DOCSLIB.ORG

The Bolsheviks and the National Question, 1917-23 Studies in Russia and East Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Bolsheviks and the National Question, 1917-23 Studies in Russia and East Europe THE BOLSHEVIKS AND THE NATIONAL QUESTION, 1917-23 STUDIES IN RUSSIA AND EAST EUROPE This series includes books on general, political, historical, economic and cultural themes relating to Russia and East Europe written or edited by members of the School of Slavonic and East European Studies in the University of London, or by authors working in association with the School. Recent titles include: Roger Bartlett and Karen Schonwiilder (editors) THE GERMAN LANDS AND EASTERN EUROPE Essays on the History of their Social, Cultural and Political Relations John Channon (editor) POLITICS, SOCIETY AND STALINISM IN THE USSR Geoffrey Hosking and Robert Service (editors) RUSSIAN NATIONALISM, PAST AND PRESENT Krystyna Iglicka and Keith Sword (editors) THE CHALLENGE OF EAST-WEST MIGRATION FOR POLAND Marja Nissinen LATVIA'S TRANSITION TO A MARKET ECONOMY Political Determinants of Economic Reform Policy Jeremy Smith THE BOLSHEVIKS AND THE NATIONAL QUESTION, 1917-23 Jeanne Sutherland SCHOOLING IN THE NEW RUSSIA Innovation and Change, 1984-95 Keith Sword DEPORTATION AND EXILE Poles in the Soviet Union, 1939-48 Studies in Russia and East Europe Series Standing Order ISBN 978-0-333-71018-0 (outside North America only) You can receive future titles in this series as they are published by placing a standing order. Please contact your bookseller or, in case of difficulty, write to us at the address below with your name and address, the title of the series and the ISBN quoted above. Customer Services Department, Macmillan Distribution Ltd Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG2 l 6XS, England The Bolsheviks and the National Question, 1917-23 Jeremy Smith Researcher and Lecturer in Soviet History Ren val! Institute University of Helsinki ~ in association with ~ PALGRAVEMACMILLAN First published in Great Britain 1999 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndrnills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-349-40610-4 ISBN 978-0-230-37737-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230377370 First published in the United States of America 1999 by ST. MARTIN'S PRESS, INC., Scholarly and Reference Division, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 ISBN 978-0-312-22026-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Smith, Jeremy, 1964-- The Bolsheviks and the national question, 1917-23 I Jeremy Smith. p. cm. - (Studies in Russia and East Europe) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-312-22026-6 (cloth) 1. Soviet Union-Ethnic relations. 2. Soviet Union-Politics and government-1917-1945. I. Title. II. Series. DK33.S55 1999 323.1'47'09041----dc2l 98-41177 CIP © Jeremy Smith I 999 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1999 978-0-333-72759-1 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WlP 9HE. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. 109876543 2 l 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 ()() 99 To Hanna Contents List of Tables ix Preface and Acknowledgements x List ofAbbreviations, Russian Terms and Organisations xv Note on Transliteration xvii Introduction 1 2 Marxists, Bolsheviks and the National Question 7 From Marx to Lenin 7 The Bolsheviks before 1917 14 The Bolsheviks after 1917 19 3 The Case for National Autonomy - Causes and Processes 29 The People's Commissariat of Nationality Affairs (Narkomnats) 30 National Units in the Red Army 34 The National Commissariats and Departments of Narkomnats 39 The Muslim Commissariat 41 National Territorial Autonomy 43 The Turkestan Soviet Autonomous Republic 45 Bashkir and Tatar Autonomy 47 The Spread of Autonomous Republics and Regions 50 Autonomy in Transcaucasia 55 4 Building Nationhood - Borders and State Structures 66 Transcaucasia's Internal Borders 69 Belorussia's Borders 70 The Internal Borders of Central Asia 78 Migration and Resettlement 85 Problems of Autonomy 93 The Bashkir Crisis, 1919-20 94 Conflict in Turkestan, 1921 99 The People's Soviet Republics 101 The Independent Soviet Socialist Republics 103 Economic Development 104 Vil viii Contents 5 'Korenizatsiia' - National Communist Leaderships 108 The Jewish Socialist Parties 109 The Ukrainian Borotbists 116 Muslim National Communists 125 Communist Schools and Universities 136 6 'Cultural Autonomy' - Education, Language and Culture 144 Education of National Minorities 145 Language Planning 162 National Culture 168 Religion 170 7 The Georgian Crisis and the Formation of the Soviet Union 172 Competing Plans for the Organisation of Relations between the Soviet Republics 173 'Federalism', 'Confederalism' or 'Autonomy'? 175 Stalin's 'Autonomisation' Project 180 The Georgian Affair 189 8 The Twelfth Party Congress and the Sultan-Galiev Affair 213 The Twelfth Party Congress 213 The Sultan-Galiev Affair 228 9 Conclusion 239 Notes 243 Bibliography 265 Index 271 List of Tables 4.1 Population of Autonomous Republics and Regions in 1923 by Nationality 91 4.2 Nationality of Workers in Each Republic and Autonomous Region of the USSR in 1926 105 5.1 Students at the Ten Main Communist Universities on 1 January 1924 138 5.2 Members and Candidate Members of the Communist Party, Compared to the Size of Each Nationality as a Proportion of the Entire Population of the USSR in 1926/1927 140 5.3 Proportion of CPSU Members and Candidate Members of the Titular Nationality in the National Republics and Regions in 1927 141 5.4 Percentage of Nationals on Raion, Volost, Okrug and Uezd Ispolkoms in 1927 142 6.1 Native Language Education For Non-Russian Children in the Republic of Their Own Titular Nationality in December 1927 157 6.2 National Language and Mixed Language Education for Children of the Titular Nationality in the Autonomous Regions in December 1927 157 6.3 Four-Year Schools in the Belorussian SSR in December 1927 158 6.4 Seven-Year Schools in the Belorussian SSR in December 1927 158 6.5 Language of Instruction for Children Belonging to National Minorities, December 1927 (%) 159 6.6 The Growth of Yiddish Schools in Belorussia, Ukraine and the RSFSR in the 1920s 162 6.7 Proportion of Turko-Tatar Literates understanding the New Turkic Alphabet in 1928/29 167 ix Preface and Acknowledgements In October 1991 I began work on the national policies of the early Bolshevik regime which culminated in the creation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Within a matter of days the USSR had started to disintegrate, and within months all of the Union Republics which had entered into the composition of the federal state in 1923 had declared independence and constituted themselves as separate states. While I was lucky in that the timing of these events contributed additional relevance to my research, it had been clear for several years that the national question was far from being solved in the Soviet Union, in spite of the claims of ex-President Mikhail Gorbachev to the contrary. Taking their lead from the three Baltic Republics which had remained independent until the Second World War, the non­ Russian republics had provided one of the most potent sources of opposition to Soviet Communist rule in the 1980s. At the time it was commonplace to describe the collapse of the Soviet Union as the inevitable fate of a state which had been put together by force after 1917, with little or no recognition of the aspira­ tions of the smaller nationalities of what had formerly been the Russian Empire. This interpretation owes much to the ground­ breaking work of Richard Pipes, whose The Formation of the Soviet Union: Communism and Nationalism, 1917-1923 (Cambridge, Mass., 1954) has remained the most influential treatment of this question to date. While the work of other scholars in this field, such as Helene Carrere d'Encausse and E.H. Carr is of no less value, it is Pipes' account which has left its mark on all the subsequent historiography. In Pipes' view, the Ukrainians, Belorussians, Georgians, Azeris, Armenians and Moslems of the Russian borderlands had expressed an unequivocal desire for independence by setting up their own states in the wake of the revolutions of 1917. It was only by armed conquest that the Bolsheviks were able to extend their rule beyond Central Russia to cover most of the area of the old empire. Any concessions made to the nationalities were purely tactical: 'Lenin looked upon national problems as something to exploit, and not as something to x Preface and Acknowledgements XI solve' (page 49.) On this reading, nothing positive can be found in the Bolsheviks' approach to the national question. Such an interpretation is inadequate. It ignores, or greatly simplifies, the complexity of Bolshevik and Marxist debate on the national question. It provides no adequate explanation of the great deal of effort put into developing national education and culture, and into the promotion of non-Russian communist cadres. It implies that the federal structures of both the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) and the Soviet Union were purely cosmetic, and existed only as a sop to the national movements (which Pipes admits were weak and ineffective). An examination of both the new materials recently released from the archives in Moscow, and of documentation previously available, reveals a quite different picture: while the Bolsheviks had no blueprint for dealing with the national question, and their policies evolved haphazardly and often fortuitously, numer­ ous influences played their part in the development of a coherent set of policies which sought to promote, rather than deny, national distinctiveness.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • War Communism and Bolshevik Ideals" Is Devoted to a Case I N Point: the Dispute Over the Motivation of War Communism (The Name Given T O
    TITLE : WAR COMMUNISM AND BOLSHEVIK IDEAL S AUTHOR : LARS T . LIH THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEA N RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION : ' CONTRACTOR : Wellesley Colleg e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Lars T. Li h COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 807-1 9 DATE : January 25, 199 4 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded b y Council Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within th e Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, o r make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without th e written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f information Act 5 U.S. C. 552, or other applicable law. The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U. S. Department of State under Title VIII (th e Soviet-Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983) . The analysis and interpretations contained in th e report are those of the author. NCSEER NOTE This interpretive analysis of War Communism (1918-1921) may be of interest to those wh o anticipate further decline in the Russian economy and contemplate the possible purposes an d policies of a more authoritarian regime .
    [Show full text]
  • From Proletarian Internationalism to Populist
    from proletarian internationalism to populist russocentrism: thinking about ideology in the 1930s as more than just a ‘Great Retreat’ David Brandenberger (Harvard/Yale) • [email protected] The most characteristic aspect of the newly-forming ideology... is the downgrading of socialist elements within it. This doesn’t mean that socialist phraseology has disappeared or is disappearing. Not at all. The majority of all slogans still contain this socialist element, but it no longer carries its previous ideological weight, the socialist element having ceased to play a dynamic role in the new slogans.... Props from the historic past – the people, ethnicity, the motherland, the nation and patriotism – play a large role in the new ideology. –Vera Aleksandrova, 19371 The shift away from revolutionary proletarian internationalism toward russocentrism in interwar Soviet ideology has long been a source of scholarly controversy. Starting with Nicholas Timasheff in 1946, some have linked this phenomenon to nationalist sympathies within the party hierarchy,2 while others have attributed it to eroding prospects for world This article builds upon pieces published in Left History and presented at the Midwest Russian History Workshop during the past year. My eagerness to further test, refine and nuance this reading of Soviet ideological trends during the 1930s stems from the fact that two book projects underway at the present time pivot on the thesis advanced in the pages that follow. I’m very grateful to the participants of the “Imagining Russia” conference for their indulgence. 1 The last line in Russian reads: “Bol’shuiu rol’ v novoi ideologii igraiut rekvizity istoricheskogo proshlogo: narod, narodnost’, rodina, natsiia, patriotizm.” V.
    [Show full text]
  • Communist Parties Have Inherited from Lenin and Other Great Bolsheviks an Ideal-Logical Paradigm
    The Bolshevik Ideal-logical Paradi!! Communist parties have inherited from Lenin and other great bolsheviks an ideal-logical paradigm. In terms of this paradigm the bolsheviks understand themselves and the world, which they try to disqualify ideologically and to change through revolutionary activity. Apart from the ideal of a communist society, the following ideas exerted key influence on the Bolsheviks' (self)understanding: proletarian revolution; a party of (professional) revolutionaries organized in a democratic-centralist manner; dictatorship of the proletariat; the party as the representative of the objective and historical interests of the proletariat; the transition period between capitalism and communism. As Marxists the Bolsheviks faced the problem of how to explain to them­ selves and others the possibility of proletarian, socialist revolution in backward Russia. The idea of a centralized party of professional revolution­ aries did not suffice; they needed a radical revision of the Marxist vision of revolution. This revision transformed a revolutionary philosophical-social theory into a revolutionary ideal-logy. Admittedly, Marx himself was ambivalent: He'saw a real chance for the revolution and the subsequent development of a new society in developed capitalism, but from time to time he lost his patience, hoping that the revolution would soon break out even though capitalism was still i rather undeveloped. Characteristically, Bolshevik ideal-logues believed tliat Marx's goals could be achieved under radicallY changed conditions and through radically 1 2 Changed means.* One could almost say that revolution sets only those goals it cannot aChieve. Two ideas were of key import~nce for the Bolshevik ideal-logical revision of Marx's concept of revolution: the weakest link of imperialism and the permanent revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Strategy and Planning: the Soviet Experience
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: National Economic Planning Volume Author/Editor: Max F. Millikan, editor Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-310-7 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/mill67-1 Conference Date: Publication Date: 1967 Chapter Title: Development Strategy and Planning: The Soviet Experience Chapter Author(s): Alexander Erlich Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1425 Chapter pages in book: (p. 233 - 278) Development Strategy and Planning: The Soviet Experience ALEXANDER ERLICH COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY AND RUSSIAN RESEARCH CENTER, HARVARD UNIVERSITY introduction The First Soviet Five Year Plan was officially launched almost exactly thirty-five years ago. The hallmarks of the period that was ushered in therewith were rapid extension of social ownership beyond the limits of the modern urban sector, with the full-scale collectivization of agri- culture virtually completed by the mid-thirties; the establishment of an all-embracing system of centralized planning; and a remarkably high over-all rate of economic growth. The architects of the system have been insistent in postulating a three-way connection between these ele- ments. Without centralized planning, it was argued, there would be no comparable rates of growth; without extensive social ownership no effective centralized planning would be possible; and without thorough- going modernization and concentration of production in the wake of rapid economic growth, both planning and social ownership would lack a firm basis and would eventually either be subverted from within or destroyed from without.1 NoTE: The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the Russian Research Center of Harvard University and of the Russian Institute of Columbia University in the preparation of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • State Building in Revolutionary Ukraine
    STATE BUILDING IN REVOLUTIONARY UKRAINE Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/31/17 3:49 PM This page intentionally left blank Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/31/17 3:49 PM STEPHEN VELYCHENKO STATE BUILDING IN REVOLUTIONARY UKRAINE A Comparative Study of Governments and Bureaucrats, 1917–1922 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Toronto Buffalo London Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/31/17 3:49 PM © University of Toronto Press Incorporated 2011 Toronto Buffalo London www.utppublishing.com Printed in Canada ISBN 978-1-4426-4132-7 Printed on acid-free, 100% post-consumer recycled paper with vegetable- based inks. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Velychenko, Stephen State building in revolutionary Ukraine: a comparative study of governments and bureaucrats, 1917–1922/Stephen Velychenko. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4426-4132-7 1. Ukraine – Politics and government – 1917–1945. 2. Public adminstration – Ukraine – History – 20th century. 3. Nation-building – Ukraine – History – 20th century 4. Comparative government. I. Title DK508.832.V442011 320.9477'09041 C2010-907040-2 The research for this book was made possible by University of Toronto Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grants, by the Katedra Foundation, and the John Yaremko Teaching Fellowship. This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, through the Aid to Scholarly Publications Programme, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. University of Toronto Press acknowledges the fi nancial assistance to its publishing program of the Canada Council for the Arts and the Ontario Arts Council. University of Toronto Press acknowledges the fi nancial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Book Fund for its publishing activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Russia and the Formation of the Soviet Union
    CLASSROOM COUNTRY PROFILES Revolution in Russia and the Formation of the Soviet Union The Russian Revolution often refers to two events that took place in 1917. The first, known as the February Revolution, forced Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate and led to the formation of a provisional government. During the second event, commonly known as the October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution, Vla- dimir Lenin’s Bolshevik Party seized power and began seven decades of one-party rule. Some scholars and Soviet critics have argued that the second event was actually a coup by Lenin and his supporters and not a true revolution. The Russian Empire in 1914. Date confusion—The February Revolution actually In the early 1900s, cracks were beginning to appear in the tsar’s control took place in early March. Because the Russian Em- over the Russian Empire. An attempted revolution in 1905, which saw pire followed the Julian Calendar, which is 13 days mass worker strikes and peasant revolts, shook the monarchy and forced behind the Gregorian Calendar, the events are referred Tsar Nicholas II to implement political reform, including the establishment to as the February Revolution. Likewise, the October of a parliament and a new constitution. Revolution actually took place in early November. Reform temporarily quieted the unrest, but the new policies proved inef- Soviet—The word means “council” in Russian. Soviets fective and the parliament, known as the State Duma, was largely unable were workers’ councils made up of various socialist to override the Tsar’s decrees. parties at the end of the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Culture: the End of Russian Intelligentsia
    Russian Culture Center for Democratic Culture 2012 Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia Dmitri N. Shalin University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture Part of the Asian History Commons, Cultural History Commons, European History Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, Political History Commons, Slavic Languages and Societies Commons, and the Social History Commons Repository Citation Shalin, D. N. (2012). Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia. In Dmitri N. Shalin, 1-68. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture/6 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Article in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Article has been accepted for inclusion in Russian Culture by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia Dmitri Shalin No group cheered louder for Soviet reform, had a bigger stake in perestroika, and suffered more in its aftermath than did the Russian intelligentsia. Today, nearly a decade after Mikhail Gorbachev unveiled his plan to reform Soviet society, the mood among Russian intellectuals is decidedly gloomy.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ- the Beginning of the ХХІ Century
    NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LIFE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE OF UKRAINE FACULTY OF THE HUMANITIES AND PEDAGOGY Department of History and Political Sciences N. KRAVCHENKO History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ- the beginning of the ХХІ century Textbook for students of English-speaking groups Kyiv 2017 UDК 93/94 (477) BBК: 63.3 (4 Укр) К 77 Recommended for publication by the Academic Council of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine (Protocol № 3, on October 25, 2017). Reviewers: Kostylyeva Svitlana Oleksandrivna, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History of the National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»; Vyhovskyi Mykola Yuriiovych, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of the Faculty of Historical Education of the National Pedagogical Drahomanov University Вilan Serhii Oleksiiovych, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History and Political Sciences of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine. Аristova Natalia Oleksandrivna, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of English Philology of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine. Author: PhD, Associate Professor Nataliia Borysivna Kravchenko К 77 Kravchenko N. B. History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ - the beginning of the ХХІ century. Textbook for students of English-speaking groups. / Kravchenko N. B. – Куiv: Еditing and Publishing Division NUBiP of Ukraine, 2017. – 412 р. ISBN 978-617-7396-79-5 The textbook-reference covers the historical development of Ukraine Statehood in the ХХ- at the beginning of the ХХІ century. The composition contains materials for lectures, seminars and self-study. It has general provisions, scientific and reference materials - personalities, chronology, terminology, documents and manual - set of tests, projects and recommended literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Iuliia Kysla
    Rethinking the Postwar Era: Soviet Ukrainian Writers Under Late Stalinism, 1945-1949 by Iuliia Kysla A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics University of Alberta © Iuliia Kysla, 2018 Abstract This dissertation advances the study of late Stalinism, which has until recently been regarded as a bizarre appendage to Stalin’s rule, and aims to answer the question of whether late Stalinism was a rupture with or continuation of its prewar precursor. I analyze the reintegration of Ukrainian writers into the postwar Soviet polity and their adaptation to the new realities following the dramatic upheavals of war. Focusing on two parallel case studies, Lviv and Kyiv, this study explores how the Soviet regime worked with members of the intelligentsia in these two cities after 1945, at a time when both sides were engaged in “identification games.” This dissertation demonstrates that, despite the regime’s obsession with control, there was some room for independent action on the part of Ukrainian writers and other intellectuals. Authors exploited gaps in Soviet discourse to reclaim agency, which they used as a vehicle to promote their own cultural agendas. Unlike the 1930s, when all official writers had to internalize the tropes of Soviet culture, in the postwar years there was some flexibility in an author’s ability to accept or reject the Soviet system. Moreover, this dissertation suggests that Stalin’s postwar cultural policy—unlike the strategies of the 1930s, which relied predominantly on coercive tactics—was defined mainly by discipline by humiliation, which often involved bullying and threatening members of the creative intelligentsia.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    MAOISM-ITS ORIGINS, BACKGROUND, AND OUTLOOK Isaac Deutscher WHAT does Maoism stand for? What does it represent as a political idea and as a current in contemporary communism? The need to clarify these questions has become all the more urgent because Maoism is now openly competing with other communist schools of thought for inter- national recognition. Yet before entering this competition Maoism had existed as a current, and then as the dominant trend, of Chinese communism for thirty to thirty-five years. It is under its banner that the main forces of the Chinese revolution waged the most protracted civil war in modern history; and that they won their victory in 1949, making the greatest single breach in world capitalism since the October Revolu- tion, and freeing the Soviet Union from isolation. It is hardly surprising that Maoism should at last advance politically beyond its national . boundaries and claim world-wide attention to its ideas. What is surprising is that it has not done so earlier and that it has for so long remained closed within the confines of its national experience. Maoism presents in this respect a striking contrast with Leninism. The latter also existed at first as a purely Russian school of thought; but not for long. In 1915, after the collapse of the Second International, Lenin was already the central figure in the movement for the Third International, its initiator and inspirer-Bolshevism, as a faction in the Russian Social Democratic Party, was not much older then than a decade. Before that the Bolsheviks, like other Russian socialists, had lived intensely with all the problems of international Marxism, absorbed all its experience, participated in all its controversies, and felt bound to it with unbreakable ties of intellectual, moral, and political solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Yugoslav Ideology and Its Importance to the Soviet Bloc: an Analysis
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-1967 Yugoslav Ideology and Its Importance to the Soviet Bloc: An Analysis Christine Deichsel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Deichsel, Christine, "Yugoslav Ideology and Its Importance to the Soviet Bloc: An Analysis" (1967). Master's Theses. 3240. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3240 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. YUGOSLAV IDEOLOGY AND ITS IMPORTANCE TO THE SOVIET BLOC: AN ANALYSIS by Christine Deichsel A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo., Michigan April 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In writing this thesis I have benefited from the advice and encouragement of Professors George Klein and William A. Ritchie. My thanks go to them and the other members of my Committee, namely Professors Richard J. Richardson and Alan Isaak. Furthermore, I wish to ex­ press my appreciation to all the others at Western Michi­ gan University who have given me much needed help and encouragement. The award of an assistantship and the intellectual guidance and stimulation from the faculty of the Department of Political Science have made my graduate work both a valuable experience and a pleasure.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 37, May-June, 2014
    The Internationalist No. 37 May-June 2014 50¢ Get the Hell Out of Afghanistan and Iraq – And Stay Out! From Ukraine to Middle East: U.S. Imperialism Strikes Out Instigating Ethnic/Religious War in the Name of “Democracy” JUNE 20 – When a right-wing cabal of pro-European Union capitalists, Ukrainian nationalists and fascists seized power in Reuters Kiev in a coup d’état at the end of Febru- ary, their backers in Western capitals hailed this supposed victory for “democracy” and setback for Russia. But the Kremlin’s swift and bloodless takeover of Crimea just days later threw the U.S. and European imperial- ists for a loop. When pro-Russian rebels rose up in eastern Ukraine a month later, quickly gaining popular support, Washington called on its Ukrainian puppets to crack down. But instead of stifling unrest, the military offen- sive provoked massive opposition in the east. A May 2 massacre of dozens of anti-Ki- ev demonstrators by fascists and Ukrainian ethnic nationalists in Odessa (see article, page 12) sealed the division of the country in blood. On May 11, hundreds of thousands turned out in the Russian-speaking eastern oblasts (districts) of Donetsk, Luhansk and Mariupol to vote in a referendum for home rule. The May 25 presidential election (boycotted in the east) solved nothing, and when the new president, Petro Poroshenko, stepped up the “Anti-Terrorist Operation,” indiscriminately shelling residential areas, it only intensified the overwhelming hatred of the Ukrainian nationalist Kiev regime. On top of this disastrous situation in Fascist-led protesters set barricades aflame in Kiev’s Independence Square, 20 February 2014.
    [Show full text]