Current Understanding of Meningeal and Cerebral Vascular Function

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Current Understanding of Meningeal and Cerebral Vascular Function Review Article Cephalalgia 0(0) 1–17 ! International Headache Society 2018 Current understanding of meningeal Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav and cerebral vascular function DOI: 10.1177/0333102418771350 underlying migraine headache journals.sagepub.com/home/cep Dan Levy1,2 , Alejandro Labastida-Ramirez3 and Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink3 Abstract Background: The exact mechanisms underlying the onset of a migraine attack are not completely understood. It is, however, now well accepted that the onset of the excruciating throbbing headache of migraine is mediated by the activation and increased mechanosensitivity (i.e. sensitization) of trigeminal nociceptive afferents that innervate the cranial meninges and their related large blood vessels. Objectives: To provide a critical summary of current understanding of the role that the cranial meninges, their associated vasculature, and immune cells play in meningeal nociception and the ensuing migraine headache. Methods: We discuss the anatomy of the cranial meninges, their associated vasculature, innervation and immune cell population. We then debate the meningeal neurogenic inflammation hypothesis of migraine and its putative contribution to migraine pain. Finally, we provide insights into potential sources of meningeal inflammation and nociception beyond neurogenic inflammation, and their potential contribution to migraine headache. Keywords Meninges, afferent, vascular, immune, neurogenic inflammation Date received: 21 November 2017; revised: 6 March 2018; 19 March 2018; accepted: 26 March 2018 Migraine is a complex, multifactorial neurological disor- a thick layer of connective tissue apposing to the cra- der affecting about 10% of the adult population world- nium, and the leptomeninges. The latter can be further wide (1). It is the second most prevalent neurological separated into the arachnoid and pia mater. The dura disorder (1) and the first cause of disability in under mater can be divided anatomically into three layers, the 50s (2,3). While the exact mechanisms underlying the endosteal (periosteal) layer, the inner meningeal layer, onset of a migraine attack remain unclear, it is now and the dural border cell layer, or subdural neurothe- accepted that the development of the excruciating throb- lium (8). The dural layers are fused in most places, but bing headache of migraine requires the initial activation separate to form the venous sinuses and at the Falx and increased mechanosensitivity (i.e. sensitization) of cerebri. The dural border cell layer is attached to the trigeminal nociceptive afferents that innervate the cranial outer layer of the arachnoid – the arachnoid barrier cell meninges and their related large blood vessels (4–7). The goal of this review is to summarize current knowledge and understanding of the role that the cranial meninges 1Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel and their related vasculature and cellular constituents Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA play in the meningeal nociceptive processes underlying 3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and the onset of migraine headache. Pharmacology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (i) Anatomical features of the cranial meninges and their associated vasculature Corresponding author: Dan Levy, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 The cranial meninges are comprised of two main Brookline, DA717, Boston, MA 02215, USA. distinct layers: The dura mater, or pachymeninx, Email: [email protected] 2 Cephalalgia 0(0) layer – by occasional cell junctions, or desmosomes. space, which is filled with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Under various pathological conditions, such as in the The pia mater, the most inner meningeal layer, abuts case of subdural hematoma, damage to the dural a cortical barrier layer made of astrocyte endfoot pro- border cell layer can lead to separation of the dura cesses (i.e. the glia limitans, Figure 1(a)). Blood vessels from the arachnoid and the formation of a ‘‘subdural within the subarachnoid space are coated by a pia space’’ (8). The arachnoid layer connects to the thin pia mater layer (hence the name pial vessels). As arteries mater via collagen trabeculae to form the subarachnoid penetrate the brain, a single-layered sheath of pial cells (a) (b) Dura mater Sympathetic Parasympathetic Trigeminal ? NA PACAP ACh CGRP ATP NPY SP NO VIP PACAP Dura mater Arachnoid ? Fibroblast Subarachnoid Dendritic Mast Macrophage Artery Vein Lymphatic space cell cell (CSF) NA ATP PACAP CGRP PACAP NO NA Prostaglandins NPY ACh CGRP VIP PACAP SP NO CLR/RAMP1 PAC/VPAP-R GC/cGMP abPG IP EP TP ATP 5-HT Histamine ACh NGF BDNF TNF-a IL-1 IL-6 K+ Pia mater NO Glutamate 5-HT-R H-R mACh-R nACh-R NGF-R BDNF-R TNF-R IL-1R IL-6R ATP ET ATP SP NPY VIP Astrocyte P2X TRPM8 TRPV1 TRPA1 ET-R P2Y NK1 NPY-R VIP-R Pyramidal Cerebral cortex neuron Dura mater Subarachnoid space (CSF) Arachnoid Arachnoid trabeculae Pia mater Falx cerebri Figure 1. Overview of the cranial meninges and their associated constituents. (a) Schematic illustration of meningeal innervation components in relation to superficial cortical constituents and their mediators (red and yellow, denoting molecules released from neurons and astrocytes respectively), which upon reaching the subarachnoid space via diffusion or bulk flow, could underlie the cortical to meninges signaling in migraine with aura and perhaps also in migraine without aura. (b) Postulated crosstalk between meningeal autonomic and sensory nerves, resident immune cells, fibroblasts and vessels that have been suggested to contribute to meningeal nociception and headache and receptor systems that have been (i) implicated in the genesis of migraine pain in clinical studies (black font), (ii) suggested to activate and/or sensitize the meningeal sensory system based on preclinical studies (blue font), or with questionable contribution to meningeal nociception and headache pain (red font). CGRP: calcitonin gene-related peptide; PACAP: pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide; NO: nitric oxide; NA: noradrena- line; ACh: acetylcholine; NGF: nerve growth factor; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; TNF-a: tumor necrosis factor; IL-1: interleukin-1; IL-6: interleukin 6; ATP: adenosine triphosphate; SP: substance P; NPY: neuropeptide Y; VIP: vasoactive intestinal peptide; ET: endothelin. Levy et al. 3 is maintained for a short distance and separates to suggest expression of glutamate in meningeal affer- between the vessel wall and the glia limitans (9,10). ents, a recent retrograde tracing study in the mouse Upon entering the cortex, the pial layer that surrounds identified vesicular glutamate transporter 3 in a subpo- the arterioles becomes fenestrated. Penetrating veins pulation of small diameter dural afferents (26). lack a continuous pial layer (9). The dura mater is also innervated by The dura mater is highly vascularized. The arterial autonomic fibers that express PACAP, neuronal nitric supply of the supratentorial dura mater comes primar- oxide synthase (nNOS), vasoactive intestinal polypep- ily from branches of the posterior, middle (the largest), tide (VIP), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), acetylcholine and anterior meningeal arteries, which arise from (ACh), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) (18,21–24,27–31). the occipital, maxillary, and ophthalmic arteries respec- Ultrastructural studies conducted in the rat localized tively. Meningeal arteries lie predominantly in the some peptidergic fibers’ termination in the vicinity, or endosteal layer. The intracranial middle meningeal walls, of dural blood vessels including lymphatics; artery, which enters the cranium through the foramen axon terminations on collagen bundles in the dural spinosum, runs in grooves in the inner table of the connective tissue have been shown to be more abun- calvarium, surrounded almost on three sides by bone dant, however (12,18). Within the leptomeningeal, (11). A dense capillary network occurs in the inner which lack their own blood supply, the cerebral (pial) meningeal layer of the dura. The major dural veins, arteries are the primary sites that receive sensory and which run primarily parallel to the path of the menin- autonomic innervations by fibers that originate from geal arteries, drain into efferent vessels in the periosteal sympathetic, parasympathetic, and sensory trigeminal layer or the dural venous sinuses. The dural venous ganglia (Figure 1(a)). Immunohistochemistry studies sinuses absorb CSF from the subarachnoid space via together with denervation and tracing studies identified arachnoid granulations. Studies in rodents also identi- trigeminal nerves expressing substance P and CGRP, as fied a dural lymphatic vascular network alongside well as autonomic nerves that express NPY, VIP, blood vessels, primarily the middle meningeal artery, nNOS, ACh, and tryptophan-5-hydroxylase (28,32– superior sagittal sinus, and transverse sinuses (12–15). 39). The sensory and autonomic innervation of cerebral A recent study in non-human primates and humans pial vessels is primarily localized to the subarachnoid has shown that the dural lymphatic system drains space and does not follow the vessels when they macromolecules from the dura (15). In rodents, dural penetrate the cortex; the loss of pial sheath in the pene- lymphatics drain CSF and parenchymal interstitial fluid trating
Recommended publications
  • Multiple Osteomas of the Falx Cerebri and Anterior Skull Base: Case Report
    CASE REPORT J Neurosurg 124:1339–1342, 2016 Multiple osteomas of the falx cerebri and anterior skull base: case report Khaled M. Krisht, MD,1 Cheryl A. Palmer, MD,2 and William T. Couldwell, MD, PhD1 1Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, and 2Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah The authors describe a rare case of intracranial extraaxial parafalcine and anterior skull base osteomas in a 22-year- old woman presenting with bifrontal headaches. This case highlights the possible occurrence of such lesions along the anterior skull base and parafalcine region that, as such, should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis for extraaxial calcific lesions involving the anterior skull base. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first reported case of a patient who underwent complete successful resection of multiple extraaxial osteomas of the anterior skull base and parafalcine region. http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2015.6.JNS15865 KEY WORDS osteoma; anterior skull base; parafalcine; falx cerebri; differential; CT; oncology STEOMAS are benign neoplasms consisting of ma- was first evaluated 6 years earlier, undergoing contrast- ture normal osseous tissue. They commonly arise enhancing MRI of the brain that disclosed a nonenhanc- from the long bones of the extremities. In the re- ing extraaxial T1-weighted isointense and T2-weighted Ogion of the head and neck, they are usually limited to the hypointense parafalcine lesion. At her latest presentation paranasal sinuses, facial bones, skull, and mandible.4,5,7 repeat brain MRI with and without contrast enhancement Their etiology is still a matter of debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Distance Learning Program Anatomy of the Human Brain/Sheep Brain Dissection
    Distance Learning Program Anatomy of the Human Brain/Sheep Brain Dissection This guide is for middle and high school students participating in AIMS Anatomy of the Human Brain and Sheep Brain Dissections. Programs will be presented by an AIMS Anatomy Specialist. In this activity students will become more familiar with the anatomical structures of the human brain by observing, studying, and examining human specimens. The primary focus is on the anatomy, function, and pathology. Those students participating in Sheep Brain Dissections will have the opportunity to dissect and compare anatomical structures. At the end of this document, you will find anatomical diagrams, vocabulary review, and pre/post tests for your students. The following topics will be covered: 1. The neurons and supporting cells of the nervous system 2. Organization of the nervous system (the central and peripheral nervous systems) 4. Protective coverings of the brain 5. Brain Anatomy, including cerebral hemispheres, cerebellum and brain stem 6. Spinal Cord Anatomy 7. Cranial and spinal nerves Objectives: The student will be able to: 1. Define the selected terms associated with the human brain and spinal cord; 2. Identify the protective structures of the brain; 3. Identify the four lobes of the brain; 4. Explain the correlation between brain surface area, structure and brain function. 5. Discuss common neurological disorders and treatments. 6. Describe the effects of drug and alcohol on the brain. 7. Correctly label a diagram of the human brain National Science Education
    [Show full text]
  • The Strain Rates in the Brain, Brainstem, Dura, and Skull Under Dynamic Loadings
    Mathematical and Computational Applications Article The Strain Rates in the Brain, Brainstem, Dura, and Skull under Dynamic Loadings Mohammad Hosseini-Farid 1,2,* , MaryamSadat Amiri-Tehrani-Zadeh 3, Mohammadreza Ramzanpour 1, Mariusz Ziejewski 1 and Ghodrat Karami 1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58104, USA; [email protected] (M.R.); [email protected] (M.Z.); [email protected] (G.K.) 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA 3 Department of Computer Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58104, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-7012315859 Received: 7 March 2020; Accepted: 5 April 2020; Published: 7 April 2020 Abstract: Knowing the precise material properties of intracranial head organs is crucial for studying the biomechanics of head injury. It has been shown that these biological tissues are significantly rate-dependent; hence, their material properties should be determined with respect to the range of deformation rate they experience. In this paper, a validated finite element human head model is used to investigate the biomechanics of the head in impact and blast, leading to traumatic brain injuries (TBI). We simulate the head under various directions and velocities of impacts, as well as helmeted and unhelmeted head under blast shock waves. It is demonstrated that the strain rates for the brain 1 are in the range of 36 to 241 s− , approximately 1.9 and 0.86 times the resulting head acceleration under impacts and blast scenarios, respectively. The skull was found to experience a rate in the range 1 of 14 to 182 s− , approximately 0.7 and 0.43 times the head acceleration corresponding to impact and blast cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Prospective Pharmacological Targets in Relation to Antimigraine Action
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Erasmus University Digital Repository Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol (2008) 378:371–394 DOI 10.1007/s00210-008-0322-7 REVIEW Current and prospective pharmacological targets in relation to antimigraine action Suneet Mehrotra & Saurabh Gupta & Kayi Y. Chan & Carlos M. Villalón & David Centurión & Pramod R. Saxena & Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink Received: 8 January 2008 /Accepted: 6 June 2008 /Published online: 15 July 2008 # The Author(s) 2008 Abstract Migraine is a recurrent incapacitating neuro- (CGRP1 and CGRP2), adenosine (A1,A2,andA3), glutamate vascular disorder characterized by unilateral and throbbing (NMDA, AMPA, kainate, and metabotropic), dopamine, headaches associated with photophobia, phonophobia, endothelin, and female hormone (estrogen and progesterone) nausea, and vomiting. Current specific drugs used in the receptors. In addition, we have considered some other acute treatment of migraine interact with vascular receptors, targets, including gamma-aminobutyric acid, angiotensin, a fact that has raised concerns about their cardiovascular bradykinin, histamine, and ionotropic receptors, in relation to safety. In the past, α-adrenoceptor agonists (ergotamine, antimigraine therapy. Finally, the cardiovascular safety of dihydroergotamine, isometheptene) were used. The last two current and prospective antimigraine therapies is touched decades have witnessed the advent of 5-HT1B/1D receptor upon. agonists (sumatriptan and second-generation triptans), which have a well-established efficacy in the acute Keywords 5-HT. Antimigraine drugs . CGRP. treatment of migraine. Moreover, current prophylactic Noradrenaline . Migraine . Receptors treatments of migraine include 5-HT2 receptor antagonists, Ca2+ channel blockers, and β-adrenoceptor antagonists. Despite the progress in migraine research and in view of its Introduction complex etiology, this disease still remains underdiagnosed, and available therapies are underused.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Spinal Cord Basics of Neuroanatomy Brain Meninges
    Review of Spinal Cord with Basics of Neuroanatomy Brain Meninges Prof. D.H. Pauža Parts of Nervous System Review of Spinal Cord with Basics of Neuroanatomy Brain Meninges Prof. D.H. Pauža Neurons and Neuroglia Neuron Human brain contains per 1011-12 (trillions) neurons Body (soma) Perikaryon Nissl substance or Tigroid Dendrites Axon Myelin Terminals Synapses Neuronal types Unipolar, pseudounipolar, bipolar, multipolar Afferent (sensory, centripetal) Efferent (motor, centrifugal, effector) Associate (interneurons) Synapse Presynaptic membrane Postsynaptic membrane, receptors Synaptic cleft Synaptic vesicles, neuromediator Mitochondria In human brain – neurons 1011 (100 trillions) Synapses – 1015 (quadrillions) Neuromediators •Acetylcholine •Noradrenaline •Serotonin •GABA •Endorphin •Encephalin •P substance •Neuronal nitric oxide Adrenergic nerve ending. There are many 50-nm-diameter vesicles (arrow) with dark, electron-dense cores containing norepinephrine. x40,000. Cell Types of Neuroglia Astrocytes - Oligodendrocytes – Ependimocytes - Microglia Astrocytes – a part of hemoencephalic barrier Oligodendrocytes Ependimocytes and microglial cells Microglia represent the endogenous brain defense and immune system, which is responsible for CNS protection against various types of pathogenic factors. After invading the CNS, microglial precursors disseminate relatively homogeneously throughout the neural tissue and acquire a specific phenotype, which clearly distinguish them from their precursors, the blood-derived monocytes. The ´resting´ microglia
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Structure and Function Related to Headache
    Review Cephalalgia 0(0) 1–26 ! International Headache Society 2018 Brain structure and function related Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav to headache: Brainstem structure and DOI: 10.1177/0333102418784698 function in headache journals.sagepub.com/home/cep Marta Vila-Pueyo1 , Jan Hoffmann2 , Marcela Romero-Reyes3 and Simon Akerman3 Abstract Objective: To review and discuss the literature relevant to the role of brainstem structure and function in headache. Background: Primary headache disorders, such as migraine and cluster headache, are considered disorders of the brain. As well as head-related pain, these headache disorders are also associated with other neurological symptoms, such as those related to sensory, homeostatic, autonomic, cognitive and affective processing that can all occur before, during or even after headache has ceased. Many imaging studies demonstrate activation in brainstem areas that appear specifically associated with headache disorders, especially migraine, which may be related to the mechanisms of many of these symptoms. This is further supported by preclinical studies, which demonstrate that modulation of specific brainstem nuclei alters sensory processing relevant to these symptoms, including headache, cranial autonomic responses and homeostatic mechanisms. Review focus: This review will specifically focus on the role of brainstem structures relevant to primary headaches, including medullary, pontine, and midbrain, and describe their functional role and how they relate to mechanisms
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Subarachnoid Trabeculae: a Comprehensive Review of Their Embryology, Histology, Morphology, and Surgical Significance Martin M
    Literature Review Subarachnoid Trabeculae: A Comprehensive Review of Their Embryology, Histology, Morphology, and Surgical Significance Martin M. Mortazavi1,2, Syed A. Quadri1,2, Muhammad A. Khan1,2, Aaron Gustin3, Sajid S. Suriya1,2, Tania Hassanzadeh4, Kian M. Fahimdanesh5, Farzad H. Adl1,2, Salman A. Fard1,2, M. Asif Taqi1,2, Ian Armstrong1,2, Bryn A. Martin1,6, R. Shane Tubbs1,7 Key words - INTRODUCTION: Brain is suspended in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled sub- - Arachnoid matter arachnoid space by subarachnoid trabeculae (SAT), which are collagen- - Liliequist membrane - Microsurgical procedures reinforced columns stretching between the arachnoid and pia maters. Much - Subarachnoid trabeculae neuroanatomic research has been focused on the subarachnoid cisterns and - Subarachnoid trabecular membrane arachnoid matter but reported data on the SAT are limited. This study provides a - Trabecular cisterns comprehensive review of subarachnoid trabeculae, including their embryology, Abbreviations and Acronyms histology, morphologic variations, and surgical significance. CSDH: Chronic subdural hematoma - CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid METHODS: A literature search was conducted with no date restrictions in DBC: Dural border cell PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Wiley Online Library, Cochrane, and Research Gate. DL: Diencephalic leaf Terms for the search included but were not limited to subarachnoid trabeculae, GAG: Glycosaminoglycan subarachnoid trabecular membrane, arachnoid mater, subarachnoid trabeculae LM: Liliequist membrane ML: Mesencephalic leaf embryology, subarachnoid trabeculae histology, and morphology. Articles with a PAC: Pia-arachnoid complex high likelihood of bias, any study published in nonpopular journals (not indexed PPAS: Potential pia-arachnoid space in PubMed or MEDLINE), and studies with conflicting data were excluded. SAH: Subarachnoid hemorrhage SAS: Subarachnoid space - RESULTS: A total of 1113 articles were retrieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinal Meninges Neuroscience Fundamentals > Regional Neuroscience > Regional Neuroscience
    Spinal Meninges Neuroscience Fundamentals > Regional Neuroscience > Regional Neuroscience SPINAL MENINGES GENERAL ANATOMY Meningeal Layers From outside to inside • Dura mater • Arachnoid mater • Pia mater Meningeal spaces From outside to inside • Epidural (above the dura) - See: epidural hematoma and spinal cord compression from epidural abscess • Subdural (below the dura) - See: subdural hematoma • Subarachnoid (below the arachnoid mater) - See: subarachnoid hemorrhage Spinal canal Key Anatomy • Vertebral body (anteriorly) • Vertebral arch (posteriorly). • Vertebral foramen within the vertebral arch. MENINGEAL LAYERS 1 / 4 • Dura mater forms a thick ring within the spinal canal. • The dural root sheath (aka dural root sleeve) is the dural investment that follows nerve roots into the intervertebral foramen. • The arachnoid mater runs underneath the dura (we lose sight of it under the dural root sheath). • The pia mater directly adheres to the spinal cord and nerve roots, and so it takes the shape of those structures. MENINGEAL SPACES • The epidural space forms external to the dura mater, internal to the vertebral foramen. • The subdural space lies between the dura and arachnoid mater layers. • The subarachnoid space lies between the arachnoid and pia mater layers. CRANIAL VS SPINAL MENINGES  Cranial Meninges • Epidural is a potential space, so it's not a typical disease site unless in the setting of high pressure middle meningeal artery rupture or from traumatic defect. • Subdural is a potential space but bridging veins (those that pass from the subarachnoid space into the dural venous sinuses) can tear, so it is a common site of hematoma. • Subarachnoid space is an actual space and is a site of hemorrhage and infection, for example.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Advances in Therapeutic Peptides Targeting G Protein-Coupled
    Advances in therapeutic peptides targeting G protein-coupled receptors Anthony P. Davenport1Ϯ Conor C.G. Scully2Ϯ, Chris de Graaf2, Alastair J. H. Brown2 and Janet J. Maguire1 1Experimental Medicine and Immunotherapeutics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 2Sosei Heptares, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6DG, UK. Ϯ Contributed equally Correspondence to Anthony P. Davenport email: [email protected] Abstract Dysregulation of peptide-activated pathways causes a range of diseases, fostering the discovery and clinical development of peptide drugs. Many endogenous peptides activate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) — nearly fifty GPCR peptide drugs have been approved to date, most of them for metabolic disease or oncology, and more than 10 potentially first- in-class peptide therapeutics are in the pipeline. The majority of existing peptide therapeutics are agonists, which reflects the currently dominant strategy of modifying the endogenous peptide sequence of ligands for peptide-binding GPCRs. Increasingly, novel strategies are being employed to develop both agonists and antagonists, and both to introduce chemical novelty and improve drug-like properties. Pharmacodynamic improvements are evolving to bias ligands to activate specific downstream signalling pathways in order to optimise efficacy and reduce side effects. In pharmacokinetics, modifications that increase plasma-half life have been revolutionary. Here, we discuss the current status of peptide drugs targeting GPCRs, with a focus on evolving strategies to improve pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Introduction G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate a wide range of signalling processes and are targeted by one third of drugs in clinical use1. Although most GPCR-targeting therapeutics are small molecules2, the endogenous ligands for many GPCRs are peptides (comprising 50 or fewer amino acids), which suggests that this class of molecule could be therapeutically useful.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Oral Ubrogepant in Th
    NCT02873221 Study ID: UBR‐MD‐04 Title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open‐Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long‐Term Safety and Tolerability of Oral Ubrogepant in the Acute Treatment of Migraine With or Without Aura Protocol Amd 3 Date: 11‐Apr‐2018 Allergan Confidential Protocol UBR-MD-04 Amendment 3 Title Page ALLERGAN – CONFIDENTIAL The following contains confidential, proprietary information which is the property of Allergan A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL EXTENSION STUDY TO EVALUATE THE LONG-TERM SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF ORAL UBROGEPANT IN THE ACUTE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE WITH OR WITHOUT AURA Protocol Number: UBR-MD-04 Amendment 3 Phase: 3 Name of Investigational Product: Ubrogepant Sponsor: Allergan Pharmaceuticals Authorized US Agent International Limited Allergan Sales, LLC Clonshaugh Industrial Estate 2525 Dupont Drive Coolock Irvine, California USA 92612 Dublin 17 +1-714-246-4500 Ireland +1-800-347-4500 Emergency Telephone Number(s): Refer to the Study Contacts Page Serious Adverse Event Reporting Fax Number: Allergan Medical Safety Physician Please see Study Contact Sheet Contact Information: Allergan Signatory: Original Protocol Date: 02 May 2016 Protocol Amendment 1 Date: 15 Nov 2016 Protocol Amendment 2 Date: 06 Dec 2017 Protocol Amendment 3 Date: 11 Apr 2018 The following information can be found on FDA Form 1572 and/or study contacts page: Name and contact information of Allergan study personnel and Emergency Telephone Numbers; name, address, and statement of qualifications of each investigator; name of each subinvestigator working under the supervision of the investigator; name and address of the research facilities to be used; name and address of each reviewing IRB; US 21 CFR 312.23 section 6(iii)b.
    [Show full text]
  • CGRP Signaling Via CALCRL Increases Chemotherapy Resistance and Stem Cell Properties in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article CGRP Signaling via CALCRL Increases Chemotherapy Resistance and Stem Cell Properties in Acute Myeloid Leukemia 1,2 1,2, 1,2, 1,2 Tobias Gluexam , Alexander M. Grandits y, Angela Schlerka y, Chi Huu Nguyen , Julia Etzler 1,2 , Thomas Finkes 1,2, Michael Fuchs 3, Christoph Scheid 3, Gerwin Heller 1,2 , Hubert Hackl 4 , Nathalie Harrer 5, Heinz Sill 6 , Elisabeth Koller 7 , Dagmar Stoiber 8,9, Wolfgang Sommergruber 10 and Rotraud Wieser 1,2,* 1 Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] (T.G.); [email protected] (A.M.G.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (C.H.N.); [email protected] (J.E.); thomas.fi[email protected] (T.F.); [email protected] (G.H.) 2 Comprehensive Cancer Center, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria 3 Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany; [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (C.S.) 4 Institute of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected] 5 Department for Cancer Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Dr. Boehringer-Gasse 5-11, A-1121 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 6 Division of Hematology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz
    [Show full text]