DOCSLIB.ORG

A C P Assessm Conditi Park, G Ment of Ions in Georgia F Water Kenne a R Resou Esaw M Urces an Ountain Nd Wat N Natio Tershed On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A C P Assessm Conditi Park, G Ment of Ions in Georgia F Water Kenne a R Resou Esaw M Urces an Ountain Nd Wat N Natio Tershed On National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Assessment of Water Resources and Watershed Conditions in Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park, Georgia Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2010/273 ON THE COVER Heavily silted bottom of John Ward Creek, Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park Photograph by: Michael Mallin Assessment of Water Resources and Watershed Conditions in Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park, Georgia Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2010/273 JoAnn M. Burkholder Center for Applied Aquatic Ecology North Carolina State University 620 Hutton Street, Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27606 December 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in the Reports and Publications section of the Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network webpage (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/secn/) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM). Please cite this publication as: Burkholder, J. M.. 2010. Assessment of water resources and watershed conditions in Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park, Georgia. Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR— 2010/273. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 352/106195, December 2010 ii Contents Page Figures........................................................................................................................................... vii Tables ............................................................................................................................................. ix Plates .............................................................................................................................................. xi Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... xiii Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... xv Water Quality ......................................................................................................................... xv Ecosystem and Community Health ....................................................................................... xv Groundwater ......................................................................................................................... xvi Education Outreach .............................................................................................................. xvi Other Actions ........................................................................................................................ xvi Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................... xvii Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... xix Park Description.............................................................................................................................. 1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 Location, Size, and Boundaries .......................................................................................... 1 History of the Park .............................................................................................................. 2 Creation of the Park ............................................................................................................ 2 Land Use / Land Cover ............................................................................................................ 3 Hydrologic Information ........................................................................................................... 6 Surface Waters .................................................................................................................... 6 Wetlands ........................................................................................................................... 12 Groundwater Resources .................................................................................................... 12 Biological Resources ............................................................................................................. 13 iii Microalgae ........................................................................................................................ 13 Wetland and Aquatic Macrophytes ................................................................................... 14 Terrestrial Vegetation ....................................................................................................... 14 Aquatic Macroinvertebrates .............................................................................................. 14 Amphibians and Reptiles .................................................................................................. 20 Fish .................................................................................................................................... 22 Birds .................................................................................................................................. 22 Mammals........................................................................................................................... 23 Rare and Threatened Species ............................................................................................ 26 Exotic / Invasive Species .................................................................................................. 26 Assessment of Park Water Resources .................................................................................... 27 Surface Water Quality ....................................................................................................... 27 Drinking Water ................................................................................................................. 39 Groundwater Quality ........................................................................................................ 39 Sources of Pollutants ............................................................................................................. 39 Point Sources .................................................................................................................... 39 Nonpoint Sources .............................................................................................................. 39 Assessment of Biological Resources With Respect To Water and Air Quality .................... 40 Water Quality Standards ................................................................................................... 40 Impaired Surface Water Quality and Habitat .................................................................... 44 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................ 45 Air Quality Standards ................................................................................................ 45 Air Resources ............................................................................................................. 46 Drinking Water ................................................................................................................. 51 Groundwater ..................................................................................................................... 51 iv Ecosystem Effects ............................................................................................................. 51 Human Health Issues ........................................................................................................ 52 Other Issues of Concern ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Call of the Chickadee
    December, the Doorway to Winter: Call of the Chickadee “Chicka-dee-dee-dee”- this beloved little bird sings its name for the whole world to hear. Black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) are small plump birds, just 4 to 5 inches in length with 8-inch wingspans. Both males and females look alike with soft gray backs and tails, white cheeks, a white chest and belly, and a splash of buff-colored feathers below the wings. Their most distinctive characteristics are their black caps and black masks and throats. The chickadees along with their cousins the Carolina chickadees and tufted titmice are members of a passerine family of birds called Paridae and are often referred to as Parids. They are common sites in the winter landscape as they are non-migratory and stay in their habitats year-round. The range of black-capped chickadees and Carolinas overlap and sometimes the birds interbreed so identification can be confusing. Black-capped chickadees are generally a northern species and are the more common bird here at Duke Farms. Black-capped chickadees live in mixed deciduous and coniferous forests, but readily visit bird feeders in suburban backyards. The black-capped chickadee is found from Alaska east through Canada and throughout the upper two-thirds of the United States. They are year-round residents wherever they live. In winter Chickadees often form small flocks that may include other birds like titmice and nuthatches. They flit from tree branch to tree branch gleaning the dead insects, spider eggs, seeds, mosses and berries from bark and trees. Chickadees often collect and cache their food for future meals, sometimes storing food in holes in snags or under bark or lichen.
    [Show full text]
  • Cavity Nesting Birds Guild
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Cavity Nesting Birds Guild Carolina Chickadee Poecile carolinensis Carolina Wren Thryothorus ludovicianus Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Downy Woodpecker Picoides pubescens Pileated Woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus Purple Martin Progne subis Red-bellied Woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus NOTE: The Red-cockaded Woodpecker is discussed in its own species account. Contributor (2013): Paige Koon (SCDNR) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description Red-bellied Woodpecker, David Brezinski/USFWS The cavity nesting guild includes a diverse group of birds that all require the use of cavities or crevices as nesting locations. The most well-known cavity- nesting species are woodpeckers (family Picidae), and this account addresses 4 species: Downy Woodpecker, Pileated Woodpecker, Red-bellied Woodpecker, and Downy Woodpecker, Dan Red-headed Woodpecker. The remaining birds in the Sudia/USFWS Cavity Nesting Birds Guild included in this account are from the families Paridae (Carolina Chickadee), Troglodytidae (Carolina Wren), Apodidae (Chimney Swift), and Hirundinidae (Purple Martin). The Downy Woodpecker is the smallest of the 4 woodpeckers discussed here. It is distinguished in appearance by its black and white coloration, white breast, white striping on the head, and white on Pileated Woodpecker, Mark the back between the wings. Adult males have a Musselman/USFWS smudge of red across the back of their head. The Pileated Woodpecker, the largest in North America, is a striking bird with a red crest and solid-black back. In flight, the white on the underside of its wings is readily apparent. The Red-bellied Red-headed Woodpecker, Woodpecker is a medium-sized woodpecker that is Dave Menke/USFWS distinguished by its zebra-striped wings and back, and red “mullet”.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Test of Assisted Migration for Conservation of Locally Range-Restricted Plants in Alberta, Canada
    Global Ecology and Conservation 17 (2019) e00572 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Original Research Article Experimental test of assisted migration for conservation of locally range-restricted plants in Alberta, Canada Yuzhuo Wang a, b, 1, Jennine L.M. Pedersen c, 1, S. Ellen Macdonald c, * ** Scott E. Nielsen c, , Jian Zhang a, b, a Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station & Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, PR China b Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai, 200092, PR China c Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada article info abstract Article history: Given projected rates of climate change, species with limited dispersal may be unable to Received 10 October 2018 migrate at the pace necessary to maintain their current climate niches. This could lead to Received in revised form 19 February 2019 increased risk of extirpation or extinction, especially for locally range-restricted species Accepted 19 February 2019 within fragmented landscapes. Assisted migration has been suggested as a proactive conservation tool to mitigate these risks. We tested assisted migration for Liatris ligulistylis Keywords: and Houstonia longifolia, two perennial forbs considered ‘vulnerable’ and ‘imperilled’, Assisted migration respectively, in Alberta, Canada, where they are at their northern and western range limits. Range-restricted species Climate change Both mature plants and seeds were translocated to replicate sites at four geographic lo- Range shift cations along a north-south gradient representing the current ranges of the species Vulnerability (central) and areas south (warmer) and north (cooler) of their current range.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Mixed Foraging Flocks of Avian Species. Douglass Hathaway Morse Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1965 Biology of Mixed Foraging Flocks of Avian Species. Douglass Hathaway Morse Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Morse, Douglass Hathaway, "Biology of Mixed Foraging Flocks of Avian Species." (1965). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1048. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1048 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 65—11,400 microfilmed exactly as received MORSE, Douglass Hathaway, 1938- BIOLOGY OF MIXED FORAGING FLOCKS OF AVIAN SPECIES. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1965 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan BIOLOGY OF MIXED FORAGING FLOCKS OF AVIAN SPECIES A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Zoology by Douglass Hathaway Morse B •S•9 Bates College, 1960 M.S., The University of Michigan, 1962 May, 1965 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 thank the Department of Zoology and the Museum of Zoology at Louisiana State University for support and the use of equipment during the course of this study* The International Center for Medical Research and Training extended many courtesies to me during my stay in Costa Rica* Mr* Rex R.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Park Report, Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park, Georgia
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior State of the Park Report Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park Georgia November 2013 National Park Service. 2013. State of the Park Report for Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park. State of the Park Series No. 8. National Park Service, Washington, D.C. On the cover: Civil War cannon and field of flags at Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park. Disclaimer. This State of the Park report summarizes the current condition of park resources, visitor experience, and park infrastructure as assessed by a combination of available factual information and the expert opinion and professional judgment of park staff and subject matter experts. The internet version of this report provides the associated workshop summary report and additional details and sources of information about the findings summarized in the report, including references, accounts on the origin and quality of the data, and the methods and analytic approaches used in data collection and assessments of condition. This report provides evaluations of status and trends based on interpretation by NPS scientists and managers of both quantitative and non- quantitative assessments and observations. Future condition ratings may differ from findings in this report as new data and knowledge become available. The park superintendent approved the publication of this report. Executive Summary The mission of the National Park Service is to preserve unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of national parks for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. NPS Management Policies (2006) state that “The Service will also strive to ensure that park resources and values are passed on to future generations in a condition that is as good as, or better than, the conditions that exist today.” As part of the stewardship of national parks for the American people, the NPS has begun to develop State of the Park reports to assess the overall status and trends of each park’s resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Photos from the 48Th Annual Pilgrimage ISSUE
    Volume 92 Number 3 May 2017 Georgia Botanical Society IN THIS Photos from the 48th Annual Pilgrimage ISSUE: Trip Reports - P3, P5 Upcoming Field Trips - P7-11 From Shakerag Hollow (#2): Dutchman’s britches (Dicentra cucullaria) on left, and, on right: Trillium grandiflorum with large-flowered bellwort (Uvularia grandiflora;) photos by Charles Seabrook. Above: the group at Big Soddy Creek Gulf #16 (Photo: Mitchell Kent); Below: the group at Shirley Miller Wildflower Trail #17 (Photo: Jim Drake) Above: Shooting star (Dodecatheon meadia) on trip #23 (Photo:E. Honeycutt) 2 BotSoc News, May 2017 President’s Perspective We have just had another fantastic pilgrimage at our first out-of-state location—Chattanooga. Our program was enriched with sites, field trip leaders, and participants from Tennessee. The weather was gorgeous and the wildflowers on time. Facilities for the social and banquet were excellent—I loved the towing museum and train station venues. This year we had three students receiving scholarships to attend the pilgrimage: Ashley DeSensi from Columbus State, Bridget Piatt from Gordon State, and Loy Xingwen from Emory. If you see any of these students on future field trips, be sure to welcome them. They were joined by Brandi Griffin from Valdosta State University, who was a scholarship recipient in 2015 and who has attended every pilgrimage and several field trips since. It is encouraging to see students continuing to participate. These scholarships are a great way to recruit young professionals BotSoc News into BotSoc. If you know students taking botany-type courses, please encourage is published seven times a year them to apply for scholarships to attend the pilgrimage.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Plant Species List
    Plant Species Page 1 of 19 Home ER Feedback What's New More on PNHP slpecies Lit't~s• " All Species Types " Plants " Vertebrates " Invertebrates Plant Species List " Geologic Features Species " Natural By Community Types Coun ty.FiN Watershed I * Rank and ý7hOW all Species: Status Definitions Records Can Be Sorted By Clicking Column Name * Species Fact Export list to Text Sheets Proposed Global State State Federal Scientific Name Common Name State Rank Rank Status Status * County Natural Status Three-seeded Heritage Acalypha dearnii G4? Sx N PX Mercury Inventories Aconitum reclinatum White Monkshood G3 S1 PE PE (PDF) Aconitum uncinaturn Blue Monkshood G4 S2 PT PT Acorus americanus Sweet Flag G5 S1 PE PE Aleutian Adiantum aleuticum G5? SNR TU TU * Plant Maidenhair Fern Community Aeschynomene Sensitive Joint- G2 Sx PX PX LT Information virginica vetch (PDF)' Eared False- Agalinis auriculata G3 $1 PE PE foxglove Blue-ridge False- Agalinis decemloba G4Q Sx PX PX foxglove o PNDI Project Small-flowered Agalinis paupercula G5 S1 PE PE Planning False-foxglove Environmental Agrostis altissima Tall Bentgrass G4 Sx PX PX Review Aletris farinosa Colic-root G5 S1 TU PE Northern Water- Alisma triviale G5 S1 PE PE NOTE:Clicking plantain this link opens a Alnus viridis Mountain Alder G5 S1 PE PE new browser Alopecurus aequalis Short-awn Foxtail G5 S3 N TU PS window Amaranthus Waterhemp G5 S3 PR PR cannabinus Ragweed Amelanchier Oblong-fruited G5 $1 PE PE bartramiana Serviceberry Amelanchier Serviceberry G5 SNR N UEF canadensis http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/PlantsPage.aspx
    [Show full text]
  • Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts
    Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts September 15, 2013 This report is the result of several years of field data collection, analyses and IBI development, and consideration of the opportunities for wetland program and policy development in relation to IBIs and CAPS Index of Ecological Integrity (IEI). Contributors include: University of Massachusetts Amherst Kevin McGarigal, Ethan Plunkett, Joanna Grand, Brad Compton, Theresa Portante, Kasey Rolih, and Scott Jackson Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Jan Smith, Marc Carullo, and Adrienne Pappal Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Lisa Rhodes, Lealdon Langley, and Michael Stroman Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop a fully empirically-based method for developing Indices of Biotic Integrity (IBIs) that does not rely on expert opinion or the arbitrary designation of reference sites and pilot its application in forested wetlands, coastal salt marshes and wadable freshwater streams in Massachusetts. The method we developed involves: 1) using a suite of regression models to estimate the abundance of each taxon across a gradient of stressor levels, 2) using statistical calibration based on the fitted regression models and maximum likelihood methods to predict the value of the stressor metric based on the abundance of the taxon at each site, 3) selecting taxa in a forward stepwise procedure that conditionally improves the concordance between the observed stressor value and the predicted value the most and a stopping rule for selecting taxa based on a conditional alpha derived from comparison to pseudotaxa data, and 4) comparing the coefficient of concordance for the final IBI to the expected distribution derived from randomly permuted data.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Notes on the Life History of the Carolina Chickadee1
    COMPARATIVE NOTES ON THE LIFE HISTORY OF THE CAROLINA CHICKADEE1 RICHARD BREWER knowledge of the life histories of closely related organisms is basic to A understanding their ecological and evolutionary relationships. The Carolina and Black-capped Chickadees (Parus carolinensis Audubon and P. atricapillus Linnaeus) are sibling species occupying essentially allopatric breeding ranges. Where their ranges are contiguous in western Illinois and eastern Missouri, interbreeding apparently occurs, with the production of a zone in which a large proportion of the birds may be hybrids. This paper presents information on certain aspects of the life history of the Carolina Chickadee, along with comparative material on the Black-capped Chickadee and on a population occurring at the line of contact between these two species. Appreciation is due S. C. Kendeigh, who directed the study. Many persons have aided me through discussion or by assistance in field work; particularly, I am indebted to G. W. COX, W. L. Gillespie, and G. C. West. For supplying me with much valuable information through correspondence, I extend my thanks to K. L. Dixon, L. D. K. Lawrence, C. McMullen, J. T. Tanner, and especially to H. Brackbill and A. Laskey whose sizable contributions are cited specifically in the appropriate sections beyond. My wife, Lucy Sharp Brewer, assisted in tending and observing young in the laboratory. Work during the years 1956-1959 was supported by National Science Foundation pre- doctoral fellowships. PROCEDURE Field work was conducted from October 1954 to November 1959. Although some supplemental observations were made in Indiana, Michigan, Mis- souri, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas, the principal areas of investiga- tion were the following counties of Illinois: Bond, Champaign, Clinton, Coles, Cumberland, Douglas, Effingham, Fayette, Jackson, Piatt, Randolph, Shelby, Washington, and Williamson.
    [Show full text]
  • Makrozoobentos Kao Pokazatelj Ekološkog Potencijala Umjetnih Stajaćica
    Makrozoobentos kao pokazatelj ekološkog potencijala umjetnih stajaćica Vučković, Natalija Doctoral thesis / Disertacija 2021 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:217:251464 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-11 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of Faculty of Science - University of Zagreb PRIRODOSLOVNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET BIOLOŠKI ODSJEK Natalija Vučković MAKROZOOBENTOS KAO POKAZATELJ EKOLOŠKOG POTENCIJALA UMJETNIH STAJAĆICA DOKTORSKI RAD Zagreb, 2020 PRIRODOSLOVNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET BIOLOŠKI ODSJEK Natalija Vučković MAKROZOOBENTOS KAO POKAZATELJ EKOLOŠKOG POTENCIJALA UMJETNIH STAJAĆICA DOKTORSKI RAD Mentor: Prof. dr. sc. Zlatko Mihaljević Zagreb, 2020 FACULTY OF SCIENCE DIVISION OF BIOLOGY Natalija Vučković MACROZOOBENTHOS AS AN INDICATOR OF THE ECOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF CONSTRUCTED LAKE DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Supervisor: Prof. dr. sc. Zlatko Mihaljević Zagreb, 2020 Ovaj je doktorski rad izrađen na Zoologijskom zavodu Prirodoslovno- matematičkog fakulteta, pod vodstvom Prof. dr. sc. Zlatka Mihaljevića, u sklopu Sveučilišnog poslijediplomskog doktorskog studija Biologije pri Biološkom odsjeku Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. MENTOR DOKTORSKE DISERTACIJE Prof. dr. sc. Zlatko Mihaljević Rođen je 21. siječnja 1966. godine u Varaždinu. Studij biologije (ekologija), upisuje 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Backyard Birds in Texas
    Backyard Birds in Texas by Mark klyM In Memory of Rob Fleming ROB FLEMING OCTOBER 27, 1941 MARCH 30, 2003 rob Fleming passed away on March 30, 2003 after a lengthy battle with cancer. rob earned his art degree from Southwest Texas State University and was a successful commercial artist in Houston before opening his own design studio in 1982. rob joined TPWD in 1990 as a staff illustrator and was the Fine art Manager in the Creative Services branch of the Communications Division. rob provided many illustrations for TPWD programs throughout his career and was the winner of numerous awards for his work. leaving the paints to the painters, rob wove his own brand of magic with Prismacolor pencils. Whether a still-life study or a Texas landscape, rob’s technique of color layering created distinctive and truly unique pencil paintings. His colorful pencil studies are in various corporate and private collections throughout the state, and his art graces many TPWD posters, brochures, books and reports. His gentle style and wonderful talent will truly be missed. Cover illustration of Downy Woodpecker by Rob Fleming. Introduction birdwatching, or birding as it is more often referred to, is one of the fastest growing hobbies today. reasons for this popularity are as diverse as birders—aesthetics of the birds, the chance to get out in nature or a simple love for birds. These are some of the common answers to the question “Why do you like birds?” Creating a habitat that is welcoming to the birds that visit your backyard can help you enjoy the hobby of birding without even leaving the comfort of your living room.
    [Show full text]