DOCSLIB.ORG

A Kárpát–Pannon-Térség Változó Etnikai Arculata a 15. Század Végétől a 21

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Kárpát–Pannon-Térség Változó Etnikai Arculata a 15. Század Végétől a 21 A Kárpát–Pannon-térség változó etnikai arculata a 15. század végétől a 21. század elejéig Changing Ethnic Patterns of the Carpatho–Pannonian Area from the Late 15th until the Early 21st Century TÉRKÉPMAGYARÁZÓ / ACCOMPANYING TEXT 3., átdolgozott és bővített kiadás / 3rd, revised and enlarged edition Készítette / by KOCSIS Károly, TÁTRAI Patrik, AGÁRDI Norbert, BALIZS Dániel, KOVÁCS Anikó Budapest, 2015 Szerzők / Authors KOCSIS Károly, TÁTRAI Patrik, AGÁRDI Norbert, BALIZS Dániel, KOVÁCS Anikó Lektorálta / Revised by GERCSÁK Gábor, KLINGHAMMER István, TINER Tibor Angol fordítás / English translation NEMESNÉ KOVÁCS Ivett, Andrew GANE Tipográfia / Typography GARAI-ÉDLER Eszter Felelős kiadó / Publisher: Ábrahám Péter főigazgató Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Csillagászati és Földtudományi Kutatóközpont Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences © MTA CSFK Földrajztudományi Intézet, Budapest, 2015 © MTA RCAES Geographical Institute, Budapest, 2015 www.mtafki.hu Tartalom 1. Bevezető ...................................................................................................................................................................................................4 1.1. A vizsgált terület (Kárpát-medence, Kárpát–Pannon-térség) ..........................................................................................4 1.2. A jelen térképegyüttes adatbázisa, ábrázolási módszerei ................................................................................................4 2. A Kárpát-medence változó etnikai arculata ...............................................................................................................................6 2.1. A 15. század végétől a 18. század végéig ..............................................................................................................................6 2.2. A 18. század végétől 1918-ig ...................................................................................................................................................7 2.3. 1918-tól a 21. század elejéig ....................................................................................................................................................7 2.4. Etnikai térszerkezet a 21. század elején ...............................................................................................................................9 2.4.1. Magyarország ....................................................................................................................................................................9 2.4.2. Szlovákia ..........................................................................................................................................................................0 2.4.3. Kárpátalja (Ukrajna)........................................................................................................................................................ 2.4.4. Erdély (Románia) ............................................................................................................................................................. 2.4.5. Vajdaság (Szerbia) ............................................................................................................................................................ 2.4.6. Horvátország pannon területe ......................................................................................................................................... 2.4.7. Muravidék (Szlovénia) .................................................................................................................................................... 2.4.8. Őrvidék (Ausztria) ..........................................................................................................................................................4 3. A Kárpát-medencével szomszédos területek változó etnikai arculata ..........................................................................4 3.1. Ausztria ....................................................................................................................................................................................4 3.2. Csehország ...............................................................................................................................................................................4 3.3. Lengyelország..........................................................................................................................................................................5 3.4. Ukrajna .....................................................................................................................................................................................5 3.5. Románia....................................................................................................................................................................................6 3.6. Szerbia ......................................................................................................................................................................................6 3.7. Bosznia és Hercegovina .........................................................................................................................................................7 3.8. Szlovénia ..................................................................................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................................8 1.1. The study area (Carpathian Basin, Carpatho–Pannonian area) .....................................................................................8 1.2. Data base and cartographic representation .......................................................................................................................8 2. Ethnic patterns of the Carpathian Basin ...................................................................................................................................0 2.1. From the late 15th century until the late 18th century ........................................................................................................20 2.2 From the late 18th century until 1918 .................................................................................................................................... 2.3. From 1918 until the early 21st century ................................................................................................................................. 2.4. Ethnic structure in the early 21st century ............................................................................................................................ 2.4.1. Hungary .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2.4.2. Slovakia ............................................................................................................................................................................4 2.4.3. Transcarpathia (Ukraine) ................................................................................................................................................5 2.4.4. Transylvania (Romania) ..................................................................................................................................................5 2.4.5. Vojvodina (Serbia) ............................................................................................................................................................7 2.4.6. Pannonian Croatia ...........................................................................................................................................................7 2.4.7. Transmura Region (Slovenia) ..........................................................................................................................................8 2.4.8. Burgenland (Austria) ......................................................................................................................................................8 3. Ethnic patterns of the neighbourhood areas............................................................................................................................8 3.1. Austria ......................................................................................................................................................................................8 3.2. Czech Republic .......................................................................................................................................................................8 3.3. Poland .......................................................................................................................................................................................9 3.4. Ukraine .....................................................................................................................................................................................30 3.5. Romania.................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.6. Serbia .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Generated an Epistemological Knowledge of the Nation—Quantifying And
    H-Nationalism The “Majority Question” in Interwar Romania: Making Majorities from Minorities in a Heterogeneous State Discussion published by Emmanuel Dalle Mulle on Wednesday, April 22, 2020 H-Nationalism is proud to publish here the sixth post of its “Minorities in Contemporary and Historical Perspectives” series, which looks at majority- minority relations from a multi-disciplinary and diachronic angle. Today’s contribution, by R. Chris Davis (Lone Star College–Kingwood), examines the efforts of Romanian nation-builders to make Romanians during the interwar period. Heterogeneity in Interwar Romania While the situation of ethnic minorities in Romania has been examined extensively within the scholarship on the interwar period, far too little consideration is given into the making of the Romanian ethnic majority itself. My reframing of the “minority question” into its corollary, the “majority question,” in this blogpost draws on my recently published book examining the contested identity of the Moldavian Csangos, an ethnically fluid community of Romanian- and Hungarian-speaking Roman Catholics in eastern Romania.[1] While investigating this case study of a putative ethnic, linguistic, and religious minority, I was constantly reminded that not only minorities but also majorities are socially constructed, crafted from regional, religious, and linguistic bodies and identities. Transylvanians, Bessarabians, and Bănățeni (people from the Banat region) and Regațeni (inhabitants of Romania’s Old Kingdom), for example, were rendered into something
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL HERITAGE in MIGRATION Published Within the Project Cultural Heritage in Migration
    CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Published within the project Cultural Heritage in Migration. Models of Consolidation and Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Communities Abroad funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund © Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova, Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova, editors, 2017 © Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum – BAS, 2017 © Paradigma Publishing House, 2017 ISBN 978-954-326-332-5 BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ETHNOLOGY AND FOLKLORE STUDIES WITH ETHNOGRAPHIC MUSEUM CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Edited by Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova Paradigma Sofia • 2017 CONTENTS EDITORIAL............................................................................................................................9 PART I: CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A PROCESS DISPLACEMENT – REPLACEMENT. REAL AND INTERNALIZED GEOGRAPHY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MIGRATION............................................21 Slobodan Dan Paich THE RUSSIAN-LIPOVANS IN ITALY: PRESERVING CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS HERITAGE IN MIGRATION.............................................................41 Nina Vlaskina CLASS AND RELIGION IN THE SHAPING OF TRADITION AMONG THE ISTANBUL-BASED ORTHODOX BULGARIANS...............................55 Magdalena Elchinova REPRESENTATIONS OF ‘COMPATRIOTISM’. THE SLOVAK DIASPORA POLITICS AS A TOOL FOR BUILDING AND CULTIVATING DIASPORA.............72 Natália Blahová FOLKLORE AS HERITAGE: THE EXPERIENCE OF BULGARIANS IN HUNGARY.......................................................................................................................88
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union’s East Border Brie, Mircea and Horga, Ioan and Şipoş, Sorin University of Oradea, Romania 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44082/ MPRA Paper No. 44082, posted 31 Jan 2013 05:28 UTC ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER Mircea BRIE Ioan HORGA Sorin ŞIPOŞ (Coordinators) Debrecen/Oradea 2011 This present volume contains the papers of the international conference Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union‟s East Border, held in Oradea between 2nd-5th of June 2011, organized by Institute for Euroregional Studies Oradea-Debrecen, University of Oradea and Department of International Relations and European Studies, with the support of the European Commission and Bihor County Council. CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY STUDIES Mircea BRIE Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Dialogue in the European Border Space.......11 Ioan HORGA Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Education in the Curricula of European Studies .......19 MINORITY AND MAJORITY IN THE EASTERN EUROPEAN AREA Victoria BEVZIUC Electoral Systems and Minorities Representations in the Eastern European Area........31 Sergiu CORNEA, Valentina CORNEA Administrative Tools in the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Ethnic Minorities .............................................................................................................47
    [Show full text]
  • Ambiguous Attachments and Industrious Nostalgias Heritage
    Ambiguous Attachments and Industrious Nostalgias Heritage Narratives of Russian Old Believers in Romania Cristina Clopot Abstract: This article questions notions of belonging in the case of displaced communities’ descendants and discusses such groups’ efforts to preserve their heritage. It examines the instrumental use of nostalgia in heritage discourses that drive preservation efforts. The case study presented is focused on the Russian Old Believers in Romania. Their creativity in reforming heritage practices is considered in relation to heritage discourses that emphasise continuity. The ethnographic data presented in this article, derived from my doctoral research project, is focused on three major themes: language preservation, the singing tradition and the use of heritage for touristic purposes. Keywords: belonging, heritage, narratives, nostalgia, Romania, Russian Old Believers It was during a hot summer day in 2015 when, together with a group of informants, I visited a Russian Old Believers’ church in Climăuți, a Romanian village situated at the border with Ukraine (Figure 1).1 After attending a church service, our hosts proposed to visit a monument, an Old Believers’ cross situated a couple of kilometres away from the village. This ten-metre tall marble monument erected in memory of the forefathers, represents the connection with the past for Old Believers (Figure 2). At the base of the monument the following text is written in Russian: ‘Honour and glory to our Starovery Russian ancestors that settled in these places in defence of their Ancient orthodox faith’ (my translation). The text points to a precious memory central for the heritage narratives of Old Believers in Romania today that will be discussed in this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania - Adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018
    ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV(2017)005 Fourth Opinion on Romania - adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018 Summary The authorities in Romania promote respect and understanding in society and representatives of most national minorities report an overall embracing attitude prevailing between the majority and the minorities. The authorities have made efforts to promote minority cultures and education, and particular steps which have been taken to facilitate representation of national minorities in parliament are widely recognised and appreciated. The Law on Education remains the main legislative basis for teaching in and of national minority languages. A consolidated and coherent legal framework related to the protection of minority rights is lacking and the draft Law on the Status of National Minorities, proposed in parliament in 2006, has still not been adopted. Existing legislation regulating different aspects of national minority protection is disjointed, piecemeal, full of grey zones and open to contradictory interpretation. A coherent policy to guarantee access to minority rights is still lacking and respect of rights of persons belonging to national minorities varies according to local conditions and the goodwill of the municipal or regional authorities. Persistence of negative attitudes and prejudice against the Roma and anti-Hungarian sentiment is of considerable concern. Despite the resolute stance of the National Council for Combating Discrimination, court rulings and statements from the authorities, racist incidents continue to be reported. The revised Strategy for the Inclusion of Romanian Citizens Belonging to the Roma Minority – 2012-2020, adopted in 2015, sets targets in the key areas of education, employment, health and housing and addresses also promotion and protection of Roma culture and participation in public and political life.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Activism and Ethnic Intermediation in Post-Communist Romania
    Nationalities Papers (2021), 1–15 doi:10.1017/nps.2021.10 ARTICLE Institutional Activism and Ethnic Intermediation in Post-Communist Romania Daniel Fittante* Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract Existing studies on legal approaches to ethnic minority representation often highlight different systems’ strengths and weaknesses. While this scholarship provides important insights into the growing body of literature on minority representation, the topic remains largely under-theorized. Because systems of ethnic minority representation clarify the organizations and philosophies of diverse states, more theoretical analyses can enrich the descriptive literature. Building on the existing scholarship, this article assesses Romania’s particular version of proportional representation regarding designated national minorities. It applies two theoretical models: (1) institutional activism and (2) ethnic intermediation. The former clarifies the establishment of Romania’s post-communist constitutional provisions regarding minority organiza- tions, and the latter explains how small yet influential minority populations make claims to and reallocate resources from the Romanian state. Through a unique, understudied case study – the Armenian community of Romania – this article attempts to broaden ethnic minority representation scholarship by refining the theoretical frameworks of institutional activism and ethnic intermediation. Keywords: ethnic intermediation; institutional activism; reserved seats; thresholds; Romania; Armenian diaspora; post-communism Introduction More than 30 countries possess electoral laws that offer select ethnic groups a minimum number of political representatives in national parliament. At least ostensibly, these laws assist ethnic minorities in protecting and/or advancing their own interests, while also gaining a share of power within the state (Kymlicka 1995; Krook and O’Brien 2010; Bird 2014;Zuber2015).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethno-Cultural Belongingness of Aromanians, Vlachs, Catholics, and Lipovans/Old Believers in Romania and Bulgaria (1990–2012)
    CULTURĂ ŞI IDENTITATE NAŢIONALĂ THE ETHNO-CULTURAL BELONGINGNESS OF AROMANIANS, VLACHS, CATHOLICS, AND LIPOVANS/OLD BELIEVERS IN ROMANIA AND BULGARIA (1990–2012) MARIN CONSTANTIN∗ ABSTRACT This study is conceived as a historical and ethnographic contextualization of ethno-linguistic groups in contemporary Southeastern Europe, with a comparative approach of several transborder communities from Romania and Bulgaria (Aromanians, Catholics, Lipovans/Old Believers, and Vlachs), between 1990 and 2012. I am mainly interested in (1) presenting the ethno-demographic situation and geographic distribution of ethnic groups in Romania and Bulgaria, (2) repertorying the cultural traits characteristic for homonymous ethnic groups in the two countries, and (3) synthesizing the theoretical data of current anthropological literature on the ethno-cultural variability in Southeastern Europe. In essence, my methodology compares the ethno-demographic evolution in Romania and Bulgaria (192–2011), within the legislative framework of the two countries, to map afterward the distribution of ethnic groups across Romanian and Bulgarian regions. It is on such a ground that the ethnic characters will next be interpreted as either homologous between ethno-linguistic communities bearing identical or similar ethnonyms in both countries, or as interethnic analogies due to migration, coexistence, and acculturation among the same groups, while living in common or neighboring geographical areas. Keywords: ethnic characters, ethno-linguistic communities, cultural belongingness,
    [Show full text]
  • Ed Nations A/HRC/14/30/Add.2
    United Nations A/HRC/14/30/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 17 March 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council Fourteenth session Agenda item 10 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, Jorge Bustamante Addendum Mission to Romania* (15–20 June 2009) Summary The present report examines the protection of the human rights of migrants, placing Romania primarily as a country of origin and transit of migration flows, but also a country where labour immigration and asylum-seeking are emerging trends. It highlights the legal framework at the international, European and domestic levels, underscoring some gaps in the implementation of existing laws, and noting problematic policies. An analysis of major groups involved in the migrant phenomenon follows, including the Romanian diaspora, migrant workers, children left behind by migrating parents and victims of trafficking in persons. The report highlights key challenges, good practices and provides a number of recommendations. * The summary of this report is being circulated in all official languages. The report itself, contained in the annex to the summary, is being circulated in the language of submission and in French only. GE.10-12102 (E) 140410 A/HRC/14/30/Add.2 Annex Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, Jorge Bustamante, on his mission to Romania 15–20 June 2009 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–5 4 II. General background: The migration phenomenon in Romania............................... 6–27 4 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinship Terminology in Karashevo (Banat, Romania) // Slověne
    Patterns and Паттерны и Mechanisms of механизмы Lexical Changes in the лексических Languages of Symbiotic изменений в языках Communities: симбиотических Kinship Terminology сообществ: термины in Karashevo родства в Карашево (Banat, Romania) (Банат, Румыния) Daria V. Konior Дарья Владимировна Конёр The Institute for Linguistic Studies Институт лингвистических исследований of the Russian Academy of Sciences Российской академии наук St. Petersburg, Russia С.-Петербург, Россия Abstract This article deals with the ethnolinguistic situation in one of the most archaic areas of language and cultural contact between South Slavic and Eastern Ro- mance populations—the Karashevo microregion in Banat, Romania. For the fi rst time, the lexical-semantic group of kinship terms in the Krashovani dia- lects from the Slavic-speaking village of Carașova and the Romanian-speak- ing village of Iabalcea is being analysed in a comparative perspective as two Цитирование: Konior D. V. Patterns and Mechanisms of Lexical Changes in the Languages of Symbiotic Communities: Kinship Terminology in Karashevo (Banat, Romania) // Slověne. 2020. Vol. 9, № 1. C. 381–411. Citation: Konior D. V. (2019) Patterns and Mechanisms of Lexical Changes in the Languages of Symbiotic Communities: Kinship Terminology in Karashevo (Banat, Romania). Slověne, Vol. 9, № 1, p. 381–411. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.14 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 2020 №1 Slověne Patterns and Mechanisms of Lexical Changes in the Languages of Symbiotic Communities: 382 | Kinship Terminology in Karashevo (Banat, Romania) separate linguistic codes which “serve” the same local culture. The main goal of the research was to investigate patterns of borrowing mechanisms which could link lexical (sub)systems of spiritual culture under the conditions of in- timate language contact in symbiotic communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Folkloric Aspects of the Romanian Imaginary and Myth
    Folkloric Aspects of the Romanian Imaginary and Myth Folkloric Aspects of the Romanian Imaginary and Myth By Claudia Costin Folkloric Aspects of the Romanian Imaginary and Myth By Claudia Costin This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Claudia Costin All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-1111-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-1111-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................... vii Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 Calendar Holydays: The Mythical Dimension and the Spectacular The Custom of the Lads from Şcheii Braşovului: Mythical Reminiscences and Symbolical Valences ........................................ 1 From Mythic-ritualistic Gesture to Popular Show Căluşarii ................ 12 The Sânziene—Between Tradition and Actuality ................................ 21 Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 25 The Woman in Historical Romania The Imaginary of the Female Body
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    Culture Tourism Archaeological Tourism Self-discovery Tourism Accessible Tourism [email protected] Our intent is to offer tours tailored to our customer’s needs, promoting quality tourism and not quantity. The personalized itineraries allow our clients to appreciate a large array of traditional touristic objectives, such as nature, architectural sites, historical monuments and urban areas. For our clients who prefer to relax far from the tumultuous vibration of the cities we offer wine and food tasting tours that give you the opportunity to experience the exquisite Romanian cuisine. All our tours are accompanied by our expert English-speaking guides. Please visit our website to request a quote according to your needs www.romaniaforall.eu Brief description of our programs Details available on our website www.romaniaforall.eu Tour of Romania (from 8 to 21 days) Transylvania: t he Saxo n fortified churches of Biertan, Pr ejm er , Carta, Axente Sever, the citadel of Sighisoara, the medieval castles of Bran / Dracula and Hunyadi , th e fortresses of Rasnov, Rupea and Deva, th e Praid and Turda salt mines . Maramures: t he Barsana, Desesti, Surdesti, Rozavlea, Bogdan Voda , I e ud, Poienile Izei wooden churches, t he cheerful cemetery of Sapanta . B ucov i na: the painted monasteries of Sucevita, Moldovita, Humor a n d Vo r o n et, UNESCO World Heritage Sites, th e P ainted Eggs, the black ceramic of Marginea, the Cacica salt mine . Moldov a: t he O r tho dox monasteries of Neamt, Agapia, V ar at ec and Rasca, the Ruginoasa and Miclauseni Castles, the Neamt fortress .
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Studies 16 240.Indd
    MINORITY STUDIES MINORITY STUDIES Special issue Trends and Directions of Kin-State Policies in Europe and Across the Globe 16 2014 This review is published with the contribution of the Research Institute for Hungarian Communities Abroad and with funding by the National Cultural Fund In cooperation with: Bethlen Gabor Fund Management Editors: Gyõzõ Cholnoky, Zoltán Kántor, András Ludányi, Eszter Herner-Kovács ISSN 2064-227X Published by Lucidus Kiadó Editorial office: H-1014 Budapest, Hess A.tér 5. [email protected] www.bgazrt.hu/npki Typography by Scriptor Kft. Printed by Scriptor Kft. CONTENTS ESZTER HERNER-KOVÁCS – ZoLTÁN KÁNTOR Kin-state Policies in Europe 7 I. THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF DUAL CITIZENSHIP AND EXTERNAL VOTING RIGHTS LÁSZLÓ TRÓCSÁNYI The Regulation of External Voting at National and International Level 13 MARCEL SZABÓ International Law and European Law Aspects of External Voting with Special Regard to Dual Citizenship 25 HAJNALKA JUHÁSZ External Voting in the International Practice: A Comparative Analysis and Overview 47 II. CITIZENSHIP IN WESTERN EUROPE KARL CORDELL Germany as a Kin-state: Norms and Objectives 63 JOËLLE GARRIAUD-MAYLAM The Political Rights of French Citizens Abroad and their Parliamentary Representation 94 FERDINAND MAYRHOFER-GRÜNBÜHEL The Nation-concept and Policies on Citizenship in Austria 107 III. CITIZENSHIP IN EAST CENTRAL EUROPE IRINA CULIC From Restitution to Privileged Re-naturalisation: The Expansive Politics of Dual Citizenship in Romania after 1989 125 Felicita MEDVED ‘Unified
    [Show full text]