Global Report on Human Settlements 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Report on Human Settlements 2011 STATISTICAL ANNEX GENERAL DISCLAIMER The designations employed and presentation of the data do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or bound- aries. TECHNICAL NOTES The Statistical Annex comprises 16 tables covering such Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, broad statistical categories as demography, housing, Somalia, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tuvalu, Uganda, United economic and social indicators. The Annex is divided into Republic of Tanzania, Vanuatu, Yemen, Zambia. three sections presenting data at the regional, country and city levels. Tables A.1 to A.4 present regional-level data Small Island Developing States:1 American Samoa, grouped by selected criteria of economic and development Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Bahrain, achievements, as well as geographic distribution. Tables B.1 Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Cape Verde, to B.8 contain country-level data and Tables C.1 to C.3 are Comoros, Cook Islands, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican devoted to city-level data. Data have been compiled from Republic, Fiji, French Polynesia, Grenada, Guam, Guinea- various international sources, from national statistical offices Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Kiribati, Maldives, Marshall and from the United Nations. Islands, Mauritius, Micronesia (Federated States of), Montserrat, Nauru, Netherlands Antilles, New Caledonia, Niue, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Papua New Guinea, EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS Puerto Rico, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, São Tomé and Príncipe, The following symbols have been used in presenting data Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Suriname, Timor-Leste, Tonga, throughout the Statistical Annex: Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, United States Virgin Islands, Vanuatu. category not applicable .. data not available … Sub-Saharan Africa: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina magnitude zero – Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic COUNTRY GROUPINGS AND Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea- STATISTICAL AGGREGATES Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mayotte, Morocco, Mozambique, World major groupings Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Réunion, Rwanda, Saint Helena, São More developed regions: All countries and areas of Europe Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, and Northern America, as well as Australia, Japan and New Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Togo, Uganda, Zealand. United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Less developed regions: All countries and areas of Africa, Countries in the Human Development Index Latin America, Asia (excluding Japan) and Oceania (exclud- aggregates2 ing Australia and New Zealand). Very high human development: Andorra, Australia, Least developed countries: Afghanistan, Angola, Austria, Bahrain, Barbados, Belgium, Brunei Darussalam, Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Canada, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong SAR of China, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Equatorial Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Liechtenstein, Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Haiti, Kiribati, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lesotho, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Arab Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Rwanda, Samoa, São Emirates, United Kingdom, United States of America. 188 Cities and Climate Change High human development: Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Upper-middle income: Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Belarus, Belize, Bosnia and Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Croatia, Ecuador, Georgia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Latvia, Libyan Arab Fiji, Gabon, Grenada, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Jamaica, Jamahiriya, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Lithuania, Montenegro, Panama, Peru, Romania, Russian Federation, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mayotte, Mexico, Montenegro, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, The former Yugoslav Republic of Namibia, Palau, Panama, Peru, Romania, Russian Federation, Macedonia, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Serbia, Seychelles, South Africa, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Ukraine, Uruguay, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Turkey, Uruguay, Medium human development: Bolivia, Botswana, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). Cambodia, Cape Verde, China, Congo, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Fiji, Gabon, Lower-middle income: Angola, Armenia, Belize, Bhutan, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Bolivia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, China, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Maldives, Micronesia Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Georgia, Guatemala, (Federated States of), Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Jordan, Kiribati, Namibia, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Paraguay, Philippines, São Lesotho, Maldives, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated Tomé and Príncipe, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Sri Lanka, States of), Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Suriname, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Occupied Palestinian Territory, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam. Paraguay, Philippines, Samoa, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic, Low human development: Afghanistan, Angola, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Bangladesh, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Viet Nam, Yemen. Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Low income: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Benin, Burkina Faso, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kenya, Burundi, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Chad, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Comoros, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Papua New Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Guinea, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Togo, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kenya, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Yemen, Zambia, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Liberia, Zimbabwe. Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Tajikistan, Togo, Uganda, United Republic Countries in the income aggregates3 of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe. The World Bank classifies all member economies and all other economies with populations of more than 30,000. In Sub-regional aggregates the World Development Report 2011, economies are divided among income groups according to 2009 GNI per capita, n Africa calculated using the World Bank Atlas method. The groups Eastern Africa: Burundi, Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, are: Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mayotte, Mozambique, Réunion, Rwanda, Seychelles, Somalia, High income: Andorra, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Bahrain, Barbados, Belgium, Bermuda, Brunei Darussalam, Middle Africa: Angola, Cameroon, Central African Canada, Cayman Islands, Channel Islands, Croatia, Cyprus, Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Czech Republic, Denmark, Equatorial Guinea, Estonia, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, São Tomé and Príncipe. Faeroe Islands, Finland, France, French Polynesia, Germany, Northern Africa: Algeria, Egypt, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Gibraltar, Greece, Greenland, Guam, Hong Kong SAR of Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia, Western Sahara. China, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Isle of Man, Israel, Italy, Southern Africa: Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, South Japan, Kuwait, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Macao Africa, Swaziland. SAR of China, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands Antilles, Western Africa: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Côte Netherlands, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Northern d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mariana Islands, Norway, Oman, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Helena, Senegal, Rico, Qatar, Republic of Korea, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Sierra Leone, Togo. Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands, United Arab n Asia Emirates, United Kingdom, United States of America, United Eastern Asia: China, Hong Kong SAR of China, Macao SAR States Virgin Islands. of China, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Japan, Mongolia, Republic of Korea. Technical Notes 189 South-Central Asia: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, NOMENCLATURE AND India, Iran
Recommended publications
  • Quantifying Arbovirus Disease and Transmission Risk at the Municipality
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.30.20143248; this version posted July 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 1 1 Title: Quantifying arbovirus disease and transmission risk at the municipality 2 level in the Dominican Republic: the inception of Rm 3 Short title: Epidemic Metrics for Municipalities 4 Rhys Kingston1, Isobel Routledge1, Samir Bhatt1, Leigh R Bowman1* 5 1. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, UK 6 *Corresponding author 7 [email protected] 8 9 NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. 1 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.30.20143248; this version posted July 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 2 10 Abstract 11 Arboviruses remain a significant cause of morbidity, mortality and economic cost 12 across the global human population. Epidemics of arboviral disease, such as Zika 13 and dengue, also cause significant disruption to health services at local and national 14 levels. This study examined 2014-16 Zika and dengue epidemic data at the sub- 15 national level to characterise transmission across the Dominican Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Crime and Instability in Central Africa
    Organized Crime and Instability in Central Africa: A Threat Assessment Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: +(43) (1) 26060-0, Fax: +(43) (1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org OrgAnIzed CrIme And Instability In CenTrAl AFrica A Threat Assessment United Nations publication printed in Slovenia October 2011 – 750 October 2011 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Organized Crime and Instability in Central Africa A Threat Assessment Copyright © 2011, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Acknowledgements This study was undertaken by the UNODC Studies and Threat Analysis Section (STAS), Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs (DPA). Researchers Ted Leggett (lead researcher, STAS) Jenna Dawson (STAS) Alexander Yearsley (consultant) Graphic design, mapping support and desktop publishing Suzanne Kunnen (STAS) Kristina Kuttnig (STAS) Supervision Sandeep Chawla (Director, DPA) Thibault le Pichon (Chief, STAS) The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the data and information reported by governments to UNODC and other international organizations. UNODC is particularly thankful to govern- ment and law enforcement officials met in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda and Uganda while undertaking research. Special thanks go to all the UNODC staff members - at headquarters and field offices - who reviewed various sections of this report. The research team also gratefully acknowledges the information, advice and comments provided by a range of officials and experts, including those from the United Nations Group of Experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, MONUSCO (including the UN Police and JMAC), IPIS, Small Arms Survey, Partnership Africa Canada, the Polé Institute, ITRI and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Médar De La Cruz Serrata 2009
    Copyright by Médar de la Cruz Serrata 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Médar de la Cruz Serrata Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Epic and Dictatorship in the Dominican Republic: The Struggles of Trujillo’s Intellectuals Committee: César A. Salgado, Co-Supervisor Jossianna Arroyo, Co-Supervisor Naomi Lindstrom James Nicolopulos Vance Holloway Adam Z. Newton Epic and Dictatorship in the Dominican Republic: The Struggles of Trujillo’s Intellectuals by Médar de la Cruz Serrata, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May, 2009 Dedication I want to dedicate this dissertation to the loving memory of my mother, Tomasina Serrata (Doña Grey), and to my father, Medardo de la Cruz. To my children, Paloma and Médar Issam, a constant source of joy and inspiration. To Rebeca, who took my hand, brought me back to school and has been by my side at every step of the way: por la alegría compartida . Acknowledgements I would like to express my most sincere gratitude to my dissertation supervisors, César A. Salgado and Jossianna Arroyo, for their constant guidance and encouragement. I am also indebted to James Nicolopulous, who introduced me to the world of epic poetry, and to Naomi Lindstrom, Lily Litvak, Enrique Fierro and Vance Holloway, for their suggestions and their generosity. Many thanks to my friends and colleagues from the Department of Spanish and Portuguese for their support, and to those in the Dominican Republic who gave access to their libraries and offered me advice—especially to Alejandro Paulino, Odalís Pérez, and Plinio Chahín.
    [Show full text]
  • 2714 Surcharge Supp Eng.V.1
    Worldwide Worldwide International Extended Area Delivery Surcharge ➜ Locate the destination country. ➜ Locate the Postal Code or city. ➜ If the Postal Code or city is not listed, the entry All other points will apply. ➜ A surcharge will apply only when a “Yes” is shown in the Extended Area Surcharge column. If a surcharge applies, add $30.00 per shipment or $0.30 per pound ($0.67 per kilogram), whichever is greater, to the charges for your shipment. COUNTRY EXTENDED COUNTRY EXTENDED COUNTRY EXTENDED COUNTRY EXTENDED COUNTRY EXTENDED COUNTRY EXTENDED COUNTRY EXTENDED COUNTRY EXTENDED POSTAL CODE AREA POSTAL CODE AREA POSTAL CODE AREA POSTAL CODE AREA POSTAL CODE AREA POSTAL CODE AREA POSTAL CODE AREA POSTAL CODE AREA OR CITY SURCHARGE OR CITY SURCHARGE OR CITY SURCHARGE OR CITY SURCHARGE OR CITY SURCHARGE OR CITY SURCHARGE OR CITY SURCHARGE OR CITY SURCHARGE ARGENTINA BOLIVIA (CONT.) BRAZIL (CONT.) CHILE (CONT.) COLOMBIA (CONT.) COLOMBIA (CONT.) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC (CONT.) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC (CONT.) 1891 – 1899 Yes Machacamarca Yes 29100 – 29999 Yes El Bosque No Barrancabermeja No Valledupar No Duarte Yes Monte Plata Yes 1901 – 1999 Yes Mizque Yes 32000 – 39999 Yes Estación Central No Barrancas No Villa de Leiva No Duverge Yes Nagua Yes 2001 – 4999 Yes Oruro Yes 44471 – 59999 Yes Huachipato No Barranquilla No Villavicencio No El Cacao Yes Neiba Yes 5001 – 5499 Yes Pantaleón Dalence Yes 68000 – 68999 Yes Huechuraba No Bogotá No Yopal No El Cercado Yes Neyba Yes 5501 – 9999 Yes Portachuelo Yes 70640 – 70699 Yes Independencia No Bucaramanga
    [Show full text]
  • Maputo Declaration on the Development of Africa's Cashew
    Maputo Declaration on the Development of Africa’s Cashew Industry Maputo, Mozambique, 14-16 September 2010 MAPUTO DECLARATION We, the stakeholders of the African cashew industry participating in the 5th Annual Conference of the African Cashew Alliance (ACA) in Maputo, Mozambique from 14-16 September 2010, Emphasizing the African cashew industry’s potential to realize more than US$300 million in raw nut sales by smallholder farmers and US$300 million in added value from cashew processing, creating more than 200,000 new jobs for the poor in rural areas, Having considered the recommendations of speakers on growing the international cashew market; improving tree productivity; expanding cashew processing in Africa; and making infrastructure work for smallholder farmers, as well as the outcomes of thematic workshops on improving quality and food safety of cashew products; managing certifications; financial models that work; better coordination of development assistance to the sector; and innovative market and price information systems, Recalling the reports and recommendations of the first Conference of the African Cashew Alliance in Bissau, Guinea-Bissau (March 2006); the second ACA Conference in Maputo, Mozambique (March 2007); the third ACA Conference in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (September 2008); and the fourth ACA Conference in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire (September 2009), available at www.africancashewalliance.com, Endorsing the ACA’s mission to be African cashew industry’s platform and facilitator for advocacy, information exchange, investment
    [Show full text]
  • African Development Bank United Republic of Tanzania
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA DODOMA CITY OUTER RING ROAD (110.2 km) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure RDGE/PICU DEPARTMENTS April 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. STRATEGIC THRUST AND JUSTIFICATIONS ............................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT LINKAGES WITH NATIONAL AND REGIONAL STRATEGIES ........................................................ 1 1.2 RATIONALE FOR BANK INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................. 1 1.3 AID COORDINATION ............................................................................................................................. 2 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 PROJECT COMPONENTS ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS ADOPTED AND ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED .................................................... 3 2.4 PROJECT TYPE ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.5 PROJECT COST AND FINANCING MECHANISMS .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1. KONDOA DISTRICT COUNCIL No Name of the Project Opportunities
    1. KONDOA DISTRICT COUNCIL No Name of Opportunities Geographic Location Land Ownership Ongoing activities Competitive advantage the Project for investors 1. BUKULU Establishment Bukulu Industrial Area is Bukulu Industrial plot There is currently no Bukulu Industrial Area will serve Industrial of Located at Soera ward in area is owned by Kondoa established structure the growing demand for areas Area Manufacturing Kondoa District, Dodoma District Council at Bukulu Industrial to invest in manufacturing Industries Region Future ownership of the Area plot (green The plot is designated for The size of Bukulu land will be discussed field). No demolition manufacturing and located Industrial Area is 400 between the Developer work is needed by about 220km from the Acres and the owner Investor proposed dry port of Ihumwa Bukulu Industrial Area is Investors will be Manufacturing is aligned with located 47km from required to remove Government Five Year Kondoa Town and 197km some shrubs and Development Plan – II (FYDP – from Dodoma Town. conduct other site II) which promotes The Plot is located just off clearance activities industrialisation the main highway from The prospective Industrial Area Dodoma to Arusha is set to enjoy all the necessary The Area is closer to all infrastructures since it is just the necessary 197km from Government infrastructures Capital – Dodoma (electricity, water and The plot is located along the communications) Dodoma – Arusha highway Bukulu area is designated which is the longest and busiest for manufacturing Trans – African transportation Industries corridor linking Cape Town (South Africa) and Cairo (Egypt) 2. PAHI Establishment Pahi Industrial Area is Pahi Industrial plot area There is currently no Pahi Industrial Area will serve Industrial of Located at Pahi ward in is owned by Kondoa established structure the growing demand for areas Area Manufacturing Kondoa District, Dodoma District Council at Pahi Industrial Area to invest in manufacturing Region plot (green field).
    [Show full text]
  • Grant Implementation in Western and Central Africa (WCA) Overcoming Barriers and Enhancing Performance in a Challenging Region
    Advisory Report Grant implementation in Western and Central Africa (WCA) Overcoming barriers and enhancing performance in a challenging region GF-OIG-19-013 May 2019 Geneva, Switzerland Chapter Contents 1. Executive 3. Challenging 4. Global Fund 5. Performance 6. Key focus areas Summary Region Investments PAGES 26 - 41 PAGES 43 - 87 PAGES 3 - 8 PAGES 12 - 18 PAGES 20 - 24 2. Objectives and Methodology 5.1. MALARIA 6.1. GLOBAL FUND PROCESSES 3.1. LIMITED FISCAL SPACE 4.1. FINANCIAL RESOURCES PAGES 9 - 10 5.2. AIDS 6.2. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS 3.2. LOW HEALTH FINANCING 4.2. HUMAN CAPITAL 5.3. TB 6.3. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND RSSH 3.3. LARGE FUNDING GAP 4.3. STRATEGIC INITIATIVES 6.4. ACCESS TO HEALTH 3.4. WEAK HEALTH SYSTEMS 6.5. SUMMARY OF KEY ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS 3.5. FRAGILE ENVIRONMENT 2 1. Executive Summary Background 70% of countries in the region have a low utilization of past allocations In May 2018, Program Finance assessed corporate absorption rates across the Global Fund portfolio. Against the target Key Performance Indicator of 90%, the assessment highlighted that the Western and Central African (WCA) countries are below target. While some countries were very close to meeting the KPI, many of the countries in WCA were far off: Eleven Countries are between 70-90%; and Six countries are below 70% (Mali, Chad, Liberia, Congo, Mauritania, Gabon) The assessment suggested that there are potential opportunities to improve portfolio performance and therefore grant absorption of countries within the Western and Central Africa region. It also pointed out that some of the reasons for the low absorption are DISEASE LANDSCAPE specific to the region and not sufficiently understood to enable the development of effective solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • HONEY EXPORTS from TANZANIA BUSINESS PROCESS ANALYSIS for ENHANCED EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS Digital Images on Cover: © Thinkstock.Com
    HONEY EXPORTS FROM TANZANIA BUSINESS PROCESS ANALYSIS FOR ENHANCED EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS Digital images on cover: © thinkstock.com The designations employed and the presentation of material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Trade Centre concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This document has not formally been edited by the International Trade Centre. HONEY EXPORTS FROM TANZANIA Acknowledgments Ms. Namsifu Nyagabona is the author of this report. She was assisted by Mr. Christian Ksoll, International Consultant. They are wholly responsible for the information and views stated in the report. The consultants’ team acknowledges with gratitude the contributions of a number of people towards the process of this business process analysis (BPA), without whose participation the project would not have succeeded. In particular, we would like to express our gratitude and appreciation to Ben Czapnik and Giles Chappell of the Trade Facilitation and Policy for Business (TFPB) Section at the International Trade Centre (ITC), for their overall oversight, feedback and in-depth comments and guidance from the inception to the finishing of the report. We express our gratitude and thanks to the people whom we interviewed in the process of collecting information for the report. We also express our gratitude and thanks to the persons we have interviewed for the study, along with the participants in the workshop organized by the International Trade Centre (ITC) on 25 February 2016 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Evaluation of the Response of Vegetation Dynamics to Climate Variability in Africa
    sustainability Article Assessment and Evaluation of the Response of Vegetation Dynamics to Climate Variability in Africa Vincent Nzabarinda 1,2,3 , Anming Bao 1,2, Wenqiang Xu 1,2,*, Solange Uwamahoro 1,2,3, Liangliang Jiang 4, Yongchao Duan 5, Lamek Nahayo 6 , Tao Yu 1,2,3, Ting Wang 1,2,3 and Gang Long 1,2,3 1 State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China; [email protected] (V.N.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (S.U.); [email protected] (T.Y.); [email protected] (T.W.); [email protected] (G.L.) 2 Key Laboratory of GIS & RS Application Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830011, China 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 4 School of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China; [email protected] 5 Binjiang College, Nanjing University of Information Engineering, Nanjing 210044, China; [email protected] 6 Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Lay Adventists of Kigali, 6392 Kigali, Rwanda; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Understanding the impacts of climate variability and change on terrestrial ecosystems in Africa remains a critical issue for ecology as well as for regional and global climate policy mak- ing. However, acquiring this knowledge can be useful for future predictions towards improved governance for sustainable development. In this study, we analyzed the spatial–temporal charac- teristics of vegetation greenness, and identified the possible relationships with climatic factors and vulnerable plant species across Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Dodoma, Tanzania and Socialist Modernity
    The Rationalization of Space and Time: Dodoma, Tanzania and Socialist Modernity The categories of space and time are crucial variables in the constitution of what many scholars deem as modernity. However, due to the almost exclusive interpretation of space and time as components of a modernity coupled with global capitalism (Harvey 1990; Jameson 1991), discussions of a socialist space and time as a construction of an alternate modernity during the 60s and 70s—in particular across the Third World—have been neglected. Julius Nyerere’s project of collectivization, or ujamaa , in Tanzania during this period is a prime example of an attempt to develop the nation-state outside of the capitalist format. While it would be interesting to explore the connections Nyerere had with other socialist Third World countries, like China, within the international context, and their attempts at nation-building, this paper will focus on an analysis of the Tanzanian government’s decision in 1973 to move the capital of the country from the Eastern port city of Dar es Salaam to the more centrally located Dodoma. Although the Tanzanian government never completed the majority of the buildings analyzed in this paper due to a lack of funds and a diminishing political will, the exhaustive blueprinting and documentation does provide a glimpse into the conception of an African socialist modernity. The questions of primary importance are: How did moving the Tanzanian capital from Dar es Salaam to Dodoma embody Nyerere’s vision of socialist African development? Or more specifically, how did the socialist urban planning of Dodoma fit into the greater project of ujamaa and rural development? And finally, how was the planned construction of a new urban capital an attempt at a definition of socialist space and time? 1 Space, Time, and Homo Economicus In his seminal work, The Condition of Postmodernity , David Harvey explains why the categories of space and time are constantly cited as the primary way to understand a transformation in a human being’s relationship with his or her surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • International Currency Codes
    Country Capital Currency Name Code Afghanistan Kabul Afghanistan Afghani AFN Albania Tirana Albanian Lek ALL Algeria Algiers Algerian Dinar DZD American Samoa Pago Pago US Dollar USD Andorra Andorra Euro EUR Angola Luanda Angolan Kwanza AOA Anguilla The Valley East Caribbean Dollar XCD Antarctica None East Caribbean Dollar XCD Antigua and Barbuda St. Johns East Caribbean Dollar XCD Argentina Buenos Aires Argentine Peso ARS Armenia Yerevan Armenian Dram AMD Aruba Oranjestad Aruban Guilder AWG Australia Canberra Australian Dollar AUD Austria Vienna Euro EUR Azerbaijan Baku Azerbaijan New Manat AZN Bahamas Nassau Bahamian Dollar BSD Bahrain Al-Manamah Bahraini Dinar BHD Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladeshi Taka BDT Barbados Bridgetown Barbados Dollar BBD Belarus Minsk Belarussian Ruble BYR Belgium Brussels Euro EUR Belize Belmopan Belize Dollar BZD Benin Porto-Novo CFA Franc BCEAO XOF Bermuda Hamilton Bermudian Dollar BMD Bhutan Thimphu Bhutan Ngultrum BTN Bolivia La Paz Boliviano BOB Bosnia-Herzegovina Sarajevo Marka BAM Botswana Gaborone Botswana Pula BWP Bouvet Island None Norwegian Krone NOK Brazil Brasilia Brazilian Real BRL British Indian Ocean Territory None US Dollar USD Bandar Seri Brunei Darussalam Begawan Brunei Dollar BND Bulgaria Sofia Bulgarian Lev BGN Burkina Faso Ouagadougou CFA Franc BCEAO XOF Burundi Bujumbura Burundi Franc BIF Cambodia Phnom Penh Kampuchean Riel KHR Cameroon Yaounde CFA Franc BEAC XAF Canada Ottawa Canadian Dollar CAD Cape Verde Praia Cape Verde Escudo CVE Cayman Islands Georgetown Cayman Islands Dollar KYD _____________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]