DOCSLIB.ORG

Date: This Email Is in Response to Your Request That I Review the Booz Allen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Date: This Email Is in Response to Your Request That I Review the Booz Allen Larry Fisher <[email protected]> [Addto AddressBook] [This is spaml To: barrett. [email protected] Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Feedback on BAH Contract I Gallup Survey followup comments Date: Apr 11, 2006 4:00 PM This Email is in response to your request that I review the Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) write-up concerning EPA's internal control weaknesses, as mandated by OMB A-123. My first general comment is that the majority of the information contained in BAH's review of EPA's internal control weaknesses are not revelations bu a regurgitation of information that is already known within EPA. In short, the survey was not only unnecessary but another example of why I characterized the actions of the Central Agencies' and EPA's (current and prospective) revolving door bureaucrats and their politically connected contractors as self serving and a gross waste of our tax dollars. In my April 7 OCFO Gallup Survey Email, I expressed my concern that the sole function of the Central Agencies' and agency's revolving door bureaucrats was not to resolve the government's accountability problems but to secure a lucrative and on-going revenue source for themselves and their corporate benefactors. The rational for that statement is based upon my 6- year experience as a Veterans Administration (VA) Branch Chief where my staff prepared the VA's agency level financial statements (using the Central Agencies' policies), lO-years system accountant experience with EPA and the Treasury Department (and liaison work with OMS and GAO). In additio I have successfully completed an accounting model (in 3-years) replicating the federa government's accounting and budgeting processes. That process has been reviewed by a former government CPA along with other government accountants. Whether my accounting logic is correct or not is immaterial. What is material is that EPA's managers have ostracized me for the past lO-years for questioning both their accounting deficiencies along with the Central Agencies' simplistic and untested accounting and financial system standards. While I have documented EPA manager's blatant efforts to hide all accounting deficiencies in search of that clean (and meaningless) audit opinion, I have not articulated the reasons for my comments regarding the Central Agencies. They are as follows: GAO relies on AICPA contractors to formulate the government's accounting Standard and related policies. These professionals are not just 4-year degreed Accountants (as I am) but, in addition, these contractors passed their AICPA exams. In short, they are professionals in the accounting field. They, more than anyone, know that new or revised accounting processes (like the government's accounting standard)are always tested before implementation (i.e. imposing this standard on an entire federal bureaucracy). An accounting model is typically used for this purpose and the process is quite basic: 1) design the journal entries that represent the accounting logic for each possible transaction type, 2) summarize those journal entries to produce a trial balance, and 3) generate the government's financial statements from that single trial balance. If, after entering all possible journal entry variations, the resultant trial balance can generate all government accounting and budgeting financial statements, the accounting model is a success. If not, the entire process must be repeated until the desired effect is achieved. I find it very difficult to believe that, after 15 years (beginning in OctobeJ 1990), that this very talented group of professionals were unable to design a single working accounting model. This is significant because with no accounting model, there is no basis for designing the government's financial (accounting) software. So, the question that I keep asking myself is -- how is it possible for a single government accountant to design an accounting model in 3-years when the AICPA's best and brightest could not achieve a comparable result in IS-years? As much as I do have a very positive image of myself, I am also not delusional. Something just does not add up!! In addition to this fact, I also find it particularly troubling that the government's revolving door bureaucrats are going to considerable length to undermine the integrity of our government by eliminating its 4-year degreed accountants and then replacing them with minimally (G.E.D)educated people. The Treasury Department (and their financial software contractor partners) provide the first real opportunity to test the legitimacy of the GAO (and AICPA) accounting standard. This occurs when Treasury's systems accountants (of which I was one in 1987) enter all possible journal entry combinations and generate a trial balance along with the government's financial statements. The only problem was that in 1987, the government had no accounting standard and, thus, no basis for testing the financial software that it was purchasing. I was selected as Treasury's representative along with two other individuals (one from GAO and one from OMB) on a joint task force. I explained this problem and was told that the decision had already been made and that our responsibility was to complete a (meaningless) systems questionnaire where all vendors (AMS and CDSI) would certify that they had met all government system requirements (which were none) . As the Treasury systems accountant, I was also responsible for testing CDSI's software. The result was that the software was so bad that I could enter only 13 transactions per hour and no reports were generated. All reports still had to be done manually. I made all supervisors aware of this deficient software. Despite these very serious problems, this software was made available to an entire federal bureaucracy. The logic for this very bad decision was soon apparent when we learned that the Deputy Commissioner of Treasury became a vice president with CDSI. Enter the world of the self serving revolving door bureaucrat!! The direct cost of misdirecting the resources of an entire federal bureaucracy over this 19-year period (2006 - 1987) for the AMS and CDSI software is easily in the tens of billions. The indirect costs of these very bad decisions in lost/stolen assets, uncollected receivables, etc. is in the hundreds of billions of dollars. The bottom line is that with no credible government-wide accounting standard, There is no point in procuring financial (accounting) software. If there are any Questions regarding this statement, look at GAO's own written Congressional testimony and its inability (ever) to consolidate the government's financial statements (as is required of all corporations). OMB is responsible for resolving (??) the agency's self-induced accounting Deficiencies that were caused by our government accountant (non-accountant) managers, as mandated by OMB Circular A-123. The typical approach is to use former agency managers and revolving door bureaucrats who typically caused the agencies accounting deficiencies, in the first place, by intentionally hiring non-accountants to ensure a failed process. To illustrate their agency team spirit, however, all agency deficiencies are first hidden and any non-team players (usually accountants) are retaliated against and eliminated in pursuit of that clean audit opinion. Then, the agencies hidden problems are revealed and, now, OMB with its politically connected contractors (including that new EPA revolving door bureaucrat) perform their superficial and meaningless analysis -- all in the name of government accountability. All parties come out a lot richer with the exception of the taxpayers and any (accountant) whistlelblowers who try to prevent this gross waste of our tax dollars. The problem is that in government finance, staff and managers are promoted Solely upon three minimal requirements: 1) paying invoices, 2) obtaining 24 credit Hours from any podunk college, and 3) loyalty to their supervisor. These technically unqualified accountant (non-accountants) fill the ranks of our government's GS-9 thru GS-15, SES, and political appointees finance positions. The problem is that the government's accounting, budgeting, and financial software requirements demand technically qualified accountants and Information Technology (IT)professionals if these processes are to work. I have already given you a glimpse of the hundreds of billions that are wasted each year. The bottom line is that it makes much more sense to hire accountants (at Comparable salaries with the private sector) into accounting technician positions and cross train them in all facets of the government than it does to hire minimally educated people and call them accountants. The benefit is that these accountants will ensure the integrity of the data at the front of the process (agency level) and at the point that the government's data is generated (agency and GAO's consolidated financial statements). The down side to that idea is that it eliminates the need for revolving door bureaucrats and their politically connected contractors. Then agai what are we trying to accomplish, cut our deficit, or provide luxurious life styles for our minimally qualified revolving door bureaucrats and their corporate benefactor These problems will only get resolved if we increase our educational requirements dramatically (as noted in Attachment 2 of my April 7 OCFO Gallup Survey Email)and start providing jail time for our self-serving and corrupt ROB's and contractors..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Does Business Owe the World? US Sustainability Report Summary 2017 About This Report
    What does business owe the world? US Sustainability Report Summary 2017 About this report The EY US Sustainability Report 2017 covers FY17, from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017. Several initiatives or stories that were launched in FY18 are included in this report as they may be relevant and provide more up-to-date information to our stakeholders. Ernst & Young LLP (together with its affiliate, Ernst & Young U.S. LLP) is a limited liability partnership organized in Delaware and is a member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee (EYG). In this report, we refer to ourselves as “EY US” and “we.” EY refers collectively to the global organization of the member firms of EYG. Learn more This document is a high-level summary of our full sustainability report, available at ey.com. PURPOSE 2 ABOUT EY 3 SUSTAINABILITY 5 PRINCIPLES 9 PEOPLE 11 1 SERVICE 17 COMMUNITIES 19 ENVIRONMENT 23 LEARN MORE 25 1 US Sustainability Report Summary 2017 PURPOSE What happens when everyone in an organization is committed to a shared purpose? A word from Steve Howe, EY US Chairman and Americas Managing Partner Take a look around the world today, and you will see so impact to find one breakthrough idea, whether it is to redefine much that is inspiring — and that may make us feel uneasy. an important business process, to upend outmoded ways of New ways of working and connecting, enabled by advances in thinking or to instill a new passion for a community issue. technology and globalization, have accelerated to the point In the pages that follow, you will see the advances we have where what appears on the horizon is now right in our laps.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Your Future People Experience Five Imperatives for Action
    Secure your future people experience Five imperatives for action www.pwc.com/people 2 | Secure your future people experience Contents 4 5 31 32 Your people experience is at risk Time to take action Do what’s best for you The way forward 6 Tackle ‘burnout’ and boost vitality 35 About the survey 13 Build social resilience 18 Nurture agility and adaptability 24 Support ‘intrapreneurship’ 27 Provide autonomy 3 | Secure your future people experience Leaders preparing for tomorrow’s workforce face a world where the old preconceptions do not apply. Yesterday’s assumptions about how workers behave and what they value are being upended. This is a new reality. Employers need to harness a different mix of skills, support new ways of working and learning, and create new work environments that meet the needs of a diverse workforce. People will demand to be more autonomous, entrepreneurial and free from the constraints of time and place. Businesses need to create a compelling people experience to drive success in a world where technology and changing expectations are redefining what working means for everyone. 4 | Secure your future people experience Your people experience is at risk Much of today’s conversation about the future of work depicts an epic battle between machines and humans. Technology – and technological determinism – is at the forefront of this way of thinking. It’s not a stretch to predict that technology will be embedded keep the best talent. The full results are published in Preparing for into just about everything; constant and extraordinary innovation tomorrow’s workforce, today.2 in artificial intelligence, robotics and the Internet of Things will continue to radically reshape work.
    [Show full text]
  • Here the People’S Consent Is Being Manufactured by Our Government?
    OPEN THE BOOKS THE DEPARTMENT OF SELFPROMOTION HOW FEDERAL AGENCY PR SPENDING ADVANCES THEIR INTERESTS RATHER THAN THE PUBLIC INTEREST FISCAL YEARS 2007 – 2014: OVERSIGHT STUDY U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLIC AFFAIRS PUBLIC RELATIONS PR THE DEPARTMENT OF SELF-PROMOTION HOW FEDERAL AGENCY PR SPENDING ADVANCES THEIR INTERESTS RATHER THAN THE PUBLIC INTEREST FISCAL YEARS 2007 – 2014: OVERSIGHT STUDY PUBLISHED: NOVEMBER, 2015 By: Adam Andrzejewski, Chairman of American Transparency OpenTheBooks.com Dr. Tom Coburn, Honorary Chairman American Transparency “Open the Books is doing the work I envisioned when the Coburn-Obama bill became law. Their innovative app and other tools are putting sunlight through a magnifying glass.” March 11, 2014 OUR REPORT MADE POSSIBLE BY: The “Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006” Sponsors: Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) & Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) (Public Law 109-282, 109th Congress) “Is the spending in the public interest or the special interest?” – U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn “I know that restoring transparency is not only the surest way to achieve results, but also to earn back the trust in government…” – U.S. Sen. Barack Obama TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION & SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 5 Overview of the History of Government Public Affairs Officers ............................................................................ 6 TOP 10 TAKEAWAYS – THE DEPARTMENT OF SELF-PROMOTION .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mckinsey Quarterly 2015 Number 4.Pdf
    2015 Number 4 Copyright © 2015 McKinsey & Company. All rights reserved. Published since 1964 by McKinsey & Company, 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10022. Cover illustration by Vasava McKinsey Quarterly meets the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) chain-of- custody standards. The paper used in the Quarterly is certified as being produced in an environ- mentally responsible, socially beneficial, and economi- cally viable way. Printed in the United States of America. 2015 Number 4 This Quarter It’s almost a truism these days to say that modern corporations must be agile. The pace of industry disruption arising from the digital revolution, combined with nimble, new competitors—including many from emerging markets—have raised the cost of complacency and rigidity. But what does it mean to achieve agility? This issue’s cover package tries to answer that question, starting with intriguing new McKinsey research. Using data from McKinsey’s Organizational Health Index, Michael Bazigos, Aaron De Smet, and Chris Gagnon show how organizations that combine speed with stability are far likelier to be healthy than companies that simply move fast. The utility sector is a striking example of one industry that needs to combine flexibility and stability. Although digital competitors, new data-based business models, and renewable-energy sources are changing the landscape in certain markets, the industry’s sprawl- ing base of heavy assets remains core to its future. Sven Heiligtag and his colleagues Dominik Luczak and Eckart Windhagen describe how a number of leading utilities are trying to straddle these two worlds, suggesting some lessons for companies in other sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ☑ Filed by the Registrant ☐ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☐ Definitive Proxy Statement ☑ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box): ☑ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: Booz allen Hamilton ARCHITECT THE FUTURE IMPACT REPORT 2019 Selvi Clark Program manager DIS CL A IMER Forward Looking Safe Harbor Statement Certain statements contained in this document include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Work and Life Well-Lived Women in America
    Women in America: Work and Life Well-Lived “As leaders, it is our responsibility to be courageous and create change in the workplace. We have to examine, and even overhaul, our organizational policies, strategies, cultures and values to ensure that employees can maximize their potential in and out of the workplace.” Women in America About This Report WOMEN IN AMERICA: WORK AND LIFE WELL-LIVED presents valuable analytics and advice into what attracts, engages and retains a gender-diverse workforce in corporate America. More than 323,500 U.S. adults were surveyed for the report through the Gallup Panel and Gallup Daily tracking. Using discovery from this research, Gallup delivers an in-depth perspective on what an ideal work culture for women looks like and what organizations can do to achieve that culture. In this report, created for business leaders and managers, we focus on U.S. women. In 2017, Gallup and the International Labour Organization will release a groundbreaking report on women worldwide. ABOUT GALLUP Gallup delivers analytics and advice to help leaders and organizations solve their most pressing problems. Combining more than 80 years of experience with our global reach, Gallup knows more about the attitudes and behaviors of employees, customers, students and citizens than any other organization in the world. For more information about Gallup solutions for optimizing business performance, please visit www.gallup.com/contact. Copyright © 2016 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. 01 Women in America Letter From the COO DEAR BUSINESS LEADERS AND MANAGERS, The workplace is changing at a faster pace than I have seen in three decades of working outside the home.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan ICT Indicators Survey 2014 Presentation
    PAKISTAN ICT INDICATORS SURVEY, 2014 1 PAKISTAN ICT INDICATORS Survey 2014 TOPLINE FINDINGS Presented at NATIONAL ICT R & D FUND (Islamabad) 19 February 2015 Slide 2 AGENDA FOR THE MEETING . INTRODUCTION TO THE TEAM PART 1 : WHAT HAPPENED WHEN AND HOW Section 1: Understanding the OBJECTIVES AND Scope of Work INCLUDING METHODOLOGY Section 2: Key Findings of Pakistan ICT Indicators Survey Section 3: Comparison 2001and 2014 Section 4: Snapshot: Regional and International Comparison Section 5: Forecasting Broad ICT Trends (Brief) PART 2 : Policy Recommendations and Summing Up by Dr I Gilani WAY FORWARD – Q&A Slide 3 ABOUT GALLUP PAKISTAN Established in 1980, Gallup Pakistan draws upon its rich experience of over 35 years and continues to bring innovation and technology to business opinion and socio-economic research. We offer a unique combination of business acumen and technical know-how, which helps our Clients translate customer perceptions into effective business strategy. By transforming large amounts of data into insightful reports and analysis, we help our Clients better understand their professional needs and requirements. Gallup Pakistan is the country's most respected opinion and socio economic research organization and is widely quoted in national and international media. Being an affiliate of Gallup International we have close collaboration with Gallup associates all around the globe and enjoy the benefit of drawing upon an international pool of knowledge. Successful marketing relies upon the marketer's ability to translate customer needs and demands into an effective business plan that targets the right audience, and reflects their wants and desires. Gallup Pakistan is an expert in business research.
    [Show full text]
  • March 31, 2006
    Federal Communications Commission Office of the Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress October 1, 2005 – March 31, 2006 Kent R. Nilsson Acting Inspector General Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Universal Service Fund (USF)…………………………………………………………………………..3 Audits……………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 Management…………………………………………………………………………………………...…21 Investigations…………………………………………………………………………………………….22 Legislation………………………………………………………………………………………………..24 IG Hotline………………………………………………………………………………………………….25 Specific Reporting Requirements of the Inspector General Act………………………………..27 OIG Reports With Questioned Costs………………………………………………………………...29 OIG Reports With Recommendations That Funds Be Put To Better Use………………………30 1 Introduction The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent regulatory agency, which was delegated authority by Congress under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, in principal part, by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 as well as antecedent legislation (collectively, the "Act"). The FCC is charged with the regulation of interstate and international communication by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable. The FCC’s jurisdiction covers the fifty states, the District of Columbia and all U.S. territories. Under Section 1 of the Communications Act, the FCC was created for the purpose of regulating interstate and foreign commerce so as to make available, so far as possible, a rapid, efficient, nationwide and worldwide wire and radio communication service
    [Show full text]
  • World Economic Forum: Global Risks 2014
    Marsh & McLennan Companies is a proud contributor to the 2014 World Economic Forum Global Risks Report Insight Report Global Risks 2014 Ninth Edition Global Risks 2014, Ninth Edition is published by the World Economic Forum. The information in this report, or on which this report is based, has been obtained from sources that the authors believe to be reliable and accurate. However, it has not been independently verified and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information obtained from third parties. In addition, the statements in this report may provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and may include statements that do not directly relate to a historical or current fact. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are not exhaustive. The companies contributing to this report operate in a constantly changing environment and new risks emerge continually. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements. The companies contributing to this report undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update any statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, and they shall in no event be liable for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information in this report. World Economic Forum Geneva Copyright © 2014 By the World Economic Forum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the World Economic Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • Marijuana Becomes Mainstream: Challenges Remain For
    As marijuana becomes mainstream, challenges remain for employers 2 As marijuana becomes mainstream, challenges remain for employers In 1996, California became the first state to legalize the medical use of marijuana. A quarter-century later, the legal landscape and public perceptions of marijuana have shifted dramatically. Recreational adult use has been legalized in nearly 20 states, representing more than 40% of the US population, according to Census Bureau data. While still illegal under federal law, what was previously considered a forbidden substance is now part of the THE FEDERAL- mainstream. Many Americans are regular users of marijuana, and freely admit to being so. And, with the public’s backing, STATE DIVIDE states and municipalities continue to legalize or decriminalize Despite widespread legalization and decriminalization at the its use state and local levels, it remains illegal to cultivate, possess, or possession. use, or distribute marijuana under the federal Controlled But for employers, which must consider state and federal Substances Act of 1970 (CSA). Federal laws and regulations, laws and balance employees’ rights against the imperative including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s to maintain safe and drug-free workplaces, risks abound. General Duty Clause and the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, Case law, legislation, and court rulings generally support also explicitly bar the use of marijuana in workplace settings. employers’ right to keep marijuana out of the workplace, Additional scrutiny applies in some industries — notably, with some limits. The question of whether to use marijuana transportation. The Omnibus Transportation Employee as a form of treatment in workers’ compensation claims, Testing Act of 1991 requires drug and alcohol testing of meanwhile, is still mired in confusion.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Insurance Fact Book
    2019 Insurance Fact Book TO THE READER Imagine a world without insurance. Some might say, “So what?” or “Yes to that!” when reading the sentence above. And that’s understandable, given that often the best experience one can have with insurance is not to receive the benefits of the product at all, after a disaster or other loss. And others—who already have some understanding or even appreciation for insurance—might say it provides protection against financial aspects of a premature death, injury, loss of property, loss of earning power, legal liability or other unexpected expenses. All that is true. We are the financial first responders. But there is so much more. Insurance drives economic growth. It provides stability against risks. It encourages resilience. Recent disasters have demonstrated the vital role the industry plays in recovery—and that without insurance, the impact on individuals, businesses and communities can be devastating. As insurers, we know that even with all that we protect now, the coverage gap is still too big. We want to close that gap. That desire is reflected in changes to this year’s Insurance Information Institute (I.I.I.)Insurance Fact Book. We have added new information on coastal storm surge risk and hail as well as reinsurance and the growing problem of marijuana and impaired driving. We have updated the section on litigiousness to include tort costs and compensation by state, and assignment of benefits litigation, a growing problem in Florida. As always, the book provides valuable information on: • World and U.S. catastrophes • Property/casualty and life/health insurance results and investments • Personal expenditures on auto and homeowners insurance • Major types of insurance losses, including vehicle accidents, homeowners claims, crime and workplace accidents • State auto insurance laws The I.I.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Download and Read This Article I
    Employee engagement “I do.” Or do I? Over the last decade the business world has shown significant interest in the concept of employee “engagement.” Identified as an internal state of being – physical, mental and emotional – employee engagement brings together concepts of work effort, organizational commitment, job satisfaction and optimal experience. But does the social engagement of employees lead to a lasting and successful marriage? Yes, says this author. Deloitte | A Middle East Point of View | Fall 2013 | 29 Employee engagement is about being positively present Extensive studies have demonstrated the importance of at work by willingly contributing intellectual effort, employee engagement to organizational performance as experiencing positive emotions and meaningful a business concept that addresses employees’ levels of connections to others. This gives employee engagement interest and commitment to the job, resulting in a three dimensions: positive attitude towards one’s occupation and firm and • Intellectual: related to the job and how to enhance it; consequently leading to greater productivity. Gallup’s • Affective: linked to feeling positive about doing a Q12 Meta-analysis of 1.4 million employees conducted good job; and in 2012 and examining business performance, shows a • Social: concerned with taking opportunities to discuss positive correlation between employee engagement and work-related improvements with others at work. business outcomes despite tough economic conditions. More specifically, Gallup found that engaged employees are more productive and customer-focused, as well as more likely to stay with their employers (Gallup® and Perhaps one of the most distinctive Q12®, 2013). Enter the Millennials characteristics of Gen Y is their search The study, which covered different dimensions of for ‘meaning’ in the work place, a employee engagement, shows that employee engagement with corporate volunteerism is increasingly platform that encourages them to being identified as a key element in attracting and retaining top talent (see box).
    [Show full text]