DOCSLIB.ORG

Lung Cancer Drugs in the Pipeline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lung Cancer Drugs in the Pipeline HemOnc today | JANUARY 10, 2016 | Healio.com/HemOnc 5 Lung Cancer Drugs in the Pipeline HEMONC TODAY presents this guide to drugs in phase 2 or phase 3 development for lung cancer-related indications. Clinicians can use this chart as a quick reference to learn about the status of those drugs that may be clinically significant to their practice. Generic name (Brand name, Manufacturer) Indication(s) Development status abemaciclib (Eli Lilly) non–small cell lung cancer phase 3 ABP 215 (Allergan/Amgen) non–small cell lung cancer (advanced disease) phase 3 ACP-196 (Acerta Pharma) non–small cell lung cancer (advanced disease) phase 2 ado-trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla, Genentech) non–small cell lung cancer (HER-2–positive disease) phase 2 afatinib (Gilotrif, Boehringer Ingelheim) lung cancer (squamous cell carcinoma) phase 3 aldoxorubicin (CytRx) small cell lung cancer phase 2 alectinib (Alecensa, Genentech) non–small cell lung cancer (second-line treatment of ALK-positive disease) phase 2 non–small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment of ALK-positive disease); phase 3 alisertib (Takeda) malignant mesothelioma, small cell lung cancer phase 2 avelumab (EMD Serono/Pfizer) non–small cell lung cancer phase 3 AZD9291 (AstraZeneca) non–small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment of advancedEGFR -positive disease; phase 3 second-line treatment of advanced EGFR-positive, T790M-positive disease) bavituximab (Peregrine Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer (previously treated advanced/metastatic disease) phase 3 belinostat (Beleodaq, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) non–small cell lung cancer (adjuvant therapy) phase 3 BI 695502 (Boehringer Ingelheim) non–small cell lung cancer (nonsquamous histology) phase 3 BIND-014 (BIND Therapeutics) non–small cell lung cancer (KRAS-mutated disease; squamous histology disease) phase 2 brigatinib (ARIAD) non–small cell lung cancer (ALK-positive disease) phase 2 carfilzomib (Kyprolis, Onyx Pharmaceuticals) small cell lung cancer phase 2 CC-486 (Celgene) non–small cell lung cancer (advanced disease) phase 2 CD40LGVAX (Cellular Biomedicine) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 ceritinib (Zykadia, Novartis) non–small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment of treatment-naive, phase 2 ALK-positive disease) crenolanib (AROG Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 custirsen (OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer (advanced disease) phase 3 CX-01 (Cantex Pharmaceuticals) small cell lung cancer phase 2 dabrafenib (Tafinlar, Novartis) non–small cell lung cancer (combination therapy for BRAF V600-positive disease) phase 2 dacomitinib (Pfizer) non–small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant disease) phase 3 denosumab (Xgeva, Amgen) non–small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment of metastatic disease) phase 2 DPV-001 (UbiVac) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 durvalumab (MedImmune) non–small cell lung cancer (stage III disease; third-line treatment of phase 3 PD-L1–positive disease) EGF816 (Novartis) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 emibetuzumab (Eli Lilly) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 entinostat (Syndax Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 epacadostat (Incyte) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 eribulin (Halaven, Eisai) non–small cell lung cancer phase 3 erlotinib (Tarceva, Genentech) non–small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment of metastatic, EGFR-positive disease) phase 3 everolimus (Afinitor, Novartis) neuroendocrine lung tumors phase 3 evofosfamide (TH-302; EMD Serono, Threshold Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 ficlatuzumab (AVEO Oncology) non–small cell lung cancer (advanced disease) phase 2 ganetespib (Synta Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 3 GI-4000 (GlobeImmune) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 Imprime PGG (Biothera) non–small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment of metastatic disease) phase 2 INC280 (Novartis) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 INCB39110 (Incyte) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 ipilimumab (Yervoy, Bristol-Myers Squibb) non–small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment, squamous histology) phase 3 lenvatinib (Lenvima, Eisai) non–small cell lung cancer (third-line treatment; RET translocations) phase 2 lucitanib (Clovis Oncology) non–small cell lung cancer (squamous histology) phase 2 LY2510924 (Eli Lilly) small cell lung cancer phase 2 LY3023414 (Eli Lilly) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 ME-344 (MEI Pharma) small cell lung cancer phase 2 6 HemOnc today | JANUARY 10, 2016 | Healio.com/HemOnc Lung Cancer Drugs in the Pipeline Generic name (Brand name, Manufacturer) Indication(s) Development status MGCD265 (Mirati Therapeutics) non–small cell lung cancer (late-stage disease) phase 2 MORAb-003 (Eisai) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 MORAb-009 (Eisai) mesothelioma phase 2 napabucasin (Boston Biomedical) malignant pleural mesothelioma phase 2 NC-6004 (NanoCarrier) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 NGR-TNF (MolMed) mesothelioma (late-stage disease) phase 3 NK012 (Nippon Kayaku) small cell lung cancer phase 2 nintedanib (Vargatef, Boehringer Ingelheim) mesothelioma phase 2 non–small cell lung cancer (combination therapy) phase 3 onalespib (Astex Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 patritumab (Daiichi Sankyo) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 PB272 (Puma Biotechnology) non–small cell lung cancer (HER-2–positive disease) phase 2 PEGPH20 (Halozyme Therapeutics) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 pelareorep (Reolysin, Oncolytics Biotech) non–small cell lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the lung phase 2 pembrolizumab (Keytruda, Merck) non–small cell lung cancer phase 3 PF-06439535 (Pfizer) non–small cell lung cancer phase 3 pictilisib (Genentech/Roche) non–small cell lung cancer (metastatic disease) phase 2 plinabulin (BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer (second-line treatment) phase 2 PT 107 (Pique Therapeutics) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 ramucirumab (Cyramza, Eli Lilly) non–small cell lung cancer phase 3 RG7446 (Genentech/Roche) non–small cell lung cancer (third-line treatment) phase 2 non–small cell lung cancer (second-line combination treatment; first-line treatment) phase 3 rociletinib (Clovis Oncology) non–small cell lung cancer (first- or second-line treatment ofEGFR -mutated disease) phase 2 non–small cell lung cancer (third-line or later treatment for EGFR-mutated disease) phase 3 roniciclib (Bayer HealthCare) small cell lung cancer phase 2 RRx-001 (EpicentRx) non–small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer phase 2 ruxolitinib (Jakafi, Incyte) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 sapacitabine (Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 SAR125844 (Sanofi) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 SC16LD6.5 (Stemcentrx) small cell lung cancer (recurrent disease) phase 2 selumetinib (AstraZeneca) non–small cell lung cancer (second-line treatment of KRAS wild-type disease) phase 2 non–small cell lung cancer (second-line treatment of KRAS-mutant disease) phase 3 seribantumab (MM-121, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 SPI-1620 (Spectrum Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 tarextumab (OncoMed Pharmaceuticals) small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment of extensive-stage disease) phase 2 tepotinib (EMD Serono) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 tergenpumatucel-L (NewLink Genetics) non–small cell lung cancer (advanced or metastatic disease) phase 3 tesevatinib (KD019, Kadmon Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 TG4010 (Transgene) non–small cell lung cancer (advanced disease) phase 3 TH-4000 (Threshold Pharmaceuticals) non–small cell lung cancer (T790M-negative disease) phase 2 trametinib (Mekinist, Novartis) non–small cell lung cancer (combination therapy for BRAF V600-positive disease) phase 2 trebananib (Amgen) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 tremelimumab (MedImmune) mesothelioma phase 3 TSR-011 (TESARO) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 TUSC2 (Genprex) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 veliparib (AbbVie) non–small cell lung cancer phase 3 viagenpumatucel-L (Heat Biologics) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 vintafolide (Endocyte) non–small cell lung cancer phase 2 VS-6063 (Verastem) mesothelioma, non–small cell lung cancer (KRAS-mutant disease) phase 2 X-396 (Xcovery) non–small cell lung cancer (ALK-positive disease) phase 2 Information in this chart was compiled from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, NIH (www.clinicaltrials.gov), corporate websites and the databases of HEMONC TODAY. The publisher or editors do not assume responsibility for any errors or omissions..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Predictive QSAR Tools to Aid in Early Process Development of Monoclonal Antibodies
    Predictive QSAR tools to aid in early process development of monoclonal antibodies John Micael Andreas Karlberg Published work submitted to Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Engineering November 2019 Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the fastest growing markets for diagnostic and therapeutic treatments over the last 30 years with a global sales revenue around $89 billion reported in 2017. A popular framework widely used in pharmaceutical industries for designing manufacturing processes for mAbs is Quality by Design (QbD) due to providing a structured and systematic approach in investigation and screening process parameters that might influence the product quality. However, due to the large number of product quality attributes (CQAs) and process parameters that exist in an mAb process platform, extensive investigation is needed to characterise their impact on the product quality which makes the process development costly and time consuming. There is thus an urgent need for methods and tools that can be used for early risk-based selection of critical product properties and process factors to reduce the number of potential factors that have to be investigated, thereby aiding in speeding up the process development and reduce costs. In this study, a framework for predictive model development based on Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling was developed to link structural features and properties of mAbs to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) retention times and expressed mAb yield from HEK cells. Model development was based on a structured approach for incremental model refinement and evaluation that aided in increasing model performance until becoming acceptable in accordance to the OECD guidelines for QSAR models.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment for Clinical Trial Eligibility Testing in a Molecular Registry (PRAEGNANT) in Germany Hanna Huebner1†, Christian M
    Huebner et al. BMC Cancer (2020) 20:1091 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07546-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Heregulin (HRG) assessment for clinical trial eligibility testing in a molecular registry (PRAEGNANT) in Germany Hanna Huebner1†, Christian M. Kurbacher2†, Geoffrey Kuesters3, Andreas D. Hartkopf4, Michael P. Lux5, Jens Huober6, Bernhard Volz7, Florin-Andrei Taran8, Friedrich Overkamp9, Hans Tesch10, Lothar Häberle1,11, Diana Lüftner12, Markus Wallwiener13, Volkmar Müller14, Matthias W. Beckmann1, Erik Belleville15, Matthias Ruebner1, Michael Untch16, Peter A. Fasching1* , Wolfgang Janni6, Tanja N. Fehm17, Hans-Christian Kolberg18, Diethelm Wallwiener4, Sara Y. Brucker4, Andreas Schneeweiss19 and Johannes Ettl20 Abstract Background: Eligibility criteria are a critical part of clinical trials, as they define the patient population under investigation. Besides certain patient characteristics, clinical trials often include biomarker testing for eligibility. However, patient-identification mostly relies on the trial site itself and is often a time-consuming procedure, which could result in missing out on potentially eligible patients. Pre-selection of those patients using a registry could facilitate the process of eligibility testing and increase the number of identified patients. One aim with the PRAEGN ANT registry (NCT02338167) is to identify patients for therapies based on clinical and molecular data. Here, we report eligibility testing for the SHERBOC trial using the German PRAEGNANT registry. Methods: Heregulin (HRG) has been reported to identify patients with better responses to therapy with the anti- HER3 monoclonal antibody seribantumab (MM-121). The SHERBOC trial investigated adding seribantumab (MM-121) to standard therapy in patients with advanced HER2-negative, hormone receptor–positive (HR-positive) breast cancer and HRG overexpression.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Unveiling the Mechanisms Underlying of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy
    cancers Review Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Unveiling the Mechanisms Underlying of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy Laura Boyero 1 , Amparo Sánchez-Gastaldo 2, Miriam Alonso 2, 1 1,2,3, , 1,2, , José Francisco Noguera-Uclés , Sonia Molina-Pinelo * y and Reyes Bernabé-Caro * y 1 Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS) (HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), 41013 Seville, Spain; [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (J.F.N.-U.) 2 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Seville, Spain; [email protected] (A.S.-G.); [email protected] (M.A.) 3 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.M.-P.); [email protected] (R.B.-C.) These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 16 November 2020; Accepted: 9 December 2020; Published: 11 December 2020 Simple Summary: Immuno-oncology has redefined the treatment of lung cancer, with the ultimate goal being the reactivation of the anti-tumor immune response. This has led to the development of several therapeutic strategies focused in this direction. However, a high percentage of lung cancer patients do not respond to these therapies or their responses are transient. Here, we summarized the impact of immunotherapy on lung cancer patients in the latest clinical trials conducted on this disease. As well as the mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to immunotherapy in this disease. Abstract: After several decades without maintained responses or long-term survival of patients with lung cancer, novel therapies have emerged as a hopeful milestone in this research field.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Immuno-Oncology Medicines in Development
    2017 Immuno-Oncology Medicines in Development Adoptive Cell Therapies Drug Name Organization Indication Development Phase ACTR087 + rituximab Unum Therapeutics B-cell lymphoma Phase I (antibody-coupled T-cell receptor Cambridge, MA www.unumrx.com immunotherapy + rituximab) AFP TCR Adaptimmune liver Phase I (T-cell receptor cell therapy) Philadelphia, PA www.adaptimmune.com anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy Juno Therapeutics multiple myeloma Phase I Seattle, WA www.junotherapeutics.com Memorial Sloan Kettering New York, NY anti-CD19 "armored" CAR-T Juno Therapeutics recurrent/relapsed chronic Phase I cell therapy Seattle, WA lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) www.junotherapeutics.com Memorial Sloan Kettering New York, NY anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy Intrexon B-cell malignancies Phase I Germantown, MD www.dna.com ZIOPHARM Oncology www.ziopharm.com Boston, MA anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy Kite Pharma hematological malignancies Phase I (second generation) Santa Monica, CA www.kitepharma.com National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD Medicines in Development: Immuno-Oncology 1 Adoptive Cell Therapies Drug Name Organization Indication Development Phase anti-CEA CAR-T therapy Sorrento Therapeutics liver metastases Phase I San Diego, CA www.sorrentotherapeutics.com TNK Therapeutics San Diego, CA anti-PSMA CAR-T cell therapy TNK Therapeutics cancer Phase I San Diego, CA www.sorrentotherapeutics.com Sorrento Therapeutics San Diego, CA ATA520 Atara Biotherapeutics multiple myeloma, Phase I (WT1-specific T lymphocyte South San Francisco, CA plasma cell leukemia www.atarabio.com
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of MET Inhibitor Therapies in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review The Role of MET Inhibitor Therapies in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Ramon Andrade De Mello 1,2,3,* , Nathália Moisés Neves 2 , Giovanna Araújo Amaral 2, Estela Gudin Lippo 4, Pedro Castelo-Branco 1, Daniel Humberto Pozza 5 , Carla Chizuru Tajima 6 and Georgios Antoniou 7 1 Algarve Biomedical Centre, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine University of Algarve (DCBM UALG), 8005-139 Faro, Portugal; [email protected] 2 Division of Medical Oncology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04037-004, Brazil; [email protected] (N.M.N.); [email protected] (G.A.A.) 3 Precision Oncology and Health Economics Group (ONCOPRECH), Post-Graduation Program in Medicine, Nine of July University (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01525-000, Brazil 4 School of Biomedical Sciences, Santo Amaro University, São Paulo 01525-000, Brazil; [email protected] 5 Department of Biomedicine & I3S, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), 4200-317 Porto, Portugal; [email protected] 6 Hospital São José & Hospital São Joaquim, A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil; [email protected] 7 Division of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Center, London HA6 2RN, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 May 2020; Accepted: 10 June 2020; Published: 19 June 2020 Abstract: Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the second most common cancer globally. The mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) proto-oncogene can be targeted in NSCLC patients. Methods: We performed a literature search on PubMed in December 2019 for studies on MET inhibitors and NSCLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Atezolizumab Plus Nab-Paclitaxel As First-Line Treatment for Unresectable, Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast
    Articles Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial Peter Schmid*, Hope S Rugo*, Sylvia Adams, Andreas Schneeweiss, Carlos H Barrios, Hiroji Iwata, Véronique Diéras, Volkmar Henschel, Luciana Molinero, Stephen Y Chui, Vidya Maiya, Amreen Husain, Eric P Winer, Sherene Loi, Leisha A Emens, for the IMpassion130 Investigators† Summary Lancet Oncol 2020; 21: 44–59 Background Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy across many different Published Online tumour types. We report the prespecified second interim overall survival analysis of the phase 3 IMpassion130 study November 27, 2019 assessing the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or https://doi.org/10.1016/ metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. S1470-2045(19)30689-8 See Comment page 3 Methods In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial, done in 246 academic centres and *Contributed equally community oncology practices in 41 countries, patients aged 18 years or older, with previously untreated, histologically †Investigators are listed in the documented, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group appendix performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a permuted block method Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, (block size of four) and an interactive voice–web response system. Randomisation was stratified by previous taxane London, UK (Prof P Schmid MD); use, liver metastases, and PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating immune cells.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Tontti Tudiul Lui Hi Ha Unit
    THETWO TONTTI USTUDIUL 20170267753A1 LUI HI HA UNIT ( 19) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication (10 ) Pub. No. : US 2017 /0267753 A1 Ehrenpreis (43 ) Pub . Date : Sep . 21 , 2017 ( 54 ) COMBINATION THERAPY FOR (52 ) U .S . CI. CO - ADMINISTRATION OF MONOCLONAL CPC .. .. CO7K 16 / 241 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 39 / 3955 ANTIBODIES ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31 /4706 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31 / 165 ( 2013 .01 ) ; CO7K 2317 /21 (2013 . 01 ) ; (71 ) Applicant: Eli D Ehrenpreis , Skokie , IL (US ) CO7K 2317/ 24 ( 2013. 01 ) ; A61K 2039/ 505 ( 2013 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Eli D Ehrenpreis, Skokie , IL (US ) (57 ) ABSTRACT Disclosed are methods for enhancing the efficacy of mono (21 ) Appl. No. : 15 /605 ,212 clonal antibody therapy , which entails co - administering a therapeutic monoclonal antibody , or a functional fragment (22 ) Filed : May 25 , 2017 thereof, and an effective amount of colchicine or hydroxy chloroquine , or a combination thereof, to a patient in need Related U . S . Application Data thereof . Also disclosed are methods of prolonging or increasing the time a monoclonal antibody remains in the (63 ) Continuation - in - part of application No . 14 / 947 , 193 , circulation of a patient, which entails co - administering a filed on Nov. 20 , 2015 . therapeutic monoclonal antibody , or a functional fragment ( 60 ) Provisional application No . 62/ 082, 682 , filed on Nov . of the monoclonal antibody , and an effective amount of 21 , 2014 . colchicine or hydroxychloroquine , or a combination thereof, to a patient in need thereof, wherein the time themonoclonal antibody remains in the circulation ( e . g . , blood serum ) of the Publication Classification patient is increased relative to the same regimen of admin (51 ) Int .
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0172932 A1 Peyman (43) Pub
    US 20170172932A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0172932 A1 Peyman (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 22, 2017 (54) EARLY CANCER DETECTION AND A 6LX 39/395 (2006.01) ENHANCED IMMUNOTHERAPY A61R 4I/00 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (71) Applicant: Gholam A. Peyman, Sun City, AZ CPC .......... A61K 9/50 (2013.01); A61K 39/39558 (US) (2013.01); A61K 4I/0052 (2013.01); A61 K 48/00 (2013.01); A61K 35/17 (2013.01); A61 K (72) Inventor: sham A. Peyman, Sun City, AZ 35/15 (2013.01); A61K 2035/124 (2013.01) (21) Appl. No.: 15/143,981 (57) ABSTRACT (22) Filed: May 2, 2016 A method of therapy for a tumor or other pathology by administering a combination of thermotherapy and immu Related U.S. Application Data notherapy optionally combined with gene delivery. The combination therapy beneficially treats the tumor and pre (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 14/976,321, vents tumor recurrence, either locally or at a different site, by filed on Dec. 21, 2015. boosting the patient’s immune response both at the time or original therapy and/or for later therapy. With respect to Publication Classification gene delivery, the inventive method may be used in cancer (51) Int. Cl. therapy, but is not limited to such use; it will be appreciated A 6LX 9/50 (2006.01) that the inventive method may be used for gene delivery in A6 IK 35/5 (2006.01) general. The controlled and precise application of thermal A6 IK 4.8/00 (2006.01) energy enhances gene transfer to any cell, whether the cell A 6LX 35/7 (2006.01) is a neoplastic cell, a pre-neoplastic cell, or a normal cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming MET-Dependent Resistance to Selective RET Inhibition in Patients with RET Fusion–Positive Lung Cancer by Combining Selpercatinib with Crizotinib a C Ezra Y
    Published OnlineFirst October 20, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2278 CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH | RESEARCH BRIEFS: CLINICAL TRIAL BRIEF REPORT Overcoming MET-Dependent Resistance to Selective RET Inhibition in Patients with RET Fusion–Positive Lung Cancer by Combining Selpercatinib with Crizotinib A C Ezra Y. Rosen1, Melissa L. Johnson2, Sarah E. Clifford3, Romel Somwar4, Jennifer F. Kherani5, Jieun Son3, Arrien A. Bertram3, Monika A. Davare6, Eric Gladstone4, Elena V. Ivanova7, Dahlia N. Henry5, Elaine M. Kelley3, Mika Lin3, Marina S.D. Milan3, Binoj C. Nair5, Elizabeth A. Olek5, Jenna E. Scanlon3, Morana Vojnic4, Kevin Ebata5, Jaclyn F. Hechtman4, Bob T. Li1,8, Lynette M. Sholl9, Barry S. Taylor10, Marc Ladanyi4, Pasi A. Janne€ 3, S. Michael Rothenberg5, Alexander Drilon1,8, and Geoffrey R. Oxnard3 ABSTRACT ◥ Purpose: The RET proto-oncogene encodes a receptor tyrosine Results: MET amplification was identified in posttreatment kinase that is activated by gene fusion in 1%–2% of non–small biopsies in 4 patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC treated with cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and rarely in other cancer types. selpercatinib. In at least one case, MET amplification was clearly Selpercatinib is a highly selective RET kinase inhibitor that has evident prior to therapy with selpercatinib. We demonstrate that recently been approved by the FDA in lung and thyroid cancers increased MET expression in RET fusion–positive tumor cells causes with activating RET gene fusions and mutations. Molecular resistance to selpercatinib, and this can be overcome by combining mechanisms of acquired resistance to selpercatinib are poorly selpercatinib with crizotinib. Using SPPs, selpercatinib with crizo- understood.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/176089 Al 3 November 2016 (03.11.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/176089 Al 3 November 2016 (03.11.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, A01N 43/00 (2006.01) A61K 31/33 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (21) International Application Number: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, PCT/US2016/028383 MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (22) International Filing Date: PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, 20 April 2016 (20.04.2016) SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (30) Priority Data: GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, 62/154,426 29 April 2015 (29.04.2015) US TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, (71) Applicant: KARDIATONOS, INC. [US/US]; 4909 DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, Lapeer Road, Metamora, Michigan 48455 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Development of Erbb Family-Targeted Therapies in Osteosarcoma Treatment
    Investigational New Drugs (2019) 37:175–183 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0684-8 REVIEW Advanced development of ErbB family-targeted therapies in osteosarcoma treatment Wei Wang1 & Hua-fu Zhao2 & Teng-fei Yao1 & Hao Gong1 Received: 19 August 2018 /Accepted: 16 October 2018 /Published online: 24 October 2018 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Summary Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary aggressive and malignant bone tumor. Newly diagnostic OS patients benefit from the standard therapy including surgical resection plus radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (MAP chemotherapy: high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin and cisplatin). However, tumor recurrence and metastasis give rise to a sharp decline of the 5-year overall survival rate in OS patients. Little improvement has been made for decades, urging the development of more effective therapeutic approaches. ErbB receptor family including EGFR, HER2, HER3 and HER4, being important to the activation of PI3K/Akt and MAPK signaling pathways, are potential targets for OS treatment. Genetic aberrations (amplification, overexpression, mutation and altered splicing) of ErbB are essential to the growth, apoptosis, motility and metastasis in a variety of cancers. Overexpression of ErbB family is associated with the poor prognosis of cancer patients. A number of monoclonal antibodies or inhibitors specific for ErbB family have entered clinical trials in a range of solid tumors including breast carcinoma, lung carcinoma and sarcoma. Here, we summarized
    [Show full text]
  • And Emerging, Pivotal Signalling Pathways in Metastatic Breast Cancer
    REVIEW British Journal of Cancer (2017) 116, 10–20 | doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.405 Keywords: breast cancer; aromatase inhibitor; mTOR inhibitor; PI3K inhibitor; CDK4/6 inhibitor; anastrozole; letrozole; exemestane Cotargeting of CYP-19 (aromatase) and emerging, pivotal signalling pathways in metastatic breast cancer Stine Daldorff1, Randi Margit Ruud Mathiesen1, Olav Erich Yri1, Hilde Presterud Ødegård1 and Ju¨ rgen Geisler*,1,2 1Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), Lørenskog N-1478, Norway and 2Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Campus AHUS, Oslo N-0313, Norway Aromatase inhibition is one of the cornerstones of modern endocrine therapy of oestrogen receptor-positive (ER þ ) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole, as well as the steroidal aromatase inactivator exemestane, are the preferred drugs and established worldwide in all clinical phases of the disease. However, although many patients suffering from MBC experience an initial stabilisation of their metastatic burden, drug resistance and disease progression occur frequently, following in general only a few months on treatment. Extensive translational research during the past two decades has elucidated the major pathways contributing to endocrine resistance and paved the way for clinical studies investigating the efficacy of novel drug combinations involving aromatase inhibitors and emerging drugable targets like mTOR, PI3K and CDK4/6. The present review summarises the basic research that
    [Show full text]