DOCSLIB.ORG

Canadian Ridership Trends Research Project, Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canadian Ridership Trends Research Project, Final Report CANADIAN Research Report RIDERSHIP TRENDS RESEARCH PROJECT Final Report Eric J. Miller, Amer Shalaby, Ehab Diab, Dena Kasraian June 2018 Canadian Ridership Trends Research Project Final Report Submitted to Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) Prepared by: Eric J. Miller, Ph.D. Amer Shalaby, Ph.D., P.Eng. Ehab Diab, Ph.D. Dena Kasraian, Ph.D. 7 June 2018 Table of Contents Part I: Report Introduction………………………………………..……..………….……...……...1 Part II: Literature Review ….…………………………………………..……….……..…...…......4 Part III: Survey of Canadian Ridership Prediction Practice ……………….……..……..…........26 Part IV: Data Overview and Ridership Trends ……………...…....…………....…..………........50 Part V: Modelling Ridership Trends ..……………………………….……………….……..…...67 Part VI: Analytical Tool for Policy Analysis ……………………..…………………….……….92 References and Appendices……………………………………………………….……...….…..96 Canadian Transit Ridership Trends Research Page ii – CUTA Final report /10.2018 List of Appendices Appendix A: Review of the academic literature ………………………………………...….…106 Appendix B: Review of transport authorities and research centres reports …...…………........113 Appendix C: Survey of Canadian ridership prediction practice ……………………………....120 Appendix D: Description of variables tested for inclusion in the final model ……...………...134 Canadian Transit Ridership Trends Research Page iii – CUTA Final report /10.2018 Part I Report Introduction Canadian Transit Ridership Trends Research Page 1 – CUTA Final report /10.2018 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW Recently, there have been growing concerns about the negative impacts of rising automobile use and road congestion on personal mobility, safety, air quality and climate change. To address these issues, special attention has been given to improving and expanding transit services in order to attract new riders in pursuit of a number of environmental and societal goals. This special emphasis on public transit has been reflected in many cases by additional capital investments in public transit systems across Canada. Despite these efforts, transit ridership across Canada has been slowing down and declining over the past few years. For example, ridership statistics in 2015 showed levelling-off and declining trends in ridership in many Canadian cities including Halifax, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Saskatoon, Calgary and Vancouver (Curry, 2017). Similar trends have been observed in many cities across the US. This highlights the need of a better understanding of the underlying factors affecting transit usage in each region. Understanding, measuring, and modelling the factors affecting transit ridership has traditionally been done by analyzing transit level of service factors in addition to socioeconomic and land use factors. Emerging evidence from New York and other regions1, however, suggests a strong impact of emerging new technologies and transport alternatives (e.g., Uber-like services and bike-sharing systems) on the use of public transit. Therefore, it is now more important than ever to provide a comprehensive and clear understanding of the reasons behind changes in ridership, while acknowledging the likely contribution of different emerging factors. The “Canadian Ridership Trends Research” project intends to perform this task and offers policy-relevant recommendations for improving transit service ridership across Canada. This document presents the final report for the “Canadian Ridership Trends Research” project. The project’s overarching objective is “to conduct an in-depth study on current and future conventional ridership trends through research and consultation with transit systems” which is “to provide an understanding of the correlation between causal factors and ridership in Canada and provide explanation(s) of ridership decline at a transit system, Census Service Area (CSA), and national level.” This report brings together the deliverables for the Canadian Ridership Trends Research project organized into five parts. Part II provides a comprehensive literature review of recent ridership prediction models and the factors affecting ridership at the aggregate level. The reviewed literature consists of both the academic literature (28 papers) and reports from transport authorities and research centres (14 documents) since 2000. The reviewed literature covers different levels of spatial aggregation (i.e., within-city or city level and multi-city studies) and temporal scope (including cross- sectional and longitudinal studies). This part provides an overview of the applied methods of ridership prediction. Furthermore, it synthesizes the findings of the literature on the significance 1 Fitzsimmons, E. (2017), Subway Ridership Declines in New York. Is Uber to Blame? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/23/nyregion/new-york-city-subway-ridership.html Canadian Transit Ridership Trends Research Page 2 – CUTA Final report /10.2018 of various transit ridership factors including the built environment, socioeconomic, transit service and other external and contextual variables. Part III presents the results of a survey of transit agencies regarding their ridership prediction practices. This survey was carried out in February and March of 2018 to understand the current state of ridership prediction practice and the key factors affecting ridership. Thirty six CUTA (Canadian Urban Transit Association) member agencies completed the web survey which amounted to a 35% response rate. This part summarizes the acquired information on ridership prediction methodologies used in the industry, ridership data sources and quality, the level of satisfaction with data and methods (both qualitative and quantitative), and suggestions for improvements. Part IV outlines the preparatory steps taken to describe and analyze the nationwide trends in ridership, its influential factors, and their relation over time. It starts with an overview of the various collected longitudinal datasets of ridership as well as the influential internal and external factors. Then, it demonstrates the trends in annual transit ridership, measured in millions of linked trips, from 1991 to 2016 at various levels. Finally, it presents the findings of a number of exploratory analyses in terms of the relationship between ridership and influential indicators nationwide. Part V provides an empirical investigation of variables explaining variations in transit ridership among transit systems and over time, using data from CUTA member agencies and a comprehensive set of indicators related to a) built environment attributes, b) socioeconomic factors, c) transit service factors and d) other external/contextual factors. The goal is to improve our understanding of the association of these various factors with past ridership trends, which should consequently improve our ability to forecast future trends. This part starts with the methodology used in the analysis, provides summary statistics of a number of key factors related to ridership trends and it investigates several case studies. It presents the results and interpretations of the implemented models before ending with some concluding remarks and policy implications. Part VI presents a description of three policy analytical tools that have been developed in MS- Excel to estimate and predict ridership as a function of various influencing factors. The tools are based on the models of the study. The main objective is to provide an understanding of the relative impact of each factor on ridership at the transit agency level as well as the national level, while keeping all other variables constant at their mean values. Canadian Transit Ridership Trends Research Page 3 – CUTA Final report /10.2018 Part II Literature Review Canadian Transit Ridership Trends Research Page 4 – CUTA Final report /10.2018 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 6 2. LITERATURE REVIEW METHODOLOGY ........................................................................ 6 2.1 Review of the academic literature .................................................................................... 6 2.2 Transport authorities and research centers reports ........................................................... 8 3. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ......................................................................................... 8 3.1 Academic Literature ......................................................................................................... 9 A. Within-city studies vs. city level and multi-city studies ............................................... 9 B. Research methodology ............................................................................................... 11 3.2 Reports of transport authorities and research centres ..................................................... 13 4. TRANSIT RIDERSHIP FACTORS ...................................................................................... 14 4.1 Built environment factors ............................................................................................... 15 4.2 Socioeconomic factors ................................................................................................... 16 4.3 Transit service factors .................................................................................................... 17 4.4 Other external/contextual factors ................................................................................... 19 4.5 Comparison between internal and external factors
Load more

Recommended publications
  • York Region Transit
    The Importance of Service Frequency to Attracting Ridership: The Cases of Brampton and York Jonathan English Columbia University CUTA Conference May 2016 Introduction • Is density the most important determinant of transit system success? • Can transit be successful in areas with relatively low density and a suburban built form? • Do service increases and reductions affect ridership? • The goal is to find natural experiments that can answer these questions The Region Source: Wikimedia The Comparison York Region Transit Brampton Transit • Focused expansion on • Developed grid network major corridors, of high-service bus including pioneering routes Viva BRT • Tailored service to demand on secondary corridors High Frequency Routes York Brampton Green = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Grey = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Source: Public Schedules and Google Earth Principal Findings • Increased service improves ridership performance • “Network effect” means that comprehensive network of high-service routes, rather than focus on select corridors, produces largest ridership gains • Well-designed service improvements can be undertaken while maintaining stable fare recovery Brampton vs York Service 1.8 1.6 1.4 /Capita 1.2 1 0.8 Kilometres 0.6 0.4 Vehicle 0.2 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 York Brampton Source: CUTA Fact Book Brampton vs York Ridership 40 35 Brampton: +57.7% 30 25 20 15 Riders/Capita 10 York: +29.7% 5 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Natural Gas Vehicle (NGV) Industry Recognizes Transit
    Canada’s Natural Gas Vehicle (NGV) Industry Recognizes Transit Agencies for NGV Leadership: Calgary Transit – for North America’s largest indoor refueling and maintenance facility BC Transit – for supporting NGVs in three communities Hamilton Street Railway – for Canada’s longest operating NGV transit fleet November 10, 2019 Calgary, Alberta Canadian Natural Gas Vehicle Alliance The Canadian Natural Gas Vehicle Alliance (CNGVA) is pleased to award its inaugural NGV Leadership Awards to Calgary Transit, BC Transit and Hamilton Street Railway. CNGVA’s first NGV Leadership Awards build on the collaborative efforts of industry and government in support of the NGV Deployment Roadmap: Natural Gas Use in the Medium and Heavy-Duty Transportation Sector – updated and recently released in collaboration with Natural Resources Canada. The awards celebrate market leadership in adopting natural gas as a fleet fuel and recognizing its environmental, economic and operational benefits. They recognize an operator’s investment in natural gas buses, training and infrastructure that has improved regional air quality, reduced greenhouse gas emissions and created local green jobs with an abundant, domestic resource. CNGVA applauds these fleet operators for their leadership and commitment to affordable, cleaner, quieter transportation. Calgary Transit Calgary Transit operates the public transit system in Alberta’s largest municipality. Operating a mixed fleet of LRT and bus vehicles, Calgary Transit is the first choice for getting around Calgary. The Stoney Transit Facility is a leading example of public-private partnerships (P3). The 44,300 square metre facility is the largest of its kind in North America, with the ability to simultaneously fuel six buses indoors from empty to full in about four minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Halifax Transit Riders' Guide
    RIDERS’ GUIDE Effective November 23, 2020 311 | www.halifax.ca/311 Departures Line: 902-480-8000 halifax.ca/transit @hfxtransit TRANSIT Routes The transit fleet is 100% accessible and equipped with bike racks. 1 Spring Garden 5 2 Fairview page 7 3 Crosstown 11 4 Universities 15 5 Chebucto 19 7 Robie 20 8 Sackville 22 9A/B Herring Cove 28 10 Dalhousie 34 11 Dockyard 37 14 Leiblin Park 38 21 Timberlea 40 22 Armdale 42 25 Governors Brook 44 28 Bayers Lake 45 29 Barrington 46 30A Parkland 48 30B Dunbrack 48 32 Cowie Hill Express 50 39 Flamingo 51 41 Dartmouth—Dalhousie 52 51 Windmill 53 53 Notting Park 54 54 Montebello 55 55 Port Wallace 56 56 Dartmouth Crossing 57 57 Russell Lake 58 58 Woodlawn 59 59 Colby 60 60 Eastern Passage—Heritage Hills 62 61 Auburn—North Preston 66 62 Wildwood 70 63 Woodside 72 64 Burnside 73 65 Caldwell (stop location revised) 74 66 Penhorn 75 68 Cherry Brook 76 72 Portland Hills 78 78 Mount Edward Express 79 79 Cole Harbour Express 79 82/182 First Lake/First Lake Express 80 83/183 Springfield/Springfield Express 82 84 Glendale 84 85/185 Millwood/Millwood Express 85 86/186 Beaver Bank/Beaver Bank Express 88 87 Sackville—Dartmouth 90 88 Bedford Commons 92 90 Larry Uteck 93 91 Hemlock Ravine 97 93 Bedford Highway 99 123 Timberlea Express 99 135 Flamingo Express 100 136 Farnham Gate Express 100 137 Clayton Park Express 101 138 Parkland Express 101 159 Portland Hills Link 102 182 First Lake Express 103 183/185/186 Sackville Express Routes 104 194 West Bedford Express 105 196 Basinview Express 106 320 Airport—Fall River Regional Express 107 330 Tantallon—Sheldrake Lake Regional Express 108 370 Porters Lake Regional Express 108 401 Preston—Porters Lake—Grand Desert 109 415 Purcells Cove 110 433 Tantallon 110 Ferry Alderney Ferry and Woodside Ferry 111 Understanding the Route Schedules This Riders' Guide contains timetables for all Halifax Transit routes in numerical order.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Version
    OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION | AFL-CIO/CLC JULY / AUGUST 2014 A NEW BEGINNING FOR PROGRESSIVE LABOR EDUCATION & ACTIVISM ATU ACQUIRES NATIONAL LABOR COLLEGE CAMPUS HAPPY LABOUR DAY INTERNATIONAL OFFICERS LAWRENCE J. HANLEY International President JAVIER M. PEREZ, JR. NEWSBRIEFS International Executive Vice President OSCAR OWENS TTC targets door safety woes International Secretary-Treasurer Imagine this: your subway train stops at your destination. The doors open – but on the wrong side. In the past year there have been INTERNATIONAL VICE PRESIDENTS 12 incidents of doors opening either off the platform or on the wrong side of the train in Toronto. LARRY R. KINNEAR Ashburn, ON – [email protected] The Toronto Transit Commission has now implemented a new RICHARD M. MURPHY “point and acknowledge” safety procedure to reduce the likelihood Newburyport, MA – [email protected] of human error when opening train doors. The procedure consists BOB M. HYKAWAY of four steps in which a subway operator must: stand up, open Calgary, AB – [email protected] the window as the train comes to a stop, point at a marker on the wall using their index finger and WILLIAM G. McLEAN then open the train doors. If the operator doesn’t see the marker he or she is instructed not to open Reno, NV – [email protected] the doors. JANIS M. BORCHARDT Madison, WI – [email protected] PAUL BOWEN Agreement in Guelph, ON, ends lockout Canton, MI – [email protected] After the City of Guelph, ON, locked out members of Local 1189 KENNETH R. KIRK for three weeks, city buses stopped running, and transit workers Lancaster, TX – [email protected] were out of work and out of a contract while commuters were left GARY RAUEN stranded.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Alberta: a Consumer Guide for Newcomers 1 SHOPPING in ALBERTA
    Welcome to Alberta: A Consumer’s Guide for Newcomers Table of Contents 1 GENERAL CONSUMER PROTECTIONS: RULES THAT PROTECT YOU WHEN SHOPPING . 1 SHOPPING IN ALBERTA .......................................................................................................................2 GENERAL SHOPPING INFORMATION ................................................................................................2 PRICES AND TAXES .............................................................................................................................3 SHOPPING ON THE INTERNET ...........................................................................................................4 DOOR-TO-DOOR SALES......................................................................................................................5 COMPLAINTS ........................................................................................................................................6 BUILD YOUR BUYING SKILLS .............................................................................................................7 2 FINDING A PLACE TO LIVE . 7 ARE THERE ANY LAWS IN CANADA ABOUT HOUSING? ..................................................................7 BUYING A HOME ................................................................................................................................11 TELEPHONE SERVICES ....................................................................................................................12 TELEVISION SERVICES .....................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project
    9.8 Date: May 25, 2021 Originator’s files: To: Chair and Members of General Committee From: Geoff Wright, P.Eng, MBA, Commissioner of Meeting date: Transportation and Works June 9, 2021 Subject Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project Recommendation 1. That the report to General Committee entitled “Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project” dated May 25, 2021 from the Commissioner of Transportation and Works be received for information. 2. That Phase 1 of the Service Integration Pilot Project recommendations for enhanced cross-boundary travel be received for information. Executive Summary The Ministry of Transportation has convened a Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table that includes representatives of all transit agencies and aims to improve connections and the customer experience for inter-municipal transit travel. The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) has engaged a consultant team to develop an agency-driven FSI model to present to the Provincial-Municipal Table in partnership with surrounding transit agencies including MiWay. Currently MiWay, along with several other 905 agencies, are prohibited from providing local service within City of Toronto, resulting in TTC providing duplicate service for their residents. In addition, transit fares are not integrated between the TTC and MiWay. In partnership with the TTC, the Burnhamthorpe Road corridor has been selected for a transit service integration pilot project in the near-term (targeting fall 2021). 9.8 General Committee 2021/05/25 2 Background For decades, transit service integration has been discussed and studied in the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA). The Ministry of Transportation’s newly convened Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table consists of senior representatives from transit systems within the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA) and the broader GO Transit service area.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Cochrane Transit Task Force Local Transit
    TOWN OF COCHRANE TRANSIT TASK FORCE LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL August 30, 2018 Contents Section 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: THE TRANSIT TASK FORCE ....................................................................................................... 8 Section 3: BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 GreenTRIP Funding & Allocation .................................................................................................... 10 3.2 GreenTRIP Funding Conditions ....................................................................................................... 11 Section 4: FINANCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 12 Section 5: PREVIOUS FIXED ROUTE OPTIONS ......................................................................................... 15 Section 6: THE RATIONAL OF PUBLIC TRANSIT ...................................................................................... 18 6.1 Local Transit Initial Assessment of Other Municipalities .............................................................. 18 6.2 Economic Rational for Transit ........................................................................................................ 21 6.3 Regional Traffic Congestion & Time and Fuel Savings ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2018
    Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2018 Final Report Prepared for Fredericton Transit Prepared by Stantec November 2018 Final Report Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2018 November 12, 2018 Prepared for: Fredericton Transit Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Transit Advisory TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW 5 1.3 MARKET CONDITIONS 11 1.4 SYSTEM COMPARISON 26 1.5 ROUTE PERFORMANCE 35 2.0 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 40 2.1 STAKEHOLDER ACTIVITIES 40 2.2 PREVALENT THEMES AND CONCERNS 43 2.3 SURVEY RESULTS 44 3.0 GAPS ANALYSIS 56 3.1 SERVICE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 56 3.2 TECHNOLOGY 56 3.3 FARES 57 3.4 PARTNERSHIPS 58 3.5 MARKETING 59 3.6 FLEET 59 4.0 SERVICE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 61 4.1 CURRENT NETWORK 61 4.2 NORTH SIDE HUB EVALUATION 65 4.3 PARK-AND-RIDE EVALUATION 72 4.4 SUNDAY SERVICE EVALUATION 83 4.5 ROUTING EVALUATION 94 5.0 TECHNOLOGY 114 5.1 CURRENT TECHNOLOGY APPROACH 114 5.2 FUTURE TECHNOLOGY PROSPECTS 116 5.3 TECHNOLOGY RECOMMENDATIONS 122 6.0 FARES 127 6.1 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE 127 6.2 FARE PROSPECTS 135 6.3 FARE RECOMMENDATIONS 142 7.0 PARTNERSHIPS 147 7.1 CURRENT PARTNERSHIPS 147 7.2 PARTNERSHIP PROSPECTS 147 7.3 PARTNERSHIPS RECOMMENDATION 150 8.0 MARKETING 151 8.1 CURRENT MARKETING APPROACH 151 8.2 MARKETING PROSPECTS 154 8.3 MARKETING RECOMMENDATIONS 160 9.0 FLEET 162 9.1 CURRENT FLEET 162 9.2 FLEET PROSPECTS 162 9.3 FLEET RECOMMENDATIONS 164 9.4 FACILITY CONSIDERATIONS 167 10.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 169 10.1 ABOUT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 169 10.2 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA RECOMMENDATIONS 174 11.0 MOVING FORWARD 175 11.1 SUMMARY OF SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (0-2 YEARS) 175 11.2 SUMMARY OF MEDIUM-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (3-5 YEARS) 177 11.3 SUMMARY OF LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (5+ YEARS) 179 12.0 APPENDICES 183 12.1 THE NORTH AMERICAN BUS MARKET 183 12.2 FREDERICTON TRANSIT SURVEY QUESTIONS 189 FIGURES Figure 1 City wards of Fredericton.
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    COMMUNITY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA July 13, 2015 7:00 pm COUNCIL CHAMBERS 400 MAIN STREET SE Pages 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3.1 Minutes of June 8, 2015 1 4. PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD 5. STAFF REPORTS 5.1 Annual Review of Fees and Charges for Recreation Facilities and Programs 7 5.2 Feasibility of a Trial Bus Service Between Airdrie & Crossfield 18 6. COUNCIL SYNOPSIS 6.1 June 15, 2015 Council Synopsis 48 7. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS/QUESTIONS 8. NEXT MEETING - September 14, 2015 9. ADJOURNMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD JUNE 8, 2015 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Community Services Advisory Board of the City of Airdrie, in the Province of Alberta, held in Council Chambers with the following: PRESENT Chair Alderman K. Hegg Members Alderman D. Belyk L. Blanchette Alderman F. Burley C. Goodman D. MacEachen R. McMullen S. Quinn B. Ryan Staff C. Aragon V. Groen K. Harris M. Lock C. MacIsaac M. McAllister C. O’Donoghue D. Tinkler R. White ABSENT WITH REGRETS K. Anderson CALL TO ORDER The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. AGENDA APPROVAL 2015-CSAB-024 R. McMullen moved "that the Community Services Advisory Board accept the Adoption of Agenda agenda of June 8, 2015 as circulated." June 8, 2015 Carried MINUTES 2015-CSAB-025 Alderman Belyk moved "that the Community Services Advisory Board adopt the Adoption of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting of May 11, 2015 as presented." May 11, 2015 Carried STAFF REPORTS Town & Country Hall Lease Change K.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessing Public Transportation in a Post-Pandemic World
    Reassessing Public Transportation in a Post-Pandemic World Jeffrey Casello, Professor of Transportation Planning and Engineering, University of Waterloo William Towns, MES Planning, Region of Waterloo (Grand River Transit) Adam Fraser, MSc Civil & Environmental Engineering, Town of the Blue Mountains Readers interested in more information on this report are encouraged to contact the authors: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Introduction Following a stretch of disinvestment in the postwar period, municipalities and regions around the world, but particularly in North America, have been actively re-investing in public transportation since the turn of the 21st century in order to achieve a variety of public goals. Specifically, this renewed emphasis on transit has aimed to: - Improve social equity by providing low-cost, effective access to a wider array of economic opportunities than might otherwise be available to all households, as well as quality-of- life-enhancing activities; - Decrease the energy and carbon intensity of personal travel and contribute to climate change mitigation efforts; - Influence land use to generate more compact, higher-density development that ultimately reduces the total need for and cost of travel (among other public utilities); - Lessen the negative environmental impacts of automobile-oriented transportation infrastructure and operations. The global pandemic stemming from the novel coronavirus (or COVID-19) has caused significant disruption to life in general and municipal service delivery in particular throughout 2020. While much remains unknown about the virus, it has become clear that COVID-19, like other socially- transmitted public health threats, is (in the absence of a vaccine) best mitigated by maintaining physical distance between individuals and avoiding mass gatherings at which illness may be transmitted widely.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuta's 2006 Fall Conference
    February/février 2007 National Transit Employee Recognition Awards 2006 · Prix nationaux de reconnaissance des employés du secteur des transports en commun 2006 CANADIAN TRANSIT CANADIEN SUR LE TRANSPORT COLLECTIF CUTA’S 2006 FALL CONFERENCE COMMUNITIES IN TRANSIT CONGRÈS D’AUTOMNE DE L’ACTU 2006 COLLECTIVITÉS EN TRANSITION PLUS: 2006 Mid-Year Ridership Results Données semestrielles 2006 de l’achalandage Quick test fact: Q’Straint rear tie-down belts along with stainless steel floor pockets and fastening hardware are static pull tested with every shipment. www.qstraint.com 312983_Qstraint.indd 1 1/3/07 12:35:10 PM We Listen, You Drive Discover the new face of performance with the line of Nova Bus transit, suburban, and shuttle vehicles. Building on our reputation for quality, our bold new front styling reflects the sound engineering and unique design features you have come to expect from every vehicle we produce. At Nova Bus, the quality is built right in. We listen, You Drive. www.novabus.com 312983_Qstraint.indd 1 1/3/07 12:35:10 PM 311734_Nova.indd 1 12/11/06 10:35:40 AM Under 30' and 35' length 12 year/500,000 mile Altoona tested 102" wide Cummins ISB-02 engine 35" front door - Vapor Optional 42" centre door Allison B300 or B300R transmission 19 – 35 passenger capacity Meritor independent front suspension KIRKMAN BUS SALES LTD. BLUE BIRD PEARSON BUS 1-888-381-3010 COACHWORKS 1-877-794-7670 CALGARY, AB 1-800-486-7122 BRANTFORD, ON 4 WESTERN CANADA EASTERN CANADA February/février 2007 Vol. 17 No. 1 CANADIAN TRANSIT CANADIEN SUR LE TRANSPORT COLLECTIF February 2007/ février 2007 CUTA Editor • Rédactrice de l’ACTU : Maureen Shuell cover • couverture Executive Editor • Rédactrice en chef : Thanks to partnerships between the various orders of government, Janine Strom new funding is making significant improvements to public transit to Contributing Editor • meet the growing needs of Canadians.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Stratégique Du Sentier Récréatif Régional De Prescott Et Russell
    City of Clarence-Rockland Transit Feasibility Study Final Report October 2014 Final Report : Clarence-Rockland Transit Feasibility Study City of Clarence-Rockland Transit Feasibility Study Final Report MMM Project Number: 3414021 October 2014 ii Project Number – 3414021 – October 2014 Clarence-Rockland... a quiet, picturesque city nestled on the shores of the historic Ottawa River, an important waterway for early explorers, fur traders and missionaries. With its humble beginnings as a lumber town almost 140 years ago, Clarence-Rockland has matured into a beautiful city of a little over 20,000 people. Situated just 32 kilometers east of Parliament Hill and about 170 kilometers west of Montreal, the area offers both the quiet of the countryside and the urban offerings of a big city. Along with a healthy distribution of nature's splendor there's also plenty of things to keep urbanites busy. We are a fully bilingual community with a full range of churches, schools and sports facilities which offer endless choices for those who have grown accustomed to essential amenities. (From: http://www.clarence-rockland.com/index.php/en/ - July 7, 2014) Project Number – 3414021 – October 2014 i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and objectives ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Organization of the report ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]