DOCSLIB.ORG

Arkansas Academy of Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Journal of the CODEN: AKASO ISBN: 0097-4374 ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 61 2007 Library Rate ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES 1701 N. BOULDER RUSSELLVILLE. AR 72801-2222 Arkansas Academy ofScience, Dept. of Physical Sciences, Arkansas Tech University PAST PRESIDENTS OF THE ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Charles Brookover, 1917 C. E. Hoffman, 1959 Paul Sharrah, 1984 Dwight M. Moore, 1932-33, 64 N. D. Buffaloe, 1960 William L. Evans, 1985 Flora Haas, 1934 H. L. Bogan, 1961 Gary Heidt, 1986 H. H. Hyman, 1935 Trumann McEver, 1962 Edmond Bacon, 1987 L. B. Ham, 1936 Robert Shideler, 1963 Gary Tucker, 1988 W. C. Muon, 1937 L. F. Bailey, 1965 David Chittenden, 1989 M. J. McHenry, 1938 James H. Fribourgh, 1966 Richard K. Speairs, Jr. 1990 T. L. Smith, 1939 Howard Moore, 1967 Robert Watson, 1991 P. G. Horton, 1940 John J. Chapman, 1968 Michael W. Rapp, 1992 I. A. Willis, 1941-42 Arthur Fry, 1969 Arthur A. Johnson, 1993 L. B. Roberts, 1943-44 M. L. Lawson, 1970 George Harp, 1994 JeffBanks, 1945 R. T. Kirkwood, 1971 James Peck, 1995 H. L. Winburn, 1946-47 George E. Templeton, 1972 Peggy R. Dorris, 1996 E. A. Provine, 1948 E. B. Wittlake, 1973 Richard Kluender, 1997 G. V. Robinette, 1949 Clark McCarty, 1974 James Daly, 1998 John R. Totter, 1950 Edward Dale, 1975 Rose McConnell, 1999 R. H. Austin, 1951 Joe Guenter, 1976 Mostafa Hemmati, 2000 E. A. Spessard, 1952 Jewel Moore, 1977 Mark Draganjac, 2001 Delbert Swartz, 1953 Joe Nix, 1978 John Rickett, 2002 Z. V. Harvalik, 1954 P. Max Johnston, 1979 Walt Godwin, 2003 M. Ruth Armstrong, 1955 E. Leon Richards, 1980 Wayne Gray, 2004 W. W. Nedrow, 1956 Henry W. Robison, 1981 Betty Crump, 2005 Jack W. Sears, 1957 John K. Beadles, 1982 Stanley E. Trauth, 2006 J. R. Mundie, 1958 Robbin C. Anderson, 1983 David Saugey, 2007 INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERS The Arkansas Academy ofScience recognizes the support ofthe following institutions through their Institutional Membership in the Academy. ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, Jonesboro UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, Little Rock ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSTIY, Russellville UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT MONTICELLO JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY, Siloam Springs UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT PINE BLUFF SOUTHERN ARKANSAS UNIVERSITY, Magnolia UNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS, Clarksville UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, Fort Smith EDITORIAL STAFF Editor-in-Chief Managing Editor Biota Editor Stanley E. Trauth Chris T. McAllister Douglas A. James Dept. ofBiological Sciences Dept. ofPhysical & Life Sciences Dept. ofBiological Sciences Arkansas State University Chadron State College Univ. ofArkansas - Fayetteville P.O. Box 599 1000 Main Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 State University, AR 72467-0599 Chadron, NE 69337 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] COVER: Transmission electron micrograph ofa cross section ofthe spermatozoon ofthe Western Lesser Siren, Siren intermedia nettingi. Photo by Stan Trauth. ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE 2007 APRIL 13-14, 2007 91 sT ANNUAL MEETING Arkansas Tech University (Lake Point Conference Center) Russellville, Arkansas r JOURNAL ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE ANNUAL MEETING 13-14 APRIL 2007 LAKE POINT CONFERENCE CENTER ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY David Sangey Collis Geren JeffRobertson President President-Elect Secretary Mostafa Hemmati Mostafa Hemmati Henry Robison Treasurer NAAS Delegate Historian Secretary's Report MINUTES OF THE 91 sT MEETING ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE generated for each accepted manuscript by Jeremy Baker ofBBS 91" ANNUAL MEETING and provided to me in a timely manner. Submitting PDFs by BBS SUMMARY OF I" and 2nd BUSINESS MEETINGS has greatly enhanced the editing process. Formatting problems Arkansas Tech University (Lake Point Conference Center) did arise in some articles that contained mathematical formulae April 13-14, 2007 and equations. (I urge authors submitting manuscripts using lengthy mathematical equations to generate those materials into a I. With tiny taps ofthe ceremonial gavel, David Saugey, President I-column format.) The final galley ofthe Journal was submitted ofthe AAS called the meetings to order. for publication on March 22, 2007. I ask for continued support of $600 for the Editorial Assistant and $200 for the Editor-in-Chief. 2. Historian: Henry Robison, SAU: submitted a report that the And, as a reminder to the Executive Committee, 2007 (Volume spring meeting on April 13-14,2007 is the 9Ist Annual meeting 61) ofthe Journal will be my last official year as Editor-in-Chief. of the Arkansas Academy of Science. This meeting marks the I will have served 15 consecutive years as either the Managing sixth time the Academy has met on the Arkansas Tech University Editor orEditor-in-Chiefofthe Academy. campus in Russellville, Arkansas. The other years were: 1960, 1970, 1977, 1988, and 1999. 6. Journal Managing Editor: Chris T. McAllister, Managing Editor­ JAAS: There were 37 manuscripts submitted (for comparison 31 3. Secretary: Jeff Robertson, ATU: The minutes from 2006 were submitted last year, an increase of 17%) for consideration Executive Committee business meeting in November 2006 were ofpublication in volume 60 (2006) ofthe JAAS at the Batesville distributed and approved. These minutes will be going on the meeting in April 2006. All 37 papers were sent out for review. AAS website. Prior to this meeting, the current membership list Papers were sent out in early summer to reviewers and Assoc. included approximately 115 members (49 which are life members) Editors and returned between July-September 2006. There was ofthe Academy along with 14 institutional members. some tardiness in getting back a couple of reviews, as usual. One reviewer (I will not mention their name) did not send back a 4. Treasurer/Auditor: Mostafa Hemmati, ATU: The "books~ review at all, even after three friendly reminders to do so. maintained by the Academy Treasurer were reviewed by Joyce An Asst. Editor read mss. for style. grammar, format. etc. Hardin and David Saugey and found to be good financial records Authors were then contacted via letter by me in Sept. or October kept with excellent integrity and showing no inconsistencies 2006 as to whether their paper was accepted tentatively and or irregularities. (The financial status of the Academy is an needed minor or major revision or whether their paper was Appendix found elsewhere in this JAAS volume for review). outright rejected. Authors were asked to tum the revision around in 48-72 hours. 5. Journal Editor-in-Chief: Stan Trauth, ASU: I am pleased to and send back to Dr. StanTrauth, Editor-in-Chief, by late October/ report that the printing ofVolume 60 ofthe Journal has gone quite early November 2006, preferably by overnight mail. smoothly this year. I changed publishing duties from PinPoint Four (11%) of the mss. were outright rejected. These did Color of Jonesboro, AR, to Bank & Business Solutions, 1208 not report any new information or were in need of additional Falls Street, Jonesboro, AR 72401, under the tutelage of Roger supportive data. All reviewers noted this important necessity and Williams (1.800.442.2108), a long-time publisher of the Journal. I concurred. Two other papers simply did not report publishable His on-line address www.printformance.com can be accessed for data. purchasing ofCDs and PDFs ofthe Journal articles. A total of185 Numerous papers only needed minor revision and were in pretty copies was producedata cost of$9,512.37. Anadditional 35 copies good shape. In fact, I have noticed an improvement over the last costing $1600 are going to be ordered to provide for membership few years inauthors paying closer attention to style and format of errors. Also, an extra $300 was included in the total cost because the journal, and that has helped Stan and me tremendously. of formatting issues associated with articles incorporating The breakdown ofsubmitted papers and their general topics were mathematical equations (see below). Revised manuscripts were as follows: provided the William's publishing team (hereafter, BBS) via o Invertebrates/insects = 5 (2 were rejected) CD and hard copy in October and November, 2006. PDFs were o Fisheries/Ichthyology = 5 Journal oftheArkansas Academy ofScience, VoL 61, 2007 Secretary's Report o Amphibians = I (rejected) The Arkansas Science Talent Search (ASTS) has engaged in the o Reptiles = 1 follo\\ling activities this year: o Birds=2 Developed a website to advertise the ASTS (http://faculty. o Bats = 2 (1 was withdrawn) uca.edu/-wvslaton/ASTS/) o Other Mammals = I Sent electronic announcements to the K-16 Arkansas o Engineering = I Science Educator ListSrv: (http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/ o Biorefineries = 1 wa.exe?AO=SCIENCE) o Botany=4 Received two application submissions, judged to be worthy o Forestry = 2 of1st and 2nd place. o Geography (GPS) = I Winners will present their research on April 6th at the o Chemistry = 4 Arkansas Science Fair. o Physics =3 Winners will receive certificates and a cash award. I expect o Mathematics = 1 to award the 1st place winner with $100 and the 2nd place o Science Education = 1 (rejected) winner with $50. o Parasitology = 2 Note: There were no geology, astronomy, medical, or Activities to be pursued in the coming year include: biochemistry papers this year. Investigate award co-sponsors (UCA's College of Natural • Page proofs from the Editor-in-Chief were forwarded to me for Science and Mathematics) examination in late January 2007 and I made initial corrections Coordinate with the Arkansas Center for Mathematics and on all before sending them out to authors in early to mid-February Science Education (http://www.arkansasmath.coml) and 2007. We requested they be returnedto Dr. Trauth within a 1week the Arkansas Department ofEducation (http://arkedu.state. turnaround time. Authors were also informed how to order PDFs ar.us/) to better advertise the ASTS and increase the number oftheir article from the printer, Roger Williams at Printformance ofapplications received http://ww\v.printformance.comlJAAS/ Update the ASTS website with pictures & info ofthe 2007 Corrected proofs were returned to Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Resasco Etal 2014 Plosone.Pdf (1.045Mb)

    Resasco Etal 2014 Plosone.Pdf (1.045Mb)

    Using Historical and Experimental Data to Reveal Warming Effects on Ant Assemblages The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Resasco, Julian, Shannon L. Pelini, Katharine L. Stuble, Nathan J. Sanders, Robert R. Dunn, Sarah E. Diamond, Aaron M. Ellison, Nicholas J. Gotelli, and Douglas J. Levey. 2014. “Using Historical and Experimental Data to Reveal Warming Effects on Ant Assemblages.” Edited by Martin Heil. PLoS ONE 9 (2) (February 4): e88029. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0088029. Published Version doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088029 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11857773 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Using Historical and Experimental Data to Reveal Warming Effects on Ant Assemblages Julian Resasco1*†, Shannon L. Pelini2, Katharine L. Stuble 3‡, Nathan J. Sanders3§, Robert R. Dunn4, Sarah E. Diamond4¶, Aaron M. Ellison5, Nicholas J. Gotelli6, Douglas J. Levey7 1Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 2Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 4Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 5Harvard University, Harvard Forest, Petersham, MA 01366 USA 6Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA 7National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230, USA † Current address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA ‡ Current address: Oklahoma Biological Survey, 111 E.
  • Alternative Reproductive Tactics in the Ant Genus Hypoponera

    Alternative Reproductive Tactics in the Ant Genus Hypoponera

    Alternative reproductive tactics in the ant genus Hypoponera Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften an der Fakultät für Biologie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München vorgelegt von Markus H. Rüger aus Marktoberdorf 2007 Erklärung Diese Dissertation wurde im Sinne von § 12 der Promotionsordnung von Frau Prof. Dr. Susanne Foitzik betreut. Ich erkläre hiermit, dass die Dissertation keiner anderen Prüfungskommission vorgelegt worden ist und dass ich mich nicht anderweitig einer Doktorprüfung ohne Erfolg unterzogen habe. Ehrenwörtliche Versicherung Ich versichere hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass die vorgelegte Dissertation von mir selbständig und ohne unerlaubte Hilfe angefertigt wurde. München den 9. Oktober 2007 ........................................................................... Markus H. Rüger Dissertation eingereicht am: 9. Oktober 2007 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Susanne Foitzik 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Bart Kempenaers Mündliche Prüfung am: 20. Februar 2008 Table of Contents General Introduction…………………………………………………………………. 9 Chapter I: Alternative reproductive tactics and sex allocation in the bivoltine ant Hypoponera opacior…………………………………….... 21 Abstract………………………………………………………………………… 23 Introduction……………………………………………………………………. 25 Material & Methods…………………………………………………………… 27 Results.………………………………………………………………………… 30 Discussion……………………………………………………........................... 38 Conclusions......................................................................................................... 43 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………….
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River

    Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River

    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
  • The Ants of Oklahoma Master of Science

    The Ants of Oklahoma Master of Science

    THE ANTS OF OKLAHOMA By Jerry H. Young(I\" Bachelor of Science Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College Stillwater, Oklahoma 1955 Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE January 1 1956 tl<lAWMA AGCMCl«.f�Al L �Ci'!AlttCAl e&U.Ull LIBRARY JUL16195 6 THE ANTS OF OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser }>JcMem��f � 't'" he Thesis ) Committee Member of the Thesis Committee 7'4'.��Member of the Thesis Committee Head of the Department ifean of the Graduate School 361565 ii PREFACE The study of the distribution of ants in the United States has been a long and continuous process with many contributors, but the State of Oklahoma has not received the attentions of these observers to any great extent. The only known list of ants of Oklahoma is one prepared by Mo Ro Smith (1935)0 Early in 1954 a survey of the state of Oklahoma was made to determine the species present and their distributiono The results of this survey, which blanketed the entire State, are given in this paper. The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dro Do E. Howell, chairman of the writer's thesis committee, for his valuable assistance and careful guidance in the preparation of this papero Also, much guidance on preparation of this manuscrip_t was received from Drs. Do Eo Bryan, William H. Irwin and F. A. Fenton. Many of the determin­ ations were made by M. R. Smith.. Vital infonnation was obtained from the museums at Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College and the University of Oklahoma.
  • Pseudomyrmex Gracilis and Monomorium Floricola (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Collected in Mississippi

    Pseudomyrmex Gracilis and Monomorium Floricola (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Collected in Mississippi

    Midsouth Entomologist 3: 106–109 ISSN: 1936-6019 www.midsouthentomologist.org.msstate.edu Report Two New Exotic Pest Ants, Pseudomyrmex gracilis and Monomorium floricola (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Collected in Mississippi MacGown, J. A.* and J. G. Hill Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762 *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Received: 26-VII-2010 Accepted: 28-VII-2010 Here we report collections of two new exotic pest ants, Pseudomyrmex gracilis (F) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Pseudomyrmicinae) and Monomorium floricola (Jerdon) (Myrmicinae), from Mississippi. We collected specimens of these two species on Sabal palm (Sabal sp., Arecaceae) on 20 May 2010 at an outdoor nursery specializing in palm trees in Gulfport, Harrison County, Mississippi (30°23'47"N 89°05'33W). Both species of ants were collected on the same individual tree, which was planted directly in the soil. Several workers of Monomorium were observed and collected, but only one worker of the Pseudomyrmex was collected. No colonies of either species were discovered, but our reluctance to damage the palm by searching for colonies prevented a more thorough search. Palms at this nursery were imported from Florida, and it is therefore possible that the ants were inadvertently introduced with the plants, as both of these species are known to occur in Florida (Deyrup et al. 2000). The Mexican twig or elongate twig ant, P. gracilis (Figure 1) has a widespread distribution from Argentina and Brazil to southern Texas and the Caribbean (Ward 1993, Wetterer and Wetterer 2003). This species is exotic elsewhere in the United States, only being reported from Florida, Hawaii, and Louisiana.
  • International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods 424 Poster Presentations ______

    International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods 424 Poster Presentations ______

    POSTER PRESENTATIONS ______________________________________________________________ Poster Presentations 423 IMPROVEMENT OF RELEASE METHOD FOR APHIDOLETES APHIDIMYZA (DIPTERA: CECIDOMYIIDAE) BASED ON ECOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL STUDIES Junichiro Abe and Junichi Yukawa Entomological Laboratory, Kyushu University, Japan ABSTRACT. In many countries, Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rondani) has been used effectively as a biological control agent against aphids, particularly in greenhouses. In Japan, A. aphidimyza was reg- istered as a biological control agent in April 1999, and mass-produced cocoons have been imported from The Netherlands and United Kingdom since mass-rearing methods have not yet been estab- lished. In recent years, the effect of imported A. aphidimyza on aphid populations was evaluated in greenhouses at some Agricultural Experiment Stations in Japan. However, no striking effect has been reported yet from Japan. The failure of its use in Japan seems to be caused chiefly by the lack of detailed ecological or behavioral information of A. aphidimyza. Therefore, we investigated its ecological and behavioral attributes as follows: (1) the survival of pupae in relation to the depth of pupation sites; (2) the time of adult emergence in response to photoperiod during the pupal stage; (3) the importance of a hanging substrate for successful mating; and (4) the influence of adult size and nutrient status on adult longev- ity and fecundity. (1) A commercial natural enemy importer in Japan suggests that users divide cocoons into groups and put each group into a plastic container filled with vermiculite to a depth of 100 mm. However, we believe this is too deep for A. aphidimyza pupae, since under natural conditions mature larvae spin their cocoons in the top few millimeters to a maxmum depth of 30 mm.
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

    Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

    SYSTEMATICS Phylogenetic Analysis of Aphaenogaster Supports the Resurrection of Novomessor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 1 B. B. DEMARCO AND A. I. COGNATO Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 288 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 108(2): 201–210 (2015); DOI: 10.1093/aesa/sau013 ABSTRACT The ant genus Aphaenogaster Mayr is an ecologically diverse group that is common throughout much of North America. Aphaenogaster has a complicated taxonomic history due to variabil- ity of taxonomic characters. Novomessor Emery was previously synonymized with Aphaenogaster, which was justified by the partial mesonotal suture observed in Aphaenogaster ensifera Forel. Previous studies using Bayesian phylogenies with molecular data suggest Aphaenogaster is polyphyletic. Convergent evolution and retention of ancestral similarities are two major factors contributing to nonmonophyly of Aphaenogaster. Based on 42 multistate morphological characters and five genes, we found Novomessor more closely related to Veromessor Forel and that this clade is sister to Aphaenogaster. Our results confirm the validity of Novomessor stat. r. as a separate genus, and it is resurrected based on the combi- nation of new DNA, morphological, behavioral, and ecological data. KEY WORDS Aphaenogaster, Novomessor, phylogenetics, resurrection Introduction phylogenetic analyses resolved Aphaenogaster as polyphyletic, including Messor Forel, 1890 and Sten- The ant genus Aphaenogaster Mayr, 1853 is a speciose amma (Brady et al. 2006, Moreau and Bell 2013). group,whichhasnotbeentaxonomicallyreviewedin Ward (2011) suggested that convergent evolution and over 60 years (Creighton 1950). Aphaenogaster con- retention of ancestral similarities were two major fac- tains 227 worldwide species (Bolton 2006), with 23 tors contributing to polyphyly of Aphaenogaster. valid North American species reduced from 31 original Aphaenogaster taxonomy was further complicated species descriptions.
  • NENHC 2013 Oral Presentation Abstracts

    NENHC 2013 Oral Presentation Abstracts

    Oral Presentation Abstracts Listed alphabetically by presenting author. Presenting author names appear in bold. Code following abstract refers to session presentation was given in (Day [Sun = Sunday, Mon = Monday] – Time slot [AM1 = early morning session, AM2 = late morning session, PM1 = early afternoon session, PM2 = late afternoon session] – Room – Presentation sequence. For example, Mon-PM1-B-3 indicates: Monday early afternoon session in room B, and presentation was the third in sequence of presentations for that session. Using that information and the overview of sessions chart below, one can see that it was part of the “Species-Specific Management of Invasives” session. Presenters’ contact information is provided in a separate list at the end of this document. Overview of Oral Presentation Sessions SUNDAY MORNING SUNDAY APRIL 14, 2013 8:30–10:00 Concurrent Sessions - Morning I Room A Room B Room C Room D Cooperative Regional (Multi- Conservation: state) In-situ Breeding Ecology of Ant Ecology I Working Together to Reptile/Amphibian Songbirds Reintroduce and Conservation Establish Species 10:45– Concurrent Sessions - Morning II 12:40 Room A Room B Room C Room D Hemlock Woolly Bird Migration and Adelgid and New Marine Ecology Urban Ecology Ecology England Forests 2:00–3:52 Concurrent Sessions - Afternoon I Room A Room B Room C Room D A Cooperative Effort to Identify and Impacts on Natural History and Use of Telemetry for Report Newly Biodiversity of Trends in Northern Study of Aquatic Emerging Invasive Hydraulic Fracturing Animals
  • 2006 Imported Fire Ant Conference Proceedings

    2006 Imported Fire Ant Conference Proceedings

    Index to Submitted ~bstracts/~rticles* *NOTE: NS denotes Not Submitted Session: Chemical Control H. Dorough, F. Graham, V. Bertagnolli, A. Wiggins, W. Datcher: Fire ants at Talladega: bringing NASCAR fans back down to earth 19 J. Altom: Esteem ant bait now labeled for pasture and hay 20 C. Barr, A. Calixto: Mixing bait and fertilizer: is it ok, yet? T. Birthisel: Report on 2005 ANDE development activity-Tast-E-Bait and Fertibait for use with insect growth regulators and other active ingredients for imported fire ant control NS D. Vander Hooven: TAST-E-Bait, a new improved bait carrier T. Rashid, P. Parkman, J. Oliver, K. Vail: Mortality response of red, black and hybrid imported fire ants to insecticide treated soil in laboratory bioassays R. Hickman, D. Calibeo-Hayes, B. Everson: Metaflumizone: a new insecticide for imported fire ant bait from BASF L. Greenberg, M. Rust, J. Klotz: Metaflumizone trials against RIFA in California using corn chips as an estimate of ant abundance 38 D. Pollet: Fire ant management at poultry houses P. Nester, W. Thompson, B. Drees: Discussion of 2005 survey of Texas aerial applicators Session: Behavior & Chemical Ecology T. Fink, L. Gui, D. Streett, J. Seiner: Preliminary observations of phorid fly (Pseudacteon cumatus) and black imported fire ant interactions with high-speed videography Y. Lin, H. Chang, C. Lin, H. Ho, W. Wu: Differential cuticular chemical profiles between monogyne and polygyne red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) colonies S. Ochleng: Imported fire ant repellency and mortality following exposure to Ecotroll EC R. Renthal, D. Velasquez, D. Gonzalea, A.
  • Effects of Prescribed Fire and Social Insects on Saproxylic Beetles in A

    Effects of Prescribed Fire and Social Insects on Saproxylic Beetles in A

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Efects of prescribed fre and social insects on saproxylic beetles in a subtropical forest Michael D. Ulyshen1 ✉ , Andrea Lucky2 & Timothy T. Work3 We tested the immediate and delayed efects of a low-intensity prescribed fre on beetles, ants and termites inhabiting log sections cut from moderately decomposed pine trees in the southeastern United States. We also explored co-occurrence patterns among these insects. Half the logs were placed at a site scheduled for a prescribed fre while the rest were assigned to a neighboring site not scheduled to be burned. We then collected insects emerging from sets of logs collected immediately after the fre as well as after 2, 6, 26 and 52 weeks. The fre had little efect on the number of beetles and ants collected although beetle richness was signifcantly higher in burned logs two weeks after the fre. Both beetle and ant communities difered between treatments, however, with some species preferring either burned or unburned logs. We found no evidence that subterranean termites (Reticulitermes) were infuenced by the fre. Based on co-occurrence analysis, positive associations among insect species were over two times more common than negative associations. This diference was signifcant overall as well for ant × beetle and beetle × beetle associations. Relatively few signifcant positive or negative associations were detected between termites and the other insect taxa, however. Dead wood is one of the most important resources for biodiversity in forests worldwide, supporting diverse and interacting assemblages of invertebrates, fungi and prokaryotes1,2. In addition to many species that oppor- tunistically beneft from dead wood, about one third of all forest insect species are saproxylic, meaning they are strictly dependent on this resource at some stage in their life cycle, and many of them have become threatened in intensively managed landscapes3,4.
  • Swarth, C. Et Al. the 2007 Jug Bay Bioblitz Reliort. 2008

    Swarth, C. Et Al. the 2007 Jug Bay Bioblitz Reliort. 2008

    2007 Jug Bay BioBlitz Report Christopher Swarth, Lindsay Hollister, Elaine Friebele, Karyn Molines and Susan Matthews Jug Bay Wetlands Sanctuary December 2008 Introduction A BioBlitz is a 24-hour field survey and inventory of organisms in a well-defined area such as a park or other natural area. The objective of this intensive survey is to generate a catalog or list of all species that are identified or collected during the brief survey period. The first BioBlitz in the United States was conducted in 1996 in Washington, DC. Today dozens of BioBlitzes are held annually in the United States (see Wikipedia Encyclopedia; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BioBlitz. A BioBlitz increases local knowledge of biodiversity and involves local naturalists and the public in coordinated fieldwork and observation. The surveys raise the awareness among the general public about the natural world and the importance of biodiversity. The species distribution and occurrence information that is obtained from a BioBlitz also provides resource managers with a deeper understanding of the natural lands under their management, thus enabling improved habitat stewardship. The 2007 Jug Bay BioBlitz took place at the Jug Bay Wetlands Sanctuary over a 24-hour period, from 12:00 (noon) on 15 September to 12:00 on 16 September. We organized this event in order to take advantage of the growing interest in biodiversity by the public and to tap in to the community of active, highly skilled naturalists in the Washington DC/Baltimore area. For this first-time effort we concentrated the field surveys on groups of organisms for which local biogeographical information was poor or incomplete (for example, ants, ground bees, spiders and zooplankton), rather than on the groups for which our knowledge on distribution was relatively thorough such as birds and herps.
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science

    Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science

    An Annotated List of the Ants of Indiana Ralph L. Morris, Indiana State Department of Conservation, Division of Entomology During the past few years, the writer has been interested in a study of the ants of Indiana and has been able to collect records of some 92 species, subspecies and varieties known to have been taken in the state. Insomuch as the only list of Indiana ants, published as such, to have appeared previous to this date contained only 42 known species and appeared over 25 years ago, it is felt that perhaps a more up to date list would be of interest to those engaged in the study of this family. Dr. Wra. Morton Wheeler (1916) l published the first list of Indiana ants, mentioned above, together with notes on their habits and habitat, based on material collected by Dr. W. S. Blatchley, whose collection is now a part of the Purdue University collection. The writer's work includes Dr. Wheeler's list, and many of his notes on habits of the various species are used. To Wheeler's species has been supplemented new records from the writer's collections and from material taken by numer- ous other collectors 2 as well as specimens present at Purdue University. Of the species taken by the writer, 19 were found which were not included in Wheeler's paper. Records of 14 additional species taken in the state were furnished by Dr. Mary Talbot (1934), who made a study of the ants of the Chicago region and Turkey Run State Park, Parke County, in 1934.