DOCSLIB.ORG

Teichert Shifler Mining and Reclamation Project NOP Public

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Teichert Shifler Mining and Reclamation Project NOP Public Teichert Shifler Mining and Reclamation Project NOP Public Commenters 1. Rigo Torres 8.18.19 2. Matthew Pirtle 8.18.19 3. Lisa Nicholas 8.18.19 4. Pacific Gas and Electric Company 8.19.19 5. Elise Brandwajn 8.19.19 6. Gregory Ramirez 8.19.19 7. Jon Huffine 8.21.19 8. California Department of Conservation – Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources 8.22.19 9. California Department of Conservation – Division of Land Resource Protection 8.26.19 10. Julie Frommelt Payne 8.26.19 11. Aaron Johnson 8.27.19 12. Pamela Van Brocklin 8.29.19 13. Rudy Lopez 8.29.19 14. Joyce and Ranse Reynolds 8.29.19 15. Eric Dowdy 8.29.19 16. Mark and Katherine Stinson 8.30.19 17. Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District 9.3.19 18. Tim and Barbara Sharp 9.4.19 19. Annette Davis 9.4.19 20. Dale Sumersille and Dawne Koranda 9.4.19 21. Northwest Information Center 9.5.19 22. California Department of Fish and Wildlife 9.6.19 23. Heidi Frommelt Potter 9.6.19 24. Bea Leonardi 9.6.19 25. Cathy Stamey 9.6.19 26. Julie Payne 9.8.19 27. Native American Heritage Commission 9.10.19 28. Margaret Kronenberg 9.10.19 29. Ruth Schreiber (verbal comment) 9.10.19 30. Monique Marin 9.11.19 31. NOP Public Scoping Meeting 9.12.19 32. Dayle Murray 9.12.19 33. Joyce and Ranse Reynolds 9.13.19 34. Diane Tauzer 9.13.19 35. Jerry and Stacy Beckwith 9.14.19 36. Lynn Shaw Reynolds 9.14.19 37. Thomas Wilkop 9.15.19 38. Keila Golden 9.15.19 39. Sergio Hernandez 9.15.19 40. Amanda Jarose 9.15.19 41. Georgia Cochran 9.16.19 NOP Comment Letters - Page 1 42. Daren Robbins 9.16.19 43. Barbara Koerber 9.16.19 44. George Lu 9.16.19 45. Ryan Payne 9.16.19 46. Janet Levers 9.16.19 47. Phil and Mary Beck 9.16.19 48. Joyce Reynolds 9.16.19 49. Alan Koerber 9.16.19 50. Lori Sinor 9.16.19 51. Cynthia Johe 9.16.19 52. Paul Sinor 9.16.19 53. Ryan Hall 9.16.19 Letters Received After Close of the Comment Period 54. Monique Marin 9.16.19 55. Rick and Janet Sitts 9.16.19 56. Ruth Schreiber 9.17.19 57. Laura Smyth – Wild Wings HOA, Community Association Manager 9.18.19 58. Paul Crist 9.19.19 59. California State Clearinghouse 8.16.19 NOP Comment Letters - Page 2 Letter 1 From: rigo torres [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 1:09 PM To: Stephanie Cormier <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__Stephanie.Cormier- 40yolocounty.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf- v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=kdtPCKeqKIngwAPH6qvp5f_ExA_ifBGx-p-DA3WNK- M&m=fznAY7Rwbq1il5vb2dFCP3c2TGe5M9z_Y4jzWpnF_1c&s=FfgMt5fP8BytEgROdNjp2OGyG74JMUpdzwhthhe9Gl4&e=> Subject: Teichert My name is RIgo Torres I live at 18170 mandarin street in wildwings if you guys approve these permits to go through it will be devastating to the ground water aqua fifers once gone it’s for ever gone it’s not always about the money please do the right thing and don’t approve it stand up to the mighty big gravel kings Sent from my iPhone NOP Comment Letters - Page 3 Letter 2 From: Matthew Pirtle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 4:12 PM To: Stephanie Cormier <[email protected]> Subject: Mining project adjacent to Yolo Flyers Club Stephanie, I live in the Wild Wings community that is directly across from the area that is being consider for mining. There is a high concern that the ground water table that we use in Wild Wings( 2 wells) could be affected by this mining operation. The possible exavated ground in this mining operation could seriously affect the cleanliness of the ground water that the Wild Wings community draws from. We already have issues with our water supply from a volume issue and excessive boron and arsenic concentrations. Removing the natural filtering system of topsoil and naturals rocks and minerals may produce more problems. Has there been an independent environmental investigation and report that addresses there concerns? Will Teigart provide a remedy for problems with our water systems that would effect over 300 homes in Wild Wings? Concerned, Matt Pirtle, 18171 Mallard Street, Wild Wings. NOP Comment Letters - Page 4 Letter 3 From: Lisa Nicholas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 5:12 PM To: Stephanie Cormier <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__Stephanie.Cormier- 40yolocounty.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf- v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=kdtPCKeqKIngwAPH6qvp5f_ExA_ifBGx-p-DA3WNK-M&m=- SVD0mlw_3HgAjOextpnQtifV7ruMMR7tVC6i1Hdmxg&s=AIt0jdim2hMf6B3gKSe0ySSy_dVX0El4gqmJBebzOnA&e=> Subject: Mining I understand that there is a consideration for a mining company to do business adjacent to our homes. I live out in wild wings with a disabled teenager. We moved out here to get away from many of the problems that heavy construction and urban living can bring. Please don’t allow this project to go forward. Not only will it adversely affect our home values, but will also affect the quality of life and the quality of our water and soil. Please don’t allow this! Sincerely Lisa Nicholas Wildwing D Sent from my iPad NOP Comment Letters - Page 5 Letter 4 August 19, 2019 Stephanie Cormier County of Yolo 292 W Beamer St Woodland, CA 95695 Ref: Gas and Electric Transmission and Distribution Dear Ms. Cormier, Thank you for submitting the Teichert Shifler Mining & Reclamation Project plans for our review. PG&E will review the submitted plans in relationship to any existing Gas and Electric facilities within the project area. If the proposed project is adjacent/or within PG&E owned property and/or easements, we will be working with you to ensure compatible uses and activities near our facilities. Attached you will find information and requirements as it relates to Gas facilities (Attachment 1) and Electric facilities (Attachment 2). Please review these in detail, as it is critical to ensure your safety and to protect PG&E’s facilities and its existing rights. Below is additional information for your review: 1. This plan review process does not replace the application process for PG&E gas or electric service your project may require. For these requests, please continue to work with PG&E Service Planning: https://www.pge.com/en_US/business/services/building- and-renovation/overview/overview.page. 2. If the project being submitted is part of a larger project, please include the entire scope of your project, and not just a portion of it. PG&E’s facilities are to be incorporated within any CEQA document. PG&E needs to verify that the CEQA document will identify any required future PG&E services. 3. An engineering deposit may be required to review plans for a project depending on the size, scope, and location of the project and as it relates to any rearrangement or new installation of PG&E facilities. Any proposed uses within the PG&E fee strip and/or easement, may include a California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) Section 851 filing. This requires the CPUC to render approval for a conveyance of rights for specific uses on PG&E’s fee strip or easement. PG&E will advise if the necessity to incorporate a CPUC Section 851filing is required. This letter does not constitute PG&E’s consent to use any portion of its easement for any purpose not previously conveyed. PG&E will provide a project specific response as required. Sincerely, Plan Review Team Land Management NOP Comment Letters - Page 6 Letter 4 Cont'd Attachment 1 – Gas Facilities There could be gas transmission pipelines in this area which would be considered critical facilities for PG&E and a high priority subsurface installation under California law. Care must be taken to ensure safety and accessibility. So, please ensure that if PG&E approves work near gas transmission pipelines it is done in adherence with the below stipulations. Additionally, the following link provides additional information regarding legal requirements under California excavation laws: http://usanorth811.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/CA-LAW-English.pdf 1. Standby Inspection: A PG&E Gas Transmission Standby Inspector must be present during any demolition or construction activity that comes within 10 feet of the gas pipeline. This includes all grading, trenching, substructure depth verifications (potholes), asphalt or concrete demolition/removal, removal of trees, signs, light poles, etc. This inspection can be coordinated through the Underground Service Alert (USA) service at 811. A minimum notice of 48 hours is required. Ensure the USA markings and notifications are maintained throughout the duration of your work. 2. Access: At any time, PG&E may need to access, excavate, and perform work on the gas pipeline. Any construction equipment, materials, or spoils may need to be removed upon notice. Any temporary construction fencing installed within PG&E’s easement would also need to be capable of being removed at any time upon notice. Any plans to cut temporary slopes exceeding a 1:4 grade within 10 feet of a gas transmission pipeline need to be approved by PG&E Pipeline Services in writing PRIOR to performing the work. 3. Wheel Loads: To prevent damage to the buried gas pipeline, there are weight limits that must be enforced whenever any equipment gets within 10 feet of traversing the pipe. Ensure a list of the axle weights of all equipment being used is available for PG&E’s Standby Inspector.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of California Department of Transportation Statement of Ongoing Contracts As of 01 District
    State of California Department of Transportation Page 1 Statement of Ongoing Contracts as of 06/20/21 06/28/21 District 01 Location Awarded Contract Bid + CCOs Approved %Time Storm Water Resident Fed Aid Description Comp To date Est Comp % Work Plan Engineer Pgm Code Type Of Work Contractor This Month Accepted Message 01-DN-101-8.2/8.7 IN DEL NORTE COUNTY NEAR KLAMATH AT GOLDEN STATE BRIDGE, INC. CLAYTON MALMBERG $18,896,414 04/21/20 34% 01-0B0904 $5,157,126 05/08/20 PANTHER CREEK BRIDGE #01-0025 AND AT 3701 MALLARD DRIVE; 207 PROCE MALL 27% $1,310,631 08/05/22 HUNTER CREEK BRIDGE #01-0003 CRESCENT CITY, CA 95531 BENICIA CA 94510 REPLACE BRIDGE (707)496-5581 (925)372-8000 HA21 01-DN-101-12.5/15.5 IN DEL NORTE COUNTY NEAR KLAMATH FROM G R SUNDBERG, INC. SANDERS, KAREN $11,985,000 02/16/16 100% 01-0G1004 $11,984,109 05/04/16 0.4 MILE SOUTH OF WILSON CREEK BRIDGE 5211 BOYD ROAD 207 PRICE MALL 100% $0 04/09/21 TO 1.7 MILES NORTH OF RUDISIL ROAD CRESCENT CITY, CA 95531 ARCATA, CA 95521 DIR'S EMERGENCY F. (707)498-4009 OVER RUN (707)825-6565 ROADWAY STABILIZATION AND RETAINING 20.20 WALL R 201130 01-DN-101-25.5/27.4 IN DEL NORTE COUNTY IN AND NEAR S.T. RHOADES CONSTRUCTION, KAREN SANDERS $6,279,838 12/08/20 20% 01-0C6604 $1,447,194 12/29/20 CRESCENT CITY FROM 0.2 MILE SOUTH OF INC.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Sacramento California
    COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA Control No.: PLNP2010-00264 Type: GPB-RZB-UPB-REB-DGB TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: STONERIDGE QUARRY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONE, USE PERMIT, RECLAMATION PLAN, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONTACT: Jeff Gamel, Senior Planner, 874-5835; [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NOS.: 073-0020-008, 072-0110-045 and 065. LOCATION: The project site is located approximately three miles south of US Highway 50, and 25 miles east of the City of Sacramento in eastern Sacramento County, California. More specifically, the project site is located approximately 1.5 miles south of White Rock Road, and 500 feet east of Scott Road, in the unincorporated Cosumnes community planning area of Sacramento County (Supervisor District 5: Don Nottoli) APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Angelo G. Tsakopoulos Cunningham Engineering 7423 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 10 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200 Carmichael, CA 95608 Davis, CA 95618 Attention: Pete Dwelley Attention: Steve Greenfield OWNER: REPRESENTATIVE: Angelo G. and Katherine Tsakopoulos Law Offices of Gregory D. Thatch 7423 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 10 1730 I Street, Suite 220 Carmichael, CA 95608 Sacramento, CA 95811 Attention: Angelo G. Tsakopoulos Attention: Gregory D. Thatch STONERIDGE QUARRY PLNP2010-00264 073-0020-008, 072-0110-045/065 REQUEST: 1. A General Plan Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Diagram to remove the Resource Conservation Area (RCA) land use designation from 410 acres of the 1,360+ acre property and to add the Aggregate Resource Area (ARA) land use designation to 619 acres of the property. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineers News
    OPERA ~.-.; · NG ·ENGINEERS . LOC,Al 3 STATIONARY ENGINEERS lOCAl -39 I VOL a-No; 5 .-:D SAN FRANCISCO, CALif. -- Mav 15. 1950 --------------------~--~~--------~------------------------ .. Members Must ~ ' .... ~- . .. I I Have :O.nJy ,' State. ... f Dis~bility Plan t ByP. E:VANDEWARI{ . I Assistant Local Union. ·Manager .Again it is 1iec'essary to call. at­ ROOSEVELT, MltLER GET .FULL AFL BACKING; ~e ntion to the brothers that · a · re­ DISTRICT CONGRESSMEN ARE ENDORSED jlewed drive· is being made · upon California voters will go to the polls on June 6 to vote on ~he_ private ~nsura;nce - companj.ei\i , jobs, a matter carrying disability insurance -plans· I vital to the daily comfort and year-round se­ Calling for ·cancellatio.n of ·· such curity for themselves and.Jheil" families and now being loudly IJlaus. · · championed by candidates for public office. Bu~iness representatives of. the The stat.e's bigg.est labor organi- orgal)ization . will again. be calling I' upon Bew:are Th;s Vici,.ftus zation, a million-member chunk of . you to . sign. a release, which . ..,. U U H nn.; the American Federation of Labor, will be .presented to your employ- ENGINEERS BRING WATER-Shown ubove· at the grcund-b:reaking believes that James Roosevelt, eld- ei· 0 , if you are covered by a· private of a $12 million water pipeline project are union and city officials. B~ est son of the late great FDR, hi'S irsurance t H plan ana have- not al- : B~o. Victor Swanson, business manager of Loca.} 3, is seMnd :from . ;OW ·. ous~ng the most praetical solutions to the , rea a.
    [Show full text]
  • September 1968
    ~... .,..... • Shipyard Union Joins Local No.3 "Servi~g the men who move the earth!" *- * * ENGINEER NEWS 731 Amalgamated - - PUBLISHED TO PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE OF ALL ENGINEERS AND THEIR FAMILIES In Vallejo Meeting • The bittersweet odor of nostalgia-fed with -the incense of -old memories and old fellowships- usually permeates the currents of - . GUAM, WHERE AMERICA'S DAY BEGINS HAWAII, THE SO~H- STATE NO~TH E RN CALIFORNIA, THE GOLDEN STATE pomp and circumstance that mark the passing of old-line charter unions into the open arms of a larger brotherhood. •-.:! scent, strangely enough, was missing w:hen the 49-year Vol. 27-No. 9 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA __ _ .September, 1-968 This old civil service union, Local 731 ( IUOE) of the Mare Island Naval Shipyard was amalgamated with Locat_ Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers on September 7 in Vallejo, California. Maybe it was because both unions are issue of the same Inter- · IMPORT ANT NOTICE national parentage, or more simply because most men who operate In keeping with the action heavy equipment are like the taken at the Semi-Annual Meet­ colonel's lady-"brothers under the ing held on July 13, 1968, • skin." No matter the reason, 'joie whereby the membership con· de vivre' and the spirit of happy_ curred in the recommendation unity were everywhere evident at of the Executive Board setting the ceremonies celebrating the aside temporarily all but $1.00 official amalgamation this month. per month of the dues increase, which would have been forth­ International Vice President and Article VI of the Local 3 ·Business Manager AI coming as per By-Laws; In addition, the action Clem told the gathering of new was that the $1.00 per month Local 3 m embers, their wives and dues increase would not become officers that they were not in fact effective until October 1, 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of the Land 5/20/09 4:02 PM Page 96
    05112_gsl_128pg_r8_v8.qxd:Stories of the Land 5/20/09 4:02 PM Page 96 PAGE 96 C h a p t e r 07 Stories of the Land CHAPTER 7 — SOURCE AND SUBSTANCE OF CITIES The Natoma Camp at Excelsior and Jackson Roads constructed for the homeless during the Depression (courtesy of June Barmby Sandbakken). Photographer Dorothea Lange and American River migrant worker camp she documented in 1938 (courtesy of NARA LC USF 34-009903-6). 05112_gsl_128pg_r8_v8.qxd:Stories of the Land 5/20/09 4:02 PM Page 97 PAGE 97 C h a p t e r 07 Stories of the Land CHAPTER 7 — SOURCE AND SUBSTANCE OF CITIES From the late 1800s until World War II, the Brighton Township had supplied people in many American and European cities with fruit. In its first 50 years from 1860 to 1910, the population grew fivefold to over 2,500. Then the Depression hit and the farms and ranches suffered. People poured into California hoping to find employment in fields and orchards only to discover there was little or no work. Migrant workers from the Dust Bowl states set up camp on the south side of the American River and were photographed there by Dorothea Lange. Farms and farming equipment were repossessed. And, as was illustrated with the Johnson family’s loss of home and land at Walsh Station, Brighton experienced its share of suffering. he area was served by the railroad and many homeless people, referred to at the Brighton suffered from a double blow in those difficult years, as did many agricultural time as “hobos”, rode the rails during the Depression, wandering and looking for communities: although Roosevelt’s New Deal had begun to take effect in some areas, work.
    [Show full text]
  • TEICHERT CONSTRUCTION Established 1887
    *** All Quotes must have the Department of Industrial Relations # to be ACCEPTED *** 400 Sunrise Avenue, Ste. 300 All D.I.R.#s expired, a renewal letter must be included. Roseville, CA 95661 Ph (916) 757-6400 Fax (916) 757-6499 TEICHERT CONSTRUCTION Established 1887 Request for qualified bids from Subcontractors, Suppliers & Truckers for the following project: Project: US 101/De La Cruz Boulevard/Trimble Road Interchange Improvements – Contract C21001 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Bid Date: 5/18/21 @ 2:00 PM Docs & Plans Available from https://secure.procurenow.com/portal/vta Estimate: $50,600,000 Duration: 1360 calendar days (including 365 calendar days for plant establishment) Agency Goals: 5.26% SBE Project Description: Teichert Construction is requesting quotes from all qualified subcontractors and suppliers including certified SBE firms for the following items of work, including but not limited to: all materials, labor and equipment for CONSTRUCTION AREA SIGNS, TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM, PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE, REMOVE BRIDGE ITEM, MODIFY BRIDGE ITEM, CLEARING & GRUBBING, ROADWAY EXCAVATION, GRADING, STRUCTURE EXCAVATION, STRUCTURE BACKFILL, DITCHES EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION, HIGHWAY PLANTING, SOIL AMENDMENTS, HYDROSEEDING, EROSION CONTROL, IRRIGATION SYSTEM, TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL , AGGREGATE SUB BASE, AGGREGATE BASE, ASPHALT CONCRETE, PAVING ASPHALT (ASPHALT CONCRETE), PLACE ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE & MISC, RECYCLE, RECLAIM ASPHALT CONCRETE, PORTLAND CEMENT & CONCRETE PAVEMENT, FURNISH & DRIVE PILING, CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Caltrans Partnering Ceremony Program
    20TH ANNUAL CALTRANS EXCELLENCE IN PARTNERING AWARDS CEREMONY th ® Partnering 20th Annual California Department of Transportation Excellence in Partnering Awards Ceremony 20 August 18, 2020 | 2:00pm – 4:00pm Welcome .................................................................................................................... Devin Porr HQ Partnering Program Manager California Department of Transportation Partnering at Caltrans ............................................................................. Rachel Falsetti Chief, Division of Construction Headquarters, California Department of Transportation Seeking Common Ground in Unprecedented Times ......... Ryan Aukerman Executive Vice President Grifth Company Partnering – Our Way of Doing Business .................................. Toks Omishakin Director California Department of Transportation Awards Presentation ......................................................................................... Devin Porr HQ Partnering Program Manager California Department of Transportation 1 │ Table of Contents Projects Less than $10 Million NR-D1 Relinquishment of Old 101, Granite Construction Company ......................................... │ 7 NR-D3 SR 84 CIR & RHMA, DeSilva Gates Construction ................................................................... │ 9 D7 I-5 Of-Ramp and Bridge Widening Project, C.A. Rasmussen, Inc. ........................... │ 11 D7 SR-33 Soil Nail Wall and Rock Slope Protection Project, C.A. Rasmussen, Inc. .. │ 13 Projects Greater than $10 Million –
    [Show full text]
  • Recirculated Draft EIR for the Capitol Annex Project
    Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Capitol Annex Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049066 Prepared for California Department of General Services 707 3rd Street, MS-509 West Sacramento, CA 95605 Stephanie Coleman, Senior Environmental Planner Prepared by Ascent Environmental, Inc. 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sean Bechta, Project Manager January 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................................................. iii 1 INTRODUCTION (REVISED) ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Background and Purpose of the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report ...................................1-1 1.2 Content and Summary of the Recirculated Draft EIR ........................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Environmental Review Process for the Recirculated Draft EIR ........................................................................... 1-3 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (REVISED) ................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Project Background and Need...................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Project Objectives.............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Teichert Shifler Mining and Reclamation Project
    TTeeiicchheerrtt SShhiifflleerr MMiinniinngg aanndd RReeccllaammaattiioonn PPrroojjeecctt SCH# 2019089053 Draft Environmental Impact Report Volume II of III (Appendices A-C) Prepared for Yolo County December 2020 Prepared by 1501 Sports Drive, Suite A, Sacramento, CA 95834 Draft EIR Teichert Shifler Mining & Reclamation Project December 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME II Appendices Appendix A Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study Appendix B NOP Comment Letters and Summary of Verbal Comments Appendix C Mining and Reclamation Plan VOLUME III Appendices Continued (on USB Drive) Appendix D Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Modeling and Health Risk Assessment Modeling Appendix E Biological Resource Assessments and Peer Review: • E1: Biological Resources Assessment • E2: Biological Resources Assessment Peer Review • E3: Preconstruction Chiroptera (Bat) Survey Appendix F Wetland Delineation Documentation • F1: Wetland Delineation (2012) • F2: Teichert Shifler Delineation Report (2019) • F3: Shifler Project Site Aquatic Resources Delineation (2020) • F4: USACE Wetland Delineation Update (2020) Appendix G Cultural Resource Assessment Appendix H Slope Stability Evaluation, Geology and Dewatering Memos • H1: Shifler Slope Stability Evaluation • H2: Teichert Shifler Geology Memo • H3: Teichert Shifler Dewatering Memo Appendix I Phase I and Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Appendix J Cache Creek Hydraulics Study and Channel Stability Analysis • J1: Shifler Off-Channel Hydraulics Study Table of Contents Page i Draft EIR Teichert Shifler
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of the Land 5/20/09 4:02 PM Page 114
    05112_gsl_128pg_r8_v8.qxd:Stories of the Land 5/20/09 4:02 PM Page 114 PAGE 114 C h a p t e r 08 Stories of the Land CHAPTER 8 — THE NEW COMMUNITIES OF BRIGHTON TOWNSHIP Mather Field supply staff during World War II (courtesy of June Barmby Sandbakken). 05112_gsl_128pg_r8_v8.qxd:Stories of the Land 5/20/09 4:02 PM Page 115 PAGE 115 C h a p t e r 08 Stories of the Land CHAPTER 8 — THE NEW COMMUNITIES OF BRIGHTON TOWNSHIP The second half of the 20th century has brought more change to the Brighton area. The prime agricultural lands cultivated by the Routiers, Manloves, and other pioneer farmers bordering Folsom, Keifer, and Old Placerville Roads, started being developed into mixed use and residential neighborhoods in the 1950s. Brighton Township then was either home to or close to three large employers — Mather Air Force Base, the Army Signal Depot, and GenCorp/Aerojet-General Corporation, a private jet and rocket propulsion design, testing and manufacturing company. Affordable housing was needed. Companies like Sierra Builders and Rosemont Development began purchasing land and building. Development had arrived. The opportunity this time would be in real estate, building, and selling homes. oday well over 100,000 people live in the area bounded by the American River As the aggregate plays out, the question becomes: What next? What will the next era bring and Jackson Road to north and south, and Watt and White Rock Road to the west for this ever-changing landscape? and east. The strawberries, grapes and truck farms that dominated the northern half of Brighton Township 100 years ago have been replaced by mixed-use Back in 1967 Henry Teichert predicted that a new kind of community would eventually residential and business areas.
    [Show full text]