Grassy Bald (Grass Subtype)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grassy Bald (Grass Subtype) GRASSY BALD (GRASS SUBTYPE) Concept: Grassy Bald (Grass Subtype) is a natural high elevation meadow with a dense herb layer dominated by grasses, though patches of forbs and sedges are present and some examples now have extensive patches of shrubs or Rubus. Grassy Balds have well-developed soils that contrast with those of rock outcrop communities and glades. Danthonia compressa is typically the dominant grass, but pasture grasses such as Phleum pratense may become abundant in the more heavily grazed examples. Distinguishing Features: Grassy Balds are distinguished from other natural communities by the natural dominance of dense herbaceous vegetation in high elevation upland sites that are not rock outcrops or glades. Small rock outcrops and shallow soil patches may be embedded but do not make up most of the area. High Elevation Rocky Summit communities, in contrast, contain substantial bare rock, though they may contain small patches of herbaceous vegetation with some of the same species. High Elevation Mafic Glades and Low Elevation Acidic or Basic Glades contain more grass but are clearly related to shallow soil. True Grassy Balds can be difficult to distinguish from old high elevation pastures and burn scars. Some extensive grassy areas, e.g. Graveyard Fields and areas near Mount Mitchell, are known to have originated from logging and burning of spruce-fir forest in the 1900s and should not be regarded as Grassy Balds. The classification should be used only if there is reason to believe an area has been grassy from prehistoric times. Artificial grasslands may be dominated by Danthonia compressa but are less likely to contain rare plants and more often contain substantial weedy flora. However, heavily grazed natural Grassy Balds also may contain weedy flora, and many have been invaded by Rubus or various shrubs and are no longer herb dominated. Some examples may remain ambiguous. The Grass Subtype is distinguished from the Sedge Subtype by dominance of grasses, usually Danthonia compressa, rather than Carex spp. It is distinguished from the Alder Subtype by the absence of substantial cover of Alnus crispa. Synonyms: Danthonia compressa - (Sibbaldiopsis tridentata) Herbaceous Vegetation (CEGL004242). Ecological Systems: Southern Appalachian Grass and Shrub Bald (CES202.294). Sites: Grassy Balds occur on gentle to moderate slopes, ridgetops, and broad domes at high elevation. Examples range from around 5000 feet to over 6000 feet in elevation. Soils: Grassy Balds occur on relatively deep soils, where tree presence apparently is not precluded by soil depth. Most are mapped as the Burton series (Typic Haplumbrept). Cain (1931) found that Grassy Bald soils in the Smokies were less acidic than other soils at similar elevations, although it is unclear that this causes the distinctive vegetation rather than results from it. Hydrology: Grassy Balds generally occur on high convex slopes and are well drained, though seeps may be embedded in them. They are mesic due to high rainfall, frequent fog, and low temperatures, but are exposed to drying winds. Vegetation: Grassy Balds are characteristically dominated by dense herbaceous vegetation, with Danthonia compressa the dominant species. Patches may be dominated by Sibbaldia retusa (Sibbaldiopsis tridentata), Packera schweinitziana, or Rumex acetosella. Other frequent herbs in CVS plot data include Carex pensylvanica, Pilosella (Deschampsia) caespitosa, Potentilla simplex, Poa compressa, Achillea borealis, Carex brunnescens var. sphaerostachya, and Athyrium asplenioides. Phleum pratense, Poa compressa, and Poa pratensis are also fairly frequent, presumably because of a history of grazing. Other species less frequent in plots but often prominent in observations include Houstonia serpyllifolia, Fragaria virginiana, Lilium grayi, Athyrium angustum, Athyrium asplenioides, Gentiana austromontana, and the moss Polytrichum commune. Balds may be purely herbaceous or may have shrubs and trees of varying density. Rubus canadensis or Rubus alleghaniensis have invaded many balds that were grazed and then removed from grazing and may be dominant over large patches where not kept in check by deliberate management. Vaccinium altomontanum, Rhododendron calendulaceum, Rhododendron catawbiense, Vaccinium simulatum, Kalmia latifolia, Menziesia pilosa, Abies fraseri, Picea rubens, Fagus grandifolia, and Quercus rubra may be present in sparse-to-moderate density. These species too are considered invaders and may eventually shade out the herb layer. Range and Abundance: Ranked G1. Only a few examples are known, scattered throughout the higher mountains from the Great Smoky Mountains northward. The overall abundance and range is confused by the presence of ambiguously natural grassy areas in several places and the widespread use of the term bald for artificial grasslands. This community is nearly endemic to North Carolina, but a few examples occur in adjacent Tennessee and Virginia. Associations and Patterns: The Grass Subtype may be associated with the Sedge Subtype and on Roan Mountain, the Alder Subtype. Grassy Balds are sometimes associated with Heath Balds, High Elevation Red Oak Forest, or Northern Hardwood Forest. High Elevation Rocky Summit or High Elevation Boggy Seep patches may be embedded. Transitions to adjacent forests sometimes seem gradual, sometimes abrupt. Because of recent management and unknown past management, it is impossible to know the nature of natural ecotones. Even examples of natural origin were grazed and may have been expanded by clearing at their edges. Encroachment of shrubs and trees into Grassy Bald often appears to progress from the edges. Variation: Balds vary widely in dominant plants from site to site and within sites. Sites vary with grazing history, exposure, and unknown factors. Dynamics: The factors that produced and maintained Grassy Balds have been the subject of intense scientific interest over the years, and much has been written about them, but consensus has not been reached (see Smathers 1980, summary by Peterson 1980, and views expressed in Billings and Mark 1957, Bratton and White 1980, Brown 1941, Cain 1931, Gersmehl 1973, Lindsay and Bratton 1976a, 1976b, Lindsay and Bratton 1980, Mark 1958, Smathers 1980, Stratton and White 1982, and Wells 1937, 1956). Hypotheses of origin include human action such as clearing and grazing of cattle by early settlers; clearing and burning by Native Americans; presettlement grazing and trampling by native large mammals; natural disturbances such as fire, windthrow, or insects; and changing climatic conditions. New Grassy Balds are not being created from forests at present, and existing examples do not seem to be maintaining themselves. Johnson (1995) documented the loss of grassy area in the Craggy Mountains, and a management team has tracked the changes in Grassy Balds at Roan Mountain for decades. The question of the origin of Grassy Balds is given urgency by their ecological instability at present. All examples appear to be experiencing invasion by shrubs or trees, though trees are much slower to establish and spread than in disturbed forests. Balds that are not actively being managed to remove woody vegetation are losing their open grassy character. The question of recent human creation is confused by the existence of grassy areas that clearly are recently created, either by logging and burning of spruce-fir forests or by clearing and grazing by early settlers. Some of these areas have place names of “bald” and are treated as grassy balds by some authors. However, there is evidence that other grassy areas were present when settlers arrived, and these are the focus of the Grassy Bald community defined here. Though Grassy Balds are not floristically similar to northern alpine tundra (Stratton and White 1982), and many of their species are present in other open natural communities, they likely developed from Pleistocene alpine tundra that is generally believed to have existed in the Southern Appalachians. The balds contain some shade-intolerant species, such as Packera schweinitziana and Sibbaldiopsis tridentata, which are not in surrounding forests. Such species are not observed spreading into new sites, and their presence suggests great antiquity for balds such as those on Roan Mountain. The potential for creation by Native Americans is more difficult to rule out, given their longer tenancy and the range of possible human behavior. However, the sites of Grassy Balds are not suited for agriculture or long-term settlement and were not particularly close to Native American settlements. Prehistoric people hunted throughout the region and ignited fires throughout the region, but there is no reason to expect them to have focused such activities on particular ridge tops sufficiently to replace forest with grassland. With the exception of spruce-fir forests, even severely burned forest areas quickly begin returning to tree cover. Only frequent burning, more frequent than either the natural or anthropogenic background rate, or ongoing cattle grazing, will prevent tree establishment. More plausibly, the previous existence of grassy meadows led to a focus on such places for cattle grazing and, probably in earlier times, for hunting. Weigl and Knowles (2013) discuss several such lines of evidence against human creation of Grassy Balds. Known natural disturbances do not seem sufficient to explain the origin or persistence of Grassy Balds. Where forests have been disturbed by wind storms, ice storms, or natural fire at high elevations,
Recommended publications
  • Experimental Test of Assisted Migration for Conservation of Locally Range-Restricted Plants in Alberta, Canada
    Global Ecology and Conservation 17 (2019) e00572 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Original Research Article Experimental test of assisted migration for conservation of locally range-restricted plants in Alberta, Canada Yuzhuo Wang a, b, 1, Jennine L.M. Pedersen c, 1, S. Ellen Macdonald c, * ** Scott E. Nielsen c, , Jian Zhang a, b, a Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station & Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, PR China b Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai, 200092, PR China c Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada article info abstract Article history: Given projected rates of climate change, species with limited dispersal may be unable to Received 10 October 2018 migrate at the pace necessary to maintain their current climate niches. This could lead to Received in revised form 19 February 2019 increased risk of extirpation or extinction, especially for locally range-restricted species Accepted 19 February 2019 within fragmented landscapes. Assisted migration has been suggested as a proactive conservation tool to mitigate these risks. We tested assisted migration for Liatris ligulistylis Keywords: and Houstonia longifolia, two perennial forbs considered ‘vulnerable’ and ‘imperilled’, Assisted migration respectively, in Alberta, Canada, where they are at their northern and western range limits. Range-restricted species Climate change Both mature plants and seeds were translocated to replicate sites at four geographic lo- Range shift cations along a north-south gradient representing the current ranges of the species Vulnerability (central) and areas south (warmer) and north (cooler) of their current range.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Photos from the 48Th Annual Pilgrimage ISSUE
    Volume 92 Number 3 May 2017 Georgia Botanical Society IN THIS Photos from the 48th Annual Pilgrimage ISSUE: Trip Reports - P3, P5 Upcoming Field Trips - P7-11 From Shakerag Hollow (#2): Dutchman’s britches (Dicentra cucullaria) on left, and, on right: Trillium grandiflorum with large-flowered bellwort (Uvularia grandiflora;) photos by Charles Seabrook. Above: the group at Big Soddy Creek Gulf #16 (Photo: Mitchell Kent); Below: the group at Shirley Miller Wildflower Trail #17 (Photo: Jim Drake) Above: Shooting star (Dodecatheon meadia) on trip #23 (Photo:E. Honeycutt) 2 BotSoc News, May 2017 President’s Perspective We have just had another fantastic pilgrimage at our first out-of-state location—Chattanooga. Our program was enriched with sites, field trip leaders, and participants from Tennessee. The weather was gorgeous and the wildflowers on time. Facilities for the social and banquet were excellent—I loved the towing museum and train station venues. This year we had three students receiving scholarships to attend the pilgrimage: Ashley DeSensi from Columbus State, Bridget Piatt from Gordon State, and Loy Xingwen from Emory. If you see any of these students on future field trips, be sure to welcome them. They were joined by Brandi Griffin from Valdosta State University, who was a scholarship recipient in 2015 and who has attended every pilgrimage and several field trips since. It is encouraging to see students continuing to participate. These scholarships are a great way to recruit young professionals BotSoc News into BotSoc. If you know students taking botany-type courses, please encourage is published seven times a year them to apply for scholarships to attend the pilgrimage.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Plant Species List
    Plant Species Page 1 of 19 Home ER Feedback What's New More on PNHP slpecies Lit't~s• " All Species Types " Plants " Vertebrates " Invertebrates Plant Species List " Geologic Features Species " Natural By Community Types Coun ty.FiN Watershed I * Rank and ý7hOW all Species: Status Definitions Records Can Be Sorted By Clicking Column Name * Species Fact Export list to Text Sheets Proposed Global State State Federal Scientific Name Common Name State Rank Rank Status Status * County Natural Status Three-seeded Heritage Acalypha dearnii G4? Sx N PX Mercury Inventories Aconitum reclinatum White Monkshood G3 S1 PE PE (PDF) Aconitum uncinaturn Blue Monkshood G4 S2 PT PT Acorus americanus Sweet Flag G5 S1 PE PE Aleutian Adiantum aleuticum G5? SNR TU TU * Plant Maidenhair Fern Community Aeschynomene Sensitive Joint- G2 Sx PX PX LT Information virginica vetch (PDF)' Eared False- Agalinis auriculata G3 $1 PE PE foxglove Blue-ridge False- Agalinis decemloba G4Q Sx PX PX foxglove o PNDI Project Small-flowered Agalinis paupercula G5 S1 PE PE Planning False-foxglove Environmental Agrostis altissima Tall Bentgrass G4 Sx PX PX Review Aletris farinosa Colic-root G5 S1 TU PE Northern Water- Alisma triviale G5 S1 PE PE NOTE:Clicking plantain this link opens a Alnus viridis Mountain Alder G5 S1 PE PE new browser Alopecurus aequalis Short-awn Foxtail G5 S3 N TU PS window Amaranthus Waterhemp G5 S3 PR PR cannabinus Ragweed Amelanchier Oblong-fruited G5 $1 PE PE bartramiana Serviceberry Amelanchier Serviceberry G5 SNR N UEF canadensis http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/PlantsPage.aspx
    [Show full text]
  • Lundberg Et Al. 2009
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51 (2009) 269–280 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Allopolyploidy in Fragariinae (Rosaceae): Comparing four DNA sequence regions, with comments on classification Magnus Lundberg a,*, Mats Töpel b, Bente Eriksen b, Johan A.A. Nylander a, Torsten Eriksson a,c a Department of Botany, Stockholm University, SE-10691, Stockholm, Sweden b Department of Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg University, Box 461, SE-40530, Göteborg, Sweden c Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, SE-10405, Stockholm, Sweden article info abstract Article history: Potential events of allopolyploidy may be indicated by incongruences between separate phylogenies Received 23 June 2008 based on plastid and nuclear gene sequences. We sequenced two plastid regions and two nuclear ribo- Revised 25 February 2009 somal regions for 34 ingroup taxa in Fragariinae (Rosaceae), and six outgroup taxa. We found five well Accepted 26 February 2009 supported incongruences that might indicate allopolyploidy events. The incongruences involved Aphanes Available online 5 March 2009 arvensis, Potentilla miyabei, Potentilla cuneata, Fragaria vesca/moschata, and the Drymocallis clade. We eval- uated the strength of conflict and conclude that allopolyploidy may be hypothesised in the four first Keywords: cases. Phylogenies were estimated using Bayesian inference and analyses were evaluated using conver- Allopolyploidy gence diagnostics. Taxonomic implications are discussed for genera such as Alchemilla, Sibbaldianthe, Cha- Fragariinae Incongruence maerhodos, Drymocallis and Fragaria, and for the monospecific Sibbaldiopsis and Potaninia that are nested Molecular phylogeny inside other genera. Two orphan Potentilla species, P. miyabei and P. cuneata are placed in Fragariinae.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferns Robert H
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Illustrated Flora of Illinois Southern Illinois University Press 10-1999 Ferns Robert H. Mohlenbrock Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/siupress_flora_of_illinois Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Mohlenbrock, Robert H., "Ferns" (1999). Illustrated Flora of Illinois. 3. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/siupress_flora_of_illinois/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Southern Illinois University Press at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Illustrated Flora of Illinois by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF ILLINOIS ROBERT H. MOHLENBROCK, General Editor THE ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF ILLINOIS s Second Edition Robert H. Mohlenbrock SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY PRESS Carbondale and Edwardsville COPYRIGHT© 1967 by Southern Illinois University Press SECOND EDITION COPYRIGHT © 1999 by the Board of Trustees, Southern Illinois University All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 02 01 00 99 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mohlenbrock, Robert H., 1931- Ferns I Robert H. Mohlenbrock. - 2nd ed. p. em.- (The illustrated flora of Illinois) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Ferns-Illinois-Identification. 2. Ferns-Illinois-Pictorial works. 3. Ferns-Illinois-Geographical distribution-Maps. 4. Botanical illustration. I. Title. II. Series. QK525.5.I4M6 1999 587'.3'09773-dc21 99-17308 ISBN 0-8093-2255-2 (cloth: alk. paper) CIP The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.§ This book is dedicated to Miss E.
    [Show full text]
  • Sibbaldiopsis Tridentata (Aiton) Rydberg
    Common Name: MOUNTAIN CINQUEFOIL Scientific Name: Sibbaldiopsis tridentata (Aiton) Rydberg Other Commonly Used Names: three-toothed cinquefoil, three-toothed five-fingers Previously Used Scientific Names: Potentilla tridentata Aiton Family: Rosaceae (rose) Rarity Ranks: G5/S1 State Legal Status: Endangered Federal Legal Status: none Federal Wetland Status: none Description: Perennial herb with slightly woody stems, usually 3 - 4 inches (7 - 10 cm) tall (rarely up to 12 inches), sprawling or forming clumps and mats. Leaves evergreen with 3 oblong leaflets, - 1 inch (1.5 - 2.5 cm) long, with 3 - 5 teeth at the tip; base of the leaf stalk with a toothed sheath (stipule). Flowers about ¾ inch (2 cm) wide, with 5 white petals; 5 green, showy sepals; and 25 - 30 showy, white stamens. Fruits dry, hairy, and seed-like, in a stalked cluster. Similar Species: Wild strawberry (Fragaria virginiana) and mock strawberry (Duchesnea indica) have hairy stems, red fruits, and deciduous, oval leaflets with toothed margins. Common cinquefoil species (Potentilla simplex and P. canadensis) have yellow flowers and 5 leaflets. Related Rare Species: None in Georgia. Habitat: High-elevation rocky clearings and mountaintop balds. Life History: Little is known about the life history of mountain cinquefoil. Its flowers are probably pollinated by small bees and flies. Survey Recommendations: Surveys are best conducted during flowering (June–August); however, the evergreen leaves turn reddish in the winter and are distinctive all year. Range: Georgia, Tennessee, North Carolina, north to Canada, west to Iowa and North Dakota. It is common in Canada and New England, rare further south and west. Threats: Clearing, logging, development of high-elevation summits.
    [Show full text]
  • New Award Named for Tom Patrick
    Volume 94 Number 4 July 2019 Georgia Botanical Society IN THIS New Award Named for Tom Patrick ISSUE: As we all know, our Georgia Botanical Society (BotSoc) is among a number of groups interested in the conservation of botanical resources. Another such group, coordinated Society News by Jennifer F. Ceska, is the Georgia Plant Conservation Alliance (GPCA), a network of - P3 more than forty universities, botanical gardens, zoos, state and federal agencies, ESA News - conservation organizations (including BotSoc) and private companies and individuals committed to botanical preservation and protection. Headquartered at the State P4 Botanical Garden of Georgia in Athens, the GPCA’s range includes the entire state of Field Trip Georgia and beyond. In fact, The National Association of Environmental Professionals, Reports - P5 during their May 20, 2019 meeting in Baltimore, awarded GPCA with an honorable mention for environmental excellence . Upcoming Field Trips - During the GPCA meeting of May 16, 2019 at the Beech Hollow Wildflower Farm in P11 Lexington, Georgia, the attendees beheld a wonderful ceremony. Tom Patrick was recognized by the GPCA for his many years of botanical excellence and commitment to the study and preservation of Georgia’s native flora. His award, represented by a specially designed medallion, was presented by Jennifer Cruse-Sanders, Director at State Botanical Garden of Georgia. The medallion’s inscription reads: “Tom Patrick, 2019 For Lifetime Achievement in study, teaching and service benefitting Georgia’s native Flora. With love and gratitude, GPCA” This new award in honor of Tom Patrick, the first recipient, will recognize career-long dedication to botanical conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Forager's Way Herbal Botanicals
    Native Plants for Southeast Virginia FERNS Pycnanthemum muticum Forager’s Way Asplenium platyneuron Mountain Mint Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Ebony Spleenwort Rudbeckia hirta Athyrium asplenioides Black-eyed Susan Gaylussacia frondosa Dangleberry Lady Fern Scutellaria integrifolia Onoclea sensibilis Hyssop Skullcap Ilex vomitoria Yaupon Holly Sensitive Fern Sisyrinchium atlanticum Osmunda spectabilis Blue-eyed Grass Juniperus virginiana Royal Fern Solidago sempervirens Eastern Red Cedar Polystichum acrostichoides Seaside Goldenrod Leucothoe axillaris Christmas Fern Tradescantia virginiana Fetterbush Woodwardia areolata Spiderwort Magnolia virginiana Netted Chain Fern Sweetbay Magnolia POND PLANTS Morella cerifera HERBS Acorus calamus Waxmyrtle Herbal Botanicals Achillea millefolium Sweetflag Morus rubra Yarrow Baccharis halimifolia Red Mulberry Arisaema triphyllum Saltbush Persea palustris Jack-in-the-pulpit Chelone glabra Swamp Bay Endodeca serpentaria Turtlehead Rhus copallinum Virginia Snakeroot Hibiscus moscheutos Winged Sumac Euthamia graminifolia Rose Mallow Rhus glabra Grass-leaved Goldenrod Iris virginica Smooth Sumac Eutrochium dubium Blue Flag Iris Rosa palustris Joe-pye-weed Itea virginica Swamp Rose Hexastylis arifolia Virginia Willow Sambucus canadensis Evergreen Ginger Juncus effusus Elder Seasonings Hypericum hypericoides Common Rush Sassafras albidum St. Andrew’s Cross Peltandra virginica Sassafras Teas Lobelia puberula Arrow Arum Viburnum dentatum Downy Lobelia Pontederia cordata Arrowwood Lycopus virginicus Pickerelweed
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Plant Sale 2012.Xlsx
    SPRING PLANT SALE 2012 FERN SALES NO. SOLD F. INV. SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME NATIVE? ZONES SEASONALITY HEIGHT EXPOSURE & SOIL PRICE 40 0 40 JM Adiantum capillus-veneris (1 G) Southern Maidenhair Fern Yes 7 - 10 Deciduous 10 to 22" Lt. shade, alkaline 11.00 45 0 45 EC Adiantum x marisii Mairisii Maidenhair Fern Hybrid 7 - 10 Deciduous 12 TO 18" Lt. shade ,moist, alkaline 7.50 30 0 30 EC Arachnoides simplicor varig. East Indian Holly Fern No 7 - 9 Evergreen 12 to 24" Lt. shade 7.50 30 0 30 EC Athyrium asplenioides Southern Lady Fern Yes 4 - 9 Deciduous 24 ton 36" Lt. shade, moist, acid 7.50 96 0 96 CB Athyrium filix-femina 'Victoriae' Victoria Lady Fern No 4 - 9 Deciduous 24 to 36" Lt. shade 7.50 20 0 20 MV Athyrium x 'Ghost' (1 G ) Ghost Fern Hybrid 4 - 9 Deciduous 12 to 18" Lt. shade, moist 10.00 64 0 64 CB Athyrium niponicum 'Pictum' Japanese Painted Fern No 4 - 9 Deciduous 8 to 20" Lt. shade 7.50 50 0 50 MV Athyrium niponicum 'Pictum' (1 G) Japanese Painted Fern No 4 - 9 Deciduous 8 to 20" Lt. shade 10.00 30 0 30 EC Cheilantes tomentosa Woolly Lip Fern Yes 6 - 8 Evergreen 8 to 15" Lt. shade, moist-dry 7.50 15 0 15 EC Cheilantes wrightii Wright's Lip Fern Yes 7 - 8 Evergreen 3 to 10" Lt. shade, moist-dry 7.50 128 0 128 CB Cyrtomium falcatum Japanese Holly Fern No 7 - 10 Semi-evergreen 12 to 24" Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Botanical Collectors at Grandfather Mountain, NC
    HISTORY OF BOTANICAL COLLECTORS AT GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN, NC DURING THE 19TH CENTURY AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE FLORA OF THE BOONE FORK HEADWATERS WITHIN GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STATE PARK, NC A Thesis by ETHAN LUKE HUGHES Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies at Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science May 2020 Department of Biology HISTORY OF BOTANICAL COLLECTORS AT GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN, NC DURING THE 19TH CENTURY AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE FLORA OF THE BOONE FORK HEADWATERS WITHIN GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STATE PARK, NC A Thesis by ETHAN LUKE HUGHES May 2020 APPROVED BY: Dr. Zack E. Murrell Chairperson, Thesis Committee Dr. Mike Madritch Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Paul Davison Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Zack E. Murrell Chairperson, Department of Biology Mike McKenzie, Ph.D. Dean, Cratis D. Williams School of Graduate Studies Copyright by Ethan L. Hughes 2020 All Rights Reserved Abstract History of botanical collectors at Grandfather Mountain, NC during the 19th century and an analysis of the flora of the Boone Fork headwaters Within Grandfather Mountain State Park, NC Ethan L. Hughes B.S. Clemson University Chairperson: Dr. Zack E. Murrell The Southern Appalachian Mountains have been an active region of botanical exploration for over 250 years. The high mountain peaks of western North Carolina, in particular, have attracted interest due to their resemblance of forest communities in NeW England and Canada and to their high species diversity. From the middle of the 19th century, Grandfather Mountain has been a destination for famous botanists conducting research in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama
    The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama T. Wayne Barger1* and Brian D. Holt1 1Alabama State Lands Division, Natural Heritage Section, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Montgomery, AL 36130 *Correspondence: wayne [email protected] Abstract provides public lands for recreational use along with con- servation of vital habitat. Since its inception, the Forever The Red Hills Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) is a 1785 ha Wild Program, managed by the Alabama Department of property that was acquired in two purchases by the State of Conservation and Natural Resources (AL-DCNR), has pur- Alabama Forever Wild Program in February and Septem- chased approximately 97 500 ha (241 000 acres) of land for ber 2010. The RHFWT is characterized by undulating general recreation, nature preserves, additions to wildlife terrain with steep slopes, loblolly pine plantations, and management areas and state parks. For each Forever Wild mixed hardwood floodplain forests. The property lies tract purchased, a management plan providing guidelines 125 km southwest of Montgomery, AL and is managed by and recommendations for the tract must be in place within the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural a year of acquisition. The 1785 ha (4412 acre) Red Hills Resources with an emphasis on recreational use and habi- Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) was acquired in two sepa- tat management. An intensive floristic study of this area rate purchases in February and September 2010, in part was conducted from January 2011 through June 2015. A to provide protected habitat for the federally listed Red total of 533 taxa (527 species) from 323 genera and 120 Hills Salamander (Phaeognathus hubrichti Highton).
    [Show full text]