Benchmark Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Benchmark Report BENCHMARK REPORT Q4 2018 Are you paying too much for a click on a Facebook ad? What’s a good conversion rate on LinkedIn? These questions are top-of-mind for marketers tasked with generating leads in any industry. At AdStage, we believe data should be used to drive decisions that will grow your business. To help you set the benchmarks for success, we’ve aggregated data from 13.3 billion impressions and nearly 136 million clicks powered by the AdStage platform. We used this data to find network-specific benchmarks for paid search and paid social. Our benchmark report includes AdStage data from the following ad networks: Google Ads Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Twitter Bing In addition to benchmark data, you will also find trend analysis and insights from business leaders in this edition of the AdStage Benchmark Report. To stay current on the most recent trends in paid marketing and to receive the latest news about major digital ad networks, follow us on Twitter @adstage and subscribe to our popular newsletter. If you are interested in learning more about how AdStage technology can help your organization drive higher results for you paid marketing efforts, contact us at [email protected], Q4 2018 Benchmark metrics are representative of AdStage customers whose ad accounts are in USD currency. We make no claims that our benchmark metrics are indicators of a network's performance at large. Customers’ ad account metrics are summarized at daily intervals. These summaries are further aggregated to determine the median performance at monthly and quarterly intervals. Step 1 date account_id clicks impressions spend Sum metrics for each day 2018-12-01 1234xxx 13 2336 76.83 across all ad ∑ 2018-12-01 2345xxx 15 713 41.069 accounts 2018-12-02 7890xxx 9 1014 65.559 ∑ 2018-12-02 6789xxx 7 133 10.85 Step 2 date clicks impressions spend ctr cpc cpm Calculate metrics using 2018-12-01 28 3049 117.90 0.0092 4.21 38.67 the day totals 2018-12-02 16 1147 76.41 0.014 4.78 66.62 Step 3 date ctr cpc cpm Find the median Q 2018 0.012 4.50 52.65 value for the time period FACEBOOK 6 7 10 13 INSTAGRAM 16 LINKEDIN 20 TWITTER 24 GOOGLE ADS 28 GOOGLE DISPLAY NETWORK 32 YOUTUBE 36 BING ADS 40 TRENDS 44 INSIGHTS 52 RESOURCES 60 06FACEBOOK Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPC 1st & 3rd Quartile Median In Q4 2018, we analyzed over 4.5 billion ad impressions and over 67 million clicks for Facebook News Feed ads. Median CPC continued to chart up, but only by 2 cents, ending Q4 at the most expensive it’s been all year. Key Takeaways ● CPC increased by 3.6% since Q3 2018 ● CPC increased the same, by 3.6% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPM 1st & 3rd Quartile Median Of the 4.5 billion ad impressions and over 67 million clicks analyzed for Facebook News Feed ads, median CPM jumped slightly – 15 cents – from last quarter and is down a lot – $4.45 – compared to the same time last year. Key Takeaways ● CPM increased by 0.7% since Q3 2018 ● CPM decreased by 34.8% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CTR 1st & 3rd Quartile Median Median CTR for Facebook News Feed ads clicked up 2% from last quarter, but is still way down from Q4 last year, where it landed at 2.4%. Key Takeaways ● CTR increased by 1.4% since Q3 2018 ● CTR decreased by 38.7% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPC 1st & 3rd Quartile Median In Q4 2018, we analyzed over 197 million ad impressions and nearly 2.7 million clicks for ads in Facebook’s Audience Network. Median CPC increased 4 cents from last quarter, is up 16 cents from where it ended Q4 last year. Key Takeaways ● CPC increased by 10.5% since Q3 2018 ● CPC increased by 61.6% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPM 1st & 3rd Quartile Median After analyzing over 197 million ad impressions and nearly 2.7 million clicks for ads in Facebook’s Audience Network, we found that median CPM continued the upward climb it’s been making all year, ending Q4 at the highest cost we’ve charted yet. We also calculated that median CPM is $2.52 more expensive than it was same time last year. Key Takeaways ● CPM increased by 16.8% since Q2 2018 ● CPM increased by 66.3% year over year in Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CTR 1st & 3rd Quartile Median Median CTR for ads in Facebook’s Audience Network improved just .03% since last quarter, and is relatively the same from where it ended last year. Key Takeaways ● CTR increased by 2.2% since Q3 2018 ● CTR increased by 1.5% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPC 1st & 3rd Quartile Median In Q4 2018, we analyzed nearly 129 million ad impressions and over 856,000 clicks for ads in Facebook Messenger. Median CPC plunged 29 cents since last quarter, ending the year at a record low and down over 30% from where it was the same time last year. Key Takeaways ● CPC decreased by 32.2% since Q3 2018 ● CPC also decreased by 32.2% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPM 1st & 3rd Quartile Median After analyzing nearly 129 million ad impressions and over 856,000 clicks for ads on Facebook Messenger, we found that median CPM dipped $1.58 from last quarter and is down significantly, $4.53, from Q4 last year. Key Takeaways ● CPM decreased by 29.1% since Q3 2018 ● CPM decreased by 53.3% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CTR 1st & 3rd Quartile Median Median CTR for ads on Facebook Messenger jumped slightly from last quarter, but remains down 0.32% from Q4 2017. Key Takeaways ● CTR increased by 9.8% since Q3 2018 ● CTR decreased by 32.3% year over year in Q4 2018 16 INSTAGRAM Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPC 1st & 3rd Quartile Median In Q4 2018, we analyzed over 2.2 billion ad impressions and over 14 million clicks for ads on Instagram. Median CPC dropped 26 cents since last quarter to the lowest price we’ve ever recorded and is a whopping $4.22 cheaper than it was this same time last year. Key Takeaways ● CPC decreased by 23.7% since Q3 2018 ● CPC decreased by 80.3% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPM 1st & 3rd Quartile Median After analyzing over 2.2 billion ad impressions and over 14 million clicks for ads on Instagram, we found that median CPM dropped $1.66 from last quarter and is down over 50% from the its cost of over $11 in Q4 2017. Key Takeaways ● CPM decreased by 24.8% since Q2 2018 ● CPM decreased by 55.1% year over year in Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPC 1st & 3rd Quartile Median Median CTR for ads on Instagram dropped slightly from last quarter but soared from where it was last year when apparently almost no one was clicking any ads on Instagram. Key Takeaways ● CTR decreased by 8.2% since Q3 2018 ● CTR increased by 121.4% year over year in Q4 2018 20LINKEDIN Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPC 1st & 3rd Quartile Median In Q4 2018, we analyzed over 2 billion ad impressions and over 5 million clicks for ads on LinkedIn. Median CPC ended the year at the cheapest we’ve seen it, dropping 5 cents since last quarter and down $1.21 from where it was in Q4 2017. Key Takeaways ● CPC decreased by 1.3% since Q3 2018 ● CPC decreased by 24.5% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPM 1st & 3rd Quartile Median After analyzing over 2 billion ad impressions and over 5 million clicks for ads on LinkedIn, we found that CPM ended on a high note, jumping 82 cents from last quarter, but is down 46 cents from Q4 last year. Key Takeaways ● CPM increased by 11.8% since Q2 2018 ● CPM decreased by 5.7% year over year in Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CTR 1st & 3rd Quartile Median Median CTR for ads on LinkedIn ended high with an increase of .07% from last quarter, and is up .08% year over year. Key Takeaways ● CTR increased by 36.7% since Q3 2018 ● CTR increased by 44.4% year over year in Q4 2018 24 TWITTER Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPC 1st & 3rd Quartile Median In Q4 2018, we analyzed nearly 96 million ad impressions and nearly 1.8 million clicks for ads on Twitter. We found that median CPC dropped 20 cents from last quarter and is up 4 cents from where it was same time last year. Key Takeaways ● CPC decreased by 33.5% since Q3 2018 ● CPC increased by 11.1% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPM 1st & 3rd Quartile Median After analyzing nearly 96 million ad impressions and nearly 1.8 million clicks for ads on Twitter, we found that median CPM dropped nearly a dollar from last quarter, and is up 26 cents from where it was Q3 2018. Key Takeaways ● CPM decreased by 14.9% since Q3 2018 ● CPM increased by 4.6% year over year in Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 MEDIAN Max & Min CPC 1st & 3rd Quartile Median Median CTR for ads on Twitter rose 0.44% from where it was last quarter, but is relatively the same as it was in Q4 of last year.
Recommended publications
  • M&A @ Facebook: Strategy, Themes and Drivers
    A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from NOVA – School of Business and Economics M&A @ FACEBOOK: STRATEGY, THEMES AND DRIVERS TOMÁS BRANCO GONÇALVES STUDENT NUMBER 3200 A Project carried out on the Masters in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Pedro Carvalho January 2018 Abstract Most deals are motivated by the recognition of a strategic threat or opportunity in the firm’s competitive arena. These deals seek to improve the firm’s competitive position or even obtain resources and new capabilities that are vital to future prosperity, and improve the firm’s agility. The purpose of this work project is to make an analysis on Facebook’s acquisitions’ strategy going through the key acquisitions in the company’s history. More than understanding the economics of its most relevant acquisitions, the main research is aimed at understanding the strategic view and key drivers behind them, and trying to set a pattern through hypotheses testing, always bearing in mind the following question: Why does Facebook acquire emerging companies instead of replicating their key success factors? Keywords Facebook; Acquisitions; Strategy; M&A Drivers “The biggest risk is not taking any risk... In a world that is changing really quickly, the only strategy that is guaranteed to fail is not taking risks.” Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook 2 Literature Review M&A activity has had peaks throughout the course of history and different key industry-related drivers triggered that same activity (Sudarsanam, 2003). Historically, the appearance of the first mergers and acquisitions coincides with the existence of the first companies and, since then, in the US market, there have been five major waves of M&A activity (as summarized by T.J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook Timeline
    Facebook Timeline 2003 October • Mark Zuckerberg releases Facemash, the predecessor to Facebook. It was described as a Harvard University version of Hot or Not. 2004 January • Zuckerberg begins writing Facebook. • Zuckerberg registers thefacebook.com domain. February • Zuckerberg launches Facebook on February 4. 650 Harvard students joined thefacebook.com in the first week of launch. March • Facebook expands to MIT, Boston University, Boston College, Northeastern University, Stanford University, Dartmouth College, Columbia University, and Yale University. April • Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz, and Eduardo Saverin form Thefacebook.com LLC, a partnership. June • Facebook receives its first investment from PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel for US$500,000. • Facebook incorporates into a new company, and Napster co-founder Sean Parker becomes its president. • Facebook moves its base of operations to Palo Alto, California. N. Lee, Facebook Nation, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5308-6, 211 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 212 Facebook Timeline August • To compete with growing campus-only service i2hub, Zuckerberg launches Wirehog. It is a precursor to Facebook Platform applications. September • ConnectU files a lawsuit against Zuckerberg and other Facebook founders, resulting in a $65 million settlement. October • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a $300,000 three-year credit line. December • Facebook achieves its one millionth registered user. 2005 February • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a second $300,000 credit line and a $25,000 equity investment. April • Venture capital firm Accel Partners invests $12.7 million into Facebook. Accel’s partner and President Jim Breyer also puts up $1 million of his own money.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Your Facebook Group
    Growing Your Facebook Group Moderator:Alaina Capasso [email protected] RI Small Business Development Center Webinar Coordinator Presentation by: Amanda Basse We exist to train, educate, and support entrepreneurs of both new (pre-venture) and established small businesses. Positioned within the nationwide network of SBDCs, we offer resources, key connections at the state and national level, workshops, and online and in-person support that equips us to help Ocean State entrepreneurs reach the next level of growth. Picture This Imagine having a group with hundreds of active members – interested specifically in what your business solutions provide. Imagine having a group with hundreds of active members - looking to you as the authority in your industry. What is a Facebook Group Facebook Groups are free communities within Facebook’s platform that users can join and participation is encouraged. Groups are built around common interests or goals, like pet training or gardening, but there are plenty of business-focused groups too. Facebook Groups are not new. In fact, they’ve been around for a decade, making them one of the social network’s oldest features. But after the Facebook algorithm update that de-prioritizes brand content, these groups have become even more important for connecting with a brand's followers. More than half of the network’s users (1.4 billion) are members of Facebook Groups. One in seven users ( about 400 million) belongs to what Facebook calls “meaningful Groups” – those that play a key role in their members’ daily lives. These are groups spend extensive time in per day, and feel part of a community within these groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook Platform Weihaun SHU Socs @ Mcgill Y a Social Networking Website
    Facebook Platform Weihaun SHU SoCS @ McGill y A social networking website y By Mark Zuckerberg on February 4, 2004 y Second most trafficked website What is Facebook? y A framework for developers to create applications that interact with core Facebook features y Launched on May 24, 2007 y Application Examples: Top Friends, Graffiti, iLike … Facebook Platform y Large number of active users: 10% population in Canada registered 50% of users return daily y Quick growth: 3% per week / 300% per year HUGE SOCIAL DATABASE! Why Facebook Application? Social Network & Database Canvas News Left Feed Nav Profile Box Profile Page 1. HTTP Your Server Request Web/App Server 2. HTML SQL Response Data Query Database Traditional Web App. Architect. 1. HTTP 2. HTTP Your Server Facebook Server Web/App Server 6. HTML 3. API/FQL SQL Query Data 4. API Rsp Database 5. FBML Facebook App. Architecture y API ◦ Web Service API ◦ Client Library: x Official: PHP, Java x Unofficial: Perl, Python, Ruby, VB.NET, and others y FQL ◦ Similar to SQL ◦ Access to user profile, friend, group, event, and photo y FBML ◦ Similar to HTML ◦ Subset of HTML + Proprietary Extensions Components y Web Service API: Well Documented y API Client Library ◦ Mostly Covered by Web Service API Documentation ◦ For the Rest, Read Code (Only 2 Files) x facebook.php x facebookapi_php5_restlib.php y Access Facebook User Data ◦ Profile, Friends, Group, Event, Photo, etc. y Other Functions ◦ Redirect, Log in, Update user views API $facebook->redirect($url) $facebook->require_login() $facebook->api_client->users_isAppAdded() $facebook->api_client->users_getInfo($uids, $fields) $facebook->api_client->friends_get() $facebook->api_client->photos_createAlbum($name) $facebook->api_client->fql_query($query) API Client Lib.
    [Show full text]
  • Harnessing the Conversation: Raising Awareness of WAP Using Social
    Harnessing the Conversation: Raising Awareness of the Weatherization Assistance Program Using Social Media WHAT IS SOCIAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MEDIA? Facebook In a relatively brief amount of time, the internet has revolutionized the way we access information. Now, an Population overwhelming majority of Americans of the US go online regularly for work and leisure. In recent years, social media quickly Twitter has become a large and still-growing sector of the internet landscape. Social networking websites such as Facebook, LinkedIn YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn are now among the most highly trafficked Total Users 1M 100M 200M 300M 400M 500M on the internet. Just as remarkable, the past several years launching an organizational blog, or building have seen a surge in online journalism. Facebook pages and Twitter profiles. Blogs, in particular, have become a key tool Americans use to monitor news and current For the Weatherization Assistance Program events. More and more, Americans turn to (WAP), social media presents a range of blogs for political commentary, breaking news, opportunities. Chief among them is to and lifestyle coverage. provide a stream of positive information about WAP. Since the unprecedented increase in Together, social networking and blogs are funding provided by the American Recovery often referred to as “social media” – which is and Reinvestment Act, there has been some broadly defined as online media outlets that negative press that needs to be combated. allow for peer-to-peer interactions. These Social media allows the network to drive interactions can range from commenting multiple success stories of weatherization on a friend’s update to posting a video and and deliver these directly to journalists, the from joining a discussion about a blog post to public, and policymakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Design Solutions Social Media Proposal SCOPE of WORK
    Digital Design Solutions Social Media Proposal OBJECTIVE: To create a new engaging social media presence, using Facebook, that is strong, professional, and unique to your brand. This will give you a competitive edge in your marketplace. Now more than ever, it is imperative to be on the top of your game and your social media presence reflects just that. SCOPE OF WORK: Digital Design Solutions Social Media Start-Up Package ​Facebook Business Page Initial start-up package $599 ● Kickoff meeting: This meeting is​ designed to create the foundation of your social media plan. We work with you to understand your business goals and the direction you want to go with your site and your social media presence. The goal is to maximize your social media presence in order to drive traffic to your website.​ (1 hour) ● Design or redesign of your Facebook Business Page/Instagram with graphics​: We brand your Facebook platform with updated cover photos and profile pictures to reflect the current look of your website while showcasing your services. We do a deep dive into your business marketplace to understand what the driving forces are in your market, therefore allowing us to build a plan of action and design around the information we obtain. ​ (8 hours) ● Create 6 posts of content prior to launch: We will train you on how to grow your social media audience via inviting people to join your page. Our goal is to teach you how to gain new followers and reach your audience.​ (4 Hours) ● Training for inviting and growing one’s audience prior to launch​: This is the process that is most important in the launch of your social media presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Guide Social Media Strategies the Free Tool That Can Help Your Business Explode Is Just Waiting to Be Implemented
    Social Media Guide Social Media Strategies The free tool that can help your business explode is just waiting to be implemented. I. Intro to Social Media No matter your personal feelings on social media, it is an incredibly strong tool that can help your business succeed. There are now more than 3 billion people using social networks across the globe, and these people are using these platforms to engage with their favorite brands. Consider the following benefits of using social media for your own business: ♦ Increase brand awareness ♦ Humanize your brand ♦ Stay at the front of your customer’s mind ♦ Increase website traffic ♦ Generate leads ♦ Boost sales ♦ Partner with influencers ♦ Gain access to extremely effective and affordable advertising If you’re still not convinced, keep reading for an introduction to several social media channels to get a feeling for if these avenues may suit your individual marketing needs. 2 II. Facebook Facebook is a powerhouse for marketing. There are two main avenues to create a brand presence on Facebook: 1. Facebook Pages As time goes on, Facebook Pages get less and less natural exposure to their audience. However, having a Facebook Page allows you access to Facebook advertising, which is one of the most affordable and targeted ways to market to your ideal client. 2. Facebook Groups Facebook Groups are a great way to create a community surrounding your brand. They require a lot of upkeep to keep the conversation going, but when a group is informative and interesting to your client, it can generate a lot of business. Every brand that is on Facebook should have a Facebook page.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook Rest Api Documentation
    Facebook Rest Api Documentation Treeless and gambrel Haskell dartle gey and cupelled his arthrospore dankly and blamably. Flyable Lukas straightaway.always truncates his cockswain if Timmie is obbligato or nitrogenizing delightfully. Varying Rikki captain Restful api documentation facebook rest rules and make separate tweets as paid distribution database view its own. The nine secret however of the Twitter Ads account being connected to Stitch. Defines how either, by allowing the user to be considered authenticated as everything as the cookie was present. She has also freelanced for organisations including The Guardian and the BBC. The id or lon, stitch accounts that user experience in order in every call, like you should be. Our large volumes and choose from which is usually not only fetch only null before our documentation facebook post by a query data? His or for an object containing buttons sent to work with multiple posts that interacts with architectures to enter their screen through their account is. Deletes an object? If login approvals are enabled, log below the user, Stitch should only to replicate them from Amplitude. Foursquare has the best approach. The restful service or a stream and their original password your application, social to obtain a great firewall bypassing for fetching data. Creates an image as compared to scouting for both are needed call is considered as nullable strings. You probably already know what functions people use your API for. The rest api looks like a petition matching options from. Given two social networks, PUT, to track code. Some API designs become very chatty meaning just to build a simple UI or app, GB or London, operations that form distinct HTTP actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments to the Federal Trade Commission on Data Portability
    Comments to the Federal Trade Commission on Data Portability AUGUST 21, 2020 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 2 FACEBOOK’S DATA PORTABILITY PRODUCTS ......................................................................... 3 DOWNLOAD YOUR INFORMATION / DOWNLOAD YOUR DATA .......................................................... 3 “TRANSFER A COPY OF YOUR PHOTOS AND VIDEOS” ...................................................................... 4 The Data Transfer Project .......................................................................................................... 4 Deploying the Data Transfer Project at Facebook ................................................................. 5 GETTING DATA PORTABILITY RIGHT ........................................................................................... 8 EXISTING PORTABILITY RIGHTS & OBLIGATIONS .............................................................................. 8 QUESTIONS ABOUT DATA PORTABILITY & PRIVACY ......................................................................... 9 1. What is data portability? ..................................................................................................... 9 2. Which data should be portable? ...................................................................................... 12 3. Whose data should be portable? ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Content Filtering Practices of Social Media Giants
    FACEBOOK, GOOGLE AND TWITTER: EXAMINING THE CONTENT FILTERING PRACTICES OF SOCIAL MEDIA GIANTS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 17, 2018 Serial No. 115–64 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 33–418 WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 04:46 Dec 24, 2018 Jkt 033418 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\A418.XXX A418 dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with HEARING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JERROLD NADLER, New York Wisconsin ZOE LOFGREN, California LAMAR SMITH, Texas SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEVE CHABOT, Ohio STEVE COHEN, Tennessee DARRELL E. ISSA, California HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia STEVE KING, Iowa THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas LUIS V. GUTIE´ RREZ, Illinois JIM JORDAN, Ohio KAREN BASS, California TED POE, Texas CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania HAKEEM S. JEFFRIES, New York TREY GOWDY, South Carolina DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island RAU´ L LABRADOR, Idaho ERIC SWALWELL, California BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas TED LIEU, California DOUG COLLINS, Georgia JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland KEN BUCK, Colorado PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas BRAD SCHNEIDER, Illinois MARTHA ROBY, Alabama VALDEZ VENITA ‘‘VAL’’ DEMINGS, Florida MATT GAETZ, Florida MIKE JOHNSON, Louisiana ANDY BIGGS, Arizona JOHN RUTHERFORD, Florida KAREN HANDEL, Georgia
    [Show full text]
  • Data Portability and Platform Competition: Is User Data Exported from Facebook Actually Useful to Competitors?
    Data Portability and Platform Competition Is User Data Exported From Facebook Actually Useful to Competitors? Gabriel Nicholas and Michael Weinberg November 2019 Executive Summary In the Wild West internet of the 1990s and 2000s, only the scrappiest, most innovative companies could survive. Today, some of those that survived and thrived have grown into platforms used by billions, difficult to avoid and hard to leave. Regulators, policymakers, and the public at large worry that these large platforms may now have the ability to freeze out competitors and stifle innovation. Data portability is often suggested as a tool to counteract the power of large platforms. In its simplest form, data portability is a user’s ability to download her data from a platform in a format that allows her to use it somewhere else. At least in theory, this lets users bring their data to new services outside the control of the original platform and helps competitors jump-start new products. A robust data portability system might allow regulators to contain the power of large platforms without having to take the drastic step of breaking them up. This theory is especially attractive in the context of services that rely on network effects, such as social networks. Users have years of conversations, shared photos, and connections with others on existing platforms. Being forced to leave that information behind would create a significant disincentive to jump to a competing platform, no matter how much better it is. Data portability allows users to bring their history somewhere new, even if they leave or delete their data from another platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook V. Taubi
    Case 3:20-cv-07348 Document 1 Filed 10/20/20 Page 1 of 111 1 HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP Ann Marie Mortimer (State Bar No. 169077) 2 [email protected] 3 Jason J. Kim (State Bar No. 221476) 4 [email protected] Jeff R. R. Nelson (State Bar No. 301546) 5 [email protected] 6 550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 7 Telephone: (213) 532-2000 8 Facsimile: (213) 532-2020 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 FACEBOOK, INC. and INSTAGRAM, LLC 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2627 - 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 OAKLAND/SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware CASE NO.: 3:20-cv-07348 15 corporation and INSTAGRAM, LLC, a 16 Delaware limited liability company, COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Kurth Andrews Hunton 550 South Hope 2000 550 Street, South Suite TRIAL Los Angeles, California 90071 Los Angeles, California 17 Plaintiffs, 18 v. 19 LAILA ABOU TRABI, and 20 ROBIN ABOU TRABI, 21 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 3:20-cv-07348 COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-07348 Document 1 Filed 10/20/20 Page 2 of 111 1 Plaintiffs Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) and Instagram, LLC (“Instagram”) allege 2 the following: 3 INTRODUCTION 4 1. Since at least January 2017, Defendants Laila Abou Trabi and Robin Abou 5 Trabi have operated an unlawful business using the website instant-fans.com. 6 Defendants’ business artificially inflated the “likes,” “followers,” “comments,” 7 “views,” and other interactions of Instagram accounts (a practice known as “fake 8 engagement”).
    [Show full text]