DOCSLIB.ORG

I , , O "Anaijrsis : #"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

,~'f" If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ,,;-,,-,'!.., .. ~---.... -'~ .~-'-- •.• --------- ------~~ ----------------- " o e- c, : ___~~_~, ,."'.,..r___ ........... ~""'~ .... ~ .. ,,...:::.:..)~i.::~' ,I '~ U.S. DeP. artn1ent of Jpstice , 1/ - ' ilr~1) Bureau of Justice Statistics l .:.;.,'~.;.; r .';;;" Ii .' ~. 1· " l,I , " '." I -, D National Criminal Justice Reference Service \1 ../ £ o : '1- i: Corr~ctioqal .._~~;:t I)f '1 = ! D, a,taO ",,- ,.:- . U " .1 ;1, ! o #" This microfiche was produced from documents received for .\ "Anaijrsis : h: .' inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise :1 u control over the physical condition of the documents submitted I l Systems" ' the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on ' ;r.;. il." i this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. I , " I- \ Annual' Report , ~ The Correctional "rr: \ ·1; Con~ept$ 'td Ex~ples h I . I 2 8 2 5 11/// . 11111 . H ~ .1 1.0 = I' I]gw I~~ 22. I!.lJ W~ () 1.\2 W 1")4,0 0 '" UQji • L::. .. 1.1 lilt."' I --- ill} <J~) " 11"1~·25 11111 1.4 .--II II! 1.6 I { MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART N~TIONAL8UREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A o £ o o ",. I Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with ~ I the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. , \ Points of view or opinions stated in this document are \) those of the author(s) and do not represent the official o position or policies of the U. S. Depaliment of Justice. National Institute of Justice o United States Department of Justicle , I - '0 , , Washington, D. C. 20531 i . ,.. -- ~-=-:/.: Bureau of Justice Statistics Reports T~ ponp~,d Public Opinion: An Analysis Trends In E~pendlture ,and Employment Data-· -at Victimization and Attitude Data from . for the CrIminal Jusll,ce System,1971-77 / Single caples are available at no charge from the 13 American Oitles. NOJ-42018 (annual), NCJ-57463 n National Cdmlnal Jus!lce Reference Service, B!lx An Introduction to the National Crime ElIpendUure nnd Emplo;yment Data lor t~) 61l00, Rockville, Md. 20850. Multiple caples are for Survey, NCJ-4~732 Criminal Jusllce Syste'm (annu<ll) \/' sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Compensating Victims 01 Violent Crime: 1978 Summary Report, NCJ-66483 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Potential Costs and Coverage of a National 1978 final report, NCJ-66482 20402. Program. NCJ-43387 1977 final report, NCJ-!i320B Crime Against Persons In Urban, Suburban, THE CORRECTIONAL ANNUAL REPORT: and Rural Areas: A Comparative Analysis at National Crime Survey: Victimization Rates. NCJ-53551 Dictionary 01 Criminal Justice Data Terminology: Criminal Vlctlmlzallon In the United States Rape Victimization In 26 American CIties, terms and Definitions Proposed for Interstate and National Data Collection and Exchange. CONCEPTS -'}ND EXAMPLES (annual): NCJ-55878 Summary Findings of 1977-78 Changes in Criminal Victimization In Urban Schools, NCJ-36747 Crime and of Trends Since 1973. NCJ- NCJ-56396· 61368 Criminal Jusllce Agencies III the U.S.: A Description of Trends from 1973 to 1977. National Prisoner Statistics: Summary Report of the Nlltional Criminal NCJ-59898 capital Punishment (annual): Justice Agency List. NCJ-S5560 1978 (final report). NCJ·66480 1978. NCJ-59897 Criminal Jusllce A.gencles In Region 1977. NCJ-58725 1979 advance' report. NCJ- 67705 1: Conn,. Maine. Mass" N,H" R,I., VI.. 1976, NCJ-49543 Prisoners In State and Federallnstltullons on NCJ-17930 1975, NCJ-44593 December 31: 2: N,J .• N,Y,. NCJ-17931 Roger L. Pennel 1974, NCJ·39467 1978. NCJ-64671 3: Del" D.C.• Md., Pa., Va" W.Va,. NCJ-17932 1973. NCJ-34732 1979 advance report. NCJ-66522 4: Ala .• Ga .• Fla •• i:y .. Miss •• N,C.. S,C .. Tenn .. The Cost 01 Negligence: Losses from Census of State Correctional FaCilities, 1974 NCJ-17933 Charles M. Friel Preventable Household Burglaries. advance report. NCJ-25642 5: III.. Ind. Mich,. Minn .• Ohio; Wis .• NCJ- NCJ-53527 Profile 01 State Prison Inmates: Socio­ 17934 Harriett J. Allie Intimate Victims: A Study 01 Violence Among demographic Findings from the 1974 Survey 6: Ark,. La., N.Mex., Okla .• Tex .. NCJ-17935 Friends and Relatives. NCJ-62319 of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities. 7: Iowa. Kans .• Mo,. Nebr•• NCJ-17936 Crime and Seasonality, NCJ-64818 NCJ-58257 8: Colo" Mont., N.Dak,. S.Dak .• Utah. Wyo .• 'l'l~ Barbara L. Hart Criminal Vlctlmlzallon 01 New York State CenStls of Prisoners In State Correctional NCJ-17937 ri Residents, 1974-71, NCJ-66481 Facililles. 1973, NCJ-347.29 9: Ariz .• Calif.. Hawaii. Nev,. NCJ-15i51 Criminal Victlmlzallon Surveys In 13 Census of Jails and Survey of ,Jail Inmates. 10: Alaska. Idaho. Oreg .. Wash,. NCJ-1793/l American cIties (summary report, 1 vol.), 1978, preliminary report. NCJ-55172 ~0_ NCJ-18471 Prollle of Inmates of Local Jails: Socio­ Boston, NCJ-34818 demographic Findings from the 1978 Survey Buffalo, NCJ-34820 of Inmates of Local Jails, NCJ-65412 l,l',tilization of Criminal Justice Statistics Clnclnnall, NCJ-34819 The Nation's Jails: A report on the census Plroject: Houston, NCJ-34821 of jails from the 1972 Surveyol inmates of Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statlsllcs Miami, NCJ-:l4822 Local Jails. NCJ-190B7 1979 (annual). NCJ-59679 Milwaukee, NCJ-34823 Survey of Inmates of Local Jails, 1972, I'ublic Opinion Regarding Crime, Criminal Minneapolis, NCJ-34824 advance report. NCJ-13313 Justice, and Related Topics. NCJ-17419 New Orleans, NCJ-34825 New Directions in Processing of Juvenile Oakland, NCJ-34826 Uniform Parole Reports: , Offenders: The Denver Model. NCJ-17420 Plttsbur9h, NCJ-34827 Parole In the United States (annual): Who Gets DetaIned? An Empirical Analysis San DIego, NCJ-34828 1978, NOJ-58722 of the Pre-Adjudicatory Detention of San Francisco, NCJ-34829 1976 and 1977, NCJ-49702 ! Juveniles in Denver, NCJ-17417 Washington, D.C., NCJ-34830 Characteristics of the Parole J~venlle Dispositions: Social and Legal PublicAllltudes About Crime (13vols.): Population, 1978, NCJ-66479 I' Factors Related to the Processing of Denver .Prepared for the Bureau of Justice Statistics Boston, NCJ-46235 A Nallonal Survey of Parole-Related 'I Delinquency Cases. NCJ-17418 Buffalo, NCJ-46236 Legislation Enacted During the 1979 Cllfender-Based Transaction Statistics: New Clnclnnall, NCJ-46237 Legislative Session. NCJ-64218 Directions In Data Collection and Repprting. U. S. Departnlent of Justice Houston, NCJ-46238 NCJ-29645 Miami, NOJ-46239 Children In Custody: Jovenile Detention and Sentencing of California Felony Ollenders. Milwaukee, NCJ-46240 Correctional Facility Census NCJ-29646 Grant Nurnber: 80-BJ-CX-0003 Minneapolis, NCJ-46241 1977 -s<dvance report: The Judicial Processing of Assault and New Orleans, NCJ-46242 "t;:;.;;~us of PubliC Juvenile Facilities, Burglary Offenders in Selected California Oaleland, NCJ-46243 r· NCJ-60967 " Counties. NOJ-29644 U.S. Department of Justice Plllsburgh, NCJ-46244 Census of Private Juvenile Facilities. Pre-Adjudicatory Detention in Three Juvenile National Institute of Justice San Diego, NCJ-46245 NCJ-60968 Courts, NCJ-34730 San FranCisco, NCJ-46246 (.1 1975 (final report). NCJ-58139 Delinquency Dispositions: An Empirical This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the 1974, NCJ-57946 Washhigton, D.C., NCJ-46247 Analysis of Processing Decisions in Three or organization originating it, Points view or opinions stated 1973, NCJ-44777 pers~n 01 Criminal Victimization Surveys In Chicago, Juvenil~\Courts. NCJ-34734 In thiS document are those of the authors and do not necessarily Detroit, Los Angeles, New York, and 1971. NCJ-13403 loe Patterns and Distribution of Assault repr~sent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Philadelphia: A Comparison of 1972 and Incident Characteristics Among Social Juslice, 1974 Findings, NCJ-36360 Myths and Realities About Crime: A Areas. NCJ-40025 Criminal Victimization Surveys In the Nontechnical Presentation of Selected Patterns 01 Robbery Characteristics and Their Permission to reproduce this ~ted material has been Nation's Five Largest Cities: National Information from the National Prisoner I>ccurrence Among Social Areas. NCJ-40026 granted py. Crime Panel Surveys in Chicago. Detroit. Statistics Program and the National Crime Cr.lme-Spec'flc Analysis: Los Angeles. New York. and Philadelphia. Survey. NCJ-46249 The Ch.::racterisiics of Burglary Incidents. PUblic Domain/Bureau of Justice 1972. NCJ-16909 NCJ-42093 StatlstlcslUS Dept. of Justice Criminal Vlcllmlzatlon Surveys In Eight State and Local Probation and Parole Syslems, An EmpiricalExamlnation of Burglary American Cllles: A Comparison of 1971172 NCJ-41335 Offender Characteristics. NCJ-43131'· to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS), ami 1974175 Findings-National Crime state and Local Prosecution a·nd Civil Allorney An Empirical Examination of Burglary Surveys in Atlanta. Baltimore. Cleveland. Systems, NCJ-41334 Offenders alid Offense Characteristics, Dallas. Denver. Newark. Portland. and SI. National Survey of Court Organization: ~urther reprodUction outside of Ihe NCJRS system n lquires permis­ NCJ-42476 sion of the ~ht owner, Louis. NCJ-36361 1977 Supplement to State JudiCia:! Systems. Sources 01 National Criminal Judice Crimes and Vlcllms: A Report on the Dayton! NCJ-40022 Statistics: An Annotated Bibliography. San Jose Pilot Survey of Victimization. 1975 Supplement to State JudiCial Systems. NCJ-45006 NCJ·013314 NCJ-29433 Federal Criminal Sente.,clng: Perspectives Indicators 01 Crime and Criminal Jusllce: 1971 (full report). NCJ-11427 of Analysis and a Design for Research, Quantitative Studies. NCJ-62349 NCJ-33683 State Court Model Statistical Dlcllonary, Variations In Federal Crimina! Sentences; Applications of the National Crime NCJ-62320 I) A Statistical Assessment at the National Criminal Justice Center \ Survey Victlmizat~on and Altilude Data= State Court Caseload Stallstlcs: Level. NCJ-336B4 Public OpinIon About Crime: The Attitudes The State of the Art, NCJ-46934 Federal Sentencing Palterns;A Study 01 of Victims and Nonvictims in Selected Annual Report. 1975. NCJ-51885 Geographical Variations. NCJ.33685 Sam Houston State University Cities. NCJ-41336 Annual Report, 1976.
Recommended publications
  • Case 5:15-Cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 1 of 72

    Case 5:15-Cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 1 of 72

    Case 5:15-cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 1 of 72 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION ________________________________ ) TIMOTHY GUMM, on behalf of ) himself and a class of similarly ) situated persons, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION v. ) ) NO. 5:15-CV-41-MTT-CHW TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant ) Commissioner, Georgia Department ) SECOND AMENDED of Corrections, ) COMPLAINT ) RICKY MYRICK, Assistant ) CLASS ACTION Commissioner, Georgia Department ) of Corrections, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) STEVE UPTON, Director of Field ) Operations, Georgia Department of ) Corrections, ) ) RICK JACOBS, Former Director of ) Facilities Operations, Georgia ) Department of Corrections, ) ) RANDY TILLMAN, Former Director ) of Facilities Operations, Georgia ) Department of Corrections, ) ) ERIC SELLERS, Warden, Georgia ) Diagnostic & Classification Prison, ) ) BRUCE CHATMAN, Former Warden, ) Georgia Diagnostic & Classification ) Prison, ) ) Case 5:15-cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 2 of 72 MICHAEL CANNON, Superintendent, ) Special Management Unit, ) ) RODNEY MCCLOUD, Former ) Superintendent, Special Management ) Unit, ) ) WILLIAM POWELL, Deputy Warden ) of Security, Special Management Unit, ) ) JUNE BISHOP, Former Deputy ) Warden of Security, Special ) Management Unit, ) ) RUFUS LOGAN, Former Unit ) Manager, Special Management Unit, ) ) DWAIN WILLIAMS, Chief of ) Security, Special Management Unit, ) ) MARGARET WASHINGTON, ) Former Food Service Director, ) Georgia Diagnostic & Classification ) Prison, ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ ) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff Timothy Gumm respectfully files this amended complaint for damages and declaratory and injunctive relief on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated prisoners. In support thereof, Gumm alleges the following: 2 Case 5:15-cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 3 of 72 INTRODUCTION 1.
  • Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary: a Historic Landscape of Incarceration

    Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary: a Historic Landscape of Incarceration

    BRUSHY MOUNTAIN STATE PENITENTIARY: A HISTORIC LANDSCAPE OF INCARCERATION by Kelli Gibson A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History Middle Tennessee State University August 2018 Thesis Committee: Dr. Carroll Van West, Chair Dr. Louis Kyriakoudes ABSTRACT This thesis explores the history of Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary and its role in shaping the cultural and physical landscapes of Morgan County, Tennessee. It begins with the historic prison’s origins and traces its development into a twentieth century state penitentiary. Considering the impact of both historic and contemporary practices of incarceration on the region, the thesis argues that Morgan County’s history of imprisonment had a profound and persisting impact on local identity. The thesis then considers the adaptive reuse of former prisons, using the current tourism redevelopment of Brushy Mountain as a case study highlighting the ways in which imprisonment continues to shape the region’s legacy. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER ONE: ORIGINS, DEVELOPMENT, AND EARLY LANDSCAPE, 1893-1935 ........ 6 CHAPTER TWO: THE SHAPING OF A TWENTIETH CENTURY CARCERAL LANDSCAPE, 1966-2009 ............................................................................................................
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976 - 2010 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cj970ps Author Reiter, Keramet A. Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976 - 2010 By Keramet A. Reiter A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Franklin E. Zimring, Chair Professor Jonathon Simon Professor Marianne Constable Professor David Sklansky Spring 2012 Abstract The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976 - 2010 by Keramet A. Reiter Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Franklin E. Zimring, Chair Concrete, steel, artificial light, complete technological automation, near-complete sensory deprivation, and total isolation – these are the basic conditions of supermaximum security prisons in the United States. “Supermax” prisoners remain alone twenty-three to twenty-four hours a day, under fluorescent lights that are never turned off. Meals arrive through a small slot in an automated cell door. Prisoners have little to no human contact for months, years, or even decades at a time, save brief interactions with correctional officers, who place hand, ankle, and waist cuffs on each prisoner before removing him from his cell.
  • Thompson Ehle Company MEP/FP, CIVIL, TSYS ENGINEERING

    Thompson Ehle Company MEP/FP, CIVIL, TSYS ENGINEERING

    Thompson Ehle Company engineering excellence for 40 years MEP/FP, CIVIL, TSYS ENGINEERING PORTFOLIO A COLLECTION OF QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE WHO WE ARE Our History Our Philosophy Our Approach & Executive Summary Sustainable Design 1Our Capabilities Our History Founded in 1977 by W. L. Thompson, Thompson Ehle Company offers a comprehensive package of engineering services including: Mechanical Engineering Civil Engineering + Water Features Design Electrical Engineering + Lighting Design Technology Infrastructure Design Plumbing/Fire Protection Engineering Commissioning + Facility Assessment Our Philosophy Our business, consulting engineering, is a balance of art and science based on a foundation of knowledge and skills acquired through years of study and practical experience. To be successful, any Project must subscribe to total organizational loyalty. The 3-tier commitment includes: • Designing to ethical and professional standards • Providing the client with engineering solutions • Delivering a quality product on time and in budget The design approach includes planning, organization, proper staffing, effective direction, and control over the decision-making process. In order to provide proper up-front planning of a project, six planning elements must be considered and implemented at the beginning of the project. These elements must be maintained and/or adjusted as needed as the project moves through development. The six planning elements include: Establish realistic objective Budget efforts to accomplish tasks Program tasks to achieve objectives Identify and resolve constraints to design process Schedule tasks in a sequential time-frame Devise strategies to ensure profitability and success Our Approach In the TEC organization it is the Project Manager’s task to establish realistic objectives to be accomplished by the Team during the development of a project.
  • Correctional Data Analysis Systems. INSTITUTION Sam Honston State Univ., Huntsville, Tex

    Correctional Data Analysis Systems. INSTITUTION Sam Honston State Univ., Huntsville, Tex

    I DocdnENT RESUME ED 209 425 CE 029 723 AUTHOR Friel, Charles R.: And Others TITLE Correctional Data Analysis Systems. INSTITUTION Sam Honston State Univ., Huntsville, Tex. Criminal 1 , Justice Center. SPONS AGENCY Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. Bureau of Justice Statistics. PUB DATE 80 GRANT D0J-78-SSAX-0046 NOTE 101p. EDRS PRICE MF01fPC05Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Computer Programs; Computers; *Computer Science; Computer Storage Devices; *Correctional Institutions; *Data .Analysis;Data Bases; Data Collection; Data Processing; *Information Dissemination; *Iaformation Needs; *Information Retrieval; Information Storage; Information Systems; Models; State of the Art Reviews ABSTRACT Designed to help the-correctional administrator meet external demands for information, this detailed analysis or the demank information problem identifies the Sources of teguests f6r and the nature of the information required from correctional institutions' and discusses the kinds of analytic capabilities required to satisfy . most 'demand informhtion requests. The goals and objectives of correctional data analysis systems are ontliled. Examined next are the content and sources of demand information inquiries. A correctional case law demand'information model is provided. Analyzed next are such aspects of the state of the art of demand information as policy considerations, procedural techniques, administrative organizations, technology, personnel, and quantitative analysis of 'processing. Availa4ie software, report generators, and statistical packages
  • 1- in the United States District Court for the Middle

    1- in the United States District Court for the Middle

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ROBERT CARMEN, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 3:20-cv-01105 § CORECIVIC OF TENNESSEE, LLC, § JURY DEMANDED as owner and operator of TROUSDALE § TURNER CORRECTIONAL CENTER, § EMMANUEL AKINYELE, and § LORRIE HENSON. § § Defendants. § PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE of the Plaintiff’s filing of the following twenty-nine (29) news articles regarding the Defendant CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, and the facility at issue in this lawsuit: 1. Attachment #1: Demetria Kalodimos, Woman says she paid off gangs to keep son safe in prison, WSMV (Oct. 5, 2017), https://www.wsmv.com/news/woman- says-she-paid-off-gangs-to-keep-son-safe-in-prison/article_a4e670ea-78be-5087-86e5- a65ecd485475.html; 2. Attachment #2: Joseph Wenzel, Over 1,200 staff, inmates test positive for COVID-19 at Trousdale Turner Correctional Center, WSMV (May 1, 2020), https://www.wsmv.com/news/over-1-200-staff-inmates-test-positive-for-covid-19-at- trousdale-turner-correctional-center/article_568c03d2-8bde-11ea-a447- 4b7eaabeb67b.html; -1- Case 3:20-cv-01105 Document 15 Filed 02/01/21 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 568 3. Attachment #3: Adam Tamburin, Tennessee prison inmate dies after fight at Trousdale Turner, THE TENNESSEAN (Jan. 26, 2020), https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2020/01/26/tennessee-prison-inmate-dies- after-fight-trousdale-turner-correctional-center/4581013002/; 4. Attachment #4: Dave Boucher, New Tennessee CCA prison stops taking inmates amid 'serious issues,' THE TENNESSEAN (May 24, 2016), https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2016/05/24/new-tennessee-private- prison-stops-taking-inmates/84867834/; 5.
  • Advisory Councils 2018.Xlsx

    Advisory Councils 2018.Xlsx

    ADDED ON Last Update: 1/10/2018 State/Country Ad Council/Organization Location Program MOU Alabama Aliceville Federal Correctional Facility Aliceville, Alabama Kairos Women Inside Bibb Correctional Facility Brent, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Added 8.11.15 Decatur Work Release Center Decatur; Alabama Kairos Men Inside Donaldson Correctional Facility (Max/Death Row) Bessemer, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Draper Correctional Facility Elmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Elmore Correctional Facility Elmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside GK Fountain Correctional Facility Atmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Hamilton Aged & Infirmed Hamilton, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Holman (Death Row) Correctional Facility Atmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Limestone Correctional Facility Harvest, Alabama Kairos Men Inside St. Clair Correctional Facility Springville, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Staton Correctional Facility Elmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Talladega Federal Talladega, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Tutwiler Prison for Women Wetumpka, Alabama Kairos Women Inside Was KO Alabama 1.30.17 Kairos Outside North Alabama Calera, Alabama Kairos Outside Added 11.7.16 Kairos Outside South Alabama Southern Alabama Kairos Outside Alaska Hiland Mountain Correction Center (HMCC) Eagle River, Alaska KairosWomen Inside Wildwood Correction Center (WCC) Kenai, Alaska Kairos Men Inside Arizona La Palma Correctional Center Eloy, Arizona Kairos Men Inside Added 9.18.17 Wilmot State Prison Tucson, Arizona Kairos Men Inside Added 5.21.16 Arizona State Prison - Perryville (Lumley Unit)
  • Facility Programs Table of Contents

    Facility Programs Table of Contents

    Facility Programs Table of Contents Subject Page Program Descriptions……………………………….………..….....…6-8 North Region Facilities…………………………………………..…..9-14 Southeast Region Facilities……………………………………..…15-19 Southwest Region Facilities……………………………….….…...20-25 2 Locations North Region Facilities Page (Lee) Arrendale State Prison……………………………..……………….….…….8 Augusta State Medical Prison………………………………………..…….………8 Baldwin State Prison…………………………………………………..…..………..9 Burruss Correctional Training Center…………………………………..…..……..9 Central State Prison……………………………………………………….…........10 Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison……………………………..…….10 Hancock State Prison……………………………………………………......…….11 (Forest) Hayes State Prison………………………………………………..……..11 Helms (Medical) Facility…………………………………………………..……….12 (Clyde N.) Phillips State Prison…………………………………………..…….…12 Walker State Prison……………………………………………………….........…13 Washington State Prison………………………………………..………..............13 Whitworth Women’s Facility……………………………………………..………..14 3 Locations Southeast Region Facilities Page Coastal State Prison……………………………………………………………....15 Emanuel Women’s Facility………………………………………………….........15 Georgia State Prison……………………………………………………………...16 Johnson State Prison……………………………………………………………..16 Montgomery State Prison………………………………………………………...17 (Richard H.) Rogers State Prison………………………………………………..17 (Donald H.) Smith State Prison…………………………………….…………….18 Telfair State Prison………………………………………………….……………..18 Ware State Prison………………………………………………….……………...19 4 Locations Southwest Region Facilities Page (Jimmy)
  • Tennessee State Library and Archives Department of Economic And

    Tennessee State Library and Archives Department of Economic And

    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives Department of Economic and Community Development Entertainment Commission Records, 1976-2014 RG 411 COLLECTION SUMMARY Creator: Tennessee. Film, Entertainment and Music Commission Inclusive Dates: 1976-2014 Scope & Content: Consists of Department of Economic and Community Development Entertainment Commission records from 1976-2014. Series I consists of correspondence, schedules, screenplays and other project materials related to the activities of the Tennessee Entertainment Commission. Series II consists of audiovisual material. Series III consists of photographic material. The audiovisual and photographic material in this collection (Boxes 21-42) resides in a climate- controlled vault (X-B-1v to X-C-1v). Access requires a 24-hour notice to allow items to acclimate before use. Series IV consists of electronic records. Physical Description/Extent: 35.5 cubic feet + 73 megabytes Accession/Record Group Number: RG 411 Language: English 1 Permanent Location: RG 411 Repository: Tennessee State Library and Archives, 403 Seventh Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee, 37243-0312 Administrative/Biographical History The General Assembly established the Tennessee Entertainment Commission in 1979. The Commission works to attract film, television, music, and other entertainment producers to the state, while assisting the current entertainment industry cluster within Tennessee. The Commission is under the Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development. (From Tennessee Blue Book 1987-1988 and 2017-2018) Organization/Arrangement of Materials Series List for Physical Records I. Project Files II. Audiovisual Materials III. Photographic Materials IV. Electronic Records Conditions of Access and Use Restrictions on Access: The audio material in this collection resides in a climate-controlled vault.
  • Odyssey: a Prison Magazines Difficultjourlney

    Odyssey: a Prison Magazines Difficultjourlney

    A PROJECT OF THE AMERICAN CIVil LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, INC. VOL 8, NO.1, WINTER 1993 • ISSN9748-2655 \ Odyssey: APrison Magazines DifficultJourlney shape their content by viewing everything lasting impact on the interpretation of in the context of security. In short, they prisoners' First Amendment rights was exercise censorship. brought in July of 1988 by Dannie Martin merica has a long tradition of prison To make matters worse, the Supreme and the San Francisco Chronicle. Martin, journalism. For more than a century, Court and the lower federal courts have a prisoner at the U.S. penitentiary in Aprisoners have established journals consistently weakened prisoners' First Lompoc, California at the time, had written to communicate their interests within the Amendment rights during the past 10 more than 40 articles under his byline prisons and to carry their voices into the years. In Turner v. Safley! for example, during a two-year period for the San community. Despite the hundreds of jour- the Court established that "...censored Francisco Chronicle, openly and without material must objection by Federal Bureau of Prisons offi­ bear a reason­ cials. When he wrote an article describing able relationship rising tensions in Lompoc and criticizing to security." the policies of the new warden, he was • Although the placed in solitary confinement and hastily court did affirm transferred to a federal prison in Phoenix. that prisoners Martin was charged with violating prison have First regulations because he had "acted as a Amendment reporter and published under a byline" and rights, the practi­ because he had "conducted a business." cal effect of the In an opinion delivered by federal dis­ ruling was to trict court judge Charles A.
  • The Politics of Prison Crowding

    The Politics of Prison Crowding

    The Politics of Prison Crowding Jeff Bleich t The dramaticgrowth in interestover prison crowding is typically regarded as simply a product of the rapid increase in prison populations and corre- sponding space shortages. Upon examination, however, it appears that many of the complaints being directed at prisons do not relate directly to increased population densities. This Comment argues that other factors have fueled the crowding debate as well. The Author suggests that the intensity of the prison crowding debate is due in part to changes in the definition of crowding, and he attempts to identify the forces responsible for this changingdefinition. He concludes that although allparticipants in prisonpolicy have an interestin relieving crowded conditions, they also rely on the underlying perception of crowding in order to accomplish their institutionalgoals. This analysissuggests severalpolicy implications. Most importantly, even as prisonpopulations fall, the perception ofprison crowd- ing may remain or become exaggerated. In addition, because the debate now focuses on crowding, the term may be used to include or mask other serious defects in the prison system. Prison managers may be misdiagnos- ing-or intentionally misstating-the sources of current prison problems because of the ease of attributingdifficulties to crowding. Accordingly, the Comment concludes, many of the programs being funded by the legisla- tures to combat crowding may be unsuccessful because they are ill-suited to the underlying problems. INTRODUCTION There may be limits [to prison capacity], but they're not like a brick wall.... [They're] more like the elastic in underwear: They just make it slightly more uncomfortable with each expansion.
  • University Microfilms

    University Microfilms

    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page{s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. Y ou will find a good image o f the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections w ith a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.