Critical Chiropractor, Inept Publisher

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Critical Chiropractor, Inept Publisher SI N-D 2006 pgs 9/27/06 9:45 AM Page 56 BOOK REVIEWS nothing and everything at the same approach where “religion [is] always a (pp. 123–124). And nothing, of course, time—supposedly whatever the reader potential threat to science.” Christian can be both natural and supernatural at needs, so long as she renounces science readers, however, are quite predictably once. Christians must swear to the exis- and politics—is more significant. directed to select the ever peace-loving tence of a rigid yet unproven boundary Theists should not care when or how and submissive option number three. between religion and science “or else, as their god created life, Shermer instructs. Thus, each party is allowed to have the book of Proverbs (11:29) warned: Only scientists should ponder such its cake and devour it too. Scientists may ‘He that troubleth his own house shall questions because god does not really test and debate reality amongst them- inherit the wind.’” So, why does Darwin “exist” in any intelligible way; god is selves, undistracted by the mental mean- really matter? Because, at the individual “being itself, not a being” (p. 44). derings of common slobs. Religionists level, religion matters too much to risk. Quoting favored theologians, former may enjoy vague and occasional comfort Less erudite and stylistic than Daw- president and Christian evangelist Jimmy in their “spiritual fitness” as they shuffle kins, less technical and apolitical than Carter, and, twice, Pope John Paul II, their children off to public schools Shanks, Michael Shermer’s latest text on Shermer at times seems obsessed with the where they will learn to dutifully add, evolution is both considerable as an edu- maintenance of a pleasantly innocuous subtract, and memorize the Krebs cycle, cational endeavor and, as usual, enter- Christianity. Even Charles Darwin, the but never confront issues the potential taining to the point of betraying the author emphasizes, never thought of him- solution to which might improve (if not author’s unique intellectual playful- self as an atheist, and, for whatever rea- preserve) innumerable future lives. ness—a more Pigliucci-like contribu- sons, declined to criticize or even discuss But if religionists refuse to accept a tion to the reasonably intelligent layper- supernaturalism. At that, readers are asked watered-down deity and to leave well son’s continuing science education. to choose one of three familiar attitudes enough alone, Shermer warns, they will Notwithstanding its dubious premise toward the relationship between science suffer dearly. Religion and science can be and arguably mischievous aim, Why and religion: the Conflicting Worlds, reconciled only through confession to Darwin Matters will prove a worthwhile Same World, and Separate Worlds mod- “different realities,” because “if you push experience for truly curious and, thus els. For himself, Shermer has privately the science to its logical conclusion, far, open-minded generalists, if such chosen the first position, the “warfare” you will end up naturalizing the deity” creatures really exist. Placebo, Reassurance, Evidence-Based Critical Chiropractor, Medicine, Spinal Manipulation, Ther- apy, Occupation, and Natural History. Inept Publisher He explains that most episodes of HARRIET A. HALL back pain will resolve in a short time with no treatment at all. Simple com- The P.R.E.S.T.O.N. Protocol for Back Pain: The Seven fort measures can be tried at home Evidence-Based Practices for Living Pain Free, by Preston H. using ice, heat, exercise, and anal- Long. PublishAmerica: Baltimore, 2006. 84 pp. ISBN 1- gesics. He stresses that remaining 4241-0684-2. Paperback, $14.95. active is the best thing to prevent chronic disability, and that the and limit their practice to evidence- really, really wanted to recommend patient’s attitude is important. Fear based treatments. His previous book, The P.R.E.S.T.O.N. Protocol for Back and avoidance behavior can cause pain The Naked Chiropractor: Insider’s Guide IPain, but I cannot. It is full of excel- to become chronic, and patients who to Combating Quackery and Winning the lent information that I wish could be dislike their jobs are less likely to War against Pain, recounted how he widely disseminated, but the author was recover. He suggests that three factors questioned and rejected much of what betrayed by an incompetent publisher. might be used to predict outcome: he was taught in chiropractic school. Preston Long, PhD, is one of a rare whether the patient flosses regularly, This new book describes the best evi- breed: chiropractors who can think crit- whether he wears a seat belt consis- dence for what works in the treatment ically, understand the scientific method, tently, and whether he enjoys his job. of back pain, and is meant to be a self- There are errors on almost every page: Harriet Hall is a retired physician who help manual that will preclude the need writes about alternative medicine and for most patients to seek professional errors of spelling, errors of grammar, frag- pseudoscience. She wrote “Teaching Pigs to treatment of any kind. ments, missing references and improperly Sing” in our May/June 2006 issue. E-mail: He offers excellent advice under cited references, inconsistent punctua- [email protected]. the chapter headings P.R.E.S.T.O.N.: tion, and even missing quotation marks. 56 Volume 30, Issue 6 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER SI N-D 2006 pgs 9/27/06 9:46 AM Page 57 BOOK REVIEWS Almost any published book contains read this and restrain his red pencil. they submitted it, they were immedi- a few errors, but this is beyond the pale. There is solid content in this book, ately offered a contract. It is apparent that no proofreading was and a great deal of useful information. I I contacted Dr. Long, and he con- done, and that not even a spell-checker suppose a reader could learn a lot from firmed he was given no help, no proof- was employed. it; but it takes more effort than it should reading, and no editing. The Houston Veterans Affairs Med- to make sense of many passages. It cer- One of the things that worries me as ical Center is the “Houston Infections tainly doesn’t inspire confidence in a a skeptic is that I know we all have blind Administration Medical Center,” aceta- reader with no prior knowledge of the spots, and I keep wondering what mine minophen is acetametaphen, Ecuador is subject. It gives the impression that the are. Long is a critical thinker about chi- Equador, Dr. Lundberg becomes Lun- author isn’t thinking clearly and is ter- ropractic, but he was unaccountably berg, and the Cochrane Reports Cochran minally careless (or dyslexic). gullible in his choice of a publisher. If he Reports. Even the misspellings are incon- The publisher is PublishAmerica, an had applied his critical thinking skills to sistent. He refers to a “le phage” surgical organization that apparently will pub- this decision, he might have produced a treatment; I was unable to find any such lish anything. It claims to not be a “van- superb book. As it is, he has produced thing. The most egregious error is “The ity” press, since it doesn’t charge authors an embarrassing travesty. He has a lot to old adage of pre rom non nosier, first do a fee and actually pays them a one dollar offer, and I hope he will try again with a no more, must always be borne in advance. However, it leaves publicity competent publisher. mind.” I imagine he meant primum non and marketing pretty much up to the Samuel Homola, D.C., is another nocere which means first do no harm. author himself, and prints books only evidence-based chiropractor who was The writing descends into incoher- on an on-demand basis. Many com- more fortunate in his choice of publish- ent confusion in places. As an exercise in plaints have been lodged against it (a ers. If you want to learn the truth about editing, see if you can make sense out of sampling can be found at www.absolute chiropractic and the best way to care for the following two paragraphs and write.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1 your own back, Homola’s Inside rewrite them more clearly: 0211). A group of authors tested Chiropractic and The Chiropractor’s Self- A Scottish Naval surgeon by the name Publish America by collaborating on Help Back and Body Book are much bet- of James Lind tried to control scurvy “the worst book ever written.” When ter choices than Long’s book. for the British Navy, as it was a huge problem back then, by watching the sailors that received oranges and lemons versus those that did not. This The Privacy Threat, pioneer study pretty much controlled scurvy by 1814. Watching that the Revelations, and soldiers who received a lemon or an orange did not develop scurvy, and the ones who did not receive the fruit, Relevancy did develop the disease. WENDY M. GROSSMAN As in the United States, Lind’s work did not take fruition immedi- Spychips: How Major Corporations and Governments Plan to ately. It took approximately forty to forty-five years before it was actually Track Your Every Move with RFID. ISBN 1-5955-5020-8. totally received by the pertinent 288 pp. Hardcover, $24.99. authorities. His research took place on May 20, 1747, and even though The Spychips Threat: Why Christians Should Resist RFID and there were positive outcomes, the Electronic Surveillance. ISBN 1-5955-5021-6. 288 pp. forty-two-year lag occurred and ini- Paperback, $14.99. Both by Katherine Albrecht and Liz tially it didn’t have any impact on the McIntyre, published by Thomas Nelson, Inc., Nashville, medical opinion in Britain.
Recommended publications
  • Patternicity and Persuasion: Evolutionary Biology As a Bridge Between Economic and Narrative Analysis in the Law
    PATTERNICITY AND PERSUASION: EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY AS A BRIDGE BETWEEN ECONOMIC AND NARRATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE LAW James D. Ridgway* ―We are not Homo sapiens, Wise Man . We are Pan narrans, the storytelling ape.‖1 A defining characteristic of humanity is our pervasive use of tools to solve problems. Legal theory is an endeavor with its own toolbox: methods of construction and deconstruction that are applied to a huge spectrum of problems. In recent years, economics has been one of the law‘s dominant analytical tools, and evolutionary biology has rapidly increased in its usage.2 Narrative theory—the study of storytelling and how it influences the decision-making process3—is far less discussed as a tool of legal analysis, but has its own adherents. Although these tools are clearly useful, their foundations and persuasive power have not been fully explored. As demonstrated by this article, evolutionary biology can now explain how human beings instinctively approach legal analysis and what features from economic and narrative analysis are rooted in the information processing functions of the brain. As a result, the most effective aspects of each can be synthesized into a new tool: analysis of the archetypal interactions that can be used to dissect any legal problem. On the surface, these tools may appear to be distinct. Yet, the connections between economics, narrative theory, and evolution run deep. Charles Darwin was aware of the power of narratives, and historians agree * Professorial Lecturer in Law, the George Washington University School of Law. This paper was presented at the Twelfth Society for Evolutionary Analysis in Law Scholarship Conference at the Loyola Law School-Los Angeles in February 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Brant Shermer
    Curriculum Vitae Michael Brant Shermer 2761 N. Marengo Ave., Altadena, CA 91001 626/794-3119 (P), 626/794-1301 (F), [email protected] Education Ph.D. Claremont Graduate School: 1991 History of Science (Dissertation: Alfred Russel Wallace: Heretic Scientist. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Information Service) M.A. California State University, Fullerton: 1978 Experimental Psychology B.A. Pepperdine University: 1976 Psychology/Biology Professional Positions 2010 – Present: Presidential Fellow, Chapman University 2007 - 2011: Adjunct Professor, Claremont Graduate University 1992 - Present: Founding Publisher/Editor-in-Chief, Skeptic magazine 1992 - Present: Executive Director, Skeptics Society 2015 - Present: Host, Science Salon Podcast 2001 - 2019: Contributing Editor and Monthly Columnist, Scientific American 1992 - 2015: Host, Skeptics Lecture Series at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) 1998 - 2010: Science Correspondent, KPCC, 89.3 FM, NPR affiliate for L.A. 1999 - 2000 Consulting Producer/Host, Exploring the Unknown 13-hour TV series, Fox Family 1989 - 1998 Adjunct Professor, Cultural Studies Program, Occidental College 1991 - 1993 Adjunct Professor, History of Science, California State University, Los Angeles 1986 - 1991 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Glendale College 1980 - 1986 Instructor of Psychology, Glendale College Courses Taught Chapman University (2010-Present): Skepticism 101: How to Think Like a Scientist Honors Seminar: The Moral Arc of Science Honors Seminar: Evolution, Ethics, and Morality Claremont Graduate University (2007-2011): Evolution, Economics, and the Brain Science and Morality Occidental College (1989-1998): 1. Science: Its History and Impact from Copernicus to Einstein 2. Evolution: The History and Science of the Theory 3. European Intellectual and Cultural History 4. Science, Technology, and Culture (Core program team-taught course) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disbelieving Michael Shermer: a Review Essay of Michael Shermer’S the Believing Brain
    Volume 5, No. 1, April 2012 89 The Disbelieving Michael Shermer: A Review Essay of Michael Shermer’s The Believing Brain Eugene A. Curry1 Michael Shermer. The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies: How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths. New York: Times Books, 2011. ISBN-13: 978-0805091250 (hardcover). 400 pages. $28.00 Introduction Michael Shermer is an interesting man. He is a former professional cyclist, a professor at Claremont Graduate University in California, and the Executive Director of the Skeptics Society. It is in this last role as a professional unbeliever that Shermer has really made a name for himself. Raised within a household largely apathetic to religious issues, Shermer embraced Christianity as a teenager and pursued his new spirituality with gusto. But after some time Shermer‘s faith began to wane and ultimately guttered out. Now, armed with an education in experimental psychology and history, Shermer opposes belief in all things supernatural and paranormal by writing books on these issues, publishing a magazine entitled Skeptic, debating prominent believers, and standing in as the designated doubter in various media appearances. 1. Eugene Curry is Senior Pastor of The First Baptist Church of Granada Hills, CA. E- mail: [email protected] 90 The Journal of the International Society of Christian Apologetics Shermer‘s latest book, The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies—How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths, pursues this very track, sketching out the various dynamics that undergird human thought and then analyzing a range of beliefs he finds incredible with reference to that theoretical framework.
    [Show full text]
  • CFI-Annual-Report-2018.Pdf
    Message from the President and CEO Last year was another banner year for the Center the interests of people who embrace reason, for Inquiry. We worked our secular magic in a science, and humanism—the principles of the vast variety of ways: from saving lives of secular Enlightenment. activists around the world who are threatened It is no secret that these powerful ideas like with violence and persecution to taking the no others have advanced humankind by nation’s largest drugstore chain, CVS, to court unlocking human potential, promoting goodness, for marketing homeopathic snake oil as if it’s real and exposing the true nature of reality. If you medicine. are looking for humanity’s true salvation, CFI stands up for reason and science in a way no look no further. other organization in the country does, because This past year we sought to export those ideas to we promote secular and humanist values as well places where they have yet to penetrate. as scientific skepticism and critical thinking. The Translations Project has taken the influential But you likely already know that if you are reading evolutionary biology and atheism books of this report, as it is designed with our supporters in Richard Dawkins and translated them into four mind. We want you not only to be informed about languages dominant in the Muslim world: Arabic, where your investment is going; we want you to Urdu, Indonesian, and Farsi. They are available for take pride in what we have achieved together. free download on a special website. It is just one When I meet people who are not familiar with CFI, of many such projects aimed at educating people they often ask what it is we do.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Why Darwin Matters Matters Why Darwin Matters: the Case Against Intelligent Design, by Michael Shermer
    Evo Edu Outreach DOI 10.1007/s12052-008-0109-9 BOOK REVIEW Why Why Darwin Matters Matters Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design, by Michael Shermer. New York: Henry Holt, 2006. Pp. xxii + 199. S/b $14.00 Tania Lombrozo # The Author(s) 2008. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com The first decade of the twenty-first century will be a curious a brief but lucid overview of key evolutionary ideas. He chapter in the future history of evolutionary thought. In emphasizes that the source of resistance to evolution is rarely 2005, resistance to evolution manifested in the highly the scientific details but rather the perceived consequences of publicized trial of Dover, Pennsylvania over teaching evolution: atheism, ethical nihilism, and a lack of meaning. Intelligent Design in public schools. Only four years later, What people care about “is whether teaching evolution will in 2009, universities, museums, and individuals across the make their kids reject God, allow criminals and sinners to globe celebrate the 150th anniversary of the publication of blame their genes for their actions, and generally cause society Darwin’s Origin of Species. Released in the interlude, to fall apart” (p. 25). But according to Shermer, an even Michael Shermer’s Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against greater threat to the theory of evolution is misunderstanding. Intelligent Design takes on the challenge these landmark A large proportion of the public not only misunderstands dates represent: how a thoroughly vetted and accepted evolutionary theory but also aspects of science and the scientific theory can be the source of so much cultural scientific process—for example, that calling evolution a conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Isagenix a Case Study in Flawed Thinking
    SI Jan Feb 11 from home_SI new design masters 11/12/10 11:56 AM Page 41 Defending Isagenix A Case Study in Flawed Thinking Do those who comment on blogs even read the articles they are responding to? Here is a case study in emotional thinking, ad hominem arguments, logical fallacies, irrationality, and misinformation. HARRIET HALL he Internet is a wonderful medium for communicat- To illustrate, let’s look at some re- sponses to a piece I wrote about a ing ideas and information in a rapid, interactive way. weight-loss product called Isagenix, TMany online articles are followed by a section for which is sold through a multilevel mar- comments. Like so many things in this imperfect world, keting (MLM) scheme. To quote its website verbatim, “The Isagenix cleanse comments are a mixed blessing. They can enhance the ar- is unique because it not only removes ticle by correcting errors, adding further information, or impurities at the cellular level, it builds contributing useful thoughts to a productive discussion. the body up with incredible nutrition. Besides detoxing the body, Isagenix But all too often the comments section consists of emo- teaches people a wonderful lesson that tional outbursts, unwarranted personal attacks on the au- they don’t need to eat as much as they thor, logical fallacies, and misinformation. It provides are accustom [sic] to and eating healthy choices are really important and also a irrational and ignorant people with a soapbox from which lot of the food we are eating is nutri- to promote prejudices and false information.
    [Show full text]
  • One User's Perspective
    How Thinking Goes Wrong Twenty-five Fallacies That Lead Us to Believe Weird Things • From Chapter 3 of “Why people believe weird things” by Michael Shermer 18-Sept-2014 Phys 192 Lecture 3 1 Announcement • Starting next week, class will meet from 1-1:50pm. • We will not go past 1:50pm. • Location is unchanged. • You can always use the 12:30-1:00pm for team meetings. 18-Sept-2014 Phys 192 Lecture 3 2 Team Competition • Name that logical fallacy • Teams get 20 seconds to identify the logical fallacy in each case. • Write your answers on a piece of paper. – Keep your own score. • There are 11 cases. 18-Sept-2014 Phys 192 Lecture 3 3 1. Looking for “judgement day” “The science of astronomy states that the speed of planet Mars has been decreasing in its course toward the eastern direction in the few past weeks to the level we notice the ‘waver’ between the east and the west…and on Wednesday the 30th of July (2004?) the planet movement stopped going toward the eastern direction. Then in the months of August and September…Mars changed its course in the opposite direction to the West – and that until the end of September…which means the sun will rise now from the west on Mars!! And this weird phenomena of the opposite movement called ‘Retrograde motion’ most scientists state that all the planets will go through the same once at least and our planet Earth is one of them. Planet Earth will move in the opposite direction some day and the sun will rise from the west!!” 18-Sept-2014 Phys 192 Lecture 3 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sagan's Baloney Detection
    Carl Sagan’s “Baloney Detection Kit” In his 1995 book The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, Carl Sagan provides a list of 20 common fallacies to watch out for (especially in religion and politics). He covers them in detail; this is just the short list: 1 ad hominem (Latin "to the man", attacking the arguer, not the argument) 2 argument from authority 3 argument from adverse consequences 4 appeal to ignorance (the claim that if it's not proved false it must be true; used a lot by creationists) 5 special pleading (often to rescue a proposition in deep rhetorical trouble) 6 begging the question (AKA assuming the answer) 7 observational selection (AKA enumeration of favorable circumstances) 8 statistics of small numbers (related to #7) 9 misunderstanding of the nature of statistics 10 inconsistency 11 non sequitur (Latin "it does not follow") 12 post hoc, ergo propter hoc (Latin "after that, therefore because of that") 13 meaningless question 14 excluded middle (AKA false dichotomy; used a lot in politics) 15 short-term vs. long-term (subset of #14 but Sagan said it's important enough to warrant special attention) 16 slippery slope (related to #14 as well) 17 confusion of correlation and causation 18 straw man 19 suppressed evidence (AKA half-truths) 20 weasel words Michael Shermer, editor and publisher of Skeptic magazine and author of The Borderlands of Science, supplemented Sagan’s list with a set of 10 questions (http://homepages.wmich.edu/%7Ekorista/baloney.html) to ask about truth claims: 1 How reliable is the source
    [Show full text]
  • Carl Sagan: the People’S Astronomer by David Morrison, NASA, Ames Research Center
    Carl Sagan: The People’s Astronomer by David Morrison, NASA, Ames Research Center Introduction Carl Sagan was the world’s best known scientist in the late 20th century, serving as our guide to the planets during the golden age of solar system exploration. He was both a visionary and a committed defender of rational scientific thinking. For a time, he transcended the usual categories of academics to become a true celebrity. His life illustrates both the advantages (wealth, fame, access to the seats of power) and burdens (loss of privacy, stress, criticism from academic colleagues) this status implies. Sagan was propelled on his academic and public careers by a wealth of talent, a large share of good luck, and an intensely focused drive to succeed. His lifelong quest was to understand the universe, especially our planetary system, and to communicate the thrill of scientific discovery to others. A natural teacher, he loved to explain things and never made a questioner feel stupid for asking. Although Sagan had broad intellectual interests, his pursuit of his career left little time for other activities: he did not play golf or follow sports, take up painting or cooking or photography, sing or play a musical instrument, join a church or synagogue, or watch much television or movies. His first two wives complained that he devoted insufficient time to his marriage or his children (1). It is perhaps a matter of personal taste whether we attribute this drive to personal ego or a genuine commitment to educate and inspire people about science. Undoubtedly there were elements of both motivations present.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Age Case Study on Contested Models of Science
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE QI EQUALS MC-SQUARED: A NEW AGE CASE STUDY ON CONTESTED MODELS OF SCIENCE, SPIRITUALITY AND THE ACQUISITION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Garrett Sadler December 2014 The thesis of Garrett Sadler is approved: _________________________________________ ______________ Dr. Christina von Mayrhauser Date _________________________________________ ______________ Dr. Sabina Magliocco Date _________________________________________ ______________ Dr. Kimberly Kirner, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Acknowledgements There are many people to whom I am endlessly in debt for their guidance, wisdom, expertise, support, sympathy, counseling, therapy (lots and lots of therapy), and—simply put—genuine care for my success over the course of this project and, more generally, my graduate career. Thank you, Drs. Christina von Mayrhauser, Sabina Magliocco, and Kimberly Kirner. Each of you has played a significant role in developing and honing my skills and intellect in anthropological thought and, perhaps more significantly, in being a good person. Additionally, I would like to single out two students without whose friendship (more accurately, mentorship) I would not have completed this degree: Victoria Weaver and Kevin Zemlicka. Victoria and Kevin, I am honored to have you as such dear friends. From our mutual experiences in this program, I know that our bond is permanent. Please be prepared to keep assisting me with my many neuroses in the future. To all of those mentioned above, know that you have instilled in me aspects of character, personality, identity (or whatever the hell you want to call it) that will remain with me eternally.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Pseudoscience to Teach Scientific Thinking
    PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE published: 17 April 2014 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00336 Hauntings, homeopathy, and the Hopkinsville Goblins: using pseudoscience to teach scientific thinking Rodney Schmaltz1* and Scott O. Lilienfeld 2 1 Department of Psychology, MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB, Canada 2 Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA Edited by: With access to information ever increasing, it is essential that students acquire the skills to Gretchen Maria Reevy, California distinguish fact from fiction. By incorporating examples of pseudoscience into lectures, State University, East Bay, USA instructors can provide students with the tools needed to understand the difference Reviewed by: between scientific and pseudoscientific or paranormal claims. We discuss examples Melinda J. Mollette, Gwinnett County Public Schools, USA involving psychics, ghosts, aliens, and other phenomena in relation to scientific thinking. E. Michael Nussbaum, University of In light of research literature demonstrating that presenting and dispelling scientific Nevada, Las Vegas, USA misconceptions in the classroom is an effective means of countering non-scientific or *Correspondence: pseudoscientific beliefs, we provide examples of pseudoscience that can be used to help Rodney Schmaltz, Department of students acquire healthy skepticism while avoiding cynicism. Psychology, MacEwan University, City Centre Campus, 6-370, 10700-104 Keywords: scientific thinking, skepticism, pseudoscience, teaching resources, introductory psychology Avenue, Edmonton, AB, Canada e-mail: [email protected] From Dr. Oz promoting homeopathy to Deepak Chopra extolling same time, there is hope. Researchers have found that short-term the virtues of quantum healing, students are bombarded with skeptical thinking improves among students who have had direct questionable claims that require careful examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Baloney Detection Kit
    Baloney Detection Kit Michael Shermer, executive director of the Skeptic Society and founding publisher of Skeptic Magazine has an informative video on YouTube. He takes people through what Carl Sagan dreamt up for those struggling for common sense guidelines for determining when something is credible or not in terms of science. He highlights eight questions that can serve as guides to what is and isn't science. They include: 1. How reliable is the source of the claim? 2. Does the source make similar claims? 3. Have the claims been verified by somebody else? 4. Does this fit with the way the world works? 5. Has anyone tried to disprove the claim? 6. Where does the preponderance of evidence point? 7. Is the claimant(s) playing by the rules of science? 8. Does verifiable evidence exist? 9. Are personal beliefs driving the claim? Below are possible areas that may or may not be pseudoscience, protoscience, or non-science. Choose a topic that you would like to reach and test against the Baloney Detection Kit as best as you can. Let us know if the think the topic is "baloney", and if it’s not science, does it guarantee that it’s not true? What about if it is science? Does it mean that it’s 100 percent certain, or is the knowledge tentative, at least in the realm of science? Astrology Homeopathy Accupuncture Telepathy Cold Fusion The Bermuda Triangle Over the counter diet pills Hypnosis Vaccines & Autism Prenology Flu Shots Parapsychology GMO Food Chiropractic Medicine Polygraphy Magnetic Therapy Handwriting analysis Ufology Vaccines Intelligent design Great Spaghetti Monster Life on other planets Cryonics Pluto's reclassification as a dwarf planet Human evolution Earth’s beginning Source: The Baloney Detection Kit was an idea of the late scientist, Carl Sagan, and today is part of a video series produced by the Richard Dawkins Foundation and available on YouTube (https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNSHZG9blQQ, Length: 14 minutes) Baloney Detection Kit Copyright 2015.
    [Show full text]