The Fouch Brothers: Following Their Migration Through Nine States
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
********************************* The Fouch Brothers: Following Their Migration Through Nine States ********************************* By Lynn Scott The Fouch Brothers: Following Their Migration Through Nine States By Lynn Scott Copyright @2018 by Lynn Scott Printed by Humphries Press, Waynesboro, VA For corrections, additions or to purchase a copy of this book contact Lynn at [email protected] Map of Fouch migrations 1752 - 1870 Contents Introduction 1 Arrival in America 3 2nd Generation 5 3rd Generation 7 4th Generation 9 5th Generation 17 6th Generation 35 Unconnected Fouch Lines 89 Index of Fouch names 99 Index of Non Fouch names 106 Index of Places 111 1 INTRODUCTION In the search for the author’s ancestor, John Fouch, the 1840 Census was consulted. Six John Fouchs with the same approximate birth year were found in four states. When men of the same name show up in records throughout several states, their parentage can often be determined only by compiling multiple generations using thorough research so an accurate account of each individual can be determined. Hence the beginnings of this book. There has been much confusion and inaccurate information written about the Fouch family over the years, partly because they were so prolific and gave their children the same names. The fact that they moved from state to state makes sorting the generations even more difficult. Many thanks to Loraine Criddle, whose Fouch Family History Association Newsletter were invaluable in tracking some of the wondering Fouchs. One common trait among the family is that many lived to the age of 95. Variations of the spelling of the Fouch name throughout the book are done in the way that particular individual spelled his name. 2 3 ARRIVAL IN AMERICA The Fouch story begins when two Fouch immigrants arrived in America aboard a ship named Thomas; Hugh age 17 and Thomas age 16, probably brothers.1 Departing from London on August 21, 1635 with 56 other passengers bound for Virginia, they were “examined by the Minister of Gravesend touching their conformitie in our religion” prior to departure. This questioning indicates they were Protestants because “England was not allowing Catholics into Virginia and all potential emigrants were questioned under oath as to their religious beliefs.”2 Nothing about their parents or family is known at this time but their name implies a French ancestry and was probably pronounced “Foushay.”3 Records are silent on Hugh’s whereabouts for the next seven years. He may have been working off an indenture or simply working to earn money to purchase land. Regardless, life in the Virginia colonies at this time was not easy. Men unaccustomed to work stood little chance of survival. Their workday stretched ten to fourteen hours, six days a week.4 Five out of six persons arriving in the first thirty years of the Virginia settlement died of overwork, exposure to the semi-tropical sun (something called the “period of seasoning”), poor food, disease or Indian massacre.5 Whether Hugh was in Virginia or Maryland during these first years is unknown but a tax list of 1642 shows Hugh ffouch in Kent County, Maryland.6 It is here he met and became the partner of James Macgregor. In July 1650 the two men applied for 300 acres in Northumberland County, Virginia followed by 800 acres a year later.7 Northumberland land patent books show numerous transactions by Macgregor and Fouch which basically reveals they were land speculating. They bought 450 acres in 1653 and sold it in 1658. Their original 300 acres combined with another purchase of 394 acres in 1653 sold in 1658.8 They eventually made their homes on 1280 acres which included the 800 purchased in 1651 plus another 480 in 1661.9 All of this land was along the Chetanck Creek which spilled into the Potomac River. 1 John Camden Hotten, The original lists of persons of quality, 1600-1700 (New York: reprint: Empire State Book Co., 1874) 126, 127. 2 Billie Anita Foutch Breedlove, William Foutch and his descendants’ (Wyandotte, Ok: Gregath Publishing Co., 2000) 26. 3 The name Fouch appears in records as Foutch, Fouts, Foutz, Fouck, Fauche, Faugh, Feutch, Fowtch. For this work the name will be spelled Fouch unless referencing a specific source. 4 Russell R. Menard, “Servant to Freeholder: Status Mobility and Property Accumulation in the Seventeenth- Century Maryland,” The William and Mary Quarterly 30 (January 1973), 40. 5 Philip Alexander Bruce, Social Life of Virginia in the Seventeenth Century (Williamstown, MA: Corner House Publishers, 1968), 16. 6 Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, p. 66 7 Nell M. Nugent et. Al., Cavaliers and Pioneers: Abstracts of Virginia Land Patents and Grants [1666-1695] (Richmond, 1977), 1: 198, 211. 8 Ibid, 1: 236,255, 367, 382.l 9 Ibid, 1: 395. 4 Tobacco was the chief product for the early settlements, so prevalent it was used as a form of money. On the 21st of November 1653 Hugh ffouch was ordered to pay a Mr. Spoke 1,729 pounds of tobacco.10 And on November 5, 1668 Hugh received 100 pounds of tobacco from the County for shooting a wolf.11 Men often worked in partnership with one another to share the hard work of raising tobacco to gain capital to pay surveyor and clerk fees along with headrights to patent land. On average a man could harvest twelve hundred pounds of tobacco a year.12 The headright system which lasted until the end of the 17th century, said that anyone paying the passage of others to Virginia received fifty acres of land for each immigrant.13 Land records show that Macgregor and Fouch used headrights to gain their land and undoubtedly raised tobacco to pay for the headrights. Hugh stayed behind in Virginia when his partner, James Macgregor moved to Maryland in 1665.14 Eventually Hugh also moved to Maryland, selling his land in Virginia to Thomas Hughes in August of 1669. His wife, Rosamond is mentioned as consenting to the sale.15 Maryland court records reflect his entry into Maryland as an immigrant to Baltimore County in 1670 under the name “Forth.” He transported his wife, Rosamond and six daughters: Alice, Angell, Ann, Joane, Mary, Rosamond.16 Two years after arriving in Baltimore County, Maryland, Hugh proved a warrant for 650 acres of land.17 This may have included a 250 acre and a 200 acre tract transferred to Hugh from James Macgregor the same year.18 This land was described as “being on the east side of the Choppick Bay in the county of Baltimore [to become Cecil County in 1674] in a river called the Bohemia River.” The tract was known as the “Banks.” While Hugh and James no longer partnered in buying land, they did remain close friends. James named his son Hugh, presumably after Hugh Fouch and in James’ will, dated 1676, he left “my wearing clothes unto Hugh Fouche.”19 Hugh died between July 19, 1702 (the day his will was written) and July 27, 1702 (the day it was proved). In his will he names Henry Watson and son-in-laws, John Bavinton, husband of daughter Mary; Thomas Terry, husband of daughter Rosamond; and William Davis, husband of 10 Beverly Fleet, Virginia Colonial Abstracts, Vol. II Northumberland County Records, 1652-1655 (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1961), 36. 11 Fleet, Virginia Colonial Abstracts, Vol. I Northumbria Collection 1645-1720, 529. 12 Russell R. Menard, “Servant to Freeholder: Status Mobility and Property Accumulation in Seventeenth-Century Maryland,” The William and Mary Quarterly 30 (January 1973): 48-55. 13 Kenneth Morgan, Slavery and Servitude in North America, 1607-1800 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000), 8-13. 14 Harold Grier McCurdy, “James Macgregor and Thomas Mackgehee of Colonial Virginia,” The Virginia Genealogist, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1980, 247. 15 Ibid. 16 Gust Skordas, Early Settlers of Maryland (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1968), 165, 166. 17 Maryland Warrant Index, 1636-1751, p. 455, Maryland State Archives, SM129-1, Liber MM (#17) Hugh Forth, 1672, Folio 351, http://guide.mdsa.net. 18 Baltimore County, Maryland Land Records, Grantee Index, 1655-1769, p. 116, Hugh Fouch, 1672, Tract no RA, Folio 17, 22, Maryland State Archives CE 32-1, https://MDLandRec.net. 19 McCurdy, “James Macgregor and Thomas Mackgehee,” 247, 249. 5 daughter Angel, each inheriting a section of his land “Banks.” Seven grandchildren are named, three Davis daughters and four Terry daughters. He named son-in-law, Thomas Terry and his two brothers John and Richard as executors.20 Baptism records show that Hugh’s children and families attended St. Stephens Parish in Cecil County from between 1690 and 1717.21 Children of Hugh and Rosamond Fouch: 1. Hugh2 Fouch 2. Angell2 Fouch, m. William Davis.22 3. Alice2 Fouch, m. John Ryland.23 4. Ann2 Fouch 5. Joane2 Fouch 6. Mary2 Fouch, m. John Bavinton.24 7. Rosamond2 Fouch, m. Thomas Terry.25 2nd GENERATION 1. HUGH2 FOUCH (Hugh1) - Only two records have been located to prove the existence of Hugh Fouch, son of Hugh Fouch, the immigrant. We’ll label him Hugh2 to distinguish between the two men. The will of Richard Nash in 1680 gives to Hugh Foucke, Jr., 150 acres of land on the Elk River in Maryland.26 Even though the term Jr. doesn’t always mean a son of the so named individual, it does indicate another person by that name existed in the area. Since Hugh Fouch the immigrant was the only person with a surname of Fouch in Cecil County, it is a reasonable conclusion that Hugh, Jr. was his son. 20 Cecil County, Maryland, Prerogative Court Wills, 1701-1703, Liber TB, Hugh Fouch; online image, Maryland State Archives, (http://guide.mdsa.gov.net) Series S538-16, No.