Integrating the Internet Inside Your Company

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrating the Internet Inside Your Company PART One Integrating the Internet Inside Your Company CHAPTER 1 Cutting Costs across Your Enterprise: How to Run a Tighter, More Competitive Ship Several years back, the first edition of this book began with the question: “Skeptics of the Internet’s influence on businesses often ask the question: ‘How much money have you made on the Internet today?’” The answer was, and still is: For most companies, that’s the wrong question to ask at this time. A trailblazing few—such as Dell Computer, which manages to ring up web sales to the tune of $16 billion a year—have transformed their web operations into profit centers. A better question to ask companies right now would be: How has the Internet made your operation run faster, smarter, and cheaper? Whether you’re a pur- chasing manager in a global enterprise or a two-man start-up in a basement, you will both have certain practices in common. Both companies buy office equipment, utilize communications networks and instruments, travel, employ personnel, and need to further exploit the Net to their respective ends in order to keep a competitive edge. This chapter will help you do this for your own company, as innumerable free or inex- pensive web-based business tools and solutions created over the past few years have changed the way that we conduct business. You’ll learn about the following: II Application Service Providers (ASPs) II Unified messaging II Fax over IP II Internet telephony II B2B exchanges 3 4 Chapter 1 II Customer service savings II Intranets and Extranets II Distributed printing Optimizing Your Purchasing Power In geek-speak, the Internet is known as an open-computing environment. This open- ness has a monumental impact on the marketplace as well. Putting scores of competi- tors within one click of each other makes for a truly open, and often brutal, marketplace. According to Internet research firm Jupiter Communications, the nonser- vice business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce marketplace in the United States will be worth $6.3 trillion, or 42 percent of the market, by 2005—as compared to the 3 percent of nonservice B2B trade conducted online in year 2000. Pretty impressive figures. In addition, about 92 percent of today’s online B2B sales are now direct, or made by one seller to many buyers. Jupiter predicts that 35 percent of online B2B transactions will be made using a net market with many buyers and many sellers or a coalition market with a consortium of buyers and sellers. Jupiter advises companies to incorporate Internet strategies immediately throughout their procure- ment and sales processes. So do we. Let’s begin. Why Buy When You Can Rent? You might recognize this reversal of the real estate adage, Why rent when you can buy? On the Internet, the opposite is true. As more and more web-supported products and services become available, it is increasingly common for businesses to “rent” the right to use a product or service from a particular company, and to manage that function over the Web (or incorporate it into their site). An application service provider (ASP) is a company that offers individuals or enterprises access over the Internet to applications and related services that would otherwise have to be located in their own personal or enterprise computers. The ASP market is exploding, especially for the small to midsized business market. Why should you reinvent the wheel and build an application internally, when you can rent and manage the solution over the Web? If it’s not part of your core business, then it makes perfect sense to tap into an ASP’s expertise and constantly improve applica- tion functionality. You can either piece together various solutions for your computing or business from a number of ASPs, or there are complete business solutions that you can tap into to handle all of your business needs at once. Each approach has its pros and cons. You might want the convenience of managing all of your web-marketing activities from a small-business resource like bCentral. But what if you have very sophisticated needs for an email list, and bCentral does not provide them? You may need to tap into a special mailing list provider to meet that need. Throughout this chapter we will explore both single-service applications and integrated suites of ser- vices. The great thing about the ASP market is that its offerings are constantly improv- ing. Even traditional software providers, such as Peachtree and Microsoft (see Figure 1.1) are moving to an ASP model so that you can pick and choose what works best for Cutting Costs across Your Enterprise: How to Run a Tighter, More Competitive Ship 5 Figure 1.1 Microsoft offers small businesses an ASP solution for Microsoft Office. you. As a business owner, this is a business trend that will have a very direct and pos- itive impact on your bottom line. According to eMarketer’s November 2000 ASP Report: Just over one year ago, there were fewer than 100 ASPs. As of May 2000, this num- ber reached 500, and as of October 2000 the ASP Industry Consortium counted 650 members worldwide. Not unlike the mushrooming growth of B2B exchanges, new application service providers are launching at a spectacular rate. A significant factor behind the growth of the ASP business model is the Internet and the success of network-based computing. In brief, the history of remote deliv- ery of software applications began in the 1960s as businesses shared mainframe computer processing by remotely accessing their services on an as-needed basis. In the 1980s, the development of desktop computing placed software applica- tions on the personal computer at the fringes of the enterprise network. But as client-server computing grew during the last half of the 1990s, the cumbersome task of upgrading and maintaining software applications at the edge of the net- work was switched to a more centralized location at the server level. The growing presence of the Internet, combined with increased and cheaper bandwidth, has further reasserted the vision of network-based computing in which the bulk of information is processed and stored at central locations on a network. Instead of returning to the dumb terminals of the past, however, so- called “thin-terminals” will be the personal computers of the future. Applications will be hosted and their data will be stored on central servers, while users will access the network from simple terminals equipped only with a browser and basic desktop software applications. 6 Chapter 1 The five reasons cited for using an ASP are: II Capital outlay is easier for small businesses that opt to use ASP services. II Monthly subscription fee, rather than up-front installation charges. II Upgrades and maintenance are handled by the ASP. II Start-ups get up and running more quickly with the resources provided by an ASP. II ASPs often have closer relationships with major software providers, thus speeding new product delivery and support. (Sources: Sun Microsystems 1999, eMarketer 1999.) Even industry leader Microsoft has gone the ASP route. You might ask, Why wouldn’t I just use Microsoft Office applications the old way, by installing the software? The answer is: time and money. Distributing and maintaining increasingly complex soft- ware applications on the customer’s desktop has become increasingly expensive in terms of customer service for the software providers. Every time an upgrade is made, millions of customers must be supported and walked through changes and incompat- ibilities. On the user end, the headaches and downtime that result from technical installations (and reinstallations) can cost thousands of dollars in lost productivity and IT support, even for the small business. The ASP model eliminates the specialized IT infrastructure (and headcount) required to make sure that everything is running smoothly. TIP If you’d like to start searching for ASPs for your particular needs right now, go to SearchASP.com, where you will find thousands to choose from (see Figure 1.2). Deborah Lilly, my speaking agent, agrees. “Our biggest challenge was the need to coordinate everyone’s schedules,” she explains. Lilly reviewed five companies for a web-based solution. “We used to handle this on an intranet, and had people dial-in on a dial-up network. They would access their calendar, they could change, add, synchro- nize, and then everyone could access it,” Lilly says. “But now there are too many of us to dial in.” Lilly looked at calendar solutions, and she discovered that having what she needed custom made would cost about $300,000. “None of the companies I looked at had a quick and easy solution, which was to ‘webify’ our Intranet,” she continues. “Finally, I said, Why reinvent the wheel?” She visited the Microsoft site to find a local service that could set her up with an ASP version of Microsoft 2000 Exchange Server with Outlook. “Microsoft has the only solu- tion now, today, that I could use,” Lilly continues. “It’s one that everybody already had, so there was no expense to go out and buy a $500 program for every employee. It made all the sense in the world to use the tools at hand” (see Figure 1.3). Lilly’s solu- tion runs $20 per user per month. “Best of all,” concludes Lilly, “there is no learning curve. If someone doesn’t know how to use Outlook, I send them out to get a tape at the local software store.” Cutting Costs across Your Enterprise: How to Run a Tighter, More Competitive Ship 7 Figure 1.2 At SearchASP.com, you can review hundreds of ASP solutions.
Recommended publications
  • Service Schedule for BT Web Conferencing Service Powered by Microsoft Live Meeting
    Service Schedule for BT Web Conferencing Service powered by Microsoft Live Meeting 1. INTERPRETATION “Account” means an identifier that BT gives to the Customer. This identifier is used on all records. “BT Conferencing” means the business unit of BT that provides conferencing services. “Live Meeting” means the web conferencing service provided under this Contract and is the BT Web Conferencing Service powered by Microsoft Office Live Meeting service. “Microsoft” means PlaceWare Inc a wholly owned subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation. “Organiser” means the person whose account the meeting is booked under. “Presenter” means the person presenting the visual information to the audience. “Participant” means a person or persons connected to the Service. “BT Conference Coordinator” means the individual who will assist during the conference. “Minimum Period” means the initial term as stated in the order form. “Third Party Information” means data, information, video, graphics, sound, music, photographs, software and any other materials (in whatever form) not owned or generated by or on behalf of the Customer, published or otherwise made available by the Customer using Live Meeting 2007. Reference in this Contract to a month shall be deemed to mean a calendar month unless the context requires otherwise. Version 1.1 Page 1 of 6 August 2008 BT1006ee 2. SERVICE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Live Meeting Office Live Meeting provides the ability to share a PC desktop with a group of individuals for the purposes of collaborative working and presentations. Live Meeting uses advanced secure sockets layer encryption as standard. Table of included service features Service Features Number of participants Total number of participants that can join 1250* each meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Workplaces When Metaphors Breakdown
    Virtual Workplaces When Metaphors Breakdown by Thomas W. I. Gallemore B.Arch, Carnegie Mellon, 1991 Submitted to the Department of Architecture in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies in Design Technology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 1998 @ 1998 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of the Author Thomas W. I. Gallemore Department of Architecture May 8,1998 , N 1 Certified By William L. Porter Norman B. and Muriel Leventhal Professor of Architecture and Planning Thesis ervisor Accepted by Roy Strickland Associate Professor of Architecture Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students J1 71998 Virtual Workplaces When Metaphors Breakdown by Thomas W. Gallemore Submitted to the Department of Architecture on May 8, 1998 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies Abstract Our model of work is shaped by the places we choose to work and the tools we choose to work with. As we introduce new technologies and build new environments our model is changing. Today's virtual workplaces are grounded in models of work that have been reformed from our experiences using current technology in physical workspace. However we are discovering opportunities and possibilities for work in collaborative, virtual environments that question physical models. Emerging patterns of distributed collaboration in persistent virtual environments are changing the way we work in time and space, recasting our notion of workplace. Virtual workplaces are interpreted and experienced through metaphors that describe a space of potential for work occurrences. Through the lens of metaphors, this research focuses on breakdowns between collaborative work and the environment in which work occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer-To-Peer Grids
    Syracuse University SURFACE Electrical Engineering and Computer Science College of Engineering and Computer Science 2003 Peer-to-Peer Grids Geoffrey C. Fox Indiana University Dennis Gannon Indiana University Sung-Hoon Ko Indiana University Shrideep Pallickara Indiana University Xiaohong Qiu Indiana University and Syracuse University, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/eecs Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Geoffrey C.; Gannon, Dennis; Ko, Sung-Hoon; Pallickara, Shrideep; Qiu, Xiaohong; and Uyar, Ahmet, "Peer-to-Peer Grids" (2003). Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. 164. https://surface.syr.edu/eecs/164 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Engineering and Computer Science at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Author(s)/Creator(s) Geoffrey C. Fox, Dennis Gannon, Sung-Hoon Ko, Shrideep Pallickara, Xiaohong Qiu, and Ahmet Uyar This book chapter is available at SURFACE: https://surface.syr.edu/eecs/164 Peer-to-Peer Grids Geoffrey Fox1,2,4, Dennis Gannon2, Sung-Hoon Ko1, Sangmi Lee5, Shrideep Pallickara1, Marlon Pierce1, Xiaohong Qiu1,3, Xi Rao1,2, Ahmet Uyar1,3, Minjun Wang1,3, Wenjun Wu1 1Community Grid Computing Laboratory, Indiana University 501 N Morton Suite 224, Bloomington IN 47404 2Computer Science Department, Indiana University
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Corporation
    A Progressive Digital Media business COMPANY PROFILE Microsoft Corporation REFERENCE CODE: 8ABE78BB-0732-4ACA-A41D-3012EBB1334D PUBLICATION DATE: 25 Jul 2017 www.marketline.com COPYRIGHT MARKETLINE. THIS CONTENT IS A LICENSED PRODUCT AND IS NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED OR DISTRIBUTED Microsoft Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Company Overview ........................................................................................................3 Key Facts.........................................................................................................................3 Business Description .....................................................................................................4 History .............................................................................................................................5 Key Employees .............................................................................................................26 Key Employee Biographies .........................................................................................28 Major Products & Services ..........................................................................................35 SWOT Analysis .............................................................................................................36 Top Competitors ...........................................................................................................44 Company View ..............................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search
    Microsoft From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Coordinates: 47°38′22.55″N 122°7′42.42″W / 47.6395972°N 122.12845°W / 47.6395972; -122.12845 Microsoft Corporation Public (NASDAQ: MSFT) Dow Jones Industrial Average Type Component S&P 500 Component Computer software Consumer electronics Digital distribution Computer hardware Industry Video games IT consulting Online advertising Retail stores Automotive software Albuquerque, New Mexico Founded April 4, 1975 Bill Gates Founder(s) Paul Allen One Microsoft Way Headquarters Redmond, Washington, United States Area served Worldwide Key people Steve Ballmer (CEO) Brian Kevin Turner (COO) Bill Gates (Chairman) Ray Ozzie (CSA) Craig Mundie (CRSO) Products See products listing Services See services listing Revenue $62.484 billion (2010) Operating income $24.098 billion (2010) Profit $18.760 billion (2010) Total assets $86.113 billion (2010) Total equity $46.175 billion (2010) Employees 89,000 (2010) Subsidiaries List of acquisitions Website microsoft.com Microsoft Corporation is an American public multinational corporation headquartered in Redmond, Washington, USA that develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of products and services predominantly related to computing through its various product divisions. Established on April 4, 1975 to develop and sell BASIC interpreters for the Altair 8800, Microsoft rose to dominate the home computer operating system (OS) market with MS-DOS in the mid-1980s, followed by the Microsoft Windows line of OSes. Microsoft would also come to dominate the office suite market with Microsoft Office. The company has diversified in recent years into the video game industry with the Xbox and its successor, the Xbox 360 as well as into the consumer electronics market with Zune and the Windows Phone OS.
    [Show full text]
  • IT for Practice 2017
    Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Technology for Practice IT for Practice 2017 October 9–10, 2017, Ostrava, Czech Republic Edited by Jan Ministr Milena Tvrdíková Organized by VŠB - Technical University Ostrava, Centre for Information Technology European University Information Systems - CZ IT Cluster Czech Society for System Integration Moravian-Silesian ISBN 978-80-248-4090-1 (pdf on line) ISBN 978-80-248-4089-5 (printed) VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava Centre for Information Technology Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Technology for Practice 2017 October 9-10, 2017, Ostrava, Czech Republic ISBN 978-80-248-4090-1 (pdf on-line) ISBN 978-80-248-4089-5 (printed) Sponsors of IT for Practice 2017 European University Information Systems IT Cluster Czech Society for Systems Integration VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava Centre for Information Technology EDITORS Ministr Jan Tvrdíková Milena PROGRAM COMMITTEE AND REVIEWERS CHAIRMAN Milena Tvrdíková Members Caridad y Ocerin José Maria, ES Doucek Petr, CZ Chaplyha Vyacheslav, UA Ivanyshyn Sergey, UA Lula Pawel, PL Marček, Dušan, SK Mahnič Viljan, SI Ministr Jan, CZ Olszak Celina, PL Pitner Tomáš, CZ Ráček Jaroslav, CZ Sláma Michal, CZ Sudzina František, DK Wachowiak Mark, CA Yablotchnikov Sergej RU All published papers have been reviewed by 2 independent reviewers before publishing. The proceedings have not been amended or proofread and editors are not responsible for the language used papers. Copyright Author(s) of each paper. Web addres of the conference proceedings http://www.cssi-morava.cz/new/doc/IT2017/sbornik.pdf FOREWORD Conference on Information Technology for Practice 2017 Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the traditional IT4Practice 2017, a conference with international attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • Article About Placeware
    PlaceWare Article by Mike Hayden, February 28, 1999 Mailto: [email protected] http://www.DocumentationExpress.com Introduction. PlaceWare Inc., recently announced its PlaceWare 3.0 Conference Center software that delivers “live” Internet presentations in real-time to audiences anytime, anywhere. Presenters, without leaving their offices, use the Conference Center and the Web to broadcast just-in-time information and training to participants’ desktops. Web-based, real-time conferencing is becoming an important part of corporate communications. Companies, large and small, use web conferencing to reach customers, prospects, and employees. Web-based conferencing speeds the flow of information while slashing the time and expense of traditional training. With PlaceWare’s browser-based web conferencing, there is no need to deploy 100’s of clients. Conference Center does not require installation of time-consuming downloads. (Other products can require large clients up to 30 MB.) Both presenters and attendees can sign on to a Web Conference in just seconds. Presenters simply type a URL, then drag-n-drop their PowerPointÆ presentation into Conference Center. Participants simply type a URL into their browser. PlaceWare has added many new features as a result of working with their customers. By focusing on ease of use, PlaceWare is in good position to lead the market. PlaceWare’s New Product for Smaller Groups. Conference Center popularized the Auditorium Places software that supports large events, structured interactivity. PlaceWare 3.0 now offers new software called Meeting Places for small events. Here’s how they differ: Auditorium Places is preferred for structured seminars and training because it’s optimized for presenting to groups of up to 1,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox-Analysis.Pdf
    XEROX CORPORATION Rescuing and Revitalizing an American Icon April 17, 2018 Prepared by Icahn Capital LP and Deason Capital Services, LLC Disclaimer SECURITY HOLDERS ARE ADVISED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES BY CARL ICAHN, DARWIN DEASON AND THEIR AFFILIATES FROM THE SHAREHOLDERS OF XEROX CORPORATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN XEROX CORPORATION AND FUJIFILM HOLDINGS CORPORATION (THE “TRANSACTION”) AND/OR FOR USE AT THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF XEROX CORPORATION (THE “ANNUAL MEETING”) WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING INFORMATION RELATING TO THE PARTICIPANTS IN SUCH PROXY SOLICITATION. WHEN COMPLETED, A DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND A FORM OF PROXY RELATED TO THE TRANSACTION AND/OR THE ANNUAL MEETING WILL BE MAILED TO SHAREHOLDERS OF XEROX CORPORATION AND WILL ALSO BE AVAILABLE AT NO CHARGE AT THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT http://www.sec.gov/. INFORMATION RELATING TO THE PARTICIPANTS IN SUCH PROXY SOLICITATION IS CONTAINED IN THE SCHEDULE 14A FILED BY CARL ICAHN, DARWIN DEASON AND THEIR RESPECTIVE AFFILIATES WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON MARCH 14, 2018. THIS PRESENTATION CONTAINS OUR CURRENT VIEWS ON THE HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE OF XEROX AND ITS CURRENT MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS, THE VALUE OF XEROX SECURITIES, THE CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED BY XEROX SHAREHOLDERS IN THE TRANSACTION AND CERTAIN ACTIONS THAT XEROX’S BOARD MAY TAKE TO ENHANCE THE VALUE OF ITS SECURITIES. OUR VIEWS ARE BASED ON OUR OWN ANALYSIS OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ASSUMPTIONS WE BELIEVE TO BE REASONABLE. GIVEN XEROX’S HISTORY OF INADEQUATE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE, THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE INFORMATION WE CONSIDERED AND ANALYZED IS ACCURATE OR COMPLETE.
    [Show full text]
  • IVP WEB Printsummary 03012
    ABOUT TEAM PORTFOLIO FOR LIMITED PARTNERS NEWS CONTACT IVP History Institutional Venture Partners (IVP) was founded by Reid Dennis in 1980. IVP was one of the first venture firms on Sand Hill Road, and Reid put IVP on the map by raising the first IVP fund, a $22 million venture capital fund. Over thirty years later, the firm continues to partner with exceptional entrepreneurs to create market leaders for the future. IVP recently raised IVP XIV, a $1 billion later-stage venture capital and growth equity fund, and manages $4 billion in committed capital. IVP HISTORY IVP ADVANTAGE WORKING WITH IVP INVESTMENT CRITERIA CHOOSING A VC ABOUT TEAM PORTFOLIO FOR LIMITED PARTNERS NEWS CONTACT The IVP Advantage Service There are more than 400 venture capital and growth equity firms IVP believes that the most talented management teams deserve an exceptional today managing over $400 billion. Capital is important, but what financial partner. With every investment we make, we enter into a long-term distinguishes top-tier firms today is the expertise of their financial business relationship with the entrepreneurs. IVP helps our companies review key partners and the resources that they provide to help their portfolio business strategies, recruit great executives, and establish strategic partnerships. companies succeed. IVP's partners collectively have more than We assist with all aspects of a company's financial strategy, including future rounds 100 years of venture capital and operating experience. of financings, mergers and acquisitions, and the planning and preparation for an IPO. Perspective IVP HISTORY IVP believes that building differentiated businesses takes time and perseverance.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property - Strategy and Policy ACIVES
    Intellectual Property - Strategy and Policy ACIVES By Rishi Ahuja B.E., Electronics Engineering University of Pune, 1997 ES Submitted to the System Design and Management Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 2012 @ 2012 Rishi Ahuja. All rights Reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. S ig natu re o f A utho r.................................................(..,..... ..................................... Rishi Ahuja System Design and Management Program Ce rtifie d by...................................... ....... ....... .......... /'Joe Hadzima /Senior Lecturer, MIT Entrepreneurship Center Thesis Supervisor Acce pte d by.......................................................... ........... .......... Pat Hale Thesis Supervisor and Director, System Design and Management Program 1 Intellectual Property - Strategy and Policy By Rishi Ahuja B.E., Electronics Engineering University of Pune, 1997 Submitted to the System Design and Management Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management Abstract The thesis that follows is an attempt to gain a deeper understanding of intellectual property from a policy as well as a strategic perspective. While the discussion that follows is applicable to intellectual property in general, the focus of this thesis is on a particular aspect of intellectual property i.e patents. Policy and strategic perspectives are covered in section I and 11 respectively. The section on policy explores the origin and evolution of intellectual property related policies by discussing key legislation and court cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitting in Conferencing Seeks Place in a Unified Communications World 04/30/2007 Tara Seals
    Fitting In Conferencing Seeks Place In a Unified Communications World 04/30/2007 Tara Seals AMIDST MOVEMENTS by Cisco Systems Inc. and Microsoft Corp. to integrate conferencing as simply one more application within a unified communications framework, Web and audio conferencing service providers are taking stock of the opportunities and threats within a newly converged landscape of collaboration — and are repositioning to compete. “You have two 800-pound gorillas in this market now,” explains Lou Guercia, CEO at conferencing provider WebDialogs, which offers resale and agent opportunities. “It will take a little while for conferencing service providers to figure out where to go from here. They need to think that they’re sleeping with the enemy if they partner with them, but can you afford not to partner?” There’s a lot at stake. Wainhouse Research shows global conferencing services growing at a 5 percent CAGR to exceed $4.5 billion in 2010. Double-digit growth of 11 percent is forecast for Web conferencing alone. And unified communications providers will be capturing most of that revenue. For agents and resellers, understanding where to capitalize with audio and Web conferencing means understanding this market shift. “One of the major trends will be growth of new markets and services associated with the enterprise deployment of unified communications,” says Marc Beattie, senior analyst with Wainhouse. Indeed, Chadwick Martin Bailey shows four UC vendors in the top six preferred conferencing providers. “The growing demand for UC solutions means that the future for conferencing and other voice applications is about integration with other end-user applications, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ultimate Virtual Engagement E-Book
    The Ultimate Virtual Engagement E-Book | Go to CTAurl.com 1 THE ULTIMATE Virtual Engagement E-BOOK 21 Surefire Ways to Make Your Next Virtual Event or Webinar More Profitable, Successful & Engaging Presented by: Andrew M. Davis | Creator of The Loyalty Loop Contents Ch 1: We All Know Virtual Events Can Be Boring… But Here’s the REAL Reason Why Your Viewers Aren’t Engaged ( pg 6 ) Ch 2: Time to Reinvent Virtual Events ( pg 16 ) Ch 3: The Three-Legged Stool: 21 Surefire Ways to Boost Engagement for Your Next Virtual Event ( pg 28 ) Ch 4: The Future of Virtual Events ( pg 48 ) The Ultimate Virtual Engagement E-Book | bit.ly/21ideasvideo 2 In early March of 2020, Ann Handley was at Boston Logan for an early morning flight to San Diego. She was heading to Social Media Marketing World, where she was to deliver a keynote presentation to 4,000 social media marketers from around the world. At the gate, she bumped into her friend Chris Penn, who was heading to the same conference. “Hey,” he greeted her, his voice muffled through a mask that looked like a respirator a steel worker might wear. Chris was always vigilant about germs on flights, Ann thought. That’s just Chris. But as they boarded their flight, Chris pointed out that this plane had just come from Seattle, where a case of a new virus had been diagnosed in a man who had just arrived back home from an international trip. That case was one of the first in the US.
    [Show full text]