Full Schedule

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Full Schedule full schedule THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Registration McKenna Hall 4:30 p.m. – 5:30 p.m. Panel Discussion on Drawing in Architecture Schools Today Smith Ballroom, Morris Inn Michael Lykoudis – Dean, School of Architecture University of Notre Dame Christian Sottile – Dean, School of Building Arts Savannah College of Art and Design Moderator: Ed Keegan 6:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. Keynote – Nicholas Carr Smith Ballroom, Morris Inn Author of The Shallows “Underestimating the Human: The Limits of Automation” 7:30 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. Reception Bond Hall School of Architecture Dinner on your own FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30 8:00 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. Registration, Coffee and Continental Breakfast McKenna Hall COLLOQUIUM SESSIONS 1 Friday, 9:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Auditorium Janet Parks “The Forensics of Drawings: Reflections on American Architectural Drawings” Curator of Drawings and Archives, Avery Library, Columbia University Jeffrey Cohen “Tides of Graphic Intention: Resonant Shifts Among 19th Cent. Architectural Drawings” Dept. of Growth and Structure of Cities, Bryn Mawr College Moderator: Dennis Doordan 102 Ralph Muldrow “Drawing Charleston: From Thomas U. Walter to Albert Simons” College of Charleston Jhennifer A. Amundson “Hand Drawing and the Genesis of the Architecture Profession in the United States” Judson University G. Michael Ramirez “Pyramids and Obelisks on the Skyline: Nicholas Hawksmoor’s Drawings and His Design Process” Ph.D., University of Cambridge Moderator: Viveca Pattison Robichaud - 2 - 106 George Martin “Lessons from Carthage” College of Architecture, Art and Design, Mississippi State University Mark O’Bryan “Teaching Architectural Orders of Construction: Aligning Hand Drawing Mastery with Thinking and Seeing” College of Design, University of Kentucky Llewellyn Seibold, Ariel Solis “Design Education with BIM: Its Prospect and Problems When Compared with Traditional Drawing Techniques” School of Architecture, Andrews University Moderator: Kalinda Gathinji 112 David Fox “Critical Vision: How Freehand Drawing Shapes Beginning Design” College of Architecture and Design, U. of Tennessee Carl Smith (Noah Billig, Kimball Erdman) “Shaking Hands with the Landscape: Drawing and Perceptualist Endeavor in a Landscape Architecture Studio Curriculum” School of Architecture and Design, University of Arkansas Margaret McManus “In-Line Chats: The Art of Conversation through Sketching” School of Architecture, Marywood University Moderator: Kim Rollings 200 Joseph Zvejnieks “Bridging the Divide: Utilizing Digital Software to Produce Hand Drawn Rendeings” Renderer, Ferguson & Shamamian Architects, LLP Eric Osth, David Csont “Drawing as an Integral Part of an International Practice” Urban Design Associates Richard Cameron “Refining Architecture: The Use of Rendering in the Design Work of Atelier & Co” Atelier & Co. Moderator: Samantha Salden Teach 202 Richard Economakis “On Site Drawing as Corrective Measure” School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame John Cluver “The Art and Craft of Hand Drawing in Historic Preservation” Voith & Mactavish Architects LLP Marianne Cusato “Drawing with Efficiency: Making Sure the Medium Does Not Become a Stakeholder in the Design” School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame Moderator: Todd Zeiger 210 Stephen Chrisman “The Importance of Hand Drawing in Modern Practice: The Work of Ferguson and Shamamian Architects” Ferguson & Shamamian Architects, LLP Thomas Rajkovich “Pentimenti: On the Path to the Realization of the Idea(l)” Thomas Norman Rajkovich Architect, LTD Thomas D. Stroka “Disegno Oggigiorno: Hand Drawing in Architectural Practice Today” Duncan G. Stroik Architect, LLC Moderator: William Heyer - 3 - 10:15 a.m. – 10:45 a.m. Morning Break 10:45 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Keynote – Graham Wyatt Auditorium, McKenna Hall Principal, Robert A. M. Stern Architects, LLP “Architectural Models: Three-Dimensional Sketches” 12:10 p.m. – 1:20 p.m. Lunch McKenna Hall COLLOQUIUM SESSIONS 2 Friday, 1:30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Auditorium George Knight “Drawing Ain’t Dead: A Postcard from New Haven” Knight Architecture LLC Christine Franck “The Necessity for Drawing in the Education of the Architect” Center for Advanced Research in Traditional Architecture, College of Architecture and Planning, University of Colorado Denver Brian Kelly “Drawn References: An Agenda for Observation, Documentation, Analysis, and Representation in Support of Architectural Field Studies” Director, Architecture Program, University of Maryland Moderator: Catesby Leigh 102 Alessandro Pierattini “Ancient Greek Architecture: Design Without Drawing?” School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame Bernd Kulawik “The Role of Hand Drawings in Studies of Ancient Architecture” ETH Zurich Lane M. Duncan “The Fourth Moon of Jupiter: Raphael Sanzio” School of Architecture, Georgia Tech Moderator: Robin Rhodes 106 Eamonn Canniffe “Drawing as an Exploration of Urban Space” School of Architecture, Manchester Metropolitan University Eric Jenkins “Designing Learning Experiences: From Experience to Design and Back Again” School of Architecture, Catholic University of America Jose Lorenzo-Torres “Hand Drawings as Ways of Apprehending Architectural Space” Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Moderator: Douglas Duany 112 Rocco Ceo “FSD: A Brief History of the Full Size Detail/Full Size Drawing, and its Role in the Construction of Vizcaya from 1913-1921” School of Architecture, University of Miami Denis McNamara “The Artist as Architect: Edward Schulte and the Role of the Artist in Church Design” The Liturgical Institute, Mundelein Seminary Aaron Helfand “Eclecticism and Caricature in the Architecture of Edmund March Wheelwright” Albert, Richter & Tittmann Architects, Inc. Moderator: Thomas Dietz - 4 - 200 Kendra Schank Smith “Understanding Architecture through Drawings” Dept. of Architectural Science, Ryerson University Margaret Tarampi “On the Cognitive Benefits of Drawing: Mental Processes, Spatial Ability and Expertise” Dept. of Psychology, University of Utah Mark Alan Hewitt “Draw in Order to See: Internal and External Memory Loops in Architectural Cognition” Mark Alan Hewitt Architects Moderator: Vinod Goel 202 James Dougherty “The Role of Hand-Drawn ‘Indication’ in the Design of Urban Buildings” Dover, Kohl & Partners Henrique Houayek “Born to See, My Task is to Draw: Cultivating Architectural Intelligence Through Observation and Hand Drawing” Clemson University Victor Agran “Radical Architecture and the Generative Power of Drawing” School of Architecture, Yale Moderator: David Csont 210 Richard Sammons “The Art of the Working Drawing” Fairfax & Sammons Architects John Haigh “Early 20th Cent. Case Studies on Whether Firms Differentiated the Artist from the Technician” Benedictine College Braulio Casas “Hand Drawing, Design, and the Art of the Architectural Conversation” Braulio Casas Architects P.A. Moderator: Aimee Buccellato 2:45 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Afternoon Break COLLOQUIUM SESSIONS 3 Friday, 3:15 p.m. – 4:45 p.m. Auditorium Leland Roth “Building the Neural Pathways for Architecture: A Short History of Hand Drawing” University of Oregon Phil Jacks “Restoring the Ancient City in Renaissance Rome: The Drawing as Palimpsest” George Washington University Moderator: Denis McNamara 102 Alvin Holm “How Drawing is Taught: The Ècole des Beaux-Arts and the University of Pennsylvania” Alvin Holm A.I.A. Architects William Heyer “Form Follows Hand Drawing: How Modernism was Born of Hand Drawing and How Modernist Hand Drawing Techniques Can Lead to a Fuller Understanding of Architecture” William Heyer Architect David Rinehart “Representation and Reality in the Work of Marcello Piacentini” Robert A. M. Stern Architects LLP Moderator: Thomas Stroka - 5 - 112 R. Michael Graham, Phillip J. Liederbach “Hand Drawing at Liederbach and Graham” Liederbach & Graham Architects Kahlil Hamady “The Craft, Artistry, and Practicality of Architectural Hand Drawing” Hamady Architects Moderator: Ed Keegan 200 Tom Lowing “Hand Drawing Prevails in Professional Practice” School of Architecture, Andrews University Robert Gordon “The Freehand Sketchbook” Robert Gordon Associates James Douglas “The Drawing Discipline: Earning our Inheritance” RLPS Architects Moderator: Craig Konyk 202 Alexander Fernandez “Seeing through the Hand - Drawing in Contemporary Practice” Principal and Design Director, Gensler David Buege “Abstract, Haptic, Optic, and Conceptual” University of Arkansas Alice Enz “100 Drawings in 100 Days: Reconnecting with the Pen to Improve Practice and Design” Torti Gallas and Partners Moderator: Patricia Morgado 210 Anthony Visco “The Relationship between the Human Body and Architecture” Atelier for the Sacred Arts Doug Cooper “Imagination’s Hand” School of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University Johannes and Markus Albl “The Role of Hand Drawing in Wood Carving” ALBL Oberammergau GbR Moderator: George Martin 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m. Keynote – Joseph Connors Auditorium, McKenna Hall Dept. of History of Art and Architecture, Harvard University Author of Borromini and the Roman Oratory “Borromini and the Graphite Revolution in Early Modern Architecture” Dinner on your own - 6 - SATURDAY, OCTOBER 1 8:00 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. Coffee and Continental Breakfast McKenna Hall COLLOQUIUM SESSIONS 4 Saturday, 9:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Auditorium Aric Lasher “Drawing: The Analog Cloud. The Versatility of the Pencil in the Imaginative Process and Contemporary Architectural Practice” HBRA Architects Anton Glikin “Drawing as a Method of Creation of a Form: The Case of Peter Pennoyer Architects”
Recommended publications
  • Charleston County South Carolina PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN
    Snee l"a.rm Ncar 'liOW1t Pleasant HiiBS !l0. Se-87 Charleston County South Carolina \"~ /\ E; ~;: L ., ..... ~',.-. • i 0' . ['i.>l(>. Ii ,\ PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORIC AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA • District of South Carolina Historic American Buildings Survey Prepared at Washington Office for Southeast Unit HJ..Bf No .. S::;EF~ FARi,,; Ner<.r :,~ount Pleasant, Chp<rlestC!l County I South Ca.rolina Ouic or ercctlon: c. 1750 Present co'~dition: Excellent frDJ:O construction; rectanc),lo..r plan; marble mantel, Adam de- sign .. A,lditc.onal data, One-ti:r.e horne of Colone 1 Charles Pinckney. ,'!as in Pinckney fami ly for sevent:! years • Othe~ e~~stinG !,ccords: .~ •• Cr,.arleston l:useu.T.1 Prepared by Junior Architect James L .. Burnett, Jr .. , " Approved :' Ii \,}.. J 4/! -;c. " Addendum To: SNEE FARM HABS NO. SC-87 1240 Long Point Road • Charleston Coun~y South Carolina PHOTOGRAPHS AND WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA • REDUCED COPIES OF IfEASURED DRAHINGS • Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service Department of the Interior • Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 ~A6S 5(. , \O-(i\ouf)v HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY j ~) - SNEE FARM • HABS NO. SC-87 Location: 1240 Long Point Road, Mt. Pleasant, Charleston County, South Carolina 4.6 miles NE of Mt. Pleasant on US Hwy 17; turn left on County Road 97 (Long Point Road); continue 0.7 mile and turn left on dirt road; house is 0.1 mile down dirt road on left. UTM: 17.609960.3634640 Present Owner: National Park Service Present Use: Vacant Significance: The Charles Pinckney Historic Site, known traditionally as "Snee Farm," is the ancestral country seat of Charles pinckney III, the American patriot and statesman.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Building Survey of Upper King, Upper Meeting Street and Intersecting Side Streets Charleston, South Carolina
    ______________________________________________________________________________ HISTORIC BUILDING SURVEY OF UPPER KING, UPPER MEETING STREET AND INTERSECTING SIDE STREETS CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA Figure 1. Bird’s Eye of Upper King and Meeting Streets Prepared by: HPCP 290 Maymester 2009 The College of Charleston Charleston, South Carolina 29401 MAY 2009 ______________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Six students at the College of Charleston Historic Preservation & Community Planning Program put the following historic building survey and report for Upper King and Meeting Streets as part of a class project in May 2009 for the City of Charleston Department of Planning, Preservation & Economic Innovation. The main points of contact were Debbi Hopkins, Senior Preservation Planner for the City of Charleston and Dr. Barry Stiefel, Visiting Assistant Professor for the College of Charleston and Clemson University. Dr. Stiefel served as the Project Manager for the historic building survey and was assisted by Meagan Baco, MSHP, from the joint College of Charleston-Clemson University Graduate Historic Preservation Program, who served as Graduate Student Instructor and Principle Investigator. Ms. Baco’s Master’s Thesis, One-way to Two-way Street Conversions as a Preservation and Downtown Revitalization Tool: The Case Study of Upper King Street, Charleston, South Carolina, focused on the revitalization of the Upper King Street area. However, this survey project and report would not have been possible
    [Show full text]
  • The Movement of Architectural Elements Within Charleston, South Carolina
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2009 The oM vement of Architectural Elements within Charleston, South Carolina Laura Burghardt Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Burghardt, Laura, "The oM vement of Architectural Elements within Charleston, South Carolina" (2009). All Theses. 596. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/596 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MOVEMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS WITHIN CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University and the Graduate School of the College of Charleston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Historic Preservation by Laura Ashley Burghardt May 2009 Accepted by: Jonathan H. Poston, Committee Chair Ashley Robbins Wilson Ralph C. Muldrow Robert D. Russell, Jr., Ph.D. i ABSTRACT The movement of architectural elements from one building to another within Charleston, South Carolina, is an integral part of historic preservation in the city. From the earliest days of the city’s historic preservation movement in the 1920s, preservationists have understood the importance of preserving elements of historic structures. In the early twentieth century, architectural elements were threatened by antique dealers and collectors of architecture who sought to purchase decorative elements, even out of standing houses. Buildings were also threatened with demolition as gas stations and other modern structures were constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation and the New Deal
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations Summer 2019 Restoring America: Historic Preservation and the New Deal Stephanie E. Gray Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Gray, S. E.(2019). Restoring America: Historic Preservation and the New Deal. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5433 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESTORING AMERICA: HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND THE NEW DEAL by Stephanie E. Gray Bachelor of Arts Mount Holyoke College, 2013 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2016 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2019 Accepted by: Lauren Rebecca Sklaroff, Major Professor Robert Weyeneth, Committee Member Patricia Sullivan, Committee Member Lydia Mattice Brandt, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Stephanie E. Gray, 2019 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION For my mother, Lucy Gray. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is said that writing a dissertation is a solitary venture. While that is true to some extent, no dissertation is completed without the support of many people in many places. First, I extend my deepest gratitude to my wonderful committee. To my advisor, Lauren Sklaroff, tremendous thanks for accepting me as a student and teaching me to think and write like a cultural historian.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Simons Papers, 1864-1979 1253.00 Boxes 26/1-77
    Albert Simons papers, 1864-1979 1253.00 Boxes 26/1-77 Creator: Simons, Albert, 1890-1980. Description: 28 linear ft. Biographical/historical note: Charleston, S.C. architect. A graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, Simons was a fellow of the American Institute of Architects (A.I.A.). He served as an instructor in architecture at Clemson College and was a partner in the architectural firm of Todd, Simons & Todd. After military service in World War I, Simons returned to Charleston and with Samuel Lapham established the architectural firm of Simons & Lapham. He was a lecturer on fine arts and a professor of engineering at the College of Charleston. A recognized architectural authority, Simons was among the pioneers in Charleston's preservation and restoration movement and was a major influence in the American preservation movement. The son of T. Grange Simons and Serena D. Aiken, he married Harriet P. Stoney in 1917. Simons died in 1980. Scope and content: Papers consist of correspondence and other materials concerning Simons' professional and personal affiliations and pursuits, as well as writings, architectural drawings, and other items. Included are the papers of Harriet P. Stoney Simons and a photograph album of Simons & Lapham. Correspondence includes some personal and family letters but mostly pertains to Simons' involvement in organizations concerned with historic preservation and restoration in Charleston and nationwide; affairs of the National Academy of Design and other national arts organizations; activities of the S.C. Board of Architectural Examiners, the S.C. chapter of A.I.A., and other professional organizations; public housing projects; architectural work of Simons & Lapham; Charleston zoning and city planning matters; the Charleston Board of Architectural Review; operations and relations of the Dock Street Theater and Carolina Art Association; the Charleston Library Society; the Poetry Society of S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of Virtual Heritage Reconstruction in Lost Ansonborough
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2012 The otP ential of Virtual Heritage Reconstruction in Lost Ansonborough Caglar Aydin Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Aydin, Caglar, "The otP ential of Virtual Heritage Reconstruction in Lost Ansonborough" (2012). All Theses. 1353. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1353 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POTENTIAL OF VIRTUAL HERITAGE RECONSTRUCTION IN LOST ANSONBOROUGH A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Historic Preservation by Caglar Aydin May 2012 Accepted by: Ashley R. Wilson, AIA and ASID, Committee Chair Carter L. Hudgins, Ph.D. James L. Ward ABSTRACT The virtual reconstruction of vanished heritage is a well-known practice in the preservation field. The constant development in computer technologies has been improving visualization and interpretation techniques for virtual reconstructions of no longer extant or inaccessible sites. Reconstruction projects of vanished heritage sites implement various approaches because of different challenges at each site. This research involves 3D reconstructions, as well as historical research of early nineteenth century residences, Radcliffe- King and Gabriel Manigault houses in the Ansonborough neighborhood of Charleston, South Carolina, USA. The demolition of these two mansions in the first half of the twentieth century leads to the loss of the residential character at the intersection of George and Meeting Streets in Ansonborough.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Architecture of Augustus Edison Constantine, and the Need for Preservation Policy Reform in Charleston, South Carolina for the Twenty First Century
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2000 Avoiding the Theme Park: A Study of the Architecture of Augustus Edison Constantine, and the Need for Preservation Policy Reform in Charleston, South Carolina for the Twenty First Century Lissa D'Aquisto Felzer University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Felzer, Lissa D'Aquisto, "Avoiding the Theme Park: A Study of the Architecture of Augustus Edison Constantine, and the Need for Preservation Policy Reform in Charleston, South Carolina for the Twenty First Century" (2000). Theses (Historic Preservation). 442. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/442 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Felzer, Lissa D'Aquisto (2000). Avoiding the Theme Park: A Study of the Architecture of Augustus Edison Constantine, and the Need for Preservation Policy Reform in Charleston, South Carolina for the Twenty First Century. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/442 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Avoiding the Theme Park: A Study of the Architecture of Augustus Edison Constantine, and the Need for Preservation Policy Reform in Charleston, South Carolina for the Twenty First Century Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Felzer, Lissa D'Aquisto (2000). Avoiding the Theme Park: A Study of the Architecture of Augustus Edison Constantine, and the Need for Preservation Policy Reform in Charleston, South Carolina for the Twenty First Century.
    [Show full text]
  • Ralph C. Muldrow, R.A
    R A L P H C . M U L D R O W , R . A . 81 Moultrie Street, Charleston, South Carolina 29403 (843) 853 – 9862 EDUCATION: University of Pennsylvania M.ARCH. – Master of Architecture – 1993 M.S. – Master of Science in Historic Preservation – 1993 University of Virginia B.S. – Bachelor of Science in Architecture – 1985 B.A. – Bachelor of Arts in Political and Social Thought – 1984 -Degree with distinction, Echols Scholar (Top 7% of entering class) -Omicron Delta Kappa (National Leadership Honor Society) AWARDS: -Charles E. Peterson Senior Research Fellowship in Architectural History -John Nolen Research Award, Cornell University - Congress for the New Urbanism design Award for “A Vision for Marion Square” -“In Praise of Teaching Award,” for faculty/student research -Community Preservation Award, Committee to Save the City -Faculty Research Grant - Honorable Mention, National Layers of the Landscape Competition - Honorable Mention, Royal Oaks National Design Competition -SC Humanities Grant -Graham Foundation Grant - Albert Binder travel grant, University of Pennsylvania -Van Schaak Hopkins History Award EXPERIENCE: Licensed Architect (New Jersey License #13350) Current Simons Chair in Historic Preservation Associate Professor of Art History (tenured) Founding co-director,,Program in Historic Preservation and Community Planning Department of Art History, College of Charleston – Charleston, South Carolina Adjunct Professor, Clemson University, Founding Director, Joint Clemson/College of Charleston Graduate Program in Historic Preservation for the College of Charleston Teaching includes the following coursework: Introduction to Historic Preservation, Urban Planning, Urban Design Studio, Architectural Design Studio, Preservation Planning Studio, Vernacular Architecture and Material Culture, Architecture and Preservation in Italy, and other subjects. Co-founded Program in Historic Preservation and Community Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ART of ARCHITECTURE: Hand Drawing and Design University of Notre Dame Sept
    THE ART OF ARCHITECTURE: Hand drawing and design University of notre dame Sept. 29 – Oct. 1, 2016 CONFERENCE SPEAKERS KEYNOTES Nicholas Carr "Underestimating the Human: The Limits of Automation" Thursday, 6:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. Author of The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains Graham Wyatt "Architectural Models: Three-Dimensional Sketches" Friday, 10:45 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Robert A.M. Stern Architects, LLP Joseph Connors "Borromini and the Graphite Revolution in Early Modern Architectural Drawing" Friday, 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m. Dept. of History of Art and Architecture, Harvard University Author of Borromini and the Roman Oratory PANEL DISCUSSION Thursday, 4:30 p.m. – 5:30 p.m. Christian Sottile, Michael Lykoudis, Judy DiMaio, David Mohney SESSION 1 Friday, 9:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Janet Parks "The Forensics of Drawings: Reflections on American Architectural Drawings" Curator of Drawings and Archives, Columbia University Jeffrey Cohen "Tides of Graphic Intention: Resonant Shifts Among 19th Century Architectural Drawings" Dept. of Growth and Structure of Cities, Bryn Mawr College Jhennifer A. Amundson "Hand Drawing and the Genesis of the Architecture Profession in the United States” Judson University Ralph Muldrow "Drawing Charleston: From Thomas U. Walter to Albert Simons" College of Charleston Mike Ramirez "Evoking Antiquity: Nicholas Hawksmoor's Drawings and His Design Process for the London Churches" Mark O'Bryan "Teaching Architectural Orders of Construction: Aligning Hand Drawing Mastery with Thinking and Seeing" College of Design, University of Kentucky Llewellyn Seibold, Ariel Solis "Design Education with BIM: Its Prospect and Problems When Compared with Traditional Drawing Techniques" School of Architecture, Andrews University George Martin "Lessons from Carthage" College of Architecture, Art and Design, Mississippi State University David Fox "Critical Vision: How Freehand Drawing Shapes Beginning Design" College of Architecture and Design, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring the Dock Street Theatre: Cultural Production in New-Deal Era Charleston, South Carolina Stephanie E
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 6-30-2016 Restoring the Dock Street Theatre: Cultural Production in New-Deal Era Charleston, South Carolina Stephanie E. Gray University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Public History Commons Recommended Citation Gray, S. E.(2016). Restoring the Dock Street Theatre: Cultural Production in New-Deal Era Charleston, South Carolina. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3532 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESTORING THE DOCK STREET THEATRE: CULTURAL PRODUCTION IN NEW-DEAL ERA CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA by Stephanie E. Gray Bachelor of Arts Mount Holyoke College, 2013 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Public History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2016 Accepted by: Lauren Sklaroff, Director of Thesis Marjorie Spruill, Reader Lacy Ford, Senior Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright by Stephanie E. Gray, 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, my deepest gratitude goes to my advisor, Dr. Lauren Sklaroff, and my second reader, Dr. Marjorie Spruill. I am thankful for the great enthusiasm they have shown for this project and helpful feedback they have provided. They both have inspired me to read more, research smarter, and write better. The final version of this thesis also has been enriched by insightful comments from Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of the William Martin Aiken Papers, 1878-1956
    Inventory of the William Martin Aiken Papers, 1878-1956 Addlestone Library, Special Collections College of Charleston 66 George Street Charleston, SC 29424 USA http://archives.library.cofc.edu Phone: (843) 953-8016 | Fax: (843) 953-6319 Table of Contents Descriptive Summary................................................................................................................ 3 Biographical Note...................................................................................................................... 3 Collection Overview...................................................................................................................4 Restrictions................................................................................................................................ 4 Search Terms............................................................................................................................4 Administrative Information......................................................................................................... 5 Detailed Description of the Collection.......................................................................................6 Sketchbooks, sketches, and working drawings................................................................. 6 Photographs....................................................................................................................... 8 Clippings.............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Grange Simons III, HIS FOREBEARS and RELATIONS
    Thomas Grange Simons III, HIS FOREBEARS AND RELATIONS Bv ROBERT BENTHAM SIMONS REAR ADMIRAL, U.S.N. (Retired) PritJately Printed. Charleston 1954 Pnt114tl Jo,,,, ,111 11111/,or THE R.. L. BR.YAN COMPANY CoLVMBIA, S. C. ALBERT SIMONS, WILLIAM LUCAS SIMONS, JOSEPH AIKEN SIMONS THOMAS GRANGE SIMONS III ROBERT BENTHAM SIMONS, THOMAS GRANGE SIMONS IV CONTENTS PAGE Preface • . • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • V •• Compiler's Note . • • • • • • • • • • • Vll ••• List of Works Consulted • • • • • • • • • • • Vll1 • Editor's Note • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1X Section I: Simons of South Carolina: The Descendants of Benjamin Simons I . 1 Notes on the Simons Family . 73 Section II: Accounts of Some of the Families Related to the Sim- ons Family . • . 9 S Aiken . • . • • • • • • 96 Notes• on the Aiken Family . • . 104 Bentham . 128 Notes on the Bentham Family • . • • • . 131 Chicken . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 135 Cordes . 137 Hume . 139 Notes on the Hume Family . 141 Keating . 144 Lucas . • • . 145 Notes on the Lucas Family . 147 Marion . • . • . 148 Martin . • . 1SO Notes on the Martin Family . • . 155 CONTENTS-( Continued) PAGE Mayrant . • . 15 6 Notes on the Mayrant Family . 158 Mazyck . • . • . 159 Notes on the Mazyck Family . • • • . • . 160 Noble • • . • . • • . • . 163 Richardson . • . • . • • • • • • . 164 Villepontoux-Moore . • • • • • • • . 166 Section III: Appendix • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 167 Grant of Land from the Lords Proprietors to Ben­ jamin Simons, 7 May 1709 . • • . 168 Middleburg Plantation . • . 169 Lewisfield Plantation . • • . 169 Pompion Hill (Punkin Hill) Chapel . • • • . 170 Letter of T. Grange Simons I to Ann Ball Simons, 21 June 1862 •........... 170 Letter of T. Grange Simons III to Francis Caroline Bentham, 9 September 1863 . 172 Letter of T. Grange Simons III to Mary Hume Sim- ons, 20 Oct. 1878 . 174 Military Records of the Simons Family and their Connections .
    [Show full text]