CASE ANALYSIS the Bothnia Line

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CASE ANALYSIS the Bothnia Line CASE ANALYSIS The Bothnia Line Carl Darenlind, Frida Vånder, Carolin Svensson Johnson, Gustaf Hammerbo Introduction The Bothnia Line is a railway connecting Nyland and Umeå traveling along the eastern parts of the coast of Norrland and is the largest infrastructure project in Sweden since the second world war (Pettersson 2010). It is a project built between 1999 and 2010, while the initial finishing year was 2006 (Pettersson 2010). The project was decided by The Swedish Parliament in 1997, although it was first mentioned in 1992 after the initial idea came from The Swedish Transportation Agency Part North in the early 1990’s (RIR 2011:22). There was also a company created to commence and build the project - Botniabanan AB. This company was created in collaboration with the municipalities of Kramfors, Nordmaling, Örnsköldsvik and Umeå (Lundman 2011). The ambition of the railway was to decrease the travelling time between Örnsköldsvik and Umeå, as well as the larger region of Stockholm and Umeå. Another important aspect for building The Bothnia Line was to relocate freight goods to the railway making it easier to transport goods along the coast of Norrland, which is a region heavy in timber, metals, and other material goods. The earlier railway connecting the region had reached its capacity ceiling, therefore there was a need for an increased railway infrastructure. The initial budget of The Bothnia Line was 11 billion, although the final cost of the project was 16 billion excluding interest. In a report from the Swedish National Audit Office (The Swedish NAO) the total cost was increased to 25 billion taking other upgrades on connecting railways into the cost (RIR 2011:22). This cost analysis has been criticized by Botniabanan AB but is an important factor when discussing The Bothnia Line, and why it overreached its budget so heavily (SVT Nyheter Västernorrland 2011). The Bothnia Line consists of 190 kilometers new railroad, 143 bridges, 25 kilometers of tunnels, and would together with the improved Ålandsbanan also decrease the travelling time between Sundsvall and Umeå. One of the major aspects for the cancelled trains (one in five trains between Örnsköldsvik and Umeå was cancelled during the first 6 months) is the ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System) which The Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket) has demanded that the government will postpone after the experiences from The Bothnia Line (Eriksson 2012). There have been 530 environmental issues concerning The Bothnia Line with 117 of them having been trialed in environmental court, which is one on the reason for the time delay as well as the budget overreach (Pettersson 2010). The total cost of the environmental issues has been 624 million SEK, with three times the amount of that if one includes the delays due to the court processes (Pettersson 2010). 2. Case Analysis In the report from The Swedish NAO they state that the initial intentions with The Bothnia Line was not met due to the need for further investments in other infrastructure projects such as Ådalsbanan to work efficiently (RIR 2011:22). The intended requirement for freight trains on The Bothnia Line would also not be met due to increased investments in Ostkustbanan, as well as problematic conditions surrounding railways connecting to The Bothnia Line. There is also a critique concerning the decision basis from The Swedish Transportation Agency as they have not mentioned the need for increased investments in Ostkustbanan, as well as there have been unrealistic expectations concerning the timetable for the trains running on the railway (RIR 2011:22). Furthermore, The Swedish NAO has given substantial critique concerning the understated travel time between Stockholm and Umeå, as well as between Sundsvall and Umeå. Over thirty minutes in the first example and thirty-five minutes in the latter one. The price point on 26 billion is 140 percent higher than the initial cost. The Swedish NAO states that this is due to increased societal changes and underestimations from The Swedish Transportation Agency. Furthermore, The Swedish NAO has criticized The Swedish Transportation Agency for underestimating the cost for their projects due to the projects being able to get a positive political decision. There was also a pre-investigation conducted by The Swedish Government that did not reach the same decisions as The Swedish Transportation Agency, but this was critiqued for not being unbiased and not being able to govern on its own terms (RIR 2011:22). The first known estimated cost of the project is from 2000 where it was estimated that the project would cost 12 200 MSEK, but in 2005 this was revised to 16 500 MSEK. A further breakdown of the costs highlights that 85 percent of the costs were due to indirect costs such as administration, detailed design, purchase of land as well as preparatory work. The remaining cost increase of 15 percent comes from the direct building of bridges, tunnels, groundwork, and electrical infrastructure etcetera (Lundman 2011). These increased costs also hindered the Swedish Transportation Agency to invest in other projects decreasing their major budget (Lundman 2011). This has further led Lundman (2011) to conclude that most of the cost overruns occur in early stages of a project – namely in the planning stages. The critique of the project is further enhanced by The Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, which in a debate article from 2008 states that the delta of Umeälven has unique natural values in a European perspective which has made the site a protected Natura 2000-area. This is an even higher protection for the nature than if it had been a National Park. The Swedish Transportation Agency did in the planning phase of the project lock themselves in into building the largest railway in Sweden, which according to all the studies would bring serious implications to the flora and fauna. This also was later proven correct due to all the environmental cases against The Bothnia Line (Pettersson 2010). References Lundman, P. (2011) ‘Cost management for underground infrastructure projects: A case study on cost increase and its causes.’ Doctoral thesis, Luleå University of Technology. Eriksson, Johan. (2012) ‘Botniabanan ännu en dyrbar tågförsening. ’ Svenska Dagbladet. 3 August. https://www.svd.se/botniabanan-annu-en-dyrbar-tagforsening/ (Received 2020-10- 10). Pettersson, Thomas. 2010. ‘13 miljarder kronor senare – grönt ljus för försenad Botniabana.’ Expressen. 28 August. https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/inloggad/13-miljarder-kronor- senare---gront-ljus-for-forsenad-botniabana/ (Received 2020-10-11). Riksrevisionen 2011:22. ‘Botniabanan och järnvägen längs Norrlandskusten – hur har det blivit och vad har det kostat?’ RIR 2011:22. Stockholm: Riksrevisionen. Isaksson, Carola. (2011) ‘Botniabanan Avvisar Kritiken’ https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/vasternorrland/botniabanan-avvisar-kritiken SVT Nyheter Västernorrland. 21 June. (Received 2020-10-11). .
Recommended publications
  • Ladda in Zoner
    RAPPORT Dnr TSJ 2015-4354 December 2015 Utveckling av utbud och priser på järnvägslinjer i Sverige 1990-2015 och Utvärdering av avreglering och konkurrens samt analys av regional utveckling RAPPORT Dnr TSJ 2015-4354 © Transportstyrelsen Väg- och järnvägsavdelningen Sektion Omvärld Rapporten finns tillgänglig på Transportstyrelsens webbplats www.transportstyrelsen.se Dnr/Beteckning TSJ 2015-4354 Författare Johan Brandström. Michael Stridsberg Månad År December 2015 Eftertryck tillåts med angivande av källa. 2 (14) RAPPORT Dnr TSJ 2015-4354 Förord Föreliggande rapport utgör en del av Transportstyrelsens marknadsövervakning rörande persontransporter på järnväg. Underlagsrapporten till denna rapport har utarbetats av Järnvägsgruppen vid Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan. Järnvägsgruppens arbete har resulterat i den rapport som återfinns som bilaga. Utöver detta har Transportstyrelsen ansett det relevant att lyfta och vidareutveckla vissa aspekter och observationer som görs i rapporten. Dessa tas upp i denna del och de slutsatser som dras står för Transportstyrelsen. Johan Brandström och Michael Stridsberg har varit ansvariga för rapportens framtagande på Transportstyrelsen. Borlänge december 2015 Stina Eklund tf. Sektionschef 3 (14) RAPPORT Dnr TSJ 2015-4354 Innehåll 1 BAKGRUND ...................................................................................................... 6 2 IAKTTAGELSER OCH SLUTSATSER ............................................................. 6 2.1 En mer prisvärd resa ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Bothnian Extension of the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Core Network Corridor - Summary of European Added Values
    The Bothnian Extension of The Scandinavian- Mediterranean Core Network Corridor Summary of European Added Values The Bothnian Extension of the Scan-Med Corridor Title of report: The Bothnian Extension of the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Core Network Corridor - Summary of European Added Values. Issued by: Intresseföreningen Norrtåg and the Bothnian Corridor regional collaboration. Contact: Joakim Berglund, project manager, The Bothnian Corridor Phone: +46 70-239 54 60 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www. bothniancorridor.com/en/ Author: Gustav Malmqvist, MIDEK AB Phone: +46 70-663 04 42 E-mail: [email protected] Norrtåg Intresseförening is a political association, founded in 2001, between the five northernmost regions of Sweden. In this association local and regional authorities collaborates on the development of railways in northern Sweden. Norrtåg Intresseförening initiated the establishment of Norrtåg AB which is the company responsible for the regional commuter trains in the northern half of Sweden. Norrtåg Intresseförening is co-ordinating the Bothnian Corridor regional collaboration since 2007, which involves the local and regional authorities but also collaboration with transport stakeholders, companies and industry associations. April 2018 – Version 1 2 The Bothnian Extension of the Scan-Med Corridor Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Ex-Post Evaluation of the European Capitals of Culture (Ecoc) Action 2014
    Ex-post Evaluation of the European Capitals of Culture Final Report Tim Fox James Rampton Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015 ISBN: 978-92-79-43847-9 doi: 10.2766/88424 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS Free publications: • one copy: via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • more than one copy or posters/maps: from the European Union’s representations (http://ec.europa.eu/represent_en.htm); from the delegations in non-EU countries (http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/index_en.htm); by contacting the Europe Direct service (http://europa.eu/europedirect/index_en.htm) or calling 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (freephone number from anywhere in the EU) (*). (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). Priced publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu). Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the report .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Banverket's Annual Report
    Banverket’s Annual report 2009 The Annual Report Banverket must submit an annual report to the Government not later than 22 February each year, in accordance with the ordinance on annual accounts and budget documentation (2000:605). The accounts must refer to the most recently completed financial year, in this case 2009. Some figures are accompanied by additional figures in brackets. Unless otherwise indicated the figures in brackets are the figures for the previous year. As the annual report includes many monetary amounts, the abbreviations SEK thousand (thousands of Swedish kronor), SEK million (millions of Swedish kronor) and SEK billion (billions of Swedish kronor) are used. Contents Director-General’s comments on the past year 4 Summary of operations during the year 6 Banverket’s operational areas 8 Developing Banverket’s railway network 9 Delivery of train paths 19 Sectoral duties and administration 26 Transport policy goals and results 32 Function goals – an accessible transport system 33 Consideration goal – safety, health and environment 44 Other reports 50 Banverket’s Profit Centres 56 Banverket Production 59 Banverket ICT 60 Banverket Railway Training Centre 61 Banverket Material Services 61 Employees 62 Financial Accounts 67 Income and expenditure account 68 Balance sheet 69 Appropriation account including presentation of authorisation 70 Funds statement 72 Summary of key figures 73 Notes 74 Signing of the Annual Report 80 Auditors’ Report 81 Board of Directors and Management Group 82 The Swedish railway network Brief facts
    [Show full text]
  • Curiosity and Passion
    A Bid from Umeå to Become the EU’s Northernmost European Capital of Culture Ever Curiosity and Passion – the Art of Co-Creation Curiosity and Passion – the Art of Co-Creation We are very enthusiastic and have a deep sense of gratitude that so many have already been co-creative in the process to make Umeå European Capital of Culture 2014. We will now proceed with our development of “the Culturized City/Region” with curiosity and passion, and in close collaboration with our citizens and partners in the Umeå region, as well as with our partners in northern Sweden, Europe and the world. Marie-Louise Rönnmark Jan Björinge MAYOR OF THE CITY OF UmeÅ (S) CITY MANAGer CHAIRPersON, POLITICAL STeerING COmmITTee, UmeÅ 2014 HEAD OF MANAGemeNT COmmITTee, UmeÅ 2014 Political Steering Committee: Lars-Erik Edlund, Alireza Mosahafi, Daniel Kallos, Lennart Johansson, Marie-Louise Rönnmark, Anna-Karin Sjöstrand, Tomas Wennström, Ingela M. Eriksson, Sven-Olof Edvinsson, Lena Sandlin (Absent from Photo: Eva Westman Modig) Page Contents 7 Part I. Basic Principles 35 Part II. Structure of the Programme for the Event 41 Part III. Organisation and Financing of the Event 46 Part IV. City Infrastructure 52 Part V. Communication Strategy 55 Part VI. Evaluation and Monitoring of the Event 56 Part VII. Additional Information 61 List of Photographs 63 Appendix 1. Umeå – A Symphony in Four Movements 69 Appendix 2. Umeå in Pictures Appendix 3. Umeå – The Movie Part I. Basic Principles Question 1: Why does Umeå wish to take part in the competition for the title of European Capital of Culture? What, for it, would be the main challenges of this nomination? What are the city’s objectives for the year in question? Setting the Scene: Umeå – An Unusual Place The real challenge of this bid is to call upon and use our northern spirit to raise provocative, yet significant new questions for culture to address; to explore ways of looking at traditional art forms; to pro- duce novel, innovative cultural expressions; as well as to use culture to help solve the challenges of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Infrastructure Pave the Way for Higher Property Demand?
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Uppsala University Bachelor thesis (C level) Author: Isak Myrestam Supervisor: Mattias Öhman Spring Term 2020 Does infrastructure pave the way for higher property demand? A difference-in-differences analysis of the effect of the Bothnia Line on real estate prices in Västerbotten Abstract This study explores the concept of improved train infrastructure in Sweden and how it affects the attractiveness of cities. The research uses a difference-in-differences model to determine whether the construction of the Bothnia Line in northern Sweden has had an impact on real estate prices in the municipalities Nordmaling and Robertsfors between 2008-2016. By employing the hedonic price model, the study finds evidence that house-specific factors such total house size in square meters, location near water and size of backyard all play a role in determining the final purchase price of houses in the two municipalities. However, the findings of this study do not indicate that the launch or the subsequent investments on the Bothnia Line has had any measurable impact on the real estate prices in the region. This is in line with previous research on the project. Keywords: Train infrastructure. Commuting. Real estate prices. Hedonic price model. 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................4 2. Background: The Bothnia Line ........................................................................................7 3. Theoretical framework
    [Show full text]
  • Mot Framtiden På Gamla Spår? Regionala Intressegrupper Och Beslutsprocesser Kring Kustjärnvägarna I Norrland Under 1900-Talet
    Umeå Studies in Economic History 28 Mot framtiden på gamla spår? Regionala intressegrupper och beslutsprocesser kring kustjärnvägarna i Norrland under 1900-talet Fredrik Andersson Doktorsavhandling vid Umeå universitet 2004 Avhandlingen ingår i serien Umeå Studies in Economic History. Denna avhandling ingår i det av Kommunikationsforskningsberedningen fi- nansierade projektet Botniabanan – Från samhällsekonomiska kalkyler till re- aliserade effekter inom Umeå-Sundsvall-Örnsköldsvik-Sundsvall korridoren som bedrivits i samarbete mellan institutionerna för Ekonomisk historia och Kul- turgeografi samt CERUM, samtliga vid Umeå universitet. © 2004 Fredrik Andersson Sättning: Erik Lindenius Tryck: Print & Media, Umeå universitet Umeå 2004 ISBN 91-7305-627-8 ISSN 0347-254-X Förord ”Har du någonsin byggt eller igångsatt ett jernvägsföretag? Har du det så behöver jag ej tala om för Dig huru besvär och tråk är fören- adt dermed, men ha du det inte så giver jag Dig det vänliga rådet att låta bli, ty det är ohjelpligt tråkigt” (Arvid Lindman i brev till Per Eriksson 29 juni 1902) Processen att skriva en avhandling om regionala intressegrupper runt norr- ländska kustjärnvägar har tidvis kunnat liknas vid en underkapitaliserad, och därför notoriskt krokig, smalspårig järnväg. Därför är det nu, när slutstatio- nen verkar närma sig, särskilt angeläget att tacka de som sett till att jag kom- mit av perrongen, embarkerat doktorandtåget, undvikit det mesta av ”besvär och tråk” samt hittills undkommit värre urspårningar. Den första som förtjänar ett tack är min handledare docent Lena Anders- son-Skog. Hennes oefterhärmliga förmåga att kombinera piska med morot, samt skarpa förmåga att se igenom det lika dunkelt tänkta som skrivna, har varit instrumentellt i att få denna avhandling klar.
    [Show full text]
  • Umeå Municipality
    Welcome to Umeå! Johan Gammelgård Director Administration and Innovation Europe– Sweden– Västerbotten – Umeå x Umeå facts Umeå founded: 1622 Population: 130 224 Average age: 39 Students: 31 500 Birches in citycentre: 3 000 Zooma in History of Umeå 3000 BC Rock carvings proof of first Umeå residents 1000 BC Settlements along the sea shores. 1622 Umeå is founded by King Gustav II Adolf. 1888 Fire in the city 1929 Nyströms Karosseri is founded (today Volvo Trucks). 1957 Umeå Hospital, Regional Hospital of Upper Norrland. 1965 Umeå University opens. 1995 100,000 residents, an increase from 50,000 in 1966. 2010 The Bothnia Railwayline opens. 2014 Umeå is the European Capital of Culture 1888 From the ashes came the city of birches • Umeå is growing • Population has doubled in 40 years • 1,000 new residents every year for 50 years • 700-800 new businesses every year • Largest labour market region in the North of Sweden • Well-educated workforce • One of the fastest growing regions in the country International • Just over half of the population born outside the municipality • 10 % are foreign born ( largest immigrant groups come from Finland, Iraq, Iran , Somalia , Germany, China and India) • 105 nationalities with more than 10 people Flight, train, car and boat • Sweden’s 6th largest airport, Stockholm-Umeå 60 minutes • Night and day train from Stockholm • Commuter train from Örnsköldsvik, Lycksele, Vännäs • European road 4 and 12 pass through Umeå • Ferry from Vasa in Finland Bicycle city • 262 kilometers of walking and cycling routes (increasing
    [Show full text]
  • ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM Yearbook 2014 Yearbook 2014
    ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM ARCTIC BUSINESS www.arcticbusinessforum.com FORUM Yearbook 2014 Yearbook 2014 Publisher: Lapland Chamber of Commerce ARCTIC BUSINESS FORUM YEARBOOK 2014 March 2014 Compiled and edited by Timo Rautajoki © Lapland Chamber of Commerce, 2014 3 ARCTIC SEA Airport Harbour Lakselv Railway Andenes Narvik Svolvaer Leknes Pajala Bodø Gällivare Mo I Rana Arvidsjaur Mosjøen Brønnøysund AND FINL NORWAY SWEDEN 4 ARCTIC SEA BARENBARENTSTS RUSSRUSSIAIA 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FOREWORD ....................................................8 2. ARCTIC COUNCIL, ARCTIC POLICIES AND ARCTIC BUSINESS .........10 2.1 Arctic Council. 10 2.2 Arctic Economic Council ..................................17 2.3 Report from World Economic Forum: “Demystifying the Arctic” ..................................25 2.4 USA and Alaska. 29 2.5 Crisis in Ukraine and the Arctic .............................38 3. NORTH OF FINLAND ............................................40 3.1 LAPLAND .............................................41 3.1.1 Investment Potential 2014–2025 ............................63 3.1.2 Development of the Region 2015–2020 ......................65 3.1.2.1 Investments expected to start first. 69 3.1.2.2 Investments waiting for better times .........................70 3.1.2.3 Key investment project of Lapland . .72 3.2 Oulu REGION .........................................74 3.2.1 Investment Potential 2014–2025 ............................86 3.2.2 Development of the Region 2015–2020 ......................91 3.2.2.1 Investments expected to start first. 93 3.2.2.2 Investments waiting for better times .........................93 3.2.2.3 Key investment project of Oulu Region. 95 3.3 KAINUU REGION .......................................96 3.3.1 Investment Potential 2014–2025 ...........................100 3.3.2 Development of the Region 2015–2020 .....................101 3.3.2.1 Investments expected to start first.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report State-Owned Companies
    2007 Annual Report State-owned companies 2007 This report can be ordered via Internet at www.regeringen.se Item number: N8012 Annual Report State-owned companies Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communication www.regeringen.se 001_omslag_plano_eng.indd1_omslag_plano_eng.indd 1 22008-10-06008-10-06 111:31:251:31:25 Contents 1 Financial overview 58 Kasernen Fastighets AB 87 Svensk-Danska Broförbindelsen AB, 3 Preface 59 Kungliga Dramatiska Teatern AB SVEDAB 4 The year in brief 60 Kungliga Operan AB 88 Sveriges Bostadsfinansieringsaktiebolag, 8 State ownership administration 61 Lernia AB SBAB 9 The government’s commission 62 Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB, LKAB 89 Systembolaget AB 12 Framework 63 Nordea Bank AB 90 TeliaSonera AB 14 State ownership policy 64 Norrland Center AB 91 Teracom AB 20 Sale of state-owned companies 65 OMX AB 92 V&S Vin & Sprit AB 22 Sustainable development 66 Posten AB 93 Vasakronan AB 32 Follow-up and assessment 67 Samhall AB 94 Vasallen AB 35 The state corporate sphere 68 SAS AB 95 Vattenfall AB 37 Two groups of companies 69 SIS Miljömärkning AB 96 Venantius AB 38 Companies operating under 70 SJ AB 97 VisitSweden AB market conditions 71 SOS Alarm Sverige AB 98 Voksenåsen A/S 41 Companies with special 72 SP Sveriges Tekniska 99 In process of being wound up societal interests Forskningsinstitut AB 102 Important events 43 State ownership of listed companies 73 Specialfastigheter Sverige AB 105 Changes in ownership 74 Statens Bostadsomvandling AB, Sbo 106 Accounting principles 44 Company survey 75 Stattum, Förvaltningsaktiebolaget
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Product Declaration for Passenger Transport on the Bothnia Line
    Passenger transport Environmental Product Declaration for passenger transport on the Bothnia Line Reg. no. S-P-00194 UN CPC 6421 Date 2010-03-19 1 Introduction This environmental product declaration (EPD) describes, from a This EPD sets out the environmental performance of passenger lifecycle perspective, the total environmental impact of pas- transport on the Bothnia Line. The following EPDs are also avai- senger transport on the Bothnia Line. lable for other Bothnia Line systems: Within the International EPD system based on ISO standard • EPD for freight transport on the Bothnia Line. 14025, this EPD was drawn up in accordance with Product • EPD for railway infrastructure on the Bothnia Line. Category Rules (PCR) 2009:03 for Rail Transport and Railway • EPD for railway tunnels on the Bothnia Line. Infrastructure (see www.environdec.com for further information • EPD for railway track foundations on the Bothnia Line. about the EPD system). • EPD for railway bridges on the Bothnia Line. The aim of this EPD is that it should provide transport buyers, • EPD for railway track on the Bothnia Line. stakeholders and decision makers with objective and reliable • EPD for power, signalling and telecom systems on the information on the environmental impact of rail transport. It Bothnia Line. takes both the infrastructure and the transport service aspects into account. As this EPD is based on data relating to Bothnia Line infrastruc- This EPD was developed by Botniabanan AB in cooperation ture and transport operations, the results might not be repre- with Banverket (the Swedish Rail Administration). It has been sentative of railway passenger transport on other railway lines.
    [Show full text]
  • A Programme Year in the Making
    A PROGRAMME YEAR IN THE MAKING CAPITAL OF CULTURE YEAR UMEÅ2014 Photo: Malin Grönborg. 5 8 6 7 2 4 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A PROGRAMME YEAR IN THE MAKING CAPITAL OF CULTURE YEAR UMEÅ2014 Programme content: Umeå2014 Production: Pondus Kommunikation AB Cover picture, book and sleeve: Northofsweden, Andreas Nilsson, Thinkstock, Per Enoksson and Garry Knight. Printing: Original, Umeå Book printing co-financed by: Swedbank Published April 2013 CONTENT 8 voices on Umeå2014 4–5 Introduction 6–9 Background 10–13 The seasons 14–15 Dálvvie (deep winter) 16–25 Gijrradálvvie (early spring) 26–33 Gijrra (true spring) 34–41 Gijrragiessie (early summer) 42–49 Giessie (summer) 50–57 Tjakttjagiessie (early autumn) 58–63 Tjakttja (true autumn) 64–71 Tjakttjadálvvie (early winter) 72–79 Initiatives 80–95 Co-creativity 96–99 The northern lands 100–103 Riga 104–105 Collaborations in Europe 106–107 Building for the future 108–111 How to get here 112–113 Those who are making it possible 114–119 8 VOICES ON UMEÅ2014 “I think that we’ll have “Culture is one of the most more unusual things powerful forces behind growth happening here. Things and development. In Umeå we you don’t normally see have invested more in culture otherwise. And maybe per resident than other Swedish even a surprise! I would municipalities. Today Umeå is like to see David Guetta, one of Europe’s fastest growing a DJ that I really like a lot”. cities and in 2014 we’re taking William Billman, the next step. Taking our unique 10 years old, Umeå experiences as a starting point we want to work together with you to continue developing culture-driven projects through- out the whole of Europe.
    [Show full text]