Natural Forest Dynamics in Boreal Fennoscandia: a Review and Classification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural Forest Dynamics in Boreal Fennoscandia: a Review and Classification Silva Fennica 45(5) review articles SILVA FENNICA www.metla.fi/silvafennica · ISSN 0037-5330 The Finnish Society of Forest Science · The Finnish Forest Research Institute Natural Forest Dynamics in Boreal Fennoscandia: a Review and Classification Timo Kuuluvainen and Tuomas Aakala Kuuluvainen, T. & Aakala, T. 2011. Natural forest dynamics in boreal Fennoscandia: a review and classification. Silva Fennica 45(5): 823–841. The aim here was to review and summarize the findings of scientific studies concerning the types of forest dynamics which occur in natural forests (i.e. forests with negligible human impact) of boreal Fennoscandia. We conducted a systematic search for relevant studies from selected reference databases, using search terms describing the location, structure and proc- esses, and degree of naturalness of the forest. The studies resulting from these searches were supplemented with other known works that were not indexed in the databases. This procedure yielded a total of 43 studies. The studies were grouped into four types of forest dynamics according to the information presented on the characteristics of the native disturbance- succession cycle: 1) even-aged stand dynamics driven by stand-replacing disturbances, 2) cohort dynamics driven by partial disturbances, 3) patch dynamics driven by tree mortality at intermediate scales (> 200 m2) and 4) gap dynamics driven by tree mortality at fine scales (< 200 m2). All four dynamic types were reported from both spruce and pine dominated forests, but their commonness differed. Gap dynamics was most commonly reported in spruce forests, and cohort dynamics in pine forests. The studies reviewed provide the best obtainable overall picture of scientific findings concerning the characteristics and variability of the unmanaged boreal forest dynamics in Fennoscandia. The results demonstrate that the unmanaged Fennoscandian forests are characterized by more diverse and complex dynamics than has traditionally been acknowledged. Keywords disturbance, age structure, stand replacement, cohort, gap, patch, natural disturbance emulation Addresses University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail [email protected] Received 2 November 2010 Revised 7 November 2011 Accepted 16 November 2011 Available at http://www.metla.fi/silvafennica/full/sf45/sf455823.pdf 823 Silva Fennica 45(5), 2011 review articles 1 Introduction Most of the remaining natural and old-growth forests of boreal Fennoscandia are located at Knowledge of the natural structure and dynamics northern, high-altitude and low-productivity sites of forests is important, both for basic understand- (Aksenov et al. 1999). Fortunately, some large ing of ecosystem functioning as well as for prac- pristine forested landscapes still exist where tical reasons. Forest habitats shaped by natural research on a variety of spatial scales is pos- forest development are those that the native spe- sible. Some of the most notable remaining land- cies have adapted to during their evolutionary his- scapes are located in Russian territory of eastern tory. Knowledge of the characteristics of natural Fennoscandia (Aksenov et al. 1999, Kuuluvainen forest habitats and their spatiotemporal dynamics 2002a), although not all of these areas are pro- at different scales is therefore indispensable for all tected, and thus face the threat of cuttings (Burnett efforts to sustain forest biodiversity (Angelstam et al. 2003). 1998, Bergeron et al. 2002). Activities using this In the southern Boreal Zone of Fennoscandia knowledge include restoration of ecologically only a low percentage of the forest cover can be impoverished managed forest ecosystems (Vanha- regarded as natural or near-natural, while consid- Majamaa et al. 2007) and the development of erably more remains in the middle and northern forest management strategies and silvicultural Boreal Zones. Often the few southern conserva- prescriptions that seek to emulate natural forest tion areas are so small that the full range of forest dynamics (Angelstam 1998, Bergeron et al. 2002, dynamic processes cannot be expected to occur Kuuluvainen 2009). For example, the debate on (Lilja and Kuuluvainen 2005). This consequently what constitutes ‘nature-based’ forestry (e.g. severely limits the opportunities to obtain rep- Diaci 2006, Larsen and Nielsen 2007) requires resentative regional understanding of the ecol- robust information on the structure and dynamics ogy of potential natural forests. For this reason, of the natural forest. Finally, it can be argued that sustained efforts should be made to combine a better understanding of the ecology of natural different methodologies and information sources forests is needed in order to devise ways to miti- to obtain a better understanding of the ecology of gate and adapt to future climate change (Keane natural forests. Although some effort has already et al. 2009). been made to synthesize information on natural Currently in boreal Fennoscandia, the oppor- forest dynamics in Fennoscandia (Kuuluvainen tunities for studying natural forest ecosystems 1994, 2002b, Esseen et al. 1997, Engelmark 1999, have become severely limited. The historical Engelmark and Hytteborn 1999), no systematic roots of the disappearance of natural forest lie in review of the existing scientific literature has hundreds of years of diverse and intense forest hitherto been carried out. exploitation. As a result of increasing population The aim here was therefore to conduct a sys- pressure during recent centuries, the most pro- tematic review (cf. Pullin and Stewart 2006, Pullin ductive southern forest types were the first to be et al. 2009) of existing studies dealing with distur- converted to permanent agricultural land. Other bance and successional dynamics of unmanaged wide spread uses of the forest included slash-and- forests in boreal Fennoscandia and to classify the burn cultivation, tar production, forest pasturage, forest dynamics reported according to predefined ship building and iron mining. The onset of forest categories. Although the studies reviewed do not industry in the 19th century further accelerated represent an unbiased or a representative sample the disappearance of primeval forest cover. How- of the prevalence of different forest dynamics ever, due to logistic restrictions, more remote types, they nevertheless can provide a large-scale areas remained unaffected until fairly recently. picture of what has been reported on the charac- For example, as late as the mid-19th century a teristics and variability of natural forest dynamics large part of the inland in southern and all of in Fennoscandia. northern Finland was covered by natural or near- natural forests; this estimate was based on the first national-level assessment of forest resources by C.W. Gyldén of 1850 (Lindholm 2004). 824 Kuuluvainen and Aakala Natural Forest Dynamics in Boreal Fennoscandia: a Review and Classification 2 Material and Methods 2.1 Geographic Scope of the Review 70 1 1, 5 The study focused on boreal forests in the Fen- 11 7 6 noscandian Shield (henceforth Fennoscandia). 12 23, 40 8, 13 35 Geographically, the area encompasses Norway, 5 6 26 14, 19, 20, 32 9, 3 28 Finland, most of Sweden, as well as the Mur- , ºN 27 41 36 39 39 mansk province and Republic of Karelia in 16 30 17, 31 Russia. Part of the Leningrad province in Russia Latitude 18 24 also lies within Fennoscandia (see Fig. 1). The 37 29 0 area of the Fennoscandian boreal forest stretches 6 33, 22 from 58°N in southern Norway and Sweden, to 4 69°N in northern Norway. Longitudinally, the area is demarcated by the Atlantic Ocean at the Norwegian coast at app. 5°E and the White Sea 5 off the Kola Peninsula at 41°E. 5 Most of the bedrock in Fennoscandia is made 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Longitude, ºE up of Precambrian granites and gneisses, cov- Fig. 1. Fennoscandia, with its eastern and southern ered by young Quaternary and Holocene sedi- limit, and the geographical distribution of sites of ments, consisting mainly of podzolized moraines the studies reviewed. The numbers refer to the list (Lidmar-Bergström and Näslund 2005). The area of studies reviewed in Appendix 1. The studies at exhibits a varied topography. In the west the regional scales are not included. These include Uut- Scandes reach heights between 1000 and 2500 tera et al. (1997) from the Ladenso forest inventory m above sea level (a.s.l.). A ridge at an elevation area in Russian Karelia, Sirén (1955), Aaltonen exceeding 200 m a.s.l. extends from the Scandes 1919 and Lassila (1920) in northern Finland, and mountain range through northern Finland and the Zackrisson (1977) in midnorthern Sweden. The Kola Peninsula, along which the summits of the following Russian studies also lack information on gently rolling hills (fells) rarely reach elevations the exact location: Kazimirov (1971), Zyabchenko above 1000 m. Finland and the southern part of (1984) and Volkov (2003). Sweden are mainly lowland, whereas Norway only has a narrow strip of lowland lying along the coastline. The main factor influencing the climate in Fen- 2000 mm on the Norwegian coast to 450–500 noscandia is its position between the Atlantic mm in the interior of northern Lapland (Tikkanen Ocean and Eurasia. The Scandes Mountains in the 2005). In southwestern Norway 11% and in north- west give rise to major differences in precipitation ern Sweden 38% of the precipitation comes as particularly between the western and eastern parts snow (FAO 2005). of the region. The Norwegian coast is highly mar- The main forest-forming tree species in the itime, while the eastern parts of Fennoscandia are region include Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L., intermediate between maritime and continental. Norway spruce Picea abies (L.) Karst., birches However, in all parts of the area at least moderate Betula spp., and aspen Populus tremula (L.). Of precipitation is recorded throughout the year. In these, Pinus sylvestris, Betula spp., and Populus the area covered by boreal forest, the mean tem- tremula are considered shade-intolerant pioneer perature of the warmest month (July) ranges from species.
Recommended publications
  • Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress
    Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress Updated May 22, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41153 Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The diminishment of Arctic sea ice has led to increased human activities in the Arctic, and has heightened interest in, and concerns about, the region’s future. The United States, by virtue of Alaska, is an Arctic country and has substantial interests in the region. The seven other Arctic states are Canada, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark (by virtue of Greenland), and Russia. The Arctic Research and Policy Act (ARPA) of 1984 (Title I of P.L. 98-373 of July 31, 1984) “provide[s] for a comprehensive national policy dealing with national research needs and objectives in the Arctic.” The National Science Foundation (NSF) is the lead federal agency for implementing Arctic research policy. Key U.S. policy documents relating to the Arctic include National Security Presidential Directive 66/Homeland Security Presidential Directive 25 (NSPD 66/HSPD 25) of January 9, 2009; the National Strategy for the Arctic Region of May 10, 2013; the January 30, 2014, implementation plan for the 2013 national strategy; and Executive Order 13689 of January 21, 2015, on enhancing coordination of national efforts in the Arctic. The office of the U.S. Special Representative for the Arctic has been vacant since January 20, 2017. The Arctic Council, created in 1996, is the leading international forum for addressing issues relating to the Arctic. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) sets forth a comprehensive regime of law and order in the world’s oceans, including the Arctic Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Fennoscandian Genomes Reveal Origin and Spread of Siberian Ancestry in Europe
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07483-5 OPEN Ancient Fennoscandian genomes reveal origin and spread of Siberian ancestry in Europe Thiseas C. Lamnidis1, Kerttu Majander1,2,3, Choongwon Jeong1,4, Elina Salmela 1,3, Anna Wessman5, Vyacheslav Moiseyev6, Valery Khartanovich6, Oleg Balanovsky7,8,9, Matthias Ongyerth10, Antje Weihmann10, Antti Sajantila11, Janet Kelso 10, Svante Pääbo10, Päivi Onkamo3,12, Wolfgang Haak1, Johannes Krause 1 & Stephan Schiffels 1 1234567890():,; European population history has been shaped by migrations of people, and their subsequent admixture. Recently, ancient DNA has brought new insights into European migration events linked to the advent of agriculture, and possibly to the spread of Indo-European languages. However, little is known about the ancient population history of north-eastern Europe, in particular about populations speaking Uralic languages, such as Finns and Saami. Here we analyse ancient genomic data from 11 individuals from Finland and north-western Russia. We show that the genetic makeup of northern Europe was shaped by migrations from Siberia that began at least 3500 years ago. This Siberian ancestry was subsequently admixed into many modern populations in the region, particularly into populations speaking Uralic languages today. Additionally, we show that ancestors of modern Saami inhabited a larger territory during the Iron Age, which adds to the historical and linguistic information about the population history of Finland. 1 Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany. 2 Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Archaeo- and Palaeogenetics, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany. 3 Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, PL 56 (Viikinkaari 9), 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Horseshoe of Fennoscandia, Norway, Rein Midteng
    The Horseshoe of Fennoscandia-A corridor for the long term survival of old-growth forest dependent species in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Rein Midteng, Asplan Viak. Norway. [email protected] 1.What is the Horseshoe of Fennoskandia? 2. What is its ecologial function? 3. Which subparts does it consist of? 4.Transboundary zones 5. How continuous and broad is the Horseshoe? 6. Key regions and areas in need of protection 7. Futher emphazis Un-protected old-growth forest in Pasvik 1.What is the Horseshoe of Fennoskandia? • Its a more or less continously corridor of old-growth forests from southern Finland/southeast Karealia to southern Norway/Sweden. • It consists of four subparts that are connected as a whole. These four subparts are although presented individually. In addition, it exists so called transboundary zones, which are “green” corridors with mostly continuously old-growth forests that stretch out from the Horseshoe. • Old-growth forests dominate the Horseshoe while in the rest of Fennoscandia culture forests dominate. • It consist of both protected and unprotected old-growth forests. • It includes a great variation of vegetationzones and foresttypes. • It is of major importance in the implementation of the Nagaya goals • It is of major importance for the preservation of old-growth forest species in Norway, Sweden, Finland and probably also in some parts of Russia. 2. What is its (ecologial) function? • It is a migrationzone east-west (since the last ice age), and the Fennoscandinavian countries share therefore to a large extent the same flora and fauna as Russia (low level of endemism). • It provides an exchange of species, individuals and genes to and forth in the Horseshoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Genome Diversity in the Central Siberian Plateau with Particular
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/656181; this version posted May 31, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Mitochondrial Genome Diversity in the Central Siberian Plateau with Particular Reference to Prehistory of Northernmost Eurasia S. V. Dryomov*,1, A. M. Nazhmidenova*,1, E. B. Starikovskaya*,1, S. A. Shalaurova1, N. Rohland2, S. Mallick2,3,4, R. Bernardos2, A. P. Derevianko5, D. Reich2,3,4, R. I. Sukernik1. 1 Laboratory of Human Molecular Genetics, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SBRAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation 2 Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 3 Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA 4 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 5 Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, SBRAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation Corresponding author: Rem Sukernik ([email protected]) * These authors contributed equally to this work. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/656181; this version posted May 31, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract The Central Siberian Plateau was last geographic area in Eurasia to become habitable by modern humans after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM).
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax Rusticola
    Key concepts of Article 7(4): Version 2008 Species no. 50: Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola Distribution: The Eurasian Woodcock has an extensive Palaearctic distribution. It breeds from the Azores and Ireland to the pacific coast of Russia. Birds winter in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, India and Southeast Asia to Japan. In Europe breeding occurs from Fennoscandia and Russia to the Mediterranean basin and the Canary Islands. Movements: Breeding populations in western maritime countries are sedentary, whilst those elsewhere are migratory. Scandinavian populations move southwest to winter mainly in Britain and France. Finnish birds move mainly south and winter mostly in Italy and the Balkans. Autumn movements start after the onset of frosts. Birds from the large Russian population are recorded wintering across most of West and Central Europe. The majority of birds are in their winter quarters by November but further (sometimes large scale) movements may occur in response to cold weather. Return migration starts in February in the Mediterranean region and the first half of March elsewhere. Population size and trends: The Woodcock is a difficult bird to count accurately. The European breeding population is estimated at 1,800,000 – 6,600,000 pairs of which 1,200,000 - 5,000,000 breeds in Russia (BirdLife Int. 2004A). The EU 27 population is estimated at 460,000 - 1,500,000 pairs (BirdLife Int. 2004A, 2004B). During 1990-2000 trends were stable across most of its European range, but declining in its Russian stronghold resulting in an overall moderate decline in Europe (>10%) (BirdLife Int. 2004A). Biological and behavioural aspects: Breeding: clutch size is usually 4 eggs (2-5); incubation 21-24 days; fledging period 15-20 days but sometimes able to get off ground at 10 days; independence: 5-6 weeks after hatching; brood: normally one brood.
    [Show full text]
  • LUCAS 2018 Technical Reference Document C3 Classification (Land
    Regional statistics and Geographic Information Author: E4.LUCAS (ESTAT) TechnicalDocuments 2018 LUCAS 2018 (Land Use / Cover Area Frame Survey) Technical reference document C3 Classification (Land cover & Land use) Regional statistics and Geographic Information Author: E4.LUCAS (ESTAT) TechnicalDocuments 2018 Table of Contents 1 Scope and Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2009 - 2012 ................................................................................... 7 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2012 - 2015 ................................................................................... 7 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2015 – 2018 ................................................................................... 9 Land cover and land use: general explications .............................................................................................. 9 Specific to the LUCAS classification ............................................................................................................. 10 The basic unit and the extended window of observation ........................................................................... 10 2 Land Cover Classification (LUCAS SU LC) ................................................................................................. 11 A00 ARTIFICIAL LAND .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Model of Glacio-Isostatic Movements and Shore-Level
    R-01-41 An empirical model of giacio-isostatic movements and shore-level displacement in Fennoscandia Tore Passe Sveriges Geologiska Undersdkning August 2001 Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 ISSN 1402-3091 SKB Rapport R-01-41 An empirical model of giacio-isostatic movements and shore-level displacement in Fennoscandia Tore Passe Sveriges Geologiska Undersdkning August 2001 Keywords: giacio-isostatic uplift, shore-level displacement, eustasy. This report concerns a study which was conducted for SKB. The conclusions and viewpoints presented in the report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily coincide with those of the client. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL MISSING PAGES ARE SUPPOSED TO BE BLANK Abstract Shore-level displacement in Fennoscandia is mainly due to two co-operative vertical movements, glacio-isostatic uplift and global eustatic sea level rise. The course of the glacio-isostatic uplift has been made discernible according to an investigation of the lake-tilting phenomenon (Passe 1996a, 1998). This information made it possible to start an iteration process that has given mathematical expression for factors involved both within the isostatic movements and the eustatic rise. There are two components involved in glacio-isostatic uplift. The main uplift, still in progress, acts slowly and is thus called the slow component. Arctan functions have proved to be suitable tools for describing the slow component. There are two main factors involved in the function used for calculation; As (m), the download factor (m) and 1 Bs (y ), which is an inertia factor.
    [Show full text]
  • North-West Russia As a Gateway in Russian Energy Geopolitics
    North-West Russia as a gateway in Russian energy geopolitics MARKKU TYKKYLÄINEN Tykkyläinen, Markku (2003). North-West Russia as a gateway in Russian ener- gy geopolitics. Fennia 181: 2, pp. 145–177. Helsinki. ISSN 0015-0010. This paper examines Russian energy development and plans and their geopo- litical implications around the turn of the new millennium. Argumentation is founded on the interpretation of the impacts of stakeholders’ interests on geo- politics under new societal conditions and the legacy of past energy produc- tion and logistics. Empirical evidence consists of material from the projects of Russian companies and the plans and politics of the Russian Government for developing the energy sector. The redefined borders and the geographical shifts of energy production have brought about the orientation of Russia’s energy development and interests towards the north. The former empire’s parts bordering on Russia in the west, Belarus and first of all Ukraine, have become problematic due to transit pay- ment conflicts. Consequently, Russian companies develop ports in North-West Russia as well as plan the construction of new oil and gas pipelines through the Baltic Sea Region. On the other hand, the northern location of the infra- structure plans is a geographical necessity, in the way that new oil and gas deposits lie in northern high-latitude zones. Energy stakeholders’ market-ori- ented interests greatly influence the country’s economic orientation to the ad- vanced economies and the global economy. Thus, Russia’s new energy geo- politics means economic integration and networking with partners (compa- nies, nations and economic areas) that are able to co-operate successfully in the economic sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Features of Winter Climate in Northern Fennoscandia
    RAPORTTEJA RAPPORTER REPORTS No. 2013:3 SOME FEATURES OF WINTER CLIMATE IN NORTHERN FENNOSCANDIA ILARI LEHTONEN ARI VENÄLÄINEN JAAKKO IKONEN NIINA PUTTONEN HILPPA GREGOW RAPORTTEJA RAPPORTER REPORTS No. 2013:3 551.584.2, 551.524.2, 551.578.46 Some Features of Winter Climate in Northern Fennoscandia Ilari Lehtonen Ari Venäläinen Jaakko Ikonen Niina Puttonen Hilppa Gregow Ilmatieteen laitos Meteorologiska institutet Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki 2013 ISBN 978-951-697-1 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-697-7 (pdf) ISSN 0782-6079 Unigrafia Helsinki 2013 Julkaisun sarja, numero ja raporttikoodi Ilmatieteen laitos, Raportteja 2013:3 Julkaisija Finnish Meteorological Institute Erik Palménin aukio 1, PL 503 Julkaisuaika 2013 00101 Helsinki Tekijät Ilari Lehtonen, Ari Venäläinen, Jaakko Ikonen, Projektin nimi Niina Puttonen, Hilppa Gregow EAKR “Ajoneuvoalan ja kylmä- ja talvitek- nologian sovelluskehityksen T&K ja koulu- tustoiminnan selvitys ja valmistelu (ACT) A31590” Nimeke Joitain Fennoskandian pohjoisosien talvi-ilmaston piirteitä Tiivistelmä Fennoskandian pohjoisosien talvi-ilmaston ankaruus luo erinomaiset edellytykset erilaisten laitteiden teknisen kestävyyden testaamiseen äärimmäisissä olosuhteissa. Autojen ja talvirenkaiden suorituskyvyn testaus talviolosuhteissa onkin ollut kasvava toimiala alueella. Myös alueen jatkuvasti kasvava matkailuelinkeino on vahvasti riippuvainen talvi-ilmastosta. Tietoa talvi-ilmaston alueellisesta vaihtelusta tarvitaan uusia investointeja suunniteltaessa. Tähän tarpeeseen vastataksemme olemme tutkineet
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Fennoscandia Via the British Isles: Evidence for a Novel Post- Glacial Recolonization Route by Winter Moth (Operophtera Brumata)
    a Frontiers of Biogeography 2021, 13.1, e49581 Frontiers of Biogeography RESEARCH ARTICLE the scientific journal of the International Biogeography Society Northern Fennoscandia via the British Isles: evidence for a novel post- glacial recolonization route by winter moth (Operophtera brumata) Jeremy C. Andersen1 , Nathan P. Havill2 , Brian P. Griffin1, Jane U. Jepsen3 , Snorre B. Hagen4 , Tero Klemola5 , Isabel C. Barrio6 , Sofie A. Kjeldgaard7, Toke T. Høye7 , John Murlis8, Yuri N. Baranchikov9, Andrey V. Selikhovkin10,11 , Ole P. L. Vindstad12 , Adalgisa Caccone13 , and Joseph S. Elkinton1 1 Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003, USA; 2 Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Hamden, Connecticut, 06514, USA;3 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, FRAM High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway; 4 Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Svanhovd, NO-9925 Svanvik, Norway; 5 Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland; 6 Faculty of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Agricultural University of Iceland, Árleyni 22, IS-112 Reykjavík, Iceland; 7 Department of Bioscience and Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark; 8 41 Royal Crescent, London W11 4SN, England; 9 Department of Forest Zoology, Sukachev Institute of Forest FRC KSC, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia; 1 0 Department of Forest Protection, Wood Science and Game Management, Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University, St. Petersburg, 194021, Russia; 1 1 Department of Biogeography & Environmental Protection, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 7–9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation,1 2 Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, PO Box 6050 Langnes N-9037, Tromsø, Norway;1 3 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fennoscandian Shield Within Fennoscandia
    SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE THE FENNOSCANDIAN SHIELD WITHIN FENNOSCANDIA JOAKIM DONNER DONNER, JOAKIM, 1996. The Fennoscandian Shield within Fennoscandia. Bull. Geol. Soc. Finland 68, Part 1, 99-103. Keywords: nomenclature, Baltic Shield, Fennoscandian Shield, Precambrian, Fennoscandia. Joakim Donner, Department of Geology, P.O. Box 11, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland The Commission for the Geological Map of the Platform (Russian Platform), as seen, for in- World, CGMW, recommended in a resolution at stance, on the maps presented by Holmes (1944, its General Assembly in Kyoto, 24-28 August 1965). It is for this area (Fig. 1), geologically 1992, "that the name Baltic Shield should be similar to the Canadian Shield, that the name replaced by the name Fennoscandian Shield". Fennoscandian Shield should, according to the This was taken as an international acceptance of above-mentioned recommendation, be used. the use of this name (Vorma 1993), earlier rec- The wish to replace the name Baltic Shield by ommended both by the unofficial Finnish work- the the name Fennoscandian Shield stems fore- ing group of bedrock stratigraphy (Aro 1986, most from a linguistic confusion, as pointed out by 1988) and by the Geological Survey of Finland Saltikoff (1992). The name Baltic Shield, as it has (Marttila 1988), and mentioned as an alternative been used, refers to the Baltic (Sea), the English name already by Simonen (1980). The area of name corresponding to Mare balticum in Latin and the shield with exposed Precambrian rocks, al- la Baltique in French, as also to the name in Rus- though largely covered by a sheet of Quaternary sian, Baltiiskoye morye.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives of the Green Belt“ Chances for an Ecological Network from the Barents Sea to the Adriatic Sea?
    Barbara Engels, Angela Heidrich, Jürgen Nauber, Uwe Riecken, Heinrich Schmauder and Karin Ullrich (Eds.) „Perspectives of the Green Belt“ Chances for an Ecological Network from the Barents Sea to the Adriatic Sea? BfN - Skripten 2004 Perspectives of the Green Belt“ Chances for an Ecological Network from the Barents Sea to the Adriatic Sea? Proceedings of the International Conference 15th of July in Bonn on the Occasion of the 10th Anniversary of the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) Editors: Engels, Barbara Heidrich, Angela Nauber, Jürgen Riecken, Uwe Schmauder Heinrich Ullrich, Karin 2 Cover Picture: The German Green Belt near Pferdsdorf (Uwe Riecken, BfN) Editors: Division II 1.3 Tel: +49-228-8491-242 [email protected] This publication is included in the literature database “DNL-online” (www.dnl-online.de) BfN-Skripten are not available in book trade. Publisher: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN) Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Konstantinstrasse 110 53179 Bonn, Germany Tel.: +49 228/ 8491-0 Fax: +49 228/ 8491-200 URL: http://www.bfn.de All rights reserved by BfN The publisher takes no guarantee for correctness, details and completeness of statements and views in this report as well as no guarantee for respecting private rights of third parties. Views expressed in the papers published in this issue of BfN-Skripten are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the publisher. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]