DOCSLIB.ORG

1890. Congressional-Record

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1890. Congressional-Record 1890. CONGRESSIONAL -RECORD-SENA-TE. 553 for legislation to prevent the improper detention of people accused of ruling yesterday, and Rule XI did not at the moment occur to him. being insane-to the Committee on the Judiciary. - The Chair is of the opinion that the point made by the Senator from By Mr. RUSK: Petition of Juli!l Nolan, for widow's pension-to the Missouri is well taken. Committee on Invalid Pensions. · Mr. HOAR. Mr. President, I should be glad to make a suggestion By Mr. SMITH, of Illinois: Resoktions of the Board of Trade of to the Chair and to the Senate upon the subject, if there be no objection. Cairo, Ill., relative to the improvement of the Mississippi River-to The Senat.or from :Missouri I think will not have forgotten that the the qpmmittee on Rivers and Harbors. petition presented was presented when other business was going on, By :Mr. STONE, of Kentucky: Petition of William F. Crouse & Co. business which was in my charge. There was no earthly reason, if the and 9 others, citizens of Missouri, for passage of an amend!Ilent to the petition were to take any time by debate or by reading it at length, tariff act-to the Committee on Ways and Means. why it should not have been presented either in the morning hour, By ~. WALLACE, of Massachusetts: Papers to·accompany House when there is time expressly assigned to petitions, or after the mat­ bill for the reliefof Warren V. Howard-to the Committee on :Military ter which was before the Senate-was laid aside for the day. It was in Affairs. the interest of preserving that business against interference that I made By Mr. WILLIAMS, of Illinois: Affi4avit in case of Thomas D. Wng­ the objection. So the matter which bas been discussed by the Senator nau-to the Committee on Military Affairs. from l\Iissouri is wholly immaterial to the merits of the occurrence which took place yesterday. But in regard to the general matter of petitions, I conceive also that the Senator from l\Iissouri is in error. '!'here is an express rule that petitions shall be presented with a written abstract of their contents SENATE. indorsed thereon and without debate. The Senator knows very wen WEDNESDAY, December 17, 1890. that these documents are exceedingly numerous, coming in by the thousand, and I do not know but by the hundred thousand sometimes The Senate met at 10 o'clock a. m. in the course of different sessions; and if they were to be read at length Prayer by the Chaplain, Rev. J. G. BUTLER, D. D. as a rule, the result would be that the debates of the Senate would be The Journal of yesterday's proceedings was read and approved. entirely taken up by the papers presented by volunteers, if they were all read at length, instead of the time being occupied by the Senat.ors PETITIONS AND l\!El\IORIALS. who are elected here to repr~ent the opinions of their constituencies. Mr. FARWELL presented a memorial of the city council of Chicago, Therefore under Rule VII the reading of a petition is in the nature Ill., remonstrating against the licensing of the use of the United States of debate; and to this I wish to ask the attention of the Chair. The pier in that city; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce. Senate has provided that a petition shall be presented and appropri· Mr. HOAR. I present a petition of the Wage-Workers' Political ately referred, and ·an abstract of its contents indorsed upon it, with­ Alliance of the District of Columbia, praying for the adoption of cer­ out debate. The reading of the petition would be in the nature of tain rules by the Senate. debate, and it would be only when that debate was going on that The VICE PRESIDENT. The petition will be referred to the Com­ Rule XI would be applicable. mittee on Rules. When the reading of a. paper is called for and objected to it shall be deter­ Mr. VEST. Mr. President-- mined by a vote of the Senate without debate. The VICE PRESIDENT. Does the Senator from Missouri rise to It certainly never could have been the intention of Rule XI that it the question of the reference ot the petition which has just been pre­ Ahould be in order to take a vote upon the question of reading at length sented? every petition that was presented. It would utterly destroy Rule Mr. VEST. I rose in connection with the subject of the petition. VII. Yesterday the Senator from New Hampshire [:M:r. BLAIR] presented It is proper to observe that the necessity of the case has led the other a petition upon this same subject, as I understood-I could not catch IIom~e to establish a. rule, growing out of the large numbers of that the full meaning of what he said-and I asked that the petition be read body, very much more strict even than ours, because these petitions at the time. The Senator from Massachusetts [Mr. HOAR] objected. are not presented to the open House at all, but they nre handed to the I stated then that it was the first time· in my service in this body that Clerk or put into a box known as the petition box and referred with­ I had ever known a Senator to object to the reading of a petition for out being read at length or stated at all to the House by the Clerk. It information. is not necessary to refer to the odious and ancient precedent which the I have never assumed to be a parliamentarian, an expert in the matter, Senator's party ordered, that all petitions on a certain subject should buiJ I thought it extremely strange that the· power was given by the be laid on the table without any debate whatever. I suppose nobody rules of the Senate to any individual Senator to stop the reading of a now would justify that rule anywhere; but, as I understand it, the petition which was sent here under a constitutional right, in order that present practice of the Senate is simply to require the. petition to be the Senate might.be informed of its contents. I have always assumed presented and its contents stated from the minute or abstract of the as a general proposition that the Senate had the right, when a citizen petition on the back, and anything more than that is in the nature of exercised his privilege of petition, to know what its contents were, in debate. order to ascertain whether it was respectful in terms and legitimate in However, at any time when the Senator from Missouri or any other its object. Senator, especially the Senator from Missouri, whom we all respect, I was so much impressed with what I considered the injustice of this should st.ate that he thought it was expedient as a matter of public proceeding (for I care nothing about the personal motive or actions of interest that a petition should be read at length, I, for one, would the Senator from Massachusetts) that I looked in the rules, an unusual never think of objecting if the request came at a time when there was thing with me, and I call attention now of the Presiding Officer to Rule no other business that I thought was more pressing. XI of the Senate. Yesterday it seemed to be assumed by the Chair, Mr. VEST. Mr. President, let me say a word. I have expressly of which I make no complaint, that as a matter of right any Senator stated that I did not care to discuss the motive of the Senator from could stop the reading of a petition. In Rule XI provision is made Massachusett8, as I certainly do protest against any one questioning that' when any paper is presented to the Senate and objection is made my motive yesterday in regard to what I did in reference to this mat- to its reading the Pre.'!iding Officer shall submit the question to the ~~ . Senate. I assume that that covers petitions, because they are papers. I have not stated that all petitions should be read; that is a very dif­ I find no other rule which is exactly pertinent to the question I am ferent proposition from the case presented to the Senate. Herc was a now discussing. petition presented which I thought ought to be read, a.'! it was entirely The practice bas grown up here-I never had occasion to examine it pertinent to the matter under discussion, the election bill, and for the before-whenever objection is made -by any Senator to the reading of additional reason that Rule .VII bad not been complied with in that any paper the Chair says it goes over. Rules XI and VII are all that case, which requires a condensed statement of the objects of the peti­ I can find which will apply to this subject. Rule XI provides that tion to be indorsed upon it in writing. On the other band, there was whenever any objection is made, the question shall be submitted to simply an oral statement, and an imperfect one, made by the Senator the Senate, and Rule VII, which was not complied with in this case, who offered it. as I fin~ on examining it, requires that a condensed statement of the I submit that the proper time to have objected to the petition was objects of every petition shall be indorsed in writing upon the paper when it was afl:Ared, but no objection was made then and I simply asked itself by the Senator who offers it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    T a b l e C o n T e n T s I s s u e 9 s u mm e r 2 0 1 3 o f pg 4 pg 18 pg 26 pg 43 Featured articles Pg 4 abraham lincoln and Freedom of the Press A Reappraisal by Harold Holzer Pg 18 interbranch tangling Separating Our Constitutional Powers by Judith s. Kaye Pg 26 rutgers v. Waddington Alexander Hamilton and the Birth Pangs of Judicial Review by David a. Weinstein Pg 43 People v. sanger and the Birth of Family Planning clinics in america by Maria T. Vullo dePartments Pg 2 From the executive director Pg 58 the david a. Garfinkel essay contest Pg 59 a look Back...and Forward Pg 66 society Officers and trustees Pg 66 society membership Pg 70 Become a member Back inside cover Hon. theodore t. Jones, Jr. In Memoriam Judicial Notice l 1 From the executive director udicial Notice is moving forward! We have a newly expanded board of editors Dearwho volunteer Members their time to solicit and review submissions, work with authors, and develop topics of legal history to explore. The board of editors is composed J of Henry M. Greenberg, Editor-in-Chief, John D. Gordan, III, albert M. rosenblatt, and David a. Weinstein. We are also fortunate to have David l. Goodwin, Assistant Editor, who edits the articles and footnotes with great care and knowledge. our own Michael W. benowitz, my able assistant, coordinates the layout and, most importantly, searches far and wide to find interesting and often little-known images that greatly compliment and enhance the articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional. Record
    . CONGRESSIONAL. RECORD. PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE FORTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS. SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE. SENATE. Maryland-Arthur P. Gorman and James B. Groome. Massachusetts-Henry L. Dawes and George F. Hoar. MoNDAY, October 10, 1881. Michigan-Omar D. Conger and Thomas W. Ferry. In Minnesota-Alonzo J. Edgerton and Samuel J. R. McMillan. pursuance of the proclamation of September 23, 1881, issued by Missi.sBippi-Jamea Z. George and Lucius Q. C. Lamar. President Arthur (James A. Garfield, the late President ofthe United M'us&uri-Francis M. Cockrell and George G. Vest. Sta.tes, having died on the 19th of September, and the powers and Nebraska-Alvin Saunders and Charles H. VanWyck. duties of the office having, in. conformity with the Constitution, de­ Nevada-John P. Jones. volved upon Vice-President Arthur) the Senate convened to-day in New Hampshire-Henry W. Blair and Edward H. Rollins. special session at the Capitol in the city of Washington. New Jersey-John R. McPherson and William J. Sewell. PRAYER. North Carolina-Matt. W. Ransom and Zebulon B. Vance. Rev. J. J. BULLOCK, D. D., Chaplain to the Senate, offered the fol­ Ohio-George H. Pendleton and John Sherman. lowing prayer : Oregon-La Fayette Grover and James H. Slater. Almighty God, our heavenly Father, in obedience to the call of the Pennsylvania-James Donald Cameron and John I. Mitchell. President of the United States, we have met together this day. We Rhode Island-Henry B. Anthony. meet under circumstances of the greatest solemnity, for since our last S&uth Carolina-M.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Brief of Intervenors-Appellants Elizabeth Trojan, David Delk, and Ron Buel
    FILED July 12, 2019 04:42 AM Appellate Court Records IN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of Validation Proceeding To Determine the Regularity and Legality of Multnomah County Home Rule Charter Section 11.60 and Implementing Ordinance No. 1243 Regulating Campaign Finance and Disclosure. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Petitioner-Appellant, and ELIZABETH TROJAN, MOSES ROSS, JUAN CARLOS ORDONEZ, DAVID DELK, JAMES OFSINK, RON BUEL, SETH ALAN WOOLLEY, and JIM ROBISON, Intervenors-Appellants, and JASON KAFOURY, Intervenor, v. ALAN MEHRWEIN, PORTLAND BUSINESS ALLIANCE, PORTLAND METROPOLITAN ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, and ASSOCIATED OREGON INDUSTRIES, Intervenors-Respondents Multnomah County Circuit Court No. 17CV18006 Court of Appeals No. A168205 Supreme Court No. S066445 OPENING BRIEF OF INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS ELIZABETH TROJAN, DAVID DELK, AND RON BUEL On Certi¡ ed Appeal from a Judgment of the Multnomah County Circuit Court, the Honorable Eric J. Bloch, Judge. caption continued on next page July 2019 LINDA K. WILLIAMS JENNY MADKOUR OSB No. 78425 OSB No. 982980 10266 S.W. Lancaster Road KATHERINE THOMAS Portland, OR 97219 OSB No. 124766 503-293-0399 voice Multnomah County Attorney s Office 855-280-0488 fax 501 SE Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 500 [email protected] Portland, OR 97214 503-988-3138 voice Attorney for Intervenors-Appellants [email protected] Elizabeth Trojan, David Delk, and [email protected] Ron Buel Attorneys for Petitioner-Appellant Multnomah County DANIEL W. MEEK OSB No. 79124 10949 S.W. 4th Avenue GREGORY A. CHAIMOV Portland, OR 97219 OSB No. 822180 503-293-9021 voice Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 855-280-0488 fax 1300 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400 [email protected] Portland, OR 97201 503-778-5328 voice Attorney for Intervenors-Appellants [email protected] Moses Ross, Juan Carlos Ordonez, James Ofsink, Seth Alan Woolley, Attorney for Intervenors-Resondents and Jim Robison i TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the History of Matthew P. Deady and Frederick S. Dunn
    Report on the History of Matthew P. Deady and Frederick S. Dunn By David Alan Johnson Professor, Portland State University former Managing Editor (1997-2014), Pacific Historical Review Quintard Taylor Emeritus Professor and Scott and Dorothy Bullitt Professor of American History. University of Washington Marsha Weisiger Julie and Rocky Dixon Chair of U.S. Western History, University of Oregon In the 2015-16 academic year, students and faculty called for renaming Deady Hall and Dunn Hall, due to the association of Matthew P. Deady and Frederick S. Dunn with the infamous history of race relations in Oregon in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. President Michael Schill initially appointed a committee of administrators, faculty, and students to develop criteria for evaluating whether either of the names should be stripped from campus buildings. Once the criteria were established, President Schill assembled a panel of three historians to research the history of Deady and Dunn to guide his decision-making. The committee consists of David Alan Johnson, the foremost authority on the history of the Oregon Constitutional Convention and author of Founding the Far West: California, Oregon, Nevada, 1840-1890 (1992); Quintard Taylor, the leading historian of African Americans in the U.S. West and author of several books, including In Search of the Racial Frontier: African Americans in the American West, 1528-1990 (1998); and Marsha Weisiger, author of several books, including Dreaming of Sheep in Navajo Country (2009). Other historians have written about Matthew Deady and Frederick Dunn; although we were familiar with them, we began our work looking at the primary sources—that is, the historical record produced by Deady, Dunn, and their contemporaries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legislative History of the Oregon Constitution of 1857—Part Iii (Mostly Miscellaneous: Articles Viii-Xviii)
    ARTICLES WILLAMETTE LAW REVIEW Volume 40:2 Spring 2004 A LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF THE OREGON CONSTITUTION OF 1857—PART III (MOSTLY MISCELLANEOUS: ARTICLES VIII-XVIII) ∗ CLAUDIA BURTON INTRODUCTION 1. State Constitutions in the Mid-Nineteenth Century Many states formed constitutions in the mid-nineteenth century.1 * Professor of Law Emerita, Willamette University College of Law; A.B. Oberlin Col- lege, 1961; M.A.T. Johns Hopkins University, 1962; J.D. University of California at Los An- geles School of Law, 1968. Part I of this work was authored by Claudia Burton and Andrew Grade and was published as A Legislative History of the Oregon Constitution of 1857—Part I (Articles I and II), 37 WILLAMETTE L. REV. 469 (2001). Part II was authored by Claudia Burton alone and was pub- lished as A Legislative History of the Oregon Constitution of 1857—Part II (Frame of Gov- ernment: Articles III-VII), 39 WILLAMETTE L. REV. 245 (2003). Many people have assisted in this large project. Mary Kim Wood was there at the beginning, as she and I deciphered the faded nineteenth-century script of the original Convention docu- ments. Andrew Grade did much of the initial hard slogging through Oregon Constitution and Proceedings, infra note 14, as he and I attempted to draw all the material relating to a particu- lar section of a particular article into one place. The law school’s two faculty secretaries— Kathy Marbut and Candace Bolen—performed a number of quite tedious transcription chores cheerfully and expertly. Michael Hallinan, Nicole Hancock, Clayton Hill, Marc Gardner, and—especially—Marisol Ricoy contributed valuable research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Battles Over Conscription in the Civil War North
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Courtroom Wars: Constitutional Battles over Conscription in the Civil War North Nicholas Matthew Mosvick University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Mosvick, Nicholas Matthew, "Courtroom Wars: Constitutional Battles over Conscription in the Civil War North" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1572. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1572 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COURTROOM WARS: CONSTITUTIONAL BATTLES OVER CONSCRIPTION IN THE CIVIL WAR NORTH A dissertation submitted to the University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Nicholas Matthew Mosvick May 2019 Copyright © 2019 by Nicholas Mosvick All rights reserved. ABSTRACT In February 1863, Congress considered a bill to create for the first-time conscription at the national level. Democratic politicians vigorously protested that the proposed act was unconstitutional and destroyed the state militias. When Congress passed the Enrollment Act, commonly known as the “Conscription Act,” on March 3, 1863, outcry from Democrats about the unconstitutionality of national conscription immediately followed. In New York and Pennsylvania, Democratic newspaper editors and politicians decreed the act the worst among the Lincoln war measures in threatening to subvert the constitutional republic and to transform the United States into a despotism under the control of an autocratic President.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering 1857
    RALPH JAMES MOONEY* Remembering 1857 “We the people of the State of Oregon to the end that Justice be established, order maintained, and liberty perpetuated, do ordain this Constitution.”1 hat a time it must have been! Statehood! To become fully Wparticipating citizens of the young and growing nation. To select their own government officials, replacing unpopular presidential appointees from elsewhere. Perhaps even to become such an official—governor of the new state, supreme court justice, or even U.S. senator. On August 17, 1857, sixty elected delegates—thirty-three farmers, eighteen lawyers, five miners, two newspaper editors, and a civil engineer—met in Salem to draft a constitution for what they hoped would become the thirty-third American state.2 All were recent arrivals—primarily from New England and New York; from Old Northwest states like Ohio, Indiana, and Iowa; or from “border” states 3 like Missouri, Kentucky, and Tennessee. * Kaapcke Professor of Law, University of Oregon. My thanks to Audrey Walther for exemplary research assistance. 1 OR. CONST. pmbl. 2 The breakdown by profession appears in a 1902 address by former delegate John McBride to the Oregon Historical Society. See THE OREGON CONSTITUTION AND PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1857, at 483–84 (Charles Henry Carey ed., 1926) [hereinafter THE OREGON CONSTITUTION AND PROCEEDINGS]. McBride, from Yamhill County, was himself a “lonely voice” at the convention—its only Republican, a “forthright opponent of slavery,” and “uncompromising” on temperance. DAVID ALAN JOHNSON, FOUNDING THE FAR WEST: CALIFORNIA, OREGON, AND NEVADA, 1840–1890, at 162 (1992). 3 See JOHNSON, supra note 2, app.
    [Show full text]
  • I 8 8 9 9 5 As Amended
    As ORDINANCE No. i 8 8 9 9 5 Amended Rename streets west of the Willamette River and east of SW Naito Pkwy, SW View Point Terr and Tryon Creek State Natural Area from Southwest to South, creating a sixth addressing sextant in the City of Portland and Multnomah County; and rename SW Aventine Circus, SW Esquiline Circus, SW Front Ave, SW Northgate Ct and SW South Ridge Dr (Ordinance; amend Ordinance No. 61325; amend Code Chapter 24.75.010) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: 1. The City of Portland was incorporated on February 8, 1851 without a uniform system of naming streets and with a confusing address numbering system, generally consisting of 20 numbers per block. 2. Portland, East Portland and Albina consolidated on July 1, 1891, further exacerbating the problem of redundant street names in different sectors of the newly-consolidated City of Portland. Multiple streets had as many as twelve different block numbering grid locations. On December 24, 1891 visiting City of Chicago Alderman F. Vierling released the recommendations of a Street Committee convened by Mayor William S. Mason for the purposes of improving wayfinding in the City of Portland: a. One name would follow one street clear across the City, rather than have several names in different sections; and b. The oldest of several names would be preserved, the other discarded; and c. There would be baselines dividing the city into quadrants, and houses would be numbered out from the baselines; and d. North-south streets would be called "avenues" and east-west streets would be called "streets", and highways running diagonally would be called "roads", and e.
    [Show full text]
  • A Memorial of Horace Greeley
    - -. ^ LINCOLN ROOM UNIXTRSIT^' OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY MEMORL-\L the Class of 1901 founded by R\RLAN HOYT HORNER and HENRIETTA CALHOUN HORNER ^fMSS^S£^^,^!^m^m wi^mm- '^^"^ 1. i^ 'o^^xaM^ \ //^rfr^'<^^ i^~^^/£^ rjVlimol nywuty itflWallxlHi >« Bmy lift: J.RRri & C* BiMulwri. M Y MEMOEIAL ov HOEACE GEEELET. NEW YORK: PUBLISHED BY THE TRIBUNE ASSOCIATION. 1873. Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 18T3, by THE TRIBUNE ASSOCIATION, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington. Bakkr & Godwin, Printer'*, PrintinR-House Square, New York. INTRODUCTOPiY NOTE. The death of Horace Greeley called forth, a nniversal expression of sympathy and homage, such as has rarely been manifested on the departure of any public man, how- ever exalted in position or noble in character. From every quarter of the country the tribute of a people' s grief has been freely offered, with the heartfelt commemoration of the virtues of the beloved dead. The Press and the Pulpit have vied with each other in celebrating his worth, and honoring his name with affectionate admiration. A large number of the friends of Mr. Greeley have expressed the deske to possess these memorials in a per- manent form, and in compliance with theu' wishes the pres- ent volume has been prepared, under the direction of the Editor of T7ie Tribune. It consists of a selection from the numerous articles in various journals, together with notices from the pulpit that have been suggested by Mr. Gree- ley's death ; an account of the proceedings of several public bodies in relation to that event ; and a description of the funeral ceremonies with which the remains of the departed were borne to the tomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Indians and Criminal Justice in Early Oregon, 1842-1859
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 4-1973 Indians and Criminal Justice in Early Oregon, 1842-1859 John Samuel Ferrell Portland State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Ferrell, John Samuel, "Indians and Criminal Justice in Early Oregon, 1842-1859" (1973). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 1601. 10.15760/etd.1600 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT or tHE THISIS Of JOHN SAMUEL FERRILL '0. tbe M...... of AI'" 'n Hi.tor, , .......,.. April '. 19734. Tlt.le. lad1.4.8 .act 0..""_1 Juatlce in S••l, 01'8,-. 1842 .. 1859 APPROVED BY HEMBI•• or THI fSlsts COMMIT!I!. Iadl.a-whlte rel.,'''. ta ••1'17 0"8,- .... .ft•• vi...d 1ft I.e,... 01 ••1"81'8 ••• 11'••,,..1I1GI. b\lt the:.. •... oalr tbe ..at .byt.....,.ct••f • 1.r&.~ .t~u..l. to ••••1•••ul'.rat ...fliete• ••t.tl. 1_" dl..,.t... aM ••t.ablt." _ct... t" .....e ..rlto ..,. Ad.ltl.._l .1l4.J:'.~.ft.llll of bot.h .ttlt. a1.1.l'"... , ..ard ladla•• • ad of luteD ....p....tlO1l wit.h t.be IRtlel'. .., be .at"e. fl'. • stud7 of haw ertataal Juett.. .,piled to the red aan dUl'iaa t.he turbulent p.........".t.108 ...a. p"s.o.
    [Show full text]
  • To Access the David Duniway Papers Finding Aide
    Container List 1999.013 ~ Records ~ Duniway, David C. 07/19/2017 Container Folder Location Creator Date Title Description Subjects Box 01 1.01 1868-1980 Adolph-Gill Bldgs The materials in this folder relate to the buildings owned and occupied by J.K. Gill & Co. and by Sam Adolph. These two buildings are in the heart of the original business district of Salem. The Gill Building (1868) is west of the Adolph Block (1880), and they share a staircase. The Gill building was later referred to as the Paulus Building, as it was acquired by Christopher Paulus in 1885; both Robert and Fred Paulus were born upstairs in the building. The Adolph Building was erected by Sam Adolph following a fire that destroyed the wooden buildings on the site; the architect was J.S. Coulter. References to articles in the Daily American Unionist from April 23, 1868 through September 8, 1868 describe the four new brick buildings under construction on State and Commercial Streets. Thes buildings are the intended new homes for the businesses of J.K. Gill & Co., Charley Stewart, Durbin & Co., and Governor Wood's new dwelling. Progress is periodically described. Finally, the first ten days of September, 1868, the moves appear complete and advertisements indicate the items they will carry. Another article in the September 8, 1868 issue indicates that Story and Thompson are moving a house lately occupied by J.K. Gill and Co. to the eastern edge of the lot so that when it is time to construct additional brick buildings, there will be space.
    [Show full text]