DOCSLIB.ORG

Kissimmee Prairie Preserve State Park 2018 Unit Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kissimmee Prairie Preserve State Park 2018 Unit Management Plan Rick Scott FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Environmental Protection Lt Governor Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 CommonwealthBoulevard Noah Valenstein Tallahassee,Aorida 32399-3000 Secretary October 19, 2018 Mr. Steven Cutshaw Division of Recreation and Parks Departmentof Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard,MS 525 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 RE: Kissimmee Prairie Preserve State Park- Lease No. 4166 DearMr. Cutshaw: On October 19, 2018, the Acquisition and Restoration Council (ARC) recommended approval of the Kissimmee Prairie Preserve State Park management plan. Therefore, Division of State Lands, Office of Environmental Services, acting as agent for the Board of Trustees of the InternalImprovement Trust Fund, hereby approves the Kissimmee Prairie Preserve State Park managementplan. The next management planupdate is due October 19, 2028. Pursuantto s. 253.034(5)(a), F.S., each management plan is required to "describe both short-termand long-termmanagement goals, andinclude measurable objectives to achieve those goals. Short-termgoals shall be achievable within a 2-year planning period, and long-term goals shall be achievable within a 10-year planning period." Upon completion of short-term goals, please submit a signedletter identifying categories, goals, and results with attached methodology to the Division of State Lands, Officeof Environmental Services. Pursuant to s. 259.032(8)(g), F.S., by July 1 of each year, each governmentalagency and each private entity designated to managelands shall report to the Secretaryof Environmental Protection, via the Division of State Lands, on the progress of funding, staffing,and resource management of every projectfor which the agency or entity is responsible. Pursuantto s. 259.036(2), F.S., management areas that exceed 1,000 acres in size, shall be scheduled fora land management review at least every 5 years. Pursuant to s. 259.032, F.S., and Chapter 18-2.021, F.A.C., management plans for areas less than 160 acres may be handledin accordance with the negative response process. This process requires small managementplans andmanagement plan amendments be submitted to the Division of State Lands forreview, and the Acquisition and Restoration Kissimmee Prairie Preserve State Park Approved Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks January 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 8 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 8 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 9 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ............................................................................ 10 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 15 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 15 Topography .................................................................................. 15 Geology ....................................................................................... 16 Soils ............................................................................................ 16 Minerals ....................................................................................... 19 Hydrology .................................................................................... 19 Natural Communities (FNAI) ........................................................... 22 Imperiled Species ......................................................................... 42 Exotic and Nuisance Species ........................................................... 52 Special Natural Features ................................................................ 60 Cultural Resources ............................................................................ 60 Condition Assessment .................................................................... 61 Level of Significance ...................................................................... 61 Prehistoric and Historic Archaeological Sites ..................................... 61 Historic Structures ........................................................................ 64 Collections ................................................................................... 64 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ................................................. 67 Management Goals, Objectives, and Actions ......................................... 67 Natural Resource Management ........................................................... 68 Hydrological Management .............................................................. 68 Natural Communities Management .................................................. 70 Imperiled Species Management ...................................................... 73 Exotic Species Management ........................................................... 76 Cultural Resource Management .......................................................... 77 Special Management Considerations .................................................... 78 Timber Management Analysis ......................................................... 78 Wilderness Preserve ...................................................................... 79 Arthropod Control Plan ................................................................... 79 i Additional Considerations ............................................................... 79 Resource Management Schedule ......................................................... 80 Land Management Review ................................................................. 80 LAND USE COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 83 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS .................................................................... 83 Existing Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 86 Planned Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 87 Florida Greenways and Trail System .................................................... 89 PROPERTY ANALYSIS ........................................................................ 90 Recreation Resource Elements ............................................................ 90 Land Area .................................................................................... 90 Water Area ................................................................................... 90 Shoreline ..................................................................................... 90 Natural Scenery ............................................................................ 91 Significant Habitat ......................................................................... 91 Natural Features ........................................................................... 91 Archaeological and Historic Features ................................................ 91 Assessment of Use ............................................................................ 91 Past Uses ..................................................................................... 91 Future Land Use and Zoning ........................................................... 92 Current Recreation Use and Visitor Programs .................................... 92 Other Uses ................................................................................... 93 Protected Zones ............................................................................ 93 Wilderness Preserve ...................................................................... 93 Existing Facilities .............................................................................. 94 Recreation Facilities ....................................................................... 94 Support Facilities .......................................................................... 94 CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN ........................................................... 98 Potential Uses .................................................................................. 98 Public Access and Recreational Opportunities .................................... 98 Proposed Facilities .......................................................................... 104 Capital Facilities and Infrastructure ............................................... 104 Facilities Development ..................................................................... 106 Recreational Carrying Capacity ......................................................... 107 Optimum Boundary ......................................................................... 108 IMPLEMENTATION COMPONENT MANAGEMENT PROGRESS ...............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats), Idukki District, Kerala, India
    International Journal of Entomology Research International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758 Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 3; Issue 2; March 2018; Page No. 114-120 The moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of vagamon hills (Western Ghats), Idukki district, Kerala, India Pratheesh Mathew, Sekar Anand, Kuppusamy Sivasankaran, Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu* Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract The present study was conducted at Vagamon hill station to evaluate the biodiversity of moths. During the present study, a total of 675 moth specimens were collected from the study area which represented 112 species from 16 families and eight super families. Though much of the species has been reported earlier from other parts of India, 15 species were first records for the state of Kerala. The highest species richness was shown by the family Erebidae and the least by the families Lasiocampidae, Uraniidae, Notodontidae, Pyralidae, Yponomeutidae, Zygaenidae and Hepialidae with one species each. The results of this preliminary study are promising; it sheds light on the unknown biodiversity of Vagamon hills which needs to be strengthened through comprehensive future surveys. Keywords: fauna, lepidoptera, biodiversity, vagamon, Western Ghats, Kerala 1. Introduction Ghats stretches from 8° N to 22° N. Due to increasing Arthropods are considered as the most successful animal anthropogenic activities the montane grasslands and adjacent group which consists of more than two-third of all animal forests face several threats (Pramod et al. 1997) [20]. With a species on earth. Class Insecta comprise about 90% of tropical wide array of bioclimatic and topographic conditions, the forest biomass (Fatimah & Catherine 2002) [10].
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Abejas Del Género Agapostemon (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) Del Estado De Nuevo León, México
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 83: 63-72, 2012 Las abejas del género Agapostemon (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) del estado de Nuevo León, México Bees of the genus Agapostemon (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) of the state of Nuevo León, Mexico Liliana Ramírez-Freire1 , Glafiro José Alanís-Flores1, Ricardo Ayala-Barajas2, Humberto Quiroz -Martínez1 y Carlos GerardoVelazco-Macías3 1Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Cd. Universitaria. Apartado postal 134-F, 66450 San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, México. 2Estación de Biología Chamela (Sede Colima) Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 21, 48980 San Patricio, Jalisco, México. 3Parques y Vida Silvestre. Av. Alfonso Reyes norte s/n, interior del Parque Niños Héroes, lateral izquierda, acceso 3, 64290 Monterrey, Nuevo León, México. [email protected] Resumen. Se realizó un estudio faunístico de las abejas del género Agapostemon (Halictidae) en el estado de Nuevo León, México para conocer las especies presentes, su distribución, relación con la flora y tipos de vegetación del estado. La metodología se basó en la revisión de literatura y de bases de datos de colecciones entomológicas, y en muestreos en campo donde se utilizó red entomológica y platos trampa de colores amarillo, azul, rosa (tonos fluorescentes) y blanco. Sólo en 20 de los 35 muestreos que se realizaron se obtuvieron ejemplares del género. Se recolectaron 11 especies, 2 de las cuales son registros nuevos para el estado (A. nasutus y A. splendens). El 12.31% de los ejemplares se obtuvo mediante el uso de red y el 87.84% con los platos trampa; el color amarillo fue el preferido por las abejas.
    [Show full text]
  • Instituto Tecnológico De Cd. Victoria División De Estudios De Posgrado E Investigación
    SUBSECRETARÍA DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR TECNOLÓGICA INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE CD.VICTORIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- U n a P u b l i c a c i ó n d e l I n s t i t u t o T e c n o l ó g i c o d e C d. V i c t o r i a Volumen 10 No.1 Abril 2013 ISSN 1665-983X CIENCIAS EXACTAS Y NATURALES Tabla de vida de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemíptera: Psyllidae) de la región centro del estado de Tamaulipas, México. C. H. Lugo-Garza, C. A. Salazar-Olivo & O. J. González-Gaona……….…………................1 Estudio preliminar de productividad vegetal estacional en diversos ecosistemas de agostadero en el estado de Tamaulipas, México. Y. A. García-Carbonell, A. Mora-Olivo, A. Moreno-Valdez & O. S. Escamilla- Gallegos…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…7 Nivel de preferencia de plantas en Alta Cimas (Reserva de la Biosfera El Cielo), Tamaulipas, México. S. G. Medellín-Morales, L. Barrientos-Lozano, S. Del Amo-Rodríguez, P. Almaguer-Sierra & C. S. Venegas- Barrera…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..12 Degradación física del suelo por actividades antrópicas en la Zona II de la Cuenca de Burgos, Tamaulipas, México. F. Arias-Miño, M. Espinosa-Ramírez, E. Andrade-Limas, B. Castro-Meza, F. Briones- Encinia & W. Salinas-Castillo………………………………………………………………………………..……….…….25 Contribución al conocimiento de la fauna Orthoptera (Insecta) en la “Sierra de Tamaulipas”, México. L. Barrientos-Lozano, J.B. Ramírez-Núñez, A.Y. Rocha-Sánchez, J.V. Horta-Vega & P. Almaguer-Sierra….…..32 INGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍA Fórmulas para el cálculo de deflexiones en armaduras isostáticas de cuerdas paralelas.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleópteros Saproxílicos De Los Bosques De Montaña En El Norte De La Comunidad De Madrid
    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Coleópteros Saproxílicos de los Bosques de Montaña en el Norte de la Comunidad de Madrid T e s i s D o c t o r a l Juan Jesús de la Rosa Maldonado Licenciado en Ciencias Ambientales 2014 Departamento de Producción Vegetal: Botánica y Protección Vegetal Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Coleópteros Saproxílicos de los Bosques de Montaña en el Norte de la Comunidad de Madrid Juan Jesús de la Rosa Maldonado Licenciado en Ciencias Ambientales Directores: D. Pedro del Estal Padillo, Doctor Ingeniero Agrónomo D. Marcos Méndez Iglesias, Doctor en Biología 2014 Tribunal nombrado por el Magfco. y Excmo. Sr. Rector de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid el día de de 2014. Presidente D. Vocal D. Vocal D. Vocal D. Secretario D. Suplente D. Suplente D. Realizada la lectura y defensa de la Tesis el día de de 2014 en Madrid, en la Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos. Calificación: El Presidente Los Vocales El Secretario AGRADECIMIENTOS A Ángel Quirós, Diego Marín Armijos, Isabel López, Marga López, José Luis Gómez Grande, María José Morales, Alba López, Jorge Martínez Huelves, Miguel Corra, Adriana García, Natalia Rojas, Rafa Castro, Ana Busto, Enrique Gorroño y resto de amigos que puntualmente colaboraron en los trabajos de campo o de gabinete. A la Guardería Forestal de la comarca de Buitrago de Lozoya, por su permanente apoyo logístico. A los especialistas en taxonomía que participaron en la identificación del material recolectado, pues sin su asistencia hubiera sido mucho más difícil finalizar este trabajo.
    [Show full text]
  • FM), 3-9 July, 3-10 September and 10-13 December 1990
    BULLETIN OF THE ALLYN MUSEUM 3621 Bayshore Rd. Sarasota, Florida 34234 Published By Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville, Florida 32611 Number 133 14 June 1991 ISSN-0097-3211 THE BUTTERFLIES OF ANEGADA, BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF A NEW CALISTO (SATYRIDAE) AND A NEW COPAEODES (HESPERIIDAE) ENDEMIC TO THE ISLAND David Spencer Smith Hope Entomological Collections, The University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford, OX! 3PW, England. Lee D. Miller Allyn Museum of Entomology of the Florida Museum of Natural History, 3621 Bay Shore Road, Sarasota, Florida 34234, U.S.A. Faustino KcKenzie Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico, Boulevard del Valle 201, Old San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901, U.S.A. This paper is dedicated to the memory of John Griffith of Jesus College, Oxford. INTRODUCTION Anegada island is the northernmost member of the Lesser Antillean arc, situated at 18" 43'N and 64" 19'W. Its nearest neighbors are Anguilla, about 80 statute miles (127 km} across the Anegada Passage to the east-southeast and Virgin Gorda, about 13 miles (21 km} due south. Whereas the Virgin Islands are generally mountainous, Anegada reaches perhaps 18 ' above mean sea level and much of the island is considerably lower (D 'Arcy, 1975}. It is about 10 miles (16 km} in length, about 15 square miles (39 km'} in area, oriented along the east-west axis and is just over 2 miles (3.5 km} across the widest point (Fig. 16}. From the south coast and into the Anegada Passage to the southeast extends the Horseshoe Reef, long a hazard to navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • NENHC 2013 Oral Presentation Abstracts
    Oral Presentation Abstracts Listed alphabetically by presenting author. Presenting author names appear in bold. Code following abstract refers to session presentation was given in (Day [Sun = Sunday, Mon = Monday] – Time slot [AM1 = early morning session, AM2 = late morning session, PM1 = early afternoon session, PM2 = late afternoon session] – Room – Presentation sequence. For example, Mon-PM1-B-3 indicates: Monday early afternoon session in room B, and presentation was the third in sequence of presentations for that session. Using that information and the overview of sessions chart below, one can see that it was part of the “Species-Specific Management of Invasives” session. Presenters’ contact information is provided in a separate list at the end of this document. Overview of Oral Presentation Sessions SUNDAY MORNING SUNDAY APRIL 14, 2013 8:30–10:00 Concurrent Sessions - Morning I Room A Room B Room C Room D Cooperative Regional (Multi- Conservation: state) In-situ Breeding Ecology of Ant Ecology I Working Together to Reptile/Amphibian Songbirds Reintroduce and Conservation Establish Species 10:45– Concurrent Sessions - Morning II 12:40 Room A Room B Room C Room D Hemlock Woolly Bird Migration and Adelgid and New Marine Ecology Urban Ecology Ecology England Forests 2:00–3:52 Concurrent Sessions - Afternoon I Room A Room B Room C Room D A Cooperative Effort to Identify and Impacts on Natural History and Use of Telemetry for Report Newly Biodiversity of Trends in Northern Study of Aquatic Emerging Invasive Hydraulic Fracturing Animals
    [Show full text]
  • The Lily Pad
    The Lily Pad certain flower seeds because of the July Program shape of their beak. Eleanor C. Foerste, Faculty, Natural They also found this was true of the July 2013 Resources, UF/IFAS Osceola County squirrels and the mice we saw. Volume 7, Issue 5 Extension will present on Invasive species - Air potato and the One young boy just could not stop biocontrol air potato beetle as a himself from reaching over to collect management tool. a few seeds for himself to take home to his own garden! His chosen plant? In the Community Dune sunflower. A native plant by Jenny Welch member in the making. The purpose of the Florida Native Plant Interesting that our class was about Society is to promote the preservation, Sandy Webb and I were asked to birds yet it still came back around to conservation, and restoration of the native help out at Bok Tower Summer native plants… plants and native plant communities of Camp Program. We were there for Florida. "Bountiful Birds" program. As I always say you cannot have BOARD OF DIRECTORS : birds without native plants and you President: cannot have native plants without Jenny Welch.............. [email protected] birds. We discussed what birds eat 1st Vice President: based upon their beaks. Mark Johnson ....... [email protected] We went on a walk to the Window Secretary: by the pond, a great place to see birds Sandy Webb....... [email protected] because it is a room with glass Treasurer: overlooking a small pond. OPEN ................................... Apply now Along the way we saw several Chapter Rep: birds…mockingbird, cardinal, blue .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Academy of Science
    Journal of the CODEN: AKASO ISBN: 0097-4374 ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 61 2007 Library Rate ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES 1701 N. BOULDER RUSSELLVILLE. AR 72801-2222 Arkansas Academy ofScience, Dept. of Physical Sciences, Arkansas Tech University PAST PRESIDENTS OF THE ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Charles Brookover, 1917 C. E. Hoffman, 1959 Paul Sharrah, 1984 Dwight M. Moore, 1932-33, 64 N. D. Buffaloe, 1960 William L. Evans, 1985 Flora Haas, 1934 H. L. Bogan, 1961 Gary Heidt, 1986 H. H. Hyman, 1935 Trumann McEver, 1962 Edmond Bacon, 1987 L. B. Ham, 1936 Robert Shideler, 1963 Gary Tucker, 1988 W. C. Muon, 1937 L. F. Bailey, 1965 David Chittenden, 1989 M. J. McHenry, 1938 James H. Fribourgh, 1966 Richard K. Speairs, Jr. 1990 T. L. Smith, 1939 Howard Moore, 1967 Robert Watson, 1991 P. G. Horton, 1940 John J. Chapman, 1968 Michael W. Rapp, 1992 I. A. Willis, 1941-42 Arthur Fry, 1969 Arthur A. Johnson, 1993 L. B. Roberts, 1943-44 M. L. Lawson, 1970 George Harp, 1994 JeffBanks, 1945 R. T. Kirkwood, 1971 James Peck, 1995 H. L. Winburn, 1946-47 George E. Templeton, 1972 Peggy R. Dorris, 1996 E. A. Provine, 1948 E. B. Wittlake, 1973 Richard Kluender, 1997 G. V. Robinette, 1949 Clark McCarty, 1974 James Daly, 1998 John R. Totter, 1950 Edward Dale, 1975 Rose McConnell, 1999 R. H. Austin, 1951 Joe Guenter, 1976 Mostafa Hemmati, 2000 E. A. Spessard, 1952 Jewel Moore, 1977 Mark Draganjac, 2001 Delbert Swartz, 1953 Joe Nix, 1978 John Rickett, 2002 Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park
    Wekiva River Basin State Parks Approved Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks October 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 7 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 9 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 9 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 9 Management Coordination ................................................................. 10 Public Participation ............................................................................ 10 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 13 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 19 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 19 Topography .................................................................................. 19 Geology ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Looks at and for Onespa, Buzyges, and Librita (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae), with New Combinations and Descriptions of a New Genus and Six New Species
    INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0089 New looks at and for Onespa, Buzyges, and Librita (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae), with new combinations and descriptions of a new genus and six new species George T. Austin and Andrew D. Warren McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida, P.O. Box 112710 Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA Date of Issue: July 24, 2009 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL George T. Austin and Andrew D. Warren New looks at and for Onespa, Buzyges, and Librita (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae), with new combinations and descriptions of a new genus and six new species Insecta Mundi 0089: 1-55 Published in 2009 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 U. S. A. http://www.centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non-marine arthropod taxon. Manuscripts considered for publication include, but are not limited to, systematic or taxonomic studies, revisions, nomenclatural changes, faunal studies, book reviews, phylo- genetic analyses, biological or behavioral studies, etc. Insecta Mundi is widely distributed, and refer- enced or abstracted by several sources including the Zoological Record, CAB Abstracts, etc. As of 2007, Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, not as quarterly issues. As manuscripts are completed they are published and given an individual number. Manuscripts must be peer reviewed prior to submission, after which they are again reviewed by the editorial board to insure quality. One author of each submitted manuscript must be a current member of the Center for System- atic Entomology.
    [Show full text]