DOCSLIB.ORG

Recirculated Draft EIR for the Capitol Annex Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recirculated Draft EIR for the Capitol Annex Project Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Capitol Annex Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049066 Prepared for California Department of General Services 707 3rd Street, MS-509 West Sacramento, CA 95605 Stephanie Coleman, Senior Environmental Planner Prepared by Ascent Environmental, Inc. 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sean Bechta, Project Manager January 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................................................. iii 1 INTRODUCTION (REVISED) ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Background and Purpose of the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report ...................................1-1 1.2 Content and Summary of the Recirculated Draft EIR ........................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Environmental Review Process for the Recirculated Draft EIR ........................................................................... 1-3 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (REVISED) ................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Project Background and Need...................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Project Objectives.............................................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Project Location ................................................................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.4 Characteristics .................................................................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.5 Potential Permits and Approvals Required .............................................................................................................3-17 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 4.4 Utilities and Service Systems (Revised) .................................................................................................................. 4.4-1 4.12 Archaeological, Historical, and Tribal Cultural Resources (Revised) ...........................................................4.12-1 4.15 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare (Revised) ...................................................................................................................4.15-1 5 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (REVISED) ................................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Introduction to the Cumulative Analysis ................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Cumulative Setting ........................................................................................................................................................... 5-2 5.3 Analysis of Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................................................................... 5-7 8 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8-1 9 REPORT PREPARERS (RECIRCULATED DRAFT EIR)...................................................................................................... 9-1 Appendices Appendix A – Scope of the Recirculated Draft EIR Appendix B – Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 6.7, Judicial Review of Capitol Building Annex and State Office Building Projects Figures Figure 3-1 Regional Location ............................................................................................................................................................. 3-3 Figure 3-2 Site Location ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3-4 Figure 3-3 Project Components (Revised)..................................................................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 3-4 Visitor/Welcome Center Conceptual Sketches (Revised) ................................................................................... 3-7 Figure 4.12-1 Photograph of the State Capitol Building and Capitol Park (west end) ca. 1885–1895 (view to south) ............................................................................................................................................................. 4.12-11 Figure 4.12-2 Historic Architectural Resources Study Area .................................................................................................... 4.12-17 Joint Committee on Rules and California Department of General Services Capitol Annex Project Recirculated Draft EIR i Table of Contents Ascent Environmental Figure 4.15-1 Capitol View Protection Act Height Restrictions .............................................................................................. 4.15-3 Figure 4.15-2 Viewpoint Locations ................................................................................................................................................... 4.15-8 Figure 4.15-3 Existing Visual Conditions of the Project Site - Representative Photographs ........................................ 4.15-9 Figure 4.15-4 Existing Visual Conditions of the Project Site - Representative Photographs ...................................... 4.15-10 Figure 4.15-5 Existing Visual Conditions of the Project Site - Representative Photographs ....................................... 4.15-11 Figure 4.15-6 Existing Visual Conditions of the Project Site - Representative Photographs ...................................... 4.15-12 Figure 4.15-7 Existing Visual Conditions of the Project Site - Representative Photographs ...................................... 4.15-13 Tables Table 4.4-1 Utilities Providers for the Project Area ...................................................................................................................4.4-6 Table 4.4-2 Maximum Contracted Annual Surface Water Diversion (afy) for the City of Sacramento ...................4.4-7 Table 4.4-3 City of Sacramento Current and Planned Annual Water Demand and Sources of Supply .................4.4-8 Table 4.4-4 Landfill Capacity ........................................................................................................................................................... 4.4-11 Table 4.4-5 Estimated Solid Waste Generated by Operation of the Proposed Project ............................................. 4.4-16 Table 4.12-1 Built Environment Resources Located in the Study Area ............................................................................ 4.12-19 Table 5-1 Geographic Scope of Cumulative Impacts .............................................................................................................. 5-2 Joint Committee on Rules and California Department of General Services ii Capitol Annex Project Recirculated Draft EIR Ascent Environmental List of Abbreviations LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AB Assembly Bill ADA Americans with Disabilities Act af acre-feet afy acre-feet per year BMP best management practices C&D construction and demolition CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code Caltrans California Department of Transportation CAP Capitol Area Plan CARB California Air Resources Board CBC California Building Code CBD Central Business District CCR California Code of Regulations cfs cubic feet per second CHBC California State Historical Building Code CHP California Highway Patrol CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System City City of Sacramento CRHR California Register of Historical Resources CSGBD California State Government Building District CSO Combined Sewer Overflow CSS Combined Sewer System CSSIP Combined Sewer System Improvement Plan CWA Clean Water Act CWTP Combined Wastewater Treatment Plant DGS California Department of General Services Draft EIR Draft Environmental Impact Report EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EV electric vehicle Final EIR Final Environmental Impact Report FWTP Fairbairn Water Treatment Plant GSF gross square feet HVAC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning JRC Joint Rules Committee kV kilovolt LEED v4 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design version 4 LID Low Impact Development light-emitting diode LED Joint Committee on Rules and California Department of General Services Capitol Annex Project Recirculated Draft EIR iii List of Abbreviations Ascent Environmental LTCP Long Term Control Plan MCL maximum contaminant levels mgd million gallons per day MLD Most Likely Descendant MOU memorandum of understanding MTP/SCS Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NCIC North Central Information Center NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRHP National Register of Historic Places OPR Governor’s Office of Planning and Research PCC Public Contract Code PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of California Department of Transportation Statement of Ongoing Contracts As of 01 District
    State of California Department of Transportation Page 1 Statement of Ongoing Contracts as of 06/20/21 06/28/21 District 01 Location Awarded Contract Bid + CCOs Approved %Time Storm Water Resident Fed Aid Description Comp To date Est Comp % Work Plan Engineer Pgm Code Type Of Work Contractor This Month Accepted Message 01-DN-101-8.2/8.7 IN DEL NORTE COUNTY NEAR KLAMATH AT GOLDEN STATE BRIDGE, INC. CLAYTON MALMBERG $18,896,414 04/21/20 34% 01-0B0904 $5,157,126 05/08/20 PANTHER CREEK BRIDGE #01-0025 AND AT 3701 MALLARD DRIVE; 207 PROCE MALL 27% $1,310,631 08/05/22 HUNTER CREEK BRIDGE #01-0003 CRESCENT CITY, CA 95531 BENICIA CA 94510 REPLACE BRIDGE (707)496-5581 (925)372-8000 HA21 01-DN-101-12.5/15.5 IN DEL NORTE COUNTY NEAR KLAMATH FROM G R SUNDBERG, INC. SANDERS, KAREN $11,985,000 02/16/16 100% 01-0G1004 $11,984,109 05/04/16 0.4 MILE SOUTH OF WILSON CREEK BRIDGE 5211 BOYD ROAD 207 PRICE MALL 100% $0 04/09/21 TO 1.7 MILES NORTH OF RUDISIL ROAD CRESCENT CITY, CA 95531 ARCATA, CA 95521 DIR'S EMERGENCY F. (707)498-4009 OVER RUN (707)825-6565 ROADWAY STABILIZATION AND RETAINING 20.20 WALL R 201130 01-DN-101-25.5/27.4 IN DEL NORTE COUNTY IN AND NEAR S.T. RHOADES CONSTRUCTION, KAREN SANDERS $6,279,838 12/08/20 20% 01-0C6604 $1,447,194 12/29/20 CRESCENT CITY FROM 0.2 MILE SOUTH OF INC.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Sacramento California
    COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA Control No.: PLNP2010-00264 Type: GPB-RZB-UPB-REB-DGB TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: STONERIDGE QUARRY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONE, USE PERMIT, RECLAMATION PLAN, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONTACT: Jeff Gamel, Senior Planner, 874-5835; [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NOS.: 073-0020-008, 072-0110-045 and 065. LOCATION: The project site is located approximately three miles south of US Highway 50, and 25 miles east of the City of Sacramento in eastern Sacramento County, California. More specifically, the project site is located approximately 1.5 miles south of White Rock Road, and 500 feet east of Scott Road, in the unincorporated Cosumnes community planning area of Sacramento County (Supervisor District 5: Don Nottoli) APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Angelo G. Tsakopoulos Cunningham Engineering 7423 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 10 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200 Carmichael, CA 95608 Davis, CA 95618 Attention: Pete Dwelley Attention: Steve Greenfield OWNER: REPRESENTATIVE: Angelo G. and Katherine Tsakopoulos Law Offices of Gregory D. Thatch 7423 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 10 1730 I Street, Suite 220 Carmichael, CA 95608 Sacramento, CA 95811 Attention: Angelo G. Tsakopoulos Attention: Gregory D. Thatch STONERIDGE QUARRY PLNP2010-00264 073-0020-008, 072-0110-045/065 REQUEST: 1. A General Plan Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Diagram to remove the Resource Conservation Area (RCA) land use designation from 410 acres of the 1,360+ acre property and to add the Aggregate Resource Area (ARA) land use designation to 619 acres of the property. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineers News
    OPERA ~.-.; · NG ·ENGINEERS . LOC,Al 3 STATIONARY ENGINEERS lOCAl -39 I VOL a-No; 5 .-:D SAN FRANCISCO, CALif. -- Mav 15. 1950 --------------------~--~~--------~------------------------ .. Members Must ~ ' .... ~- . .. I I Have :O.nJy ,' State. ... f Dis~bility Plan t ByP. E:VANDEWARI{ . I Assistant Local Union. ·Manager .Again it is 1iec'essary to call. at­ ROOSEVELT, MltLER GET .FULL AFL BACKING; ~e ntion to the brothers that · a · re­ DISTRICT CONGRESSMEN ARE ENDORSED jlewed drive· is being made · upon California voters will go to the polls on June 6 to vote on ~he_ private ~nsura;nce - companj.ei\i , jobs, a matter carrying disability insurance -plans· I vital to the daily comfort and year-round se­ Calling for ·cancellatio.n of ·· such curity for themselves and.Jheil" families and now being loudly IJlaus. · · championed by candidates for public office. Bu~iness representatives of. the The stat.e's bigg.est labor organi- orgal)ization . will again. be calling I' upon Bew:are Th;s Vici,.ftus zation, a million-member chunk of . you to . sign. a release, which . ..,. U U H nn.; the American Federation of Labor, will be .presented to your employ- ENGINEERS BRING WATER-Shown ubove· at the grcund-b:reaking believes that James Roosevelt, eld- ei· 0 , if you are covered by a· private of a $12 million water pipeline project are union and city officials. B~ est son of the late great FDR, hi'S irsurance t H plan ana have- not al- : B~o. Victor Swanson, business manager of Loca.} 3, is seMnd :from . ;OW ·. ous~ng the most praetical solutions to the , rea a.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Name___6. Representation In
    RECEIVED FHR-&-300 (11-78) AUG 2 7 1982 United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name_______________ historic Blue Anchor Building (California Fruit Exchange) and/or common Same 2. Location street & number 1400 Tenth Stj not for publication city, town Sacramento 'v "vicinity of congressional district 3rd state California code 06 county Sacramento code 067 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X public X occupied agriculture museum _Ji_ building(s) private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted x government scientific being considered JL_ yes: unrestricted industrial transportation x N/A no military other? 4. Owner of Property name State of California, Department of General Services street & number 915 Capitol Mall vicinity of state California 95314 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. County Recorder' S Of f i ce street & number 901 "G" Street city, town Sacramento state California 95814 6. Representation in Existing Surveys City of Sacramento title Historic Resources Inventory has this property been determined elegible? yes no date 1981 federal state county local depository for survey records Sacramento City Planning Department, 915 I Street city, town Sacramento state California 95814 7. Description Condition Check one Check one X excellent • deteriorated unaltered x original site aood ruins _JL_ altered * moved date N/A fair unexposed * interior Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The Blue Anchor Building is an "L" shaped, two story structure constructed of steel and concrete, finished in stucco, and capped by a low-pitched red tile roof.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department Records
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8j390d9 No online items Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Sean Heyliger Center for Sacramento History 551 Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Phone: (916) 808-7072 Fax: (916) 264-7582 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.centerforsacramentohistory.org/ © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) CTY0008 1 Planning Department records Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Collection number: CTY0008 Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, CA Processed by: Sean Heyliger Date Completed: 2019-08-19 Encoded by: Sean Heyliger © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Dates: 1955-2008 Bulk Dates: 1976-1996 Collection number: CTY0008 Creator: Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department Collection Size: 16 boxes(16 linear feet) Repository: Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Abstract: The Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department records consist of 16 boxes of Sacramento residential and non-residential building surveys conducted mostly between 1976-1996. Each survey consists of a historical/architectural survey form which includes information about the structure such as building type, architect, builder, date of construction, style, significant architectural features, additions/alterations, evaluation desingation and a photograph of the structure. Physical location: 7H1, 7H2, 7I1 Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Collection is open for research use. Publication Rights All requests to publish or quote from private collections held by the Center for Sacramento History (CSH) must be submitted in writing to [email protected]. Permission for publication is given on behalf of CSH as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the patron.
    [Show full text]
  • Teichert Shifler Mining and Reclamation Project NOP Public
    Teichert Shifler Mining and Reclamation Project NOP Public Commenters 1. Rigo Torres 8.18.19 2. Matthew Pirtle 8.18.19 3. Lisa Nicholas 8.18.19 4. Pacific Gas and Electric Company 8.19.19 5. Elise Brandwajn 8.19.19 6. Gregory Ramirez 8.19.19 7. Jon Huffine 8.21.19 8. California Department of Conservation – Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources 8.22.19 9. California Department of Conservation – Division of Land Resource Protection 8.26.19 10. Julie Frommelt Payne 8.26.19 11. Aaron Johnson 8.27.19 12. Pamela Van Brocklin 8.29.19 13. Rudy Lopez 8.29.19 14. Joyce and Ranse Reynolds 8.29.19 15. Eric Dowdy 8.29.19 16. Mark and Katherine Stinson 8.30.19 17. Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District 9.3.19 18. Tim and Barbara Sharp 9.4.19 19. Annette Davis 9.4.19 20. Dale Sumersille and Dawne Koranda 9.4.19 21. Northwest Information Center 9.5.19 22. California Department of Fish and Wildlife 9.6.19 23. Heidi Frommelt Potter 9.6.19 24. Bea Leonardi 9.6.19 25. Cathy Stamey 9.6.19 26. Julie Payne 9.8.19 27. Native American Heritage Commission 9.10.19 28. Margaret Kronenberg 9.10.19 29. Ruth Schreiber (verbal comment) 9.10.19 30. Monique Marin 9.11.19 31. NOP Public Scoping Meeting 9.12.19 32. Dayle Murray 9.12.19 33. Joyce and Ranse Reynolds 9.13.19 34. Diane Tauzer 9.13.19 35.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    A Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 ................................................................................ A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ............................................................................. A-13 A.1.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-19 A.2 Project Information Meetings A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ............................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Dates, Locations and Attendance .............................................................................................. A-57 A.2.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-59 A.3 Section 106 Consultation A-65 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letters, November 2013 ................................................................... A-67 A.3.2 Comments from the November 2013 Letters ........................................................................... A-107 A.3.3 Section 106 Consultation Letters, April 8, 2014 ....................................................................... A-115 A.3.4 Section 106 Concurrence Letters............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • September 1968
    ~... .,..... • Shipyard Union Joins Local No.3 "Servi~g the men who move the earth!" *- * * ENGINEER NEWS 731 Amalgamated - - PUBLISHED TO PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE OF ALL ENGINEERS AND THEIR FAMILIES In Vallejo Meeting • The bittersweet odor of nostalgia-fed with -the incense of -old memories and old fellowships- usually permeates the currents of - . GUAM, WHERE AMERICA'S DAY BEGINS HAWAII, THE SO~H- STATE NO~TH E RN CALIFORNIA, THE GOLDEN STATE pomp and circumstance that mark the passing of old-line charter unions into the open arms of a larger brotherhood. •-.:! scent, strangely enough, was missing w:hen the 49-year Vol. 27-No. 9 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA __ _ .September, 1-968 This old civil service union, Local 731 ( IUOE) of the Mare Island Naval Shipyard was amalgamated with Locat_ Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers on September 7 in Vallejo, California. Maybe it was because both unions are issue of the same Inter- · IMPORT ANT NOTICE national parentage, or more simply because most men who operate In keeping with the action heavy equipment are like the taken at the Semi-Annual Meet­ colonel's lady-"brothers under the ing held on July 13, 1968, • skin." No matter the reason, 'joie whereby the membership con· de vivre' and the spirit of happy_ curred in the recommendation unity were everywhere evident at of the Executive Board setting the ceremonies celebrating the aside temporarily all but $1.00 official amalgamation this month. per month of the dues increase, which would have been forth­ International Vice President and Article VI of the Local 3 ·Business Manager AI coming as per By-Laws; In addition, the action Clem told the gathering of new was that the $1.00 per month Local 3 m embers, their wives and dues increase would not become officers that they were not in fact effective until October 1, 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of the Land 5/20/09 4:02 PM Page 96
    05112_gsl_128pg_r8_v8.qxd:Stories of the Land 5/20/09 4:02 PM Page 96 PAGE 96 C h a p t e r 07 Stories of the Land CHAPTER 7 — SOURCE AND SUBSTANCE OF CITIES The Natoma Camp at Excelsior and Jackson Roads constructed for the homeless during the Depression (courtesy of June Barmby Sandbakken). Photographer Dorothea Lange and American River migrant worker camp she documented in 1938 (courtesy of NARA LC USF 34-009903-6). 05112_gsl_128pg_r8_v8.qxd:Stories of the Land 5/20/09 4:02 PM Page 97 PAGE 97 C h a p t e r 07 Stories of the Land CHAPTER 7 — SOURCE AND SUBSTANCE OF CITIES From the late 1800s until World War II, the Brighton Township had supplied people in many American and European cities with fruit. In its first 50 years from 1860 to 1910, the population grew fivefold to over 2,500. Then the Depression hit and the farms and ranches suffered. People poured into California hoping to find employment in fields and orchards only to discover there was little or no work. Migrant workers from the Dust Bowl states set up camp on the south side of the American River and were photographed there by Dorothea Lange. Farms and farming equipment were repossessed. And, as was illustrated with the Johnson family’s loss of home and land at Walsh Station, Brighton experienced its share of suffering. he area was served by the railroad and many homeless people, referred to at the Brighton suffered from a double blow in those difficult years, as did many agricultural time as “hobos”, rode the rails during the Depression, wandering and looking for communities: although Roosevelt’s New Deal had begun to take effect in some areas, work.
    [Show full text]
  • TEICHERT CONSTRUCTION Established 1887
    *** All Quotes must have the Department of Industrial Relations # to be ACCEPTED *** 400 Sunrise Avenue, Ste. 300 All D.I.R.#s expired, a renewal letter must be included. Roseville, CA 95661 Ph (916) 757-6400 Fax (916) 757-6499 TEICHERT CONSTRUCTION Established 1887 Request for qualified bids from Subcontractors, Suppliers & Truckers for the following project: Project: US 101/De La Cruz Boulevard/Trimble Road Interchange Improvements – Contract C21001 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Bid Date: 5/18/21 @ 2:00 PM Docs & Plans Available from https://secure.procurenow.com/portal/vta Estimate: $50,600,000 Duration: 1360 calendar days (including 365 calendar days for plant establishment) Agency Goals: 5.26% SBE Project Description: Teichert Construction is requesting quotes from all qualified subcontractors and suppliers including certified SBE firms for the following items of work, including but not limited to: all materials, labor and equipment for CONSTRUCTION AREA SIGNS, TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM, PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE, REMOVE BRIDGE ITEM, MODIFY BRIDGE ITEM, CLEARING & GRUBBING, ROADWAY EXCAVATION, GRADING, STRUCTURE EXCAVATION, STRUCTURE BACKFILL, DITCHES EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION, HIGHWAY PLANTING, SOIL AMENDMENTS, HYDROSEEDING, EROSION CONTROL, IRRIGATION SYSTEM, TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL , AGGREGATE SUB BASE, AGGREGATE BASE, ASPHALT CONCRETE, PAVING ASPHALT (ASPHALT CONCRETE), PLACE ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE & MISC, RECYCLE, RECLAIM ASPHALT CONCRETE, PORTLAND CEMENT & CONCRETE PAVEMENT, FURNISH & DRIVE PILING, CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement ...................................................................................... A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 .......................................................................... A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ....................................................................... A-13 A.1.3 Comments from the Early Notification Announcement ........................................................ A-19 A.2 Project Meetings ................................................................................................................ A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ......................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Project Meeting Sign-In Sheets, September 2013 ............................................................... A-59 A.2.3 Comments from the Project Meeting ................................................................................... A-65 A.3 Section 106 Consultation .................................................................................................. A-71 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letter, November 21, 2013 ......................................................... A-73 A.3.2 Comments from the Section 106 Consultation Letter .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Caltrans Partnering Ceremony Program
    20TH ANNUAL CALTRANS EXCELLENCE IN PARTNERING AWARDS CEREMONY th ® Partnering 20th Annual California Department of Transportation Excellence in Partnering Awards Ceremony 20 August 18, 2020 | 2:00pm – 4:00pm Welcome .................................................................................................................... Devin Porr HQ Partnering Program Manager California Department of Transportation Partnering at Caltrans ............................................................................. Rachel Falsetti Chief, Division of Construction Headquarters, California Department of Transportation Seeking Common Ground in Unprecedented Times ......... Ryan Aukerman Executive Vice President Grifth Company Partnering – Our Way of Doing Business .................................. Toks Omishakin Director California Department of Transportation Awards Presentation ......................................................................................... Devin Porr HQ Partnering Program Manager California Department of Transportation 1 │ Table of Contents Projects Less than $10 Million NR-D1 Relinquishment of Old 101, Granite Construction Company ......................................... │ 7 NR-D3 SR 84 CIR & RHMA, DeSilva Gates Construction ................................................................... │ 9 D7 I-5 Of-Ramp and Bridge Widening Project, C.A. Rasmussen, Inc. ........................... │ 11 D7 SR-33 Soil Nail Wall and Rock Slope Protection Project, C.A. Rasmussen, Inc. .. │ 13 Projects Greater than $10 Million –
    [Show full text]