2018-2038 Solid Waste Master Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2018-2038 Solid Waste Master Plan Dakota County, Minnesota 2018-2038 Solid Waste Master Plan Approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on July 30, 2018 Adopted by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on September 18, 2018 Acknowledgements 2018 Dakota County Board of Commissioners District 1 - Commissioner Mike Slavik District 2 - Commissioner Kathleen A. Gaylord District 3 - Commissioner Thomas A. Egan District 4 - Commissioner Joe Atkins District 5 - Commissioner Liz Workman District 6 - Commissioner Mary Liz Holberg District 7 - Commissioner Chris Gerlach 2017 Dakota County Planning Commission District 1 – Michael Greco; Vacant District 2 – John Ross; Lori Hansen District 3 – Jill Smith; Greg Oxley District 4 – Amy Hunting; Barry Graham District 5 – Ramraj Singh; Christopher Ross District 6 – Nate Reitz; James Guttmann District 7 – Anthony Nelson; Vacant Prepared By Dakota County Environmental Resources and Planning Department Staff TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................1 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 B. Master Plan Purpose and Framework ............................................................................................................2 C. County Progress Toward Policy Plan Objectives ............................................................................................4 D. Moving Forward .............................................................................................................................................6 PART TWO: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL ABATEMENT PLAN ...........................................................................................7 A. County Solid Waste Vision ..............................................................................................................................7 B. County Solid Waste Policies ...........................................................................................................................7 C. Strategies, Tactics, and Timing .......................................................................................................................7 1. Regional Solutions ................................................................................................................................... 10 2. Source Reduction and Reuse ................................................................................................................... 12 3. Collection Best Practices ......................................................................................................................... 15 4. Recycling Management ........................................................................................................................... 18 5. Organics Management ............................................................................................................................ 21 6. Non-Municipal Solid Waste..................................................................................................................... 26 7. Recycling Market Development ............................................................................................................... 28 8. Organics Markets ..................................................................................................................................... 29 9. Emerging Technology .............................................................................................................................. 30 10. Product Stewardship ............................................................................................................................... 31 11. Landfill Abatement ................................................................................................................................. 32 12. Toxicity Reduction and Hazardous Waste Management ........................................................................ 35 D. Implementation ........................................................................................................................................... 37 1. Public Education .......................................................................................................................................... 37 2. Environmental Justice .................................................................................................................................. 37 3. Phasing and Collaboration ........................................................................................................................... 37 4. Performance and Accountability ................................................................................................................. 38 APPENDIX A: EXISTING WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND COUNTY PROGRAMS............................................. 39 APPENDIX B: MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................................... 69 APPENDIX C: ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: REVIEW AND FRAMEWORK FOR MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ... 79 APPENDIX D: PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY ............................................................................................ 83 APPENDIX E: PROPOSED TIMING OF STRATEGIES ................................................................................................ 103 APPENDIX F: CROSS REFERENCE OF STATUTORY COUNTY MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENTS ............................... 107 APPENDIX G: MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY LETTER OF PLAN APPROVAL .................................... 113 APPENDIX H: DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION OF PLAN ADOPTION ........................................................ 119 PART ONE: INTRODUCTION A. Introduction The Dakota County 2018-2038 Solid Waste Master Plan (Master Plan) defines Dakota County’s plan for managing waste through 2038, in accordance with the State of Minnesota’s Solid Waste Management Hierarchy (Hierarchy) in preferred order: reduce, reuse, recycle, organics recovery, resource recovery (i.e., waste-to- energy), land disposal. And, with a state focus on organics recovery, this Master Plan is consistent with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Food Waste Recovery Hierarchy (Figure 1) with attention to food waste prevention and food recovery for people. The Master Plan builds on the strengths of the previous plan and identifies specific strategies to implement the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) 2016-2036 Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan (Policy Plan). This Master Plan replaces the Solid Waste Master Plan adopted by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on March 27, 2012. The Master Plan was revised in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 473.803 and 115A, which govern waste management in Minnesota, and require Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) counties (Figure 2) to revise their Figure 1: U.S. Environmental Protection solid waste master plans following the MPCA’s adoption of a revised Agency’s Food Recovery Hierarchy Policy Plan. The MPCA adopted a revised Policy Plan in April, 2017. Public meetings, surveys, and a comprehensive stakeholder engagement process informed the Master Plan. Through this process, more than 1,500 residents, business and industry representatives, public entity (city, township, school) officials, and other stakeholders provided 1) input on solid waste issues, barriers, and solutions and 2) feedback on potential strategies to meet the aggressive new recycling goal for TCMA counties in state law and state waste management objectives. See Appendix B for more information on the stakeholder engagement effort. In addition, the Master Plan aligns with Dakota County’s Strategic Plan goal for “A healthy environment with quality natural areas” that protects and maintains natural resources for the health and enjoyment of current and future residents. The goal reflects Environmental Resources Figure 2: Counties in the Twin Cities Department’s mission to “Protect, preserve, and enhance the Metropolitan Area (TCMA) environment for the health, enjoyment, and benefit of current and future generations.” This Master Plan is consistent with the Policy Plan and will be used to inform the 2040 Dakota County Comprehensive Plan (County Comprehensive Plan) and comprehensive plans for cities in Dakota County. Dakota County Solid Waste Master Plan: 2018-2038 Introduction, Page 1 Policy Plan County Master Plan County Comprehensive Plan City Comprehensive Plan Required update in 2018 Required update in 2018 County Comprehensive Plan: The County Comprehensive Plan establishes the long-range vision and high-level guidelines for key systems in Dakota County, including transportation, land use, environment and natural resources, and parks. It is currently under revision. The County Master Plan provides the next level of detail for solid waste management. City Comprehensive Plans: The Master Plan and County Comprehensive Plan serve as a framework to inform revisions to comprehensive plans for cities in Dakota County. City Comprehensive Plans are also currently under revision. B. Master Plan Purpose and Framework Master Plan Purpose The Master Plan communicates Dakota County’s vision, policies, strategies, and tactics for solid waste management over the next twenty years. However, a revision is anticipated in six years following the next Policy Plan
Recommended publications
  • Elk River Landfill Expansion – Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    TO: Interested Parties RE: Elk River Landfill Expansion – Draft Environmental Impact Statement The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on a proposal by Elk River Landfill, Inc. (ERL) to construct a horizontal landfill expansion at its existing site in the city of Elk River, Sherburne County. The Draft EIS is being distributed for public comment pursuant to Minn. R. 4410.2600, and will be on public notice until December 1, 2005. During that period, any person may provide comments on the Draft EIS to the MPCA. The MPCA will conduct a public informational meeting on this Draft EIS. The public meeting will take place at the Uppertown Conference Room, 13065 Orono Parkway, Elk River, Minnesota, on Tuesday, November 15, 2005, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Any person may appear and present comments during this meeting. Commenters are advised that all comments made in connection with this Draft EIS will become a part of the public record. A court reporter will be employed to provide a written record of meeting proceedings. Your comments and questions on the Draft EIS are important to the completion of the Final EIS, the adequacy decisions to be made by the MPCA Citizens’ Board (Board), and to future permits that may be considered for this project. The MPCA will prepare written responses to your comments, and will revise the Draft EIS, if necessary, prior to the Board consideration of the Final EIS. All commenters will receive a copy of the Final EIS. All persons on the mailing list will be notified in advance of the Board adequacy decision meeting, and any person may appear at that meeting and address the Board if desired.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk River Watershed Association Phase I TMDL Report
    Elk River Watershed Association Phase I TMDL Report Elk River Bacteria and Turbidity TMDL Big Elk Lake and Mayhew Lake Nutrient TMDLs Prepared by: Elk River Watershed Association 14855 Hwy 10 Elk River, MN 55330 (763) 241-1170 ext. 3 January 2009 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359-0249 (763) 479-4200 wq-iw8-14h Table of Contents ACRONYMS.................................................................................................................................V 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 INTRODUCTION/ PROBLEM STATEMENT........................................................... 2-1 3.0 APPLICABLE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS .................................................... 3-1 4.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................... 4-1 4.1 General Watershed Characteristics...................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Subwatersheds ....................................................................................... 4-3 4.1.2 Land Use................................................................................................ 4-4 4.1.3 Topography and Soils............................................................................ 4-7 4.1.4 Climate and Meteorological Data.......................................................... 4-7 4.1.5 Hydrology.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate Follow-Up Report 2008—2009 2008-2009 UMD Graduate Follow-Up Report
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Graduate Follow-up Report 2008—2009 2008-2009 UMD Graduate Follow-up Report Table of Contents Highlights of the Class of 2008-2009 .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Annual Statistics Comparison ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Internship and Study Abroad Participation .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Baccalaureate Statistics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Baccalaureate Teaching Statistics ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reported Annual Salaries...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Follow-up
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Update
    Big Lake Elk River Ramsey Anoka Coon Rapids Oak Grove Parkway OSSEO METRO Blue Line (LRT): Open 93rd Ave M ISSI METRO Red Line (BRT): Open SS BROOKLYN IPPI METRO Green Line (LRT): Open PARK RI (BRT): Est. 2019 V METRO Orange Line E 85th Ave R METRO Green Line extension (LRT): 2018 METRO Blue Line extension (LRT): TBD METRO Red Line extension (BRT): TBD Brooklyn Blvd Station under consideration Station Fridley BROOKLYN Metro Transit Northstar Line (commuter rail) CENTER updated 11/11/14 63rd Ave CRYSTAL Bass Lake Rd ROBBINSDALE Robbinsdale e v in A p e nn Golden e H Valley Rd t/ e e c a v it i z GOLDEN h tr la st e s a g n A d ll t P a k VALLEY n n Wlv a ill r e a e Di n E k k a P V s w n n Plymouth Ave u t M men o a a m V t P B o le n t u c h l r t B t B i re o e wn s s pe a ic v o e a tad s o E S ro te W N G D W P a e g v Target Field st e d A y t W w mon e e e k e e S Royalston y v v v t v ic - a n P R t r R e A o n A / MINNEAPOLIS a w A g A n t ia S t r l t S Van White d ie in li g r e to r e e v ll in o t i e d r m x t e S s p b C i ai ne a e ic al e a o rs F S H L V D W C R Penn e v n Ri li k t n e 21st St ra v h S Lake St F A t 10 l a t/ tr n e S en West Lake k w C Union Depot a to L id t M Beltline th S 8 3 t ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk River Parks and Recreation Master Plan Adopted June 2015 Powered by Nature City of Elk River Parks and Recreation Master Plan
    Powered by Nature City of Elk River Parks and Recreation Master Plan Adopted June 2015 Powered by Nature City of Elk River Parks and Recreation Master Plan Acknowledgements City Council Staff Mayor - John J. Dietz Cal Portner, City Administrator Ward 1 - Jerry Olsen Michael Hecker, Parks and Recreation Director Ward 2 - Matt Westgaard Chris Leeseberg, Park Planner/Planner Ward 3 - Barbara Burandt Steve Benoit, Recreation Manager Ward 4 - Jennifer Wagner Rodney Schreifels, Park Maintenance Supervisor 2014 City Council members Stewart Wilson and Paul Motin Parks & Recreation Commission Consultant Dave Anderson - Chair Hoisington Kogeler Group Inc. Dave Kallemeyn- Vice Chair Mark Ahlness Guenther Sagan We would especially like to thank the many members of the Ryan Holmgren Elk River Community who provided input on this plan. James Nystrom Mike Niziolek Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Trends 9 Chapter 3 Needs Assessment 17 Chapter 4 Framework 35 Chapter 5 Plan 39 Chapter 6 Implementation 69 Public Arts Plan Arts Plan 89 Appendix A Peer Community Survey 99 Appendix B 2014 Parks and Recreation Survey 105 Chapter 1 Introduction Plan Context and Purpose Elk River is “Powered by Nature”. Residents live here because of it, visitors expect it, and the city is defined by it. A vibrant historic downtown, strong neighborhoods, and thriving industry are complemented by a landscape rich in natural resources, which includes expansive forests, wetlands, oak savanna, prairie, agricultural lands, and the essential presence of the Elk and Mississippi Rivers. Parks and Recreation are the vital connection points between these incredible natural assets and the residents of Elk River.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk River Population
    Elk River Elk River is located 35 minutes northwest of downtown Minneapolis, located right in the middle of the highway 169 and 101 interchange. Land Area in Square Miles: 42.29 Average Commute Travel Time: 29 Source: Minnesota Department of Administration: County: Sherburne County Seat: Elk River Metropolitan Area: Minneapolis-St. Paul MSA Senate District 30: Mary Kiffmeyer House District #30A: Rep. Nick Zerwas US Congressional District#6: Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R) US Senate: Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D) US Senate: Sen. Al Franken (D) Population 2004 2014 Elk River 20,240 23,370 Sherburne County 79,030 90,158 State of MN 5,145,106 5,420,380 Source: Minnesota Department of Administration, State Demographer Median Household Income Elk River: $71,595 Sherburne County: $72,041 State of MN: $59,126 United States: $53,046 Source: U.S. Census Bureau Median Age Elk River 34.8 Sherburne County 34.3 State of MN 37.4 Elk River Age Demographics 70% 60% 50% 40% Percent 30% 20% 10% 0% Percent population Percent population Percent population Percent popuation 65 under 5 years ages 5-17 years ages 18-64 years years and over Age Range Source: U.S. Census Bureau Workforce Elk River 12,457 Sherburne County 49,249 State of MN 2,955,309 Source: U.S. Census Bureau Unemployment Rate Sherburne County 5.6% State of MN 4.4% United States 6.0% Source: U.S. Census Bureau Workforce per Industry in Sherburne County Real Estate and Rental Leasing Information Management of Companies and Enerprises Art, Entertainment, and Recreation Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing,
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Directory 2017
    Dakota County Recreational Directory Recreational Resources for Children and/or Adults with Disabilities April 2019 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 How to use this directory 3 Camps/Social Recreational Programs 4 Programs for the Arts/Movement/Physical Health 11 Adapted/Recreational Sports 16 Special Olympics 18 Horseback Riding 19 Swimming 21 Fishing & Hunting 22 Vacation/Travel 23 Local Civic/Disability Organizations 24 Outdoor Recreational Equipment 25 Additional Community Resources 28 Child Care Resources 33 Appendix 34 2 HOW TO USE THIS DIRECTORY The following directory is designed to assist families served by the Dakota County Developmental Disabilities Section in learning about various social/recreational options available for individuals with special needs. You will find that many of the programs listed here are designed specifically for children and/or adults with developmental and sometimes physical disabilities. This does not mean that programs designed for all children are not appropriate or desirable for your child with special needs. In the Appendix you will find listings of local Park & Recreation Offices, Community Education and other local organizations designed for all local citizens that provide group activities, classes or events which you might explore. Keep in mind that each city or cooperative will usually have an Adaptive Recreation Coordinator to assist and advise you and your children in how to best access their program. Local churches, should you belong, often are a good resource for integrated social activities. Also, you might wish to consult with the Adaptive Physical Education teacher/IEP case manager listed on your child’s IEP. They may be aware of local recreation programs specific to DD children and could facilitate participation in other after school sports or activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgments
    Acknowledgments The development of the Minnesota K-12 Mathematics Framework is the result of the combined efforts of many persons. Many stakeholders have worked collaboratively toward improving mathematics and science education in Minnesota. We are grateful to the members of the Board of SciMathMN, under the direction of Cyndy Crist and Kristi Rollag Wangstad, for affirming the impor- tance of this work and approving financial support for this effort. Special thanks goes to Sharon Stenglein, Mathematics Specialist at the Minnesota Department of Children, Families, and Learning. In her role at MDCFL, Sharon was responsible for facilitating the work to delineate state standards for mathematics when the process of establishing graduation standards began. She has worked continuously since then to guarantee that the teachers of math- ematics in Minnesota have had input into those standards and the revision process. Her vision for the Framework and her commitment to its implementation have been a source of inspiration and “quality improvement” in its development. The Framework’s Leadership Team met three years ago to outline the present state of mathematics and science education in Minnesota and set goals that could be met in this state document. They have worked collaboratively since then to forge a common outline for both the mathematics and science documents and have continued to provide valuable input, direction, and guidance to both the process and the product. Over one hundred thoughtful, talented, and committed K-16 educators from around the state par- ticipated in the difficult task of developing Chapter 3. During intense writing conferences, they brainstormed, argued and worked together to reach consensus on what K-12 Minnesota students should know and be able to do in mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Support Services and Crisis Intervention Directory September 2015
    Support Services and Crisis Intervention Directory September 2015 Developed by: Sherburne County Safe Child Council 1 AIDS AIDS Hotline & MN Aids Project (referrals for testing/phone counseling/information) www.mnaidsproject.org 1-800- 243-7321 or (612)373-2060 or (612)373-2437(TTY) Crisis Connection (24 hours / day).....................................1-866-379-6363 or (612)379-6363 Crisis Connection, Men's Line..............................................................................(612)379-6367 Sherburne County Public Health..www.co.sherburne.mn.us..(763)765-4000 or 1-800-433-5237 Hennepin County Public Health Clinic.(612)543-5555 Abuse / Neglect / Protection (Adult and Children) Domestic Abuse Anna Marie's Shelter. www.annamaries.org ........1-800-950-2203 or (320)253-6900 (24 hrs) Rivers of Hope...www.riversofhope.org.(763)295-3433 or 1-800-439-2642 (24-hrs) MN Domestic Violence Crisis Line .....................................................................1-866-223-1111 Runaway Youth Bridge for Runaway Youth, Mpls.. www.bridgeforyouth.org ..(612)377-8800 (24-hrs) Sexual Assault Central MN Sexual Assault Center(320)251-4357 or 1-800-237-5090 (24-hrs) Child Abuse Sherburne County Health and Human Services...(763)765-4000 or 1-800-433-5237 National Child Abuse Hotline...............................................................1-800-422-4453 (24 hrs) American Red Cross (Central MN Chapter) ...........................1-800-560-7641 or (320)251-7641 Chemical Dependency Al-Anon Hotline........................................................................................(952)920-3961
    [Show full text]
  • Sherburne County Resource Directory for Persons with Developmental
    SHERBURNE COUNTY RESOURCE DIRECTORY FOR PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Developed By: Sherburne County Developmental Disability Advisory Committee (DDAC) 2017 This resource directory is provided by the Sherburne County Developmental Disability Advisory Committee. This committee’s mission is to provide support to persons and organizations that work to enhance services for persons with developmental disability services. If you are interested in learning more about this committee or would like to attend a meeting, please contact Nicole Bender at (763) 765-4178. Some of the service options provided in the following areas must be directly coordinated through Sherburne County Health & Human Services Disability Services Unit. Sherburne County follows the eligibility and policy guidelines of the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) as well as policy guidelines specific to these services in Sherburne County. For more detailed information, or a list of most current service providers in the area, as well as Personal Care Assistance (PCA), please contact Sherburne County at (763) 765-4000. You can also visit the DHS website at www.dhs.state.mn.us . If you want more general resource information, please contact the Minnesota Help.Info line at (866) 333- 2466 or www.MinnesotaHelp.info. Support Services MnChoices MnCHOICES is a single, comprehensive assessment and support planning web- based application for long-term services and supports in Minnesota. MnCHOICES uses a person-centered planning approach to help people make decisions about long-term services and supports. MnChoices determines service eligibility for publicly funded programs and services such as; Developmental Disability Waiver, Consumer Support Grant, Personal Care Assistance, Family Support Grant, Semi-Independent Living Services, and Case Management.
    [Show full text]
  • State 0F Minnesota in the Supreme Court Order It Is
    STATE 0F MINNESOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that a hearing to be held before this Court in the Supreme Court, State Capitol Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota, on Thursday, March 17, 1977 at 9:00 a.m. on the proposed Rules of Evidence, recommended by the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Evidence. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that true and correct copies of the proposed Rules of Evidence be made available after January 10, 1977 upon request to persons who have registered their names with the clerk of this Court for the purpose of receiving such copy and who have paid a fee to be specified at that time to defray the expense. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that advance notice of the hearing be given by publication of this Order once in the Supreme Court Edition of FINANCE AND COMMERCEand THE ST. PAUL LEGAL LEDGER. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that interested persons show cause, if ! any the:y have, why the proposed rules should or should not be adopted. j All persons desiring to be heard shall file briefs or petitions setting \ forth their views and shall also notify the Clerk of the Supreme Court ;I in writing on or before March 1, 1977. I DATED: December 20, 1976 ! ! DAKOTACOUNTY ATTORNEY COUNTY ATTORNEY Yarch 16, 1977 John 0. Sonsteng Dakota County Government Cents 1560 Highway 55 Hastings, Minnesota 55033 (612) 437-3191, Ext. 222. 223 CIVIL DIVISION Robert F. Carolan Robert R. Distad Michael R. Ring Assistant County Attorneys ulr. John C. McCarthy CRIMINAL DIVISION Thomas F.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Atlas of Sherburne County, Minnesota
    Prepared and Published with the Support of COUNTY ATLAS SERIES THE SHERBURNE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, AND ATLAS C-32, PART A MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Sherburne County Harvey Thorleifson, Director thE MinnESOta EnvirOnmEnt and Natural RESOurcES Trust Fund AS RECOMMENDED BY THE LEgislativE-CITIZEN COMMISSION ON MINNESOta RESOURCES Plate 3—Surficial Geology BENTON COUNTY SURFICIAL GEOLOGY 94° 7' 30" W. 93° 52' 30" W. R. 31 W. 94° W. R. 30 W. R. 29 W. R. 28 W. 93° 45' W. 93° 37' 30" W. STEARNS Brook BENTON COUNTY MILLE LACS COUNTY R. 27 W. Qno Qnt Qci Qcd R. 26 W. COUNTY 320 Qci Stony MILLE LACS COUNTY Qct 6 Qnt Qno 320 Qct Qct 1 Qct 6 Qco By 1 Qnt Qcd Qbs Mississippi 320 1 6 Qp 1 6 1 320 gd Qa Qng St. Francis Qcd Qct Princeton Qco 1 6 Ql Qp Qe Qno Qa ISANTI COUNTY QntSt. Cloud320 Qp 300 Qnt Qcd Battle Qp Qci 300Rice Qco Qp Barbara A. Lusardi and Roberta S. Adams Qct ¤10 320 Lake Qct Qbs Rum River Qno Qnt Qno River 300 * A Creek * Qnt )25 3 Qci * A' Qa * Qng * Qp Qci Qci 2013 * River 300 300 Qng Qcd St. Francis ¤169 Qno * Qbs gd * Brook Qct Qno Qa River Qp * Qtu Briggs HAVEN PALMER * T. 35 N. SANTIAGO BLUE HILL Qp * BALDWIN T. 35 N. Elk Qno Ql Qp 300 * * Qci Creek * Long Pond Qa Qe Qnc River Rice Qa Julia * 45° 30' N. * Lake Qe 25 * * Qp Briggs * Qp 300 Snake 300 Qci Qnt 45° 30' N Qtl 300Lake Qno CORRELATIONA OF MAP UNITS Rush B 300 Cantlin B' * Elk R.
    [Show full text]