DOCSLIB.ORG

Book Fall 2006.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Book Fall 2006.Qxd Annals by Glenn C. Altschuler The convictions of Peter Debye At the time of his death in 1966, Peter University of Göttingen, and the Uni- Debye was internationally renowned for versity of Leipzig, Debye (in effect) re- his work on molecular structure, espe- placed Albert Einstein as director of the cially dipole moments (the interaction Kaiser Wilhelm (now Max Planck) Insti- of a collection of charged particles with tute for Physics in Berlin in 1934, serving an electrical ½eld) and the diffraction of until 1939. From 1937–1939, he was also X-rays and electrons in gases. For this president of the German Physical Soci- work, he won the Nobel Prize in Chem- ety. istry in 1936. His name, Debye, is still In 1939, he left his German positions used as the unit of measurement of a and shortly afterwards emigrated to dipole moment. the United States, to join the faculty of Born in Maastricht in 1884, Debye Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, was educated at the Aachen Institute where he taught until 1952. By the time of Technology and Munich University, he retired, he had become a colleague where he received his Ph.D. in physics respected by many on the Cornell cam- in 1908. Following appointments at Zu- pus, and a mentor to a number of young rich University, Utrecht University, the chemists, many of them now prominent in their ½elds. He was also a Foreign Glenn C. Altschuler is the Thomas and Dorothy Honorary Member of the American Litwin Professor of American Studies at Cornell Academy of Arts & Sciences, elected in University. He has published eight books, includ- 1927. ing “Race, Ethnicity, and Class in American So- Given Debye’s reputation, the pub- cial Thought, 1865–1919” (1982), “Rude Re- lication in January 2006 of Einstein in public: Americans and Their Politics in the Nine- Nederland, by science writer Sybe Izaak teenth Century” (with Stuart M. Blumin, 2000), Rispens, came as a shock to academic and “All Shook Up: How Rock ’n’ Roll Changed communities on both sides of the Atlan- America” (2003). He is currently working on tic Ocean. two books: a history of Cornell University, 1945– In Chapter Five of the book–and in present (with Isaac Kramnick), and a history of newspaper articles he wrote to promote the G.I. Bill of Rights (with Stuart M. Blumin). it–Rispens charged that Peter Debye, “one of the greatest Dutch scientists of © 2006 by the American Academy of Arts the twentieth century,” had contributed & Sciences to “Hitler’s most important military re- 96 Dædalus Fall 2006 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/daed.2006.135.4.96 by guest on 01 October 2021 search program.” Acknowledging that “about what people in power expected The con- Debye was not a member of the Nazi of him.”3 Following the Kristallnacht victions of Peter Debye Party, Rispens branded him an “extreme pogrom against German Jews on No- opportunist” and “willing helper of the vember 9 and 10, 1938, he came under regime” whose “hands are dirtier than is pressure to make the German Physical commonly assumed.”1 Society conform to Nazi ideology and Rispens focused much of his attention practices by excluding all non-Aryan on Debye’s activities in Berlin. Support- members. Debye might have resigned ed by a grant from the Rockefeller Foun- from the organization in protest, as the dation (made before the Nazis came to Dutch-born physicist Samuel Goudsmit power), the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute had in 1937. Or protested to the Minis- boasted state-of-the-art research facili- try of Education and Culture. Instead, ties and a staff of ½rst-rate scientists. in December, he wrote to members of According to Rispens, Hermann Goer- the society: “Under the compelling ing, the second most powerful man in overarching circumstances the abiding the Third Reich, made sure Debye got of Reich-German Jews in the German all the resources he needed, especially Physical Society can no longer be main- after physicists Otto Hahn and Fritz tained in the sense of the Nuremberg Strassman discovered that a ‘½ssion’ Laws. In agreement with the Executive bomb could release virtually unlimited Committee I request all members who energy. Debye received a large salary, fall under this regulation to communi- which reached 40,000 marks in 1939, cate to me their withdrawal from the and a house in Berlin-Dahlem, where Society. Heil Hitler!” Debye’s letter may he lived with his German-born wife, well have been “half-hearted,” Rispens Mathilde Alberer, and their two chil- writes, but it was “nonetheless effective dren.2 Aryan cleansing,” with about 10 percent Debye retained his Dutch passport of the society’s members excluded. And throughout the 1930s, Rispens asserts, Debye, Rispens notes, often used the because he believed that with the Na- odious closing salutation, “Heil Hitler!” zis in power a German citizen was less in his of½cial correspondence.4 likely to become a Nobel Laureate. Al- After Germany invaded Poland in Sep- though he declined to formalize his tember 1939, the Nazis brought the Kai- German citizenship, he told physicist ser Wilhelm Institute directly under the Max Planck that he was nonetheless a control of the war ministry. To remain sturdy German nationalist. Debye made as director, Debye was told he must be- repeated inquiries, Rispens emphasizes, come a German citizen. Intent on keep- ing “all options open,” Debye negotiat- ed a leave of absence. Perhaps, Rispens 1 Sybe I. Rispens, Einstein in Nederland: Een In- tellectuelle Biogra½e (Amsterdam: Ambo, 2006), speculates, he thought he might be able 159–184; Sybe I. Rispens, “Nobelprijswinnaar to return in six months, after the Ger- met vuile handen,” Vrij Nederland, January 21, mans conquered Europe with their blitz- 2006. (Translations from the Dutch by Martij- krieg. In any event, the decision hinged na Briggs, Piet Brouwer, and my dear friend Ben Widom, who also commented incisively on this essay.) 3 Rispens, Einstein in Nederland, 175; Rispens, “Nobelprijswinnaar.” 2 Rispens, Einstein in Nederland, 176; Rispens, “Nobelprijswinnaar.” 4 Rispens, Einstein in Nederland, 180. Dædalus Fall 2006 97 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/daed.2006.135.4.96 by guest on 01 October 2021 Annals by “least of all on his aversion to the Nazi for an answer to his repeated question, Glenn C. 7 Altschuler regime.” And although he did not return if and when he can return . ” as director, Debye remained on the pay- Rispens’s case against Debye produced roll of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute until a ½restorm in the Netherlands, which, 1943.5 of course, was especially sensitive to the Debye left Germany in January 1940, behavior of its citizens during World having accepted an invitation to deliver War II. In February, the universities at the Baker Lectures in Chemistry at Cor- Maastricht and Utrecht took action. nell University in Ithaca, New York. Maastricht announced it would no lon- When Einstein learned that Debye was ger award a Peter Debye Prize and asked headed to Cornell, Rispens suggests, “he the sponsor, the Edmond Hustinx Foun- did something he had not done before.” dation, for permission to confer it under Instead of arranging employment, as he a different name. Utrecht deleted De- had for dozens of European refugees, bye’s name from its Institute of Physics Einstein wrote a letter to J. G. Kirkwood, and Chemistry of Nanomaterials and chairman of the chemistry department, Interfaces. and Cornell President Edmund Ezra In press releases, both universities ex- Day, which “opened up Debye’s baptis- plained that the action followed veri½- mal record.” A “reliable source,” Ein- cation of Rispens’s sources (though not stein indicated, had revealed that Debye his judgments) by the prestigious Neth- “maintained close contacts” with the erlands Institute for War Documenta- Nazis. Einstein asked Cornell’s scientists tion. Although the administration at to do “their duty as American citizens.” Maastricht agreed that “there has been In the end, Rispens notes, “Cornell did insuf½cient research to paint a full pic- not act against Debye,” who received his ture of Debye in Nazi Germany,” of½- tenured appointment, became chairman cials were convinced that Debye “in- of the department, and retired in 1952 as suf½ciently resisted the limitations on emeritus professor.6 academic freedom.” His behavior was Nonetheless, even as the German “dif½cult to reconcile with the example armies “trampled over half of Europe,” function connected to the naming of a Rispens concludes, Debye still “longed scienti½c prize.” Ludo Koks, a spokes- for his research institute.” On June 23, man for Utrecht, agreed that Debye 1941, long after the invasion and occu- may have been forced to expel Jews pation of the Netherlands, Debye sent from the German Physical Society. Re- a telegram to the General Consulate in moving his name, he noted, “had quite Berlin, declaring that he was “always an emotional impact,” generating de- ready and willing to take upon myself bate about whether Debye should be again, on the basis of the old conditions, disgraced without more de½nitive in- the directorship of the Kaiser Wilhelm formation. But “we had to make a deci- Institute.” For some reason, the tele- sion . When an institute is named af- gram “remained unnoticed” and Debye ter someone, this person has to have the “waited in vain until the end of the war highest reputation.”8 7 Rispens, Einstein in Nederland, 183–184. 5 Ibid., 181; Rispens, “Nobelprijswinnaar.” 8 Links to the press releases can be found at 6 Rispens, Einstein in Nederland, 182–183; http://www.deye.uu.nl/.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EINSTEIN and NAZI PHYSICS When Science Meets Ideology and Prejudice
    MONOGRAPH Mètode Science Studies Journal, 10 (2020): 147-155. University of Valencia. DOI: 10.7203/metode.10.13472 ISSN: 2174-3487. eISSN: 2174-9221. Submitted: 29/11/2018. Approved: 23/05/2019. EINSTEIN AND NAZI PHYSICS When science meets ideology and prejudice PHILIP BALL In the 1920s and 30s, in a Germany with widespread and growing anti-Semitism, and later with the rise of Nazism, Albert Einstein’s physics faced hostility and was attacked on racial grounds. That assault was orchestrated by two Nobel laureates in physics, who asserted that stereotypical racial features are exhibited in scientific thinking. Their actions show how ideology can infect and inflect science. Reviewing this episode in the current context remains an instructive and cautionary tale. Keywords: Albert Einstein, Nazism, anti-Semitism, science and ideology. It was German society, Einstein said, that revealed from epidemiology and research into disease (the to him his Jewishness. «This discovery was brought connection of smoking to cancer, and of HIV to home to me by non-Jews rather than Jews», he wrote AIDS) to climate change, this idea perhaps should in 1929 (cited in Folsing, 1998, p. 488). come as no surprise. But it is for that very reason that Shortly after the boycott of Jewish businesses at the the hostility Einstein’s physics sometimes encountered start of April 1933, the German Students Association, in Germany in the 1920s and 30s remains an emboldened by Hitler’s rise to total power, declared instructive and cautionary tale. that literature should be cleansed of the «un-German spirit». The result, on 10 May, was a ritualistic ■ AGAINST RELATIVITY burning of tens of thousands of books «marred» by Jewish intellectualism.
    [Show full text]
  • Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: a Study in German Culture
    Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft838nb56t&chunk.id=0&doc.v... Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project A Study in German Culture Paul Lawrence Rose UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1998 The Regents of the University of California In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday ― ix ― ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For hospitality during various phases of work on this book I am grateful to Aryeh Dvoretzky, Director of the Institute of Advanced Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, whose invitation there allowed me to begin work on the book while on sabbatical leave from James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia, in 1983; and to those colleagues whose good offices made it possible for me to resume research on the subject while a visiting professor at York University and the University of Toronto, Canada, in 1990–92. Grants from the College of the Liberal Arts and the Institute for the Arts and Humanistic Studies of The Pennsylvania State University enabled me to complete the research and writing of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: the PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 Vincent Jonathan Houghton, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jon T. Sumida Department of History The subject of this dissertation is the U. S. atomic intelligence effort against both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in the period 1942-1949. Both of these intelligence efforts operated within the framework of an entirely new field of intelligence: scientific intelligence. Because of the atomic bomb, for the first time in history a nation’s scientific resources – the abilities of its scientists, the state of its research institutions and laboratories, its scientific educational system – became a key consideration in assessing a potential national security threat. Considering how successfully the United States conducted the atomic intelligence effort against the Germans in the Second World War, why was the United States Government unable to create an effective atomic intelligence apparatus to monitor Soviet scientific and nuclear capabilities? Put another way, why did the effort against the Soviet Union fail so badly, so completely, in all potential metrics – collection, analysis, and dissemination? In addition, did the general assessment of German and Soviet science lead to particular assumptions about their abilities to produce nuclear weapons? How did this assessment affect American presuppositions regarding the German and Soviet strategic threats? Despite extensive historical work on atomic intelligence, the current historiography has not adequately addressed these questions. THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 By Vincent Jonathan Houghton Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Jon T.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Uranium Club, the Secret Recordings at Farm Hall
    HITLER’S URANIUM CLUB DER FARMHALLER NOBELPREIS-SONG (Melodie: Studio of seiner Reis) Detained since more than half a year Ein jeder weiss, das Unglueck kam Sind Hahn und wir in Farm Hall hier. Infolge splitting von Uran, Und fragt man wer is Schuld daran Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. The real reason nebenbei Die energy macht alles waermer. Ist weil we worked on nuclei. Only die Schweden werden aermer. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Die nuclei waren fuer den Krieg Auf akademisches Geheiss Und fuer den allgemeinen Sieg. Kriegt Deutschland einen Nobel-Preis. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Wie ist das moeglich, fragt man sich, In Oxford Street, da lebt ein Wesen, The story seems wunderlich. Die wird das heut’ mit Thraenen lesen. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Die Feldherrn, Staatschefs, Zeitungsknaben, Es fehlte damals nur ein atom, Ihn everyday im Munde haben. Haett er gesagt: I marry you madam. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Even the sweethearts in the world(s) Dies ist nur unsre-erste Feier, Sie nennen sich jetzt: “Atom-girls.” Ich glaub die Sache wird noch teuer, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virus House      -
    David Irving The Virus House - F FOCAL POINT Copyright © by David Irving Electronic version copyright © by Parforce UK Ltd. All rights reserved No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. Copies may be downloaded from our website for research purposes only. No part of this publication may be commercially reproduced, copied, or transmitted save with written permission in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act (as amended). Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. To Pilar is the son of a Royal Navy commander. Imper- fectly educated at London’s Imperial College of Science & Tech- nology and at University College, he subsequently spent a year in Germany working in a steel mill and perfecting his fluency in the language. In he published The Destruction of Dresden. This became a best-seller in many countries. Among his thirty books (including three in German), the best-known include Hitler’s War; The Trail of the Fox: The Life of Field Marshal Rommel; Accident, the Death of General Sikorski; The Rise and Fall of the Luftwaffe; Göring: a Biography; and Nuremberg, the Last Battle. The second volume of Churchill's War appeared in and he is now completing the third. His works are available as free downloads at www.fpp.co.uk/books. Contents Author’s Introduction ............................. Solstice.......................................................... A Letter to the War Office ........................ The Plutonium Alternative....................... An Error of Consequence ......................... Item Sixteen on a Long Agenda............... Freshman................................................... Vemork Attacked.....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Nuclear Research: Why Didn’T Hitler Get the Bomb? Jim Thomson
    Nazi nuclear research: Why didn’t Hitler get the Bomb? Jim Thomson www.safetyinengineering.com 1 Nazi nuclear research 1. The German project and a brief comparison with the Manhattan and V-weapons projects 2. German project technical achievements and failures 3. Political and organisational factors 4. Motives, ethics, competence and honesty 5. Postscript: The lunatic fringes 2 Jim Thomson www.safetyinengineering.com 1. The German project and a brief comparison with the Manhattan and V-weapons projects 3 Jim Thomson www.safetyinengineering.com Arnold Kramish 1985 The Griffin 1947: April 1943: “Los ALSOS – Samuel Mark Walker 1989 German National Socialism and the Quest Dec 1942: for Nuclear Power 1939–1949 Alamos Primer” Goudsmit Chicago pile UK Government 1992 Farm Hall transcripts declassified lecture notes give (republished 1996) critical complete overview of David Cassidy 1992 Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg bomb project Frisch-Peierls 1944/1945: ALSOS 1956: Thomas Powers 1993 Heisenberg’s War memorandum mission to capture Brighter Than a Mark Walker 1995 Nazi Science: Myth, Truth, and the German March 1940 German researchers , Thousand Suns – Atomic Bomb July/Aug 1945: Einstein letter equipment and data Robert Jungk Paul Lawrence 1998 Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb to Roosevelt Trinity, Little Boy and Rose Project: A Study in German Culture Fat Man. The Smyth 1968: Hans Bethe 2000 ‘The German Uranium Project’, Article in August 1939 Physics Today Report outlines the The Virus House - Jeremy Bernstein 2001
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a I
    Appendix A I Appendix A Professional Institutions and Associations AVA: Aerodynamische Versuchsanstalt (see under --+ KWIS) DFG: Deutsche Forschungs-Gemeinschaft (previously --+ NG) German Scientific Research Association. Full title: Deutsche Gemeinschaft zur Erhaltung und Forderung der Forschung (German Association for the Support and Advancement of Sci­ entific Research). Successor organization to the --+ NG, which was renamed DFG unofficially since about 1929 and officially in 1937. During the terms of its presidents: J. --+ Stark (June 1934-36); R. --+ Mentzel (Nov. 1936-39) and A. --+ Esau (1939-45), the DFG also had a dom­ inant influence on the research policy of the --+ RFR. It was funded by government grants in the millions and smaller contributions by the --+ Stifterverband. Refs.: ~1entzel [1940]' Stark [1943]c, Zierold [1968], Nipperdey & Schmugge [1970]. DGtP: Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir technische Physik German Society of Technical Physics. Founded on June 6, 1919 by Georg Gehlhoff as an alternative to the --+ DPG with a total of 13 local associations and its own journal --+ Zeitschrift fUr technische Physik. Around 1924 the DGtP had approximately 3,000 members, thus somewhat more than the DPG, but membership fell by 1945 to around 1,500. Chairmen: G. Gehlhoff (1920-31); K. --+ Mey (1931-45). Refs.: Gehlhoff et al. [1920]' Ludwig [1974], Richter [1977], Peschel (Ed.) [1991]' chap. 1, Heinicke [1985]' p. 43, Hoffmann & Swinne [1994]. DPG: Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft German Physical Society. Founded in 1899 a national organization at to succeed the Berlin Physical Society, which dates back to 1845. The Society issued regular biweekly proceedings, reports (Berichte) on the same, as well as the journal: Fortschritte der Physik (since 1845).
    [Show full text]
  • 14 the Geochemical News V.M
    14 The Geochemical News V.M. Goldschmidt: The British Connection A Tribute on the th Anniversary of his Death by GP Glasby Department of Geochemistry GZG University of Göttingen Goldschmidtstrasse Göttingen Germany Introduction VM Goldschmidt was born in Zürich on January and died in Oslo on March His scientific life and work have been described in detail by Tilley () Mason () and Wedepohl () Goldschmidt moved to Kristiania (renamed Oslo in ) in when his father Heinrich Jacob Goldschmidt became Professor of Physical Chemistry at the university He attended the university from and was awarded his doctorate in for his work on contact metamorphism of the Kristiania region which subsequently became a classic In he was appointed Professor and Director of the Mineralogical Institute of the university at the age of He continued his work on the magmatic and metamorphic rocks of Southern Norway intermittently until In Goldschmidt was appointed Chairman of the Commission for Raw Materials and Director of the Raw Materials Laboratory in response to shortages of raw materials in Norway under war time conditions (Mason ) In this he proved adept Amongst the projects were investigations of Norwegian ilmenites for the production of titanium dioxide for use in paint manufacture of forsterite a magnesiumrich olivine (MgSiO) of which Norway has abundant supplies as a refractory and of the carbonatite deposits of the Fen District in southern Norway These carbonatite deposits contain high concentrations of niobium which is present as pyrochlore
    [Show full text]
  • The Nazi Atomic Bomb: the Mistaken Assumption That
    THE NAZI ATOMIC BOMB: THE MISTAKEN ASSUMPTION THAT STARTED THE COLD WAR Sam Preston April 5, 2016 “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.” According to his interview for the 1965 documentary The Decision to Drop the Bomb, these are the words, translated from the Bhagavad Gita, that ran through the head of the Manhattan Project’s chief physicist Dr. Robert Oppenheimer upon witnessing the first successful detonation of an atomic warhead. Less than a month later, the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were devastated by similar weapons, and the Second World War officially ended with Japan’s surrender. During the course of its existence, the Manhattan project, the government program that created the atomic bomb, employed over 150,000 people and cost two billion dollars ($26.66 billion in 2016 currency.). It drew upon the knowledge of the most advanced scientists in the world, and was bankrolled by the world’s largest economy. Why was this expenditure of capital and manpower deemed appropriate? The answer is simple: to prevent Nazi Germany from doing it first. Why then, were atomic weapons used after Germany had been defeated and against Japan, a country with no atomic weapons program? It was known during the war that the Japanese were not capable of building atomic weapons; the quality of their physicists and their access to the necessary raw materials were deemed inadequate. The perceived threat came from Germany, whose physics program was the best in the world. After Germany fell, it became apparent that the Allies had not needed to fear a nuclear-armed Nazi state, as the German atomic program had been years away from being able to build and deliver a weapon, and it had at no point during the war been all that high a priority.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA Frank Podosek, Washington University Meetings Announcements 22 GEOCHEMICAL NEWS Johnson R
    NumberT 114,HE January GEOCHEMICAL 2003 NEWS 1 Newsletter of The Geochemical Society in cooperation with The European Association of Geochemistry NUMBER 114 ISSN 0016-7010 JANUARY 2003 Goldschmidt 2002 - Geochemistry at the Top of Europe Newsletter of the Geochemical Society 2 The Geochemical News EAG OFFICERS - 2003 PRESIDENT Terry Seaward, ETH, Zurich PRESIDENT ELECT Bruce Yardley, Leeds, UK OUTGOING PRESIDENT Francis Albarede, Lyon, France TREASURER Catherine Chauvel, Grenoble, France SECRETARY Miark Hodson, Reading, UK EAG COMMITTEE THE GEOCHEMICAL SOCIETY Mira Bar-Matthews, Israel Larryn Diamond, Switzerland Lerome Gaillardet, France Alex Halliday, Switzerland Susan Stipp, Denmark Riccardo Vannucci, Italy The Geochemical Society is a nonprofit scientific society founded to en- Gerhard Worner, Germany Bruce Yardley, UK courage the application of chemistry to the solution of geological and cosmologi- cal problems. Membership is international and diverse in background, encom- passing such fields as organic geochemistry, high- and low-temperature geochem- THE GEOCHEMICAL NEWS istry, petrology, meteoritics, fluid-rock interaction, and isotope geochemistry. The Society produces a Special Publications Series, The Geochemical News (this January 2003 quarterly newsletter), the Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Series (jointly with the Mineralogical Society of America), the journal Geochimica et Editors Cosmochimica Acta (jointly with the Meteoritical Society), and co-publishes the Johnson R. Haas (Dept of Chemistry) electronic journal G3 (jointly with the American Geophysical Union: AGU); grants Carla M. Koretsky (Dept of Geosciences) the V.M. Goldschmidt, F.W. Clarke and Clair C. Patterson Awards, and, jointly Western Michigan University with the European Association of Geochemistry (EAG), the Geochemistry Fel- Kalamazoo, MI 49008 lows title; sponsors the V.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Using History of Physics in Education
    NEWSLETTER A F o r u m o F T h e A m e r i c A n P h y s i c A l s o c i e T y • V o l u m e X • n o . 5 • F A l l 2 0 0 8 Report from the Chair: Using History of Physics in Education By David C. Cassidy, Forum Chair wenty-five years ago, in April 1983, the U.S. Depart- students and even well-educated adults still display a ment of Education published a landmark report titled disturbing lack of scientific literacy, gradual improvement T“A Nation at Risk.” The report sent shock waves rip- has resulted. One of the most important and influential fac- pling through American society, painting a bleak picture tors in this reform has been not a particular initiative but of American education and warning of dire consequences an educational approach. This approach originated most for the nation’s competitiveness. “Our concern goes well directly from one of the leading members of the commis- beyond matters such as industry and commerce,” the sion that produced “A Nation at Risk”—Gerald Holton. In report went on to say. “It also includes the intellectual, a fitting coincidence, almost exactly on the 25th anniversary moral, and spiritual strengths of our people which knit of this report, Holton received the 2008 Abraham Pais Prize together the very fabric of our society.” for the History of Physics during the April 2008 APS meet- Many of the report’s assessments and warnings remain ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Walther Gerlach (1889–1979): Precision Physicist, Educator and Research Organizer, Historian of Science
    Chapter 8 Walther Gerlach (1889–1979): Precision Physicist, Educator and Research Organizer, Historian of Science Josef Georg Huber, Horst Schmidt-Böcking, and Bretislav Friedrich Abstract Walther Gerlach’s numerous contributions to physics include precision measurements related to the black-body radiation (1912–1916) as well as the first- ever quantitative measurement of the radiation pressure (1923), apart from his key role in the epochal Stern-Gerlach experiment (1921–1922). His wide-ranging research programs at the Universities of Tübingen, Frankfurt, and Munich entailed spectroscopy and spectral analysis, the study of the magnetic properties of matter, and radioactivity. An important player in the physics community already in his 20s and in the German academia in his later years, Gerlach was appointed, on Werner Heisenberg’s recommendation, Plenipotentiary for nuclear research for the last six- teen months of the existence of the Third Reich. He supported the effort of the German physicists to achieve a controlled chain reaction in a uranium reactor until the last moments before the effort was halted by the Allied Alsos Mission. The reader can find additional discussion of Gerlach’s role in the supplementary material provided with the online version of the chapter on SpringerLink. After returning from his detention at Farm Hall, he redirected his boundless elan and determination to the reconstruction of German academia. Among his high-ranking appointments in the Federal Republic were the presidency of the University of Munich (1948–1951) and of the Fraunhofer Society (1948–1951) as well as the vice-presidency of the German Science Foun- dation (1949–1961) and the German Physical Society (1956–1957).
    [Show full text]