DOCSLIB.ORG

Correctional Administrators' Source Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Correctional Administrators' Source Book If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. 41 • CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATORS' SOURCE BOOK Summary of National and Four Regional Training Institutes for Correctional Administrators Made possible by a grant from the Office of Law Enforcement and Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice • Sponsored by AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION ' Woodridge, Station P.O. Box 10176 - Washington, D.C. 20018 301-864-1070 •- • 1966 • TABLE OF CONTENTS - 0- Page PREFACE 1 INTRODUCTION 5 NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ADMINISTRATORS SECTION I Welcoming Address 14 Keynote Address 17 Opening Session :23 Defining the Objectives of a Modern 28 Correctional Program New Resources for Modern Correctional Systems 35 New Concepts of Treatment . 40 • Research, Demonstration & Pilot Projects 46 Preliminary Findings — Ford Foundation 52 Law Enforcement Assistance Act 56 Summary by Honorable Nicholas dee. Katzenbach 59 Measuring the Effectiveness of Correctional 61 Programs • Role of Management in Introducing Change 68 • Legal Implications of Prisoners' Rights 74 Evaluation Panel Report 87 Future Plans for Training Institutes 91 Summary Report 94 REGIONAL INSTITUTES FOR WARDENS AND SUPERINTENDENTS SECTION II OPENING SESSION Western Region 103 Northeastern Region 106 Southern Region — Keynote Speech •110 Central Region 115 • a TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION III • DEFINING THE OBJECTIVES OF A MODERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AND THE ROLE OF THE WARDEN OR SUPER— INTENDENT Western Region 123 Northeastern Region 126 Southern Region 131 Central Region 137 SECTION IV NEW RESOURCES FOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS • Western Region 145 Northeastern Region 156 Southern Region 161 Central Region 164 SECTION V. NEW CONCEPTS OF TREATMENT IN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS Western Region 168 Northeastern Region 173 0 Southern Region 177 Central Region 185 SECTION VI ROLE AND CONTRIBUTION OF RESEARCH FOR CORRECTIONAL • INSTITUTIONS Western Region 191 Northeastern Region 194 Southern Region 197 Central Region 202 • SECTION VII PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE ADMINSTRATION OF JUSTICE • Summary of Sessions at all Institutes 206 • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page • SECTION VIII • THE ROLE OF THE WARDEN OR SUPERINTENDENT IN INSTITUTING CHANGE S Western Region 213 Northeastern Region 216 Southern Region 220 Central Region 227 SECTION IX • IMPLICATIONS OF RECENT JUDICIAL DECISIONS RELATIVE TO PRISONERS' RIGHTS Western Region 233 Southern Region 237 Central Region 249 SECTION X ADVANTAGES OF A PROGRESSIVE CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM • Northeastern Region' 254 SECTION XI EVALUATION OF THE INSTITUTES Western Region 258 Northeastern Region 261 Southern Region 264 Central Region 267 • - C - • APPENDIX I Page NATIONAL INSTITUTE • Program A -2 Participants A-11 Recorders A.14 Attendees A-15 Observers A-17 • WESTERN REGIONAL INSTITUTE Program A-18 Participants A-23 Attendees A-25 Observers A-27 Recorders A-27 NORTHEASTERN REGIONAL INSTITUTE Program A-28 Participants A-34 Attendees A-36 Observers A-38 Recorders A-38 SOUTHERN REGIONAL INSTITUTE Program A-39 Participants A-44 Attendees - A-46 Observers A-48 Recorders A-48 CENTRAL REGIONAL INSTITUTE Program A-49 Participants A-54 Attendees A-56 Recorders A-59 • • APPENDIX II • Page STUDY OF CURRENT ORGANIZATIONS AND PROGRAMS 6-1 IN THE FIELD OF CORRECTIONS • • • • SOURCE BOOK FOR CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATORS VOLUME ONE • 1966 National & Regional Institutes for Correctional Administrators PREFACE A major difference between a field that is an art and one that is a science may be found in the degree to which informa- tion, techniques, data and knowledge are mutually exchanged, developed and shared. There are "secrets" to an art which are • jealously guarded by those who possess them in order to avoid the possibility of a competitor obtaining the private informa- tion or know-how. Only when, in any given field, the practi- tioners shared knowledge, and systemized not only the knowledge but also the sharing process, did that field become a science. The field of corrections, so long an art, has embarked upon a C. process of metamorphosis in which it is changing into a science as well as an art. A manifestation of this change, and a stimulus for further change, was the convocation of a national and a se- ries of regional institutes for correctional administrators. It is the purpose of this Source Book for Correctional Administra- tors to compile, set forth, and share the content of these insti- tutions. This Source Book is an attempt to partially fulfill the requirement for a systematized process of data dissemination, and for the sharing of the best available knowledge and thinking. We call this "Volume One" as an expression more of hope than of fact. We cannot now guarantee that there will be sub- sequent volumes which would cover additional and adjunctive topics and concerns. The compilation of future volumes depends upon the availability of funds and, presently, no such funding exists. There was a time when there were no real grounds for hoping that institutes on a national and regional level could be convened, as they were in 1966. Indeed, years of hopes and • dreams preceded the event. This is equally true of this Source Book which reports on the content of these institutes. But, having accomplished this once, there are now sounder grounds for hoping for more and better. A precedent has.been set which puts a new face on the future. • The institutes, themselves, and this Source Book, were made possible by a grant of funds by the Law Enforcement Assist- ance Office of the United States Department of Justice to the • • Research Council of the American Correctional Association. The National Institute was planned jointly with the Correctional Administrators' Association, while the Regional Institutes were cooperation with the Wardens' Association of planned in America. • Eloth of these professional associations are affiliates of the American Correctional Association. The National Institute for Administrators of State Correctional Systems was held February 19-23, 1966, at the University of Maryland. There were four separate Regional Institutes for Wardens and Superintendents of Correctional Institutions: The Western Regional Institute, 0 May 4-7, 1966, held at Enumclaw, Washington (University of Wash- ington); the Northeastern Regional Institute, May 31-June 4, 1966, held at Pennsylvania State University; the Southern Region- al Institute, July 17-21, 1966 held at the University of Georgia; and, the Central Regional Institute, October 3-7, 1966, held at Carbondale, Illinois (Southern Illinois University). The admin- • istrators and faculty of these five universities are due special appreciation and recognition for their aid, services, and good- will support that contributed so greatly to the success of the institutes, and presenting yet another demonstration of the growing relationships between the correctional field and the academies of higher learning. The organizational style of this volume was designed to convey to the readers a picture of the national scope attendant to the topics that were the back-bones of these institutes. We could have chosen to organize this material by institute, pre- senting the material of each institute apart from the material • of the other institutes. We rejected that form of presentation in favor of organizing the material according to topics. Inas- much as the topics were the same in each of the four regional institutes, this gives the reader the chance to compare and contrast the expressions of each of these regions on a topic by topic basis, a far more specific method of comparison than one • which is based upon the entire content of each regional institute. The National Institute for Administrators of State Correctional Systems is presented as a separate unit and entity primarily because the national picture cannot and should not be confused with the regional. The National Institute was the keystone on which the regional institutes were based. In the material that • follows, the National Institute is presented first, and the regional material is then presented topic by topic. Under each topic will be found what each region had expressed, and these regional expressions are given in the same chronological order in which the regional institutes took place: Western, North- eastern, Southern, Central. • - 2 - • • It is not possible to list the names of all those who made these institutes and this books reality. Quite literally, there were hundreds of persons who contributed in one manner or another, and the contribution of each is highly valued and es- • teemed. The names of the participants in these institutes, as well as the names of the recorders, may be found in the section of this book which immediately follows the title page. The names of those who attended these institutes are listed in the appendix. The contents of this source book concern themselves only with the materiel that was formally presented at the various sessions. What is not included in this book are the several hundreds of informal discussions and interchanges of ideas that took place in hallways, corridors, meal times, leisure hours and, subsequently, in the exchange of mail. The pooling of in- formation and ideas, both formally and informally, is not a cu- mulative process in which the ideas of 50 people are merely added one to the other. In an atmosphere that is supercharged by ideas that carom off of each other, there is created a stim- ulus which produces ideas that would otherwise not have been born. Through the impact of idea upon idea, an interaction occurs which can bring the thinking of individuals and of groups to heights that only the rarest of persons working alone could achieve, and then only infrequently. It was this atmosphere which pervaded these institutions and, even weeks and months later, letters and phone calls are being received and exchanged which indicate that ideas end actions still flow from the stim. ulus of these institutes. As a further aid to this interaction, several steps were taken in the manner in which the sessions were structured and organized. One.of these steps was to hold each workshop in a separate self-contained facility unto itself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LETHAL INJECTION: the Medical Technology of Execution
    LETHAL INJECTION: The medical technology of execution Introduction From hanging to electric chair to lethal injection: how much prettier can you make it? Yet the prettier it becomes, the uglier it is.1 In 1997, China became the first country outside the USA to carry out a judicial execution by lethal injection. Three other countriesGuatemala, Philippines and Taiwancurrently provide for execution by lethal injection but have not yet executed anyone by that method2. The introduction of lethal injection in the USA in 1977 provoked a debate in the medical profession and strong opposition to a medical role in such executions. To 30 September 1997, 268 individuals have been executed by lethal injection in the USA since the first such execution in December 1982 (see appendix 2). Reports of lethal injection executions in China, where the method was introduced in 1997, are sketchy but early indications are that there is a potential for massive use of this form of execution. In 1996, Amnesty International recorded more than 4,300 executions by shooting in China. At least 24 lethal injection executions were reported in the Chinese press in 1997 and this can be presumed to be a minimum (and growing) figure since executions are not automatically reported in the Chinese media. Lethal injection executions depend on medical drugs and procedures and the potential of this kind of execution to involve medical professionals in unethical behaviour, including direct involvement in killing, is clear. Because of this, there has been a long-standing campaign by some individual health professionals and some professional bodies to prohibit medical participation in lethal injection executions.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Penalty Prison Cells
    Death Penalty Prison Cells Which Benton plagiarise so contrapuntally that Rodrique velarized her self-abandonment? Inflamed and razed finedHaven when heel brandersalmost unbrokenly, some sheets though very Gerritwilfully unbinding and motherly? his spoon incarnate. Is Aylmer always historical and The death row made for prison cells even understand that my mother Deposited by friendsfamily andor money earned by working until the prison. A superior Before Dying Solitary Confinement on these Row. Death row Definition of Death tax at Dictionarycom. Lifers would no longer sent a cell which take their space in and already crowded jail. Willie Francis Wikipedia. The strict penalty Emotion numbers and turnover law divide The. The Management of Death-Sentenced Inmates Missouri. Wyoming Frontier Prison Rawlins Picture include row a Check out Tripadvisor members' 113 candid photos and videos of Wyoming Frontier Prison. Walking death camp at San Quentin State Prison KALW. Death row prisoners live in the barren cells Open bars. Living conditions on death during World Coalition Against the. The 156 death row inmates in Pennsylvania state prisons go just sleep every bullet the same note they wake up in an by-12 local cell illuminated. The one woman under a death midwife is incarcerated at an Atlanta prison manual any loose-row cell i look through bars at any chain-link came about 12 feet. In GHANA prison Services officials reported that cold one coil in Ghana 104 death row prisoners were held provide a cell designed to defend only 24 prisoners9 2 Death. Be found few single cells at the Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore Escambia County.
    [Show full text]
  • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
    California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Institution abbreviation, City, State and zip code. Prison Name Abbreviation City State Zip Avenal State Prison ASP Avenal CA 93204 California City Correctional Center CAC California City CA 93505 California State Prison, Calipatria CAL Calipatria CA 92233 California Correctional Center CCC Susanville CA 96130 California Correctional Institution CCI Tehachapi CA 93561 Centinela State Prison CEN Imperial CA 92251 Central California Women’s Facility CCWF Chowchilla CA 93610 California Health Care Facility CHCF Stockton CA 95215 California Institution for Men CIM Chino CA 91710 California Institution for Women CIW Corona CA 92878 California Men's Colony CMC San Luis Obispo CA 93409 California Medical Facility CMF Vacaville CA 95696 California State Prison, Corcoran COR Corcoran CA 93212 California Rehabilitation Center CRC Norco CA 92860 Correctional Training Facility CTF Soledad CA 93960 Chuckawalla Valley State Prison CVSP Blythe CA 92225 Deuel Vocational Institute DVI Tracy CA 95376 Folsom State Prison FSP Represa CA 95671 High Desert State Prison HDSP Susanville CA 96127 Ironwood State Prison ISP Blythe CA 92225 Kern Valley State Prison KVSP Delano CA 93216 California State Prison, Lancaster LAC Lancaster CA 93536 Mule Creek State Prison MCSP Ione CA 95640 North Kern State Prison NKSP Delano CA 93215 Pelican Bay State Prison PBSP Crescent City CA 95531 Pleasant Valley State Prison PVSP Coalinga CA 93210 RJ Donovan Correctional Facility RJD San Diego CA 92179 California State Prison, Sacramento SAC Represa CA 95671 Substance Abuse Treatment Facility SATF Corcoran CA 93212 Sierra Conservation Center SCC Jamestown CA 95327 California State Prison, Solano SOL Vacaville CA 95696 San Quentin SQ San Quentin CA 94964 Salinas Valley State Prison SVSP Soledad CA 93960 Valley State Prison VSP Chowchilla CA 93610 Wasco State Prison WSP Wasco CA 93280 N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • State of California California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Adult Programs
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ADULT PROGRAMS Annual Report Division of Addiction and Recovery Services June 2009 MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Division of Addiction and Recovery Services (DARS) is to provide evidence-based substance use disorder treatment services to California’s inmates and parolees. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ADULT PROGRAMS DIVISION OF ADDICTION AND RECOVERY SERVICES MATTHEW L. CATE SECRETARY KATHRYN P. JETT UNDERSECRETARY, ADULT PROGRAMS C. ELIZABETH SIGGINS CHIEF DEPUTY SECRETARY (Acting), ADULT PROGRAMS THOMAS F. POWERS DIRECTOR DIVISION OF ADDICTION AND RECOVERY SERVICES SHERRI L. GAUGER DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIVISION OF ADDICTION AND RECOVERY SERVICES ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This report was prepared by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations’ (CDCR) Division of Addiction and Recovery Services’ (DARS) Data Analysis and Evaluation Unit (DAEU) with assistance from Steven Chapman, Ph.D., Assistant Secretary, Office of Research. It provides an initial summary of performance indicators, demographics and background information on the DARS Substance Abuse Treatment Programs. The information presented in this report is designed to assist the treatment programs and institutional staff in assessing progress, identifying barriers and weaknesses to effective programming, and analyzing trends, while establishing baseline points to measure outcomes. Under the direction of Bill Whitney, Staff Services Manager II; Gerald Martin, Staff Services Manager I; Sheeva Sabati, Research Analyst II; Ruben Mejia, Research Program Specialist; Krista Christian, Research Program Specialist, conducted extensive research and analysis for this report. Peggy Bengs, Information Officer II and Norma Pate, Special Assistant to the Deputy Director, DARS provided editorial contributions. NOTE: In 2007, DARS designed the Offender Substance Abuse Treatment Database to monitor and evaluate programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders
    Introductory Handbook on The Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders CRIMINAL JUSTICE HANDBOOK SERIES Cover photo: © Rafael Olivares, Dirección General de Centros Penales de El Salvador. UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders CRIMINAL JUSTICE HANDBOOK SERIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2018 © United Nations, December 2018. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Preface The first version of the Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders, published in 2012, was prepared for the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) by Vivienne Chin, Associate of the International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, Canada, and Yvon Dandurand, crimi- nologist at the University of the Fraser Valley, Canada. The initial draft of the first version of the Handbook was reviewed and discussed during an expert group meeting held in Vienna on 16 and 17 November 2011.Valuable suggestions and contributions were made by the following experts at that meeting: Charles Robert Allen, Ibrahim Hasan Almarooqi, Sultan Mohamed Alniyadi, Tomris Atabay, Karin Bruckmüller, Elias Carranza, Elinor Wanyama Chemonges, Kimmett Edgar, Aida Escobar, Angela Evans, José Filho, Isabel Hight, Andrea King-Wessels, Rita Susana Maxera, Marina Menezes, Hugo Morales, Omar Nashabe, Michael Platzer, Roberto Santana, Guy Schmit, Victoria Sergeyeva, Zhang Xiaohua and Zhao Linna.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Prison Reform, 1880-1920
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by IUPUIScholarWorks BARRED PROGRESS: INDIANA PRISON REFORM, 1880-1920 Perry R. Clark Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History Indiana University May 2008 Accepted by the Faculty of Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. ______________________________ Robert G. Barrows, Ph.D., Chair ______________________________ Annie Gilbert Coleman, Ph.D. Master’s Thesis Committee ______________________________ Jason M. Kelly, Ph.D. ii Acknowledgments Although my name appears alone on the cover page of this thesis, the final product could not have been achieved without the guidance and assistance of the numerous people involved in the research and writing process. My professors at IUPUI have been the most warm, patient, and student-oriented group of academics I have ever come across. Robert Barrows, my professor and thesis committee chairman, provided countless hours of advice and took patience to an entirely new level as deadlines consistently needed extending. He is a remarkable teacher, inspiring mentor, and just an overall great man. Annie Gilbert Coleman and Jason Kelly, the other two-thirds of my thesis committee, used their creativity and expertise to expand my understanding of history and, in the end, make me love my trade even more. The rest of my professors, colleagues, and friends in the history department at IUPUI have helped more than they will ever realize. I thank John Taylor, Owen York, Maureen Craney, and Nancy Robertson for their conversation and their ability to make the fifth floor of Cavanaugh Hall both more entertaining and more educational.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth-In-Sentencing Incentive Formula Grant Program
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Assistance REPORT TO CONGRESS Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth-In-Sentencing Incentive Formula Grant Program February 2012 Submitted by: Table of Contents Introduction 1 Funding History 1 Eligibility Requirements 2 Appendixes A. Fiscal Years 1996–2001 VOI/TIS Funding 4 B. VOI/TIS Program Activities by State 6 Introduction Title II, Subtitle A of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (“Crime Act”) (Pub. L. 103-322), established the Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth-in-Sentencing (VOI/TIS) Incentive Grant Program. The program assisted states in their efforts to remove violent offenders from the community and encouraged states to implement TIS laws. Originally administered by the Office of Justice Programs’ (OJP) Corrections Program Office (CPO), the program was transferred to OJP’s Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) in November 2002 after an OJP-wide reorganization merged CPO with BJA. The VOI/TIS Program provided formula grants to states to build or expand correctional facilities and jails to increase secure confinement space for violent offenders. From fiscal years (FYs) 1996 to 2001, half of the funds were made available for VOI grants and half were available as incentive awards to states that implemented TIS laws. VOI/TIS grant funds allowed states to build or expand correctional facilities to increase bed capacity for the confinement of persons convicted of Part 1 violent crimes or adjudicated delinquents who had committed equivalent acts. Funds were also used to build or expand temporary or permanent correctional facilities, including facilities on military bases, prison barges, and boot camps; to confine convicted nonviolent offenders and criminal aliens; or to free suitable existing prison space for the confinement of persons convicted of Part 1 violent crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Programs Serving Families of Adult Offenders National Institute of Corrections
    U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections 11/03 Directory of Programs Serving Families of Adult Offenders National Institute of Corrections Morris L. Thigpen, Director George M. Keiser, Chief Community Corrections Division Kenneth S. Carpenter, Project Manager Directory of Programs Serving Families of Adult Offenders James W. Mustin Editor Stephanie Halfacre Associate Editor August 1998 This project was supported by the National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. ii Introduction This directory was prepared by the Family and Corrections Network to update the Directory of Programs Serving Families of Adult Offenders dated October 1995. This revised directory lists programs in the United States and Canada offering services specifically for families of adult offenders. Entries were identified by sending survey forms to directors of departments of corrections in the United States and Canada, to programs listed in the 1995 directory, and to other programs known to the Family and Corrections Network. Questions about this Directory should be addressed to Jim Mustin, 32 Oak Grove Road, Palmyra, VA 22963. Reproduction and distribution of this document are permitted and encouraged. The document can be downloaded from the Internet at the NIC Information Center website—www.nicic.org. For a single printed copy of the document, contact the NIC Information Center at 800-877-1461 or via the Internet at [email protected]. iii Contents Programs in the United States Alabama ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • April 6, 2017
    Celebrating 125 years as Davis County’s news source SheTech event prepares students The for the future Davis Clipper ON A4 VOL. 125 NO. 36 THURSDAY, APRIL 6, 2017 THE BOUNTIFUL CITY COUNCIL recently approved a six-month moratorium on new development in the community’s historic district. The moratorium is in response to resident concerns that the historic character of the neighborhoods be preserved if new businesses or multi-family housing projects are proposed for Thrive the area. Photos by Tom Haraldsen | Davis Clipper Explore more about vision with the latest word on cataracts, Moratorium for Bountiful historic area stem therapy for eye disease, and more. By TOM HARALDSEN “It’s a three-prong approach,” height, setbacks, parking and [email protected] he said. “We’ll first talk to those in other standards. THRIVE, B1 the neighborhoods and find out There have also been calls for their concerns. Then we’ll take preserving existing homes and BOUNTIFUL—After hearing concerns voiced by that information to the planning possibly changing the zoning commission, who can make in the area from multi-family some residents and business owners in a section of recommendations. Once we have residential to single-family. the community near historic downtown, Bountiful’s something ready to present to Councilmember Kendalyn the council, we’ll bring a proposal Harris stated the six-month time City Council approved adoption of a six-month mora- back before you for adoption. The frame could be punitive for anyone torium on new development in that area. key thing is making sure that we hoping to start new developments can maintain the identity of this this year, as it would push the The section in question is between 400 North and area and that development going approval date of any proposed 500 South, from 400 East to 200 West.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Move, March 2019
    March 2019 On The Move TDCJ Employee Promotions and Transfers Name From To Assistant Warden, Assistant Warden, Henry Adams Beauford H. Jester IV Psychiatric Unit Larry Gist State Jail Major of Correctional Officers, Major of Correctional Officers, Ricky Allen Mark W. Michael Unit Joe F. Gurney Transfer Facility Assistant Warden, Senior Warden, Damon Andrews William P. Clements Unit Joe Kegans State Jail Major of Correctional Officers, Major of Correctional Officers, Terry Andrews Glen Ray Goodman Transfer Facility Eastham Unit Senior Warden, Senior Warden, Richard Babcock Joe Kegans State Jail Beauford H. Jester IV Psychiatric Unit Major of Correctional Officers, Assistant Warden, James Blake Charles T. Terrell Unit Jim Ferguson Unit Senior Warden, Senior Warden, Rodger Bowers Manuel A. Segovia Unit/ Pam Lychner State Jail Reynaldo V. Lopez State Jail Senior Warden, Senior Warden, Stephen Bryant Pam Lychner State Jail Darrington Unit Senior Warden, Senior Warden, Michael Butcher Darrington Unit Allan B. Polunsky Unit Major of Correctional Officers, Assistant Warden, Joe Castillo John B. Connally Unit Price Daniel Unit Senior Warden, Senior Warden, Evelyn Castro Dolph Briscoe Unit/ Clarence N. Stevenson Unit Cotulla Transfer Facility Major of Correctional Officers, Assistant Warden, Nick Clayton Thomas Havins Unit Alfred D. Hughes Unit Senior Warden, Senior Warden, Mary Ann Comstock-King Charles T. Terrell Unit Mountain View/Hilltop Units Senior Warden, Senior Warden, Dennis Crowley Offender Transportation Reverend C.A. Holliday Transfer Facility Major of Correctional Officers, Assistant Warden, Kendrick Demyers A.M. “Mac” Stringfellow Unit Carol S. Vance Unit Senior Warden, Senior Warden, Daniel Dickerson Reverend C.A. Holliday Transfer Facility W.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Department of Corrections: 30 Years of Progress
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ____~____ ~:-:'----;-- - ~-- ----;--;:-'l~. - Texas Department of Corrections: 30 Years of Progress ,. In 1967, the Department published a report, Texas Department of Corrections: 20 Years of Progress. That report was largely the work of Mr. Richard C. Jones, former Assistant Director for Treatment. The report that follows borrowed hea-vily and in many cases directly from Mr. Jones' efforts. This is but another example of how we continue to profit from, and, hopefully, build upon the excellent wC';-h of those preceding us. Texas Department of Corrections: 30 Years of Progress NCJRS dAN 061978 ACQUISIT10i~:.j OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DOLPH BRISCOE STATE CAPITOL GOVERNOR AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 My Fellow Texans: All Texans owe a debt of gratitude to the Honorable H. H. Coffield. former Chairman of the Texas Board of Corrections, who recently retired after many years of dedicated service on the Board; to the present members of the Board; to Mr. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director of the Texas Department of Corrections; and to the many people who work with him in the management of the Department. Continuing progress has been the benchmark of the Texas Department of Corrections over the past thirty years. Proposed reforms have come to fruition through the careful and diligent management p~ovided by successive administ~ations. The indust~ial and educational p~ograms that have been initiated have resulted in a substantial tax savings for the citizens of this state and one of the lowest recidivism rates in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2012 a Publication of the CPO Foundation Vol
    CPO FAMILY Spring 2012 A Publication of The CPO Foundation Vol. 22, No. 1 The Correctional Peace Officers Foundation CPO Family The Correctional Peace Officers’ Foundation was founded in the early 1980s at Folsom State Prison in California. If this is the first time you are reading one of our semi-annual publications, the magazine, welcome! And to all those that became Supporting Members in the middle to late 1980s and all the years that have followed, THANKS for making the Correctional Peace Officers’ (CPO) Foundation the organization it is today. The CPO Foundationbe there immediatelywas created with two goals Correctional Officer Buddy Herron in mind: first, to Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution in the event of EOW: November 29, 2011 a line-of-duty death; and second, to promote a posi- tive image of the Correc- tions profession. Correctional Officer Tracy Hardin We ended 2011 tragi- High Desert State Prison, Nevada cally with the murder of C/O Buddy Herron of East- EOW: January 20, 2012 ern Oregon Correctional Institution in Pendleton, Oregon. Upon hearing of his death I immediately Correctional Corporal Barbara Ester flew to Portland, Oregon, East Arkansas Unit along with Kim Blakley, EOW: January 20, 2012 and met up with Oregon CPOF Field Representative Dan Weber. Through the Internet the death of one of our own spreads quickly. Correctional Sergeant Ruben Thomas III As mentioned in the Com- Columbia Correctional Institution, Florida mander’s article (inside, EOW: March 18, 2012 starting on page 10), Honor Guards from across the na- tion snapped to attention. Corrections Officer Britney Muex Thus, Kim and I were met in Pendleton by hundreds and Lake County Sheriff’s Department, Indiana hundreds of uniform staff.
    [Show full text]