Humanities in Minnesota: People, Funding, Ideas
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
.DOCUMENT RESUME ED 175 161 007 658 AUTHOR LeBarron, Suzanne TITLE Humanities in Minnesota: People, Funding, Ideas. A Handbook of .Resources. INSTITUTION Minnegota State Dept. of Education, St. Paul. Library SPONS AGENCY National Endowment tor tae Humanities (iFAH) , Washington, D.C. , PUB DATE Mar 79 NOTE 59p. 1111 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRI:PTCRS Adult Programs: *Humanities: Human Fesources: Informaticn Sources; Program Budgeting; Program Descriptions: *Piogram Pianning: *public Libraries: *Resource Guides IDENTIFIERS *Minnesota ABSTRACT This handbook, produced ny a project ofthie Office of Public Libraries and,Interlibrary Cooperation (OPLIC), provides planning, topic, funding, and,resource information to help public :libraries in Minnegota, in collaboration with other education and cos unity agencies, provides public adultptogramming in the hum1,,,c les; Information wasgathered through statewide planning me s involving public librarians, as_mell aspeople from edu nnal agencies, community Organizations, other'types of libraries, and interested citizens. Telephone surveys were conducted to assess current public library programming for adults, particularly in the humanities, and to intiate a survey to judge circulation of adult humanities materials. Insights gathered from the humanities meetings identify some gaps, in programs and topics, attitudiral and resource barriers, planningconsideratidas, possible evaluation techniques,.and ideas for topics and formats-that could be used for humanities programming. A brief listing of sources is provided to help planners locate people,,traveling programs and exhibits, spec4l cinllections, and fitrther guides to programming. Funding sources are also listed and,outlined. Included is a directory of humanities tesource people in Minnesota representing teachers, writers, and practitioners wilring to assist in plannincu participate in programming, or assist in grantwriting: area library and topic indexes to the directory are pirvided. (CWM) ******************************************************1***************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that-can be made * from the original document. ********************************************************************** isDEPARTMENT OF MEAL TPI EDUCATION & WELIA4E NT ION1. INSTITUTE OF EDU( ATION N N Fs+ . T POINTS Os .,E Ysi :)&1 DPI N q)NS STATIC) )111 NOT NI, I %SAW,. y W I Pfif SENT k); AL NA uNA, NSTI,C TI (1. OW A T,ON POS'F ON Ow PO) v HUMANITIES INMINNESOTA People Funding A HANDBOOK OF RESOURCES EHMIY;ION TO HI- PHODUCA I HIS MA T F ?UAL HAS HE F N GHANTi- D HY Nancy Doyle Bo 1 t I() TIlLf DUI A I)NAI `.-i()(04),1 Ideas TI ( 0.4MA rN H11,, Compiled and Written by Suzanne LeBarron, NEM ProjectDirectdr Office of Public Libraries and InterlibraryCooperation Project funded by the NationalEndowment for the Humanities,A Federal Agency CONTENTS Summary and Recommendations 1 Introduction 3 Project Activities 5 Barriers and Gaps Planning Considerations 9 Evaluatiori 11 Idea Exchange 12 Sources 20 Funding Sources 22 Humanities Resource People in Minnesota 25 Sections: Name Entries 27 Area Index 46 Topic Index 48 SUMMARY This handbook provides information to help public libraries, Ifl collaboration with other educationand community agen- 'cies, provide public programming in the humanities. The introduction andProject Activities define the project and explain the sources for the information included in the handbook. Barriers and Gaps,Planning Considerations and Evaluation are insights and advice gathered from the humanities meetings. The idea Exchangecontains topics and formats that could be used for humenities programming. Sources is a brief listing to help plannerslocate people, traveling programs and ex- hibits, special collections and further guides to programming. Funding Sourcesidentifies some of the agencies most ac- tive in funding the kinds of projects discussed In the handbook. Thefinal section, a directory of Humanities Resource People in Minnesota, lists people willing to assist in planning, participate inprogramming or assist in grantwriting. RECOMMENDATIONS: planning committee was affirmed at the humanities / meetings. People enjoyed the small group discus- Public library humanities programming should occur sions which produced a great number of ideas. at a regional or local level, with information and ad- vice available from OPLIC Further exploration by regions and communitiea to No participants at any of the humanities meetings discover unreached target groups or potential suggested that a statewide program/project be in- audiences is needed. stituted. Local subjects, resources and planning Much of the discussion about needs assessment were of primary Interest. The topics In the Idea Ex- that occurred at the meetings indicated a lack of change have a local focus, e.g. local Natty; local clarity about groups who would be interested In writers. Every follow-up questionnaire indicated humanities programs and groups who are not that localorregionallevel programming was currently exposed to such programming. preferable. Nine respondents included state level Libraries should share information about humanities programming, but never to the exclusion of local programming' they have done. and regional activity. Mary Martin, Traverse des It would be very useful for othqrs to.k now what was Sioux Library System, summarized the spirit of the successful and what wasn't, how It could have been follow-up queationnaires with her statement "I improved and whether use of Ideas/formats ea thinkinvolvementin, humanities programming recommended to others. Sharing could include should take place on all three levels: 1) The local making a videotape of programs available for use levelinvolvement should provide the 'brain- by others. storming power on what types of programs the local community wants, the grass-roots Input. 2) OPLIC SERVICES AVAILABLE: The regional level should provide the funds for Nowell Leitzke at OPLIC can provide the following ser- publicity and coordination of programming among thetr member libraries.3) The statewide level vices: expertise on Clepringhouse for program Ideas submitted as grant should provide consultants with proposals, if they are sent. this information would be programming ideas and methodology." published in the Newsletter. Local planning committees should be formed. Clearinghouse for reporting informatiom on The core of the committee could be some of those humanities programming that was done around the who attended the humanities planning meeting far state, through the Newsletter. the area. The registration list was distributed at Reviewing humanities grants before submitted, if each meeting. Representatives of the target group desired by the initiating library. for which aiparticular program/project is intended General consultation and advice on implementing should also be included The validity of the local programming ideas, MINNESOTA REGIONAL PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEMS January, 1979. ,^7/ ''/////// / / // / / / /// / // / // / / // , ///////'////////, / //// / / , 7 / / / / / / / / / / / ,74' r .. ; . ;;..... ///// / // ///// // /////,/////// ////////4/// /,./ ,/,t,,,, ,,,,, /////, / , / 7,7,7/ //// / / /1/ ,, / / ,7,7 ,,/ 7/ /// /, 4/ / /,, /; ,- /// ////, 7.7.7,;`,/,-,_,(..(...d....,..v/ ,(// 7 / .7 / / 77 /// // 4//////7 /7/ / /I /// / /,// ////// / '7/, _ / / /// /////////://,/ ////// //// , AF.:ie,::E:AD r// /, ////z//,///LI.T.P.A1',Y SYSTEM ,I; / / / // /// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / e' / // // / / /// / / / // / /// / / / / / // e Ull. IP aaaa 11/R`-` IlA e s aR:. , JIo..AL ,,. 8 :.: --lhARY 1 .....at. ef././//://1717/ /1',/, ///// a , .. a a r a a .. ..... / I / allOall110 .. , . , . as a a111111 .:::...1...:t: ...... ... ..... al a 1 , .- / ;7/ .7 / / // , I'l'!'l'i'l 1 11'' ...:: : 2. i .. I: C:.... /// //: //// :// //////// ///' :// 1:// ! . I ,- I 0 Oe I 1 V IKI!:3 H '" !' 1)1111111, ,e/ FAST : CE::;TT AL . ... - - 11111! i'l e, I ! 1 1 f..... 1/. LI 1.i,I,I j : ./. ... ::4.....: ..1.:::...: 11 :......: 1. ,I131ARY ifi ; .t: :1: 1 .. ; % ::., .1 _ e. MU ....: . i :T......... i :t .. 2.. ,,,i,: 44 +--,--4- 4.4-tt-ftt.'"4.0.1 1 4 4.- 4- 4- - ./11.- I ' II, SY 'i'i-::11.1, i ...!' ;V, :74:4e.4::-Vet'et: L LBRARY /, t . et . r. _-. 1 .! Lrtl., ': :.' - i . *.... - : , i I . 4/7, t WESTERN : - - 117E7 LIBRARY 'Tit A , U LIERARY LIBRARY RV ICE ACIENCY .4.th -;-17- DE 7,10UX L I 51?. AP.Y LIBRARY MUM 1, 11Mtil::111111ill 1 *City Libraries participating in Regional Public Library systems. 5 - 2 - INTRODUCTION The Office of Public Libraries and Interlibrary Cooperation (OPLIC) has been involved in a project to encourage public. hbrands, in cooperation with other educational institutions and civic and community organizations, to provide humanities programming for out-of-school adults ("Programming" is used to include all types of prograins, projects and activities.) Funding for the project was provided by the National Endowment for the Humanities. The project ran from June. 1978 through February, 1979. Public programming, rather than research, was the emphaSis of the project and is reflected in the handbook What are "the humanities?" Throughout the project the definition prov.ided by NEH was the working definition: Because human experience has been principally recorded and preserved through books, art works, and other cultural objects, the humanities are often defined in terms of a group of specificocademic disciplines. Thus, the Act which established the Endowment defines the humanities