<<

book reviews Everyday tales of ordinary madness

Why People Believe Weird Things: AP , Superstition, and Other Confusions of our Time by Michael Shermer W. H. Freeman: 1997. Pp. 306. $22.95, £16.95 John C. Marshall Michael Shermer is the -based publisher of Skepticmagazine and director of . He is, according to the foreword by Stephen Jay Gould, “an impor- tant figure in American life”, defending against modern irrationalism and pouring justified scorn on those who take advantage of the gullible. But before we say (a resolutely secular) amen to Shermer’s book, it may be pertinent to cast a sceptical eye on the sceptics. There are many different reasons why people believe weird things and indeed many differ- ent weird things that they believe. Shermer rounds up the usual suspects: the paranor- mal, near-death , alien abduc- tion, Satanism and the ‘recovered memory’ Unconventional behaviour: alien costume contest at a meeting held earlier this year to mark the fiftieth movement, , and . And anniversary of the “Roswell incident”, the alleged crash-landing of a UFO and its unearthly passengers what a mixed bag they are. in New Mexico. Shermer seems to have spent a very bad day at ’s Association for happy to explain that their experiences arise Similarly, he describes as “the Research and Enlightenment. Cayce (a from subclinical temporal lobe epilepsy. But unlikeliest in history” when one would deceased Kentucky ) has already been when they ask how such overactivity pro- have thought it tailor-made for its time and worked over by and James duces those specific experiences, my ums place. Alisa Rosenbaum (aka Ayn Rand) Randi. All Shermer adds is that Cayce’s fol- and ers cause them to shake their heads sadly emigrated from post-revolutionary Lenin- lowers seem quite remarkably incompetent at my credulity. grad to New York. There she wrote a best- at designing and statistically analysing On satanic abuse, in the Middle Ages it seller, , that preached the experiments on extrasensory took the rack and the thumbscrew to make of self-interest and the politics of (ESP). Would it not have been more reveal- people confess that their father drank babies’ unbridled . She gathered around ing to look at some of the many eminently blood. Now, a couple of sessions in an air-con- herself a coterie of handsome young men respectable scientists who are conducting ditioned psychotherapist’s office seems to who somewhat assuaged her vociferous kosher research on guessing those little sym- suffice. What needs explaining here is how we appetites, and were also called on to spread bols on ? have become such wimps. her fame as “the greatest human who On near-death experiences, Shermer Above all, and despite the title of his book, ever lived”. I cannot imagine what Shermer cannot, of course, deny that people report Shermer refuses to engage deeply with why finds “weird” about this everyday story of leaving their bodies, passing through a tun- beliefs are held (or indeed what beliefs, as lust, and power. nel towards the light, and there seeing their opposed to scientific hypotheses, actually By contrast, in the very university in loved ones. But the strangely dichotomous are). Creationists, I would divine, are which I work, there are people who claim question that Shermer then poses — is it lamenting the loss of a monolithic religious that an occult force linking the Earth and the more likely that these experiences are “an as- culture that never existed. If so, no amount of Moon provokes the tides to ebb and flow, and yet-to-be-explained phenomenon of the lecturing from Michael Shermer and that minute creatures too small for the naked brain” or evidence of immortality? — is could reconcile them to eye to see are capable of causing disease. Only irrelevant to any genuinely scientific issue. their fate, and the latter’s attempts to present this week, I heard that pink worms are dining Could not both be true? science as if it were a only make on solid methane at the bottom of the Gulf of An acquaintance of mine, an atheist neu- things worse, on both sides of the divide. Mexico. And that if you send one member roscientist with no in (or desire for) Shermer, at least, appreciates well of a pair of simultaneously created photons immortality, found his near-death experi- enough the conjectural of science to Bellevue and the other to Bernex (two ence spiritually rewarding. Perhaps the real “aimed at building a testable body of knowl- villages near Geneva), each one knows question should be: How can arcane brain edge constantly open to rejection or confir- what the other is doing and itself does states be transcendentally fulfilling? mation”. Yet he seems puzzled by the exis- likewise. Certainly the number of currently unex- tence of such common beliefs as Holocaust To believe in ESP and little green men plained brain states is more than enough to denial and . Surely it is only too seems fairly tame in comparison. keep neuroscientists busy for some time yet. depressingly obvious why some people need John C. Marshall is at the Neuropsychology Unit, For example, when friends tell me that they to believe that the Holocaust never hap- University Department of Clinical Neurology, have been abducted by aliens, taken off to pened, or that people with darker skins than Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, UFOs and there experimented upon, I am their own are intrinsically stupid? Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.

NATURE | VOL 389 | 4 SEPTEMBER 1997 Nature © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 1997 29