Bruxelles, 2016 Art and Literature Scientific and Analytical Journal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bruxelles, 2016 Art and Literature Scientific and Analytical Journal Art and Literature Scientific and Analytical Journal Texts 2.2016 Bruxelles, 2016 EDITORIAL BOARD Chief editor Burganova M. A. Bowlt John Ellis (USA) — Doctor of Science, Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures in University of Southern California; Burganov A. N. (Russia) — Doctor of Science, Professor of Stroganoff Moscow State Art Industrial University, Full-member of Russia Academy of Arts, National Artist of Russia, member of the Dissertation Council of Stroganoff Moscow State Art Industrial University; Burganova M. A. (Russia) — Doctor of Science, Professor of Stroganoff Moscow State Art Industrial University, Full-member of Russia Academy of Arts, Honored Artist of Russia, member of the Dissertation Council of Stroganoff Moscow State Art Industrial University, editor-in-chief; Glanc Tomáš (Germany) — Doctor of Science of The Research Institute of East European University of Bremen (Germany), and assistant professor of The Charles University (Czech Republic); Kazarian Armen (Russia) — Architectural historian, Doctor of Fine Arts in The State Institute of Art History, Advisor in Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences; Kravetsky A. G. (Russia) — Candidate of Sciences, research associate of Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Lavrentyev Alexander N. (Russia) — Doctor of Arts, Professor of Stroganoff Moscow State Art Industrial University and Moscow State University of Printing Arts; Alessandro De Magistris (Italy) — PhD, Full-Professor of History of Architecture Politecnico di Milano Department of Architecture and Urban Studies; Misler Nicoletta (Italy) — Professor of Modern East European Art at the Istituto Universitario Orientale, Naples; Pavlova I. B. (Russia) — Candidate of Sciences, Senior Researcher of Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences; ISSN 2294-8902 © TEXTS, 2016 Pletneva A. A. (Russia) — Candidate of Sciences, research associate of Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Pociechina Helena (Poland) — Doctor of Science; Profesor of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn; Pruzhinin B. I. (Russia) — Doctor of Sciences, Professor, editor-in- chief of Problems of Philosophy; Ryzhinsky A. S. (Russia) — Candidate of Sciences, Senior lecturer of Gnesins Russian Academy of Music; Sahno I. M. (Russia) — Doctor of Sciences, Professor of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; Sano Koji (Japan) — Professor of Toho Gakuyen University of Music; Shvidkovsky Dmitry O. (Russia) — Vice-President of Russian Academy of Arts and its secretary for History of Arts, and Full member; Rector of Moscow Institute of Architecture, Doctor of Science, Professor, Full member of Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, Full member of the British Academy; Tanehisa Otabe (Japan) — Doctor of Sience, Professor, Head of Department of Aesthetics at Tokyo; Tolstoy Andrey V. (Russia) — Doctor of Sciences, professor in the History of Art at the Moscow State Institute of Architecture, a Full member of the Russian Academy of Fine Arts and President of the Russian National section of International Association of Art Critics (AICA) affiliated with UNESCO; Tsivian Yuri (USA) — Doctor of Science, Professor, University of Chicago, Departments: Cinema and Media Studies, Art History, Slavic Languages and Literatures; Editor Smolenkova J. (Russia) TABLE OF CONTENTS Barbara S. Muratova Germany Romanesque sculpture. Saxon school 6 Maria A. Burganova Sculpture of the Russian Provinces in the 18th Century 15 Frans C. Lemaire D’une condamnation à l’autre 1932—1936. L’opéra La Lady Macbeth du district de Mzensk. Du succès à l’interdiction 51 Olga V. Kostina “The Moscow Metro is the Best in the World” 64 Sofiya D. Tugarinova In search of high-rise centerpiece: The Palace of the Soviets project development in the 1930s 91 Irina М. Sakhno Livre d’artiste as an isoverbal text in the culture of Symbolism 105 Ekaterina V. Matveeva Language Alter Ego — myth or reality? The concept based on the studies of the linguistic personality and the relations of power 123 Barbara S. Muratova. Germany Romanesque sculpture. Saxon school Barbara S. Muratova Department of Theory and History of Decorative Arts and Design Stroganov Moscow State Art Industrial Academy e-mail: [email protected] Moscow, Russia GERMANY ROMANESQUE SCULPTURE. SAXON SCHOOL Summary: The article concerns the theme of German monumental Romanesque sculpture in the context of Saxon school. The particularity and features of sculptural churches adornment are regarded on the examples of the Church of St. Michael in Hildesheim and the church of St. Servatius in Quedlinburg, which represent the most remarkable monuments and allow studying both different and similar aspects in the context of one school. Keywords: Romanesque sculpture, Saxon, churches, architecture, capitals, friezes. Saxon school took the path of change to the Romanesque style earlier than other schools and was influenced by the Carolingian art. In fact, it became a herald of the beginning of Romanesque style in Germany. The founders of a new empire Saxon Ottonian dynasty made first steps to the new style1. Numerous buildings of their time were reconstructed and largely did not survive in their original form. Constructive features of Saxon churches permit to talk about complex and consistent path of their development. First, the features descending from the early Christian architecture can be clearly seen. It expresses in a wide extended main space divided into three naves. The central nave is raised above the lateral ones; the upper part is cut with windows. Central and lateral naves are separated from each other with the rows of pillars and columns. At the same time such an alternation is an own peculiarity of the buildings of this region. The supports in the space of church create slow and regular rhythm based on the alternation of massive pillars and light columns. — 6 — Barbara S. Muratova. Germany Romanesque sculpture. Saxon school Many Romanesque churches with wonderful examples of sculpture remain on the territory of Saxony. The Church of St. Michael in Hildesheim and the church of St. Servatius in Quedlinburg are the most remarkable monuments that allow studying both different and similar aspects in the context of one school. One of the most significant buildings, belonging to the pre- Romanesque period is the Church of St. Michael in Hildesheim (1010— 1230) that marked the formation of the Saxon school. The entrance to the church is situated not on the end, but on the longitudinal side of the mane space of the church. Over the two intersections of the main nave with transepts are two massive towers. The decoration of the majority of medieval churches has not reached our times intact. It concerns also the Church of St. Michael in Hildesheim. When you are in the space of the main nave, you can note a disjoint character of the columns with its general stylistic unity. They have a definite rhythm: two massive square pillars set off two columns. The columns terminate with relief capitals, of a similar type with Byzantine. Each subsequent capital differs from the previous one by the character of its decoration. Some capitals preserve their appearance, which is typical for the Ottonian period: they are square and do not have sculpture. Later capitals belonging to the Romanesque period are notable for their developed decoration. The tradition of decoration with plant motives is very strong in the plastics of the Church of St. Michael in Hildesheim capitals. The anthropomorphic and zoomorphic images have a secondary role, at one moment they look out from the undergrowth of acanthus leaves, at another they become woven into a common ornamental rhythm. The relief is high, it forms a particular compound profiling of the capitals. An ornamental plane frieze is on the abacus, on which there are almost heraldic compositions. If we look at capitals of the columns of the central nave, we can note that the sculptor’s attention is not focused on creating a scene image, because all his efforts are directed to ornamental and decorative elements. In its decoration, we can see the division into stages. In the lower part the wide leaves of the soft acanthus, the relief is high so there is a feeling of its hang down from a column volume. The second — 7 — Barbara S. Muratova. Germany Romanesque sculpture. Saxon school stage represents an alternation of smaller leaves of acanthus and human heads. All heads are not equivalent. On each side of a square capital is situated one central head and two in the corners. The faces are very graphic, plane, their eyes are big, and in some cases, they are open, in others — ​closed. Gradually the stages get smaller conformable to the construction of the capital. On the last stage, we can see thin line of plant elements. In the heads images can be noted an ancient tradition of the defending sculpture, the faces were directed to the four cardinal points to prevent any danger. Two buds are located above the head of each character in the second stage, striking with detail and authenticity of the image coupled with all its graphic quality. Such type of relief could have been borrowed from France where the sculpture was closer to the nature. On the abacus is placed low relief, once again referring to the motives of acanthus. At this time, the leaves are cut in stone; they appear on the surface as a graphic pattern. The composition of the capital is very logical: with the expansion of its volume up, the decor becomes more flat, creating the correct shape of a square and filling the voids. In general, the capital with its Romanesque precise configuration is vaguely reminiscent of the Corinthian order, with its love of the acanthus leaf image. Human heads in the corners capitals look like curls of volutes. Sculptural decoration of the fence of the choir in the eastern part of the church dates by the later period (the beginning of the XIII century). Located on both sides, north and south, they are two very different phenomena.
Recommended publications
  • Design Competition Brief
    Design Competition Brief The Museum of the 20th Century Berlin, June 2016 Publishing data Design competition brief compiled by: ARGE WBW-M20 Schindler Friede Architekten, Salomon Schindler a:dks mainz berlin, Marc Steinmetz On behalf of: Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz (SPK) Von-der-Heydt-Straße 16-18 10785 Berlin Date / as of: 24/06/2016 Design Competition Brief The Museum of the 20th Century Part A Competition procedure ..............................................................................5 A.1 Occasion and objective .......................................................................................... 6 A.2 Parties involved in the procedure ........................................................................... 8 A.3 Competition procedure .......................................................................................... 9 A.4 Eligibility ............................................................................................................... 11 A.5 Jury, appraisers, preliminary review ...................................................................... 15 A.6 Competition documents ....................................................................................... 17 A.7 Submission requirements ...................................................................................... 18 A.8 Queries ................................................................................................................. 20 A.9 Submission of competition entries and preliminary review .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ar204 Art and Interpretation
    AR204 ART AND INTERPRETATION Art and Aesthetics Module: Art Objects and Experience Fall 2019 Seminar Leader: Geoff Lehman Course Times: Wednesday, 9:00- 10:30 and Friday, 10:45-12:15 (9:00-12:15 for museum visits) Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Tuesdays, 14:00-16:00 Course Description Describing a painting, the art historian Leo Steinberg wrote: “The picture conducts itself the way a vital presence behaves. It creates an encounter.” In this course, we will encounter works of art to explore the specific dialogue each creates with a viewer and the range of interpretive possibilities it offers. More specifically, the course will examine various interpretive approaches to art, including formal analysis, iconography, social and historical contextualism, aestheticism, phenomenology, and psychoanalysis. Most importantly, we will engage interpretation in ways that are significant both within art historical discourse and in addressing larger questions of human experience and (self- )knowledge, considering the dialogue with the artwork in its affective (emotional) as well as its intellectual aspects. The course will be guided throughout by sustained discussion of a small number of individual artworks, with a focus on pictorial representation (painting, drawing, photography), although sculpture and installation art will also be considered. We will look at works from a range of different cultural traditions, and among the artists we will focus on are Xia Gui, Giorgione, Bruegel, Mirza Ali, Velázquez, Hokusai, Manet, Picasso, Man Ray, Martin, and Sherman. Readings will focus on texts in art history and theory but also include philosophical and psychoanalytic texts (Pater, Wölfflin, Freud, Merleau-Ponty, Barthes, Clark, and Krauss, among others).
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiberartoral00lakyrich.Pdf
    University of California Berkeley Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Gyongy Laky FIBER ART: VISUAL THINKING AND THE INTELLIGENT HAND With an Introduction by Kenneth R. Trapp Interviews Conducted by Harriet Nathan in 1998-1999 Copyright 2003 by The Regents of the University of California has been Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Gyongy Laky, dated October 21, 1999. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 324 International Conference on Architecture: Heritage, Traditions and Innovations (AHTI 2019) Architects of Russian Emigration in Rome Between Two Wars: Questions of Integration and Ways of Adaptation* Anna Vyazemtseva Scientific Research Institute of the Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning Branch of the Central Scientific-Research and Project Institute of the Construction Ministry of Russia Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract—At the beginning of the 20th century, lots of further outstanding career1 in Moscow, was isolated. At the young and promising Russian architects travelled to Italy, beginning of the 1920s in Rome, like other cities of Europe interpreting gained experience in projects and buildings (V.F. and the world, there was a strong presence of Russian Shuko, I.A. Fomin), and some of them even had building immigrants, represented above all by high and cultured practices there (A. Schusev). After the October Revolution of social classes: aristocracy, bourgeoisie and intelligentsia. 1917 many actors of creative professions leaved Russia, but the While emigrated architects were rather few, most of the architects were in the minority among immigrants and only a professionals remained in patria, trying to adapt their work to few of them settled (A.Y. Beloborodov, L.M. Brailovsky) or the new conditions. constantly worked (G.K. Lukomsky) in Italy. The paper tries to analyze the careers of the mentioned and other architects, to In early 1920s the trips to Italy sometime turned in describe the particular circumstances of their work in the emigration. In 1923 Ivan Zholtovsky, at the moment the conditions of emigration, to determine their place in the Italian director of the work on the new Moscow master plan and and international professional culture of that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Architecture & Ideology: Modernism As a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union
    Momentum Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 6 2018 Modern Architecture & Ideology: Modernism as a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union Robert Levine University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/momentum Recommended Citation Levine, Robert (2018) "Modern Architecture & Ideology: Modernism as a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union," Momentum: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/momentum/vol5/iss1/6 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/momentum/vol5/iss1/6 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Architecture & Ideology: Modernism as a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union Abstract This paper examines the role of architecture in the promotion of political ideologies through the study of modern architecture in the 20th century. First, it historicizes the development of modern architecture and establishes the style as a tool to convey progressive thought; following this perspective, the paper examines Swedish Functionalism and Constructivism in the Soviet Union as two case studies exploring how politicians react to modern architecture and the ideas that it promotes. In Sweden, Modernism’s ideals of moving past “tradition,” embracing modernity, and striving to improve life were in lock step with the folkhemmet, unleashing the nation from its past and ushering it into the future. In the Soviet Union, on the other hand, these ideals represented an ideological threat to Stalin’s totalitarian state. This thesis or dissertation is available in Momentum: https://repository.upenn.edu/momentum/vol5/iss1/6 Levine: Modern Architecture & Ideology Modern Architecture & Ideology Modernism as a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union Robert Levine, University of Pennsylvania C'17 Abstract This paper examines the role of architecture in the promotion of political ideologies through the study of modern architecture in the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release George Condo
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE GEORGE CONDO: NEW WORKS OPENING RECEPTION: APRIL 27, 6-8PM 20 East 79th Street, New York Skarstedt is pleased to present George Condo: New Works, an exhibition of new sculptures and paintings on view from April 27 – June 24, 2017 at Skarstedt Upper East Side, 20 East 79th Street, New York, NY 10075. In December 2014 Condo began working on Origin, a small wood sculpture he hand-painted, cut, and glued together. Origin soon became the subject of three larger-scaled variations in bronze. These variations represent a return to methods of sculpting that the artist first took up with his earliest three-dimensional works in the late 1980s—using wood, clay, plaster, paint, fabric, and found objects to create bronze sculptures that incorporate both figurative and abstract elements. Here we see Condo’s concept of the “simulated found object,” which he explored in his earliest exhibited paintings in the 1980s, combined with the use of real found objects from his studio into entirely new figurative forms in bronze. Condo cuts, screws, and hinges together flat surfaces of plywood into angular figurative representations then applies layers of plaster, clay and paint squeezed directly from the tube, “knowing that once cast in bronze all of my markings will remain present and be reinvigorated in the patinated surfaces,” the artist says. Writing in 2015 on the subject of what he referred to as Condo’s “unedited human disasters,” Simon Baker described his sculptures as having: “the barest suggestion of anatomical specificity barely distinguishable from the raw materials from which they were produced, but as with Condo’s work in every medium, openly manifesting a dramatic and irrepressible joy in the process of production.” (Simon Baker, Painting Reconfigured, pg.
    [Show full text]
  • AR204 Art and Interpretation
    AR204 Art and Interpretation Art and Aesthetics Module: Art Objects and Experience Fall 2018 Seminar Leader: Geoff Lehman Course Times: Wednesday,14:00- 15:30 and Friday, 14:00-15:30 (until 17:15 for museum visits) Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Tuesdays, 14:00-16:00 Course Description Describing a painting, the art historian Leo Steinberg wrote: “The picture conducts itself the way a vital presence behaves. It creates an encounter.” In this course, we will encounter works of art to explore the specific dialogue each creates with a viewer and the range of interpretive possibilities it offers. More specifically, the course will examine various interpretive approaches to art, including formal analysis, iconography, social and historical contextualism, aestheticism, phenomenology, and psychoanalysis. Most importantly, we will engage interpretation in ways that are significant both within art historical discourse and in addressing larger questions of human experience and (self- )knowledge, considering the dialogue with the artwork in its affective (emotional) as well as its intellectual aspects. The course will be guided throughout by sustained discussion of a small number of individual artworks, with a focus on pictorial representation (painting, drawing, photography), although sculpture and installation art will also be considered. We will look at works from a range of different cultural traditions, and among the artists we will focus on are Xia Gui, Giorgione, Bruegel, Mirza Ali, Velázquez, Hokusai, Manet, Picasso, Man Ray, Martin, and Sherman. Readings will focus on texts in art history and theory but also include philosophical and psychoanalytic texts (Pater, Wölfflin, Freud, Merleau-Ponty, Barthes, Clark, and Krauss, among others).
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title To the New Shore: Soviet Architecture's Journey from Classicism to Standardization Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3k42j0g2 Author Zubovich, Katherine Publication Date 2013-07-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California To the New Shore: Soviet Architecture’s Journey from Classicism to Standardization Katherine Zubovich-Eady Summer 2013 Katherine Zubovich-Eady is a PhD Candidate in the Department of History at the University of California, Berkeley. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Yuri Slezkine and the participants in his Fall 2011 Soviet History research paper class for their comments on earlier versions of this essay. I would also like to thank Professor Andrew Shanken, whose generous comments on my essay graphic design in Arkhitektura SSSR have made their way into this paper. Figure 1: “K novomu beregu,” Arkhitektura SSSR, November 1955. To the New Shore: Soviet Architecture’s Journey from Classicism to Standardization In November 1955, the leading Soviet architects’ journal, Arkhitektura SSSR, featured a “friendly cartoon” (druzheskii sharzh) satirizing the uncertain state of the architectural profession (Fig. 1). Titled “To the New Shore,” this image showed the greats of Soviet architecture as they prepared to embark on a journey away from the errors of their past work. “After a lengthy and expensive stay on the island of excesses,” the cartoonists explained in their narrative printed alongside the image, “the architectural flotilla is preparing itself, at last, to depart for the long- awaited shore of standardization and industrialization in construction.”1 At the lower right of the cartoon, three of the architects of Moscow’s vysotnye zdaniia say goodbye “from the bottom of their hearts to their excesses (izlishestva),”2 which they have been prohibited from taking on board.
    [Show full text]
  • Picasso's Sculpture Head of a Woman
    PICASSO’S SCULPTURE HEAD OF A WOMAN (FERNANDE) 1909: A COLLABORATIVE TECHNICAL STUDY Renzo Leonardi • Derek Pullen • Colloque Picasso Sculptures • 25 mars 2016 Laser equipment, scan, photogrammetry and data elab- oration by: Erica Nocerino, Fabio Menna, Belen Jime- nez Fernandez-Palacios, Alessandro Rizzi, (Fondazione Bruno Kessler 3DOM Lab, Trento, Dir. F. Remondino). today is known as Head of a Woman (Fernande), or simply Fernande. According to his own inscription he two plaster sculptures that are the main sub- on the back of a photograph,3 Picasso modelled the Tject of this essay were first exhibited together in sculpture in the studio of his friend, the sculptor October 2003 at the National Gallery, Washington Manolo (Manuel Hugué). But it was sometime later, DC. (fig 1) In her seminal essay “Process and Tech- at an unknown date, (Fletcher suggests “in or soon nique in Picasso’s Head of a Woman (Fernande)” in after September 1910”), that the art dealer Ambroise the catalogue of the exhibition1, Dr Valerie Fletcher, Vollard purchased the model from Picasso, together chief curator at the Hirshhorn Museum, qualified her with the rights of reproduction. insights into the sculptures with, “bear in mind that Even in the absence of detailed documentation, it is no scientific analyses have been done on any of the possible to outline the probable steps by which the works discussed—perhaps my efforts will engender original model was transformed into the first bronze. such examinations in the near future”. We describe The clay4 model was probably destroyed (washed how we accepted her challenge and, drawing on her out from a plaster “waste” mold) during the process initial research, investigated the two plaster casts and of making the master or primary plaster.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spatial Cosmology of the Stalin Cult: Ritual, Myth and Metanarrative
    Anderson, Jack (2018) The spatial cosmology of the Stalin Cult: ritual, myth and metanarrative. MRes thesis. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/30631/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] School of History, College of Arts University of Glasgow The Spatial Cosmology of the Stalin Cult Ritual, Myth and Metanarrative Jack Anderson Submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of MRes in History To my Mum, Gran and Grandad – without their support I would not have been able to study. Thanks to Ryan and Robyn for proof reading my work at numerous stages. And also, to my supervisors Maud and Alex, for engaging with my area of study; their input and guidance has been intellectually stimulating throughout my time at Glasgow. 2 Abstract: This paper will focus on Stalin’s use of Soviet space throughout the 1930s and the relationship this had with the developing Stalin cult. In the thirties, Stalin had consolidated power and from as early as 1929 the Stalin cult was beginning to emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2017 • V
    October 2017 • v. 57, n. 5 NewsNet News of the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies Article Written: 1917 for 2017 Kristin Romberg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign When the editors of NewsNet asked me months ago to digging in archives and carefully crafting a narrative to contribute something on the current state of scholarship about how the revolution mattered (in my case, to aesthetic about art produced in the context of the Russian Revolution, modernism), it has been a giddy delight to see the issues I planned to write about the repositioning of the field that motivate my work actually matter both to a broader in the past ten years; how the receding relevance of the audience and in relation to world events. At the same time, Cold War paradigms that once made our work “topical” that brighter spotlight and larger pool of participants have in Title VIII terms has been as much an opportunity as a been accompanied by the discomfort of misrecognition challenge; how a decreasing appetite for Manichean hero/ and the awkward illumination of some of the quirks of villain structures has allowed new figures, histories, and academe. The disciplinary boundaries and psychological questions to become visible and opened up a new set of compartmentalizations that gird scholarly endeavors discursive frames. As I sat down to write, however, the (in my opinion, necessarily) appear less like an infinite ghosts all returned in the form of the question that haunts horizon and more like the “silos” that administrators keep this centennial year: how do we think about the Russian telling us that they are.
    [Show full text]