN JAN 2.1% 3.2% 3,648 5,036 4,288 9,590 4,099 13.0% 17.9% 15.2% 34.1% 14.6% 28,139 526 927 DEC DEC 1.9% 3.4% 3,672 5,218 4,126 9,269 3,706 13.4% 19.0% 15.0% 33.8% 13.5% 27,444 617 861 NOV NOV 2.2% 3.1% 3,837 5,247 4,376 9,307 3,904 13.6% 18.6% 15.5% 33.1% 13.9% 28,149 638 866 2.2% 3.0% OCT OCT 3,828 5,159 4,675 9,462 4,137 13.3% 17.9% 16.3% 32.9% 14.4% 28,765 651 881 2.3% 3.1% 3,929 5,110 4,728 9,358 4,011 SEPT SEPT 13.7% 17.8% 16.5% 32.6% 14.0% 28,668 Local Jail Census: FY 2015 - 2016 2015 - FY Census: Jail Local 636 926 AU G AU G 2.2% 3.2% 3,895 4,967 4,750 9,350 4,036 13.6% 17.4% 16.6% 32.7% 14.1% 28,560 619 895 2.2% 3.2% 3,875 4,990 4,821 9,027 3,759 JULY JULY 13.8% 17.8% 17.2% 32.3% 13.4% 27,986 TDOC Jail Summary Report as of June 30, 2016 Felony Misdemeanant Felony Misdemeanant Local FelonsLocal Other Convicted Felons FelonsLocal Other Convicted Felons Total Population Jail TDOC Backup Convicted Misdemeanants Others Pre-trial Detainees Percentage of Jail Population TDOC Backup Convicted Misdemeanants Others Pre-trial Detainees Source:
.
28 2016 Statistical Abstract
Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense In-house Population Detail
N/A N/A 8.51 4.19 1.80 5.39 6.80 3.74 8.09 5.46 6.39 8.67 4.53 7.40 5.66 13.14 28.14 18.03 13.74 16.84 13.02 15.78 19.33 10.36 12.93 24.19 24.96
(YEARS) AVERAGE SENTENCE 100% 1.04% 1.02% 1.54% 0.06% 9.43% 0.68% 0.38% 0.38% 2.09% 6.65% 9.09% 2.92% 7.25% 0.72% 0.38% 0.56% 0.86% 0.05% 5.90% 0.74% 18.21% 13.37% 12.45% 10.44% 12.72% 26.01% 55.04% % OF WIDE
SYSTEM - SYSTEMWIDE 0 0 18 16 64 114 114 114 312 215 169 461 204 627 874 306 259 1,991 3,811 3,128 2,173 1,768 2,261 1,583 4,004 2,825 3,728 2,724 4,784 29,955 OF NUMBER OFFENDERS N/A N/A 5.71 4.19 3.21 5.14 4.41 1.75 7.00 4.00 6.09 4.43 4.82 2.72 4.64 3.68 6.84 6.54 4.70 7.20 3.25 6.79 4.87 3.39 3.90 7.87 (YEARS) AVERAGE SENTENCE 100% 0.13% 0.10% 3.19% 0.17% 1.23% 0.23% 0.87% 0.70% 0.87% 0.27% 2.60% 4.33% 5.32% 0.40% 0.23% 0.87% 0.70% 0.00% 8.69% 0.00% 0.00% 15.41% 11.05% 18.27% 10.55% 15.07% 98.77%
% OF LOCALLY SENTENCED 4 3 7 8 5 7 0 0 0 5 21 12 21 26 26 96 78 26 317 130 160 261 463 549 332 453 400 3,005 LOCALLY SENTENCED
OF NUMBER
OFFENDERS N/A N/A 3.21 8.81 4.01 6.19 6.13 1.80 3.50 7.94 9.00 3.44 6.38 5.80 4.78 6.89 9.89 3.60 4.78 5.50 3.25 3.77 11.07 10.73 12.53 14.93 25.94 (YEARS)
AVERAGE SENTENCE
100% 1.10% 0.10% 1.92% 3.13% 1.55% 0.19% 0.64% 0.27% 9.46% 0.84% 0.34% 4.77% 2.67% 7.06% 0.56% 0.90% 0.35% 0.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.84% 8.40% 13.21% 11.52% 14.89% 23.78% 90.76% % OF TDOC BACKUP TDOC BACKUP 6 0 9 17 21 12 40 68 52 35 56 22 46 96 90 119 194 166 715 587 924 296 820 438 973 1,476 6,206 OF
NUMBER OFFENDERS 7.11 N/A N/A 9.21 8.13 1.92 5.24 8.20 8.96 9.74 11.15 6.00 9.33 7.00 18.98 16.07 15.86 10.52 17.63 14.56 17.03 20.18 14.53 16.69 28.22 25.87 24.38 Population: Inmate Felony (YEARS) AVERAGE SENTENCE 100% 1.13% 1.39% 0.17% 0.41% 4.12% 1.34% 2.91% 0.04% 0.55% 7.98% 2.79% 7.59% 9.66% 0.84% 0.22% 0.47% 0.68% 0.02% 3.82% 0.04% 0.89% 12.91% 11.82% 31.21% 19.09% 12.92% 64.99% % OF TDOC
INHOUSE 9 4 8 TDOC INHOUSE 36 85 46 97 64 115 175 142 210 288 235 854 578 277 792 1,655 1,575 3,960 2,680 2,678 2,452 2,003 2,252 4,689 20,744 OF FY 2016 Offense: 2015 - Primary by TotalAverage Sentence Length NUMBER OFFENDERS
Other Assault
PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP Homicide Murder Negligent Manslaughter Kidnapping Sex Offenses Forcible Non-Forcible Assault Aggravated Assault Arson Burglary Forgery/Fraud Larceny/Theft Robbery Aggravated Robbery All Other Robbery Drug Offenses Cocaine Other Drug Offenses Vehicular Vehicular Homicide/DUI All Other Vehicular C/S/F Person C/S/F Property C/S/F Societal/Drugs Escape All Other Unsentenced TOTAL Sentence Type Death Life 85% 1-2 Years
PERSON PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL OTHER
* 2,325 offenders with sentences of death (64), and life (2,261) are included in the TDOC counts; however, these offenders are not included in calculation of average sentence lengths.
Population, Capacity, & Trends 29
Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense Admissions
0
N/A N/A 3.43 1.79 3.63 6.99 2.69 5.63 5.59 4.06 4.22 6.74 6.13 2.78 4.39 6.25 3.86 3.57 6.51 24.56 19.12 12.43 13.50 12.44 10.43 13.23 12.62 (Years) Average Average Sentence
100% Total 0.02% 1.70% 0.16% 0.58% 3.18% 0.39% 2.87% 1.02% 1.01% 0.37% 4.56% 4.42% 3.34% 6.39% 0.41% 1.01% 0.54% 0.93% 1.17% 0.08% 0.00% 20.51% 10.98% 14.85% 13.28% 20.13% 10.39% % Of System Of System % SYSTEMWIDE
3 0 20 72 49 46 51 67 10 213 398 359 128 126 571 553 418 800 127 116 147 2,567 1,375 1,859 1,663 2,520 1,300 Total 12,518 System-wide
0 N/A N/A 6.33 4.00 0.00 1.72 4.00 4.42 3.26 4.29 2.09 3.81 3.96 2.94 2.88 6.70 4.49 5.93 3.93 8.67 2.33 5.42 4.15 3.59 0.00 2.53 3.76 (Years) Average Average Sentence
100% Total 0.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.09% 0.00% 0.14% 1.17% 1.08% 1.08% 0.47% 4.91% 2.15% 4.72% 4.11% 0.14% 0.70% 0.28% 1.36% 1.08% 0.00% 0.00% 30.95% 17.39% 20.06% 16.22% 10.61% 11.73% Of% Local
SENTENCED LOCALLY 3 0 0 0 2 3 3 6 0 0 25 23 31 10 46 88 15 29 23 662 372 429 105 347 101 227 251 2,139 Offenders Number of
0 N/A N/A 3.36 1.81 3.71 8.00 2.89 6.14 6.08 4.31 4.58 7.46 6.35 2.84 4.48 1.19 3.86 3.81 7.08 24.94 Felony Admissions Felony 12.98 19.12 14.17 12.96 10.99 13.51 13.33 (Years) Average Average Sentence
100% 2.02% Total 0.03% 0.69% 0.17% 3.83% 0.44% 3.22% 1.01% 9.66% 1.08% 0.35% 4.49% 4.88% 3.05% 6.86% 0.46% 1.08% 0.59% 0.84% 1.19% 0.10% 0.00% 18.35% 13.78% 12.68% 22.09% 10.11%
Of TDOC% TDOC SENTENCED 3 0 72 18 46 95 36 48 61 87 10 210 398 334 105 466 507 317 712 112 124 1003 1049 1,905 1,430 1,316 2,293
10,379 Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense Group: FY 2016 2015 - Group: Offense Primary by Sentence Length Average Offenders Number of
GROUP Other Assault PRIMARY OFFENSE PRIMARY Homicide Murder Sentence Type Death Life Negligent Manslaughter Kidnapping 85% Years 1-2 Sex Offenses Forcible Non-Forcible Assault Assault Aggravated Arson Burglary Forgery/Fraud Larceny/Theft Robbery Robbery Aggravated All Other Robbery Offenses Drug Cocaine Other Offenses Drug Vehicular Vehicular Homicide/DUI All Other Vehicular C/S/F Person* C/S/F Property* C/S/F Societal/Drugs* Escape All Other Unknown TOTAL***
PROPERTY PROPERTY SOCIETAL OTHER PERSON
* C/S/F refers offenses non-substantive to such conspiracy, as solicitation, facilitation, aiding, and abetting, etc. 316 unprocessed orders judgment -- admissions: total 12,834. 72 offenders life with sentences and 3 offenders sentence a death are with included counts, in are TDOC but the included not in calculation the of sentence average lengths.
.
30 2016 Statistical Abstract
Average Time Served by Primary Offense Releases by Location
0.00 4.57 2.65 3.51 3.65 3.81 9.12 2.29 6.57 6.65 3.60 4.43 9.29 3.14 2.98 4.77 4.09 2.11 2.86 4.74 2.39 10.00 10.27 17.87 Time (Years) Served Average Average
0.00% 9.74% 0.11% 1.11% 0.99% 0.49% 1.00% 0.36% 8.31% 3.26% 4.25% 4.63% 0.41% 0.96% 0.83% 2.97% 0.37% 0.15% 1.52% 100.0% 19.54% 13.02% 15.64% 10.34% %
SYSTEMWIDE 0 15 68 50 58 52 21 155 139 140 456 595 647 134 116 416 213 1,363 2,733 1,162 1,821 2,187 1,446 13,987 Offenders Number of
2.61 1.89 0.00 2.60 3.63 3.42 1.99 0.00 2.75 3.72 2.78 3.77 2.13 2.37 6.03 2.63 1.81 2.50 1.65 4.97 3.94 1.40 4.12 Time (Years) Served Served Average
0.00% 0.00% 1.58% 1.34% 0.25% 0.53% 0.00% 7.25% 4.47% 1.65% 4.26% 0.32% 1.34% 0.81% 1.34% 0.18% 0.18% 0.46% 100.0% 10.80% 15.20% 15.31% 19.04% 13.72% % 0 7 0 9 5 5 45 38 15 47 38 23 38 13 307 432 206 127 435 121 541 390 LOCALLY SENTENCED 2,842 Offenders Number of
0.00 3.37 2.21 3.22 3.09 3.09 7.76 1.89 5.55 3.11 6.34 3.90 6.82 2.70 2.87 3.52 3.14 3.58 2.05 2.09 7.17 4.18 1.73 8.08 Time (Years) Served Served
Average
0.00% 0.17% 1.11% 1.06% 0.19% 1.62% 0.29% 6.37% 2.25% 1.78% 6.01% 0.39% 8.04% 1.30% 1.01% 1.55% 0.09% 0.12% 0.29% 100.0% 11.70% 24.62% 14.75% 15.30% %
TDOC BACKUP 0 5 7 10 65 62 11 95 17 23 76 59 91 17 685 373 132 864 104 896 352 471 5,857 1,442 Felony Releases Releases Felony
Offenders Number of
6.91 0.00 4.06 4.15 5.51 5.13 3.69 4.81 7.06 7.83 5.82 4.12 5.77 4.18 5.66 7.12 2.93 4.99 3.34 10.10 10.45 11.51 11.75 19.72 Time (Years) Served Served Average 0.00% 7.02% 0.09% 0.85% 0.74% 0.95% 0.57% 0.62% 3.73% 9.87% 8.40% 3.29% 0.49% 0.38% 5.43% 0.64% 0.79% 0.17% 3.46% 100.0% 16.24% 11.02% 14.18% 11.06% % FY 2016 2015 - TimeAverage Location: Served by TDOC INHOUSE 0 5 9 45 39 50 30 33 26 20 34 42 371 859 583 197 522 444 750 174 585 287 183 5,288 Offenders Number of
All Other Vehicular Other All Other Drug Offenses Other Drug Vehicular Homicide/DUI Vehicular Cocaine Offenses Cocaine All Other Robbery Aggravated Robbery Othe r Assa ult Non-Forcible Forcible Negligent Manslaughter Murder TOTAL Unknown All Other All Esca pe C/S/F Societal/Drugs C/S/F C/S/F Property C/S/F Person Vehicular Drug Offenses Drug Larceny/Theft Robbery Burglary Forgery/Fraud Arson Assa ult Aggravated Assault Sex Offenses Sex Kidnapping
Homicide Primary Offense Category Offense Primary
PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL
OTHER
time doesAverage served not include six modified (6) judgement orders. Total releases 13,993. are
Population, Capacity, & Trends 31
Average Time Served by Primary Offense Releases by Type
4.57 2.65 3.51 3.65 3.81 9.12 2.29 6.57 3.60 6.65 4.43 9.29 2.98 3.14 4.09 4.77 2.11 4.74 2.86 2.39 10.00 10.27 17.87
Time Average Served (Years) Served
% 0.00% 9.74% 0.11% 1.11% 0.99% 0.49% 1.00% 0.36% 8.31% 3.26% 4.25% 4.63% 0.41% 0.96% 0.83% 2.97% 0.37% 0.15% 1.52% 19.54% 13.02% 15.64% 10.34% 100.00% SYSTEMWIDE 0 15 68 50 58 52 21 155 139 140 456 595 647 134 116 416 213 1,363 2,733 1,162 1,821 2,187 1,446 13,987 Offenders Number of 2.53 0.00 2.18 0.00 1.75 1.72 2.83 1.78 3.40 2.53 3.33 2.66 3.90 2.55 2.35 2.49 2.87 1.39 2.31 2.97 2.90 0.00 0.50 0.00 (Years) Served Average Time Time Average
% 0.00% 8.52% 0.00% 1.31% 0.56% 0.28% 0.56% 0.09% 2.53% 0.28% 4.87% 0.37% 0.66% 7.68% 0.28% 0.09% 0.00% 0.19% 0.00% 29.96% 10.49% 12.55% 18.73% 100.00% COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS 0 0 6 3 6 1 3 4 7 3 1 0 2 0 91 14 27 52 82 320 112 134 200 1,068 Offenders Number of 2.55 0.00 1.86 1.23 2.79 3.45 2.77 1.31 4.90 2.41 5.21 3.80 5.27 1.87 2.05 2.60 2.02 1.79 2.80 1.86 6.95 6.70 1.40 5.38 (Years) Served Time Average % 0.00% 0.11% 1.33% 1.30% 0.19% 1.76% 0.13% 5.16% 1.86% 0.85% 5.99% 0.32% 1.92% 8.25% 1.20% 2.29% 0.16% 0.11% 0.11% 15.28% 19.48% 18.55% 13.65% 100.00% PROBATION 0 4 7 5 6 4 4 50 49 66 70 32 12 72 45 86 574 732 194 697 225 513 310 3757 Offenders Number of 6.82 0.00 2.59 0.00 0.60 0.40 0.00 2.05 0.00 2.97 7.25 2.54 2.75 3.19 5.56 3.40 4.20 4.90 4.15 2.50 11.57 11.84 22.40 21.91 (Years) Served Time Average % 0.00% 7.61% 0.00% 0.35% 0.35% 0.00% 0.69% 0.00% 3.11% 2.42% 6.23% 3.46% 0.69% 0.35% 0.69% 9.69% 0.69% 0.35% 8.65% 19.03% 10.03% 12.46% 13.15% OTHER 100.00% 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 9 7 2 1 2 2 1 22 55 29 18 10 36 38 28 25 289 Offenders Number of 5.11 0.00 3.16 4.60 4.38 3.33 3.15 7.95 4.23 7.93 4.61 8.47 3.66 3.95 4.40 5.80 2.43 5.23 3.50 7.55 2.87 11.34 12.98 14.35 (Years) Served Time Average % 0.00% 8.76% 0.18% 0.91% 0.86% 0.54% 1.03% 0.37% 6.17% 3.72% 6.34% 4.73% 0.45% 0.86% 1.28% 1.62% 0.60% 0.23% 1.89% 15.61% 12.05% 17.42% 14.40% 100.00%
EXPIRATION Felony Releases Average Time Served by Release Type: Time Average Release FY Served Releases 2016 2015 - by Felony 0 9 47 44 28 53 19 23 44 66 83 31 12 97 450 802 317 191 326 619 243 895 740 5,139 Offenders Number of 6.20 0.00 6.05 0.50 4.53 5.22 8.94 4.08 5.91 4.45 7.01 4.86 9.45 3.91 5.41 5.76 3.16 6.21 0.00 9.84 2.40 11.01 16.55 21.31 (Years) Served Time Average % 0.00% 6.05% 0.05% 1.15% 1.04% 0.80% 0.35% 0.67% 4.26% 6.08% 9.45% 3.13% 0.46% 0.27% 7.39% 0.00% 5.84% 0.35% 0.05% 2.33% 22.07% 13.66% 14.54% 100.00% PAROLE 0 2 0 2 43 39 30 13 25 17 10 13 87 226 824 510 159 227 353 117 543 276 218 3,734 Offenders Number of
All Other Vehicular Other All Vehicular Homicide/DUI Vehicular Other Drug Offenses Other Drug Cocaine Offenses Cocaine All Other Robbery Aggravated Robbery Othe r Assa ult Aggravated Assault Non-Forcible Forcible Negligent Manslaughter Murder PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP TOTAL Unknown All Other All Esca pe C/S/F Societal/Drugs C/S/F C/S/F Property C/S/F Person Vehicular Drug Offenses Drug Robbery Larceny/Theft Forgery/Fraud Burglary Arson Assa ult Sex Offenses Sex Kidnapping
Homicide
PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL OTHER
time doesAverage served not include tsix modified (6) judgement orders. Total releases 13,993 are
.
32 2016 Statistical Abstract
INMATE ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES
In FY 2016, admissions decreased 762 (5.60%) and releases decreased 784 (5.31%) since last year.
Felony Inmate Admissions by Type: FY 2015-2016
TYPE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE % Parole Violtr. Return 1,567 15.1% 137 6.4% 19 6.0% 1,723 13.4% Probation Violltr Return 2,006 19.3% 404 18.9% 90 28.5% 2,500 19.5% Community Corr. Return 794 7.7% 31 1.4% 35 11.1% 860 6.7% New Commit 5,892 56.8% 1,529 71.5% 163 51.6% 7,584 59.1% Escape Return & Other 120 1.2% 38 1.8% 9 2.8% 167 1.3% TOTAL 10,379 2,139 316 12,834
Felony Inmate Releases by Type: FY 2015-2016
TYPE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE % Parole 2,443 46.2% 956 16.3% 335 11.8% 0 0.0% 3,734 26.7% Probation 602 11.4% 2,265 38.7% 890 31.3% 1 33.3% 3,758 26.9% Community Corrections 32 0.6% 506 8.6% 530 18.6% 2 66.7% 1,068 7.6% Sentence Expiration 2,098 39.7% 2,010 34.3% 1,032 36.3% 0 0.0% 5,142 36.7% Death 89 1.7% 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 95 0.7% Other 27 0.5% 117 2.0% 52 1.8% 0 0.0% 196 1.4% TOTAL 5,291 5,857 2,842 3 13,993
Population, Capacity, & Trends 33
Felony Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2015 – 2016
TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE % 65+ 58 0.6% 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 61 0.5% 60-64 108 1.0% 22 1.0% 2 0.6% 132 1.0% 55-59 265 2.6% 66 3.1% 14 4.4% 345 2.7% 50-54 528 5.1% 129 6.0% 17 5.4% 674 5.3% 45-49 830 8.0% 131 6.1% 27 8.5% 988 7.7%
40-44 1,158 11.2% 181 8.5% 27 8.5% 1,366 10.6% 35-39 1,578 15.2% 252 11.8% 63 19.9% 1,893 14.7% 30-34 2,046 19.7% 326 15.2% 57 18.0% 2,429 18.9% 25-29 2,080 20.0% 457 21.4% 68 21.5% 2,605 20.3% 20-24 1,547 14.9% 503 23.5% 39 12.3% 2,089 16.3% 18-19 170 1.6% 69 3.2% 2 0.6% 241 1.9% <18 11 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 0.1% Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% TOTAL 10,379 2,139 316 12,834
RACE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE % Black 2,992 28.8% 1,644 76.9% 127 40.2% 4,763 37.1% White 7,210 69.5% 448 20.9% 185 58.5% 7,843 61.1% Asian 19 0.2% 4 0.2% 0 0.0% 23 0.2% Hispanic 149 1.4% 43 2.0% 3 0.9% 195 1.5% Native American 9 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 10 0.1% TOTAL 10,379 2,139 316 12,834
Sex TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE % Male 8,545 82.3% 1,888 88.3% 255 80.7% 10,688 83.3% Female 1,834 17.7% 251 11.7% 61 19.3% 2,146 16.7% TOTAL 10,379 2,139 316 12,834 Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
Felony Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2015 – 2016
TDOC % BACKUP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE % 65+ 89 1.7% 19 0.3% 12 0.4% 0 0.0% 120 0.9% 60-64 139 2.6% 47 0.8% 30 1.1% 1 33.3% 217 1.6% 55-59 241 4.6% 152 2.6% 104 3.7% 0 0.0% 497 3.6% 50-54 384 7.3% 298 5.1% 179 6.3% 1 0.3333 862 6.2% 45-49 520 9.8% 444 7.6% 198 7.0% 0 0.0% 1,162 8.3% 40-44 613 11.6% 632 10.8% 269 9.5% 0 0.0% 1,514 10.8% 35-39 882 16.7% 950 16.2% 371 13.1% 0 0.0% 2,203 15.7% 30-34 1,020 19.3% 1246 21.3% 481 16.9% 1 33.3% 2,748 19.6% 25-29 986 18.6% 1248 21.3% 602 21.2% 0 0.0% 2,836 20.3% 20-24 410 7.7% 784 13.4% 553 19.5% 0 0.0% 1,747 12.5% 18-19 7 0.1% 36 0.6% 42 1.5% 0 0.0% 85 0.6% <18 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% TOTAL 5,291 5,857 2,842 3 13,993
RACE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE % Black 1,955 36.9% 1,284 21.9% 1,862 65.5% 1 33.3% 5,102 36.5% White 3,222 60.9% 4,506 76.9% 922 32.4% 2 66.7% 8,652 61.8% Asian 10 0.2% 12 0.2% 8 0.3% 0 0.0% 30 0.2% Hispanic 95 1.8% 53 0.9% 47 1.7% 0 0.0% 195 1.4% Native American 9 0.2% 2 0.0% 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1% Unknown 0 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% TOTAL 5,291 5,857 2,842 3 13,993
Sex TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE % Male 4,676 88.4% 4,568 78.0% 2,444 86.0% 3 100.0% 11,691 83.5% . Female 615 11.6% 1,289 22.0% 398 14.0% 0 0.0% 2,302 16.5% TOTAL 5,291 5,857 2,842 3 13,993 Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
34 2016 Statistical Abstract
6 201
-
5 Y 201 TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE West 1925 1560 3485 Middle 4014 555 4569 East 4440 24 4464
The systemwide totals in the above chart do not include 316 unprocessed judgment orders. Total admissions are 12,834. Region: F
3485 4569 4464 SYSTEMWIDE 24 555 1560 LOCAL 1925 4014 4440 TDOC West Middle East The totals in the above chart do not include 316 systemwide orders. Total are 12,834. unprocessed judgment admissions Inmate Admissions by Geographical
Population, Capacity, & Trends 35
Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction: FY 2015- 2016
TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE COUNTY # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # %
ANDERSON 158 1.5% 1 0.0% 159 1.2% LAUDERDALE 36 0.3% 1 0.0% 37 0.3% BEDFORD 149 1.4% 0 0.0% 149 1.2% LAWRENCE 123 1.2% 2 0.1% 125 1.0% BENTON 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1% LEWIS 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1% BLEDSOE 8 0.1% 0 0.0% 8 0.1% LINCOLN 76 0.7% 0 0.0% 76 0.6% BLOUNT 234 2.3% 2 0.1% 236 1.8% LOUDON 52 0.5% 0 0.0% 52 0.4% BRADLEY 210 2.0% 1 0.0% 211 1.6% McMINN 121 1.2% 0 0.0% 121 0.9% CAMPBELL 79 0.8% 1 0.0% 80 0.6% McNAIRY 14 0.1% 1 0.0% 15 0.1% CANNON 31 0.3% 0 0.0% 31 0.2% MACON 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% CARROLL 37 0.4% 0 0.0% 37 0.3% MADISON 297 2.9% 2 0.1% 299 2.3% CARTER 120 1.2% 1 0.0% 121 0.9% MARION 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% CHEATHAM 65 0.6% 0 0.0% 65 0.5% MARSHALL 65 0.6% 0 0.0% 65 0.5% CHESTER 20 0.2% 0 0.0% 20 0.2% MAURY 158 1.5% 0 0.0% 158 1.2% CLAIBORNE 91 0.9% 2 0.1% 93 0.7% MEIGS 11 0.1% 0 0.0% 11 0.1% CLAY 21 0.2% 0 0.0% 21 0.2% MONROE 106 1.0% 1 0.0% 107 0.8% COCKE 73 0.7% 1 0.0% 74 0.6% MONTGOMERY 119 1.1% 1 0.0% 120 0.9% COFFEE 124 1.2% 9 0.4% 133 1.0% MOORE 22 0.2% 0 0.0% 22 0.2% CROCKETT 22 0.2% 0 0.0% 22 0.2% MORGAN 25 0.2% 1 0.0% 26 0.2%
CUMBERLAND 210 2.0% 0 0.0% 210 1.6% OBION 37 0.4% 0 0.0% 37 0.3% DAVIDSON 700 6.7% 526 24.6% 1226 9.6% OVERTON 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3% DECATUR 15 0.1% 1 0.0% 16 0.1% PERRY 13 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1% DEKALB 55 0.5% 0 0.0% 55 0.4% PICKETT 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 0.0% DICKSON 96 0.9% 1 0.0% 97 0.8% POLK 46 0.4% 0 0.0% 46 0.4% DYER 136 1.3% 1 0.0% 137 1.1% PUTNAM 195 1.9% 0 0.0% 195 1.5% FAYETTE 35 0.3% 0 0.0% 35 0.3% RHEA 28 0.3% 0 0.0% 28 0.2% FENTRESS 65 0.6% 0 0.0% 65 0.5% ROANE 55 0.5% 1 0.0% 56 0.4% FRANKLIN 61 0.6% 0 0.0% 61 0.5% ROBERTSON 120 1.2% 0 0.0% 120 0.9% GIBSON 116 1.1% 1 0.0% 117 0.9% RUTHERFORD 409 3.9% 7 0.3% 416 3.2% GILES 57 0.5% 1 0.0% 58 0.5% SCOTT 56 0.5% 0 0.0% 56 0.4% GRAINGER 60 0.6% 1 0.0% 61 0.5% SEQUATCHIE 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% GREENE 115 1.1% 4 0.2% 119 0.9% SEVIER 137 1.3% 0 0.0% 137 1.1% GRUNDY 40 0.4% 0 0.0% 40 0.3% SHELBY 769 7.4% 1,550 72.5% 2319 18.1% HAMBLEN 247 2.4% 2 0.1% 249 1.9% SMITH 50 0.5% 0 0.0% 50 0.4% HAMILTON 366 3.5% 0 0.0% 366 2.9% STEWART 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1% HANCOCK 51 0.5% 0 0.0% 51 0.4% SULLIVAN 369 3.6% 0 0.0% 369 2.9% HARDEMAN 57 0.5% 0 0.0% 57 0.4% SUMNER 267 2.6% 2 0.1% 269 2.1% HARDIN 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% TIPTON 82 0.8% 0 0.0% 82 0.6% HAWKINS 108 1.0% 0 0.0% 108 0.8% TROUSDALE 38 0.4% 0 0.0% 38 0.3% HAYWOOD 27 0.3% 0 0.0% 27 0.2% UNICOI 39 0.4% 0 0.0% 39 0.3% HENDERSON 87 0.8% 0 0.0% 87 0.7% UNION 54 0.5% 0 0.0% 54 0.4% HENRY 31 0.3% 1 0.0% 32 0.2% VAN BUREN 7 0.1% 0 0.0% 7 0.1% HICKMAN 41 0.4% 1 0.0% 42 0.3% WARREN 85 0.8% 0 0.0% 85 0.7% HOUSTON 10 0.1% 0 0.0% 10 0.1% WASHINGTON 204 2.0% 2 0.1% 206 1.6% HUMPHREYS 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3% WAYNE 45 0.4% 1 0.0% 46 0.4% JACKSON 9 0.1% 0 0.0% 9 0.1% WEAKLEY 33 0.3% 2 0.1% 35 0.3% JEFFERSON 115 1.1% 3 0.1% 118 0.9% WHITE 78 0.8% 2 0.1% 80 0.6% JOHNSON 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% WILLIAMSON 140 1.3% 0 0.0% 140 1.1% KNOX 939 9.0% 0 0.0% 939 7.3% WILSON 160 1.5% 2 0.1% 162 1.3% LAKE 14 0.1% 0 0.0% 14 0.1% Unknown 316 2% TOTAL 10,379 100% 2,139 100% 12,834 100%
.
36 2016 Statistical Abstract
Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction: FY 2015 – 2016
TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE COUNTY # % # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # % # %
ANDERSON 163 0.8% 113 1.8% 4 0.1% 280 0.9% LAUDERDALE 102 0.5% 33 0.5% 14 0.5% 149 0.5% BEDFORD 326 1.6% 50 0.8% 1 0.0% 377 1.3% LAWRENCE 159 0.8% 114 1.8% 3 0.1% 276 0.9% BENTON 37 0.2% 16 0.3% 1 0.0% 54 0.2% LEWIS 33 0.2% 14 0.2% 2 0.1% 49 0.2% BLEDSOE 20 0.1% 13 0.2% 0 0.0% 33 0.1% LINCOLN 125 0.6% 52 0.8% 3 0.1% 180 0.6% BLOUNT 287 1.4% 125 2.0% 6 0.2% 418 1.4% LOUDON 62 0.3% 44 0.7% 11 0.4% 117 0.4% BRADLEY 340 1.6% 114 1.8% 5 0.2% 459 1.5% McMINN 128 0.6% 143 2.3% 2 0.1% 273 0.9% CAMPBELL 118 0.6% 98 1.6% 1 0.0% 217 0.7% McNAIRY 36 0.2% 17 0.3% 6 0.2% 59 0.2% CANNON 61 0.3% 8 0.1% 2 0.1% 71 0.2% MACON 45 0.2% 44 0.7% 1 0.0% 90 0.3% CARROLL 64 0.3% 33 0.5% 1 0.0% 98 0.3% MADISON 794 3.8% 54 0.9% 4 0.1% 852 2.8% CARTER 112 0.5% 64 1.0% 26 0.9% 202 0.7% MARION 76 0.4% 45 0.7% 2 0.1% 123 0.4% CHEATHAM 86 0.4% 47 0.8% 3 0.1% 136 0.5% MARSHALL 168 0.8% 47 0.8% 1 0.0% 216 0.7% CHESTER 44 0.2% 24 0.4% 0 0.0% 68 0.2% MAURY 275 1.3% 141 2.3% 3 0.1% 419 1.4% CLAIBORNE 83 0.4% 99 1.6% 2 0.1% 184 0.6% MEIGS 13 0.1% 18 0.3% 0 0.0% 31 0.1% CLAY 12 0.1% 24 0.4% 1 0.0% 37 0.1% MONROE 123 0.6% 65 1.0% 0 0.0% 188 0.6% COCKE 153 0.7% 40 0.6% 1 0.0% 194 0.6% MONTGOMERY 347 1.7% 121 1.9% 10 0.3% 478 1.6% COFFEE 255 1.2% 59 1.0% 7 0.2% 321 1.1% MOORE 26 0.1% 15 0.2% 1 0.0% 42 0.1% CROCKETT 43 0.2% 20 0.3% 0 0.0% 63 0.2% MORGAN 33 0.2% 11 0.2% 1 0.0% 45 0.2% CUMBERLAND 246 1.2% 67 1.1% 1 0.0% 314 1.0% OBION 66 0.3% 46 0.7% 3 0.1% 115 0.4% DAVIDSON 3,192 15.4% 241 3.9% 633 21.1% 4066 13.6% OVERTON 48 0.2% 28 0.5% 4 0.1% 80 0.3% DECATUR 23 0.1% 6 0.1% 2 0.1% 31 0.1% PERRY 25 0.1% 10 0.2% 1 0.0% 36 0.1% DEKALB 59 0.3% 47 0.8% 4 0.1% 110 0.4% PICKETT 8 0.0% 6 0.1% 1 0.0% 15 0.1% DICKSON 102 0.5% 68 1.1% 6 0.2% 176 0.6% POLK 31 0.1% 42 0.7% 1 0.0% 74 0.2% DYER 175 0.8% 102 1.6% 1 0.0% 278 0.9% PUTNAM 173 0.8% 160 2.6% 3 0.1% 336 1.1% FAYETTE 40 0.2% 43 0.7% 8 0.3% 91 0.3% RHEA 67 0.3% 23 0.4% 2 0.1% 92 0.3% FENTRESS 67 0.3% 53 0.9% 1 0.0% 121 0.4% ROANE 65 0.3% 32 0.5% 7 0.2% 104 0.3% FRANKLIN 126 0.6% 35 0.6% 9 0.3% 170 0.6% ROBERTSON 84 0.4% 92 1.5% 12 0.4% 188 0.6% GIBSON 117 0.6% 93 1.5% 2 0.1% 212 0.7% RUTHERFORD 698 3.4% 135 2.2% 14 0.5% 847 2.8% GILES 111 0.5% 24 0.4% 3 0.1% 138 0.5% SCOTT 71 0.3% 59 1.0% 2 0.1% 132 0.4% GRAINGER 87 0.4% 56 0.9% 3 0.1% 146 0.5% SEQUATCHIE 50 0.2% 41 0.7% 0 0.0% 91 0.3% GREENE 120 0.6% 78 1.3% 4 0.1% 202 0.7% SEVIER 287 1.4% 150 2.4% 13 0.4% 450 1.5% GRUNDY 79 0.4% 35 0.6% 4 0.1% 118 0.4% SHELBY 3409 16.4% 321 5.2% 1,467 48.8% 5197 17.3% HAMBLEN 207 1.0% 113 1.8% 20 0.7% 340 1.1% SMITH 51 0.2% 44 0.7% 0 0.0% 95 0.3% HAMILTON 744 3.6% 87 1.4% 18 0.6% 849 2.8% STEWART 10 0.0% 21 0.3% 0 0.0% 31 0.1% HANCOCK 29 0.1% 30 0.5% 1 0.0% 60 0.2% SULLIVAN 718 3.5% 237 3.8% 21 0.7% 976 3.3% HARDEMAN 66 0.3% 53 0.9% 12 0.4% 131 0.4% SUMNER 398 1.9% 236 3.8% 29 1.0% 663 2.2% HARDIN 61 0.3% 42 0.7% 1 0.0% 104 0.3% TIPTON 189 0.9% 32 0.5% 10 0.3% 231 0.8% HAWKINS 101 0.5% 101 1.6% 4 0.1% 206 0.7% TROUSDALE 29 0.1% 30 0.5% 0 0.0% 59 0.2% HAYWOOD 35 0.2% 43 0.7% 1 0.0% 79 0.3% UNICOI 33 0.2% 16 0.3% 7 0.2% 56 0.2% HENDERSON 75 0.4% 90 1.5% 2 0.1% 167 0.6% UNION 78 0.4% 17 0.3% 1 0.0% 96 0.3% HENRY 57 0.3% 34 0.5% 1 0.0% 92 0.3% VAN BUREN 12 0.1% 6 0.1% 0 0.0% 18 0.1% HICKMAN 55 0.3% 38 0.6% 0 0.0% 93 0.3% WARREN 162 0.8% 59 1.0% 6 0.2% 227 0.8% HOUSTON 23 0.1% 10 0.2% 2 0.1% 35 0.1% WASHINGTON 193 0.9% 144 2.3% 37 1.2% 374 1.2% HUMPHREYS 35 0.2% 19 0.0% 1 0.0% 55 0.2% WAYNE 56 0.3% 41 0.7% 0 0.0% 97 0.3% JACKSON 23 0.1% 7 0.1% 0 0.0% 30 0.1% WEAKLEY 36 0.2% 30 0.5% 0 0.0% 66 0.2% JEFFERSON 201 1.0% 119 1.9% 4 0.1% 324 1.1% WHITE 66 0.3% 53 0.9% 5 0.2% 124 0.4% JOHNSON 51 0.2% 19 0.3% 18 0.6% 88 0.3% WILLIAMSON 233 1.1% 88 1.4% 0 0.0% 321 1.1% KNOX 2074 10.0% 170 2.7% 14 0.5% 2258 7.5% WILSON 226 1.1% 139 2.2% 2 0.1% 367 1.2% LAKE 34 0.2% 20 0.3% 0 0.0% 54 0.2% PENDING 8 0% 0 0% 452 15% 460 1.5% TOTAL 20,744 100% 6,206 100% 3005 100% 29,955 100%
Population, Capacity, & Trends 37
Total Community Supervision Felon Population: June 30, 2016
Probation 58,256
Parole 12,678
Community Corrections 7,891 Total 78,825
Total Community Supervision Population
Source: Tennessee Felon Population Updates
Parole & Probation Population by District – June 30, 2016 District Parole Probation Total 10 815 4,624 5,439 20 1,202 5,553 6,755 21 470 2,922 3,392 30 1,033 6,454 7,487 31 503 2,254 2,757 40 103 3,085 3,188 41 507 1,935 2,442 42 1,842 1,815 3,657 50 824 3,556 4,380 51 529 2,639 3,168 60 629 2,168 2,797 61 805 2,386 3,191 70 298 185 483 71 745 3,141 3,886 72 1,139 4,298 5,437 80 398 2,402 2,800 81 570 2,431 3,001 OIC 266 6,407 6,673 Unassigned 0 1 1 . TOTAL 12,678 58,256 70,934
38 2016 Statistical Abstract
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, RACE
Community Supervision Population by Age (Systemwide) June 30, 2016
Community Probation % Parole % % SYSTEMWIDE % Corrections 65+ 1,059 1.8% 549 4.3% 78 1.0% 1,686 2.1% 60-64 1,415 2.4% 551 4.3% 139 1.8% 2,105 2.7% 55-59 2,822 4.8% 963 7.6% 349 4.4% 4,134 5.2% 50-54 4,349 7.5% 1,348 10.6% 508 6.4% 6,205 7.9% 45-49 5,392 9.3% 1,508 11.9% 728 9.2% 7,628 9.7% 40-44 6,647 11.4% 1,689 13.3% 996 12.6% 9,332 11.8% 35-39 8,782 15.1% 2,214 17.5% 1,402 17.8% 12,398 15.7% 30-34 9,840 16.9% 2,066 16.3% 1,562 19.8% 13,468 17.1% 25-29 10,178 17.5% 1,420 11.2% 1,374 17.4% 12,972 16.5% 20-24 7,249 12.4% 364 2.9% 727 9.2% 8,340 10.6% 18-19 517 0.9% 5 0.0% 28 0.4% 550 0.7% <18 6 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% TOTAL 58,256 100% 12,678 100% 7,891 100% 78,825 100% Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
Population, Capacity, & Trends 39
Community Supervision Population by Sex and Race (Systemwide) June 30, 2016
Female White 24% 63% Male Black 76% 34%
Other 3%
Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type of Supervision
Community Probation % Parole % % Systemwide Corrections Male Black 15,488 36.1% 4,939 44.6% 1,835 32.1% 22,262 White 25,708 60.0% 5,698 51.4% 3,736 65.4% 35,142 Asian 236 0.6% 47 0.4% 12 0.2% 295 Hispanic 1,380 3.2% 388 3.5% 124 2.2% 1,892 Native American 53 0.1% 9 0.1% 3 0.1% 65 Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1
Total Male 42,865 100.0% 11,081 100.0% 5,711 100.0% 59,657
Female Black 3,880 25.2% 393 24.6% 348 16.0% 4,621 White 11,249 73.1% 1,172 73.4% 1,814 83.2% 14,235 Asian 46 0.3% 4 0.3% 2 0.1% 52 Hispanic 195 1.3% 19 1.2% 13 0.6% 227 Native American 21 0.1% 9 0.6% 3 0.1% 33 Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 Total Female 15,391 100.0% 1,597 100.0% 2,180 100.0% 19,168
TOTAL 58,256 73.9% 12,678 16.1% 7,891 10.0% 78,825 Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
.
40 2016 Statistical Abstract
Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race and Sex: FY 2015-2016
Community Probation % Parole % SYSTEMWIDE % Corrections % 65+ 199 1.1% 57 1.4% 18 0.6% 274 1.1% 60-64 271 1.5% 91 2.2% 31 1.1% 393 1.6% 55-59 620 3.4% 185 4.5% 77 2.7% 882 3.5% 50-54 981 5.3% 309 7.6% 137 4.9% 1,427 5.7% 45-49 1,326 7.2% 426 10.4% 205 7.3% 1,957 7.8% 40-44 1,727 9.4% 496 12.1% 302 10.8% 2,525 10.0% 35-39 2,376 12.9% 733 17.9% 438 15.6% 3,547 14.1% 30-34 3,007 16.4% 769 18.8% 593 21.1% 4,369 17.3% 25-29 3,510 19.1% 695 17.0% 549 19.6% 4,754 18.8% 20-24 3,552 19.4% 316 7.7% 407 14.5% 4,275 16.9% 18-19 768 4.2% 9 0.2% 45 1.6% 822 3.3% <18 13 0.1% 0 0.0% 2 0.1% 15 0.1% TOTAL 18,350 4,086 2,804 25,240 Community RACE Probation % Parole % % SYSTEMWIDE % Corrections Black 6,363 34.7% 1,540 37.7% 680 24.3% 8,583 34.0% White 11,551 62.9% 2,472 60.5% 2,089 74.5% 16,112 63.8% Asian 83 0.5% 11 0.3% 3 0.1% 97 0.4% Hispanic 337 1.8% 56 1.4% 30 1.1% 423 1.7% Native American 16 0.1% 7 0.2% 2 0.1% 25 0.1% TOTAL 18,350 4,086 2,804 25,240 Community Sex Probation % Parole % % SYSTEMWIDE % Corrections Male 13,444 73.3% 3,493 85.5% 2033 72.5% 18,970 75.2% Female 4,906 26.7% 593 14.5% 771 27.5% 6,270 24.8% TOTAL 18,350 4,086 2,804 25,240 Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2015-2016
Community Probation % Parole % % SYSTEMWIDE % Corrections 65+ 289 1.7% 100 2.2% 14 0.6% 403 1.7% 60-64 403 2.3% 121 2.7% 35 1.6% 559 2.3% 55-59 780 4.5% 202 4.4% 74 3.4% 1,056 4.4% 50-54 1,144 6.7% 384 8.4% 116 5.3% 1,644 6.9% 45-49 1,424 8.3% 468 10.3% 186 8.4% 2,078 8.7% 40-44 1,821 10.6% 643 14.1% 246 11.2% 2,710 11.3% 35-39 2,362 13.7% 830 18.2% 330 15.0% 3,522 14.7% 30-34 2,962 17.2% 845 18.5% 455 20.6% 4,262 17.8% 25-29 3,292 19.2% 720 15.8% 471 21.4% 4,483 18.7% 20-24 2,585 15.0% 246 5.4% 276 12.5% 3,107 13.0% 18-19 116 0.7% 2 0.0% 3 0.1% 121 0.5% <18 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% TOTAL 17,179 4,561 2,206 23,946 Community RACE Probation % Parole % % SYSTEMWIDE % Corrections Black 5,784 33.7% 1,807 39.6% 536 262.2% 8,127 33.9% White 10,993 64.0% 2,677 58.7% 1,654 498.3% 15,324 64.0% Asian 79 0.5% 9 0.2% 1 0.0% 89 0.4% Hispanic 302 1.8% 65 1.4% 12 13.7% 379 1.6% Native American 21 0.1% 3 0.1% 3 1.0% 27 0.1% TOTAL 17,179 4,561 2,206 23,946
Community Sex Probation % Parole % % SYSTEMWIDE % Corrections Male 12,515 72.9% 3,834 84.1% 1,598 72.4% 17,947 74.9% Female 4,664 27.1% 727 15.9% 608 27.6% 5,999 25.1%
TOTAL 17,179 4,561 2,206 23,946 Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
Population, Capacity, & Trends 41
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES FY 2015 – 2016
Community Supervision Releases by Type: FY 2015-2016
Community TYPE Probation % Parole % % SYSTEMWIDE % Corrections Death 437 2.5% 146 3.2% 50 2.3% 633 2.6% Discharges & Expirations 11,281 65.7% 2,662 58.4% 604 27.4% 14,547 60.7% Revocation, Positive Drug Test 315 1.8% 18 0.4% 213 9.7% 546 2.3% Revocation, New Charge 2,561 14.9% 991 21.7% 407 18.4% 3,959 16.5% Revocation, New Charge Pending 547 3.2% 402 8.8% 68 3.1% 1,017 4.2% Revocation, Technical 2,038 11.9% 342 7.5% 864 39.2% 3,244 13.5% TOTAL 17,179 4,561 2,206 23,946
.
Population, Capacity, & Trends 43
Offender Accountability,
Programs & Services
.
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 45
Total Hours and Estimated Value of Inmate Community Service Work FY 2015 - 2016
1st. 2nd 3rd 4th. FACILITY Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL BCCX 4,921 5,588 4,988 8,001 23,498 HCCF MCCX 20,732 16,564 16,798 17,250 71,344 MLCC 4,780 4,436 4,697 4,687 18,600 NECX 33,413 32,706 33,916 33,056 133,091
NW CX 2,435 2,783 4,620 6,690 16,528 RMSI 26,727 31,383 25,504 36,672 120,286 SPND SCCF 1,726 1,765 1,953 1,408 6,852 TPFW 0 TTCC TCIX 59,144 58,887 55,996 56,670 230,697 W TSP 15,057 13,870 15,434 162 44,523 WCFA SYSTEM 168,935 167,982 163,906 164,596 665,419 TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $4,824,288 Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.
Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work by Community Supervision FY 2015 - 2016
1st. 2nd 3rd 4th. DISTRICT
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL District 10 5,725 5,129 4,397 2,506 17,756 District 20 2,111 2,110 2,161 2,701 9,083 District 21 1,769 1,294 915 1,220 5,197 District 30 200 237 414 837 1,688 District 31 373 608 517 588 2,086 District 40, 41, 42 2,779 2,257 1,926 2,988 9,948 District 50 1,843 1,130 2,317 1,204 6,494 District 51 1,542 1,592 1,972 1,674 6,780 District 60 2,001 2,835 2,642 2,614 10,092 District 61 860 917 628 321 2,725 District 70, 71, 72 3,969 3,382 4,169 3,617 15,135 District 80 927 340 1,064 264 2,595 District 81 260 259 254 994 1,766 SYSTEM 24,356 22,088 23,374 21,526 91,344 TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $662,245 Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.
.
46 2016 Statistical Abstract
INMATE PROGRAM ASSIGNMENTS
INMATE ASSIGMENTS
June 30, 2016 Percentage
of Assignment Inmates Population Academic Education 1,838 8.86% Vocational Programs 1,382 6.66%
Support 5,498 26.50% Program Services 1,113 5.37% Recycling 99 0.48%
TRICOR 948 4.57%
Work Lines 229 1.10% Other Agencies 84 0.40% Community Service 416 2.01%
Work Release 34 0.16% Cognitive Behavioral Programming 1,708 8.23% Behavioral Programming 1,114 5.37% Mental Health Programs 447 2.15% Tech. Violators Diversion Program 40 0.19% Release Center 29 0.14%
Boot Camp/SAIU 39 0.19%
Other 719 3.47% Total Assigned 15,737 75.86% Unassignable Status* 2,164 10.43%
Job Waiting List 2,843 13.71%
TOTAL INMATES 20,744 100.00% % of Eligible Inmates Assigned 89.6% *Inmates who can not be assigned due to their status, which may include those
in segregation or initial classification, etc.
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 47
DRUG SCREENS: FY 2015 – 2016
Random drug screens are conducted monthly on 2.5% of the inmate population. These screens are necessary to identify the use of substances frequently used in prison. Substance abuse program participants are given an initial urine screen at the beginning of the program and are subject to facility random and reasonable suspicion testing throughout the program. All positive screens are confirmed through additional testing, and graduated sanctions are used for any positive drug screen.
Inmate Drug Screens
FY 2016 FY 2015 FY 2014 SA Program Number # % % % Quarter Average FY Tested Positive/ Positive/ Positive Positive 2016 1st 878 45 5.13% 3.01% 2.45% 2nd 757 48 6.34% 5.08% 1.94% 3rd 943 69 7.32% 4.74% 3.28% 7.09%
4th 610 64 10.49% 5.86% 3.89%
Yearly 3188 226 7.09% 4.86% 2.99%
Although the number of drug screenings administered increased from 2,780 in FY 2015 to 3,188 in FY 2016 (15%), the percentage of positive drug screens only increased slightly more than 2%.
.
48 2016 Statistical Abstract
INMATE EDUCATION: FY 2015 – 2016
EDUCATIONAL ENROLLMENT: FY 2015-2016
ABE/HiSET SEGREGATED VOCATIONAL Closed Circuit VOLUNTEER INSTITUTION Full-Time Part-Time TV LITERACY COLLEGE Full-time Part-Time TOTAL BCCX 673 0 0 98 6 752 0 1529 DSNF 38 0 0 0 1 36 0 75 HCCF 2168 0 0 0 1 645 0 2814 MCCX 1062 0 0 61 28 598 0 1749 MLCC 77 0 0 0 2 199 0 278 NECX 769 0 0 0 3 1275 0 2047 NWCX 1016 0 0 0 27 1067 0 2110 RMSI 125 0 0 45 21 174 0 365 SCCF 716 0 0 0 13 382 0 1111 TCIX 381 0 0 0 138 195 0 714 TPFW 370 0 0 18 90 192 0 670 TTCC 197 0 0 0 0 13 0 210 WCFA 979 0 0 0 2 539 0 1520 WTSP 474 0 0 169 13 555 0 1211 YEARLY 9,045 0 0 391 345 6,622 0 16,403 TOTALS
TEST RESULTS 2015 - 2016 HiSET COMPLETIONS VOCATIONAL INSTITUTION NUMBER NUMBER PERCENTAGE NUMBER
TESTED PASSED PASSED COMPLETIONS
87 50 57% 294 BCCX 2 1 50% 42 DSNF HCCF 59 45 76% 317 MCCX 102 54 53% 270 MLCC 50 14 28% 95 NECX 116 53 46% 401 NWCX 137 75 55% 326 RMSI 37 20 54% 117 SCCF 95 41 43% 216 TCIX 60 35 58% 116 TPFW 35 23 66% 93 TTCC 18 16 89% 0 WCFA 34 24 71% 139 WTSP 81 48 59% 185
YEARLY 913 499 55% 2611 TOTALS
High School Equivalency & Vocational Certificates: FY 2007-2016 FY 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 GED / HiSET 685 786 737 710 700 640 618 460* 290* 499 Vocational 1,365 1,342 1,468 1,585 2,282 3,676 3,672 2,927 2,938 2,611 *G.E.D. HiSET *Due to the transition from GED to HiSET, there were fewer exams administered in the last of FY14 & first of FY15.
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 49
REHABILITATIVE SERVICES DIVISION
Office of Clinical Services The Office of Clinical Services operates under the leadership of the Assistant Commissioner of Rehabilitative Services. The Office of Clinical Services supports the mission of the TDOC by providing quality healthcare in the most efficient, cost effective, and ethical manner possible to its more than 20,000 inmates, while protecting the public health interest of the citizens of Tennessee. Upon intake into our prison system, all offenders receive extensive medical, mental health, dental and substance use screening and testing to identify their health status and treatment needs. Each of the Department’s facilities provides an on-site health clinic that offers a full range of healthcare services (e.g., daily sick call visits, chronic disease clinics, dental care, case management pharmacy, utilization management, inpatient services, out-patient services, infirmary services, tele-health, tele-psychiatry suicide crisis intervention, and emergency care).
Health Services Health Services strives for the provision of essential medical and dental care and the elimination of costly expenditures attributed to unnecessary procedures through extensive inpatient utilization management efforts, statewide nursing skill assessment, and development and clinical case management. The goal of utilization management is to encourage the highest quality, in the most appropriate setting, from the most appropriate provider. Through the utilization management program the Department seeks to avoid overuse of medical services by making clinical decisions based on available evidence based guidelines.
The Nursing Skills Development Program ensures that all TDOC nurses are both competent and up to date in their ability to utilize each facility’s infirmary to its full potential, thus decreasing the number of inmates needing costly emergency room treatment and hospitalization for minor and chronic conditions. This also allows for shorter inpatient days when hospitalization is medically indicated and a quicker return to the inmate’s assigned facility, due to follow up care being performed on site (i.e. completion of IV antibiotics and limited chemotherapeutic agents). Additionally, Control measures have been established to track hospital admissions and transfers to the emergency room. One of the newer programs implemented was On-site Chemotherapy Infusion Program (OChIP). This program further reduces the number of days a patient would have to remain in the hospital for their treatment. New innovations to reduce inpatient stays include the implementation of the Regional Infirmary system. This program has facilitated placing sub-acutely ill patients at regional sites, thereby reducing overall hospital stays. Finally, the endoscopy program utilizes onsite services to avoid costly hospital admissions.
.
50 2016 Statistical Abstract
Hospital admissions initially decreased in FY 2013. Admissions have remained fairly constant averaging approximately 735 admissions per year over the past four fiscal year periods (see Figure 1). Telehealth has increased approximately 428% from 2013 to present (see Figure 2).
Figure 1 Figure 2
Tennessee Department of Correction Collaborates with Tennessee Department of Health In October 2015, the TB Elimination Program, HIV/STD & Viral Hepatitis Program, Information Technology Services Division and Laboratory Services of Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) collaborated with the Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC) to screen and test all new male and female inmates for TB infection, HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia. Results: Following pilot testing at both facilities, from December 2015 through May 2016 a total of 16,166 tests for five diseases were obtained. The aggregate test positivity rates were: TB infection – 5.0%; HIV infection – 0.8%; syphilis – 1.0%; gonorrhea – 2.2%; and chlamydia – 0.2%; positivity rates differed by gender. The combined IGRA indeterminate test rate was <0.2%. Conclusion: Integrated prison intake screening for five diseases of public health importance has been successfully implemented in Tennessee. PCSI provides opportunities for disease surveillance, diagnosis, treatment and prevention.
Behavioral Health Services Behavioral Health Services sets policy standards for the delivery of mental health, substance use, and sex offender treatment services, and evaluates the care provided throughout the TDOC system. The goals are to (1) reduce the debilitating effects of serious mental illness and maximize each inmate’s ability to participate in programs while maintaining a safe prison environment for inmates and staff, and (2) help prepare inmates with mental illness, substance use, and/or sex offender treatment needs to successfully transition from incarceration back to the community. Behavioral Health Services collaborates with mental health and substance use treatment vendors to provide specialty services (e.g., psychology, psychiatry, and substance use treatment). A continuum of services is provided including psychological assessment, case management, medication management, crisis intervention, individual/group therapy, substance use treatment services, and sex offender treatment.
• Standardized the curriculum for Centers of Excellence Level III and Level IV Supportive Living Units (SLU) at Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, DeBerry Special Needs Facility, Morgan County Correctional Complex, Northwest Correctional Complex; South Central Correctional Facility, Tennessee Prison for Women, and West Tennessee State Prison, to comprehensively address offenders’ mental health and criminogenic needs. • Expanded the use of telehealth for the delivery of psychiatric services. • Maintained the percentage of inmates on polypharmacy (four or more psychotropic medications) to less than 4.0%. • Implemented a Behavioral Health Model to integrate mental health and substance use treatment services at all facilities. • Expanded services to inmates on restrictive housing at TPFW, BCCX, and NECX.
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 51
• Expanded substance use treatment services to provide programming and a Licensed Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselor at every facility. These increased services will enable the Department to provide services to approximately 1,868 inmates on a yearly basis, serving 9.3% of Tennessee’s incarcerated population. Increased collaboration between the Case Managers, Correctional Counselors, and Forensic Social Workers to ensure inmates with severe mental illness and/or substance use issues receive appropriate mental health care upon reentry back to the community. • In collaboration with our mental health vendor, maintained a web-based reentry portal to identify community resources such as housing, transportation, medical care, etc., that are available throughout the state to assist offenders in overcoming barriers that commonly pose a challenge to successful transition back to the community.
Behavioral Health Services has continued to utilize standardized protocols and guidelines for community transition of inmates with mental illness. The focus is treatment team effectiveness, case management, and transition/reentry of offenders with special mental health needs. Behavioral Health Services supports the use of behavioral and cognitive- behavioral interventions as an alternative to the exclusive reliance on psychotropic medication in addressing offenders’ mental health issues.
The number of offenders with mental health needs continues to pose a challenge to TDOC. At fiscal year-end 2016, there were approximately 5,743 offenders who receive treatment for a diagnosed mental disorder. This number includes those in Levels of Care II, III, & IV; however, it excludes those offenders who are participating in treatment for a substance use disorder.
General Discussion Approximately 20% of the offender population is receiving psychotropic medication for a mental illness. Inmates are assessed for their level of mental health functioning in accordance with a Levels of Care (LOC) system. The increase in the number of offenders receiving mental health treatment this fiscal year is 3%. The rate of growth is lower than the previous two years (29% and 8% respectively). Mental health treatment resources available through the continued implementation of the behavioral health contract reflect a more accurate assessment of the true mental health needs of the offender population. .
Office of Quality Assurance and Improvement The Office of Quality Assurance and Improvement (QAI) was established to ensure resources, including education, and treatment and programming, are delivered to offenders according to validated risk and needs assessment tools or clinical need in order to support successful reentry into the community. QAI managers audit programming in the institutions (e.g.,
52 2016 Statistical Abstract academic/vocational, jobs, religious/social services) and community supervision offices (Thinking for a Change, Victims Impact and Stopping Abuse for Everyone- S.A.F.E.) to ensure compliance with TDOC policy and ACA standards. In addition, the office is responsible for Rehabilitative Services’ Ombudsman duties which include the investigation and resolution of offender inquiries about all rehabilitative services concerns (e.g., clinical, educational, jobs, religious/social services) while incarcerated in TDOC institutions.
QAI is also the repository for the collection, analysis, and reporting of data for Customer Focused Government (CFG), Governor Haslam’s initiative in which Tennessee state government agencies focus on offering the best service at the lowest possible cost. Data submitted from each facility is reviewed at weekly and monthly intervals to ensure offenders are receiving the most efficient and effective programs and services, and that those programs and services prepare offenders for a successful transition back to the community.
The QAI office also reinforces a corrective action process in which facilities that report below average results for any CFG measure are required to develop a plan of action with the objective of identifying most effective actions to correct error causes, improving processes so outcomes are more effective and efficient, achieving measurable improvement, and eliminating repeated deficient practices.
On the whole, the Office of Quality Assurance and Improvement incorporates a collaborative, evidence-based approach to measuring correctional intervention effectiveness through a continuous assessment process. This approach focuses on ongoing improvements from established benchmarks and measures, while ensuring programs are producing meaningful outcomes, such as customer service and preparing inmates for reentry, with the goal of reducing recidivism.
Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation The Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation is a unit within Rehabilitative Services that is tasked with reducing recidivism through the following evidence-based programs and services:
• Risk/Needs Assessment • Inmate Jobs • Reentry Services • Volunteer and Social Services • Education • Cognitive-Behavioral Programming • Offender Workforce Development • Housing • Counseling Services • Victim Services
The Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation is continuously striving to develop best practices for the offender assessment, classification, case management and reentry services that are necessary to ensure offender reentry plans and program case plans are developed for each offender. The reentry plans and program case plans are specific to each offender and will be used throughout their incarceration to ensure that all their recommended program, education, and reentry needs are met. The Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation has expanded its cognitive behavioral programming and reentry services to include offenders assigned to community supervision in order to ensure continuity in the delivery of the offender’s programmatic needs. The Office of Offender Development is responsible for ensuring all offenders have access to educational, vocational and post-secondary educational opportunities, and for issuance of state identification, housing assistance, and employment assistance for offenders. The Office of Offender Development is also responsible for recruitment of volunteers and for oversight of community partnerships such as the “Take One” program. Take One is a program designed to provide mentorship and positive role models to offenders and their families in adjusting to society during the first year of release.
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 53
Demographics
54 2016 Statistical Abstract
Demographics 55
56 2016 Statistical Abstract
Prison Security Designations: June 30, 2016 County Facility Security Designation
Johnson Northeast Correctional Complex Minimum - Maximum
Morgan Morgan County Correctional Complex Minimum - Maximum
Bledsoe Bledsoe County Correctional Complex Minimum - Close
Trousdale Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex Minimum - Medium
Davidson DeBerry Special Needs Facility Minimum - Maximum
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Minimum - Maximum
Tennessee Prison for Women Minimum - Maximum
Hickman Turney Center Industrial Complex Minimum - Close
Wayne South Central Correctional Facility Minimum - Close
Hardeman Hardeman County Correctional Facility Minimum - Medium
Whiteville Correctional Facility Minimum - Medium
Shelby Mark Luttrell Correctional Center Minimum - Medium
Lauderdale West Tennessee State Penitentiary Minimum - Maximum
Lake Northwest Correctional Complex Minimum - Close
Inmate Population Custody Levels: June 30, 2016 Prison Percent Custody Number of Level Inmates of Total Maximum 508 2.4% Close 781 3.8% Medium 16,157 77.9% Minimum 3,006 14.5% Unclassified 292 1.4% TOTAL 20,744 100.0%
Average Daily Population: FY 2015 - 2016 Average Daily Institution Population Bledsoe County Correctional Complex 2,434 DeBerry Special Needs Facility 656 Hardeman County Correctional Facility 1,998 Mark Luttrell Correctional Center 426
Morgan County Correctional Complex 2,125
Northeast Correctional Complex 1,801
Northwest Correctional Complex 2,353
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 777
South Central Correctional Facility 1,671 Tennessee Prison for Women 770 Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex 1192* Turney Center Industrial Complex 1,560 Whiteville Correctional Facility 1,530 West Tennessee State Penitentiary 1,590 System Total 20,260 Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex began housing inmates in January 2016. *TTCC did not house inmates for full year - only 177 days. Source: TDOC Bed Space and Operating Capacities Report
Demographics 57
Demographics by Facility June 30, 2016
AGE 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age
BCCX 50 68 116 204 287 317 401 405 372 216 16 0 38.6 DSNF 72 43 61 70 83 71 91 69 60 17 3 0 46.1 HCCF 41 49 99 166 193 241 326 334 361 174 7 0 38.1 MCCX 43 54 98 143 177 272 344 390 425 281 6 0 36.7 MLCC 5 9 13 25 42 51 78 80 94 31 0 0 36.8 NECX 77 69 128 181 215 241 288 231 227 128 3 0 41.2 NW CX 63 78 143 178 252 305 379 344 377 209 22 5 38.9 RMSI 22 26 37 86 84 95 150 124 90 52 0 0 40.1 SCCF 40 51 98 154 186 230 271 262 232 129 4 0 39.6 TCIX 28 32 72 130 161 201 258 253 246 203 9 0 37.5 TPFW 13 9 37 54 89 120 138 154 129 45 0 0 38.3 TTCC 22 41 66 105 158 200 272 316 308 195 18 0 36.5 WCFA 38 36 71 93 134 169 248 302 275 150 5 0 37.4 W TSP 9 22 46 57 92 100 99 141 149 111 5 0 37.0
SYSTEM 523 587 1,085 1,646 2,153 2,613 3,343 3,405 3,345 1,941 98 5 38.5
RACE SEX Native Asian Black Hispanic American White Male Female
BCCX 7 732 34 5 1674 2149 303 DSNF 3 276 8 2 351 640 0 HCCF 3 954 46 3 985 1991 0 MCCX 2 1033 43 1 1154 2233 0 MLCC 2 161 6 3 256 0 428 NECX 3 770 49 1 965 1788 0 NW CX 5 1151 66 4 1129 2355 0 RMSI 4 409 14 1 338 766 0 SCCF 5 823 52 2 775 1657 0 TCIX 6 784 47 3 753 1593 0 TPFW 2 196 11 2 577 0 788 TTCC 9 829 46 1 816 1701 0
WCFA 2 775 37 1 706 1521 0
W TSP 1 478 11 1 340 831 0
SYSTEM 54 9371 470 30 10819 19225 1519
58 2016 Statistical Abstract
Facility Populations by Primary Offense: June 30, 2016
BCCX DSNF HCCF MCCX MLCC NECX NWCX RMSI SCCF TCIX TPFW TTCC WCFA WTSP Facility Population 2,452 640 1,991 2,233 428 1,788 2,355 766 1,657 1,593 788 1,701 1,521 831 OFFENSE PERSON OFFENSES 35% 63% 44% 41% 44% 60% 45% 55% 60% 51% 38% 44% 46% 48% Homicide 11% 27% 13% 17% 24% 31% 15% 36% 26% 25% 20% 11% 14% 23% Kidnapping 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% Sex Offenses 12% 22% 17% 9% 3% 15% 15% 6% 21% 13% 3% 15% 15% 9% Assault 11% 12% 13% 14% 16% 12% 13% 11% 12% 12% 14% 16% 16% 14% PROPERTY OFFENSES 32% 16% 34% 32% 26% 22% 27% 26% 20% 26% 28% 33% 30% 34% Arson 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0%
Burglary 12% 5% 10% 9% 5% 6% 8% 6% 5% 7% 6% 9% 8% 7% Forgery/Fraud 2% 0% 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% Larceny/Theft 7% 2% 4% 5% 6% 2% 4% 3% 2% 3% 9% 4% 3% 4% Robbery 11% 9% 18% 17% 11% 13% 14% 16% 13% 15% 9% 18% 17% 22% SOCIETAL OFFENSES 24% 17% 15% 21% 20% 13% 21% 15% 14% 19% 24% 20% 18% 12% Drugs/Narcotics 22% 15% 14% 20% 19% 12% 20% 14% 13% 19% 22% 19% 17% 11% Vehicular Homicide/DUI 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% ALL OTHER OFFENSES 9% 4% 7% 5% 10% 5% 6% 3% 5% 4% 10% 4% 6% 5% C/S/F Person* 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% C/S/F Property* 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% C/S/F Societal* 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% Escape 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% All Other** 6% 3% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 2% 3% 2% 5% 2% 4% 4% TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 101% 100% 99% *C/S/F = Refers to non-substantive offenses such as conspiracy, solicitation, facilitation, aiding and abetting, etc. **Includes eight (8) unprocessed judgment orders.
Incidents: FY 2015 – 2016
Incidents FY 2016
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total Rape 0 0 1 0 1 Weapon Offenses 421 432 484 420 1757 Drug Offenses 358 337 337 495 1527 STG Offenses 194 149 185 174 702 Riot 0 0 0 0 0 Sexual Misconduct 319 298 279 369 1265 Assault Assault on Offender 105 104 97 85 391 Assault on Staff 84 96 164 134 478 Death Homicide 0 0 1 1 2 Suicide 1 0 2 1 4 Accidental Death 0 0 0 0 0 Natural Death 25 33 22 27 107 Lethal Injection 0 0 0 0 0 Escape Secure Supervision 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Security 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Security - Work Crew - Supervised 1 0 0 0 1 Minimum Security - Work Crew - Unsupervised 0 0 0 0 0 Furlough/Pass 0 0 0 0 0 Total Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 19.29 18.65 16.91 18.36 73.22 Data source: Incident Report June 30, 2016
Demographics 59
suicide). 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 55 18 87 39 52 81 18 119 108 160 106 124 1342 20100 SYSTEM 0 4 0 6 8 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 9 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 19 17 State 154 1554 WTSP West TN Penitentiary 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 2 2 0 9 5 0 9 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 24 76 1507 Facility WCFA Whiteville Correctional 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 585 Center Turner TTCC Trousdale Correctional
1 7 0 1 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 8 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 33 785 TPFW
TN Prison for Women 6 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 2 0 2 4 0 0 7 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 13 1542 Center TCIX Turney Complex Industrial 201
– 0 0 0 7 3 6 2 4 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 74 21
759 Needs Facility SPND Special DeBerry 5 0 2 3 0 0 0 7 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 20 10 11 22 12 111 1648 Facility SCCF Correctional South Central 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 5 0 2 4 2 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 10 10 770 RMSI Security Institution Maximum Riverbend idents are by definition about a single participant (ex: death or or death (ex: participant single a about definition by are idents 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 13 15 16 10 169 2313 NWCX Complex Northwest Correctional 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 0 6 5 1 0 5 7 2 0 0 2 8 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 66 1784 NECX Complex Northeast Correctional 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 414 Center Luttrell Mark H. MLRC 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 1 0 3 0 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 14 10 173 2101 County Morgan MCCX Complex Correctional 0 3 3 0 0 0 9 2 1 1 6 3 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 16 14 158 1977 County Facility HCCF Hardeman Correctional 0 4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 1 4 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 11 12 14 305 2361 County BCCX Bledsoe Complex Correctional TDOCINCIDENT SUMMARY: FY 201 may include more than one participant while other inc other while participant one than more include may Average Population Average
Incident Description FELONY-OFN FELONY-STAFF FELONY-VISITOR DISRUP SER-INJ-PROP DMG>$500-OPER DISRUP >$500-OPR INJURY-PROP DMG DISRUP OPER >$500 PROP DMG WEAPON OFN-WITHOUT OFN-WEAPON INJURY STAFF-SERIOUS STAFF-INJURY INJURY STAFF-MINOR INJURY STAFF-NO INJURY OFN-SERIOUS OFN-INJURY INJURY OFN-MINOR INJURY OFN-NO INJURY VIS-SERIOUS VIS-INJURY INJURYVIS-MINOR INJURY VIS-NO WEAPON STAFF-WITHOUT STAFF-WEAPON WEAPON VISITOR/GUEST-WITHOUT VISITOR/GUEST - WEAPON OFN-NATURAL DEATH-OFN-EXEC-ELEC CHR OFN-HOMICIDE OFN-EXEC-LETH INJ OFN-SUICIDE OFN-ACCIDENT DUTY) (ON STAFF-HOMICIDE DUTY) (ON STAFF-SUICIDE DUTY) (ON STAFF-ACCIDENT DUTY)-NATURAL (ON STAFF VISITOR VISITOR-HOMICIDE VISITOR-SUICIDE VISITOR-ACCIDENT VISITOR-NATURAL TEMP. CONTROL LOSS THREAT CONTROL LOSS MINOR AFO AFS AFV ARI ARD ARP AOO AOW ASA ASB ASC ASJ ASD ASE ASF ASG ASH ASI ASM ASO ASW AVO AVW DEA DEC DEH DEI DES DOA DEG DEF DED DET DEV DVH DVS DVA DVN DIL DIR DIS ASK e note that incidents reported reported incidents that note e
Death Death Death Death Death Death Death Death Death Death Death Death Death Death Death Arrest Arrest Arrest Arson Arson Arson Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Inc Type Inc Disturbance Disturbance Disturbance Pleas 103.02. policy TDOC with accordance in personnel Operations’ Facility by entered data summarizes report This SOURCE:
60 2016 Statistical Abstract
suicide). 0 5 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 28 72 22 47 20 240 334 175 176 455 646 322 2259 1845 20100 SYSTEM
0 5 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 14 18 27 30 16 State 186 304 1554 WTSP West TN
Penitentiary 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 22 26 26 23 44 177 1507 Facility WCFA Whiteville Correctional 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 13 50 585 118 Center Turner TTCC Trousdale Correctional
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 15 20 31 785 118 TPFW
TN Prison for Women 6 103.02. 5 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 82 75 27 50 55 79 180 1542 Center TCIX Turney Complex Industrial 201
- 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 82 20 759 Needs Facility Special SPND DeBerry 5 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 29 31 13 93 17 17 160 1648 Facility SCCF Correctional South Central 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 29 19 41 39 10 770 150 177 RMSI Security Institution Maximum Riverbend 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 3 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 20 45 82 44 18 238 364 2313 NWCX Complex Northwest Correctional 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 33 46 52 37 24 90 197 1784 NECX Complex Northeast Correctional 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 3 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 20 14 27 414 Center Luttrell Mark H. MLRC 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 6 0 0 0 10 82 35 36 35 66 15 108 371 142 2101 County Morgan Complex MCCX Correctional 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 11 52 13 49 20 285 139 1977 County Facility HCCF Hardeman Correctional 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 5 1 0 0 0 76 86 61 12 32 36 18 34 279 2361 County Bledsoe BCCX Complex Correctional TDOCINCIDENT SUMMARY: FY 201 include more than one participant while other incidents are by definition about a single participant (ex: death or or death (ex: participant single a about definition by are incidents other while participant one than more include
Average Population Average reported may incidents INSIDE SECURE PERIMETER-NO POSS SECURE INSIDE OUTSIDE SECURE PERIMETER AMT-OFN CONFIS-SIGNIF CONFIS-SIGNIF AMT-STAFF AMT-VISITOR CONFIS-SIGNIF CONFISCATION-OFFENDER CONFISCATION-STAFF CONFISCATION-VISITOR PARAPHERNALIA POSSESSION / SELLING / USE ON PROPERTY FOUND INTOXICANTS DISRUPTION MAJOR CUSTODY-ATTEMPT ABSCOND SECURITY CUSTODY-MIN ABSCOND SUPERVISION SECURE SECURITY-VIOLENCE MIN UNIT SECURITY MIN WORK CREW-SUPV SEC MIN UNSUPV CREW WORK SEC MIN FURLOUGH/PASS ATT. SECURE SUPV SECURITY-VIOLENCE ATT.MIN ATT. MIN SECURITY ESCAPE PRIORRETURN FROM TO TOMIS DISRUP SER-INJ-PROP DMG>$500-OPR DISRUP INJ-PROP DMG>$500-OPR DISRUP PROP DMG>$500-OPER ACCIDENT-OFN-SERIOUS RELATED WRK ACCIDENT-OFN ACCIDENT-OFN ACCIDENT-STAFF-SERIOUS ACCIDENT-STAFF ACCIDENT-VISITOR-SERIOUS ACCIDENT-VISITOR INFLICTED-SERIOUSSELF INFLICTEDSELF OFN-SERIOUS-HOSP DUTY) STAFF-SERIOUS-HOSP(ON VISITOR-SERIOUS-HOSP VISITOR CELL INSIDE PERIMETER-NO POSS THREAT BOMB CONTRABAND POSS/USE CELLULAR TEL. DFI DFO DRJ DRS IOP EPA ESA ESP ESU ESR FII FIS IHA INC IOT IVS BTH DRK DRL DRQ DRN DRO DRP ACA ACM ESB ESC ESE ESF ESH ESI FIP IHC IHB IJA IJB ILA ILB INB ISH IVM CIP CON PCT note that Fire Fire Fire Other Other Other Other Injury Injury Injury Injury Injury Injury Injury Injury Injury Drugs Drugs Drugs Drugs Drugs Drugs Drugs Drugs Drugs Drugs Drugs Illness Illness Illness Illness Escape Escape Escape Escape Escape Escape Escape Escape Escape Escape Escape Escape Equip Prob Equip Please Please policy TDOC with accordance in personnel Operations’ Facility by entered data summarizes report This SOURCE:
Demographics 61
0 2 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 58 58 84 27 68 69 335 362 157 888 101 245 457 Total 1265 1485 20100 73.22 14,717 SYSTEM 4 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 46 30 35 79 15 21 20 State 330 259 1554 WTSP WTSP 1,774 West TN 114.16 Penitentiary 0 6 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 70 11 28 91 39 12 21 25
830 1507 Facility 55.07 WCFA WCFA Whiteville Correctional 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 32 41 21 31 22 13 22 42 585 507
Center Turner 86.69 TTCC TTCC Trousdale Correctional 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 18 24 86 785 501 63.86 TPFW TPFW TN Prison for Women
2 4 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 4 6 6 77 42 16 85 24 33 936 1542 Center TCIX TCIX Turney 60.69 Complex Industrial 201 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 5 7 16 23 18 40 20 759 467
Needs Facility Special SPND SPND
61.52 DeBerry –
5 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 53 37 28 34 31 28 261 211 1648 Facility 1,291 SCCF SCCF 78.35
Correctional South Central
2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 7 3 26 29 12 76 16 770 119 894 RMSI RMSI Security 116.08 Institution Maximum Riverbend 9 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 12 80 22 26 15 13 17 35 399 132 2313 1,866 80.67 NWCX NWCX Complex Northwest Correctional 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 5 13 12 12 22 42 126 137 987 1784 55.32 NECX NECX Complex Northeast Correctional 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 1 0 0 10 414 138 Center Luttrell 33.34 Mark H. MLRC MLRC
2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 67 22 14 42 27 46 14 26 143 107 2101 County 1,693 80.59 Morgan Complex MCCX MCCX
Correctional
7 6 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 27 79 44 49 48 123 102 1977 County Facility 1,335 67.53 HCCF HCCF Hardeman Correctional 1 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 93 32 90 20 12 29 25 14 114 2361 County 1,498 63.44 BCCX Bledsoe BCCX Complex Correctional
TDOCINCIDENT SUMMARY: FY 201 TOTAL
Average Population Average
Total 100 - per Rate
Incident Description POSS/USE TOBACCO PROD. TOBACCO POSS/USE PROP DMG>$500 MISCONDUCT SEXUAL RAPE RIOT OPR - DISRUP SABOTAGE SITUATION HOSTAGE EPIDEMIC PUBLIC HEALTH THREAT ACTIVITY PART IN STG POSSESS MATERIAL STG LOCKDOWN-PARTIAL INST LOCKDOWN-TOTAL INST INMATE-OPER.DISRUP STAFF-OPER DISRUP INJURY ATT-SERIOUS ATTEMPT CHEMICAL AGENTS WEAPON DEADLY ELEC RESTRAINTS THANLESS LETHAL MEDICAL PHYSICAL AMMUNITION AMT AMMUNITION-SIGNIF FIREARM COMMERCIAL KNIFE COMMERCIAL EXPLOSIVE AMT EXPLOSIVE-SIGNIF FIREARM NON COMMERCIAL KNIFE NON COMMERCIAL OTHER CLUB RAW MATERIALS A TOOL CLASS TOOL B CLASS
Summary Summary PTO PDA SXM RAP RIO SBT HOS EHT PGA PGM ILP ILT SKI SKS SUA SUC UFC UFD UFE UFL UFM UFP WAB WAM WCF WCK WEB WEX WHF WHK WOT WPC WRM WTA WTB Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Strike Strike Suicide Suicide Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Weapon Inc Type Inc Use of Force Use of Force Use of Force Use of Force Use of Force Use of Force In January 2016, ACA, ACM, ASW, ASO, AOW, AOO, AVW, & AVO codes were added. & AVO codes AVW, AOO, AOW, ASO, were deactivated. codes ASW, & ESU ACM, ESP, ACA, ESE, ASM, 2016, ASI, January ASH, In ASG, ASK, ASF, ASE, ASD, ASJ, ASC, ASB, ASA, 2016, January In In January DRJ 2016, and DRQ were incorporated DRS into In January DRS 2016, was changed from Drug to Drug Selling Possession / Use / Selling An error was detected previous in reports and corrected the within OctoberPlease 2015 report. note Descriptions that incidents of reported IHB & IHC may include more were than one reversed. participant while other incidents areIncident about by definition rates a single participant (per (ex: death 100 inmates) or suicide). are calculated on the basis of the averageSOURCE: inmaate This report by facility population and summarizes system data wide. entered by Facility Operations’ personnel accordance in with TDOC 103.02. policy
62 2016 Statistical Abstract
Demographics of Parolees by District June 30, 2016
AGE District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age
10 36 39 65 104 100 119 119 143 78 11 1 0 43.1 20 45 57 97 118 143 136 201 219 148 38 0 0 41.6 21 27 19 33 55 47 50 89 82 53 15 0 0 42.2 30 66 60 99 116 136 132 182 138 89 15 0 0 44.4 31 29 23 31 55 65 62 78 75 68 17 0 0 42.2 40 0 4 7 9 11 14 24 21 10 2 1 0 39.7 41 38 33 49 90 72 56 78 64 25 2 0 0 46.6 42 66 90 153 170 198 236 340 311 215 61 1 1 41.6 50 33 22 54 83 86 128 166 148 80 22 2 0 41.2 51 28 24 49 49 52 76 88 94 59 10 0 0 42.5 60 23 27 34 68 73 86 115 92 85 26 0 0 41.1 61 32 28 57 73 101 115 150 145 81 23 0 0 41.6 70 7 15 24 42 60 46 38 38 26 2 0 0 43.9 71 19 29 50 71 98 106 132 115 99 26 0 0 40.9 72 39 46 76 118 121 163 215 154 147 60 0 0 41.1 80 24 14 33 43 38 47 65 74 55 5 0 0 42.4 81 25 13 31 51 63 72 93 112 82 28 0 0 40.1 OIC 12 8 21 33 44 45 41 41 20 1 0 0 43.8 Unassigned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SYSTEM 549 551 963 1348 1508 1689 2214 2066 1420 364 5 1 42.1
RACE SEX Native District Asian Black Hispanic American White Male Female
10 2 109 28 1 675 674 141 20 1 269 22 2 908 1003 199 21 0 42 3 1 424 408 62 30 0 265 4 1 763 896 137 31 1 40 9 2 451 395 108 40 2 34 3 0 64 31 72 41 5 228 33 1 240 473 34 42 8 1114 129 2 589 1663 179 50 10 237 32 2 543 708 116 51 1 155 8 2 363 456 73 60 2 383 5 0 239 558 71 61 2 276 5 0 522 704 101 70 0 245 9 0 44 296 2 71 7 525 60 1 152 679 66 72 3 995 16 0 125 1042 97 80 0 127 10 2 259 360 38 81 5 181 15 0 369 503 67 OIC 2 107 16 1 140 232 34 Unassigned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SYSTEM 51 5332 407 18 6870 11081 1597
Demographics 63
Demographics of Probationers by District June 30, 2016
AGE District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age
10 98 129 229 378 455 640 720 753 802 399 20 1 38.4 20 113 128 256 391 515 636 854 999 968 646 47 0 37.2 21 53 64 114 195 299 328 430 572 539 306 20 2 37.0 30 97 116 295 454 589 781 1020 1019 1223 799 60 1 36.7 31 68 66 110 185 203 272 327 384 379 248 12 0 38.2 40 31 76 117 182 270 331 469 553 601 419 36 0 35.8 41 42 65 119 162 175 211 261 318 339 233 10 0 38.0 42 25 32 84 129 128 189 264 335 370 240 19 0 35.9 50 55 66 123 242 289 371 536 616 644 561 53 0 35.7 51 74 67 124 185 236 304 373 425 442 376 33 0 37.2 60 42 45 90 143 187 229 360 371 377 306 18 0 36.5 61 36 50 111 178 209 262 398 411 374 319 38 0 36.8 70 8 4 17 20 23 17 27 27 32 9 1 0 40.7 71 30 57 79 145 244 268 404 542 671 654 47 0 33.7 72 45 76 173 220 272 427 595 690 889 845 66 0 34.3 80 25 33 106 152 192 244 338 463 456 376 17 0 35.5 81 33 54 114 170 207 229 336 453 468 347 18 2 36.1 OIC 184 287 560 818 899 908 1070 909 604 166 2 0 42.8 Unassigned 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57.0 SYSTEM 1059 1415 2822 4349 5392 6647 8782 9840 10178 7249 517 6 37.1
RACE SEX Native District Asian Black Hispanic American White Male Female
10 12 387 70 7 4148 3095 1529 20 16 903 67 15 4552 3986 1567 21 4 166 27 5 2720 2087 835 30 13 1510 86 4 4841 4706 1748 31 3 102 40 3 2106 1534 720 40 23 1750 117 2 1193 2314 771 41 20 1087 58 0 770 1473 462 42 19 1082 69 1 644 1430 385 50 51 823 141 5 2536 2629 927 51 11 496 56 2 2074 1866 773 60 4 1096 26 2 1040 1688 480 61 3 715 24 4 1640 1727 659 70 1 135 5 0 44 172 13 71 19 2296 58 1 767 2329 812 72 10 3716 54 1 517 3253 1045 80 29 625 51 1 1696 1807 595 81 9 510 65 1 1846 1696 735 OIC 35 1969 561 20 3822 5072 1335 Unassigned 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 SYSTEM 282 19368 1575 74 36957 42865 15391
64 2016 Statistical Abstract
Community Supervision Offender Levels of Supervision June 30, 2016 Level of Supervision Parole Probation Special Restricted 19 625 Restricted 359 2587 Elevated 984 1555 Standard 6580 29324 Administrative 3131 22564 PSU 1587 1536 Unassigned 18 65 Totals 12678 58256 Data Source: Tennessee Offender Management System
Minimum Monthly Supervision Level Supervision Type Required Interactions ENHANCED 1 Face to Face in Field 3 Face to Face in Office Special Restricted SANCTIONED or Field 2 Collateral Contacts DRC PHASE 1 Total: 6 Contacts INTAKE 1 Face to Face in Field 2 Face to Face in Office POST VIOLATION or Field Restricted DRC PHASE 2 1 Collateral Contact PSU PHASE ONE Total: 4 Contacts MAXIMUM 1 Face to Face in Field 1 Face to Face in Office RESISTIVE Elevated or Field DRC PHASE 3 1 Collateral Contact PSU PHASE TWO Total: 3 Contacts 1 Face to Face in the MEDIUM Field or Office
Standard MINIMUM or TELEPHONE REPORTING 1 Collateral Contact PSU PHASE THREE Total: 1 Contact Absconder, Deported, Detainer, In Custody on TDOC sentence, Inter-State Compact outgoing, Judicial Suspension of Supervision, Status (Interactions as Administrative Residential Treatment Placement, Suspension of Direct Needed) Supervision, Warrant
Program Supervision Unit Monthly Interactions Each whole number is the required contact each month. Each fraction is the number of contacts / number of months. Example: 1/3 is one
contact every three months Face-to-Face (office) Face-to-Face (field) Collateral Contact Offender Sex Treatment Home Visit Employment Fees Special Conditions Offender Sex Registry Arrest Check Residence Search Drug Screen Polygraph Risk Assessment
PSU Primary 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/3 1 1/3 1/3 1/6 1/6
2 PSU Secondary 1 1 1 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/6 1/6 1/6 1/6 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/9 1/12 1/6 1/12 Standards PSU Intermediate
PSU Supervision 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/12 1/12 1/6 1/12 PSU Transitional Demographics 65
66 2016 Statistical Abstract
Demographics 67
STATISTICAL ABSTRACT USER’S GUIDE
Population, Capacity, & Trends
TDOC Backup: Felons sentenced to TDOC custody and held in local jails while awaiting transfer to a TDOC institution.
Local or Locally Sentenced: Convicted felons sentenced to serve their time in a local jail. As felony offenders, these persons are under TDOC jurisdiction.
Other Convicted Felons: Convicted felons awaiting sentencing or not yet ready for transfer to TDOC because of other pending charges. Includes technical violators awaiting probable cause/revocation/rescission hearing or adjudication of pending charges.
Convicted Misdemeanants: Inmates serving time because of a misdemeanor conviction.
Pre-Trial Felony Detainees: Inmates charged with a felony but not yet convicted.
Pre-Trial Misdemeanant Detainees: Inmates charged with a misdemeanor but not yet convicted.
Others: Inmates held in local facilities for federal crimes, city ordinances, etc.
Community Corrections: A grant program created in 1985 as an alternative to incarceration. Programs are developed based on the individual needs of the area served.
Probation: Felons subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to community supervision without incarceration.
Parole: Felons originally sentenced to an incarceration period and released to serve the remainder of their sentence under community supervision.
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services
Level of Care: An inmate’s need for mental health services based on their ability to function in general population.
Level I: No mental health services are indicated for the inmate. Adjustment and function in the general population is not impaired by mental illness.
68 2016 Statistical Abstract
Level II: Mental health outpatient services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is mildly impaired due to mental illness and/or mental retardation or is not currently impaired but he/she needs monitoring.
Level III: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is moderately impaired due to a serious mental illness. This designation reflects a tenuous mental status that is easily overwhelmed by everyday pressures, demands, and frustrations.
Level IV: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is severely impaired due to serious and persistent mental illness. This level reflects active symptoms of a major mental illness and impaired reality testing.
Demographics
Class A Incidents: Events which involve life threatening matters and breaches of security that are likely to cause serious operational problems, imminent threat to the control and order of a facility and/or to the community
Selected other incidents: Less serious events where injury to staff, visitors and/or inmates may or may not have occurred that cause the disruption of the normal facility operation, or which pose a possible risk to the health or safety of the general public that did not require the involvement of outside agencies in institutional functions, as well as events that pose no threat to the local community, or to the safe and secure operation of the institution.
Please note that most incidents reported in the monthly summary may include more than one participant or infraction while other incidents are by definition about a single participant (ex: death or suicide).
Demographics 69
www.tn.gov/correction
RACHEL JACKSON BUILDING 320 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH NASHVILLE, TN 37243 615-253-8187