DOCSLIB.ORG

NO ESCAPE: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NO ESCAPE: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons NO ESCAPE: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons Human Rights Watch Report, April 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................................................4 PREFACE........................................................................................................................................5 The Scope of this Report .......................................................................................................5 Methodology.........................................................................................................................7 I. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................8 Recommendations................................................................................................................14 CASE HISTORIES OF S.M. AND C.R.........................................................................................19 II. BACKGROUND......................................................................................................................25 The Size and Growth of the U.S. Inmate Population..............................................................25 The Structure of Imprisonment .............................................................................................25 Characteristics of the U.S. Prisoner Population.....................................................................27 Conditions and Abuses ........................................................................................................27 Grievance Mechanisms ........................................................................................................32 Oversight of Treatment and Conditions.................................................................................32 CASE HISTORY OF R.G. .............................................................................................................34 III. LEGAL CONTEXT.................................................................................................................38 National Legal Protections ...................................................................................................38 International Legal Protections..............................................................................................44 CASE HISTORY OF RODNEY HULIN .......................................................................................50 IV. PREDATORS AND VICTIMS ...............................................................................................51 Age .....................................................................................................................................52 Size, Physical Strength, Attitude, and Propensity toward Violence.........................................53 Sexual Preference................................................................................................................55 Race and Ethnicity...............................................................................................................56 Criminal History...................................................................................................................58 Relationship between Victim and Perpetrator........................................................................59 CASE HISTORIES OF L.O. AND P.E. .........................................................................................60 V. RAPE SCENARIOS.................................................................................................................63 Consent and Coercion in Prison...........................................................................................64 Violent or Forcible Assaults .................................................................................................67 Coerced Sexual Abuse ........................................................................................................69 Continuing Sexual Abuse......................................................................................................71 Slavery................................................................................................................................73 Sex, Violence and Power.....................................................................................................75 CASE HISTORIES OF S.H. AND M.R.........................................................................................78 VI. BODY AND SOUL: THE PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY OF PRISON RAPE..................................................................................................................................85 Physical Effects and the Threat of HIV Transmission.............................................................86 Psychological Impact ...........................................................................................................87 Inadequate Treatment ..........................................................................................................94 CASE HISTORIES OF P.N. AND L.T. .........................................................................................95 VII. ANOMALY OR EPIDEMIC: THE INCIDENCE OF PRISONER-ON-PRISONER RAPE.99 Chronic Underreporting .....................................................................................................100 Low Numbers Reported by State Correctional Authorities..................................................101 High Numbers Estimated by Correctional Officers..............................................................103 Findings of Empirical Studies..............................................................................................103 CASE HISTORY OF B.L.............................................................................................................107 VIII. DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE: STATE AUTHORITIES= RESPONSE TO PRISONER- ON PRISONER SEXUAL ABUSE..................................................................................110 Failure to Recognize and Address the ProblemCand the Perverse Incentives Created by Legal Standards..............................................................................................................111 The North Carolina Pilot Program......................................................................................112 Lack of Prisoner Orientation..............................................................................................112 Improper Classification and Negligent Double-Celling.........................................................113 CASE HISTORY OF W.H...........................................................................................................121 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Joanne Mariner, deputy director of the Americas Division of Human Rights Watch, is the author of this report, which is based on research conducted from 1996 to 1999. The research was a collective effort requiring the assistance of a number of Human Rights Watch staff members, interns, and others. Among those who gave generously of their time and ideas were Sahr Muhammedaly, former program associate; Gail Yamauchi, program associate; Kokayi K. Issa, former Leonard Sandler Fellow; Rae Terry, former New York University law student; Anna-Rose Mathieson, former Everett Intern; Emma Algotsson, former intern; Zoe Hilden, former intern; Caroline Flintoft, former intern; Marcia Allina, program associate; and Ali Ehsassi, former intern. Professor Michael Mushlin of Pace University offered helpful suggestions regarding the report=s legal section. During informal discussions on prison issues with Associate Counsel Jamie Fellner, the author gained many insights that inform this report. She would also like to thank Cynthia Brown, former program director of Human Rights Watch, who was a steadfast supporter of the project. The report was edited by Michael McClintock, deputy program director of Human Rights Watch, and Malcolm Smart, program director. Jamie Fellner also provided invaluable editorial comments. Dinah PoKempner, general counsel of Human Rights Watch, reviewed it for legal accuracy. Jonathan Horowitz, program associate, provided production assistance. Generous financial assistance for the research was provided by the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, the Public Welfare Foundation, and John Kaneb. The author wishes to thank the many prisoners who contributed to the report, both by recounting their personal experiences and by offering their thoughts and recommendations on the topic. The report is dedicated to the memory of two exceptional men: the late Justice Harry Blackmun, a former member of the U.S. Supreme Court, notable, among other things, for his eloquent concern for the humane treatment of prisoners, and the late Stephen Donaldson, a former prisoner and tireless activist whose groundbreaking work drew needed attention to the human suffering that is the subject of this report. PREFACE I=ve been sentenced for a D.U.I. offense. My 3rd one. When I first came to prison, I had no idea what to expect. Certainly none of this. I=m a tall white male, who unfortunately has a small amount of feminine characteristics. And very shy. These characteristics have got me raped so many times I have no more feelings physically. I have been raped by up to 5 black men and two white men at a time. I=ve had knifes at my head and throat. I had fought and been beat so hard that I didn=t ever think I=d see straight again. One time when I refused
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Ethnomethodological Investigation of Time in a Prison Clyde Brewster
    THE WNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Doing Time : An Ethnomethodological Investigation of Time in a Prison by Clyde Brewster Freeman III A TIESIS SUMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF OUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY CALGARY, ALBERTA JULY, 1997 O Clyde Brewster Freeman III 1997 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 ofCrnada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services seMces bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, me Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Oüawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence aiiowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or se1 reproduire, prêter, disûi'buer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nIm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author' s ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT This thesis examines how inmates "do time" by making temporal phenomena available through conversation. The study combines techniques of ethnomethodology and ethnography to analyse time-talk occurring in the natural language of prison inmates. The thesis argues that (a) an analysis of doing time is informative of the temporal dimensions of everyday life in the prison and (b) ethnomethodology would benefit from being attentive to time.
    [Show full text]
  • Katharina Jehle*
    LEGISLATING “LEGITIMATE” VICTIMS: HOW THE “JAILHOUSE EXCLUSION” DENIES INMATES THE PROTECTION OF CALIFORNIA’S RAPE SHIELD STATUTE Katharina Jehle* The passage of rape shield statutes protecting victims’ privacy in the 1970s and 1980s changed how the law treats rape victims. However, this rape reform movement gives us the legacy of a puzzling exclusion from California’s rape shield statute for sexual assaults that occur in jail or prison. While sensitive questions about sexual history are off-limits when other victims testify, inmates do not have this protection. Yet since the California Legislature passed what it nicknamed the “jailhouse exclusion” in 1981, society and the law have recognized the existence and impact of prison rape. The jailhouse exclusion is an example of how prison rape survivors face barriers reminiscent of the barriers that all rape victims faced fifty years ago. Since the jailhouse exclusion is perplexing and is incompatible with the rape shield statute’s purpose of protecting victims, this article’s first focus is to tell the story of its origins. It then discusses its impact, especially in light of subsequent legal developments to prevent prison rape, and calls for the California Legislature to repeal it. It is important to reconsider the jailhouse exclusion because of its message: while most rape victims are spared questions about their past sexual history—questions that have no bearing on consent—it is OK to put an inmate-victim on trial. There are enough barriers to eliminating prison rape; it is time to remove this one from the California Evidence Code. * Deputy District Attorney at the Napa County District Attorney’s Office; J.D., University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, 2014; B.S., The College of William and Mary, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary: a Historic Landscape of Incarceration
    BRUSHY MOUNTAIN STATE PENITENTIARY: A HISTORIC LANDSCAPE OF INCARCERATION by Kelli Gibson A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History Middle Tennessee State University August 2018 Thesis Committee: Dr. Carroll Van West, Chair Dr. Louis Kyriakoudes ABSTRACT This thesis explores the history of Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary and its role in shaping the cultural and physical landscapes of Morgan County, Tennessee. It begins with the historic prison’s origins and traces its development into a twentieth century state penitentiary. Considering the impact of both historic and contemporary practices of incarceration on the region, the thesis argues that Morgan County’s history of imprisonment had a profound and persisting impact on local identity. The thesis then considers the adaptive reuse of former prisons, using the current tourism redevelopment of Brushy Mountain as a case study highlighting the ways in which imprisonment continues to shape the region’s legacy. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER ONE: ORIGINS, DEVELOPMENT, AND EARLY LANDSCAPE, 1893-1935 ........ 6 CHAPTER TWO: THE SHAPING OF A TWENTIETH CENTURY CARCERAL LANDSCAPE, 1966-2009 ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976 - 2010 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cj970ps Author Reiter, Keramet A. Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976 - 2010 By Keramet A. Reiter A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Franklin E. Zimring, Chair Professor Jonathon Simon Professor Marianne Constable Professor David Sklansky Spring 2012 Abstract The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976 - 2010 by Keramet A. Reiter Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Franklin E. Zimring, Chair Concrete, steel, artificial light, complete technological automation, near-complete sensory deprivation, and total isolation – these are the basic conditions of supermaximum security prisons in the United States. “Supermax” prisoners remain alone twenty-three to twenty-four hours a day, under fluorescent lights that are never turned off. Meals arrive through a small slot in an automated cell door. Prisoners have little to no human contact for months, years, or even decades at a time, save brief interactions with correctional officers, who place hand, ankle, and waist cuffs on each prisoner before removing him from his cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Correctional Data Analysis Systems. INSTITUTION Sam Honston State Univ., Huntsville, Tex
    I DocdnENT RESUME ED 209 425 CE 029 723 AUTHOR Friel, Charles R.: And Others TITLE Correctional Data Analysis Systems. INSTITUTION Sam Honston State Univ., Huntsville, Tex. Criminal 1 , Justice Center. SPONS AGENCY Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. Bureau of Justice Statistics. PUB DATE 80 GRANT D0J-78-SSAX-0046 NOTE 101p. EDRS PRICE MF01fPC05Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Computer Programs; Computers; *Computer Science; Computer Storage Devices; *Correctional Institutions; *Data .Analysis;Data Bases; Data Collection; Data Processing; *Information Dissemination; *Iaformation Needs; *Information Retrieval; Information Storage; Information Systems; Models; State of the Art Reviews ABSTRACT Designed to help the-correctional administrator meet external demands for information, this detailed analysis or the demank information problem identifies the Sources of teguests f6r and the nature of the information required from correctional institutions' and discusses the kinds of analytic capabilities required to satisfy . most 'demand informhtion requests. The goals and objectives of correctional data analysis systems are ontliled. Examined next are the content and sources of demand information inquiries. A correctional case law demand'information model is provided. Analyzed next are such aspects of the state of the art of demand information as policy considerations, procedural techniques, administrative organizations, technology, personnel, and quantitative analysis of 'processing. Availa4ie software, report generators, and statistical packages
    [Show full text]
  • 1- in the United States District Court for the Middle
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ROBERT CARMEN, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 3:20-cv-01105 § CORECIVIC OF TENNESSEE, LLC, § JURY DEMANDED as owner and operator of TROUSDALE § TURNER CORRECTIONAL CENTER, § EMMANUEL AKINYELE, and § LORRIE HENSON. § § Defendants. § PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE of the Plaintiff’s filing of the following twenty-nine (29) news articles regarding the Defendant CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, and the facility at issue in this lawsuit: 1. Attachment #1: Demetria Kalodimos, Woman says she paid off gangs to keep son safe in prison, WSMV (Oct. 5, 2017), https://www.wsmv.com/news/woman- says-she-paid-off-gangs-to-keep-son-safe-in-prison/article_a4e670ea-78be-5087-86e5- a65ecd485475.html; 2. Attachment #2: Joseph Wenzel, Over 1,200 staff, inmates test positive for COVID-19 at Trousdale Turner Correctional Center, WSMV (May 1, 2020), https://www.wsmv.com/news/over-1-200-staff-inmates-test-positive-for-covid-19-at- trousdale-turner-correctional-center/article_568c03d2-8bde-11ea-a447- 4b7eaabeb67b.html; -1- Case 3:20-cv-01105 Document 15 Filed 02/01/21 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 568 3. Attachment #3: Adam Tamburin, Tennessee prison inmate dies after fight at Trousdale Turner, THE TENNESSEAN (Jan. 26, 2020), https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2020/01/26/tennessee-prison-inmate-dies- after-fight-trousdale-turner-correctional-center/4581013002/; 4. Attachment #4: Dave Boucher, New Tennessee CCA prison stops taking inmates amid 'serious issues,' THE TENNESSEAN (May 24, 2016), https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2016/05/24/new-tennessee-private- prison-stops-taking-inmates/84867834/; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside When Shortness of Breath, and Pneumonia
    Prison Legal News PUBLISHED BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER VOL. 31 No. 4 April 2020 ISSN 1075-7678 Dedicated to Protecting Human Rights Protect Yourself and Your Facility from COVID-19 by Michael D. Cohen, M.D. Introduction trust rumors. False information is widely ity have mild symptoms like a common circulating already. cold, including runny nose, sneezing, mild he novel coronavirus is now a Residential institutions with congregate cough and possibly some nausea, vomiting Tglobal pandemic and is widespread in living like boarding schools, mental hospitals, or diarrhea. On average, symptoms develop the United States, causing a disease called homeless shelters and prisons or jails bring about 5 days after infection, but patients COVID-19. It is likely that a majority together a large number of people into a are infectious to others starting 2 or 3 days of the population will eventually become very small space for prolonged periods of before symptoms start. infected with this virus. Here is some in- time. Communicable diseases are readily Therefore, people who are feeling formation about the coronavirus and some introduced from outside and spread more well can still be infectious and spread the thoughts about taking care of yourself and easily where people live in close quarters. virus to others. your facility during this pandemic. Rec- Coronavirus is coming to all of us in Some patients develop more severe ommendations are changing daily as the the free world. Prisons and jails will likely disease with symptoms such as fever, cough, virus spreads more widely. Try to get newer be hard hit, with rapid spread inside when shortness of breath, and pneumonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee State Library and Archives Department of Economic And
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives Department of Economic and Community Development Entertainment Commission Records, 1976-2014 RG 411 COLLECTION SUMMARY Creator: Tennessee. Film, Entertainment and Music Commission Inclusive Dates: 1976-2014 Scope & Content: Consists of Department of Economic and Community Development Entertainment Commission records from 1976-2014. Series I consists of correspondence, schedules, screenplays and other project materials related to the activities of the Tennessee Entertainment Commission. Series II consists of audiovisual material. Series III consists of photographic material. The audiovisual and photographic material in this collection (Boxes 21-42) resides in a climate- controlled vault (X-B-1v to X-C-1v). Access requires a 24-hour notice to allow items to acclimate before use. Series IV consists of electronic records. Physical Description/Extent: 35.5 cubic feet + 73 megabytes Accession/Record Group Number: RG 411 Language: English 1 Permanent Location: RG 411 Repository: Tennessee State Library and Archives, 403 Seventh Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee, 37243-0312 Administrative/Biographical History The General Assembly established the Tennessee Entertainment Commission in 1979. The Commission works to attract film, television, music, and other entertainment producers to the state, while assisting the current entertainment industry cluster within Tennessee. The Commission is under the Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development. (From Tennessee Blue Book 1987-1988 and 2017-2018) Organization/Arrangement of Materials Series List for Physical Records I. Project Files II. Audiovisual Materials III. Photographic Materials IV. Electronic Records Conditions of Access and Use Restrictions on Access: The audio material in this collection resides in a climate-controlled vault.
    [Show full text]
  • Odyssey: a Prison Magazines Difficultjourlney
    A PROJECT OF THE AMERICAN CIVil LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, INC. VOL 8, NO.1, WINTER 1993 • ISSN9748-2655 \ Odyssey: APrison Magazines DifficultJourlney shape their content by viewing everything lasting impact on the interpretation of in the context of security. In short, they prisoners' First Amendment rights was exercise censorship. brought in July of 1988 by Dannie Martin merica has a long tradition of prison To make matters worse, the Supreme and the San Francisco Chronicle. Martin, journalism. For more than a century, Court and the lower federal courts have a prisoner at the U.S. penitentiary in Aprisoners have established journals consistently weakened prisoners' First Lompoc, California at the time, had written to communicate their interests within the Amendment rights during the past 10 more than 40 articles under his byline prisons and to carry their voices into the years. In Turner v. Safley! for example, during a two-year period for the San community. Despite the hundreds of jour- the Court established that "...censored Francisco Chronicle, openly and without material must objection by Federal Bureau of Prisons offi­ bear a reason­ cials. When he wrote an article describing able relationship rising tensions in Lompoc and criticizing to security." the policies of the new warden, he was • Although the placed in solitary confinement and hastily court did affirm transferred to a federal prison in Phoenix. that prisoners Martin was charged with violating prison have First regulations because he had "acted as a Amendment reporter and published under a byline" and rights, the practi­ because he had "conducted a business." cal effect of the In an opinion delivered by federal dis­ ruling was to trict court judge Charles A.
    [Show full text]
  • Alicja Dziedzic-Rawska Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Plac Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland
    LUBLIN STUDIES IN MODERN LANGUAGES AND LITERATURE 40(1), 2016, HTTP://WWW.LSMLL.UMCS.LUBLIN.PL, HTTP://LSMLL.JOURNALS.UMCS.PL Alicja Dziedzic-Rawska Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Plac Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland Linguistic creativity in American prison settings ABSTRACT Prison facilities are special: they are complexes defined by a variety of parameters, whose understanding for an ordinary person is far from perfect. It may be observed that two main cultures clash in prisons: that of jailers and that of inmates. Both groups have different rules of conduct, which results in many misunderstandings and new norms of behaviour created on a daily basis. This, in turn, gives way to a constant creation of unique vocabulary specific to the institution, its inhabitants and employees. It may be said that under such conditions prison language thrives: prison slang is extremely changeable and adapts itself to the current needs of the facility. Thus, the level of linguistic creativity is tremendously high: prisoners base their vocabulary loosely on similarities between animate and inanimate beings, which leads to the development of highly figurative language. The research undertaken here focuses on linguistic creativity in American prison settings, and by doing so, draws attention to the originality and unconventionality of prison slang. Keywords: Conceptual Blending Theory; prison slang; linguistic creativity 1, Introduction Linguistic creativity has been one of the notions in the foreground of linguistic interest. A couple of decades ago it was defined as the 6682 Alicja Dziedzic-Rawska ability to produce infinitely many original utterances or sentences that are based on a limited number of lexemes and grammatical constructions (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dictionary Legend
    THE DICTIONARY The following list is a compilation of words and phrases that have been taken from a variety of sources that are utilized in the research and following of Street Gangs and Security Threat Groups. The information that is contained here is the most accurate and current that is presently available. If you are a recipient of this book, you are asked to review it and comment on its usefulness. If you have something that you feel should be included, please submit it so it may be added to future updates. Please note: the information here is to be used as an aid in the interpretation of Street Gangs and Security Threat Groups communication. Words and meanings change constantly. Compiled by the Woodman State Jail, Security Threat Group Office, and from information obtained from, but not limited to, the following: a) Texas Attorney General conference, October 1999 and 2003 b) Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Security Threat Group Officers c) California Department of Corrections d) Sacramento Intelligence Unit LEGEND: BOLD TYPE: Term or Phrase being used (Parenthesis): Used to show the possible origin of the term Meaning: Possible interpretation of the term PLEASE USE EXTREME CARE AND CAUTION IN THE DISPLAY AND USE OF THIS BOOK. DO NOT LEAVE IT WHERE IT CAN BE LOCATED, ACCESSED OR UTILIZED BY ANY UNAUTHORIZED PERSON. Revised: 25 August 2004 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A: Pages 3-9 O: Pages 100-104 B: Pages 10-22 P: Pages 104-114 C: Pages 22-40 Q: Pages 114-115 D: Pages 40-46 R: Pages 115-122 E: Pages 46-51 S: Pages 122-136 F: Pages 51-58 T: Pages 136-146 G: Pages 58-64 U: Pages 146-148 H: Pages 64-70 V: Pages 148-150 I: Pages 70-73 W: Pages 150-155 J: Pages 73-76 X: Page 155 K: Pages 76-80 Y: Pages 155-156 L: Pages 80-87 Z: Page 157 M: Pages 87-96 #s: Pages 157-168 N: Pages 96-100 COMMENTS: When this “Dictionary” was first started, it was done primarily as an aid for the Security Threat Group Officers in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ).
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance of Communication with Incarcerated People
    “You Gota Watch What You Say”: Surveillance of Communication with Incarcerated People Kentrell Owens∗ Camille Cobb Lorrie Faith Cranor [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A. Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A. Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A. ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION Surveillance of communication between incarcerated and non- The United States (U.S.) has the highest incarceration rate and incarcerated people has steadily increased, enabled partly by techno- the largest population of incarcerated people1 in the world [107]. logical advancements. Third-party vendors control communication Nearly half (45 percent) of adults in the U.S. (113 million people tools for most U.S. prisons and jails and ofer surveillance capabili- nationwide) have an immediate family member who has spent at ties beyond what individual facilities could realistically implement. least one night in jail or prison [28]. About 1 in 7 adults has a close Frequent communication with family improves mental health and family member — defned as a parent, child, sibling, partner or a post-carceral outcomes for incarcerated people, but does discom- spouse — who was imprisoned for at least one year [28]. fort about surveillance afect how their relatives communicate with Incarcerated people in the United States are under near-constant them? To explore this and the understanding, attitudes, and reac- surveillance, particularly when communicating with people who tions to surveillance, we conducted 16 semi-structured interviews are not incarcerated. Attorney-client communication is privileged with participants who have incarcerated relatives. Among other and has some legal protections from surveillance [2], but other fndings, we learn that participants communicate despite privacy communication does not.
    [Show full text]