sign in sign up
<<
Home , Michael Shermer

WHY DARWIN MATTERS: THE CASE AGAINST PDF, EPUB, EBOOK

Founding Publisher Michael Shermer | 199 pages | 24 Jul 2007 | St Martin's Press | 9780805083064 | English | New York, United States Why Darwin Matters - Wikipedia

Excellent book, well-documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. It's not a long read, and A short, easy-to-read book from the editor of Skeptic Magazine. Shermer discusses the difference between the of and the idea of intelligent design, and explains why the one is taught He is the founding publisher of Skeptic magazine, the editor of Skeptic. He lives in Southern . Michael Shermer. Science is currently absent from the field of . Shelves: , , biology. Why Darwin Matters , by well-known skeptic author Michael Shermer, is an excellent introduction to the science, and lack thereof, behind the "controversy" between evolution and "Intelligent Design" ID that has jeopardized science education in the USA. Those who are seeking an in-depth criticism of current ID arguments, however, will find this book lacking in particulars. Shermer begins with a concise survey of what evolution really is, and masterfully sets the historical stage in wh Why Darwin Matters , by well- known skeptic author Michael Shermer, is an excellent introduction to the science, and lack thereof, behind the "controversy" between evolution and "Intelligent Design" ID creationism that has jeopardized science education in the USA. Shermer begins with a concise survey of what evolution really is, and masterfully sets the historical stage in which evolution is pitted against . He accurately pinpoints the major logical fallacies characteristic of ID creationists' arguments, and briefly surveys the "best" arguments put forth in favor of ID, touching on the flaws in each. Finally, he reveals some disturbing facts about the true motives of the ID movement. All in all, the book is beautifully organized and extremely well written. Nonetheless, it is not until the Coda—after the Epilogue—that Shermer drives home the central argument against ID, that it is scientifically vacuous: "The problem with the explanations of Intelligent Design is that there is nothing we can do with supernatural explanations. They lead to no data collection, no testable hypotheses, no quantifiable theories: therefore, no science. To the average American, that's why Darwin matters. The battle-hardened scientist or science teacher already embroiled in the "controversy" will learn little from Why Darwin Matters —but will still enjoy reading it. And for any up-and-coming defender of science, this book makes a perfect springboard from which to explore the politico-religious phenomenon of ID in greater depth. Jul 12, Corinne Edwards rated it really liked it Shelves: , the-nook-book-club , non-fiction , religion , science , evolution. I have come to the conclusion that the subtitle should actually be the title of this book. Sometimes I felt like I was in court and Intelligent Design was the defendant - Shermer's purpose was to lay down the facts regarding evolution is such a way as to explain why Intelligent Design is a scientific impossibility. Or, the fact that, in his opinion, Intelligent Design is not scientific at all. I rarely read books that are so thoroughly scientific. I'm not going to lie: sometimes I had to skim ove I have come to the conclusion that the subtitle should actually be the title of this book. I'm not going to lie: sometimes I had to skim over the most in-depth parts about RNA and mitochondria and the more nitty gritty aspects of evolutionary theory. But there was much that was interesting about studies that have been done and anecdotal stories about evolutionary science - these were very accessibly written. I feel like I now have a sense for what both sides of the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design debate assert and that I'm more able to have an informed discussion about the topic. He goes into this in depth, obviously, as he separates the theory of evolution from theological discourse. I appreciated that he acknowledged that yes, it is totally possible to be reconciled to both - but I also felt, and this bothered me, that he tended to be condescending regarding those who DID believe in Intelligent Design. Actually, the whole tone of the book felt a bit condescending to me - and even though he presents an excellent case and I don't even disagree with his point - I just wish he'd been less patronizing. This book got me thinking, that's for sure. I can't pretend this is the perfect summer beach read or that everyone will want to pick it up, but it helped me use my brain for a while, got me to sort through how I feel about a multitude of issues and for the most part, it did entertain me. So, take from that what you will. Sep 06, Gendou rated it it was amazing Shelves: science , biology , non-fiction , skepticism , . This book doesn't go into the medical, biological, and zoological importance of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. It exposes the "Intelligent Design" movement as nothing more than non-scientific Creationism dressed up in a bed sheet like a Scooby-Doo ghost. View 2 comments. Jun 23, Dyary Abubakr rated it liked it. Evolution matters because science matters. Science matters because it is the preeminent story of our age, an epic saga about who we are, where we came from, and where we are going. Jun 24, Book rated it really liked it Shelves: evolution. It also provides lucid arguments in support of evolution. Positives: 1. One of the main reasons Michael Shermer is a very good author is because he understands his audience. He understands that this book is intended for the masses and he succeeds at providing the masses what it needs. A clear understanding of Why Darwin in fact matters and the facts about evolution, in an accessible manner. Shermer is also a very likeable and intelligent man and this comes through in his writing style which is straight forward, easy to follow yet profound. It's the perfect gift for someone who wants to know the facts from fiction regarding evolution and ID. It clearly shows why ID is not science by going over their arguments. Explains to the layman what constitutes scientific work. The concept of convergence of independent lines of evidence leads to the very compelling and single conclusion, that life evolved. Love the use of lists throughout the book, such as: vestigial structures, reasons why people resist the truth of evolutionary theory, seven strongest predictors of belief in God, reasons to engage in the debate between evolution and ID, arguments for ID, six cosmic numbers of the , ten "icons" of evolution, 7. Shermer knows how to get to the point and does a wonderful job with lists and other interesting tidbits. So much is covered succinctly in less than pages. A good section on science under attack and a discussion on important court cases. The truth behind the people behind the ID movement and their ultimate agenda. An interesting chapter on what the real unsolved problems in evolution truly are. A truly enjoyable introduction to evolution written in an accessible manner for all levels to enjoy. Extensive notes and the links work well. Negatives: 1. Not as technical as other books on the topic but provides great references for those who want to dig deeper. Table of contents work fine but you can't access it from the menu. I think the weakest part of the book is when Mr. Shermer tries to extend an olive branch of sorts to believers "Evolution makes for good theology. You can't allow faith to get in the way of the facts, no matter what they are. In summary, this book is another great addition to my evolutionary collection. Jan 11, John rated it it was amazing Shelves: science , books-i-own. In "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design" Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, reviews succinctly both the overwhelming evidence in support of contemporary evolutionary theory and the pseudoscientific religious nonsense known as Intelligent Design, and then, discusses "the real, unsolved problems in evolution". Shermer, for example, has ample space to describe briefly Ernst Mayr's theory of allopatric speciation, and its relationship to punctuated equilibrium, the e In "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design" Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, reviews succinctly both the overwhelming evidence in support of contemporary evolutionary theory and the pseudoscientific religious nonsense known as Intelligent Design, and then, discusses "the real, unsolved problems in evolution". Shermer, for example, has ample space to describe briefly Ernst Mayr's theory of allopatric speciation, and its relationship to punctuated equilibrium, the evolutionary paleontological theory developed by American invertebrate paleontologists Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould. But he also devotes ample space to dissecting Intelligent Design concepts like William Dembski's "Law of Conservation of Information", noting its irrelevance to both current mathematical information theory and the transfer and accretion of information - via DNA - in living biological systems. He offers an elegant overview of the origins and history of the so-called "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Debate", devoting ample time to the existence of the infamous "Wedge Document" and the trial proceedings of the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial and, of course, the harsh verdict rendered by Federal Judge John E. Shermer's terse tome is noteworthy for several reasons. First, he recognizes the necessity for engaging Intelligent Design advocates like Michael Behe and William Dembski, among others, in debates between themselves and knowledgeable critics on behalf of genuine science like Shermer, if only to educate public audiences on the of scientific inquiry, the ample facts obtained from genuine scientific research, and the disingenuous lies, half-truths, and omissions promoted zealously by Intelligent Design advocates. Second, he makes a most persuasive case explaining why evolution ought to be accepted by conservatives, as the agent ultimately responsible for the origins of morality in humans, and that "" could be seen as a biological application of Adam Smith's concept of laissez faire free market economics. Last, but not least, Shermer contends that science should be viewed as being complementary towards spirituality, by engendering a "sense of awe" in viewing, for example, distant galaxies; therefore evolution can and should be seen in this very light. For these reasons, Shermer's terse tome deserves a place on the bookshelves of as wide a readership as possible. Reposted from my Amazon review Aug 04, Pankaj Singh rated it it was amazing. Shermer is extremely respectful towards the creationists, but still firm enough when demonstrating how wrong they are. The longest chapter in this book gives space to the ID arguments. Shermer describes in detail what ID proponents claim, and then tears each argument down beautifully. Of course, a book on a topic like this is bound to attract creationists who just love one starring. The funniest reason I read for disliking this book was " Shermer quotes himself". Well, if you have published tons of books and papers, you have the right to quote yourself. I just feel sorry for all the people who dismiss evolution before understanding it. As Shermer points out, by claiming God conjured humans like a cheap magic trick, one takes away credit from God. Creationism and intelligent design are not just terrible science, they are bad theology. Excellent book, well-documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. It's not a long read, and covers much material previously published, but I like that Shermer is willing to engage the purveyors of non-science, for while I agree with Dawkins et al that engaging in debate legitimizes what is absurd, someone needs to cogently demonstrate such absurdity. He does a good job explaining why scien Excellent book, well-documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. He does a good job explaining why science cannot disprove religion but also how religion cannot conscript science to support its aims, for science easily disproves such attempts if that door is opened.. Jul 10, Tyler Malone rated it really liked it. A book to give to a believing Baptist. It's easy to read and the ideas are stripped down. There are a few passages that attempt to bridge real science with those who believe that the Bible's creation story is factual. I choose to merit this book for what it tries to do -- reach the ignorant, not what I think it should be. Jul 24, Byron rated it it was amazing. Excellent overview of the how evolution is among the most tested and observed hypothesis in and how it dovetails or not with the various theories of creationism and intelligent design. I have read other books by Shermer who write technical subjects with interest and clarity. This book isn't necessarily tremendously original, but it IS pretty good in that good arguments are made, facts are laid out, idiocies are exposed -- again -- and thus it's one more nail in the coffin of religion and most especially Abrahaminic theism, particularly as practised by most Christians and especially evangelicals and fundies in America. Having grown up in that tradition, being steeped in it, having played leadership roles, been a missionary, was Billy Graham's youngest counselor, we This book isn't necessarily tremendously original, but it IS pretty good in that good arguments are made, facts are laid out, idiocies are exposed -- again -- and thus it's one more nail in the coffin of religion and most especially Abrahaminic theism, particularly as practised by most Christians and especially evangelicals and fundies in America. Having grown up in that tradition, being steeped in it, having played leadership roles, been a missionary, was Billy Graham's youngest counselor, went to a Presbyterian college, etc. And on and on. I don't need to write a book; plenty enough have already been written. So, the concept of "intelligent design" is a hilarious fraud masquerading as "science," although virtually no actual, real scientists acknowledge it as legitimate since it doesn't stand up to the , among many other reasons, and thus back to Darwin. Again, not the first or best book on the subject, but not bad and again, just another nail in the coffin of a failed and inhumane prehistoric myth. Jul 14, Winston Jen rated it it was amazing. Why Facts Matter Why Darwin Matters is an immensely readable book about a very complicated and crucial subject: evolution. Beginning with Shermer's account of an archaeological dig for fossils and a description of how the Earth is most certainly NOT fined tuned for life. You are a profound thinker and a greatly admired man. I look forward to more work from you in the future. This book is a masterpiece. I will go further: Dr. Shermer is a pride of the human kind. However, sometimes I believe he takes too soft a stance against religious positions. Michael, Rare is the energy you bring to refuting the nonsensical arguments of creationists. Like many of us you threw off the shroud of stifling religious indoctrination to pursue a quest for scientific understanding and discovery. However, unlike too many of us, your writings challenge others to step out from under unreasonable faith into the fresh air of intellectual freedom. Reasoning evolution that liberates from superstition happens. Spectacular and refreshing work! Most many? I have to wonder what it is that makes all of us without exception need some sort of god. Randi taunts others with his publicity stunt challenge but runs from the Perron challenge. When Bill Perron offered to show proof of the cowardly actions to Shermer poor Michael instead of being a true skeptic and looking at the proof Perron offered he yelled into the voice mail of Perron, doing his schoolgirl imitation almost crying for Perron to just go away. Now how is Michael any different than the followers of another belief or false guru? I just noticed that on my web site address posted in my previous posting that instead of a dot com I hit the wrong key and it became a comma con. Mia copa, mia copa, mia maxima copa. Please make the correction if you truly desire to see how wonderful I truly am. There are even videos for your amusement. Also I would like to take this opportunity to thank Shermer for having this posting forum where those with a different perspective can voice their views. Why Darwin Matters » Michael Shermer

In Why Darwin Matters , historian of science and bestselling author Michael Shermer defuses these fears by examining what evolution really is, how we know it happened, and how to test it. Supreme Court case of , to the ongoing trials today, demonstrating clearly how and why creationism and Intelligent Design theory are not science. Shermer also builds a powerful case for evolution as the scientific theory that most closely parallels the Christian model of human nature and the conservative model of free market economics. The most common reason people give for why they believe in God is the good design of the world and the life in it. The question is: who or what is the designer? Why Darwin Matters examines the difference between supernatural design creationism v. Also their beliefs and ceremonies were all for nothing. Your book is simply a breathtaking piece of brilliance. I have been following your work for several years, as well as being a member of the Skeptic Society. You are a profound thinker and a greatly admired man. I look forward to more work from you in the future. This book is a masterpiece. I will go further: Dr. Shermer is a pride of the human kind. However, sometimes I believe he takes too soft a stance against religious positions. Michael, Rare is the energy you bring to refuting the nonsensical arguments of creationists. Like many of us you threw off the shroud of stifling religious indoctrination to pursue a quest for scientific understanding and discovery. However, unlike too many of us, your writings challenge others to step out from under unreasonable faith into the fresh air of intellectual freedom. Reasoning evolution that liberates from superstition happens. Spectacular and refreshing work! Most many? I have to wonder what it is that makes all of us without exception need some sort of god. Randi taunts others with his publicity stunt challenge but runs from the Perron challenge. When Bill Perron offered to show proof of the cowardly actions to Shermer poor Michael instead of being a true skeptic and looking at the proof Perron offered he yelled into the voice mail of Perron, doing his schoolgirl imitation almost crying for Perron to just go away. Now how is Michael any different than the followers of another belief or false guru? I just noticed that on my web site address posted in my previous posting that instead of a dot com I hit the wrong key and it became a comma con. Mia copa, mia copa, mia maxima copa. Please make the correction if you truly desire to see how wonderful I truly am. There are even videos for your amusement. Also I would like to take this opportunity to thank Shermer for having this posting forum where those with a different perspective can voice their views. Is Bill Perron for real? Bill Perron is for real, but Glen Coulton may not be, he obviously thinks Western Empire Latin is the only language to express sincerity, never heard of Eastern Empire Latin? I would not buy the argument that science and religion can coexist for the same topic. Science has made it very clear that the answer to our best of knowledge is Evolution by Natural Selection along with Artificial Selection. What about stars? In this case, I would have to choose evidence over faith. Science does not deal with all the things which religion deals with. Morality, for example is something which we humans accept as a part of the culture which has very little to do with science. Science is currently absent from the field of morality. Shelves: skepticism , , biology. Why Darwin Matters , by well-known skeptic author Michael Shermer, is an excellent introduction to the science, and lack thereof, behind the "controversy" between evolution and "Intelligent Design" ID creationism that has jeopardized science education in the USA. Those who are seeking an in-depth criticism of current ID arguments, however, will find this book lacking in particulars. Shermer begins with a concise survey of what evolution really is, and masterfully sets the historical stage in wh Why Darwin Matters , by well-known skeptic author Michael Shermer, is an excellent introduction to the science, and lack thereof, behind the "controversy" between evolution and "Intelligent Design" ID creationism that has jeopardized science education in the USA. Shermer begins with a concise survey of what evolution really is, and masterfully sets the historical stage in which evolution is pitted against Christian fundamentalism. He accurately pinpoints the major logical fallacies characteristic of ID creationists' arguments, and briefly surveys the "best" arguments put forth in favor of ID, touching on the flaws in each. Finally, he reveals some disturbing facts about the true motives of the ID movement. All in all, the book is beautifully organized and extremely well written. Nonetheless, it is not until the Coda—after the Epilogue—that Shermer drives home the central argument against ID, that it is scientifically vacuous: "The problem with the supernatural explanations of Intelligent Design is that there is nothing we can do with supernatural explanations. They lead to no data collection, no testable hypotheses, no quantifiable theories: therefore, no science. To the average American, that's why Darwin matters. The battle-hardened scientist or science teacher already embroiled in the "controversy" will learn little from Why Darwin Matters —but will still enjoy reading it. And for any up-and-coming defender of science, this book makes a perfect springboard from which to explore the politico-religious phenomenon of ID in greater depth. Jul 12, Corinne Edwards rated it really liked it Shelves: , the-nook-book-club , non-fiction , religion , science , evolution. I have come to the conclusion that the subtitle should actually be the title of this book. Sometimes I felt like I was in court and Intelligent Design was the defendant - Shermer's purpose was to lay down the facts regarding evolution is such a way as to explain why Intelligent Design is a scientific impossibility. Or, the fact that, in his opinion, Intelligent Design is not scientific at all. I rarely read books that are so thoroughly scientific. I'm not going to lie: sometimes I had to skim ove I have come to the conclusion that the subtitle should actually be the title of this book. I'm not going to lie: sometimes I had to skim over the most in-depth parts about RNA and mitochondria and the more nitty gritty aspects of evolutionary theory. But there was much that was interesting about studies that have been done and anecdotal stories about evolutionary science - these were very accessibly written. I feel like I now have a sense for what both sides of the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design debate assert and that I'm more able to have an informed discussion about the topic. He goes into this in depth, obviously, as he separates the theory of evolution from theological discourse. I appreciated that he acknowledged that yes, it is totally possible to be reconciled to both - but I also felt, and this bothered me, that he tended to be condescending regarding those who DID believe in Intelligent Design. Actually, the whole tone of the book felt a bit condescending to me - and even though he presents an excellent case and I don't even disagree with his point - I just wish he'd been less patronizing. This book got me thinking, that's for sure. I can't pretend this is the perfect summer beach read or that everyone will want to pick it up, but it helped me use my brain for a while, got me to sort through how I feel about a multitude of issues and for the most part, it did entertain me. So, take from that what you will. Sep 06, Gendou rated it it was amazing Shelves: science , biology , non-fiction , skepticism , atheism. This book doesn't go into the medical, biological, and zoological importance of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. It exposes the "Intelligent Design" movement as nothing more than non-scientific Creationism dressed up in a bed sheet like a Scooby-Doo ghost. View 2 comments. Jun 23, Dyary Abubakr rated it liked it. Evolution matters because science matters. Science matters because it is the preeminent story of our age, an epic saga about who we are, where we came from, and where we are going. Jun 24, Book rated it really liked it Shelves: evolution. It also provides lucid arguments in support of evolution. Positives: 1. One of the main reasons Michael Shermer is a very good author is because he understands his audience. He understands that this book is intended for the masses and he succeeds at providing the masses what it needs. A clear understanding of Why Darwin in fact matters and the facts about evolution, in an accessible manner. Shermer is also a very likeable and intelligent man and this comes through in his writing style which is straight forward, easy to follow yet profound. It's the perfect gift for someone who wants to know the facts from fiction regarding evolution and ID. It clearly shows why ID is not science by going over their arguments. Explains to the layman what constitutes scientific work. The concept of convergence of independent lines of evidence leads to the very compelling and single conclusion, that life evolved. Love the use of lists throughout the book, such as: vestigial structures, reasons why people resist the truth of evolutionary theory, seven strongest predictors of belief in God, reasons to engage in the debate between evolution and ID, arguments for ID, six cosmic numbers of the Anthropic Principle, ten "icons" of evolution, 7. Shermer knows how to get to the point and does a wonderful job with lists and other interesting tidbits. So much is covered succinctly in less than pages. A good section on science under attack and a discussion on important court cases. The truth behind the people behind the ID movement and their ultimate agenda. An interesting chapter on what the real unsolved problems in evolution truly are. A truly enjoyable introduction to evolution written in an accessible manner for all levels to enjoy. Extensive notes and the links work well. Negatives: 1. Not as technical as other books on the topic but provides great references for those who want to dig deeper. Table of contents work fine but you can't access it from the menu. I think the weakest part of the book is when Mr. Shermer tries to extend an olive branch of sorts to believers "Evolution makes for good theology. You can't allow faith to get in the way of the facts, no matter what they are. In summary, this book is another great addition to my evolutionary collection. Jan 11, John rated it it was amazing Shelves: science , books-i-own. In "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design" Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, reviews succinctly both the overwhelming evidence in support of contemporary evolutionary theory and the pseudoscientific religious nonsense known as Intelligent Design, and then, discusses "the real, unsolved problems in evolution". Shermer, for example, has ample space to describe briefly Ernst Mayr's theory of allopatric speciation, and its relationship to punctuated equilibrium, the e In "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design" Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, reviews succinctly both the overwhelming evidence in support of contemporary evolutionary theory and the pseudoscientific religious nonsense known as Intelligent Design, and then, discusses "the real, unsolved problems in evolution". Shermer, for example, has ample space to describe briefly Ernst Mayr's theory of allopatric speciation, and its relationship to punctuated equilibrium, the evolutionary paleontological theory developed by American invertebrate paleontologists Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould. But he also devotes ample space to dissecting Intelligent Design concepts like William Dembski's "Law of Conservation of Information", noting its irrelevance to both current mathematical information theory and the transfer and accretion of information - via DNA - in living biological systems. He offers an elegant overview of the origins and history of the so-called "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Debate", devoting ample time to the existence of the infamous "Wedge Document" and the trial proceedings of the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial and, of course, the harsh verdict rendered by Federal Judge John E. Shermer's terse tome is noteworthy for several reasons. First, he recognizes the necessity for engaging Intelligent Design advocates like Michael Behe and William Dembski, among others, in debates between themselves and knowledgeable critics on behalf of genuine science like Shermer, if only to educate public audiences on the nature of scientific inquiry, the ample facts obtained from genuine scientific research, and the disingenuous lies, half-truths, and omissions promoted zealously by Intelligent Design advocates. Second, he makes a most persuasive case explaining why evolution ought to be accepted by conservatives, as the agent ultimately responsible for the origins of morality in humans, and that "survival of the fittest" could be seen as a biological application of Adam Smith's concept of laissez faire free market economics. Last, but not least, Shermer contends that science should be viewed as being complementary towards spirituality, by engendering a "sense of awe" in viewing, for example, distant galaxies; therefore evolution can and should be seen in this very light. For these reasons, Shermer's terse tome deserves a place on the bookshelves of as wide a readership as possible. Reposted from my Amazon review Aug 04, Pankaj Singh rated it it was amazing. Shermer is extremely respectful towards the creationists, but still firm enough when demonstrating how wrong they are. The longest chapter in this book gives space to the ID arguments. Shermer describes in detail what ID proponents claim, and then tears each argument down beautifully. Of course, a book on a topic like this is bound to attract creationists who just love one starring. The funniest reason I read for disliking this book was " Shermer quotes himself". Well, if you have published tons of books and papers, you have the right to quote yourself. I just feel sorry for all the people who dismiss evolution before understanding it. As Shermer points out, by claiming God conjured humans like a cheap magic trick, one takes away credit from God. Creationism and intelligent design are not just terrible science, they are bad theology. Excellent book, well- documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. It's not a long read, and covers much material previously published, but I like that Shermer is willing to engage the purveyors of non-science, for while I agree with Dawkins et al that engaging in debate legitimizes what is absurd, someone needs to cogently demonstrate such absurdity. He does a good job explaining why scien Excellent book, well-documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. He does a good job explaining why science cannot disprove religion but also how religion cannot conscript science to support its aims, for science easily disproves such attempts if that door is opened.. Jul 10, Tyler Malone rated it really liked it. A book to give to a Bible believing Baptist. It's easy to read and the ideas are stripped down. There are a few passages that attempt to bridge real science with those who believe that the Bible's creation story is factual. I choose to merit this book for what it tries to do -- reach the ignorant, not what I think it should be. Jul 24, Byron rated it it was amazing. Excellent overview of the how evolution is among the most tested and observed hypothesis in natural science and how it dovetails or not with the various theories of creationism and intelligent design. I have read other books by Shermer who write technical subjects with interest and clarity. This book isn't necessarily tremendously original, but it IS pretty good in that good arguments are made, facts are laid out, idiocies are exposed -- again -- and thus it's one more nail in the coffin of religion and most especially Abrahaminic theism, particularly as practised by most Christians and especially evangelicals and fundies in America. Having grown up in that tradition, being steeped in it, having played leadership roles, been a missionary, was Billy Graham's youngest counselor, we This book isn't necessarily tremendously original, but it IS pretty good in that good arguments are made, facts are laid out, idiocies are exposed -- again -- and thus it's one more nail in the coffin of religion and most especially Abrahaminic theism, particularly as practised by most Christians and especially evangelicals and fundies in America. Having grown up in that tradition, being steeped in it, having played leadership roles, been a missionary, was Billy Graham's youngest counselor, went to a Presbyterian college, etc. And on and on. I don't need to write a book; plenty enough have already been written. So, the concept of "intelligent design" is a hilarious fraud masquerading as "science," although virtually no actual, real scientists acknowledge it as legitimate since it doesn't stand up to the scientific method, among many other reasons, and thus back to Darwin. Again, not the first or best book on the subject, but not bad and again, just another nail in the coffin of a failed and inhumane prehistoric myth. Jul 14, Winston Jen rated it it was amazing. Why Facts Matter Why Darwin Matters is an immensely readable book about a very complicated and crucial subject: evolution. Beginning with Shermer's account of an archaeological dig for fossils and a description of how the Earth is most certainly NOT fined tuned for life. Even if we disregard the array of predators that would sooner make a meal of us than be our companions in life, the environment itself is hostile to human breeding, let alone flourishing. Unintelligent design is also rampant and Why Facts Matter Why Darwin Matters is an immensely readable book about a very complicated and crucial subject: evolution. Unintelligent design is also rampant and obvious even after a cursory analysis. The appendix, male nipples and the remnants of a uterus in men are just three. Evolution is the most well-supported scientific fact. There is a larger body of evidence vindicating it than there is to show that gravity is true which should tell readers something. Chapter 2 details the Scopes Monkey Trial, and how opposition against the theory of evolution is primarily based on a fear that evolution will lead to , then atheism and hence a total moral vacuum. The surfeit of theistic evolutionists is testament against this lie. They equate Darwinism with the Nazi "Ubermensch" regime, ignoring the fact that the Nazis believed in eugenics, a philosophy based on arrogance, racism and prejudice. Evolution, on the other hand, is based on facts, observation, experiments and testing. Sadly, Brian, the main antagonist against science, was not permitted to give his closing statements, but they are available online. A minute documentary was also made on the subject. Shermer follows the voluminous paper trail left by the Intelligent Design lobbyists. All of them, save one a disciple of Reverend Moon is an evangelical Christian. As they are so well-funded, organised and willing to waste so much time and taxpayer resources to force the lies of the ID movement into public schools, it is imperative that citizens concerned for the truth stand up and work against them. Teachers should be teaching proven scientific facts, not preaching from a state-funded pulpit through the intimidation of authority. I am grateful to Shermer for following the facts where they led him, and not starting from an assumed and impervious conclusion before setting out on this didactic quest for knowledge and elucidation. For IDers, their beliefs are little more than the use of the language of science as a Potemkin Village for Creationism. Those assertions that are testable - like the idea have of irreducible complexity - have been shown to be at odds with well known data. Those that are not - like the notion that because the universe exists in a fashion allowing our form of life to exist there must be a designer who wanted us to exist - are just not germane to a discussion within the bounds of science. You definitely would not want this book to be your only source of knowledge on evolution; it really is an introduction to the current attempt by religious elements in our society to destroy science and secular institutions and modes of thought or godless materialistic , if you wish. But it is a very good place to start. Schermer is a very, accessible writer and the book is short enough to be read in an afternoon. It is jargon light, so anyone should be able to pick this up and understand everything Schermer is writing about. Check it out. Apr 24, Kim Olson rated it really liked it. Once an evangelical Christian, Michael Shermer made the journey from creationist to evolutionist, as did Darwin himself, when his foray into the natural left him overwhelmed by evidence of evolution. In this book, Shermer now the publisher of Skeptic magazine details several specific arguments made by those who believe in Intelligent Design such as the belief that only micro- and not macro-evolution occurs. Then, one by one, he shows how each of these arguments fall apart at the mos Once an evangelical Christian, Michael Shermer made the journey from creationist to evolutionist, as did Darwin himself, when his foray into the natural sciences left him overwhelmed by evidence of evolution. Then, one by one, he shows how each of these arguments fall apart at the most crucial point. He sheds light on how little those who champion Intelligent Design many of whom are influencing textbook content seem to understand about even something as basic as the scientific method or the definition of "theory" in science. After discrediting Intelligent Design, Shermer goes on to make one of the more elegant arguments I've heard about how one can both accept evolution and a creator although not Intelligent Design , as many do. He makes attempts to explain why one might, but of course, must abandon intellectual rigor at this point. Still, the argument is eloquent and he does resolve the conflict. Proving the existence of gods, of course, is another matter, but that isn't his task. Jan 19, Halden rated it it was ok Shelves: nonfiction. The book is well written and full of facts and wry wit but I found it read like a primer, only useful for those about to debate a proponent of Intelligent Design ID. Now this maybe the goal of the book and if it is then it has accomplished it, but I was looking for more and this may have been where I went wrong. The book goes over the basics of evolution and of the advances made in biology since Darwin, which was interesting but not very in depth. Much of the text is spent educating the reader on the history of Creationism, ID and the legal battles in the US to get them taught as alternatives to Evolution. The focus on US court battles is where Shermer begins to lose me, I care to learn about the science but the legal battles, not so much. Once again I am probably falling victiim to not being the core audience for this book. This has now become one of my favourite science books. Shermer systematically takes all the arguments thrown at evolution by creationists and believers in intelligent design — or creationists to give them their proper name — and demonstrates the lack of science and the jargon used to blur the issue. Contrary to the popular belief of people like Ann Coulter, Darwinian evolution has withstood every criticism that has ever been thrown at it and is a robust scientific theory. Intelligent design is a This has now become one of my favourite science books. Intelligent design is a nonsense attempt to get Biblical creationism into the science class by changing the name; but when you get down to the basics, the general view is that an invisible magic man did it! Shermer began his academic life as creationist accepting the rebuttals of evolution at face value; then he actually looked at the science of evolution. Feb 08, Heather rated it did not like it. Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design - Michael Shermer - Google книги

Excellent book, well-documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. It's not a long read, and A short, easy-to-read book from the editor of Skeptic Magazine. Shermer discusses the difference between the science of evolution and the idea of intelligent design, and explains why the one is taught He is the founding publisher of Skeptic magazine, the editor of Skeptic. He lives in . Michael Shermer. On what basis do non-theists assert the survival of that which is good, and since the fittest are not always good what is to prevent the triumph of evil? Take a look at our prisons, bursting at the seams. Why do Islamics constantly battle with Christians? Not to mention many other murderous conflicts going on continuously? Why did, even in the limited confines of the United States, did we have a Civil War costing millions of lives? Are you crazy? I agree with Tomas Medina, I wish Dr. Shermer would take a harder stance against religion. Shermer has a wonderful way of speaking and writing in a more approachable manner that is accessible to the masses. If he were to be more blunt and brash, like Dawkins or even Maher, then his charm would be even more robust. Box Altadena, CA, Why Darwin Matters Order from Skeptic. Ty Phillips Says: February 11th, at am Your book is simply a breathtaking piece of brilliance. Ty Tomas A. Medina Says: April 1st, at pm This book is a masterpiece. Tom McMahon Says: April 2nd, at am Michael, Rare is the energy you bring to refuting the nonsensical arguments of creationists. Morbidly Cheerful Says: April 3rd, at am A must read for anyone that is confused about the evolution debate. A great piece of work. Gautam Says: July 16th, at am Spectacular and refreshing work! Bill Perron Says: July 16th, at am I have to wonder what it is that makes all of us without exception need some sort of god. Bill Perron Says: July 16th, at am Horrors!!!! The fallacy lies in the fact that there can be more than two answers for a question. This fallacy is also known to us as Gods of the Gaps. Science disproving religion This was probably the most important chapter of the book. It explains how religion takes care of emotions, friendship, societies whereas science takes care of knowing the world. Shermer left this question mostly unanswered without providing any solid hint if he choses any of these models. If I had to choose, my bet would be on Seperate World model. It is useless and waste of time to explain people why religion does not explain the world. Religion has been used as a shield for horrible things in the past, but if we can channel belief into something constructive, then it should be a much sought after option. I would not buy the argument that science and religion can coexist for the same topic. Science has made it very clear that the answer to our best of knowledge is Evolution by Natural Selection along with Artificial Selection. What about stars? In this case, I would have to choose evidence over faith. Science does not deal with all the things which religion deals with. Morality, for example is something which we humans accept as a part of the culture which has very little to do with science. Science is currently absent from the field of morality. Shelves: skepticism , , biology. Why Darwin Matters , by well-known skeptic author Michael Shermer, is an excellent introduction to the science, and lack thereof, behind the "controversy" between evolution and "Intelligent Design" ID creationism that has jeopardized science education in the USA. Those who are seeking an in-depth criticism of current ID arguments, however, will find this book lacking in particulars. Shermer begins with a concise survey of what evolution really is, and masterfully sets the historical stage in wh Why Darwin Matters , by well-known skeptic author Michael Shermer, is an excellent introduction to the science, and lack thereof, behind the "controversy" between evolution and "Intelligent Design" ID creationism that has jeopardized science education in the USA. Shermer begins with a concise survey of what evolution really is, and masterfully sets the historical stage in which evolution is pitted against Christian fundamentalism. He accurately pinpoints the major logical fallacies characteristic of ID creationists' arguments, and briefly surveys the "best" arguments put forth in favor of ID, touching on the flaws in each. Finally, he reveals some disturbing facts about the true motives of the ID movement. All in all, the book is beautifully organized and extremely well written. Nonetheless, it is not until the Coda—after the Epilogue—that Shermer drives home the central argument against ID, that it is scientifically vacuous: "The problem with the supernatural explanations of Intelligent Design is that there is nothing we can do with supernatural explanations. They lead to no data collection, no testable hypotheses, no quantifiable theories: therefore, no science. To the average American, that's why Darwin matters. The battle-hardened scientist or science teacher already embroiled in the "controversy" will learn little from Why Darwin Matters —but will still enjoy reading it. And for any up-and-coming defender of science, this book makes a perfect springboard from which to explore the politico- religious phenomenon of ID in greater depth. Jul 12, Corinne Edwards rated it really liked it Shelves: , the-nook-book-club , non-fiction , religion , science , evolution. I have come to the conclusion that the subtitle should actually be the title of this book. Sometimes I felt like I was in court and Intelligent Design was the defendant - Shermer's purpose was to lay down the facts regarding evolution is such a way as to explain why Intelligent Design is a scientific impossibility. Or, the fact that, in his opinion, Intelligent Design is not scientific at all. I rarely read books that are so thoroughly scientific. I'm not going to lie: sometimes I had to skim ove I have come to the conclusion that the subtitle should actually be the title of this book. I'm not going to lie: sometimes I had to skim over the most in-depth parts about RNA and mitochondria and the more nitty gritty aspects of evolutionary theory. But there was much that was interesting about studies that have been done and anecdotal stories about evolutionary science - these were very accessibly written. I feel like I now have a sense for what both sides of the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design debate assert and that I'm more able to have an informed discussion about the topic. He goes into this in depth, obviously, as he separates the theory of evolution from theological discourse. I appreciated that he acknowledged that yes, it is totally possible to be reconciled to both - but I also felt, and this bothered me, that he tended to be condescending regarding those who DID believe in Intelligent Design. Actually, the whole tone of the book felt a bit condescending to me - and even though he presents an excellent case and I don't even disagree with his point - I just wish he'd been less patronizing. This book got me thinking, that's for sure. I can't pretend this is the perfect summer beach read or that everyone will want to pick it up, but it helped me use my brain for a while, got me to sort through how I feel about a multitude of issues and for the most part, it did entertain me. So, take from that what you will. Sep 06, Gendou rated it it was amazing Shelves: science , biology , non-fiction , skepticism , atheism. This book doesn't go into the medical, biological, and zoological importance of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. It exposes the "Intelligent Design" movement as nothing more than non-scientific Creationism dressed up in a bed sheet like a Scooby-Doo ghost. View 2 comments. Jun 23, Dyary Abubakr rated it liked it. Evolution matters because science matters. Science matters because it is the preeminent story of our age, an epic saga about who we are, where we came from, and where we are going. Jun 24, Book rated it really liked it Shelves: evolution. It also provides lucid arguments in support of evolution. Positives: 1. One of the main reasons Michael Shermer is a very good author is because he understands his audience. He understands that this book is intended for the masses and he succeeds at providing the masses what it needs. A clear understanding of Why Darwin in fact matters and the facts about evolution, in an accessible manner. Shermer is also a very likeable and intelligent man and this comes through in his writing style which is straight forward, easy to follow yet profound. It's the perfect gift for someone who wants to know the facts from fiction regarding evolution and ID. It clearly shows why ID is not science by going over their arguments. Explains to the layman what constitutes scientific work. The concept of convergence of independent lines of evidence leads to the very compelling and single conclusion, that life evolved. Love the use of lists throughout the book, such as: vestigial structures, reasons why people resist the truth of evolutionary theory, seven strongest predictors of belief in God, reasons to engage in the debate between evolution and ID, arguments for ID, six cosmic numbers of the Anthropic Principle, ten "icons" of evolution, 7. Shermer knows how to get to the point and does a wonderful job with lists and other interesting tidbits. So much is covered succinctly in less than pages. A good section on science under attack and a discussion on important court cases. The truth behind the people behind the ID movement and their ultimate agenda. An interesting chapter on what the real unsolved problems in evolution truly are. A truly enjoyable introduction to evolution written in an accessible manner for all levels to enjoy. Extensive notes and the links work well. Negatives: 1. Not as technical as other books on the topic but provides great references for those who want to dig deeper. Table of contents work fine but you can't access it from the menu. I think the weakest part of the book is when Mr. Shermer tries to extend an olive branch of sorts to believers "Evolution makes for good theology. You can't allow faith to get in the way of the facts, no matter what they are. In summary, this book is another great addition to my evolutionary collection. Jan 11, John rated it it was amazing Shelves: science , books-i-own. In "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design" Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, reviews succinctly both the overwhelming evidence in support of contemporary evolutionary theory and the pseudoscientific religious nonsense known as Intelligent Design, and then, discusses "the real, unsolved problems in evolution". Shermer, for example, has ample space to describe briefly Ernst Mayr's theory of allopatric speciation, and its relationship to punctuated equilibrium, the e In "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design" Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, reviews succinctly both the overwhelming evidence in support of contemporary evolutionary theory and the pseudoscientific religious nonsense known as Intelligent Design, and then, discusses "the real, unsolved problems in evolution". Shermer, for example, has ample space to describe briefly Ernst Mayr's theory of allopatric speciation, and its relationship to punctuated equilibrium, the evolutionary paleontological theory developed by American invertebrate paleontologists Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould. But he also devotes ample space to dissecting Intelligent Design concepts like William Dembski's "Law of Conservation of Information", noting its irrelevance to both current mathematical information theory and the transfer and accretion of information - via DNA - in living biological systems. He offers an elegant overview of the origins and history of the so-called "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Debate", devoting ample time to the existence of the infamous "Wedge Document" and the trial proceedings of the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial and, of course, the harsh verdict rendered by Federal Judge John E. Shermer's terse tome is noteworthy for several reasons. First, he recognizes the necessity for engaging Intelligent Design advocates like Michael Behe and William Dembski, among others, in debates between themselves and knowledgeable critics on behalf of genuine science like Shermer, if only to educate public audiences on the nature of scientific inquiry, the ample facts obtained from genuine scientific research, and the disingenuous lies, half-truths, and omissions promoted zealously by Intelligent Design advocates. Second, he makes a most persuasive case explaining why evolution ought to be accepted by conservatives, as the agent ultimately responsible for the origins of morality in humans, and that "survival of the fittest" could be seen as a biological application of Adam Smith's concept of laissez faire free market economics. Last, but not least, Shermer contends that science should be viewed as being complementary towards spirituality, by engendering a "sense of awe" in viewing, for example, distant galaxies; therefore evolution can and should be seen in this very light. For these reasons, Shermer's terse tome deserves a place on the bookshelves of as wide a readership as possible. Reposted from my Amazon review Aug 04, Pankaj Singh rated it it was amazing. Shermer is extremely respectful towards the creationists, but still firm enough when demonstrating how wrong they are. The longest chapter in this book gives space to the ID arguments. Shermer describes in detail what ID proponents claim, and then tears each argument down beautifully. Of course, a book on a topic like this is bound to attract creationists who just love one starring. The funniest reason I read for disliking this book was " Shermer quotes himself". Well, if you have published tons of books and papers, you have the right to quote yourself. I just feel sorry for all the people who dismiss evolution before understanding it. As Shermer points out, by claiming God conjured humans like a cheap magic trick, one takes away credit from God. Creationism and intelligent design are not just terrible science, they are bad theology. Excellent book, well- documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. It's not a long read, and covers much material previously published, but I like that Shermer is willing to engage the purveyors of non-science, for while I agree with Dawkins et al that engaging in debate legitimizes what is absurd, someone needs to cogently demonstrate such absurdity. He does a good job explaining why scien Excellent book, well-documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. He does a good job explaining why science cannot disprove religion but also how religion cannot conscript science to support its aims, for science easily disproves such attempts if that door is opened.. Jul 10, Tyler Malone rated it really liked it. A book to give to a Bible believing Baptist. It's easy to read and the ideas are stripped down. There are a few passages that attempt to bridge real science with those who believe that the Bible's creation story is factual.

Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design by Michael Shermer

If the ID people moved further to the right and acknowledged the indisputable facts while sensibly debating the things that really are unclear, I might have to start taking them seriously. So far, though, I don't see any obvious signs of that happening. For the record, here are my top objections to mainstream ID: 1. It shouldn't make a difference to a theory what specific labels you use for the key concepts. Quantum chromodynamics would be just as respectable if you replaced "red", "blue" and "green" with "sweet", "sour" and "salty". They're just names. ID doesn't sound too bad if you say "God created the different species" or "Some higher intelligence did it". But if you paraphrase the theory as "Very long-lived, technologically advanced aliens have been messing with the DNA for the last several hundred million years", then people who like ID get all upset. It seems to me that this is already a serious warning sign. It's bad science, because it doesn't make any testable predictions. Or, to put it another way, proponents of ID refuse to put their money where their mouth is. They won't come out and name any specific thing we can check, that would be turn out to be true if their theory were correct. How seriously would you take an investment analyst who never actually recommended that you buy or sell a particular stock? People get a reputation for being good because they've called it right enough times. It's disrespectful to God. I don't myself believe in God - but, if I did, I would like to take seriously the idea that He is all-powerful. So I wouldn't much appreciate arguments along the lines of "Having thought about it for several minutes, I don't see how the human eye could have evolved by natural selection, so it must have been designed". To me, the truly impressive demonstration of God's power would be to have been able to set things up so cleverly that the eye arose as a consequence of natural selection among creatures who initially didn't have eyes. I freely admit that I don't understand all the details. But it seems incredibly presumptuous to say that, just because my mortal mind is having a bit of trouble grasping this particular piece of the sequence, then it couldn't have happened. I think that this is a serious misreading of what the word "omnipotent" means. I often have to review papers on computational linguistics and language engineering, and the ones I'm most impressed with are those in which some apparently simple idea turns out to have many subtle and unexpected consequences. I'm less thrilled by the ones where the author keeps having to invent special-purpose hacks to take care of every little problem. It seems to me that the ID people are saying that God couldn't come up with any clean, elegant way to create life because it was too technically demanding, so He had to resort to a bunch of special-purpose hacks. Guys, I hate to be the one to point it out to you, but that's called blasphemy. It is particularly impressive that he did so before the concept of evolution had even been discovered: It surely argues more power in the Deity to delegate a certain degree of power to inferior creatures than to produce every thing by his own immediate volition. It argues more wisdom to contrive at first the fabric of the world with such perfect foresight that, of itself, and by its proper operation, it may serve all the purposes of Providence, than if the great Creator were obliged at every moment to adjust its parts, and animate by his breath all the wheels of that stupendous machine. View all comments. Feb 09, Scott Lerch rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: any creationists. Shelves: own-deadtree , to-read-owned , science , for , evolution , This is probably one of the finest books to pick up, in case you were confused about Creationism or Intelligent Design controversy. The Author Michael Shermer is former self-declared creationist who spent a big deal of his young adult life enthusiastically spreadin This is probably one of the finest books to pick up, in case you were confused about Creationism or Intelligent Design controversy. The Author Michael Shermer is former self-declared creationist who spent a big deal of his young adult life enthusiastically spreading creationism. Later in his life he saw reason and realized that the creationism movement was not portraying evolution correctly. Having been in that movement, he understands how creationists and Intelligent Design ID advocates think and push their agenda. He mentioned a few of them: male nipples, male uterus, anomalous thirteen ribs, tail bone, wisdom teeth, appendix, body hair, goosebumps etc. What they do care is about whether teaching evolution will make their kids reject God, allows criminals and sinners to blame their genes for their actions and generally cause society to fall apart. The members of ID would claim in court that their theory [sic] has nothing to do with religion and outside the court they would profess their love for God and link ID with God without caring that their statements are being recorded in public. It would be surprising if such people who are anything but intelligent cant come up with the Intelligent Design explanation of existence of life. Even though it is fruitless, refusal to take up the debate challenge can be seen as weak of insecurity of the scientists. If science is not able to explain something, then it is an implicit proof that ID is right. The fallacy lies in the fact that there can be more than two answers for a question. This fallacy is also known to us as Gods of the Gaps. Science disproving religion This was probably the most important chapter of the book. It explains how religion takes care of emotions, friendship, societies whereas science takes care of knowing the world. Shermer left this question mostly unanswered without providing any solid hint if he choses any of these models. If I had to choose, my bet would be on Seperate World model. It is useless and waste of time to explain people why religion does not explain the world. Religion has been used as a shield for horrible things in the past, but if we can channel belief into something constructive, then it should be a much sought after option. I would not buy the argument that science and religion can coexist for the same topic. Science has made it very clear that the answer to our best of knowledge is Evolution by Natural Selection along with Artificial Selection. What about stars? In this case, I would have to choose evidence over faith. Science does not deal with all the things which religion deals with. Morality, for example is something which we humans accept as a part of the culture which has very little to do with science. Science is currently absent from the field of morality. Shelves: skepticism , , biology. Why Darwin Matters , by well-known skeptic author Michael Shermer, is an excellent introduction to the science, and lack thereof, behind the "controversy" between evolution and "Intelligent Design" ID creationism that has jeopardized science education in the USA. Those who are seeking an in-depth criticism of current ID arguments, however, will find this book lacking in particulars. Shermer begins with a concise survey of what evolution really is, and masterfully sets the historical stage in wh Why Darwin Matters , by well-known skeptic author Michael Shermer, is an excellent introduction to the science, and lack thereof, behind the "controversy" between evolution and "Intelligent Design" ID creationism that has jeopardized science education in the USA. Shermer begins with a concise survey of what evolution really is, and masterfully sets the historical stage in which evolution is pitted against Christian fundamentalism. He accurately pinpoints the major logical fallacies characteristic of ID creationists' arguments, and briefly surveys the "best" arguments put forth in favor of ID, touching on the flaws in each. Finally, he reveals some disturbing facts about the true motives of the ID movement. All in all, the book is beautifully organized and extremely well written. Nonetheless, it is not until the Coda—after the Epilogue—that Shermer drives home the central argument against ID, that it is scientifically vacuous: "The problem with the supernatural explanations of Intelligent Design is that there is nothing we can do with supernatural explanations. They lead to no data collection, no testable hypotheses, no quantifiable theories: therefore, no science. To the average American, that's why Darwin matters. The battle-hardened scientist or science teacher already embroiled in the "controversy" will learn little from Why Darwin Matters —but will still enjoy reading it. And for any up-and-coming defender of science, this book makes a perfect springboard from which to explore the politico-religious phenomenon of ID in greater depth. Jul 12, Corinne Edwards rated it really liked it Shelves: , the-nook-book-club , non-fiction , religion , science , evolution. I have come to the conclusion that the subtitle should actually be the title of this book. Sometimes I felt like I was in court and Intelligent Design was the defendant - Shermer's purpose was to lay down the facts regarding evolution is such a way as to explain why Intelligent Design is a scientific impossibility. Or, the fact that, in his opinion, Intelligent Design is not scientific at all. I rarely read books that are so thoroughly scientific. I'm not going to lie: sometimes I had to skim ove I have come to the conclusion that the subtitle should actually be the title of this book. I'm not going to lie: sometimes I had to skim over the most in-depth parts about RNA and mitochondria and the more nitty gritty aspects of evolutionary theory. But there was much that was interesting about studies that have been done and anecdotal stories about evolutionary science - these were very accessibly written. I feel like I now have a sense for what both sides of the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design debate assert and that I'm more able to have an informed discussion about the topic. He goes into this in depth, obviously, as he separates the theory of evolution from theological discourse. I appreciated that he acknowledged that yes, it is totally possible to be reconciled to both - but I also felt, and this bothered me, that he tended to be condescending regarding those who DID believe in Intelligent Design. Actually, the whole tone of the book felt a bit condescending to me - and even though he presents an excellent case and I don't even disagree with his point - I just wish he'd been less patronizing. This book got me thinking, that's for sure. I can't pretend this is the perfect summer beach read or that everyone will want to pick it up, but it helped me use my brain for a while, got me to sort through how I feel about a multitude of issues and for the most part, it did entertain me. So, take from that what you will. Sep 06, Gendou rated it it was amazing Shelves: science , biology , non-fiction , skepticism , atheism. This book doesn't go into the medical, biological, and zoological importance of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. It exposes the "Intelligent Design" movement as nothing more than non-scientific Creationism dressed up in a bed sheet like a Scooby-Doo ghost. View 2 comments. Jun 23, Dyary Abubakr rated it liked it. Evolution matters because science matters. Science matters because it is the preeminent story of our age, an epic saga about who we are, where we came from, and where we are going. Jun 24, Book rated it really liked it Shelves: evolution. It also provides lucid arguments in support of evolution. Positives: 1. One of the main reasons Michael Shermer is a very good author is because he understands his audience. He understands that this book is intended for the masses and he succeeds at providing the masses what it needs. A clear understanding of Why Darwin in fact matters and the facts about evolution, in an accessible manner. Shermer is also a very likeable and intelligent man and this comes through in his writing style which is straight forward, easy to follow yet profound. It's the perfect gift for someone who wants to know the facts from fiction regarding evolution and ID. It clearly shows why ID is not science by going over their arguments. Explains to the layman what constitutes scientific work. The concept of convergence of independent lines of evidence leads to the very compelling and single conclusion, that life evolved. Love the use of lists throughout the book, such as: vestigial structures, reasons why people resist the truth of evolutionary theory, seven strongest predictors of belief in God, reasons to engage in the debate between evolution and ID, arguments for ID, six cosmic numbers of the Anthropic Principle, ten "icons" of evolution, 7. Shermer knows how to get to the point and does a wonderful job with lists and other interesting tidbits. So much is covered succinctly in less than pages. A good section on science under attack and a discussion on important court cases. The truth behind the people behind the ID movement and their ultimate agenda. An interesting chapter on what the real unsolved problems in evolution truly are. A truly enjoyable introduction to evolution written in an accessible manner for all levels to enjoy. Extensive notes and the links work well. Negatives: 1. Not as technical as other books on the topic but provides great references for those who want to dig deeper. Table of contents work fine but you can't access it from the menu. I think the weakest part of the book is when Mr. Shermer tries to extend an olive branch of sorts to believers "Evolution makes for good theology. You can't allow faith to get in the way of the facts, no matter what they are. In summary, this book is another great addition to my evolutionary collection. Jan 11, John rated it it was amazing Shelves: science , books-i-own. In "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design" Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, reviews succinctly both the overwhelming evidence in support of contemporary evolutionary theory and the pseudoscientific religious nonsense known as Intelligent Design, and then, discusses "the real, unsolved problems in evolution". Shermer, for example, has ample space to describe briefly Ernst Mayr's theory of allopatric speciation, and its relationship to punctuated equilibrium, the e In "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design" Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, reviews succinctly both the overwhelming evidence in support of contemporary evolutionary theory and the pseudoscientific religious nonsense known as Intelligent Design, and then, discusses "the real, unsolved problems in evolution". Shermer, for example, has ample space to describe briefly Ernst Mayr's theory of allopatric speciation, and its relationship to punctuated equilibrium, the evolutionary paleontological theory developed by American invertebrate paleontologists Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould. But he also devotes ample space to dissecting Intelligent Design concepts like William Dembski's "Law of Conservation of Information", noting its irrelevance to both current mathematical information theory and the transfer and accretion of information - via DNA - in living biological systems. He offers an elegant overview of the origins and history of the so-called "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Debate", devoting ample time to the existence of the infamous "Wedge Document" and the trial proceedings of the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial and, of course, the harsh verdict rendered by Federal Judge John E. Shermer's terse tome is noteworthy for several reasons. First, he recognizes the necessity for engaging Intelligent Design advocates like Michael Behe and William Dembski, among others, in debates between themselves and knowledgeable critics on behalf of genuine science like Shermer, if only to educate public audiences on the nature of scientific inquiry, the ample facts obtained from genuine scientific research, and the disingenuous lies, half-truths, and omissions promoted zealously by Intelligent Design advocates. Second, he makes a most persuasive case explaining why evolution ought to be accepted by conservatives, as the agent ultimately responsible for the origins of morality in humans, and that "survival of the fittest" could be seen as a biological application of Adam Smith's concept of laissez faire free market economics. Last, but not least, Shermer contends that science should be viewed as being complementary towards spirituality, by engendering a "sense of awe" in viewing, for example, distant galaxies; therefore evolution can and should be seen in this very light. For these reasons, Shermer's terse tome deserves a place on the bookshelves of as wide a readership as possible. Reposted from my Amazon review Aug 04, Pankaj Singh rated it it was amazing. Shermer is extremely respectful towards the creationists, but still firm enough when demonstrating how wrong they are. The longest chapter in this book gives space to the ID arguments. Shermer describes in detail what ID proponents claim, and then tears each argument down beautifully. Of course, a book on a topic like this is bound to attract creationists who just love one starring. The funniest reason I read for disliking this book was " Shermer quotes himself". Well, if you have published tons of books and papers, you have the right to quote yourself. I just feel sorry for all the people who dismiss evolution before understanding it. As Shermer points out, by claiming God conjured humans like a cheap magic trick, one takes away credit from God. Creationism and intelligent design are not just terrible science, they are bad theology. Excellent book, well-documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. It's not a long read, and covers much material previously published, but I like that Shermer is willing to engage the purveyors of non-science, for while I agree with Dawkins et al that engaging in debate legitimizes what is absurd, someone needs to cogently demonstrate such absurdity. He does a good job explaining why scien Excellent book, well-documented, well-reasoned and goes on the "must read" list for our homeschoolers, if only to learn from Shermer in how to frame and refute the arguments. He does a good job explaining why science cannot disprove religion but also how religion cannot conscript science to support its aims, for science easily disproves such attempts if that door is opened.. Jul 10, Tyler Malone rated it really liked it. A book to give to a Bible believing Baptist. It's easy to read and the ideas are stripped down. There are a few passages that attempt to bridge real science with those who believe that the Bible's creation story is factual. I choose to merit this book for what it tries to do -- reach the ignorant, not what I think it should be. Jul 24, Byron rated it it was amazing. Excellent overview of the how evolution is among the most tested and observed hypothesis in natural science and how it dovetails or not with the various theories of creationism and intelligent design. I have read other books by Shermer who write technical subjects with interest and clarity. This book isn't necessarily tremendously original, but it IS pretty good in that good arguments are made, facts are laid out, idiocies are exposed -- again -- and thus it's one more nail in the coffin of religion and most especially Abrahaminic theism, particularly as practised by most Christians and especially evangelicals and fundies in America. Having grown up in that tradition, being steeped in it, having played leadership roles, been a missionary, was Billy Graham's youngest counselor, we This book isn't necessarily tremendously original, but it IS pretty good in that good arguments are made, facts are laid out, idiocies are exposed -- again -- and thus it's one more nail in the coffin of religion and most especially Abrahaminic theism, particularly as practised by most Christians and especially evangelicals and fundies in America. Having grown up in that tradition, being steeped in it, having played leadership roles, been a missionary, was Billy Graham's youngest counselor, went to a Presbyterian college, etc. And on and on. I don't need to write a book; plenty enough have already been written. So, the concept of "intelligent design" is a hilarious fraud masquerading as "science," although virtually no actual, real scientists acknowledge it as legitimate since it doesn't stand up to the scientific method, among many other reasons, and thus back to Darwin. Again, not the first or best book on the subject, but not bad and again, just another nail in the coffin of a failed and inhumane prehistoric myth. Jul 14, Winston Jen rated it it was amazing. Why Facts Matter Why Darwin Matters is an immensely readable book about a very complicated and crucial subject: evolution. Beginning with Shermer's account of an archaeological dig for fossils and a description of how the Earth is most certainly NOT fined tuned for life. With the sustained indignation of a former creationist, Shermer is savage about the shortcomings of intelligent design and eloquent about the spirituality of science. In Why Darwin Matters, he has assembled an invaluable primer for anyone caught up in an argument with a well-intentioned intelligent design advocate. Jim Walker wrote, "This book should appeal to Christians who want to understand evolution but who do not want to feel offended by the anti- religious tone of some evolutionary scientists. Shermer carefully explains, in a non-threatening manner, how evolution and natural selection works while also explaining why Intelligent Design theory cannot explain the diversity of life on the planet earth. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Dewey Decimal. . August 30, Retrieved Categories : in science non-fiction books Books about Charles Darwin Books by Michael Shermer Criticism of intelligent design English-language books Popular science books Scientific skepticism mass media.

https://static.s123-cdn-static.com/uploads/4640778/normal_601f54ffd4962.pdf https://static.s123-cdn-static.com/uploads/4641971/normal_601ff12ed950c.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9587375/UploadedFiles/E913BC15-25F4-5C83-507F-814C3DC861A1.pdf https://static.s123-cdn-static.com/uploads/4640959/normal_602143b2a231f.pdf